Menu

241 Sermon Illustrations on Resurrection

241 illustrations Page 4 of 5

Resurrection in Christian preaching signifies the victory over death and the promise of eternal life through Christ's rising (1 Corinthians 15:20-22). Illustrations often use images of life restored after long death, personal encounters affirming Christ's living presence, and the unstoppable divine power that secures resurrection despite opposition (John 11:25). This theme encourages faith that death is but a sleep before awakening to new life.

Love Was When

John 1:29

Love was when God became a man

Locked in time and space without rank or place;

Love was God born of Jewish kin,

Just a carpenter with some fishermen.

Love was when Jesus walked in history —

Lovingly He brought a new life that’s free;

Love was God nailed to bleed and die

To reach and love one such as I.

Love was when God became a man

Down where I could see love that reached to me;

Love was God dying for my sin —

And so trapped was I my whole world caved in.

Love was when Jesus rose to walk with me —

Lovingly He brought a new life that’s free;

Love was God — only He would try

To reach and love one such as I.

*

from Praise! (Singspiration Music) · John E Walvoord © 1970 Singspiration via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database incarnationresurrection

A Glorious Body

In the days when any country boy could stand in front of a blacksmith's shop and watch with fascinated eyes what happened there, something analogous to the resurrection of the body occurred. The smith would put a rusty, cold, dull piece of iron into the fire, and, after awhile, take that identical piece of iron out of the fire, but now bright and glowing. Thus it will be with our bodies: they are laid down in the grave, dead, heavy, earthly; but at the general resurrection this dead, heavy, earthly body shall arise living and glorious.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

No Tomb to Visit

In one of the villages of Northern India a missionary was preaching in a bazaar. As he closed, a Muslim gentleman came up and said, "You must admit we have one thing you have not, and it is better than anything you have."

The missionary smiled and said, "I should be pleased to hear what it is."

The Muslim said, "You know when we go to Mecca we at least find a coffin. But when you Christians go to Jerusalem, which is your Mecca, you find nothing but an empty grave."

But the missionary just smiled and said, "That is just the difference.

Mohammed is dead; Mohammed is in the coffin. And false systems of religion and philosophy are in their coffins, but Jesus Christ, whose kingdom is to include all nations and kindreds and tribes, is not here; He is risen. And all power in heaven and on earth is given unto Him. That is our hope."

A living Christ! That is our hope. He is not dead, but alive forevermore.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

The Living One

A Mohammedan and a Christian were discussing their religions and had agreed that both Mohammed and Christ were prophets. Where, then, lay the difference? The Christian illustrated it this way: “I came to a crossroads and I saw a dead man and a living man. Which one did I ask for directions?”

The response came quickly, “The living one, of course.”

“Why, then,” asked his friend, “do you send me to Mohammed who is dead, instead of Christ who is alive?”

This is the basic difference between Christ and every other religious leader. All the others came into the world, lived, and died-but none of them lived again. The resurrection of Christ was the one event that persuaded His disciples once for all that He was the Christ, God's Son.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database islam

The Corruptible Made Incorruptible

A professor of biology made it his custom to stand before his students holding up a little seed between his thumb and forefinger. When he bowed before the seed, his students were mystified. This university professor had spent his whole life studying the beginning of life, and he acknowledged to his students that it was still a mystery to him. He said: "I know exactly what this seed consists of in the exact proportions of water, carbon, and other elements. I can mix these individual elements and make a seed that will look exactly like this one. If I plant the seed that I have compounded, it will rot. The various elements I have put together will be absorbed by the ground.

However, if I sow the seed that God made, it will spring up into a plant, because it contains that mysterious element we call life." The physical resurrection of Christ is just as much a mystery. In fact, the life you now possess which causes your body to function and renew itself continually, and not collapse into a putrefying mass, is also a mystery. He, therefore, who in the beginning created our present corruptible bodies, will also create a new body without having to collect the various elements of our old ones from the earth.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

The Disciples Made No Relic of Christ's Tomb

If ye seek Jesus, do not go to His grave. You will not find Him there.

Is it not quite striking that after the disciples were convinced that He had risen they never again visited His tomb? At least there is no record of it. Why should they? It was only an incident, a temporary halting place in the experience of our Lord. They did not make pilgrimages to it. They did not esteem it above any other place. They did not bury it beneath tokens of affection. They did not break off pieces of the rock and keep them as relics for seeking souls to look at in the hope of meriting divine favor.

No, after that first Sunday evening, the disciples were done with the tomb. Why should they give their time to the veneration of places, when they had the living Savior with them? To us, Christ is all and in all. He is alive, and He has power to give life. Not by meat and drink, not by pilgrimages and fastings, but by looking unto Him do we enter into life that death cannot touch.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

My Resurrection Has Come

Suppose a visitor to our earth from another planet were to see a caterpillar on a rosebush, and a conversation could take place between them. It might go something like this: "How ugly you are and how gross, doing nothing but eat, eat, eat, all day long," says the visitor. "True," replies the caterpillar, "but I won't always be like this. Some day I'll have beautiful wings, and fly from flower to flower." "A likely story," says the visitor with a laugh. A few days later, this stranger finds a hard brown chrysalis on the rosebush and is surprised to hear the caterpillar's voice saying, "Now I'm worse off than before. You think I'm dead because I can neither move nor eat, but soon I shall have a resurrection and fly in the sun." "Poor deluded worm," says the visitor, "you'd better accept the fact that your life is over." But about three weeks later, the stranger, strolling in the rose garden, is surprised to hear the caterpillar's voice again. Looking for the chrysalis, he sees one beautiful wing and then another unfolding from its cracked shell. "You see," says the voice, "my resurrection has come," and spreading its wings the butterfly flits away to enjoy its wonderful new existence.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

A Solitary Grain

In April, the Sunday school teacher asked all eight children in her class to hide within an empty container a small object that represented life in the spring.

Not wanting to embarrass eight-year-old Stephen, whose mental retardation was becoming more manifest, the teacher suggested that the children all place their unlabeled containers on her desk. Since she feared that Stephen might not have caught on, she decided that she should open them.

The first had a tiny flower. "What a lovely sign of new life!" "I brought that one!" the donor exclaimed. Next came a rock. "That must be Stephen's," the teacher thought, since rocks do not symbolize new life. But Billy shouted that his rock had moss on it, and moss was new life. The teacher agreed.

A butterfly flew from the third container, and another child bragged that her choice was best of all.

The fourth container was empty. "That has to be Stephen's," thought the teacher, quickly reaching for the fifth.

"Please, don't skip mine!'Stephen interjected. "But it's empty."

"That's right," said Stephen. "The tomb was empty, and that is new life for everyone."

Later that summer, Stephen's condition grew worse, and he died. On his casket at the funeral, mourners found eight containers. They were ALL EMPTY.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

One Day!

1. One day when heaven was filled with His praises,

One day when sin was a black as could be,

Jesus came forth to be born of a virgin,

Dwelt among men – my Example is He!

Chorus

Living – He loved me, dying He saved me,

Buried – He carried my sins far away;

Rising – He justified freely, forever:

One day He's coming – O glorious day!

2. One day they led him up Calvary's mountain,

One day they nailed Him to die on the tree;

Suffering anguish, despised and rejected

Bearing our sins, my Redeemer is He!

3. One day, they left Him alone in the garden,

One day He rested, from suffering free;

Angels came down o’er His tomb to keep vigil–

Hope of the hopeless, my Saviour is He!

4. One day the grave could conceal Him no longer,

One day the stone rolled away from the door;

Then He arose, over death He had conquered,

Now is ascended, my Lord evermore!

5. One day the trumpet will sound for His coming,

One day the skies with His glory will shine;

Wonderful day, my beloved ones bringing!

Glorious Saviour, this Jesus is mine!

*

Like Him We Rise

1 Corinthians 15:20

We usually remember to consider the idea of resurrection in the springtime. People draw parallels between the new life of the budding trees and reproducing wildlife and the resurrection of Jesus Christ on Easter Sunday. If one thinks about it, however, the recurring cycles of nature, of death and birth, are startlingly different from Christ's resurrection from the dead.

We live in a world of death. The growth of living plants depends on the decomposition of dead ones. If the Lord tarries, every one of us will die, and this truth is brought home when a person known for his or her vivacity is diagnosed with a terminal disease. On his deathbed, Matthew Henry (the well-known Bible commentator) is reported to have said, “Tomorrow I am not sure whether or not I will be in the land of the dying.” [1] He spoke well when he called this the land of the dying, for every day leads us closer to our end. For those who die a natural death, death may come gradually. The body weakens, experiences pain, and little by little slips into death. The poet John Donne in his Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions chronicled twenty-three stages of sickness preceding death. Those of us whom God blesses with long life will come upon death in stages and in due season, just as summer turns into fall.

Resurrection, on the other hand, is an abrupt and rare occurrence. It has more in common with an immediate death by a tragic accident than with the customary dying process. One moment Christ was dead; the next he lived. I love the archaic term for bringing to life: to quicken. One moment Christ was among the dead; the next he joined the quick. Songwriter Michael Card penned these lyrics: Love crucified arose/ And the grave became a place of hope/ For the heart that sin and sorrow broke/ Is beating once again. The resurrection was a case in which a heart that had not beaten for three days suddenly began pumping blood again. If Christ's death in the middle of the afternoon caused the sky to go black, what must have happened when he opened his eyes in the middle of the night?

This abrupt reversal of the natural order of things is the key to all our hopes. Our hope is not that spring will come again; spring is always followed by fall and then winter. Rather, we believe that the death-cycle will be reversed. Christ's resurrection is the precursor to the resurrection of those who believe in Him. 1 Corinthians 15:20 says, “But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep.”

One of the best poetic texts on Christ's resurrection is Charles Wesley's hymn “Christ the Lord is Risen Today.” The final verse says:

Soar we now where Christ has led,

Following our exalted Head;

Made like Him, like Him we rise;

Ours the cross, the grave, the skies.

Let us ponder the meaning of resurrection in every season, not just in the spring, as we wait in hope for the day when we too will undergo that dramatic transformation.

____________

1. Quoted by Paul Kooistra in Network Magazine, Summer 2003.

____________

Copyright © 2003 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

Mother's Letter To Her Soldier Son

John 5:13

Here’s an excerpt from a mother’s letter to her son in the military service. “Jimmy, when you get home, we won’t be at the same place. Your dad read in the paper that most accidents happen within 5 miles of home, so we moved.”

