Romans 8
ZerrCBCDavid Lipscomb Commentary On Romans 8Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus.—The provisions of the gospel for those who are in Christ Jesus are so complete that there remains no reason why they should be condemned. But there is a general impression that God demanded a more rigid obedience to his law under the Jewish dispensation than under the Christian. It is imagined that through the death of Christ in some way an indulgence from God was secured by which man might be allowed greater license in neglecting the law of God and in going his own way. This is a fatal mistake.Romans 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus made me free from the law of sin and of death.—-“ The law of the Spirit” is the law given by the Spirit through which life comes. It is placed in contrast with the law of sin and death that reigns in our flesh, and its superiority over the law of Moses is shown in that it made free from the law of sin and death that reigns in our flesh, and its superiority over the law of Moses is shown in that it made free from the law of sin and death, which that law could not do. The Spirit dwells in and works through his law, and he who takes the law into his heart and nourishes it as the seed of the kingdom has life.
That law of the Spirit, if man could be from birth kept under it, would preserve him from sin and death. As it is impossible to so bring man under that law from infancy until he is brought into Christ, inasmuch as the law works and can be conformed to only in Christ, so it makes provision for freeing him for sins committed and for bringing him into Christ, in whom he may find deliverance through the law from sins committed.
But remember that the law is God’ s direction into the channel in which he works. It defines the conditions on which God blesses or refuses to bless. The law is a guide to man to lead him into the channel in which God exerts his power for good in which his blessings are bestowed. It reveals to man that by placing himself within these channels in which God works he may be the recipient of the fruits of the divine working. And in harmonizing himself with these operations, being guided by them, and exerting his powers under these directions of God, he becomes a coworker with God in securing the joyful results of God’ s works to others. Man is the channel in which God works, and in harmony with the forces of divine life is molded into a likeness with God and borne forward by the working of God into an everlasting union and companionship with God.
So that God’ s destiny becomes his destiny and God’ s home his eternal home.Romans 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh,—The law of Moses was weak in seeking to control the flesh instead of the heart. [If it were not for the flesh, we could be perfect. The weakness is in the flesh, not in the law.
The law will not justify us unless we are perfect, and our weakness through the flesh prevents our reaching perfection.]God, sending his own Son—Jesus Christ came to fulfill, to do the whole will of God. It was his meat and drink to do his Father’ s will, and to do not his own work, but the work his Father sent him to do. He came not only to do this himself, but to inspire everyone who believes on him with the same spirit— with the same anxious desire to fulfill all righteousness, to do the whole will of God. One cannot believe in Christ Jesus with all the heart, without imbibing this spirit of the Master, without being filled with the desire to fulfill all righteousness, with the desire of doing not his own will but the will of the Father who is in heaven. Jesus Christ came as the living and perfect embodiment of obedience to the law of God, and with the purpose of inspiring others with the same spirit and leading all who trust in him to the same obedience from the heart to the law of God. His object was to call them away from their own wisdom, their own reason, away from and out of themselves, to the law of God as given by him, and exemplified in his own life as the only life rule of right to guide and bless man.in the likeness of sinful flesh—Jesus came and took on himself our nature, was tempted in all things as we are, yet without sin. [This describes man’ s animal nature as having become the seat of sin.
But of that nature of itself sin is no part nor property, only its fault and corruption. Hence, the Son of God could take of the human flesh of Mary, his mother, without the quality of sinfulness which sin has acquired in Adam’ s posterity.
In his case the flesh did not lead to sin, because he kept it in perfect subjection. He controlled it absolutely, and thus kept it from leading to sin, and in doing so made it sinless.]and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:—God, sending his own Son in the flesh, tempted with sin as we are, and as an offering to deliver from sin, overcame sin that dwelled in the flesh. [God condemned sin in the flesh by exhibiting in the person of Jesus Christ the same flesh in substance, but free from sin; he proved that sin was in the flesh only as an unnatural and usurping tyrant. And, again, he condemned sin practically and effectually by destroying its power and casting it out. The law could condemn sin only in word, and could not make its condemnation effectual. Christ, coming “ for sin,” not only died for sin, but, uniting man to himself “ in newness of life” (Romans 6:4), gave actual effect to the condemnation of sin by destroying its dominion in the flesh.]Romans 8:4that the ordinance of the law might be fulfilled in us,—Jesus came and overcame the law of sin, dwelling in the flesh, that through his help we might attain the righteousness set forth in the law. [In “ the likeness of sinful flesh,” in which he came, he paid the penalty fixed by the law and condemned sin. “ Him who knew no sin he made to be sin on our behalf; that we might become the righteousness of God in him.” (2 Corinthians 5:21). We live unto righteousness only in Christ.
All the human race is included in him, and he represents the whole human family; therefore, he can take away our guilt. This great fundamental truth that “ Christ died for all” was prophetically announced by John the Baptist when he said: “ Behold, the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world!” (John 1:29).
God finds no fault in his Son; and if we are in is Son, he will find no fault with us. “ Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows; yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities; the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed. All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way and Jehovah hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.” (Isaiah 53:4-6).]who walk not after the flesh,— [To walk after the flesh is to obey the dictates of the flesh, to allow the appetites and passions of the flesh to mark out our path. To do this is to obey sin, which dwells in the flesh.]but after the Spirit.—The Spirit dwells in the law of Christ revealed through inspired men, and to hear and obey their words is to walk after the Spirit.Romans 8:5 For they that are after the flesh mind the things of the flesh;—Those who are governed by the law of the flesh care for, or seek, the things that pertain to the flesh. [They are either engrossed with the gratification of worldly lusts or their one object in living is to hoard up wealth or to squander it in worldly amusements. They are lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God, or their one thought is how to get in society, or to distinguish themselves. They seek to be popular or to take the lead.
They have men’ s persons in admiration because of advantage to themselves. Paul enumerates the works of the flesh: “ Fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousies, wraths, factions, divisions, parties, envyings, drunkenness, revellings, and such like.” (Galatians 5:19-21).
As indicated by “ and such like,” there are many similar evil dispositions, vices, and vanity which destroy spiritual life.]but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.—They that follow the law of the Spirit seek to restrain the fleshly desires and follow the teachings and desires of the Spirit. [They make a serious business of reading the word of God, meditation, prayer, and thanksgiving. They provide for such things, no matter how full of business is their everyday life, and into it they bring their religion.]Romans 8:6 For the mind of the flesh is death;—To follow the law of the flesh is to bring the mind and spirit into subjection to the law of sin that dwells in the flesh and brings death. [This state of mind, this desire and pursuit of carnal things, is, in its own nature, destructive. It leads to all the Scriptures mean by death, alienation from God, unholiness, and misery.]but the mind of the Spirit is life and peace:—To follow the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus is to foster the spirit that brings us to life with God. This is the only way to fit the soul for companionship with God and the spirits of the heavenly land. We can gain the heavenly home only by being fitted to breathe its atmosphere, to find fellowship with the spirits that dwell there, and to add joy and happiness to its peaceful realms. The church is a training school to fit man for that eternal home; and the teachings of Christ is a discipline, a schooling, to prepare us for that blessed companionship.Romans 8:7because the mind of the flesh is enmity against God;— Paul said: “ I know that in me, that is, in my flesh, dwelleth no good thing.” (Romans 7:18).
Then the flesh in its desires is at enmity with God. [“ Enmity against God” is expressive of an ill feeling toward him. It characterizes a course of conduct. “ Mind of the flesh” is a life, and as such is contrary to God’ s law.
It is, therefore, called “ enmity.” ]for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can it be.—They who are ruled by the flesh cannot be obedient to the law of God. The law of God and the evil tendency of the flesh are two antagonistic things; hence, they must turn away from the rule of the flesh before they can be brought into harmony with God.Romans 8:8and they that are in the flesh cannot please God.—The reason why they cannot please God is because they are constantly sinning against him. The flesh must be brought into subjection to the Spirit before they can be brought into harmony with God. The human spirit cannot gain the mastery over the flesh until it is strengthened by the Spirit of God in Christ Jesus.Romans 8:9 But ye are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you.—If we are in Christ Jesus, the Spirit of God dwells in us; and if the Spirit dwells within, it makes us free from the law of sin that dwells in the flesh. [To be in the flesh is to live the life of the sinner; to be in the Spirit is to live the life of the Christian. The flesh governs the one; the Spirit, the other.]But if any man hath not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.—Unless the law of the Spirit dwells in us and so controls us, we are none of his. If the law of the flesh rules, the law of the Spirit does not dwell within us.
They are antagonistic. [The possession of the Holy Spirit is declared to be absolutely necessary to our being acceptable to God. To be destitute of the Spirit, therefore, is to be destitute of everything well- pleasing in the sight of God.]Romans 8:10 And if Christ is in you,—[In verses 9, 10 are three phrases meaning the same thing—“ the Spirit of God,” “ the Spirit of Christ,” and “ Christ.” He comes from God, the Father (John 14:16; John 14:26; Acts 1:4); he is given in Christ, the Son (Romans 8:2); and does not “ speak from himself” (John 16:13), but manifests “ Christ” (John 14:21).
The threefold mention shows the work of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in the salvation of the believer in Christ.]the body is dead because of sin;—The body, or the flesh, as the ruling power, is dead through Christ to sins to which it would lead.but the spirit is life because of righteousness.—The spirit is life toward him; it leads to the righteousness in Christ. The practice of righteousness comes from life in God, and that righteousness grows stronger by the exercise.Romans 8:11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwelleth in you,—The Holy Spirit actually dwells in every obedient believer. (Acts 2:38; Acts 5:32).he that raised up Christ Jesus from the dead shall give life also to your mortal bodies through his Spirit that dwelleth in you.—God will by that Spirit give life to our dead bodies and raise them to immortal life. [Two things may be included in this part of the verse— (1) that the possession of the Spirit, which is the source of life, is a pledge and security that our bodies shall rise again, because it would be unseemly that bodies thus honored by the Spirit should remain under the dominion of death; and (2) that the resurrection of the saints is evinced by the rising of Jesus; for he is risen not only as their Lord and Judge, but as their head, to which they are united as members of his body, for “ he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead” (Colossians 1:18), as “ the first-fruits,” by which all the lump is sanctified and accepted (Leviticus 23:9-14); so “ now hath Christ been raised from the dead, the first-fruits of them that are asleep” (1 Corinthians 15:20). The children of God are endued with the Holy Spirit, and thereby their bodies become “ the temple of the Holy Spirit.” (1 Corinthians 6:19). Now, as the promise of the Holy Spirit was upon the resurrection of Christ, so the gift and possession of the Spirit is an assurance of the resurrection of all those who are in Christ.]Romans 8:12 So then, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh:—Since all good comes to us by living after the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus, and the law of sin dwelling in the flesh brings evil and death, we are under no obligation to live after the flesh, but are under obligations to God, who has redeemed us, and to ourselves, to live after the Spirit. In following the Spirit we mortify and restrain the deeds of the flesh.Romans 8:13for if ye live after the flesh, ye must die;—This is so because Christians lose spiritual life in proportion as they indulge the appetites and desires of the flesh that are contrary to the teachings of the Lord. If, for example, a Christian indulges in anger, or malice, or any of these passions that the Lord condemns, he is not only violating the word of the Lord, but he is destroying the spiritual man, and weakening it every day, and giving the flesh greater power over the Spirit; and so the flesh will dominate and control the whole man, while the spiritual man languishes and dies.but if by the Spirit ye put to death the deeds of the body, ye shall live.—If through following the law given by the Spirit of life we restrain and control the desires of the flesh, we shall live with Christ.Romans 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God.—[Those thus led are already in Christ, and in them the Holy Spirit dwells.
The leading is both internal and external. To whatever extent the Holy Spirit by its indwelling strengthens the human spirit to enable it to control the flesh, to that extent the leading is internal; to whatever extent the motives of “ the law of the Spirit,” when brought to bear on the heart in the New Testament, enlighten and strengthen, and so enable it to keep the body in subjection, to that extent the leading is external.
The leading, then, consists of the whole of the influences of every kind exercised by the Holy Spirit on the human spirit, enabling it to keep the body under. Hence, the exhortation is given: “ Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling; for it is God who worketh in you both to will and to work, for his good pleasure.” (Philippians 2:12-13).]Romans 8:15 For ye received not the spirit of bondage again unto fear;—[This points to the time when they believed, were baptized, entered into the kingdom, and received the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38), by whom they were led (Romans 8:14). The bondage which throughout this Epistle is contrasted with the liberty of the children of God is the bondage of sin (Romans 6:6; Romans 6:16-17; Romans 6:20; Romans 7:25), and of the corruption of death as the consequence of sin (Romans 8:21). They had all been once under this bondage, which tends unto the fear of death. (Hebrews 2:14-15).]but ye received the spirit of adoption,—In coming into Christ they received not, as under the law, the spirit of bondage, in which they were moved by fear. They had now been adopted as children into the family of God and received the spirit of children. [The reference here is a Roman legal process by which one man took another’ s to be his own son. The adopted son took the name and rank of the one adopting him and stood in exactly the same legal relation to him as a born son.]whereby we cry, Abba, Father.—Having been adopted as a child into the family of God, they could cry, “ Father.” “ Abba” is the Chaldee word for “ father.” Whenever it occurs (Mark 14:36; Galatians 4:6; and here), it has the Greek interpretation subjoined to it.
This is apparently to be explained by the fact that the Chaldee, though frequent in prayer, gradually acquired the nature of a most sacred proper name, to which the Greek-speaking Jews added the appellation from their own tongue. Under Christ the heart is touched with love, and we come to love God because he first loved us; but under Moses they served from fear; under Christ, from love.Romans 8:16 The Spirit himself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are children of God:—The Spirit gives directions through the word of truth how to become children of God.
Our spirits bear witness as to whether from the heart we have complied with these conditions, and so they jointly bear testimony that we are children of God. When it is established that we have become God’ s children, there must be the conjoint testimony of the two witnesses that we continue in the faith. The Holy Spirit gives directions as to the kind of life we are to live, and our own spirit bears testimony as to whether we conform our life to these instructions. But the Holy Spirit, through this testimony or witness, molds the human spirit into his own likeness, dwells with our spirit, directs our spirit; so that the same spirit that was in Christ Jesus dwells in us. We are led by the Spirit, and through us the Spirit of God acts and works, because our spirit is imbued with the purposes, thoughts, temper, and being of the divine Spirit. So, then, if we faithfully bear the fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23), there is a happy and harmonious union of the Spirit with our spirit that brings confidence and assurance to our heart that enables us to cry: “ Behold what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called children of God; and such we are.” (1 John 3:1).Romans 8:17and if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ;—If the Spirit of God and our spirit give assurance that we have been adopted as children of God, we know that we become heirs of his inheritance and joint heirs with Jesus, the only begotten Son of God.if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified with him.—As children we must share the sufferings of Jesus here that we may be glorified with him in the future state. “ For if we died with him, we shall also live with him: if we endure, we shall also reign with him.” (2 Timothy 2:11-12). “ Beloved, now are we children of God, and it is not yet made manifest what we shall be.
We know that, if he shall be manifested, we shall be like him; for we shall see him even as he is.” (1 John 3:2). We are heirs with him of all his glory.Romans 8:18 For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time—[This is not merely a supposition or opinion, but the conclusion drawn from comparing things present and things to come, that the former are of no weight or worth in comparison.]are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed to us-ward.—Paul suffered much as a follower of Christ, but he says it was too insignificant to be compared with the glory to be revealed to us-ward. “ For our light affliction, which is for the moment, worketh for us more and more exceedingly an eternal weight of glory.” (2 Corinthians 4:17).
In that eternal state all who have been adopted into the family of God will share with Christ his eternal glory.Romans 8:19 For the earnest expectation of the creation waiteth for the revealing of the sons of God.—The “ creation” here means the world, embracing all animated nature below man. The sin of man brought a curse upon the earth, and mortality and death came upon all creatures, and they are represented as earnestly waiting for the appearance of the sons of God from the grave, when the world will be delivered from the curse under which it labors on account of the sins of man, its ruler. [Paul personifies the world, just as the prophets do when they make the floods and trees clap their hands. (Psalms 98:8; Isaiah 55:12). It is one of the frequent figures of speech thus to make nature sympathize with man. When the Assyrians were overthrown, Jehovah said: “ I caused Lebanon to mourn for him, and all the trees of the field fainted for him.” (Ezekiel 31:15). In the passage before us, human feelings are ascribed to inanimate things without reason. Under this figure is presented the truth revealed in the Old Testament that the whole world of nature placed under man’ s dominion has a real concern in the past history and future destiny of man.
When God said to Adam, “ Cursed is the ground for thy sake; in toil shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life” (Genesis 3:17) ; when he punished man’ s wickedness by bringing the flood, in which “ every living thing was destroyed that was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and creeping things, and birds of the heavens; and they were destroyed from the earth” (Genesis 7:23) ; and when “ the earth also is polluted under the inhabitants thereof; because they have transgressed the laws, violated the statutes, broken the everlasting covenant. Therefore hath the curse devoured the earth, and they that dwell therein are found guilty: therefore the inhabitants of the earth are burned, and few men left.
The new wine mourneth, the vine languisheth, all the merry-hearted do sigh” (Isaiah 24:5-7). In all such passages the same truth is expressed that “ the creation was subjected to vanity.” ]Romans 8:20 For the creation was subjected to vanity,—As a result of Adam’ s sin, the whole creation was cursed and fell away from its original design and became subject to the reign of death. [The word is, therefore, appropriately used of the disappointing character of present existence, which nowhere reaches the perfection of which it is capable.]not of its own will,—Not of its own fault or action, but through the sin of man, which brought mortality and death upon the creation.but by reason of him who subjected it, in hope—[This, in accordance with the history, can be no other than God. He who first placed the creation under man’ s dominion also subjected it to the effects of man’ s sin (Genesis 3:17-19; Genesis 5:29), and will make it partaker of the blessing of his restoration.]Romans 8:21that the creation itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the liberty of the glory of the children of God.—The hope is entertained that when the deliverance comes to the children of God, when they are delivered from the bondage of corruption and from the prison house of the grave, then the whole creation will share this deliverance and be freed from the corruption and mortality to which it has been subjected by the sin of man. It shared the corruption and mortality of man’ s sin, and will share his deliverance from it.Romans 8:22 For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.—The whole creation suffered from the effects of man’ s sin. It is represented as suffering and groaning in its mortality and together travailing in pain. Animated nature suffers, vegetable nature struggles against, but succumbs to, death and decay, and the laws of all nature are disturbed and in commotion on account of man’ s sin. [These pangs of a world in travail cannot be unmeaning.
They point to a coming time of delivery, when, “ according to his promise, we look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.” (2 Peter 3:13).]Romans 8:23 And not only so, but ourselves also,—Not only does the whole creation thus groan, but even Christians, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan and suffer within themselves.who have the first-fruits of the Spirit,—[The first fruits were that portion of the productions of the earth which were offered to God. (Exodus 23:19; Exodus 34:26; Leviticus 23:10-12). From the nature of the case, they contained the evidence and assurance of the whole harvest being secured.
The idea, therefore, of an earnest or pledge is included in the phrase, as well as that of priority. This is the general, if not the constant, use of the word in the New Testament. Thus Christ is called “ the first- fruits of them that are asleep” (1 Corinthians 15:20), not merely because he rose first, but also because his resurrection was a pledge of the resurrection of those who “ are Christ’ s at his coming.” In the following passages—Romans 11:16; Romans 16:5; 1 Corinthians 16:15; James 1:18— both ideas may be, and possibly ought to be, retained. In the passages before us what is called “ the first-fruits of the Spirit” is elsewhere (2 Corinthians 1:22; 2 Corinthians 5:5; Ephesians 1:14) called “ the earnest of the Spirit.” The phrases, “ the first-fruits of the Spirit” and “ the earnest of the Spirit,” are, therefore, synonymous. The expression, therefore, is descriptive of all Christians and not of any particular class of them.]even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for our adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.—[The word “ adoption” is applied to two very different events in the life of the redeemed. It is applied to their entrance into the kingdom of God at their conversion.
They, therefore, enter it by being “ born of water and the Spirit.” (John 3:5). Into the everlasting kingdom they shall enter by being born from the grave.
From a grave in the water they emerge into the kingdom of God here on earth; from a grave in the earth, into the everlasting kingdom. Hence, though the two events denoted by adoption stand wide apart and are entirely distinct, yet they resemble each other very closely— so much so, indeed, that the same word is used to express them both.] Christians are waiting for the redemption of their bodies from mortality and suffering. Their redemption in Christ will not be completed until their bodies are raised from the dead and glorified and are become like Jesus in his glorified and immortal state. Paul has in these verses presented to us the far-reaching and appalling results of sin, and has given to us a picture of the future glorious state that shall come to man and earth when the deliverance from sin is completed. The earth will rejoice and be glad as well as man.Romans 8:24 For in hope were we saved:—[This verse and the following seem to depend upon the mention of “ waiting” in verse 23. Now, this waiting is the very substance and essence of hope.
When we believed in Christ, we believed in one who will return again and receive us to himself.] When we were baptized into Christ, we were baptized into one who died and rose again, in the assured hope that if we have been planted in the likeness of his death and been made partakers of it, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection and be made at last fully partakers of it. But as regards the adoption and redemption of our bodies, it is future, and so is an object of hope; and so faith, so far as the renewal and spiritualizing of the body is concerned (1 Corinthians 15:44), “ is assurance of things hoped for” (Hebrews 11:1).
The assurance of the last six verses gives us hope of the immortal state to come; and by this hope we are strengthened to continue to labor and suffer for the promised blessings.but hope that is seen is not hope: for who hopeth for that which he seeth?—The things that are present, that we now enjoy, are not objects of hope; for who hopes for that which he now possesses ? Hope looks to the future blessings.Romans 8:25 But if we hope for that which we see not, then do we with patience wait for it.—But if we hope for treasures now out of reach, that we expect hereafter to gain, then we bear with patience present labors and delays needful to gain them.Romans 8:26 And in like manner the Spirit also helpeth our infirmity: —Not only does hope buoy us up and strengthen us, but the Spirit of God that dwells within us helpeth our weaknesses.for we know not how to pray as we ought; but the Spirit himself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered;—Although we have no definite conception of what we desire, and cannot state in fit language in our prayer, but only disclose it by inarticulate groanings, yet God receives these groanings as acceptable prayers, inasmuch as they come from a soul full of the Holy Spirit. The spirit of the child of God often desires blessings that he cannot express in language. It is God’ s Spirit that dwells in him that leads to do this and secures blessings for which he does not know how to ask.Romans 8:27and he that searcheth the hearts—[This is a common paraphrase for God, and here most appropriate.]knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit,—As no man knoweth the thoughts of a man save the spirit of man that dwells in him, to read those unexpressed emotions of the soul is the prerogative of that Being to whose eyes all things are naked and opened. “ I, Jehovah, search the mind, I try the heart, even to give every man according to his ways, according to the fruit of his doings.” (Jeremiah 17:10).because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God.—The Spirit dwells in and intercedes for the saint only as he brings himself in life and heart into conformity with the will of God. So the Spirit dwells in his heart and molds the desires and groanings of his own spirit, and through directing his spirit in prayer the Holy Spirit makes intercession.Romans 8:28 And we know that to them that love God all things work together for good,—The purpose of God is to call the worthy and true souls of humanity into his church and to discipline and educate them so as to fit them to dwell with him in his eternal home; and to those who love him and are called in harmony with his purpose, all things work together for good. When he says “ all things,” he means even things that are painful; for even if affliction, poverty, imprisonment, hunger, death, or any other thing, come upon them, God is able to turn all things to their good and fit them for his eternal home.
If they are not able to bear the trials and afflictions that come upon them and accept them as means of discipline from the hand of the Father, they judge themselves unworthy of eternal life. If they fail to do his requirements, they deprive themselves of the education that will fit them for service in the eternal kingdom.even to them that are called—These have been called by the gospel, and accepted it.
Many others are called, Jews and Gentiles; but only those who hear and obey are God’ s chosen ones. (Matthew 22:14).according to his purpose.—God determined that man should be called by the gospel; hence, to be called according to God’ s purpose is to be called by the gospel. In speaking of this call, Paul said: “ But we are bound to give thanks to God always for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, for that God chose you from the beginning unto salvation in sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth: whereunto he called you through our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.” (2 Thessalonians 2:13-14).Romans 8:29 For whom he foreknew, he also foreordained to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren:—Here he proves the assertion of the preceding verse by the blessing conferred upon those who were faithful to him in past ages. Of them it is said: “ And these all, having had witness borne to them through their faith, received not the promise, God having provided some better thing concerning us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect.” (Hebrews 11:39-40). They were not perfected until the provision was made through Christ. The promise was not fulfilled while they were still living under the old dispensation. “ And for this cause he is the mediator of a new covenant, that a death having taken place for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first covenant, they that have been called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance.” (Hebrews 9:15). The transgressions of the first covenant were not removed till Christ died.
God ordained that these ancient worthies should be conformed to the image or likeness of his Son, that he might be the first born from the grave among many brethren. He came forth from the grave. “ And the tombs were opened; and many bodies of the saints that had fallen asleep were raised; and coming forth out of the tombs after his resurrection they entered into the holy city and appeared unto many.” (Matthew 27:52-53).Romans 8:30and whom he foreordained, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.—These ancient worthies whom he had thus ordained to be conformed to the image of Jesus Christ he called from their tombs, justified them, and glorified them with Jesus at the throne of God.
It is probable that they ascended with Jesus in his triumphal train, as predicted by David: “ Lift up your heads, O ye gates; and be ye lifted up, ye everlasting doors: and the King of glory will come in. Who is the King of glory? Jehovah strong and mighty, Jehovah mighty in battle. Lift up your heads, O ye gates; yea, lift them up, ye everlasting doors: and the King of glory will come in. Who is this King of glory? Jehovah of hosts, he is the King of glory.” (Psalms 24:7-10).
The risen and glorified Christ was the first to enter. “ But Christ having come a high priest of the good things to come, . . . entered in once for all into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption.” (Hebrews 9:11-12). This is given in explanation of how all things work together for good to them that love God, and is an assurance that those who are faithful children of God shall share his immortal glories in the world to come.Romans 8:31 What then shall we say to these things?—From all that has been said, what comfort may we derive from it ?
We are persecuted and despised, it is true; but as God has called us to love him, and all things work together for good to them that love him, and if we continue to possess that faith that works by love, it will bring us, both body and soul, to his eternal glory. Seeing therefore, that all these things are so, what comfort in our tribulation shall we derive from them?If God is for us, who is against us?—No being is, and none can be. God is for us, and as long as that is true we have nothing to fear.Romans 8:32 He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all,—If God so loved us that he did not spare his own Son, but delivered him up to suffer for us, will he not with him freely give us all things needed to gain the salvation Jesus died to gain for us?how shall he not also with him freely give us all things?—Inasmuch as God has done the greater in giving the most precious Being in his sight, he will with him give all less costly gifts that are needed to perfect our salvation. May I not ask, if God has so freely made such provisions for man’ s salvation, can we believe that he will permit a single soul willing to accept the gospel and be saved through it to die without the knowledge of it? The Spirit declared through Peter: “ Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: but in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is acceptable to him.” (Acts 10:35). He declared this on the occasion that God sent the gospel to Cornelius, a Gentile, because he saw that he was desirous of knowing and doing the will of God.
If God is no respecter of persons and he chose Abraham while he was an idolater, Paul while a persecutor, Cornelius and Lydia in the midst of idolatry, because he saw they were anxious to know and do the truth and had courage and perseverance to be true to it to the end, we may rest assured that he has never permitted, nor will he ever permit, a single soul with the same willingness and ability to know and continue in the truth to perish without the knowledge of the same.Romans 8:33 Who shall lay anything to the charge of God’ s elect?— Who shall lay anything to the charge of those whom God has selected and purified.It is God that justifieth;—When he justifies through his own Son, who can condemn ? This is to show the fullness and sufficiency of God’ s care and his blessings for us.
God and his Son and all his servants are for us; who, save the enemy of all, is against us? Who can effect anything to our hurt?Romans 8:34who is he that condemneth?—No human tribunal, no earthly judge can condemn. All judgment has been committed to the Son, who is our Advocate with the Father. (1 John 2:1). [In support of this assertion the four great facts about Christ Jesus are here presented.]It is Christ Jesus that died,—[All ground of condemnation is removed by his death for our sins.]yea rather, that was raised from the dead,—His resurrection as the evidence of the validity of all his claims is a much more decisive proof of the security of all who trust in him than his death could be, for by it he was proven to be the Son of God. In his speech before the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers at Athens, Paul said: “ The times of ignorance therefore God overlooked; but now he commandeth men that they should all everywhere repent: inasmuch as he hath appointed a day in which he will judge the world in righteousness by the man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.” (Acts 17:30-31). Another inspired man says: “ Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to his great mercy begat us again unto a living hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead” (1 Peter 1:3).who is at the right hand of God,— [This solemn investure with power “ in heaven and on earth” is with express reference to the salvation of his people. (Matthew 28:18-20; John 17:2; Ephesians 1:20-23).]who also maketh intercession for us.—He stands at the throne of God ready to plead our cause. He has already propitiated the favor of God to the whole world through the sacrifice of himself in its behalf.
If he found joy in enduring the cross and despising the shame for us when we were sinners, how much more ready must he be to offer petitions in behalf of his erring disciples! (1 John 2:1).Romans 8:35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?—If God is for us, justifies us, and Jesus is our Advocate at the right hand of God, and the Holy Spirit dwells within us and intercedes for us with groanings that cannot be uttered, who shall separate us from love that so guards us?shall tribulation, or anguish, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?—Shall we let the things brought upon us to school and fit us for the enjoyment of the eternal honors God has for us in heaven, discourage, dishearten, and turn us back and cause us to forfeit those honors and glories purchased for us by the blood of Jesus Christ, our Redeemer?Romans 8:36 Even as it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we were accounted as sheep for the slaughter.—The whole Psalm refers to the suffering of God’ s people, and this verse is typical of what the followers of Christ would suffer for his name. This was all trial and suffering to discipline them for eternal honors.
It was a part of the present suffering that would work out for them a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory.Romans 8:37 Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors— Instead of drawing back from suffering for Jesus’ sake, or forsaking him because of tribulation through these, we are to be crowned more than conquerors. [But who can be “ more” than a conqueror? Certainly he that cannot be conquered. These sufferings are a mighty battle, but we come through them more than victors. We gloriously triumph.]through him that loved us.—[This cry of triumph is not selfish, for the abounding cry is: through Jesus, our Lord, who loved us and died for us.] His dying for us is the manifestation of love for us that begets the heroism in man that leads him to rejoice in sufferings for the sake of Jesus and the good of man.Romans 8:38-39 For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor death, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.—To persuade is to win to a purpose or course where there are difficulties, of which the testimony commingled with the earnest desire convinces that it can be accomplished. Earnest, self-sacrificing for the accomplishment of the desired end gains acceptance for the prayer and secures the blessing. Without this earnestness of heart that makes us willing to sacrifice to God, our prayers will not reach the throne of God and will not prevail.
It may not be necessary to sacrifice all for what we pray before God will hear and answer the prayer, but it is necessary that we in heart be willing to labor and sacrifice to gain the end before God will hear and answer the prayer. With this truth understood we need not be surprised that so few of our prayers are heard or answered.
Jesus Christ himself is the great and perfect example in all these things to the child of God. The thing needed to gain acceptance and favor for our prayers is earnest self-sacrificing labor and devotion on our part to gain that for which we pray. Then God will hear and grant our prayers even before we ask. The great trouble with us is we are not in earnest in our service, it is not rendered from the heart, and our prayers are vain, talking without corresponding deeds of devotion. What is needed for our own good and the good of the world is to realize that our religious lives should be more earnest and devoted. We can make our prayers prevailing if we will, but we cannot do this without self-sacrifice like that made by those who did prevail with God and whose examples are given for our encouragement and imitation.
“THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS”
Chapter Eight IN THIS CHAPTER
-
To appreciate the place the Holy Spirit has in the lives of Christians
-
To notice the power to overcome sin which is available in Christ
-
To realize the extent of God’s love toward us
SUMMARY In chapter seven, Paul described the dilemma of a man who becomes a prisoner of the law of sin which is in the members of his body. In the last few verses, Paul made reference to the hope of liberation made possible by God through Jesus Christ. In this chapter, Paul amplifies on the freedom from sin found in Christ.
First, for those in Christ who are walking according to the Spirit, there is no condemnation for sin, for the death of Christ for sin has set us free from the law of sin and death by fulfilling the requirement of the law (Romans 8:1-4). Second, by setting our minds on the things of the Spirit and not the flesh, we are able to enjoy life and peace, pleasing God (Romans 8:5-8). And third, we now enjoy the indwelling of the Spirit of God, by whom we can put to death the deeds of the body and enjoy both present and future blessings as the children of God (Romans 8:9-17).