I’m moving, too, but when it happens, the move will be vertical, and it won’t be an accident. Our quartet used to sing, “I’m moving up home some day.” I can’t imagine what it would be like not to be certain that if I died tonight, I would wake up in the presence of my Savior. My reservation is in — my ticket has been bought with the terrible cost of my Savior’s life — I’m ready. How about you — going with me?

In I John 5:13 (NIV) we read, “I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God so that you may know that you have eternal life.” You’ll notice the positive word KNOW — not guess, hope or assume. Maybe that’s why I sleep so good. You can be sure, too. Think about it through your wonderful day.

My wife says, “We have no trouble keeping up with the expenses — they’re everywhere.” Inflation is when the buck doesn’t stop anywhere. We just caught up with the Joneses, and then they refinanced.

The news media keeps reporting that the economy is good. So far we’re making it on retirement income, but we have the best eternal retirement plan going — it’s out of this world!

I Cor. 15:51,52 (NIV): “… we will all be changed — in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will all be changed.” Wow — I’ll get my arm back! I Cor. 2:9 (NIV): “No eye has seen, nor ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those who love him.” Live today in the joy of your expectations for your eternal future.

from Source not recorded · Unknown Mother via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

A Bible Scholar's Defense of the Resurrection

Luke 24:11

Bishop N.T. Wright is a famous biblical scholar, and the author of THE RESURRECTION OF THE SON OF GOD. Wright arrgues that bodily resurrection is the most plausible HISTORICAL account of what happened three days after Jesus was crucified.

Wright's defense of the resurrection story:

Well, we know quite a lot about first-century Jewish movements, many of which ended with the leader’s death. I’ve tried to imagine myself in the world of someone like Josephus, the first-century Jewish historian. He hears about the demise of a messianic leader or prophetic leader, and is told that this leader has been raised from the dead. He is going to ask: What do you mean he’s been raised from the dead? And he will not be satisfied if the answer is: Well, I had this vision, or I felt my heart warmed, or I felt that God had forgiven me for letting the leader down. He would say, “Well, fine, I’m glad you had that experience. But why did you say he’s been raised from the dead?” My point is that resurrection is something that had a quite clear meaning at that time. It was something that every pagan knew doesn’t happen. And a lot of Jews (the Sadducees and some others) believed it doesn’t happen. Those who did affirm the resurrection did not think it was just away of saying, “He is Lord.”

The historian has to offer a plausible hypothesis of why the disciples used the language of resurrection. My hypothesis is that there were two things: an empty tomb and sightings of Jesus. An empty tomb by itself doesn’t mean that much, nor do visions -- many people have had visions, particularly after somebody they love has just died. Given the accounts of the empty tomb and of the sightings, however, I think the historian is faced with two parts of an arch with the piece in the middle -- the resurrection -- missing. The question is: Are these just two isolated phenomena?

The historian cannot prove the resurrection in the same way that one can prove that Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD. But I think the historian can say: Here are the plausible explanations. And there is an extreme implausibility of virtually all the rival suggestions, such as the one that James, the brother of the Lord, was walking around in the garden at the same time, and because he looked rather like Jesus, the women saw him in the half light. That story is not going to last more than an hour or two.

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #5714]

One Guy Didn't

• Three guys were tried for crimes against humanity. Two guys committed crimes. One didn’t.

• Three guys were given government trials. Two guys had fair trials. One didn’t.

• Three guys were whipped and beaten. Two guys had it coming. One didn’t.

• Three guys were given crosses to carry. Two guys earned their crosses. One didn’t.

• Three guys were mocked and spit at along the way. Two guys cursed and spit back. One didn’t.

• Three guys were nailed to crosses. Two guys deserved it. One didn’t.

• Three guys talked while they were hung on their crosses. Two guys argued. One didn’t.

• Three guys agonized over their abandonment. Two guys had reason to be abandoned. One didn’t.

• Three guys knew death was coming. Two guys resisted. One didn’t.

• One. Two. Three guys died on three crosses.

• Three days later. Two guys remained in their graves. One didn’t.

from Source not recorded · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrection

New Life!

1. Gone is the guilt of my sin,

Peace is now reigning within;

Since I believed — pardon received —

Happy, so happy I’ve been.

Chorus:

New life in Christ, abundant and free!

What glories shine, what joys are mine,

What wondrous blessings I see!

My past with its sin, the searching and strife,

Forever gone — there's a bright new dawn!

For in Christ I have found new life!

2. Brighter the journey each day,

Though there is much to dismay;

Heaven awaits — bright pearly gates —

There at the end of the way.

3. Come with your sin-burdened heart,

Christ will His cleansing impart;

He will forgive — in Him you’ll live —

Oh how the joybells will start.

from Praise! (singspiration Music) · John Willard Peterson (1921- )© 1963 by John W. Peterson Music Company via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database liferesurrection

Vistas of the Super Victory

Acts 17:31

”The power of His resurrection.” — Philippians 3:10

What infinitudes in one short phrase – “the power of His resurrection!” What vistas the super victory of that vacated sepulcher opens up! You and I are meant to know “the power of His resurrection” in its various aspects toward ourselves.

How vital is its evidential power! The classic Corinthian passage on the subject makes it the prime apologetic of the Christian faith. “If Christ be not raised, your faith is vain.” Its justifying power is complete. “He was raised again for our justification” (Romans 4:25). “Who is he that condemneth? Christ died, yea rather that is risen again” (Romans 8:33,34). How wonderful is its quickening power! We are “raised up together” with Him in spiritual union. We “walk in newness of life” and “sit together with Him” in “heavenly places” (Ephesians 2:5,6). How reassuring is its certifying power! “God hath given assurance unto all men in that He hath raised Him from the dead” (Acts 17:31). What greater public proof could there be that the atonement is accepted, that Satan is defeated and the power of death is broken? (Read Romans 5:10, II Timothy 2:14). How unmistakable is its demonstrative power! “Destroy this temple,” says our Lord Jesus, “and in three days I will raise it up” (John 2:19-21). He said it and His resurrection demonstrates it (Read John 10:17) . How precious is its consoling power! The risen Victor is the tenderhearted Savior who not only “ever liveth to make intercession” for us, but is “touched with the feeling of our infirmities”, and is our constant Companion, “even unto the end of the age” (Hebrews 7:25; 4:15; Matthew 28:20). How titanic in prospect is its reanimating power! “Now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept” (I Corinthians 15:20). He is the pledge and specimen of the mighty resurrection-harvest yet to be..

How wonderful then is its liberating power in the hearts and minds and experience of His blood-bought people! It was this which Paul longed to prove more and more when he wrote the words in our text, “That I may know Him, and the power of His resurrection.”

Think how “the power of His resurrection” is exhibited in our Lord Himself. First, it crowns His victory over self. From first to last He had answered a firm “No” to every movement of His human nature which would have infringed upon His utter loyalty to the Father’s will, “even to the death of the Cross” ; and now that emptied sepulcher in culmination testifies His complete victory over human self. Second, it proclaims His victory over sin. Had there been sin, death could have held Him; but the Father now gives crowning assurance that there is no sin in His incarnate Son. Third, it manifests His victory over death. “Death hath no more dominion over Him” (Romans 6:9). Fourth, it signalizes His victory over Satan. At last, One stronger than the strong has come to the rescue. He has broken the power of Satan over mankind, and wrenched from him the keys of hell and death. Now “the power of His resurrection” is given availability to all Christian believers. A crowned Christ in a consecrated, prayerful heart makes it all real again today — victory over self and sin and Satan, and even death.

— the Evangelist, news-magazine of the Evangelical Tract Distributors, P.O. Box 146, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5J 2G9 – 1-780-477-1538 – www.evangelicaltract.com – support@evangelicaltract.com

from The Evangelist · J. Sidlow Baxter via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrection

Why I Believe In the Resurrection

1 Corinthians 15:13

Can a well-educated person really believe all that “Jesus stuff?” Is there compelling evidence to support a faith in the Jesus of the Bible? A man who claims to be God, who claims to be the giver of eternal life and who claims to be the source of absolute truth?

The answer to these questions begins with one central block, one foundation. If this central block is true, we're set - if it is false, everything we believe in Christianity is a hoax. That central block is the resurrection.

The validity of our faith is held up by the intellectual feasibility of the resurrection. Put simply, if Christ didn't die on the cross and come alive again three days later, our faith is worthless. Think I'm being over zealous? Consider what the Apostle Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians 15:13-14, “But if there is no resurrection of the dead, not even Christ has been raised; and if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain, your faith is also in vain.” The writers of scripture say that if the resurrection - the literal physical bodily resurrection of Jesus - isn't true, Christianity doesn't hold water. Why I Believe in the Resurrection briefly highlights six reasons why the resurrection is true and ultimately why we can put our faith in Jesus.

ONE: THE HISTORICITY OF JESUS OF NAZARETH IS AIRTIGHT

Did He really exist? Did that really happen? Or is this like King Arthur? Is it myth, legend, or did Jesus of Nazareth historically live in space and time and walk upon the earth?

The reality of His historicity is airtight. The quality and quantity of the biblical manuscripts as well as first century Greek documents overwhelmingly demonstrate that He actually lived.

The New Testament is built on history. An example of this history stems from Luke 2:2 where we learn that at the time of Jesus' birth a census was taken while Quirinius was governor of Syria. In the last 30 years an archeologist has found a coin with the name Quirinius on it placing him as proconsul of Syria from 11 B.C. until after the death of Herod - confirming Luke's account (Luke 2:1-2).

In the last thirty years archeologists have one after the other, after the other found specific archeological facts validating people in New Testament times. For example, in the gospel of John the Pool of Bethesda (John 5:1-15), the Pool of Siloam (John 9:7), Jacob's Well (John 4:12) and the Stone Pavement near the Jaffa Gate (John 19:13) have all been located.6

TWO: THE WORKS OF JESUS WENT UNCHALLENGED

Stories and miracles; feeding five thousand people, raising people from the dead, lame men walking, blind men seeking, that's pretty far out stuff, did Jesus really do that?

One of the most important things to note is that Jesus' miracles were never disputed by His foes. His number one archenemy, the Jewish establishment, never claimed that His miracles ceased to occur. They attested to the feats Jesus had done, however they attributed His power to Satan (Matthew 12:24). Yet, Jesus disputed their claim immediately, saying, “Any kingdom divided against itself is laid waste; and any city or house divided against itself will not stand. If Satan casts out Satan, he is divided against himself; how then will his kingdom stand?” (Matthew 12:25-26).