The blessings of being God’s children are enlarged upon in the rest of the chapter. Our present sufferings mean nothing in view of our ultimate redemption and revealing for which we eagerly and patiently wait (Romans 8:18-25). We have the privilege of the Holy Spirit and Jesus interceding for us when we pray, which assures that all things will work together for good for those called according to God’s purpose (Romans 8:26-30). Finally, as God’s elect we have the assurance that nothing can tear us away from God’s love and that in all things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us (Romans 8:31-39).
OUTLINE I. IN CHRIST THERE IS FREEDOM FROM SIN (Romans 8:1-17) A. FREEDOM FROM THE OF SIN (Romans 8:1-4)1. Available to those in Christ, made possible by the law of the Spirit of life (Romans 8:1-2) 2. An accomplishment not attained by the Law, but by the death of Christ (Romans 8:3-4)
B. FREEDOM FROM THE POWER OF SIN (Romans 8:5-17)1. To those who set their minds on the things of the Spirit, not the flesh, pleasing God (Romans 8:5-8) 2. To those who have the indwelling Holy Spirit (Romans 8:9-11) 3. To those who by the Spirit put to death the deeds of the body (Romans 8:12-13) 4. To those thus led, who are the children of God and joint heirs with Christ (Romans 8:14-17)
II. OF BEING OF GOD (Romans 8:18-39) A. THE GLORY TO BE IN US (Romans 8:18-25)1. Present sufferings don’t even compare (Romans 8:18) 2. The whole creation eagerly awaits for the revealing and glorious liberty of the children of God (Romans 8:19-22) 3. We also eagerly wait with perseverance for this hope (Romans 8:23-25)
B. THE HELP OF THE HOLY SPIRIT (Romans 8:26-27)1. Helps in our weakness as we pray (Romans 8:26 a) 2. By interceding for us as we pray (Romans 8:26-27)
C. ALL THINGS WORKING FOR GOOD (28-30)1. For those who love God, called according to His purpose (28) 2. For such, whom God foreknew, He will carry out His ultimate purpose (Romans 8:29-30)
D. GOD’S LOVE TOWARD HIS ELECT (Romans 8:31-39)1. God, who spared not His own Son, is on our side (Romans 8:31-33) 2. Christ, who died for us, now intercedes for us at God’s right hand (Romans 8:34) 3. Through such love we are more than conquerors over all things (Romans 8:35-39)
WORDS TO PONDER law of the Spirit of life - 1) possibly an expression referring to the Gospel; or, 2) the law (principle) involving the life-giving Spirit who aids those in Christ to become free of the “law of sin and death” in their members (cf. Romans 7:23 with Romans 8:11-13)
the Spirit, Spirit of God, Spirit of Christ, Spirit of Him - various references to the Holy Spirit
the creation - various explanations are often given: 1) all of mankind; 2) only the saved; 3) the whole physical creation placed under the curse (Genesis 3:17 Genesis 8:21; Revelation 22:3), using the kind of language found in Psalms 98:7-9; Psalms 148:1-14. predestined - predetermined; note carefully in Romans 8:29 that it is based upon “foreknowledge” (cf. 1 Peter 1:2), and that which is predetermined is WHAT those in Christ are to become, not WHO are to be in Christ
elect - chosen; according to 1 Peter 1:2, this election is based upon God’s foreknowledge, not some arbitrary choice
intercedes - to make a petition on behalf of another; used of the Holy Spirit in Romans 8:26-27 (interceding as a “translator”?), and of Christ in Romans 8:34 (interceding as “defense counsel”?)
REVIEW FOR THE CHAPTER
- List the main points of this chapter- In Christ There Is Freedom From Sin (Romans 8:1-17)
- Blessings Of Being Children Of God (Romans 8:18-39)
-
What is the main difference between the “law of Moses” and the “law of the Spirit of life”? (Romans 8:2-4)- The Law of Moses could not set one free from the “law of sin and death”
-
What is the result of setting your mind on the things of the flesh? On the things of the Spirit? (Romans 8:6)- Death; life and peace
-
Do the Scriptures teach that the Holy Spirit dwells in the Christian? (Romans 8:9-11)- Yes
-
How can we assure that we will continue to live spiritually? (Romans 8:13)- By putting to death the deeds of the body with the help of the Spirit
-
List briefly the blessings of being the children of God (Romans 8:14-39)- One day we will be glorified together with Christ
- We have the help of the Holy Spirit
- All things ultimately work for our good
- Nothing can separate us from God’s love
Verse 1 This great chapter is, in a sense, the heart of Romans, being a shout of victory contrasting with the wail of despair which closed the seventh, the transition from the bleak and depressing condition of the unregenerated there, to the enthusiastic and joyful optimism of the eighth, being signaled by the adverb “now.” “There is therefore NOW no condemnation, etc.” Thus, in the very first clause of this chapter, one encounters the dramatic affirmation and proof that the condition just described in Romans 7 was not describing Paul’s or any other Christian’s experience, but was a depiction of something prior to and diverse from the situation prevailing “now.” Brunner commented on this fact thus: With a sharp turn, Paul now breaks off reflections on man under the Law; again, a “now” stands here as the signal of the new train of thought.[1]Actually, Paul here returned to a train of thought he had already followed inRomans 5 and Romans 6; but he took it up here again, following the interruption of Romans 7, that theme being the blessing and privilege of the life “in Christ.” ENDNOTE: [1] Emil Brunner, The Letter to the Romans (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1956), p. 69. There is therefore now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus. (Romans 8:1) Seven times already in this letter, Paul had stressed the significance of being “in Christ.” Faith (Romans 3:26), redemption (Romans 3:24), peace (Romans 5:1), rejoicing in God (Romans 5:11), abundance of grace and of the gifts of righteousness (Romans 5:17), being alive unto God (Romans 6:11), and eternal life (Romans 6:22), were all mentioned by Paul as blessings available to man “in Christ” and nowhere else. The expression “in Christ” opens and closes this chapter, and no understanding of Paul’s gospel is possible without emphasis upon this concept. What does it mean to be “in Christ”? Smedes wrote: Incorporation into Christ means, in practice, incorporation into the church. The church is the social organism which forms Christ’s earthly body now … Being in the church, incorporated into it by baptism, the Christian is in Christ himself.[2]This view is disparaged by some as sacramentalist; but Paul himself stated exactly this conception in his declarations that people are baptized into “one body” (which is the church) (1 Corinthians 12:13), and that all Christians are likewise “baptized into Christ” (Romans 6:3; Galatians 3:26-27). Of course, being “in Christ” means far more than mere enrollment in an earthly society that calls itself a church. Being truly “in Christ” means having been born again, having believed with all the heart, having received the remission of sins and the Holy Spirit of promise (Ephesians 1:13), walking in newness of life, rejoicing in the hope of the glory of God, etc.; in short, it means having become a partaker of the salvation Christ came to deliver. However, the participation in community is without any doubt included.
No man is an island; and since it it true that, from the very beginning, God added to the church those that were being saved (Acts 2:47), it is axiomatic that one not in the church is not saved either. This view does not fit in with modern man’s passion to be relieved of any obligation toward the church; but it is nevertheless the viewpoint of the word of God. The Scriptures affirm that Christ gave his blood for the church (Acts 20:28); and no philosophy of religion that downgrades the church and reduces it to a non-essential status can ever be reconciled with such a truth as this. If men may truly be saved without the church for which Jesus shed his blood, then the death of Christ upon Calvary is reduced to futility. No condemnation … refers to man’s justification, defined negatively as a state wherein is no condemnation. The ground of justification is the perfect righteousness in Christ; and it includes the perfect faith and obedience of Christ, in whom the righteousness of God truly exists; and the availability of that righteousness of Christ for the salvation of sinners does not derive from some magical transfer of Christ’s righteousness to them in consequence of the sinner’s faith nor of anything else that the sinner might either believe or do; but it derives from the fact of the sinner’s being transferred into Christ Jesus where the righteousness is. Briefly, salvation is not procured by the transfer of righteousness to the sinner, but by the transfer of the sinner into Christ. The addition to this verse found in the KJV has been rejected by the scholars on what surely appears to be sound critical judgment, because it is not found in any of the oldest manuscripts that have been handed down through history. There is a plausible explanation of the error by Murray, who wrote: It is most likely that it was inserted from the end of Rom 8:4 in the course of transcription.[3][2] Lewis B. Smedes, All Things Made New (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1970), p. 86. [3] John Murray, The Epistle to the Romans (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1968), 1p. 275. Verse 2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus made me free from the law of sin and death.The law … as used here, has troubled the commentators, especially those who were concerned with removing the concept of law from Christianity and making it a system of “faith alone.” Nevertheless, Paul here used exactly the same word that previously was applied to the Mosaic institution; and this affords dogmatic proof that there are indeed rules, regulations, commandments, and ordinances connected with faith “in Christ” that are in the fullest sense of that word, “the law of God.” The new system of Christianity is here called “the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus”; and, although a law of liberty, deliverance, and freedom from bondage, the requirements of it may not be ignored, but must be observed. Nor is this an isolated reference to Christianity in which such terminology is discovered. Paul himself wrote of certain persons who were spoken of as “without law,” that is, without Moses’ law; but of the same persons, Paul said they were “under law to Christ!’ (1 Corinthians 9:21). Thus, freedom from Moses’ law does not mean freedom from the higher law “in Christ.” All people are under obligation to obey Christ. Paul called such obligations “the law of Christ” (Galatians 6:2); James called them “the perfect law of liberty” (James 1:25), “the royal law” (James 2:8), and “the law of liberty” (James 2:12). Thus, the very gospel itself is “a law” that mortals are required to observe and obey upon pain of eternal condemnation if they neglect, refuse, or fail to do so (1 Peter 4:17; 2 Thessalonians 1:8-9).
Any and all of the commandments of Jesus Christ are components of that “law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus,” which Paul mentioned here. That the commandments of Jesus Christ are actually endowed with binding and legal status as the irrevocable law of God appears in the words of the Master himself, and in that very portion of the scriptures usually recognized as the very constitution of Christianity. Christ said, Whosoever shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 5:19). If then Christianity is, at least in part, a system of law, what about the question of legalism? Who is a legalist? A legalist is one who obeys the rules and regulations of Christianity, at least to some extent, and then falls into the error of supposing that he has thereby merited salvation, and as a result of such error develops an attitude of self-righteousness similar to that of the ancient Pharisees. Never in a million years could it be correct to define a legalist as one who shah “do and teach” the commandments of Christ, for Jesus said of such a person as that, that he “shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” The practical use of the term “legalist” today is as an epithet hurled at persons who reject the heresy of salvation by “faith only.” There are two laws in view in this verse, the law of Moses from which people have been liberated through Christ, and “the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus,” the latter being synonymous with what might be called the law of the gospel of Christ. There is a sharp contrast between these two laws, one being called the law of sin and death, the other being referred to as the law of the Spirit of life. Although both systems are quite properly referred to by the Holy Spirit himself as “law,” the difference between them is the difference between noon and midnight. On the very first day that the law of Moses went into effect, three thousand. souls disobeyed it and were put to death (Exodus 32:28); on the very first day the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus went into effect, three thousand souls heard the word of God, believed in Christ, repented of their sins and were baptized for the remission of sins, thus being saved (Acts 2:37-47). Three thousand died at the unveiling of the law of Moses; three thousand were saved at the unveiling of the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus. Some writers make the “law of sin and death” here apply to the law Paul mentioned in Romans 7:23; but these words apply also. if not exclusively, to the law of Moses. Barrett’s paraphrase of this verse is: For the religion that is made possible in Christ Jesus, namely, that of the life-giving Spirit, liberates from the old religion which is abused by sin and leads to death.[4]Moule likewise understood this as a reference to the law of Moses, thus: To call that sacred Code, the Decalogue, “the law of sin and death” is not to say that it is sinful and deathful. It need only mean, and we think it does mean, that it is sin’s occasion and death’s warrant, by the unrelieved collision of its holiness with man’s fallen will.[5]The Spirit of life … is the Holy Spirit, because of no other spirit could it be said that such is the Spirit of life. He is the blessed Spirit, a member of the godhead, who takes up residence in Christian hearts in consequence of their being sons of God (Galatians 4:6), and in fulfillment of the apostolic promise of such an indwelling to all believers who will repent and be baptized for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38 f), and is thus identifiable as the “Holy Spirit of promise” (Ephesians 1:13). Thus the residence of the Holy Spirit in Christian hearts is not for the purpose of making them sons of God, but in consequence of their already being so; despite this, the continued indwelling of the Spirit is of such vast consequence that true sonship cannot exist without it (Romans 8:9). Moreover, even the resurrection of the believer at last is dependent upon this same Spirit, as indicated in Romans 8:11. [4] C. K. Barrett, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans (New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1957), p. 153. [5] H. C. G. Moule, The Epistle to the Romans (London: Pickering and Inglis, Ltd.), p. 211. Verse 3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh.The law of Moses could not make people perfect, due to the weakness of people themselves in being unable to live according to its tenets. There were also certain other limitations in that ancient divine law, there having been no provision for the impartation of God’s Spirit to help people, and no absolute forgiveness, there having been a remembrance of sin made again every year, even after observance of the ceremonies which typically “removed” them. (See under Romans 10:2 in my Commentary on Hebrews.) The law could not extend justification to people except upon the premise of perfect obedience, and the weakness of all flesh prevented such a thing from ever occurring. God sending his own Son … Jesus came into the world to achieve perfection as a man and upon man’s behalf. He came to fulfill the whole will of God, to obey God’s every word of commandment, and to “fulfill all righteousness.” Christ’s faith was perfect; his obedience was perfect; his love of the Father was perfect; he was totally perfect. In Christ, therefore, is the righteousness which alone can save people; and, as to the manner of this righteousness being made available for the salvation of sinners, see under Romans 8:1. As David Lipscomb wrote: Jesus Christ came as the perfect embodiment of obedience to the law of God, and with the purpose of inspiring others with the same spirit and leading all who trust in him to the same obedience from the heart to the law of God.[6]In the likeness of sinful flesh … Here is a precise distinction. The apostle did not declare that Jesus came “in” the sinful flesh, but “in the likeness” of it, the significance of this lying in the fact that our Lord’s flesh was not sinful, but only like the flesh of sinful people, their flesh being sinful, not from birth, but through the practice of sin. Perhaps people may never know why it was so absolutely necessary that God should become a man in the person of Christ, down to the very last details of conception and birth, and with all the normal attributes and characteristics of people, even to the suffering of weariness, pain, and death; but the fact of that necessity is apparent, not merely in the act of incarnation itself, but in all of the typical and prophetic representations of it, as for example when Moses lifted up the brazen serpent in the wilderness, the healing serpent being “like” poisonous ones (Numbers 21:8)! But why did Paul use such an expression as “the likeness of sinful flesh,” an expression found nowhere else in the word of God? True, Paul used such expressions as “made of the seed of David according to the flesh” (Romans 1:3), “manifested in the flesh” (1 Timothy 3:16), and “made in the likeness of men” (Philippians 2:7); but the use of such an expression here must have fulfilled some special purpose. Murray’s exegesis provides a plausible explanation, thus: He is using the term “likeness” not for the purpose of suggesting any unreality in respect of our Lord’s human nature. That would contradict Paul’s express language elsewhere in this epistle and in his other epistles. He is under the necessity of using this word here because he uses the term “sinful flesh”; and he could net have said that Christ was sent in “sinful flesh.” That would have contradicted the sinlessness of Jesus for which the New Testament is jealous throughout. So the question is, Why did Paul use the term sinful flesh, when it is necessary to guard so jealously the sinlessness of our Lord’s flesh? He is concerned to show that when the Father sent the Son into this world of sin, of misery, and of death, he sent him in the manner that brought him into closest relation to sinful humanity that it was possible for him to have without becoming sinful himself. He himself was holy and undefiled - the word “likeness” guards this truth. But he came in the same human nature; and that is the purpose of saying “sinful flesh.” No other combination of terms could have fulfilled these purposes so perfectly.[7]Let it be noted, however, that the flesh of humanity is sinful, not from birth or by nature, but from the practice of sin. And for sin … is Paul’s way of stating the purpose of Christ’s coming into the world. It was on account of sin, to deal with sin, to provide an atonement for sin, to condemn sin in the flesh, as stated a moment later. Condemn sin in the flesh … does not mean to condemn the people who sinned, the law of Moses having been far more than sufficient for such a purpose as that, but to condemn sin in the sense of taking away its dominion over people, stripping sin of its power to hold the entire race of man captive in sin. This expression reminds one of Paul’s saying that Jesus “led captivity captive and gave gifts unto men” (Ephesians 4:8). Here the meaning is that Christ condemned the condemnation due to sin, and sin, almost personified, is said to be itself condemned. The law of God to the effect that sin deserved the penalty of death could not be thrust aside and merely ignored; the penalty had to be executed; and, in the weakness and sinfulness of humanity, there appeared to be no hope whatever that this penalty could be removed by the actual living of a pure and holy life. Thus, it was necessary that if the penalty should be enforced and at the same time humanity spared, it was mandatory that the Holy One should descend from above and pay it himself upon their behalf. That is what Jesus did!