They never questioned the validity they only questioned the source; and Jesus knew how to deal with it. Boy, that's powerful! He was making outrageous claims and He backed His statements up with miracles - power over nature, unprecedented teaching, divine insights into people, etc. He healed chronic illnesses in mere seconds, such as blindness and leprosy.

THREE: THE IDENTITY OF JESUS WAS CONFIRMED

The third reason I believe that Jesus rose from the dead is the identity of Jesus was confirmed. Not only do we need to ask did He really exist? Did He do those works? But you have to ask, who did He claim to be? Did Jesus think He was God? Yes, He did, and not only did Jesus believe that He was God, but throughout the New Testament others refer to Him as God.

Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth and the life, no one comes to the Father except through Me” (John 14:6). He also said, “If you've seen Me, you've seen the Father” (John 14:9). It was clear that Jesus knew who He was and He was absolutely comfortable communicating about His deity to others.

FOUR: THE DEATH OF JESUS WAS UNDISPUTED

One of the central arguments used by critics claims that Jesus didn't die. They argue that He was given special herbs and spices and it only appeared as though He had died or that He had faked His death. Theories such as these are just not possible. In The Case for Christ, Lee Strobel interviews Dr. Alexander Metherell on the evidence behind the crucifixion. The details are gory and, at the same time, remarkable. Much of the following information is taken from that interview.

The night before His death, Jesus stayed up all night praying in the garden of Gethsemane. He was under such stress that a medical abnormality caused by a high degree of psychological stress called, hematidrosis occurred - Jesus sweat blood. Luke 22:44 reads, “And, being in agony He was praying very fervently; and His sweat became like drops of blood, falling down upon the ground.”

Flogging involves the use of a whip made of rawhide. In the middle of the rawhide are steel-like balls and at the very end of the rawhide are pieces of bone. The Roman executioners would put them on a pole and when flogging they would swing it so it would wrap around the body. The balls would hit and cause major contusions to the organs and then the pieces of bone would cut into the flesh. As it was pulled away it would rip the flesh right off.

Thirty-nine lashes was the legal limit because few individuals ever lived past thirty-nine lashes. Jesus received all thirty-nine and was within an inch of His life when the Roman guards beat Him with their fists.

He's up all night, He's within an inch of His life, and then He gets beat up. He's in such a weakened condition that He can hardly carry the beam of His own cross, and then He was crucified (Matthew 27).

Crucifixion causes a person to die from suffocation rather than pain. As the criminal's arms were up on the cross the executioners would bend his legs and put a nail between both ankles so that he could push up with his legs and pull himself up, but as he hung his arms would quickly dislocate.

Then tetanus would begin to happen and his arms would start to freeze. The criminal would pull himself up, as his internal organs would begin to slide down. Trying to get a breath compensated the pain of pulling himself up and he would ultimately suffocate.

It has been called historically one of the cruelest forms of torture and death ever devised. If that's not enough, they didn't break Jesus' legs to ensure that He was dead, they instead took a spear and they gashed into His side, and what's interesting is that it says when they gashed His side water and blood came out (John 19:34).

FIVE: THE BURIAL OF JESUS WAS PUBLIC AND SECURED

As the evidence for Jesus' divinity mounts critics try to disprove as many theories as they can. The two most popular stories critics use to invalidate the resurrection are that the disciples went to the wrong tomb and secondly, that the disciples stole the body.

First, let's examine the facts. The tomb belonged to Joseph of Arimathea, a member of the Saint Hedren (the High Counsel), who was a descending vote on the decision to crucify Jesus. He was a high profile wealthy man whose tomb was prominent; people knew where it was. Foremost, the disciples would not have gone to the wrong tomb, because they were the very ones who wrapped Jesus' body for burial and placed Him in the tomb (John 19:38-39).

Additionally, guards were placed at this tomb. Roman Guards were put there because the authorities had heard rumblings about Jesus' teachings and that He claimed He was going to come back from the dead (Matthew 27:63-65). Roman guards knew their job as militia and, if they fell asleep on the job, their lives were at stake. In addition to the guards, the authorities put a seal on the tomb and breaking a Roman seal was an offense punishable by death. This was a very serious, very guarded, 'follow all the right procedures', burial and it has been said that, “never had a criminal given so much worry after his execution. Above all, never had a crucified man had the honour of being guarded by a squad of soldiers”.

His burial is convincing beyond a shadow of the doubt; convincing in that the preponderance of the evidence points to the fact that He was dead and that He rose from the dead. See the question is: are there hard facts, hard facts that you could put in any court of law then or now that really prove and demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt, or is this resurrection just wishful thinking? Let's look at some more evidence.

SIX: THE EVIDENCE FOR HIS RESURRECTION IS CONVINCING

Old Testament prophets predicted both the resurrection and Jesus' entire life - it wasn't new. Hundreds of years prior to these events they were prophesied, predicted if you will. It was predicted that His side would be pierced (Zechariah 12:10, fulfilled John 19:34), His heart broken (Psalms 22:14 fulfilled John 19:34), His bones left unbroken (Psalms 34:20, fulfilled John 19:33) and that He would be buried in a rich man's tomb (Isaiah 53:9, fulfilled Matthew 27:45). These are just a few of over 300 Old Testament predictions that Jesus fulfilled.

Not only that but Jesus predicted openly and numerously that He would die on the cross and rise again three days later (Matthew 16:21, Matthew 17:9, Matthew 17:22-23, Matthew 20:18-19, Mark 9:10, John 2:18-22, Luke 9:22-27). It was public, it was known. Jesus made this claim and held onto His intentions.

He also appeared twelve different times to well over five hundred witnesses after He rose from the dead. He appeared to Mary Magdalene (John 20:14), the women returning from the tomb (Matthew 28:9-10), Peter (Luke 24:34), the Emmaus disciples (Luke 24:13-33), the apostles (John 20:26-29), James (1 Corinthians 15:7), and to the group of 500 believers on a Galilean mountain (1 Corinthians 15:6) just to name a few.

SEVEN: WHAT'S IT ALL MEAN?

The resurrection is a historical fact, verifiable in the same manner and by the same means that we verify any other historical fact. There's as much substantiated evidence and history and confirmation that Jesus is all He said He was, did all He said He did, and rose from the dead, as there is of any man who was president twenty years ago.

The implications of this history are threefold. One, it validates Jesus' claim; ?I am the way, the truth and the life. (John 14:6). Second, it gives absolute hope for the future in that we have freedom here on earth (Romans 6:7-8). Third, Jesus died, He rose again, He is at the right hand of the Father and He has prepared a place for every single person who would look at the evidence and, by faith, receive the gift of eternal life (John 3:16).

John 3:16-17 says, “For God so loved the world,” (that means you), “that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. For God did not send His Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him.”

___________

List of Recommended Books:

The Case for Christ, Lee Strobel

The Case for Faith, Lee Strobel

Evidence That Demands a Verdict, Josh McDowell

Jesus Among Other Gods, Ravi Zacharias

Letters From a Skeptic, Gregory A. Boyd

Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis

More Than a Carpenter, Josh McDowell

The Screwtape Letters, C.S. Lewis

Excerpted from Why I Believe, a booklet by Chip Ingram; based on the series Why I Believe. Copyright 2004 by Chip Ingram. All rights reserved.

Chip Ingram is President of Walk Thru the Bible in Atlanta, GA, and Teaching Pastor of Living on the Edge, a national radio ministry.

*

from email submitted by Rick Swenson, Hopatcong, New Jersey · Chip Ingram via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database easterresurrection

The True Meaning of the Cross

John 19:17

If the death of Christ on the cross is the true meaning of the Incarnation, then there is no gospel without the cross. Christmas by itself is no gospel. The life of Christ is no gospel. Even the resurrection, important as it is in the total scheme of things, is no gospel by itself. For the good news is not just that God became man, nor that God has spoken to reveal a proper way of life for us, or even that death, the great enemy, is conquered. Rather, the good news is that sin has been dealt with (of which the resurrection is a proof); that Jesus has suffered its penalty for us as our representative, so that we might never have to suffer it; and that therefore all who believe in him can look forward to heaven.

...Emulation of Christ's life and teaching is possible only to those who enter into a new relationship with God through faith in Jesus as their substitute. The resurrection is not merely a victory over death (though it is that) but a proof that the atonement was a satisfactory atonement in the sight of the Father (Rom 4:25); and that death, the result of sin, is abolished on that basis.

Any gospel that talks merely of the Christ-event, meaning the Incarnation without the atonement, is a false gospel. Any gospel that talks about the love of God without pointing out that his love led him to pay the ultimate price for sin in the person of his Son on the cross is a false gospel. The only true gospel is of the one mediator (1 Tim. 2:5-6), who gave himself for us.

Finally, just as there can be no gospel without the atonement as the reason for the Incarnation, so also there can be no Christian life without it. Without the atonement the Incarnation theme easily becomes a kind of deification of the human and leads to arrogance and self-advancement. With the atonement the true message of the life of Christ, and therefore also of the life of the Christian man or woman, is humility and self-sacrifice for the obvious needs of others.

The Christian life is not indifference to those who are hungry or sick or suffering from some other lack. It is not contentment with our own abundance, neither the abundance of middle class living with home and cars and clothes and vacations, nor the abundance of education or even the spiritual abundance of good churches, Bibles, Bible teaching or Christian friends and acquaintances. Rather, it is the awareness that others lack these things and that we must therefore sacrifice many of our own interests in order to identify with them and thus bring them increasingly into the abundance we enjoy.

We will live for Christ fully only when we are willing to be impoverished, if necessary, in order that others might be helped.

__________

James Montgomery Boice, “Foundations of the Christian Faith”

from Internet · James Montgomery Boice via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrection

Suffering and the Hope of Healing -- Part 2

John 11:25

Come with me to the scene. A tomb sealed quietly in Bethany near Jerusalem, pronouncing the finality of death, the victory of corruption over the body of a man. Two sisters weep, Mary and Martha, surrounded by professional mourners. On the outskirts of town, Jesus finally arrives with his band of men. The sisters come to Jesus and blame him for not coming sooner. They knew He had the power to heal. Why didn't he come and heal? He had healed many strangers. Why didn't he come heal a friend?

Jesus, composed and determined, said, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believers in Me will live, even though he dies; and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?” Martha's reply reveals that she did not understand his power or purpose, but she did know he was trustworthy: “I believe that You are the Christ, the Son of God, who was to come into the world.”

Then Jesus weeps with them. Ravi Zacharias notes that Jesus, having power to raise the dead, weeps with those who do not have that power. We do not have a high priest who cannot identify with our deepest sense of loss.

After the command was given to roll away the stone, Jesus prays aloud to his Father for all to hear and then utters the command that threw the world into gasping silence, “Lazarus, come forth!” And he came forth.

Suddenly the incredible power of death which paralyzed the world was broken. Death, though it had uttered volumes to silence the lives of scores of humans, did not have the last word. Another Word was spoken.

It is sad to see that, as this Word was spoken to penetrate the power of death, many began to plot to erase that Word. Philip Yancey points out this was the last miracle Jesus did.

But Lazarus would die again on another day. The Scripture is silent on the second physical death of Lazarus. But we can be assured that Lazarus, though the focal point of so much awe and scrutiny, was again laid in that tomb. The physical miracles of Jesus were always temporary ones. And the loss of a brother would come again to the hearts of the women.

Death's final word can only be overshadowed by a permanent resurrection! Lazarus' resurrection was not enough. The ultimate fulcrum of suffering and healing resides in Jesus Christ, who identified with our suffering by taking our sin and sorrow upon his shoulders at the Cross, and then burst forth in his resurrection to ensure a permanent hope for you and me.

The suffering of losing those we love lingers for a long time, even when we have everlasting hope. Gerald L. Sittser, who lost three generations of his family in one automobile accident, writes in his thoughtful and helpful book, A Grace Disguised, “Suffering engenders a certain degree of ambivalence in those of us who believe in the resurrection. We feel the pain of our present circumstance, which reminds us of what we have lost; yet we hope for future release and victory. We doubt, yet try to believe; we suffer, yet long for real healing; we inch hesitantly toward death, yet see death as the door to resurrection.... Living with this ambivalence is both difficult and vital. It stretches our souls, challenging us to acknowledge our morality and yet to continue to hope for final victory — the victory Jesus won for us in his death and resurrection, a victory that awaits us only on the other side of the grave.”

Though all people die, not all people will really live. Sittser writes, “The last chapter of the human story is not death but life. Jesus' resurrection guarantees it.” That is, for all who are willing to be part of his unquenchable hope and his never-ending story. This hope holds all of our sorrows in tension as we await our own permanent resurrection. Jesus Christ will utter, once and for all, “Come forth!”

__________

Copyright © 2003 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

When Summer Comes True

Ecclesiastes 3:1

All that is found in the promises of summer has long been a theme on the lips of poets and songwriters. Poet or not, I imagine we have all agreed with Shakespeare that, “summer's lease hath all too short a date.”

It is the time of year when we savor the days of summer, and recall what it felt like to run home from the last day of school with three months in our back pocket. For me summer vacations call to mind the shores of Lake Michigan, a picturesque reminder of the origins of the word “vacation” itself; “vacation” comes from the Latin word “vacatio” which means “freedom.”

Nonetheless, even as children on summer break, we are all sadly aware that it is a freedom that does not last. In truth, that a vacation ends, that the summer fades away, is perhaps a detail that makes them more sought-after; it is time set aside, time that shouts all the more of meaning because of the other moments with which it so contrasts. And yet there is a promise within the freeing days of summer that captures our hearts and remains with us through the longest of winters.

A poem by C.S. Lewis suggests that the promise we look for is that the cycles will one day come to a grinding halt and death will be no more. It is the hopeful possibility that we were created to know a freedom that endures. Writes Lewis,

I heard in Addison's Walk a bird sing clear

'This year the summer will come true. This year. This year.

'Winds will not strip the blossom from the apple trees

This year, nor want of rain destroy the peas.

'This year time's nature will no more defeat you,

Nor all the promised moments in their passing cheat you.

'This time they will not lead you round and back

To Autumn, one year older, by the well-worn track.

'This year, this year, as all these flowers foretell,

We shall escape the circle and undo the spell.

'Often deceived, yet open once again your heart,

Quick, quick, quick, quick! — the gates are drawn apart.’[1]

In the changing seasons, the fading of flowers, and the dying of summer are signposts of the eternal. In his wisdom King Solomon saw that written upon the seasons of time is the signature of the One who made them. “There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under heaven: a time to be born and a time to die, a time to plant and a time to uproot... He has made everything beautiful in its time. He has also set eternity in the hearts of men.” Rising sun and emerging summer declare that the heavens will not forget nor forsake; upon each budding flower is written the promise of resurrection.

That God has stopped the cycle of death with the Cross of his son is the hope on which the Christian stands, that Christ is coming back to bring us where he is is the weighted promise we carry through the seasons. The effect of such a promise upon the life of a disciple was perhaps put into words best by hymnist Fanny Crosby. She wrote,

I know in Whom my soul believes,

I know in Whom I trust;

The Holy One, the merciful,

The only wise and just.

I know in Whom my soul believes,

And all my fears depart;

For though the winter winds may blow,

'Tis summer in my heart.

This prolific hymnist wrote of Christian hope as clearly and profoundly as she saw it written upon her life. Blinded as an infant by a doctor's error, she sang her life in darkness but radiated the light of Christ, ever carrying the promise of summer in her heart.

Knowing in Whom our souls believe, let us walk through every season with the light of Christ and the promise of resurrection. There will be a day when summer will come true.

__________

1. “What the Bird Said Early in the Year,” Poems, (Harcourt: San Diego, 1992), p. 71.

__________

Copyright © 2004 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

==========================

Version from July 7, 2006:

All that is found in the promises of summer has long been a theme on the lips of poets and songwriters. Poet or otherwise, I imagine we have all agreed at some point with Shakespeare: “summer's lease hath all too short a date.”

It is the time of year when we savor the days of summer, and recall what it felt like to run home from the last day of school with three months in our back pocket. For me summer vacations call to mind the shores of Lake Michigan, a scenic reminder of the origin of the word “vacation” itself; the Latin word “vacatio” means FREEDOM.

Even so, we are sadly aware it is a freedom that does not last. Even as children on summer break we knew that vacation would end and summer would fade away. It is, in fact, this quality that makes vacations all the more sought-after; it is time set aside, time that shouts particularly of meaning because of the time with which it so contrasts. Yet regardless of its short lease, there seems a promise within the freeing days of summer that captures our hearts and remains with us through the longest of winters.

A poem by C.S. Lewis suggests that the promise we look for is that the seasons of life will one day come to a grinding halt and death will be no more. It is the hopeful possibility that we were created to know a freedom that endures. Writes Lewis:

I heard in Addison's Walk a bird sing clear

'This year the summer will come true. This year. This year.

'Winds will not strip the blossom from the apple trees

This year, nor want of rain destroy the peas.

'This year time's nature will no more defeat you,

Nor all the promised moments in their passing cheat you.

'This time they will not lead you round and back

To Autumn, one year older, by the well-worn track.

'This year, this year, as all these flowers foretell,

We shall escape the circle and undo the spell.

'Often deceived, yet open once again your heart,

Quick, quick, quick, quick! — the gates are drawn apart.'(1)

What if the changing seasons, the fading of flowers, and the rebirth of summer are signposts of the eternal? In his wisdom King Solomon saw that written upon the seasons of time is the signature of the one who made them. “There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under heaven: a time to be born and a time to die, a time to plant and a time to uproot... He has made everything beautiful in its time. He has also set eternity in the hearts of men” (Ecclesiastes 3:1-2,11). Rising sun and emerging summer declare that the heavens will neither forget nor forsake. Upon each waking flower is written the promise of resurrection.

It is this weighted promise we carry through the seasons: Christ has stopped the cycle of death and is coming back to bring us where he is. The effect of such a promise on the life of a disciple is well illustrated in hymnist Fanny Crosby. She wrote:

I know in whom my soul believes,

I know in whom I trust;

The Holy One, the merciful,

the only wise and just.

I know in whom my soul believes,

and all my fears depart;

For though the winter winds may blow,

'tis summer in my heart.

Crosby wrote of the Christian hope she saw written across her life. Though blinded as an infant by a doctor's error, she radiated the light of Christ, ever carrying the promise of summer in her heart. Knowing in whom our souls believe, let us walk likewise through every season, holding near the hope of Christ and the promise of resurrection. For there will be a day when summer comes true.

________

1. C.S. Lewis, "What the Bird Said Early in the Year," Poems, (Harcourt: San Diego, 1992), 71.

________

Copyright © 2006 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

[Original illustration here was a duplicate in HolwickID 25837-26027]