To provide such a great gift on behalf of man was the purpose of Christ’s coming into this world. As Brunner commented: God’s Son had to assume the sinful flesh (the likeness of it) in order to be able to bear and take away its burden. Godhood and manhood had to be in an incomprehensible manner united in it so that God’s law could really be fulfilled.[8][6] David Lipscomb, A Commentary on the New Testament Epistles (Nashville, Tennessee: The Gospel Advocate Company, 1969), p. 143. [7] John Murray, op. cit., I, p. 280. [8] Emil Brunner, op. cit., p. 68. Verse 4 That the ordinance of the law might be fulfilled is us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.The great purpose of Christ’s redemptive act was this, that people might keep all the law of God. The purpose of salvation in Christ, far from being that of mere imputation from without of a righteousness to mankind through such a device as the sinner’s faith, was, on the other hand, concerned with the enabling of people to observe all of God’s commandments in a true spirit of love and obedience, such becoming possible through the means here presented, that of walking after the Spirit and not after the flesh. That the ordinance of the law might be fulfilled in us … shows that God’s purpose with reference to his commandments has been invariable from all eternity, and that God’s purpose has not been diverted or diminished with regard to those who are called Christians. The manner of fulfilling God’s commandments, however, has undergone a marvelous transformation in the new covenant. Whereas under the Old Testament regime, attention was directed to specific commandments of “thou shalt not” do this and “thou shalt” do that, under the New Testament system the believer in Christ lives a life of love and harmony with the Spirit of God. Paul earlier said that the law of Moses was spiritual (Romans 7:14), and, therefore, the law coincides absolutely in all of its commandments of moral uprightness with the Spirit of God. Thus, to walk in the Spirit is to fulfill the will of God. Who walk not after the flesh … This is an appropriate place to note Paul’s use of the term “flesh.” For three separate senses in which Paul employs this term, see under Romans 7:6. Paul did not teach that all flesh is by nature and from birth sinful. As Whiteside observed: Human flesh is not sinful in and of itself; if so, the flesh of Jesus was sinful. … Christ had in his nature all that the word “man” implies. “Since then the children are sharers in flesh and blood, he also in like manner partook of the same” (Hebrews 2:14). “Wherefore it behooved him in all things to be made like unto his brethren” (Hebrews 2:17). If Christ’s brethren were born sinful and he was not, then he was not like them in all things. But as Jesus was made in all things like unto his brethren and was without sin, it shows conclusively that sin is not a part of man’s nature. When Adam and Eve were created, they had all that belongs to human nature. Sin came into their lives as the result of a foreign element.
Sin is no more a park of man’s nature than is dust in the eye.[9]The use of the word “likeness” in the preceding verse (which see) has led some to suppose that Christ partook of a human nature that was only similar to that of people, the dissimilarity being in that all other people possessed a sinful nature, and Christ did not. Such cannot be true because the author of Hebrews described Christ as one “tempted in all points like as we are, and yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15). Now if Christ’s very nature had been different from that of other people, it could not have been true that he was tempted as people are tempted. He would have had, in such a view, a variation that would have made that statement in Hebrews impossible. Therefore, as already noted, the sole reason for Paul’s employment of the term “likeness” in the preceding verse was for the purpose of avoiding an implication that Christ’s flesh was sinful, and not for the purpose of suggesting that his flesh was different from that of all people. In the flesh … as used here has reference to living in such a manner that the fleshly lusts, appetites and desires are the goals of life. That person who makes the satisfaction of temporal, bodily, social and animal instincts the end and all of living is walking after flesh. Thus Tertullian was correct: It is the works of the flesh, not the substance of the flesh, which St. Paul condemns. … The apostle everywhere condemns the works of the flesh in such a way as to appear to condemn the flesh; but no one can suppose him to have any such view.[10][9] Robertson L. Whiteside, A New Commentary on the Epistle of Paul to Saints in Rome (Denton, Texas: Miss Inys Whiteside, 1945), p. 170. [10] Tertullian, The Ante-Nicene Fathers (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1957), Vol. III, 578-579. Verse 5 For they that are after the flesh mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.The Greek from which this verse comes, according to Wuest, may be translated literally thus: For those who are habitually dominated by the flesh put their mind on the things of the flesh.[11]Wuest also noted that the word “mind” carries with it the thought of “deliberately setting the mind upon a certain thing.” From this, it is clear that “walking after the flesh” means deliberately shutting out from the mind all other considerations except those related to animal, bodily, social and temporal needs and desires. In such a definition appears the true reason why the flesh is called “sinful.” It is not because of inherent or natural contamination, but it is due to domination of the flesh by a mind at enmity with God. Again, from Tertullian, Therefore the apostle says that “sin dwelleth in the flesh,” because the soul by which sin is provoked has its temporary lodging in the flesh, which is doomed indeed to death, not however, on its own account, but on account of sin.[12]Once the stubborn soul of man, the inner man himself, as distinguished from the flesh, has become reconciled to God through faith and obedience to the gospel of Christ, and has received the Holy Spirit of promise, such a person is then endowed with a whole new set of values. He is born again! Thus the man walks “in newness of life,” as Paul had already stated in Romans 6:4. This transformation from the old state to the new one is here identified as “minding the things of the Spirit”; but Paul also identified the same condition as that of permitting the mind of Christ to be in the believer (Philippians 2:5 f). A legitimate deduction from this is that to possess a measure of God’s Spirit and to possess the mind of Jesus Christ are one and the same thing. [11] Kenneth S. Wuest, Romans in the Greek New Testament (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1955), p. 130. [12] Tertullian, loc. cit. Verse 6 For the mind of the flesh is death; but the mind of the Spirit is life and peace.Mind of the flesh … cannot be thought of as identifying the mind with the flesh, that is, the substance of the flesh. Tertullian cautioned that The carnal mind must be referred to the soul (as distinguished from the flesh), although ascribed sometimes to the flesh (as here), on the ground that it is ministered to by the flesh and through the flesh.[13]The “mind” that Paul had in view here is the rebellious and perverse spirit of man’s inner self; and the meaning is not primarily that physical death is caused by such mind (though, of course, it can cause that also), but that a state of death derives from and automatically accompanies such a mind, a condition called death “in trespasses and sins” (Ephesians 2:1). In a simplistic view, man’s entire trouble lies in his inmost mind. Who is in charge there? If the inner throne is occupied by Satan, sin and death reign. If Christ is on the throne, life and peace reign. ENDNOTE: [13] Ibid., p. 579. Verse 7 Because the mind of the flesh is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can it be.As Barrett noted, (The mind of the flesh) means a mind from which God is excluded.[14]This verse should be understood in the light of certain basic facts. There is a seat of authority within every person; it is the essential “I” whose choices and decisions determine destiny. Not merely the body, but also the intelligence itself, are both subject to this essence of the person, which is the monitor of the complete life of the individual. This inner throne of personal authority was designed by the Creator for his own occupancy, and is so created that the “I” itself cannot occupy it; although it is possible for the “I” to dethrone God and turn the occupancy of the throne over to Satan. This is what Adam did in Eden. This means that every life is under the authority of God or that of Satan.
Man was so created that it is impossible for man himself to be the captain of his soul, his very nature requiring that the ultimate authority of his life shall belong to either one of two masters, and only two, God or Satan. Thus, when Paul spoke of the “mind of the flesh” in this verse as being at enmity with God, he referred to the mind of one who has put the Lord off the inner throne of his life. It is true that Satan deceives people into the vanity of believing that they might indeed get rid of God and “live their own lives”; but it is a delusion, for, in the very act of refusing God the adoration that is rightfully his, the person becomes automatically a de facto servant of the devil; and the inevitable result of such an exchange of masters is that the very highest human faculties (as well as all others), including the intelligence itself, are incapable of serving God as long as such a condition exists. This intelligence subordinated to Satan instead of God was called “the mind of the flesh” by Paul here, because such a mind no longer has any regard or concern for eternal things and is occupied completely with the earthly life of flesh. How utterly wrong, therefore, and how totally incredible, is the delusion that any such thing as total hereditary depravity was taught by Paul in this verse. Murray has this: In the whole passage we have the biblical basis for the doctrines of total depravity and total inability. … “Enmity against God” is nothing other than total depravity, and “cannot please God” nothing less than total inability.[15]But, of course, the expressions cited by Murray refer to man’s mind, not as it was by the endowment of birth, but as it became through his rebellion against God. Paul’s teaching here corresponds exactly with that of Jesus regarding two masters (Matthew 6:24). If one decides to serve one, he cannot serve the other; but in the teaching both of Paul and of Jesus, the question of the soul’s right to decide is never for an instant doubted. The impossibility of serving the other master cannot derive from any inborn condition, but it must always be viewed as the consequence of the soul’s decision to serve one or the other, that option being the only one that God has given people. The right of decision is never removed from man, no matter what his sins are; and therefore the “mind of the flesh” is morally accountable to God. Every gospel invitation, and even the great invitation of Jesus (Matthew 11:29-30) are grounded in the principle that even the wickedest of people have the right of decision if they elect to exercise it. The doctrines of depravity and inability cited above are inimical to the word of God, being not founded in the teachings of Christ or his apostles, but derived from the speculations of people. The question of judicial hardening is another matter, and will be discussed under Romans 11:25. Christ’s teaching with regard to little children and his word that “unto such belongeth the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 19:14) is a denial of human theories of total depravity, etc. [14] C. K. Barrett, op. cit., p. 158. [15] John Murray, op. cit., p. 287. Verse 8 And they that are in the flesh cannot please God.The questions raised by this verse are discussed under Romans 8:7, above. “In the flesh” is here a reference to the condition that exists when the soul rejects its Creator, sacrifices all hopes of immortality and of the eternal world, and decides to make the present life of flesh its one and only concern. Verse 9 But ye are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you. But if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.This verse categorically defines the person who is “in the flesh.” He is the man, any man, who does not have the Spirit of Christ. The great human delusion is to the effect that there are really three kingdoms, Gods, Satan’s, and OURS! But OURS apart from God is not ours at all, but Satan’s. It’s really that simple! Man, by the very nature of his creation, is free only to the extent of being able to choose between good and evil, between God and Satan.
There are not ten thousand ways, but only two. Jesus called them the narrow way and the broad way (Matthew 7:13-14). But that glorious right of decision makes all the difference. It is the most priceless endowment of life on earth. Man was created in God’s image; and, although sin has eroded and defaced the sacred likeness, enough divinity remains in every man, regardless of how wicked he is, to enable him to exercise the option of whom he wills to serve. Not even Satan can demur or countermand the soul’s high order to re-enthrone the Christ within! To every man there openeth A high Way and a low; And every man decideth The way his soul shall go.[16]The ability to establish an acceptable pattern of behavior in the sight of God is therefore dependent, first of all, upon a person’s decision. Once the right decision has been made by hearing and obeying the gospel invitation of Christ, God sends his Holy Spirit into the lives of his children, thereby enabling them to live “in the Spirit.” Such a new manner of life frees them from “the mind of the flesh” and embarks them and sustains them upon the right pathway. The importance of God’s Spirit in the hearts of Christians is of the very first magnitude, and a more particular attention to what the word of the Lord reveals concerning this truth is appropriate. THE SPIRITNot merely here (Romans 8:9), but throughout the New Testament, the fact of the indwelling Spirit of God is emphasized. The first promise of the gospel is that believers in Christ who repent and are baptized for the remission of sins shall “receive the gift of the Holy Spirit” (Acts 2:38 f), and for this reason he is called “The Holy Spirit of Promise” (Ephesians 1:13). To the Corinthians, Paul spoke of “the Holy Spirit which is in you” and declared that “the Spirit of God dwelleth in you” (1 Corinthians 6:19 1 Corinthians 3:16), To the Galatians, likewise, he said, “God sent forth the Spirit of his Son into our hearts” (Galatians 4:6); and the Saviour himself said of the Holy Spirit to his disciples that “he dwelleth with you, and he shall be in you” (John 14:17). The degree of impartation of this glorious gift is only a portion but marvelously sufficient. Paul called this partial infusion of the Holy Spirit “the earnest of our inheritance” (Ephesians 1:13-14) The token quantity of this gift is ample to supply the child of God with all the help that he needs, but it is not enough to make him independent, either of the community of believers or of the word of God. The limited nature of this impartation should ever be remembered. The Holy Spirit within Christians is not a full measure of prophetic, healing, and discerning power, such as that enjoyed by the apostles of Christ. No true Christian, by virtue of his possessing the Spirit, should ever consider himself free to discard the sacred scriptures and “feel” his way to glory; and yet one gets the impression that some feel that way about it. When does one receive the indwelling Spirit? The Scriptures are very plain with reference to this: (1) It occurs “after that ye heard the word of truth” (Ephesians 1:13); (2) It comes after people have believed in Christ (Ephesians 1:13); (3) the indwelling begins after believers have become sons of God and as a consequence of their being so (Galatians 4:6); and (4) the blessed Spirit is promised as a gift contingent upon and following the believer’s repentance and baptism (Acts 2:38 f). In the light of these sacred teachings, how true are the words of Brunner with reference to how the life of the Spirit is achieved. He said, “It is nothing less than being in Christ."[17] It may be accepted as absolutely certain therefore, that the Holy Spirit never enters a believer for the purpose of making him a son of God, and he, in fact, never enters any person whomsoever except those who decide to serve God and obey the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ. The results of the indwelling of the Spirit in the hearts of God’s children are also spelled out in Galatians 5:22-23, where such results are defined as love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, and self-control. Specifically it should be observed that certain things are not said to be the fruit of the Spirit. Such things as miracles, gifts of prophecy, and speaking in tongues are not included. The Holy Spirit is not a spirit of contradicting the scriptures, nor of noise and confusion, nor of dreams and illusions, nor of strife and sectarianism, nor of pride and envy, nor of unfaithfulness and division. There are many misconceptions regarding the Holy Spirit in Christians’ lives, perhaps more than with regard to any other major doctrine of the Bible. Some of these are: (1) that the baptism of the Holy Spirit is a commandment of God; on the other hand, it is not a commandment at all but a promise; (2) that the Holy Spirit is promised to all believers; on the contrary, he is promised to all believers who repent and are baptized for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38 f); (3) that the Holy Spirit baptism was promised to all Christians; but this promise was to the apostles alone (Luke 24:49 :); (4) that the Holy Spirit is imparted to make people sinless; yet Peter sinned after he had received even the baptism of the Holy Spirit; (5) that the baptism of the Holy Spirit is a subjective experience within men’s hearts; to the contrary, it was a visible and outward manifestation of God’s power, as exemplified by the two New Testament examples of it at Pentecost and at the house of Cornelius; (6) that the baptism of the Holy Spirit is followed by speaking in tongues; and, while it is true that the apostles did speak in tongues on Pentecost, after the power of the Spirit came upon them, the kind of tongues manifested there was nothing like the incoherent, unintelligible jabberings of the so-called “tongues” affected today; (7) that the Holy Spirit must work directly upon an unbeliever before he can obey God; but this is wrong if any other type of work is expected beyond the preaching of God’s word, there being absolutely no New Testament example of any conversion in which the convert did not first hear the word of God preached and then upon believing it, obey it. [16] John Oxenham, The Ways. [17] Emil Brunner, op. cit., p. 68. Verse 10 And if Christ is in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the spirit is life because of righteousness.If Christ is in you … is exactly synonymous with several other Pauline expressions, such as: being “in Christ,” the Spirit “dwelling in” Christians, and “having the mind of Christ” (Philippians 2:5), etc. These expressions may not be precisely differentiated, for they all refer to the saved condition. The body is dead because of sin … emphasizes the truth that the redemption in Christ does not remit the sentence of physical death upon all men. The body of the holiest Christian is dead (that is, under sentence of death), even as it is with all. Godet has this: The primeval sentence still holds sway THERE; the body is deathful still; it is the body of the Fall; but the Spirit is life. He is in that body, your secret power and peace eternal. “Because of righteousness” (means) because of the merit of your Lord, in which you are accepted, and which has won for you this wonderful Spirit life.[18]Some commentators insist that “spirit” in the second clause of this verse means the spirit of man, this being required as the antithesis of “body” in the first clause. Others, like Godet, interpret it as meaning the Holy Spirit. Godet wrote: We refer the word (Spirit) here, as throughout the passage, to the Holy Spirit. No other interpretation seems either consistent with the whole context, or adequate to its grandeur.[19]Another view is possible, and is broad enough to include both viewpoints. By understanding “spirit” to mean not merely the spirit of an unregenerated man, but the spirit of the Christian in the state of being indwelt by the Holy Spirit, the antithesis would be fulfilled and the appropriate emphasis upon the Holy Spirit would both be achieved by such an interpretation. This also harmonizes with the text. for it is not of any human spirit that Paul here wrote, but the spirit of Christians; and, furthermore, the life imparted is due absolutely to the Holy Spirit’s residence within the Christian’s spirit. [18] F. Godet, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1970), p. 214. [19] Ibid. Verse 11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwelleth in you, he that raised up Christ Jesus from the dead shall give life also to your mortal bodies through his Spirit that dwelleth in you.In the preceding verse, Paul mentioned the body’s being sentenced to death, due to that portion of the primeval sentence being still operative, even upon Christians; but even the death of the body is at last to be nullified by the salvation that is in Christ Jesus. Such a nullification will take place when the “dead in Christ” rise to meet the Lord in the air. The resurrection itself, in this verse, is made to depend upon the indwelling of the Spirit, for it is promised, “If the Spirit … dwelleth in you.” The resurrection of Christ appears here as a pledge of a similar resurrection of Christians, a resurrection of their “mortal bodies,” just as Christ’s mortal body was raised and recognized by his disciples. Thus salvation is more than merely saving the soul, although that is likewise glorious; but this teaches that body and soul alike will participate in the ultimate glory of eternal life. The great connective between the resurrection of Christ and the ultimate resurrection of his disciples is the blessed ministry of the Holy Spirit in Christian hearts, and thus appears the absolute necessity of the Spirit’s residence in Christian hearts. This place, along with Romans 8:9 compels the conclusion that if one does not have the Spirit of God in his soul, he is not a Christian, not in Christ, not saved, and is not in any sense Christ’s. Verse 12 So then, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh: for if ye live after the flesh, we must die; but if by the Spirit ye put to death the deeds of the body, ye shall live. For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God.The first clause here is a figure of speech called meiosis, a vast understatement for the sake of emphasis. “Not debtors to the flesh”! Indeed no; they are debtors to the Spirit and are charged with the responsibility of even putting the flesh to death, in a figure. These verses form an exhortation regarding the two ways to live, the consequences of which Paul had already fully outlined. To live after the flesh is death; to live after the Spirit is eternal life. Ye must die … has reference to more than physical death, for Paul had already noted in Romans 8:10 that Christians are not exempt from that; therefore, it is of eternal consequences that he spoke here. Lenski was impressed with the contrast between the words “live” and “die.” Men ever think that they are really living when they give way to the flesh, whereas in reality they are heading straight for eternal death.[20]Significantly, there is no relaxation of moral requirements for those who are in Christ. Believing and obeying the gospel, receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit, and thereby rejoicing in the grace of God, do not for a moment cause sin to be any less sin for the Christian. Mortification of the. deeds of the body is the daily task of the soul in Christ. Greathouse’s comment is this: It is important that we try to grasp just what Paul means here. He is most certainly not advocating ascetic mortification, which is based upon the idea that the body is a weight upon the soul. Paul is not positing any Hellenistic body-soul dualism. As we have seen, the body [Greek: soma] is the soul expressed concretely. What the believer is obligated to do, if we may borrow Oswald Chambers’ happy expression, is to sacrifice the natural for the sake of the spiritual. By the Spirit, we are to reckon that the members of our body are dead to sin and that we are alive unto God (Romans 6:11-13)[21][20] R. C. H. Lenski, The Interpretation of St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Augsburg Publishing House, 1963), p. 517. [21] William M. Greathouse, Beacon Bible Commentary (Kansas City, Missouri: Beacon Hill Press, 1968), p. 174. Verse 15 For ye received not the spirit of bondage again unto fear; but ye received the spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.The spirit of adoption … is doubtless another expression referring to the Holy Spirit, so-called here because of the appropriate contrast with the “spirit of bondage” which marked their lives in the service of Satan. Christians are sometimes called “bondslaves” to Christ; but here their status is compared to that of children adopted by a loving father. The point of the admonition forbids fear. If God’s children will love him and be faithful to him, there is absolutely nothing that they need to fear. The first fruits of the indwelling Spirit are love, joy, and peace; and it is unbecoming of a child of God to manifest a spirit of bondage and fear. After all, he is God’s CHILD! As a child of God, the Christian should live a life of joyful anticipation of those eternal benefits which are so emphatically promised in the word of God. Abba, Father … “Abba” is the Aramaic equivalent of “Father”; and thus the expression literally means “Father, Father.” Sanday explained the repetition as one of endearment and entreaty, taken from the natural impulse of children to repeat a beloved name in different forms.[22]Barrett was impressed with the profound implications of this verse, as follows: That it occurs twice (the expression “Abba, Father”) in Paul’s Greek writings is a striking fact, which may be due to the impression made by Jesus’ direct and unconventional approach to the Father. It corresponds exactly to the opening of the Lord’s Prayer in the Lucan form (Luke 11:2), and Paul’s reference here may be to the use of this prayer in Christian worship. The very fact that you can address God as Abba proves that the Spirit is at work among you, and that you are Gods’ children.[23]Taking Barrett’s discerning thought a little further, the PROOF that God’s Spirit is actually working in people does not depend upon some outlandish manifestation but upon simple things like the willingness to address God as Father in prayer, the willingness to sing his praises in public assemblies, the willingness to attend public worship and to maintain public identification with God’s children in the church. It is dearly in such ways as these, and in countless so-called ordinary ways, that the proof of the indwelling Spirit is manifested in Christians. Such prosaic things as daily prayer and regular worship tend to be despised; but in this verse the Spirit himself reveals that these things are actually the sine qua non of walking in the Spirit, and that they prove the Spirit’s indwelling presence, only with this provision, that such conduct is truly the result of the Spirit’s influence and not merely the exercise of the person’s own will through selfish and social considerations. [22] W. Sanday, Ellicott’s Commentary on the Holy Bible (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1959), p. 236. [23] C. K. Barrett, op. cit., p. 164. Verse 16 The Spirit himself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are children of God: and if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified with him.If so be that we suffer with him … Here again the great provisional is hurled into the consideration of the Christian’s inheritance. “If’” the child of God is faithful, even to the point of suffering with Christ, then, but not otherwise, shall he truly inherit eternal life. Again from Brunner: We are still only adopted; we have not yet taken over the inheritance. We have been appointed heirs apparent of eternal life and its fulfillment, but we do not yet enjoy it. We have the full assurance of future glory, but we are not yet out of the life where there is suffering and fighting. Indeed, a definite suffering actually belongs to true discipleship. Whoever does not take up his cross and follow him, cannot be his disciple (Matthew 16:24 f). He who does not want to suffer with Christ cannot share in his glory either.
The way of the Christian is not a path on the heights but down below. The way on the heights is in heaven, not on earth.[24]Notice the contrast between the use of “sons of God” (Romans 8:14) and “children of God” here. The latter terminology emphasizes the dependence of the redeemed upon their Saviour. They are not full grown, but are children; they cannot make it “on their own.” Moreover, they are adopted, not heirs in their own right; and further, it is not as heirs SOLE, but as joint-heirs with Christ that they shall inherit, their ultimate inheritance being conditioned absolutely upon their identification with Christ, as being “in him” now and “found in him” at the last day. “The witness of the Spirit brought into view in these verses has occasioned some extravagant language by commentators. Thus, John Wesley said: (The witness of the Holy Spirit) is an inward impression on my soul, whereby the Spirit of God directly witnesses to my spirit, that I am a child of God; that Jesus Christ hath loved me, and given himself for me; and that all my sins are blotted out, and I, even I, am reconciled to God.[25]A further study of what the word of the Lord teaches on this subject is warranted. THE WITNESS OF THE HOLY SPIRITNothing associated with the Christian faith has been the occasion of more uncertainty, confusion, and misinformation, than has the function of the Holy Spirit as a witness. None can deny that the Holy Spirit does indeed witness with believers, for this is the plain affirmation of the verse before us. It is not of the fact, but of the manner of the witness, that we are concerned here. John Wesley (as cited above) and countless others have understood the witnessing as an inner and subjective experience; and in that view of what this verse means, all kinds of subjective impressions, experiences, and even dreams have been received as valid bona fide witnessing of the Holy Spirit. This writer still recalls an incident of many years ago, in which a man struck himself in the breast and said, “I would not give what I feel right here for all the Bibles on earth.” He interpreted that “feeling” as the direct testimony of the Holy Spirit to him that he was a redeemed child of God, despite the fact that he was a known sinner in that community, who had never confessed the Lord, had never been baptized, and did not honor a church of any name with his membership! It is possible that such notions of the Spirit’s witness still exist; and, in the interest of providing true and accurate information on this subject, the following is presented. The New Testament gives certain examples of the Holy Spirit’s witnessing, and those inspired examples demand our attention. The author of Hebrews wrote: And the Holy Spirit beareth witness to us; for after he hath said, This is the covenant that I shall make with them … then saith he, Their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more (Hebrews 10:15-17). Here is an authentic case of the Holy Spirit’s witnessing to the author of the book of Hebrews. Let it be noted that the Spirit did not witness “in” him but “to” him, and that the content of that witness had nothing whatever to do with any inward “feelings” of the author. The witness did not consist of anything that he either felt or thought but was composed of what the Holy Spirit SAID. He said, “This is the covenant, etc.” (Jeremiah 31:33 f); and the prophet Jeremiah was the mortal author of the passage here said to be the witness of the Holy Spirit. This, of course, had been written in the sacred scriptures many centuries before the author of Hebrews wrote his epistle; and that author learned what that witness was, either by reading it himself, or through hearing others read it. As Griffith Thomas noted, This is the true witness of the Holy Spirit, not something dependent upon our own variable emotions, but that which is objective to us, and fixed, the word of God.[26]Take another example. Paul wrote: The Holy Spirit testifieth to me in every city, saying that bonds and afflictions await me (Acts 20:23). Here again the witness of the Holy Spirit consisted of a message in words spoken. Paul did not (in that passage) name the speakers through whom the message was delivered in each of the cities where such witnessing occurred; but a graphic revelation of how it was done in one city was recorded for our benefit by the Holy Spirit, through the author of Acts of Apostles. This occurred at Caesarea, thus: And as we tarried there some days, there came down from Judea a certain prophet, named Agabus. And coming to us and taking Paul’s girdle, he bound his own feet and hands, and said, Thus saith the Holy Spirit. So shall the Jews at Jerusalem bind the man that owneth this girdle, and shall deliver him into the hands of the Gentiles (Acts 21:10-11). Here again, the Holy Spirit did not witness “in” Paul but “to” him, and not by any such things as subjective feelings, dreams, impressions, or premonitions. The Holy Spirit’s witness came to him through words intelligibly spoken, dramatically illustrated, and plainly identified as being, not the words of Agabus, but the words of the Holy Spirit. That is the only kind of witness of the Holy Spirit that is worth the attention of the child of God. These two New Testament examples of the Spirit’s witnessing to people justify the conclusion that such witness is accomplished in two ways: (1) through the words of a living prophet, known to be true and authentic, and (2) through the words of the Bible, authored by the true and authentic prophets and inspired people of previous ages. In view of this, how does the Holy Spirit bear witness with our spirit that we are the children of God, the same being the affirmation of the verses before us? The Holy Spirit is the author of the commandments in the Bible, and of the promise of salvation connected with and related to those commandments, as for example when the Holy Spirit said, “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved.” The witness of the Holy Spirit, in one particular, is that verse in the New Testament (Mark 16:16). Now, when the spirit of a man has accepted heaven’s offer by believing and obeying such a command, then the spirit of such a person is also a witness that he has believed and obeyed God, and is therefore saved. Thus it comes about that the Holy Spirit bears witness, not “to” our spirit, merely, but “with our spirit” that we are children of God. Regarding such marvelous truths to the effect that God loves us, Christ loves us, he gave himself for me, he has forgiven my sins, etc. - such are indeed witnessings borne unto the sons of people by the Holy Spirit, but certainly not in such a subjective fashion as that fancied by Wesley. No. Witnessings such as these do not depend upon the fallible and variable emotions and feelings of mortals but are grounded solidly in the word that liveth and abideth forever. One cannot resist the conclusion that Wesley received the things he mentioned, at least some of them, from the New Testament, and not from any independent testimony within himself. At least, that is WHERE this writer receives testimony from the Holy Spirit! Thus, it is plain that the convert may properly say that the Holy Spirit bears witness to him in the New Testament, as indeed he does to all people, inviting people to accept salvation and revealing the conditions upon which they may have it; but the Spirit never bears witness “with” such a person until he accepts and obeys the gospel. Upon that event, the Spirit then bears witness “with” his spirit that he is a child of God. The Spirit witnesses as to the terms of salvation; the saved person’s spirit witnesses to the fact that he has complied with the terms; and, in that instance, there are two witnesses to the man’s salvation. The witness of the Holy Spirit is available to all people who are able either to hear or read the word of the Lord. If one wishes to know what the witness of the Holy Spirit is with reference to such a question as who is, or is not, a child of God, let him read there what is written. There is the true witness of the Holy Spirit. Paul’s subject in these verses (Romans 8:14-16) was not how to become a Christian, but how to remain so. It is a misuse of this passage for one to declare that “Since I feel that I am led by God’s Spirit, I know I am a Christian.” Before the blessed Spirit will enter and dwell in any heart, its possessor must already be a Christian. No man who is not “in Jesus Christ” can possibly be host to God’s Spirit. It is “because ye are sons” that God sent his Spirit into people’s hearts (Galatians 4:6). [24] Emil Brunner, op. cit., p. 73. [25] John Wesley, Sermons, Vol. I, pp. 115-116. [26] Griffith Thomas, St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1970), p. 128. Verse 18 For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed to us-ward.Despite the fact that Christians are beneficiaries of the blood of Christ, heirs of everlasting glory, and destined at last to live in that upper and better kingdom where all the problems of earth shall be solved in the light and bliss of heaven, there is a present and urgent sorrow that falls upon all of them by reason of the sufferings in the flesh. Paul had revealed a moment before that the child of God might expect no exemptions but must suffer throughout the days of mortality; and therefore, by way of encouragement, he emphasizes as a motive for patience in such sufferings, their triviality, as compared with the ultimate glory of the children of God, a glory which they shall not merely see, but a glory in which they shall actually participate. The time of such a glorification of the redeemed will be at the second coming of Christ and following the judgment of the final day. That far-off reality is here made a motive of patient endurance of sufferings and tribulations. Greathouse thus expressed it: Sufferings then belong to this present age, between the advents of our Lord. Glory belongs to the age to come. As Moffatt puts it, sufferings are a mere nothing when set against the glory that shall be revealed in us."[27]Charles Hodge connected this verse with the remainder of the chapter thus: The main idea of Rom 8:18, obviously, is that the future glory transcends immeasurably the sufferings of this present state. All that follows tends to illustrate and enforce that idea.[28][27] William M. Greathouse, op. cit., p. 179. [28] Charles Hodge, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1968), p. 269. Verse 19 For the earnest expectation of the creation waiteth for the reveling of the sons of God.The common interpretation of this verse, from which this writer differs, is represented by the following: The creation (means) the whole world of nature, animate and inanimate.[29]Paul, after the manner of other sacred writers, describes the external world (the sub-human world, animate and inanimate) as sympathizing with the righteous, and participating in the glories of Messiah’s reign.[30]Hodge refers to such an interpretation as “the common one,” and Murray said that: This view is the one most widely maintained by the commentators.[31]Very extensive and learned dissertations are available to “prove” this viewpoint, the best of them, perhaps, being that of Hodge whose logic is persuasive and difficult of refutation; but Hodge himself admitted that In the early Christian church, this opinion was prevalent, and was the germ whence the extravagance of the Millenarians arose.[32]Before proceeding to what is here considered the correct interpretation of this verse, it should be pointed out that if the above view is taken poetically, or figuratively, to represent the “whole creation” now groaning beneath the consequences of the fall and anxiously awaiting the long expected day of redemption, then there would be no violence to the truth in such a view. But the word “creation” in this verse is exactly the word in Mark 16:15 and in Colossians 1:23, where, in both places, it means “human beings” only, and not animals and inanimate portions of the sub-creation; nor does there appear to be any good reason why the same restricted meaning should not be understood here. The following is from a footnote in the Greek Diaglott: [@Ktisis] (as used in Romans 8:19-22), , has the same signification here as in Mark 16:15 : “Proclaim the glad tidings to the whole creation,” that is, “all mankind;” and also Colossians 1:23, where a similar phrase occurs. That the brute and inanimate creation is not here spoken of, but mankind, is evident from the hope of emancipation from the “slavery of corruption” held out in the 21st verse, and the contrast introduced in the 23verse, between the [@ktisis] and those possessing the “first fruit of the Spirit."[33]Despite the preponderance of the commentators alleged to support the other view, there are, nevertheless, many of the most distinguished expositors who hold the view advocated here. Hodge himself mentioned, as holding this persuasion, Hammond, Locke, Semler, Ammon, and others, who held that the word , as used here, means the race of mankind as distinguished from Christians.[34]Note the following: in the language of St. Paul and of the New Testament, signifies “mankind”; especially the Gentile world, as the far greater part of creation.[35]One cannot fail to recognize that this concept of mostly denotes “humanity” for Paul, and that he nowhere else speaks of the world of nature.[36]James Macknight summed up the position which seems to be correct, as follows: According to some commentators, the words “we know that every creature groaneth” denote the whole creatures of God, animate and inanimate, which, as they were cursed for the sin of the first man, may by a beautiful rhetorical figure be represented as groaning together under that curse, and earnestly wishing to be delivered from it. … Nevertheless Romans 8:21, where it is said that “the creature itself shall be liberated from the bondage of corruption into the freedom of the glory of the children of God”; and the antithesis, Romans 8:23, “not only they, but ourselves also,” show that the apostle is speaking, not of the brute and animate creation, but of mankind, and of their earnest desire of immortality. For these reasons, and especially because of Mar 16:15, “Preach the gospel to every creature,” which means to every human creature, I think the words (creature and creation) in this verse and in the preceding three verses (this note was written on Romans 8:22), signify mankind in general, Jews as well as Gentiles. See also Colossians 1:23 where the words signify “every human creature."[37]If them, as assumed here, this verse is a reference to the unredeemed portion of humanity, which constitutes the overwhelming majority of all men, what is the meaning to be understood by the statement here that there is “an expectation” or longing and eager anticipation looking to the revelation of the sons of God? The most likely meaning is resident in that passionate desire of the human race for eternal life. Hodge downgraded such universal longings after immortality as insufficient to justify Paul’s words here; but it cannot be denied that there are deep and irrepressible longings in the human heart for something better than the poor years of agony and frustration on earth.