The Tomb Is Still Empty

John 19:42

In 1985 I had my first opportunity to visit Israel and personally view the land where Jesus lived. Among the many wonders to be seen, I anticipated that my visit to the site of Jesus' crucifixion and burial would be the highlight of my trip. The day we journeyed toward the location, I was somber and thoughtful. In my mind, I recalled the visual images of Hollywood films I had seen which depicted Christ's death - three crosses high atop a hill against the background of angry clouds and thunder. Deep in thought and meditating on the words of the old hymn, "The Old Rugged Cross," the tour bus arrived at the destination just north of the Damascus Gate, outside the walled city of Jerusalem. Through the PA speaker, the tour guide announced proudly, "Here we are! To your right is the site where it is believed that Jesus was crucified." As I looked out the window, surely there had to be a mistake. I could hardly believe it. It was a bus station with acres of paved asphalt! It seemed impossible that the site of the most sacred event in history could be obscured and defiled by such a thing. Once I gained my composure, I looked beyond and saw the vague image a skull, a natural formation in the nearby rocky cliffs. It was obvious, this indeed had to be Golgotha - the place of the skull. Although the jagged skull in the rugged hillside should have been a strong clue for researchers, the site only gained its credibility as the genuine, historic Golgotha, a few decades ago. Before that, another site was considered the traditional location, although it lacked many authenticating characteristics. The site of Jesus' tomb was well known to the post apostolic church, and was described in writings as late as the fourth century. In 333, a pilgrim from Bordeaux, France wrote, "As you pass through the gate of Neapolis [the present Damascus gate]... on your left is the hillock Golgotha where the Lord was crucified, and about a stone's throw from it to the vault where they laid his body and he rose again on the third day."1 The location of the skull hill corresponded precisely with the description of the ancient writer. In addition, some years ago archeologists discovered that the bus station at the foot of the hill was built on top of what had been an ancient stone quarry. Diggings showed that this had probably been the Jew's traditional place of execution, which was carried out by stoning. The Romans crucified Jesus (a Roman method of execution) at the place where Jews usually carried out their own method of capital punishment. The great evidence that brought convincing authenticity to the mentioned site was the discovery of the nearby garden tomb not more than 100 yards away, excavated from a hillside in 1867. The famous British General, Charles Gordon, was the first to suspect the tomb as Christ's, during his inspection of the site in 1882. Other researchers and scholars later concurred with his speculations.² The Gospel of John described that Jesus' tomb was in a garden near the crucifixion site (John 19:42) and belonged to a wealthy disciple, Joseph of Arimathaea. He and Nicodemus took Jesus' body, prepared and placed Him in the tomb. According to scripture, the tomb of Jesus was the site of His resurrection - the greatest event in history and the single most important doctrine of the Christian church. Upon it hinges the entirety of the claims that Jesus made, including the eternal salvation of His followers (1 Cor. 15:13-14). As I first approached the tomb, it first appeared only as a jagged crevice in the side of a hill. But closer examination showed that it was a man-hewn cavern - a classic example of a first century tomb prepared for a prominent person. Before entering inside, I noticed the obvious indentation of a rut hewn in the rock beneath the opening. Archaeologists explain that this was a type of "track" used to guide the huge, wheel-shaped stone that sealed the entrance. Entering the tomb was an extraordinary experience. There inside the dual chambers, which probably measured about 8' x 15', I viewed a stone-carved pedestal on which a body would be laid. Then as I looked about the cavern in the dim light, I noticed that in one upper corner there was a carved symbol - it was the first letter of the Greek alphabet, Alpha, and in the opposite corner was Omega, the last alphabetic letter. The meaning could not be clearer. The "Alpha and the Omega" was a reference that Jesus made to Himself (Rev. 22:13), and it was apparent that the tomb was marked in such a way to show that it was where Jesus once laid. For a considerable time I stood alone in the tomb, trembling and praying. It was an awe inspiring experience. I became profoundly aware that I was standing at the site of the greatest miracle ever known to mankind - the intersection of God's love to the human race. This was where Jesus' broken body laid and where His resurrection life burst forth! I felt humbled and unworthy to stand on the same stone floor where Jesus' holy feet stood and walked. Finally, it was time to go. But as I stepped to the opening to exit, I paused and looked back momentarily, reflecting on the impact of this incredible pilgrimage. I grinned and thought to myself, "Nobody was home here!" Buddha, Mohammed, Confucius can be found in their tombs, but my Lord's grave is still empty. Jesus, our risen Savior, is alive and well! (1) "Egeria's Travels" (2) "The Search For The Tomb Of Jesus," William Stewart McBirnie

from www.victorious.org · Dr. Dale A. Robbins via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Other Resurrection Appearances

Luke 24:43

Luke 24:43–49, Acts 1:3 — Other Resurrection Appearances « Leader information shown in this fashion »

A. Today we mainly look at John in order to fill in the picture of the resurrection appearances of our Lord Jesus Christ from the other gospels — in chronological order as best we can.

1. Last week we completed looking at the Passion week with Christ meeting His disciples and when they had given Him a piece of broiled fish, we read that “… He took it and ate in their presence.” (Luke 24:43 NKJV).

2. with Paul’s commentary in 1 Corinthians 15:5 (NKJV): and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve.

3. Now we enter the period described in Acts 1:2b–3 (NKJV): … the apostles whom He had chosen, to whom He also presented Himself alive after His suffering by many infallible proofs, being seen by them during forty days and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God.

B. To the “Twelve” next Sunday, John 20:26–31

1. Belief, John 20:26-29(NKJV): 26 And after eight days His disciples were again inside, and Thomas with them. Jesus came, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, “Peace to you!” 27 Then He said to Thomas, “Reach your finger here, and look at My hands; and reach your hand here, and put it into My side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing.” 28 And Thomas answered and said to Him, “My Lord and my God!” 29 Jesus said to him, “Thomas, because you have seen Me, you have believed. Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”

a. what lesson is there to learn from Thomas? « — don’t miss the meeting with believers on Sunday! Note that Thomas is said to have evangelized India; churches there named after him »

b. who are more to be envied (happier, blessed) than Thomas? « — those who coming after will believe on lesser evidence »

c. why (Hebrews 11:1, 8; Galatians 3:9) « — they give evidence of the same kind of faith that Abraham had »

2. Gospel Closing, John 20:30–31 (NKJV): 30 And truly Jesus did many other signs in the presence of His disciples, which are not written in this book; 31 but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name.

a. what are purposes of signs? « – bring faith, bring eternal life »

C. To the Seven by Galilee, John 21

1. A Beach Fish-fry, John 21:1–14 (NKJV): 1 After these things Jesus showed Himself again to the disciples at the Sea of Tiberias, and in this way He showed Himself: 2 Simon Peter, Thomas called the Twin, Nathanael of Cana in Galilee, the sons of Zebedee, and two others of His disciples were together. 3 Simon Peter said to them, “I am going fishing.” They said to him, “We are going with you also.” They went out and immediately got into the boat, and that night they caught nothing. 4 But when the morning had now come, Jesus stood on the shore; yet the disciples did not know that it was Jesus. 5 Then Jesus said to them, “Children, have you any food?” They answered Him, “No.” 6 And He said to them, “Cast the net on the right side of the boat, and you will find some.” So they cast, and now they were not able to draw it in because of the multitude of fish. 7 Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved said to Peter, “It is the Lord!” Now when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he put on his outer garment (for he had removed it), and plunged into the sea. 8 But the other disciples came in the little boat (for they were not far from land, but about two hundred cubits), dragging the net with fish. 9 Then, as soon as they had come to land, they saw a fire of coals {of charcoal} there, and fish laid on it, and bread. 10 Jesus said to them, “Bring some of the fish which you have just caught.” 11 Simon Peter went up {or, aboard} and dragged the net to land, full of large fish, one hundred and fifty-three; and although there were so many, the net was not broken. 12 Jesus said to them, “Come and eat breakfast.” Yet none of the disciples dared ask Him, “Who are You?” — knowing that it was the Lord. 13 Jesus then came and took the bread and gave it to them, and likewise the fish. 14 This is now the third time Jesus showed Himself to His disciples after He was raised from the dead.

a. Why do disciples “go fishing?” « — (1) it is hard to wait upon the Lord; (2) we like to return to our “comfort zone” »

b. Compare characters of Peter & John (also see John 20:3-9) « — both impulsive and perceptive; Peter more impulsive, John more perceptive »

c. what role does Jesus adopt in this incident? « — shepherd, feeding his flock (literally); provider of sustenance to them »

2. The Charge to Peter, John 21:15–19 (NKJV): 15 So when they had eaten breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, “Simon, son of Jonah, do you love A Me more than these?” He said to Him, “Yes, Lord; You know that I love B You.” He said to him, “Feed My lambs.” 16 He said to him again a second time, “Simon, son of Jonah, do you love A Me?” He said to Him, “Yes, Lord; You know that I love B You.” He said to him, “Tend {shepherd or pastor} My sheep.” 17 He said to him the third time, “Simon, son of Jonah, do you love B Me?” Peter was grieved because He said to him the third time, “Do you love B Me?” And he said to Him, “Lord, You know all things; You know that I love B You.” Jesus said to him, “Feed My sheep. 18 Most assuredly, I say to you, when you were younger, you girded yourself and walked where you wished; but when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will gird you and carry you where you do not wish.” 19 This He spoke, signifying by what death he would glorify God. And when He had spoken this, He said to him, “Follow Me.”

a. “more than these” … what are the these? « (1) than the other disciples love Jesus (cf., Mark 14:29); (2) than he loves these other men, his comrades; OR, (3) than his fishing and work »

b. the two words

(A) A. agapaw – love, devoted, sold out to (1 Corinthians 13, 1 John 3:18) « –”charity” was not such a bad translation since it is love that is shown in action, not just words »

(B) B. filew – tenderly love, be kindly affectioned « – the love of friendship »

c. what commands did Jesus give Peter? « — feed, tend, follow »

d. what office did Jesus bestow upon Peter? « — that of caring for those believing in Jesus … not authority, but responsibility »

e. what does he foretell of Peter? « — his death by crucifixion »

f. how is the context significant to these? « — Jesus an example »

3. Word to John, John 21:20–23 (NKJV): 20 Then Peter, turning around, saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following, who also had leaned on His breast at the supper, and said, “Lord, who is the one who betrays You?” 21 Peter, seeing him, said to Jesus, “But Lord, what about this man?” 22 Jesus said to him, “If I will that he remain till I come, what is that to you? You follow Me.” 23 Then this saying went out among the brethren that this disciple would not die. Yet Jesus did not say to him that he would not die, but, “If I will that he remain till I come, what is that to you?”

a. Peter’s concern

(A) was « — what would happen to John? »

(B) should be « — his following of Jesus Christ »

4. John Closes the Epilogue, John 20:24–25 (NKJV): 24 This is the disciple who testifies of these things, and wrote these things; and we know that his testimony is true. 25 And there are also many other things that Jesus did, which if they were written one by one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that would be written. Amen.

a. in what sense is this an exaggeration? … literally true? « — books could record a single human life fully; but not all the eternal ramifications of Jesus’ deeds, particularly His saving of men and women of all ages »

D. Some snatches of verses about these days — we will return to some of these next week to pick up the theme of the commissions of Christ to his followers – these we will pass over lightly today

1. Paul’s commentary, 1 Corinthians 15:6 (NKJV): After that He was seen by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep.

2. The Appearance on the Mountain in Galilee, Matthew 28:16–18a (NKJV): 16 Then the eleven disciples went away into Galilee, to the mountain which Jesus had appointed for them.17 When they saw Him, they worshipped Him; but some doubted. 18 And Jesus came and spoke to them, … This fulfilled instructions, apparently given before His death, as detailed in the angel’s words to the women in Mark 16:7 (NKJV): “But go, tell His disciples — and Peter — that He is going before you into Galilee; there you will see Him, as He said to you.” There is no reason to limit this to the eleven and may be when the five hundred saw Jesus at one time as Paul comments.

3. Paul’s commentary, 1 Corinthians 15:7 (NKJV): After that He was seen by James, then by all the apostles.

4. The Instruction of the Disciples, Luke 24:44–49 (NKJV): 44 Then He said to them, “These are the words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that all things must be fulfilled which were written in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms concerning Me.” 45 And He opened their understanding, that they might comprehend the Scriptures. 46 Then He said to them, “Thus it is written, and thus it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day, 47 and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. 48 And you are witnesses of these things. 49 Behold, I send the Promise of My Father upon you; but tarry in the city of Jerusalem until you are endued with power from on high.”

a. Bible scholars point to Hosea 6:2 as referenced here; discuss. « — the prophet speaks about Israel; Messiah alone was the faithful One of Israel, then He bore sin and punishment, and after 2 days, ie., on the third day, God raised Him up »

from Sunday Bible School · Garth Hutchinson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database doubt

Setting A Horizon To Faith

Mark 5:35

Thy daughter is dead: why troublest thou the Master any further? — Mark 5:35.

These servants could understand troubling the Master to come to sickness, but not to death. The greatest trouble of all, they thought, was beyond His reach. It did mean trouble to Him to come to bear our infirmities and heal our sicknesses, but He did not stop there. Death was our worst enemy and our greatest affliction. It meant the greatest trouble of all for Him to come to us here, but He did it. He endured “even the death of the cross” the greatest trouble and there He met our deepest need. Never think of His love or power stopping short of our greatest trouble. It meant the cross to Him, but He did not stop short of death even the death of the cross. — L. Sheldrake,

When blood from a victim must flow,

this Shepherd by pity was led

To stand between us and the foe,

and willingly died in our stead.

from Old Devotional Calendar (1960's) · L. Sheldrake via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database healingresurrection

The Cornerstone of Christianity

Mark 16:2

Very early in the morning the first day of the week, they came unto the sepulchre. — Mark 16:2.

The greatest morning in all the history of the world was that in which our Lord rose again from the dead. The resurrection of Christ has been well called “The Cornerstone of Christianity.” All the mighty purposes of God are dependent upon the resurrection of Christ, as are also all the blessings of the Christian, now, and for eternity. When we think of Calvary, we remember the deep, nightlike darkness through which our blessed Redeemer passed “from the sixth hour till the ninth,” as He poured out His soul unto death. The mighty sacrifice was offered, but did it meet on our behalf all the righteous demands of the law and the holy claims of God? The resurrection proves the perfect acceptability to God of that finished work. Very early in the morning Christ arose. Hallelujah, Christ arose. He ascended to the right hand of the Majesty on high — a living glorified man on the Throne. — A. W. Joyce.

Come ye who bow to sovereign grace, record Emmanuel’s love;

Join in a song of grateful praise to Him who lives above.

Once in the gloomy grave He lay, but, by His rising power,

He tore the gates of death away, Hail; mighty Conqueror. — C. H. S.

from Old Devotional Calendar (1960's) · A. W. Joyce via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Professor Calculates Odds of Resurrection

Luke 24:1

In April 2002, the well-respected Oxford University philosophy professor Richard Swineburne used a broadly accepted probability theory to defend the truth of Christ's resurrection. He did this at a high-profile gathering of philosophy professors at Yale University.

In a New York Times interview, Swineburne said, “For someone dead for 36 hours to come to life again is, according to the laws of nature, extremely improbable. But if there is a God of the traditional kind, natural laws only operate because he makes them operate.” Swineburne used the Bayes Theorem to assign values to things like the probability that God is real, Jesus' behavior during his lifetime, and the quality of witness testimony after his death. Then he plugged the numbers into a probability formula and added everything up.

The result: a 97 percent probability that the resurrection really happened.

__________

Source: Group magazine (July 2002); submitted by Van Morris, Mount Washington, Kentucky

from Leadership Journal, www.christianitytoday.com, "to Illustrate" · Van Morris via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database easterresurrection

Don't Forget the Resurrection!

1 Corinthians 15:16

In 1874, a Baptist minister named Robert Lowry penned one of the most stirring hymns to ever exalt the resurrection of Jesus Christ -- “Low in the Grave He Lay.” Notice how these verses contrast the impotence of death and suffering with the resurrection power of Christ:

Low in the grave He lay, Jesus my Savior;

Waiting the coming day, Jesus my Lord!

Vainly they watch His bed, Jesus my Savior;

Vainly they seal the dead, Jesus my Lord!

Death cannot keep its Prey, Jesus my Savior;

He tore the bars away, Jesus my Lord!

Death, man’s most dread enemy, is powerless to reign over the Lord of life. And that truth has significance for you and me, here and now in the twenty-first century. You can see it in the most exciting and rousing part of Lowry’s hymn, the refrain that punctuates each stanza:

Up from the grave He arose,

With a mighty triumph o’er His foes,

He arose a Victor from the dark domain,

And He lives forever, with His saints to reign.

He arose! He arose!

Hallelujah! Christ arose!

Do you see in those lines what Jesus’ resurrection means to you? If you are a Christian, you can rejoice in the fact that Christ rose from the dead as a victor, a champion who lives forever to reign, “with His saints.” That refers to the promise based on our spiritual baptism into the death and resurrection of Christ -- it is our hope and the reason and ground of all we believe.

But what if there were no resurrection? What if the resurrection of Jesus Christ is just a first-century myth to be ignored or marginalized as a secondary issue? The implications of that approach are devastating to Christianity.

I want to draw your attention to what Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 15:16-19 so that you can see what happens when you forget the resurrection.

For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised; and if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If we have hoped in Christ in this life only, we are of all men most to be pitied.

Without question, if Jesus is still in the grave, if He is perpetually the sufferer and never the Victor, then you and I are hopelessly lost. And though that is not the case, I want to focus on the hypothetical “what if” that Paul assumes temporarily in 1 Corinthians 15. “What if the resurrection were a myth? What if Jesus Christ were still dead and in the grave?”

First of all, you would still be in your sins, under the tyranny of death along with the most vile and unbelieving pagan. If Jesus did not rise from the dead, then sin won the victory over Him and continues to be victorious over you too. If Jesus remained in the grave, then, when you die you would also stay dead. Furthermore, since “the wages of sin is death” (Romans 6:23), were you to remain dead, death and eternal punishment would be your future.

The purpose of trusting in Christ is for forgiveness of sins, because it is from sin that we need to be saved. “Christ died for our sins” and “was buried, and ... raised on the third day” (1 Corinthians 15:3-4). If Christ was not raised, His death was in vain, your faith in Him would be pointless, and your sins would still be counted against you with no hope of spiritual life.

Second, if there is no resurrection, then “those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished.” That means every Old Testament saint, every New Testament saint, and every saint since Paul wrote would be suffering in torment at this very moment. That would include Paul himself, the rest of the apostles, Augustine, Luther, Calvin, Wesley, Moody, and the faithful and prayerful saints you’ve known -- every other believer in every age also would be in hell. Their faith would have been in vain, their sins would not have been forgiven, and their destiny would be damnation.

In light of the other consequences, the last is rather obvious. “If we have hoped in Christ in this life only, we are of all men most to be pitied.” Without Christ’s resurrection, and the salvation and blessings it brings, Christianity would be pointless and pitiable. Without the resurrection we would have no Savior, no forgiveness, no gospel, no meaningful faith, no life, and we could never have hope for any of those things.

To have hoped in Christ alone in this life would be to teach, preach, suffer, sacrifice, and work entirely for nothing. If Christ is still dead, then He not only has no ability to save you in the future, but He can’t help you now either. If He were not alive, where would be your source of peace, joy, or satisfaction now? The Christian life would be a mockery, a charade, a tragic and cruel joke. Christians who suffer and even die for the faith would be just as blind and pathetic as those “believers” who followed Jim Jones and the People’s Temple, David Koresh and the Branch Davidians, and Marshall Applewhite and the Heaven’s Gate cult.

Since a Christian has no Savior but Christ, no Redeemer but Christ, and no Lord but Christ, if Christ is not raised, He is not alive, and our Christian life is lifeless. We would have nothing to justify our faith, our Bible study, our preaching or witnessing, our service for Him or our worship of Him, and nothing to justify our hope in this life or the next. We would deserve nothing but the compassion reserved for fools.

But, God did raise “Jesus our Lord from the dead, He who was delivered up because of our transgressions, and was raised because of our justification” (Romans 4:24-25). Because Christ lives, we too shall live (John 14:19). “The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom you had put to death by hanging Him on a cross. He is the one whom God exalted to His right hand as a Prince and a Savior, to grant repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins” (Acts 5:30-31).

We are NOT to be pitied, for Paul immediately ends the dreadful “what if” section by saying, “But now Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who are asleep” (1 Corinthians 15:20). As Paul said at the end of his life, “I know whom I have believed and I am convinced that He is able to guard what I have entrusted to Him [i.e. his life] until that day” (2 Timothy 1:12).

Those who do not hope in Christ alone for salvation are the real fools; they are the ones who need to hear your compassionate testimony about the triumph of Christ’s resurrection. So don’t forget the resurrection; rejoice in it and glory in it, for He is risen indeed.

from Source not recorded · Rev. John MacArthur via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database easter

The Message of the Resurrection

What must it have felt like for the disciples when Jesus died? They had left everything for this man, followed Him for three years, and built all their hopes and dreams on His ideas.

Not only that, but they had heard all the incredible things He said. He told them that He "was" even before Abraham lived. He said that He and the Father were one. He declared He was the only way to God. He had told them such amazing things, but now there He was, hanging on a cross, dead. How could this be?

The disciples were confused, scared, mournful, and completely distraught. Only one thing could have turned them around. Only one thing could have breathed new life into their downtrodden spirits. Praise God, that one vital thing came in the cry of an excited friend running toward them, shouting, "He's alive! He's alive!" Jesus had beaten death.

Believers oftentimes take this news for granted. It seems so commonplace today to speak of the Resurrection of Jesus. Our familiarity, however, must never lessen the impact of the declaration, "He's alive!" For mankind, death had always been the final word, the inescapable end. By achieving victory over death, Jesus proved He was who He claimed to be. By demonstrating His power over man's greatest fear, He showed Himself to be mankind's greatest friend, Savior, and Lord.