How eagerly do the men of science seek to hurl back the frontiers of death; how persistently do they strive to extend the human life-span; and how pitiful is the reaction of every man to the inevitable claims of the tomb! That all such agony of frustration is indeed an “expectation” looking to the revelation of the sons of God appears reasonable enough, the greatest tragedy being that, for earth’s unredeemed billions, that expectation is but a subconscious thing, leading them to seek its fruition, not in the Lord Jesus Christ, through whom their most daring hopes might become reality, but in the futile and ineffectual devices which they themselves have contrived. Such is the darkness of the epic tragedy of mankind, lost in sin, without God, and without hope in the world, until they shall turn to the Lord Jesus Christ. Macknight’s fortunate paraphrase of this verse is thus: What a blessing a resurrection to immortality is, may be understood by this, that the earnest desire of mankind hath ever been to obtain that glorious endless life in the body, by which the sons of God shall be made known.[38][29] W. Sanday, op. cit., p. 236. [30] Charles Hodge, op. cit., p. 273. [31] John Murray, op. cit., p. 302. [32] Charles Hodge, op. cit., p. 272. [33] The Emphatic Greek Diaglott, p. 531. [34] Charles Hodge, op. cit., p. 270. [35] John Locke, Paraphrase and Notes on the Epistles of St. Paul (Boston, Mass., 1832), p. 331. [36] Emil Brunner, op. cit., p. 75. [37] James Macknight, Apostolical Epistles (Nashville: The Gospel Advocate Company, 1960), p. 98. [38] Ibid. Verse 20 For the creation was subjected to vanity, not of its own will, but by reason of him who subjected it, in hope.There are three statements in this verse: (1) the creation was subjected to vanity; (2) this subjection was not voluntary, but imposed by God; and (3) the very subjection is a basis of hope, for otherwise there would have been no point at all in granting to rebellious humanity any further tolerance at all. Vanity … describes the wretchedness, sufferings, disappointments, frustrations, futilities and general tragedy of mortal life in a state of separation from God, due to man’s sin. The New English Bible translates this phrase, “was made subject to frustration.” Not of its own will … is understood by some commentators as meaning “not due to any act of its own”; but that interpretation confuses the reason of the subjection with the execution of the deserved punishment of man’s rebellion. The reason for the subjection was certainly due to man’s willful and rebellious act; but the execution of God’s sentence upon man for that rebellion was no part of man’s will. but contrary to it. It was the will of “him who subjected it,” meaning God, humanity having had no choice whatever, except to submit to the subjection sentenced upon mankind by the Father. Thus the subjection was “not of its own will.” John Locke insisted that Adam’s disobedience was not of his own will, since it occurred “not through his own choice, but by the guile of the devil."[39] However, Locke’s interpretation fails to give proper weight to Adam’s responsibility. Tempted or not, it was Adam’s free will that consented to the deed that plunged all of his posterity into ruin. Him who subjected it in hope … is a reference to God, who alone had the authority and power to subject the creation to vanity, and also the option of totally destroying man because of sin, or subjecting him in hope of his redemption. The master plan of God called for the exercise of the latter option. Although many agree that God is spoken of here, Godet thought it was Adam who, through his rebellion, subjected the lower creation to the curse of God; and Hammond was quoted by him as applying the term “him” to Satan, the prince of the world, as Jesus calls him, who either by his own fall, or that of man, dragged the creation into the miserable state here described.[40]Neither of those views, however, takes into account the revelation here that the subjection was effected “in hope,” a motive far from Satan, and likewise a stranger to Adam. That there is, of course, a grain of truth in such views, stems from the fact that both Adam and Satan had a part in it, Satan as the provocateur, and Adam as the rebellious instrument. It is, however, fully in keeping with the teachings of the Bible that God is said to do many things which, in a lesser sense, were done by others, as, for example, in the case of the crucifixion of Christ (see under Romans 3:26). [39] John Locke, op. cit., p. 332. [40] F. Godet, op. cit., p. 315. Verse 21 That the creation itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the liberty of the glory of the children of God.The first clause here is the expression of God’s hope for fallen man and should be read in close connection with the preceding verse. Here is the proof of what creation Paul meant in these verses, the same being the creation which is in “the bondage of corruption,” terminology which excludes both the brute and inanimate creations and points dramatically at the sons of Adam. (See under Romans 8:19.) The corruption here ascribed to the “creation,” as well as God’s hope of its redemption, and of its becoming partakers of the liberty of the glory of the children of God are statements that simply cannot fit animal or inanimate life. No animal, for example, could be thought of as being in the bondage of corruption, nor as having any prospect of ever getting out of it. Again we have recourse to Macknight’s paraphrase: In the resolution that, on account of the obedience of the second man, even the heathens themselves shall be set free from the bondage of the grave, and those who believe be brought into full possession of the happiness which belongs to the children of God.[41]ENDNOTE: [41] James Macknight, op. cit., p. 98. Verse 22 For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.The whole creation … means all mankind, the word “creation” being the same as that used in all of these verses (see under Romans 8:19). Here the metaphor is that of the labor room in a hospital, only without modern anesthetics. Locke’s paraphrase is, For we know that all mankind, all of them, groan together, and unto this day are in pain, as a woman in labor, to be delivered out of the uneasiness of this mortal state.[42]As Brunner noted, human beings are not asked if they wish to suffer, they must do so: No one is asked! … This expectation of the creature is different from the hope of Christians. (In their case) it is an apathetic, unconscious waiting, a waiting for something better, yet uncertain of its goal. But it is expounded by the apostle according to its true nature. What men actually mean without knowing it, is the goal in Christ which has been given to mankind: divine sonship, freedom, divine adoption, participation in the glory of God.[43]No adequate description of the groaning of humanity is possible; but all men are aware of it. Millions of hospital beds are freighted with agony and despair. The struggles of humanity are like the frenzy of a savage beast caught in a vicious trap.
Tears stain every face, and blood lies upon every threshold. The problem of daily survival presses upon the hearts of millions who are snared in poverty, grounded in the mud and filth of human sin, facing a life of ceaseless want and toil, and, augmenting their wretchedness, is the soul-fever of aching desires which agitate their minds, stifling the nobler impulses, and condemning the unfortunate to the pursuit of goals which, even if attained, turn to dust and ashes in their hands. And to climax all that tragedy of agitation and failure, the very bodies of all people, after attaining some little strength for a day, wither and descend into the rottenness of the grave. Like a wounded serpent that sinks its poisonous fangs into its own flesh people vent the agony of their madness through vicious indulgence of wars and revolutions, only to face with each new generation the unremitting sentence to repeat the old follies, over and over again. The screams of the labor room are an apt metaphor indeed of the human condition, “subjected to vanity.” [42] John Locke, op. cit., p. 332. [43] Emil Brunner, op. cit., p. 75. Verse 23 And not only so, but ourselves also, who have the first-fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for our adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.But ourselves also … Alas, not even Christians are exempt from the tragic consequences of Adam’s transgression. Universal sighing is also our lot. As Brunner expressed it: Of course, we have already become sons or children of God; but the effect of the redemption and the full realization of the sonship are still outstanding. We have only the “first-fruits” of the Spirit, the pledge of life in the glory of God, but the glory itself in its fullness is not yet here.[44]Our adoption … which was mentioned so favorably in Romans 8:15 (which see), even that is by no means final but must be waited for. The adoption will be final and complete when man possesses his body, free of the sentence of death, thus being empowered truly to participate in the glory of God. The incompleteness of man’s salvation shall ever pertain to the earthly phase of the Christian’s existence. The adoption is not final, and even his possession of the Spirit of God is partial, in the extent of an “earnest” only, and bearing not the full fruit, but only the “firstfruits.” Despite the partial and incomplete nature of the salvation Christians enjoy during the present life, it is nevertheless the end and all of living. The word of the Creator himself is signed to the title deeds of our hope. The blood of Christ is sufficient to redeem; the love of God for his children will finally prevail; and the ancient promise of God will be fulfilled when “the ransomed of the Lord” shall indeed enter into his presence “with songs of everlasting joy upon their heads, and sorrow and sighing shall flee away” (Isaiah 35:10). ENDNOTE: [44] Ibid. Verse 24 For in hope were we saved: but hope that is seen is not hope: for who hopeth for that which he seeth?Attention is directed to the English Revised Version (1885) margin where appears the alternate translation, “By hope were we saved.” Translators and commentators are sensitive about salvation’s being ascribed to anything else except faith; but the word of God honors no such inhibitions, affirming positively that people are saved “by grace” (Ephesians 2:8), “by the gospel” (1 Corinthians 15:1-2), “by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth” (Acts 4:10-12), “by his (Christ’s) life” (Romans 5:10), “by the washing of regeneration” (Titus 3:5), “by his (Christ’s) blood (Revelation 1:5), “by the foolishness of the preaching” (1 Corinthians 1:21), “by baptism” (1 Peter 3:21), “by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead” (1 Peter 1:3), etc. Any simplistic system whatever that would impose such a word as “only” upon any of the factors involved in human redemption is antagonistic to the scriptures. Hope belongs to the Christian’s status, and is a prerequisite of his salvation, no less than faith and love, all three, in fact, being mentioned as a trinity of Christian requirements in 1 Corinthians 13:13; and most significantly, faith does not climax that series; love does! Verse 25 But if we hope for that which we see not, then do we with patience wait for it.This verse explains how we are saved by hope, because, without hope, there could not be the patience which is required to prevent the child of God from falling into discouragement. The Christian’s salvation lies altogether within an area of what the world speaks of as “intangibles.” It is a faithful trusting in “things not seen as yet” (see my Commentary on Hebrews, p. 250). Hope is far more than a mere wish that something might exist or be possessed; it is a valid claim, supported by faith, and grounded in confidence that the Lord is able to keep “that which I have committed to him” against that day (1 Timothy 1:12). This hope which saves is grounded in the Christian’s living faith, but it must also be distinguished from faith. As Sanday noted, Nor can it rightly be said that hope is an aspect of faith, because faith and hope are expressly distinguished, and placed as coordinates with each other in 1 Corinthians 13:13, “And now abideth faith, hope, and love, these three; and the greatest of these is love."[45]Going a little further with Sanday’s reasoning, “these three” are arranged in the ascending order of greatness, and therefore hope outranks faith in the constitution of God’s redemptive system. The KJV’s rendition of “We are saved by hope” is thus far better than the English Revised Version’s “for in hope were we saved.” One may not resist the fear that the latter translation was encouraged by the jealousy of people to guard one of their popular theories that people are saved by “faith alone.” ENDNOTE: [45] W. Sanday, op. cit., p. 237. Verse 26 And in like manner the Spirit also helpeth our infirmity: for we know not how to pray as we ought; but the Spirit himself maketh intercession for us with groanings that cannot be uttered.There are two intercessors for the Christian: (1) Christ at the right hand of the Majesty on High (Hebrews 7:25), and (2) the Holy Spirit within the Christian himself. Thus, there are two sources of encouragement open to the Christian: (1) the blessed hope within himself, and (2) the help of the Holy Spirit. This entire arrangement supplies both human and divine encouragement to the child of God. We know not how to pray as we ought … does not mean that Christians have no knowledge of prayer; but, as Lard noted: Our weakness and ignorance in this life are so great that in many respects, possibly as a rule, we know not what we should pray for as we ought. We want many things, and it may be pray for them, which, were they granted, would prove our greatest rots. fortune; while, we do not want, and never ask, for many things which would be our greatest blessings. Here then is ignorance of what we should pray for; and, as to how we should pray, I imagine we are equally at a loss. Confessedly then, we are weak and need aid.[46]With groanings that cannot be uttered … is a reference to the dimly perceived and partially understood longings of the redeemed soul which are impossible for the Christian to frame into articulated petitions to the Father, but which needs, though inadequately understood, are nevertheless understood by the Spirit of God who transfers such inexpressible yearnings of the soul to the Throne itself. This identification of the groanings mentioned here with the believer’s inadequacy, rather than with any insufficiency of the Holy Spirit, follows the thought of Locke’s paraphrase, thus: Such therefore, are our groans, which the Spirit, in aid to our infirmity, makes use of. For we know not what prayers to make, as we ought, but the Spirit itself layeth for us our requests before God.[47]Therefore, when the Christian’s prayers have reached the boundary of language as a vehicle for the conveyance of thought, when such prayers become more of a heavenward sigh than a formal utterance, then the Christian may know that the inward Intercessor is fully able to convey the soul’s true desire to the Throne. [46] Moses E. Lard, Commentary on Paul’s Letter to Romans (Cincinnati, Ohio: Christian Board of Publication, 1914), p. 277. [47] John Locke, op. cit., p. 333. Verse 27 And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is in the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God.The identification of the Holy Spirit in this verse indicates personality, from the consideration of his having a “mind,” and also unity with God from the consideration of his access to the Father and the absolute harmony of his actions with “the will of God.” Particularly, it should be noted that the Spirit’s intercession is not for all, but for the saints, the latter word emphasizing that the help of the Holy Spirit is available only for them that already have the Spirit within. God is represented here as searching people’s hearts; and, as Godet noted, “God is often called in the Old Testament the searcher of hearts."[48] People may not inquire exactly into the “how” of such things, nor as to the precise manner in which such marvelous activities on behalf of the redeemed soul are actually accomplished. That it was from the beginning, in God’s purpose, designed that the Holy Spirit would intercede for the saved, was pointed out thus by Locke: “The Spirit” promised in the time of the gospel, is called “the Spirit of supplications” inZechariah 12:10.[49][48] F. Godet, op. cit., p. 321. [49] John Locke, op. cit., p. 334. Verse 28 And we know that to them that love God all things work together for good, even to them that are called according to his purpose.All things … includes all sufferings, sorrows, infirmities, and everything else of a discouraging and calamitous nature which might befall God’s child on earth. “For good …” cannot mean earthly prosperity, success, bodily health, or any other purely mortal benefit, but is rather a reference to the eternal felicity of the soul. Whatever might happen to the Christian in this life, absolutely nothing can happen to HIM, that is, his saved inner self. This is true because God is able to overrule every earthly circumstance in such a manner as to compel its contribution to the eternal redemption that awaits the children of God. As Brunner warned, No universal optimism is meant - (such as) everything will turn out all right for everybody in any case. There stands here the significant limitation, “to them that love God."[50]Work together for good … speaks of a situation in which God is surely at work on the Christian’s behalf, but it also speaks’ of a situation in which the saved person’s reaction to life’s woes is a controlled response. Some ships sail east, and some sail west, By the selfsame winds that blow. It’s the set of the sails and not the gales That determines the way they go! -Anonymous The reaction of the child of God, or his response, to the ills of mortal life must be one of patience, submission, humility, prayer, love, hope, and faith. Even adversity of the severest kind must be made to yield its precious fruit in the heart of the Christian. It has been proved again and again by Christians that “Prosperity is the blessing of the Old Testament; adversity is the blessing of the New."[51]Them that love God … identifies the persons who shall receive the blessing of having all things work together for good on their behalf, this identification being further pinpointed by the last clause, “them that are called according to his purpose.” Who are the people who love God? Christ said: If ye love me, ye will keep my commandments. … He that hath my commandments and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me (John 14:15 John 14:21). Christ’s apostles stressed the same truth: This is the love of God, that we keep his commandments (1 John 5:3). This is love, that we should walk after his commandments (2 John 1:1:6). Them that are called according to his purpose … At this point, the great Biblical doctrines of calling, foreknowledge, and foreordination (or predestination) begin to emerge, doctrines which have evoked entire libraries of discussions, theories, and explanations, and which, in the fullness of their total meaning, may not be fully comprehensible to finite intelligence. These great teachings point toward God, upward and heavenward, and are like massive mountain peaks reaching up into the clouds, the summits of which extend far beyond the boundaries of human vision. Despite this, the foothills reached by our understanding afford beautiful and breathtaking vistas of these “deep things of the Spirit of God.” Moses E. Lard said that “Those who are called” is simply another mode of designating the saved. It and the expression “those that love God’ are descriptive, not of different persons, but of the same. The two clauses also express important facts in their lives.[52]Of deep interest is the “calling” mentioned here. Who are the called, and how does the calling occur? Paul gave the answer thus: Whereunto (unto which salvation) he called you through the gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ (2 Thessalonians 2:14). In one sense, the totality of human kind are called by the gospel, as indicated by Christ’s express command that the divine call should be proclaimed to “the whole creation”; but the phrase “according to his purpose” delimits the persons here spoken of to them that fulfilled God’s purpose through their affirmative response to the call. Called according to his purpose … means to be called “in one body (the church)” (Colossians 3:15), and that “through the church” there might be made known “the manifold wisdom of God, according to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Ephesians 3:10-11). This, properly understood, eliminates the widespread misunderstanding with regard to God’s calling of the redeemed. Paul here did not speak of individuals as such, but of the whole body of the saved. That body, composed of the whole number of the redeemed, is indeed called and foreordained to eternal glory; but of an individual person, it must be said that he is called from before all time and predestinated to everlasting life, only if his affirmative response to the divine call has brought him into union with Christ, and if he so continues. See under following verses. “Purpose …” here is translated from a Greek term [@prothesis], meaning God’s placing all future events before his mind so as distinctly to see them.[53]Thus, the germ of foreknowledge is found in the very first word of Paul’s revelation on this tremendous subject. God’s purposing was “kept in silence through times eternal” (Romans 16:25), and was an event prior to the creation of the world, “which in other generations was not made known” (Ephesians 3:5), “which hath been hid for ages and generations” (Colossians 1:26), “which God who cannot lie, promised before times eternal” (Titus 1:2). God’s eternal purpose of gathering the saved of all ages into one body “in Christ” was a design “which God foreordained before the worlds unto our glory” (1 Corinthians 2:7), which must be identified with “the mystery of God.” A careful study of the passages here cited shows that in all of the “mystery” passages Paul was speaking of “the wisdom of God” and of his “eternal purpose” of uniting all people in Christ through the church which is his body. A further word from Lard on this is: We now have but little difficulty explaining the clause “called according to his purpose.” In the [@prothesis] all things pertaining to man’s redemption were set before God, and among them his predetermination that man should be called by the gospel, “to which salvation he called you by our gospel.” Hence, to be called according to God’s purpose, [@prothesis], is to be called by the gospel. It is therefore not to be called by some secret impulse of the Holy Spirit; neither is it to be called “effectually,” or “ineffectually,” as the schoolmen phrase it. This call we are absolutely free to accept or reject; and, accordingly, as we do this or that, we shall be saved or lost.[54][50] Emil Brunner, op. cit., p. 77. [51] Sir Francis Bacon, in Bartlett’s Quotations, p. 109. [52] Moses E. Lard, op. cit., p. 280. [53] Ibid. [54] Ibid., p. 281. Verse 29 For whom he foreknew, he also foreordained to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.Godet’s incisive comment on the meaning of the word “foreknew” is helpful. There is not a passage in the New Testament where the word “know” does not above all contain the notion of “knowledge,” for this is the first and fundamental meaning. The same is the case with the word “foreknow.” … In Acts 2:23, “foreknowledge” is expressly distinguished from “the fixed decree” and consequently can denote nothing but prescience; and, as toRomans 11:2, “His people whom God foreknew,” the idea of knowledge is the leading one in the word “foreknew."[55]Therefore, the only thing meant by the word “foreknew” in this verse is that God knew in advance all that would happen. There is no reason at all why this thought should trouble people, but it does. People invariably suppose that by God’s foreknowledge of an event, he thereby became the cause of it, thus leaving no place for the freedom of the human will. That such a supposition is incorrect becomes clear in the analogy with human knowledge.