Does your heart leap when you hear the proclamation of the living Lord? Take the clouded church lenses from your eyes and see the story fresh and new: Jesus is alive!

from In Touch via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Rise Again

Luke 22:42

Go ahead – drive the nails in My hands,

Laugh at Me where I stand;

Go ahead and say it isn’t Me–

The day will come when you will see!

’Cause I’ll rise again–

There’s no pow’r on earth can tie me down!

Yes, I’ll rise again–

Death can’t keep me in the ground!

Go ahead and mock My name’

My love for you is still the same;

Go ahead and bury Me–

But very soon I wil be free!

’Cause I’ll rise again–

There’s no pow’r on earth can tie me down!

Yes, I’ll rise again–

Death can’t keep me in the ground!

Go ahead and say I’m dead and gone–

But you will see that you were wrong;

Go ahead and try to hide the Son–

But all will see that I’m the one!

’Cause I’ll come again–

There’s no pow’r on earth can keep me back!

Yes, I’ll come again–

Come to take My people back!

from Praise! (singspiration Music) · Dallas Holm (1948- ) © 1977 by Dimension Music via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrectionsecond coming

Resurrection

John 11:25

“We believe that Jesus died and that he rose again. So, because of him, God will raise with Jesus those who have died.” — 1 Thessalonians 4:14

The fire that lit the boiler of the New Testament church was an unquenchable belief that if Jesus had been only a man, he would have stayed in the tomb. The earliest Christians couldn’t stay silent about the fact that the one they saw hung on a cross walked again on the earth and appeared to five hundred people.

Let us ask our Father humbly, yet confidently in the name of Jesus, to remind us of the empty tomb. Let us see the victorious Jesus: the conqueror of the tomb, the one who defied death. And let us be reminded that we, too, will be granted that same victory!

Lord, thank you for the sweet surprise of Easter morning. We are thankful that when you arose from your sleep of death, you didn’t go immediately to heaven, but instead you went and visited people. The visit of love reminds us that it was for people that you died.

from Source not recorded · Max Lucado via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Praise In the Church

Psalms 22:22

Psalm 22:22, 25, 27, 31 (NAS) Praise in the Church

A. This Psalm seems originally to have described the sufferings of David as he fled from place to place from the persecution of Saul. But this 22nd Psalm is also one of the Messianic Psalms, a prophecy of the humiliation and suffering of the Lord Jesus upon the cross. After the graphic description of Christ’s death, just as resurrection follows the cross, we come across expressions of praise, the praise which God’s people, the church, can give as a result of His death.

B. 22 I will tell of Thy name to my brethren; In the midst of the assembly I will praise Thee.

1. this is one of the first things fulfilled after the resurrection; look at John 20:17, and bit by bit, mourning turned to praise

2. this started first with the assembly of 2 or 3, then of the disciples, then of 500 at one time (1 Corinthians 15:1ff)

C. 25 From Thee comes my praise in the great assembly; I shall pay my vows before those who fear Him.

1. but after this, and for all time, comes praise in the great congregation, of the church universal; and whence is the source of this praise? … from God Himself

2. but is this its full extent? … well, look at Acts 2:33, 5:31, Philippians 2:9 — this assembly includes men and angels

3. and on behalf of those who fear God, Jesus, now exalted will continue “paying His vows” — carrying out the will of the Father as planned in the councils of eternity

D. 27 All the ends of the earth will remember and turn to the LORD, And all the families of the nations will worship before Thee.

1. is there a limit to the praise that results from His work?

2. is there a limit to where the message will have power?

3. from the few, the favoured, the five hundred, the message was to spread, has spread, will spread to all nations

E. 31 They will come and will declare His righteousness To a people who will be born, that He has performed it.

1. Praise, for there is no doubt about the result

2. The sovereign Lord God will carry this out, bringing to Himself those who will shout forth His righteousness — Jeremiah 23:6

3. what a reason for us to praise Him in our prayers tonight!

from Prayer Meeting Devotions · Garth Hutchinson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrectionchurch

Filling Holes

Acts 5:29

The emergence of the Church, the emergence of followers even after Christ's death, despite intense opposition and even brutal persecution, is an enigma. Or, in the words of professor C.F.D. Moule of Cambridge University, it “rips a great hole in history, a hole of the size and shape of the Resurrection.” The book of Acts takes us to the first glimpses of that great hole.

The high priest was filled with rage. Jesus was no longer among them, but the disciples continued to fill Jerusalem with his teaching. He had strictly charged the apostles not to teach in Jesus' name, yet they continued preaching to the crowds and healing the sick, and multitudes were professing belief in Christ. So the high priest had them all arrested, and setting them before the council, he questioned them harshly. Peter answered exactly as he preached: “We must obey God rather than men! The God of our fathers raised Jesus... exalting him at his right hand as Leader and Savior, to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins. And we are witnesses to these things and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God has given to those who obey him” (Acts 5:29-32).

At his words, the council was enraged, and some wanted to kill them. But a Pharisee named Gamaliel, a teacher of the law held in honor by all the people, stood up to speak, first instructing that the apostles be led out of the room. And he said to them, “Men of Israel, take care what you are about to do with these men” (5:35).

Gamaliel's words introduce a logic often overlooked; he reminded them that this had happened before. He reminded them to look at history. “Before these days Theudas rose up,” he countered, “claiming to be somebody, and about four hundred men even joined him. But he was killed, and all who followed him were dispersed and came to nothing.” And after Theudas, Gamaliel warned, there were similar stories. “So in the present case I tell you, keep away from these men and let them alone, for if this plan or this undertaking is of man, it will fail; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them. You might even be found opposing God!” (5:38-39).

Though the growth of the Church alone is not enough to conclude the truth of Christ's resurrection, it is evidence that would be irresponsible to ignore. The apostles were aware that the message of the Cross is foolishness. They made choices to continue preaching despite the orders of the high priest and the often-severe persecution they faced. They changed social and religious practices that had been followed for centuries. They refused to give in; they would not be overthrown.

The birth and rapid rise of Christ's followers after the offensive death of their leader fails to make sense outside of the explanation the Church itself offers: they were witnesses of these altogether unfathomable events. The message they were teaching was true. Christ was raised and death was stopped, while the disciples looked on. They were witnesses of God's power, and they went to their deaths proclaiming it, choosing to obey God rather than man.

Christ left in history a hole the size and shape of the Resurrection. With what explanation will you attempt to fill it?

________

Copyright © 2004 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

An Easter Tool: Can You Believe God? the Four D's.

John 14:6

William Rainey once said, “Why didn’t somebody ever tell me that I could become a Christian and work on all my doubt afterward?” The fact is, every little step you take toward Christ moves you further away from the four “D”s — doubt, discouragement, depression and despair.

We’re all moving, but sometimes we move slowly. Are you struggling this Easter with one of these “D” issues?

• Are you doubting God’s love because you’re in a crisis? “God! I’ve just found out I have a terminal illness! Don’t you love me?”

• Are you discouraged because you don’t think he cares for you? “God! Don’t you see the trouble I’m in? Don’t you care?”

• Are you depressed because life has not turned out the way you thought it would? “God! My husband/wife is leaving me! Can’t you stop this from happening?”

• Are you despairing because you don’t think he’s forgiven you for your latest sin? “God! I still feel guilty. Haven’t you forgiven me?”

The Bible makes this statement in 1 John 5:13: “These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, in order that you may know that you have eternal life.” (NASB)

There’s a lot we don’t know, but the most important question has already been answered.

The things written in God’s Word are written so that you may know absolutely, for sure, for certain and with confidence that when you die you are going to heaven.

That doesn’t mean you won’t make mistakes. That doesn’t mean you won’t go through trials. That doesn’t mean you won’t disappoint people and they won’t disappoint you. That doesn’t mean you won’t sin.

The point is – you don’t have to be perfect to get to heaven, but you DO have to put your faith in Christ.

Thank God you don’t work your way to heaven; if that were the case, none of us would make it.

Jesus said, “I am the way … . No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6, NIV) Put your faith in him, not in your efforts, and you can know for sure that heaven is your destination.

Where have you been doubting God? In the area of your finances? Your family? Victory over a bad habit? Maybe you’ve been doubting that you’ll ever change.

The fact is, when Christ saved you, he solved your biggest problem. He has a solution for all the rest – but he’s limited by your unbelief.

There’s a tragic verse in the Bible that explains when Jesus went to his hometown of Nazareth “he did not do many miracles there because of their unbelief.” (Matt. 13:58, NASB)