A man knows an event that took place in the past; and yet his knowledge cannot be viewed as causing the event to happen. God’s knowledge of the future is just like that, only covering a different period of time; and his eternal knowledge of what will happen cannot be viewed as the cause of those future events, nor as imposing any responsibility upon God for their occurrence. That Almighty God did actually know everything that would happen from all eternity is a fact totally beyond human comprehension, but the scriptural teaching of this fact is indisputable. In the background of Paul’s thought here, there was evidently the epic problem of God’s choice of Israel and apparent neglect of the Gentiles; because in Romans 11:2, he returned to this very word “foreknew” for the introduction of that subject there. The evident connection between what is said here and the Jew-Gentile problem discussed later was set forth in Locke’s paraphrase, thus: Bear, therefore, your sufferings with patience and constancy, for we certainly know that all things work together for good, to those that love God, who are called according to his purpose of calling Gentiles. In which purpose, Gentiles, whom he foreknew, as he did the Jews, with an intention of his kindness, and of making them his people, he preordained to be comformable to the image of his Son.[56]Foreordained to be conformed to the image of his Son … A glance at various translations and versions reveals the following words rendered for “foreordained”: did predestinate, predestined, ordained, pre-ordained, appointed, etc. Where there is so much disagreement among the greatest scholars, no one should fear to choose another meaning, especially when the true meaning is obvious, can be shown to be absolutely Pauline, and clears up all the problems. Much of the fog, as thick as the meringue on a pie, which has confused and obscured the meaning of Paul here, disappears in a little closer attention to the word “destined,” the same being the principal part of the word “predestined,” which is by far the favorite word of the scholars for this rendition. The syllable “pre” is simple enough and refers only to the time (before the foundation of the world) when God “destined” certain things to occur.
Therefore, we shall let the time element rest for the moment and focus upon what is meant by “destined.” God destined people to be conformed to the image of his Son, the meaning being obviously this that the destiny of every man ever born on earth was that he should obey God and be conformed to the image of God’s Son. “Destined” has special reference to the plan of God, his intention, the objective he had in view when man was created. Phillips translation of this place catches its meaning perfectly: He planned, in his purpose of love, that we should be adopted as his own children through Jesus Christ. That this is exactly what Paul meant is plain from what he wrote to the Ephesians: He destined us in love to be his sons through Jesus Christ (Ephesians 1:5, RSV). God’s plan for every man ever born was that he should love God and be conformed to the perfect image of God’s Son, Jesus Christ. To such a glorious end, God “destined him,” every man. If God had destined only a few people to receive such an inheritance, such an act of discrimination would have been unjust; and it may therefore be set aside as preposterous that God showed any such partiality. Once more, the master theme of this great epistle, God’s righteousness, is in focus in the words here, where Paul’s meaning is that even the Gentiles also were included in God’s loving plans. But, if all people are thus “destined” by God to be Christians, why are not all saved? God gave every person the absolute freedom of his will, and any man can therefore accept or refuse the destiny to which God called him. A man can live against his destiny, as evidenced by the fact that so many do; but, despite human sin, the essential glory of man’s true destiny is undeniable. Something of the nature and quality of the destiny God intended for all people is illustrated by the various destinies of Other portions of God’s creation. Thus a tiger was destined to live in the jungle, the fish in the water, the mole in the earth, the bird in the bush, and the bat in a cave. It is in such a broad frame of reference that man was destined to be a Christian, meaning that his true happiness, not merely hereafter but NOW, is best served by his conformity to the image of God’s Son. It was for that purpose that God made him, and every one of the more than seven billion cells in his physical body bears the imprimatur of the Holy Spirit. No wonder the “wages of sin is death”! Man living against his destiny and contrary to it is like the restless tiger, pacing the concrete floor of his cell in the zoo, until he leaves his tracks in blood upon the unyielding stone of his prison. In such a tragic state, the beast reveals to man the pathos of living contrary to his destiny. Such a view of the meaning of “destined” raises only one question, while answering many others, and that regards the reason why Paul restricted the meaning of “destined” in this place, apparently making it applicable only to those who actually became Christians. Godet’s careful exegesis clears that up, thus: (First, let it be remembered that Paul was here speaking of those who wereCALLED). All alike are seriously called. Only it happens that some consent to yield to the call, and some refuse. This distinction is indicated by Jesus in the saying, “Many are called, but few are chosen” (Matthew 20:16). The chosen in this passage are those who accept the call … those not accepting the call, remain called and nothing more, to their condemnation. In the epistles, the apostles addressing Christians, do not require to make this distinction, since the individuals they address are assumed to have answered the call from the very fact that they have voluntarily entered the church.
The case is like that of a man who should say to his guests assembled in his house: “Use everything that is here, for you are my invited guests.” It is obvious that by thus expressing himself, he would not be distinguishing invitation from acceptance, the latter being implied in the very fact of their presence.[57]In exactly the same manner, Paul’s reference to God’s having “destined” (or foreordained) certain ones to be Christians may not be restricted to mean that such was not the destiny of all people, for it is. In Godet’s illustration, above, the host’s reference to those assembled as his “invited guests” cannot mean that no others except those present had been invited. Paul’s use of “foreordained” here and “called” in the following verse may not be restricted to mean that no others were foreordained or called. From the above considerations, and many others, it appears that the true meaning of Paul in this verse is that God predestined every man ever born to be a Christian, that such a destiny, or plan, was in God’s original purpose before the world was, hence a pre-destiny, making Paul’s word here (foreordained or predestined) to be exactly correct and appropriate. If only all people could realize that they are, and were from all eternity, destined to serve Christ, such appearing in scripture as the sole reason for their creation, what an incentive would be provided for them to turn to the Lord. To be sure, a man can live against his destiny (the freedom of the will took care of that); but, if he does, he will get hurt (and God will take care of that!). The highest happiness attainable by mankind is procurable only in harmony with the intended destiny of humanity, that of being conformed to the image of God’s Son. There is no happiness comparable to that of the Christian life. Conformed to the image of his Son … is another expression that means “becoming a Christian,” but there is a specific reference also to the Christian’s being transformed into the image or likeness of Christ, in mind, character, obedience, and all other qualities and virtues of the soul; but it does not end there. Finally, the children of God will be raised from the dead in the true likeness of the risen Saviour. As John wrote: Beloved, now are we children of God, and it is not yet made manifest what we shall be. We know that if he shall be manifested, we shall be like him; for we shall see him even as he is (1 John 3:2). [55] F. Godet, op. cit., p. 325. [56] John Locke, op. cit., p. 334. [57] F. Godet, op. cit., p. 323. Verse 30 And whom he foreordained, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified,: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.The last clause of this great statement of the apostle, through its use of the past tense with the ultimate glory of the child of God, is plainly prophetic, viewing the entire scheme of redemption, from the beginning plan in the purpose of God before the world was created, to the final glory, as a single great design, encompassing within one grand operation the whole of time and temporal things. The predestined include all people, although many refuse their destiny: the called include all people, although many shall not heed it; the justified are they alone who through the obedience of faith are transferred into Christ, in whom alone justification is possible; and the glorified are those finally redeemed above. In view of these considerations, the mysterious doctrines of predestination, calling, election, etc., dissolve into this: God’s eternal purpose from times eternal, before the world was, determined that his Son, Jesus Christ, should lead an innumerable company of the redeemed out of earth’s populations, that these should be made righteous through perfect identification with Christ, as being truly “in him,” identifiable as his brethren, conformed to his likeness, and obedient to his will, this summing up of all thing in Christ being precisely the thing foreordained to happen. That body of Christ, the church, is destined to eternal glory, and to be presented before the throne of God’s glory in exceeding joy in absolute perfection; and all hell shall not prevent it, such having been foreordained from all eternity. All that is said in the New Testament regarding predestination refers to this eventual triumph of the redeemed” in Christ,” absolutely nothing whatever being able to forbid or prevent it; but all this has nothing at all to do with any individual person, as an individual, of whom nothing could be predestined, due to the freedom of his will. The predestined are those found “in Christ”; and the fairness and justice of this is inherent in the right of “whosoever will” to enter that company destined for eternal glory. Before taking up the study of the next part of this chapter, one other word regarding predestination is in order. Sanday has this: All we can say is that it (predestination) must not be interpreted in any sense that excludes free will. Free will is a postulate upon which all the superstructure of morals and religion must rest. The religious mind, looking back over the course by which it has been brought, sees in it the predominating hand of God; but. however large the divine element in salvation may be, it must in the end be apprehended by faith, which is an act of the free will.[58]Lard commented upon these two great errors often committed in the exposition of these verses, thus: These two great errors … consist, first, in assuming that an act of foreknowledge necessarily implies an act of unalterable pre-fixture by decree of every act of human life; and, secondly, that the predicates of “called,” “justified,” and “glorified” refer to (individual) human beings. If the reader will free his mind of these two errors, he will have no serious trouble in discovering the meaning of, perhaps, the sublimest passage in the Letter; but, unless he does this, he will find it a hopeless enigma. The ordinary modes of explaining this passage neither extract a ray of light from it, nor shed a ray of light upon it.[59][58] W. Sanday, op. cit., p. 238. [59] Moses E. Lard, op. cit., p. 285. Verse 31 What then shall we say to these things? If God be for us, who is against us?Seeing, as just stated, that God’s eternal purpose relative to the redeemed in Christ is absolutely certain of fulfillment, how solid and secure is the state of the person in Christ. “In Christ” is absolute safety, the only mortal concern of the Christian having to do, not with any doubt or uncertainty of final glory, but only with his being “in Christ” and remaining so. Given the integrity of that relationship, salvation for the child of God is a certainty. For the person “in Christ,” it is an unqualified fact that God is “for” him, with all that implies. God appears in this verse, not as a detached or disinterested judge, but as a helper, protector, and benefactor. As Paul put it, For it is God who worketh in you both to will and to work, for his good pleasure (Philippians 2:13). Verse 32 He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not also with him freely give us all things?The confidence of the apostle in this verse is founded upon the principle of logic called “a fortiori”, being a progression from the great to the lesser. The great gift is that of God’s only Son; and surely the love that provided such an unspeakable gift could not fail to provide whatever else might be required to accomplish his purpose of redeeming people, the particular things apparently in view here being whatever earthly encouragement and provision might be necessary to the achievement of the Christian’s ultimate salvation to the uttermost. Verse 33 Who shalt lay anything to the charge of God’s elect? It is God that justifieth; who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that was raised from the dead, who is at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.Locke paraphrased these verses thus: Who shall be the persecutor of those whom God hath chosen? Shall God who justifieth them? Who, as judge, shall condemn them? Christ that died for us, yea rather that is risen again for our justification, and is at the right hand of God making intercession for us?[60]Justifying his paraphrase in a footnote, Locke added: Reading this with an interrogation makes it needless to add any words to the text to make out the sense; and it is more conformable to the scheme of his argumentation here, as appears byRomans 8:35, where the interrogation cannot be avoided. It is, as it were, an appeal to them themselves to be the judges whether any of those things he mentions to them (reckoning up these which had the most power to hurt them) could give them just cause for apprehension: “Who shall accuse you? Shall God who justifies you? Who shall condemn you? Christ who died for you?[61][60] John Locke, op. cit., p. 335. [61] Ibid. Verse 35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or anguish, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? Even as it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; We were accounted as sheep for the slaughter.In this and following verses, Paul mentioned the things conceived of as hostile, and hindering to the Christian’s life; and most of the things here mentioned should be understood as lying within the ordinary daily experience of the Christians of that age. The love of Christ … refers not to our love for him, but to his love for us. The scripture quoted by Paul here is Psalms 44:22; and his employment of the expression “even as it is written” was his way of saying, “This is just our lot, exactly as the scriptures teach.” Like many other lists found in the Pauline writings, this one should be understood as representative rather than exhaustive. Verse 37 For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers nor height, nor depth nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.All of the calamities mentioned here were suffered by Paul himself, as a glance at 2 Corinthians 11 will show; and, despite the fact of all things working together for good for Christians, the hardships and sufferings they endure prove that no exemption from life’s sorrows has been provided for them. On the contrary, it was doubtless a fact that the Christians of that age suffered far more than other groups of mankind; and, due to the natural discouragement arising from such extraordinary sufferings, there was a constant temptation for the Christians to fall into doubt and discouragement, or grow cold in their love to the Lord, or to acquire deep feelings of guilt arising from a view of their hardships as being caused by their sins. It has ever been the tendency of troubled individuals to become depressed and doubtful, as was the case with John the Baptist when thrown into prison (Matthew 11:2). Paul in this marvelous peroration emphasized the fact that all guilt had been removed through the death of Christ, that condemnation of God’s children is impossible. God himself is “for them.” What a shout of victory is this passage! Height … depth … Locke understood these to mean “the height of prosperity” or the “depth of misery.” Life … in this context was interpreted by Lard as meaning the hard life they were called upon to live in the flesh, life with its burdens, toils and persecutions. Angels … if understood as a reference to good angels are only a conceptual hindrance to the Christian, meaning that even if an angel were to try to hinder them, such would be impossible; but if the word should be understood of Satan’s angels (Matthew 25:41), the meaning is the same. Not even Satan’s angels may finally hinder the child of God. Whiteside pointed out that the impossibility of apostasy is not what Paul was teaching here. He wrote: All the things mentioned are things without. Nothing is here said of what corrupting influences may do to the heart. No powers of persecutions can compel one to stop loving God; if he quits, he does it of his own accord. Love cannot be destroyed by force of imperial command, but it may wax cold. Some even depart from their first love (Revelation 2:4). Paul recognized that people depart from the faith, but he was persuaded that no evils coming on us from without could destroy the love of God.[62]Whiteside’s point is well taken; but it is God’s love for man, not the other way around, that Paul primarily had in view here. In Christ Jesus our Lord … is the final word of this flourishing burst of eloquence; and it brings the mind back to the major proposition underlying all that Paul wrote, which is this, that salvation is “in Christ” alone, and that the totality of the Christian’s hope derives from the fact of his having been baptized into Christ (the only scriptural baptism being that of a true believer who is penitent), and from the presumption of his continuance therein (in Christ) “unto death.” Paul wrote many things, but the expression “in Christ” or its equivalent is the theme of all that he wrote, being mentioned no less than 169 times; and any “system” that omits this is like a symphony from which both the tonic and dominant chords have been deleted. Paul never left it out! Here is the point where his mind always came to rest. One is reluctant to go on from the magnificent teachings of this wonderful chapter, even for the purpose of further studying Paul’s epic letter; and, by way of a final salute to the inspiring thoughts of this chapter, the following words of Moule are appended: Some years ago, we remember reading this close of the eighth chapter, under moving circumstances. On a cloudless January night, late arrived in Rome, we stood in the Coliseum, a party of friends from England. Orion, the giant with the sword, glimmered like a specter of persecution over the huge precinct; for the full moon, high in the heavens, overpowered the stars. By its light, we read from a little Testament these words written so long ago to be read in that same city - written by the man whose dust now sleeps at Tre Fontane, where the executioner dismissed him to be with Christ; written to men and women, some of whom, in all human likelihood at least, suffered in that very amphitheater, raised only twenty-two years after Paul wrote Romans, and soon made the scene of countless martyrdoms. … We read the words of the Epistle, and gave thanks to him who had there triumphed in his saints over life and death, over beasts and men and demons. Then we thought of ourselves, in our circumstances so totally different on the surface, yet carrying the same needs in their depths.
Are we too to overcome, in “the things present” of our modern world, and in the face of “the things to come” yet upon our earth? Are we too to be “more than conquerors,” winning blessing out of all things, and really living in our generation as the bondmen of Christ and the sons of God?[63][62] R. L. Whiteside, op. cit., p. 193. [63] H. C. G. Moule, op. cit., pp. 242-243.
Questions by E.M. Zerr For Romans 81. To whom is there no condemnation? 2. On what further condition is this favor? 3. What is meant by “ law of sin and death” ? 4. How does one become free from this law ? 5. Cite verse chapter 6 which tells when this is done. 6. Was there anything the law could not do ? 7. Through what was the weakness? 8. In what form was Christ sent to the world? 9. How was such form accomplished for him? 10. Was his mother normally human? 11. In what did Christ condemn sin? 12. What was to be accomplished by this act? 13. On what condition can man accomplish this end? 14. How may the Spirit lead us ? 15. What things do the flesh and spirit mind? 16. State result of being carnally minded. 17. What is meant by the carnal mind? 18. To what kind of death does this all refer? 19. Name an impossibility as to the carnal mind. 20. Another about those in the flesh. 21. Then how may we live right while in the body? 22. What must be in us to enable us to live right? 23. In what ordinance does he get into us? 24. Can we be dead and alive at the same time? 25. By what spirit will we be quickened? 26. Where must this spirit be to accomplish this ? 27. To what are we not debtors? 28. State result of living after the flesh. 29. Explain “ mortify deeds of the body.” 30. What determines our being sons of God? 31. What spirit have we not received? 32. State the relation we sustain to God. 33. Tell what title this leads us to acknowledge. 34. Name the spirits which bear testimony together. 35. What is the subject of their testimony ? 36. What advantage does this relationship bring? 37. Who is our joint heir? 38. On what further condition is this based ? 39. What is greater than the present suffering? 40. Is this glory possessed now? 41. Who is the eerature of verse 19 and others? 42. To what does “manifestation” refer? 43. When did verse 20 take place? 44. Who is the antecedent of “ him” ? 45. To what does this hope refer? 46. When will the deliverance of verse 21 occur? 47. To whom does “ whole creation” refer? 48. Who are meant by “ ourselves” in 23rd verse? 49. For what are they groaning and waiting? 50. By what are we saved? 51. Can hope see? 52. What quality shows we have this hope? 53. State what helps our infirmities. 54. What do we not know? 55. Tell what the Spirit makes for us. 56. They “ cannot be uttered” by whom ? 57. Who is it that “ searcheth the hearts” ? 58. Tell us what he knows. 59. For whom is intercession made? 60. According to what? 61. Of what does Paul say he is in knowledge? 62. Does this teach “ special providence” ? 63. What did God also do to those whom he foreknew? 64. Among whom was Christ to be the first born? 65. The firstborn from what? 66. Was Christ first person ever brought to life ? 67. Wherein was the preeminence mentioned here ? 68. What else did God do to the ones predestinated? 69. Describe how justification is accomplished. 70. If God is for us then what? 71. Whom did God not spare? 72. He “ delivered him up” to whom? 73. May God’ s elect be justly charged? 74. What truth is here stated as basis of your answer? 75. At what place is Christ now seated? 76. What is he doing for us ? 77. What can separate us from the love of Christ? 78. For whose sake are saints killed? 79. In the contest who are conquerors? 80. Of what was Paul persuaded ?
Romans 8:1
8:1 Rom 8:1. No condemnation refers to the deliverance from the dead body in chapter 7:24. However, to continue in the freedom, one must continue to walk according to the inclinations of the “inner man,” instructed and guided by the law of the Spirit.
Romans 8:2
8:2 Rom 8:2. Law of the Spirit is the Gospel, and it is called of life because it will guide one into a spiritual life in this world, and prepare him for eternal life in the next. Sin and death is explained at Romans 7:5-6.
Romans 8:3
8:3 Rom 8:3. The law was not adapted to meet (through its own merits) the needs of fleshly weakness. Jesus came in the flesh, the same kind of body that sinful men have. While in that body He condemned sin by living free from it, then offering that body as a sacrifice for sin.
Romans 8:4
8:4 Romans 8:4. Righteousness of the law means that required by it, but unattained on account of the weakness of the flesh as explained in the preceding verse.
Romans 8:5
8:5 Romans 8:5. See the paragraph of Rom 7:15-21.
Romans 8:6
8:6 Romans 8:6. Carnally minded denotes a yearning for fleshly pleasure.
Romans 8:7-8
7-8 Romans 8:7-8. See paragraph of Rom 7:5-6.
Romans 8:9
8:9 Romans 8:9. Not in the flesh is explained at verse 1. Spirit of Christ is equivalent to “Christ be in you” in the following verse.
Romans 8:10
:10 Romans 8:10. The body means the “old man” of Romans 6:6. It died to sin by repentance, and the spirit (inner man) came to life through the righteousness of Christ.
Romans 8:11
:11 Rom 8:11. The good and bad will all be raised through Christ, but the good only will be raised to life everlasting. (See John 11:26; 1 Corinthians 15:49-53.)
Romans 8:12
:12 Rom 8:12. Are debtors. Are obligated, but not to the flesh to live after it.
Romans 8:13
:13 Rom 8:13. This is the same as verse 6.
Romans 8:14
:14 Romans 8:14. The Spirit of God operates through the Gospel (John 14:16-17). Being willing to be led by that instruction shows one to have been begotten of God.
Romans 8:15
:15 Romans 8:15. This verse makes a comparison of the difference between a servant and an heir. (See Galatians 4:1-7.) These Jewish Christians had been made free from the law through Christ, which entitled them to recognize God as their Father.
Romans 8:16
:16 Romans 8:16. Beareth witness with all comes from one Greek word, SUMMAR-TUREO, which Thayer defines, “To bear witness with, bear joint witness.” Hence the phrase does not indicate any communication between these two witnesses, but that each one gives the same testimony on the subject, namely, that the persons are children of God. That is, the Spirit states through the Gospel what it takes to make one a child of God, and the spirit (mind) of a man knows whether he has done that. If he has, the conclusion is that he is a child of God.
Romans 8:17
:17 Romans 8:17. This relationship makes one an heir of God, since only his children can inherit the divine riches. Such a man is a joint-heir with Christ in that He too is the Son of God. If so be is virtually the same proviso mentioned in verse 1.
Romans 8:18
:18 Romans 8:18. Following Christ includes suffering persecutions with him if need be. Such sufferings are nothing in comparison with the glorious reward to be received.
Romans 8:19
:19 Romans 8:19. The creature signifies human beings in general. Every man (though some unconsciously) wants something better than he is enjoying in his frail, decaying body. Paul calls the state that is thus yearned for the manifestation of the sons of God, and that is the same as the redemption of our body in verse 23.
Romans 8:20
:20 Romans 8:20. Vanity is from which Thayer defines in this place, “Frailty, want of vigor.” It means the human creature was made subject to decay of the body, and that took place when he was driven from the tree of life. Not willingly. No, he had to be driven out (Genesis 3:24). Him means God, who subjected man to an existence that would end in death of the body, but at the same time gave him hope of a deathless body in another world. (See verse 23.)
Romans 8:21
:21 Rom 8:21. The promise in this verse is for those only who are faithful children of God. The corruption and incorruption are explained by 1 Corinthians 15:52-54.
Romans 8:22
:22 Rom 8:22. This is the same as verse 19.
Romans 8:23
:23 Rom 8:23. Not only they means not only the human family in general. Firstfruits of the Spirit means the indwelling of the Holy Spirit that is the possession of all who come into the body of Christ. (See the comments on Acts 5:32.) To groan means to sigh or earnestly to long for the redemption of the body, which means the resurrection.
Romans 8:24-25
Romans 8:24-25. Saved by hope denotes that our hope for everlasting life prompts us to persevere in the kind of conduct that is necessary to receive everlasting life.
Romans 8:26
:26 Romans 8:26. A safe rule is to let one passage help us understand another, when both are on the same subject, and one seems more difficult than the other. A companion passage for our present one is Ephesians 3:20, which the reader should see at once. We know that no communication is given to man today on spiritual matters except what can be read in the Bible. Therefore, that which the Spirit does for Christians is a part of the plan of God and Christ for taking care of the Christians’ prayers. The Spirit (which can read our minds) forms our prayers as to the wording, so that they are in presentable form to offer before the throne, doing it with groanings (sighing) which cannot be uttered (by us).
Romans 8:27
:27 Romans 8:27. This verse verifies the comments on the preceding one. He means the Lord, who not only can read the mind of the saints (Christians), but also knows the mind of the Spirit, since he is the third member of the Godhead, and is subject to the Father and the Son. Therefore, when the Spirit presents the intercessions of the saints to the throne, in groanings that man cannot utter, that form of the prayer virtually becomes the petition of the Christian, addressed to God through Christ who is the official or authoritative Advocate.
Romans 8:28
:28 Romans 8:28. This verse does not teach “special providence” as some believe. It means that if a man loves the Lord, he will make “stepping-stones” out of his “stumbling-stones.” He will so work on the conditions of life (even his sufferings, verse 18), that they will assure him the good reward that God has promised to the faithful. The called refers to the men and women who have heard and accepted the call through the Gospel to serve the Lord. The final reward for such service will be to receive a body that can never die, fashioned after that of Christ. (Philippians 3:21); and as an evidence that God can do such a marvelous work, He decreed to bestow that very favor on some of the saints before the general resurrection, which is the subject of verses 29, 30.
Romans 8:29-30
Romans 8:29-30. Of course the Lord will not grant the glorious resurrection to any but faithful saints, hence Paul begins his account of this particular group with the event of their entrance into His service. That was when they were called by the law in force in their day. Those who accepted the call were justified or made free from their past sins. It was required, also, that these persons be faithful till death, which would constitute them “saints that slept.” God never predestinates any certain person as to his character, but He did predetermine what kind of conduct would receive certain favors. The Lord foresaw some who were going to develop such a character, and among them He predestinated a group to come out of their graves to die no more, giving them the same form or bodily image that the Son received, so that he (the Son) could be the firstborn (from the grave to die no more) among many brethren.
To be among them would mean to be associated with them in the same event. Hence we read (Matthew 27:52-53) about these saints that arose after the resurrection of Jesus. They are the glorified ones of verse 30 here, who were given bodies to die no more. As such, they would not remain on earth, hence when Jesus ascended to Heaven he took them with him. This is what Paul means in Ephesians 4:8 where he says Christ “led captivity captive.” (Marginal, “led a multitude of captives.”) These had been captives in the unseen state, but were now made free forever and taken along with their Lord in a glorified state. When Jesus comes again he will bring them back with him to witness the execution of judgment upon the ungodly (Jude 1:14-15).
Romans 8:31
:31 Rom 8:31. If God can thus give glorified life to thousands of his saints so long before the general resurrection, He certainly can do the same for all others who will be faithful until death. No wonder the apostle said as to these things that since God is for us, no one can be against us.
Romans 8:32
:32 Rom 8:32. Paul reasons that God will freely give us all -these things, since He did not spare his Son to make the provision on our behalf, who also led the way by being faithful to God, and then going triumphant through the unseen world.
Romans 8:33
:33 Rom 8:33. God’s elect means those who are chosen of God, and such are the ones who obey God’s law. It also means those whom God justifieth or declares freed from sin. What reason, then, would anyone have to charge anything to such persons?
Romans 8:34
:34 Romans 8:34. This question is simlar to the one in the preceding verse. Since Christ died for these chosen ones, and took his place by the Father’s right hand after his resurrection, He will intercede for them when enemies condemn them.
Romans 8:35
:35 Romans 8:35. This question implies a similar answer to the foregoing. When Christ loves us, these hardships cannot separate us from Him.
Romans 8:36
:36 Romans 8:36. Killed all the day long denotes that the Lord’s disciples were threatened with death constantly, as if they were fit only for slaughter.
Romans 8:37
:37 Romans 8:37. More than conquerors is defined in the lexicon as, “a surpassing victory.” A man might win in a physical combat with another athlete, which would be a simple victory only. But if it was a struggle to repossess a treasure that the other contestant had taken from him, the success would be more than a simple victory. Our combat with Satan is to redeem our soul which he had caused to be endangered.
Romans 8:38-39
Romans 8:38-39. Note that none of these things can rob us of the love of God. But that does not say that we ourselves could not forfeit it by becoming unfaithful to Him.