If you want to see God work in your life, you’ve got to take some risks. Try that new approach. Begin that Bible study. Get involved. And then watch God work in your life.

~~~~~~~~~~

Churches may adapt this article for use within their congregations.

from Rick Warren's Ministry Toolbox Newsletter · Rick Warren via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database doubtdiscouragement

Quotes On the Resurrection

”Without the resurrection, our faith is dead. The story’s not complete without it.”

-- “The Passion” director Mel Gibson, explaining why the movie ends with a scene of the empty tomb — Outreach (Jan/Feb 2004)

“I know of no one fact in the history of mankind which is proved by better and fuller evidence of every sort, to the understanding of a fair inquirer, than the great sign which God has given us that Christ died and rose again from the dead.”

-- Oxford professor Thomas Arnold, author of the three-volume “History of Rome” — www.evantell.org

"The Resurrection is not merely important to the historic Christian faith — without it there would be no Christianity. It elevates Christianity above all other world religions. Through the Resurrection, Christ demonstrated that He does not stand in a line of peers with Abraham, Buddha, Confucius, or Muhammad. Jesus Christ is utterly unique. He had the power not only to lay down His life, but also to take it up again.”

-- Hank Hanegraff, Christian Research Institute

“After more than 700 hours of studying this subject, I have come to the conclusion that the resurrection of Jesus Christ is either one of the most wicked, vicious, heartless hoaxes ever foisted on the minds of human beings — or it is the most remarkable fact of history.”

-- Josh McDowell in “Evidence for the Resurrection”

“It is no exaggeration, therefore, to maintain that the bodily resurrection of Christ is as certain as any fact of history can ever be. If there is anything at all in which we can believe with absolute confidence, it is the fact that Jesus Christ died, was buried, then conquered death and is now alive!”

-- Henry Morris in “The Resurrection of Christ — The Best-Proved Fact in History”; www.icr.org/bible/troc.htm

from Rick Warren's Ministry Toolbox Newsletter via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database easter

The Passion Week (11) Resurrection Sunday Afternoon

Luke 24:13

Luke 24:13–43 — The Passion Week (11) Resurrection Sunday Afternoon « Leader information shown in this fashion »

A. Paul’s commentary: 1 Corinthians 15:3–4 (NKJV): 3 For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, … we now continue look at that third day:

B. The disciples on the road to Emmaus

1. Mark’s short version, 16:12–13 (NKJV): 12 After that, He appeared in another form to two of them as they walked and went into the country. 13 And they went and told it to the rest, but they did not believe them either.

2. Luke’s long version, 16:13–32

a. Part 1, Meeting the Risen Jesus, Luke 24:13–17 (NKJV): 13 Now behold, two of them were travelling that same day to a village called Emmaus, which was seven miles from Jerusalem. 14 And they talked together of all these things which had happened. 15 So it was, while they conversed and reasoned, that Jesus Himself drew near and went with them. 16 But their eyes were restrained, so that they did not know Him. 17 And He said to them, “What kind of conversation is this that you have with one another as you walk and are sad?”

(A) what marked these two as disciples?

(1) their « walking and talking together about Jesus; conjectured as being Luke himself, or husband/wife »

(2) their « sadness (looking glum, Hendriksen) His death »

(B) why did they not recognize Jesus « — not from unbelief, but by the hand of God … restrained »

«

(C) the exact identification of Emmaus is not known; what they reasoned over is to be found in the next verses »

b. Part 2, Explaining to Jesus, Luke 24:18–24 (NKJV): 18 Then the one whose name was Cleopas answered and said to Him, “Are You the only stranger in Jerusalem, and have You not known the things which happened there in these days?” 19 And He said to them, “What things?” So they said to Him, “The things concerning Jesus of Nazareth, who was a Prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people, 20 and how the chief priests and our rulers delivered Him to be condemned to death, and crucified Him. 21 But we were hoping that it was He who was going to redeem Israel. Indeed, besides all this, today is the third day since these things happened. 22 Yes, and certain women of our company, who arrived at the tomb early, astonished us. 23 When they did not find His body, they came saying that they had also seen a vision of angels who said He was alive. 24 And certain of those who were with us went to the tomb and found it just as the women had said; but Him they did not see.” –what were the key things they discussed …

(A) concerning Jesus of Nazareth?

(1) « a Prophet »

(2) « mighty in deed and word »

(3) before « God and man »

(B) concerning their rulers?

(1) responsible for « His being condemned »

(2) responsible for « His opprobrious death »

(C) their hopes?

(1) « a national Redeemer, the promised Deliverer (but first word implies that it is at a cost »

(2) « the expectation on the third day »

(D) their current quandary – what to believe?

(1) « the news of the women, the body gone, the angels »

(2) « the findings of Peter and John »

(3) « (may have left before Mary Magdalene’s news) »

c. Part 3, Instructed by Jesus, Luke 24:25–27 (NKJV): 25 Then He said to them, “O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken! 26 Ought not the Christ to have suffered these things and to enter into His glory?” 27 And beginning at Moses and all the Prophets, He expounded to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself.

(A) how would you respond to a sermon starting that way? « — probably rather negatively! He is saying, “you are not using your brain (the same word that Paul employs of the Galations, 3:1) and you are awfully slow at picking things up! How dull you are!” »

(B) what does this tell us about Christian faith? « — (1) it is not blind but means the using of our intellects to the best of our abilities (2) both suffering & glory were promised »

(C) what was the basis of Jesus’ instruction? « – all of the Old Testament Scriptures; here, as in other places, Prophets is intended to include all the non-Mosaic writings; this is implicit in the phrase “in or by all the Scriptures” – it could be paraphrase, “from the whole Old Testament” But, the word “all” has another implication: they knew of the Messiah’s glory, but not of His suffering »

(D) what does this tell us about this part of the Bible and the Christian? « — their subject is Christ, and are there for our instruction and understanding »

d. Part 4, Recognizing Jesus, Luke 24:38–32 (NKJV): 28 Then they drew near to the village where they were going, and He indicated that He would have gone farther. 29 But they constrained Him, saying, “Abide with us, for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent.” And He went in to stay with them. 30 Now it came to pass, as He sat at the table with them, that He took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to them. 31 Then their eyes were opened and they knew Him; and He vanished from their sight. 32 And they said to one another, “Did not our heart burn within us while He talked with us on the road, and while He opened the Scriptures to us?”

(A) what Christian grace did these two disciples show? « — that of hospitality »

(B) how did Jesus given them opportunity for this?

(1) by not « thrusting His continued presence upon them »

(2) by the « encouraging words He had given them »

(C) what opened their eyes? « — the way Jesus gave thanks and broke the bread (and the Holy Spirit!) »

(D) what does this tell us about Jesus? « — His prayer life, even in something as simple as giving thanks for food, was unique, manifesting His relationship with the Father »

3. The Two Disciples’ Testimony, Luke 24:33–35 (NKJV): 33 So they rose up that very hour and returned to Jerusalem, and found the eleven and those who were with them gathered together, 34 saying, “The Lord is risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!” 35 And they told about the things that had happened on the road, and how He was known to them in the breaking of bread.

a. Paul’s commentary, continued; 1 Corinthians 15:5a (NKJV): “and that He was seen by Cephas, …” (Aramaic equivalent of Peter, “rock” and another name for Simon)

b. how do you find this account of the two disciples affect you? « — it transformed them from dragging along the road home to returning in danger of dark to tell the others; the distance is a little less than from Bloomington Road to Green Lane »

4. Jesus Appears to Them, Luke 24:36–43 (NKJV): 36 Now as they said these things, Jesus Himself stood in the midst of them, and said to them, “Peace to you.” 37 But they were terrified and frightened, and supposed they had seen a spirit. 38 And He said to them, “Why are you troubled? And why do doubts arise in your hearts? 39 Behold My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself. Handle Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see I have.” 40 When He had said this, He showed them His hands and His feet. 41 But while they still did not believe for joy, and marvelled, He said to them, “Have you any food here?” 42 So they gave Him a piece of a broiled fish and some honeycomb. 43 And He took it and ate in their presence.

a. Paul’s commentary, continued; 1 Corinthians 15:5b (NKJV) “… then by the twelve.” (although this could be next Sunday)

b. Summation of verse 38 in Mark 16:14 (NKJV): Later He appeared to the eleven as they sat at the table; and He rebuked their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they did not believe those who had seen Him after He had risen.

c. A parallel passage, John 20:19–25 (NKJV): 20 When He had said this, He showed them His hands and His side. Then the disciples were glad when they saw the Lord. 21 So Jesus said to them again, “Peace to you! As the Father has sent Me, I also send you.” 22 And when He had said this, He breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit. 23 If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.” 24 Now Thomas, called the Twin, one of the twelve, was not with them when Jesus came. 25 The other disciples therefore said to him, “We have seen the Lord.” So he said to them, “Unless I see in His hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe.”

(A) we will be looking at the final commissions of Jesus later

d. what characterizes Jesus’ words and actions to them? « — they are comforting (”Peace:”) and assuring (”Look, Touch”) but also challenging (”Unbelief” and “hardness of heart”) »

e. what do you note about the resurrected body of Jesus (which is a first fruit of our own resurrection)?

(A) it was not « bound by the material world (as doors) »

(B) it could be « touched and seen as well as a solid »

(C) it bore the « effects of His earthly life: scars and wounds »

(D) it was capable « of ingestion »

f. what is your estimation of Thomas’ doubting? « — he was in no way more so that most, if not all, of the rest of the disciples — the reacted with fear: it took them all a while to realize the truth of the resurrection »

from Sunday Bible School · Garth Hutchinson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

The Passion Week (10) Nearly Over; From the Crucifixion Until Resurrection Sunday Morning

Luke 23:55

Luke 23:55–24:12 — The Passion Week (10) Nearly Over; from the Crucifixion until Resurrection Sunday morning « Leader information shown in this fashion »

A. In the Tomb

1. we closed last week with Jesus being laid in the unused tomb by Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus, which took place in the last three hours (3:00 to 6:00 pm) of the day of Preparation « (use the illustration of the limits of a 2-dimensional picture to show why four independent accounts better render the story) »

2. Watched by the Women, Luke 23:55–56 (NKJV; parallels, Matthew 27:61–66, Mark 15:47): 55 And the women who had come with Him from Galilee followed after, and they observed the tomb and how His body was laid. 56 Then they returned and prepared spices and fragrant oils. And they rested on the Sabbath according to the commandment.

a. the Sabbath came and so prevented many of the steps that were normally taken in burial; but the women got ready as much as they could, then rested on the Sabbath

3. Watched by the Guards, Matthew 27:62–66 (NKJV): 62 On the next day, which followed the Day of Preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees gathered together to Pilate, 63 saying, “Sir, we remember, while He was still alive, how that deceiver said, ‘After three days I will rise.’ 64 Therefore command that the tomb be made secure until the third day, lest His disciples come by night and steal Him away, and say to the people, ‘He has risen from the dead.’ So the last deception will be worse than the first.” 65 Pilate said to them, “You have a guard; go your way, make it as secure as you know how.” 66 So they went and made the tomb secure, sealing the stone and setting the guard.

a. the next day is to be understood in the Jewish sense, ie., after sundown which was the start of the Sabbath; how do the rulers’ actions answer Jesus’ question of Mark 3:4 / Luke 6:9? « — the Sabbath did not keep them from their evil deeds »

b. how were the Jewish rulers restricted in their attempt to ensure that there was no deception? « — Pilate gave them carte blanche “as secures as you know how” … they were limited only by their unbelief »

c. what did the Jewish rulers unwittingly accomplish? « — they provided evidence of the reality of the resurrection »

4. The Women Buy Spices, Mark 16:1 (NKJV): Now when the Sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome bought spices, that they might come and anoint Him.

a. how much time had they had on Friday to prepare the body for burial? « – less than three hours (there was the time taken to get permission and for Nicodemus’ bringing the myrrh and aloes) »

b. we noted that these women were witnesses to His death, and to His burial; what were their plans? « – to complete the burial process. »

5. The Angel Rolls Away the Stone, Matthew 28:1–4 (NAS): { 1 Now after the Sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to look at the grave.} 2 And behold, a severe earthquake had occurred, for an angel of the Lord descended from heaven and came and rolled away the stone and sat upon it. 3 And his appearance was like lightning, and his garment as white as snow; 4 and the guards shook for fear of him, and became like dead men.

a. We will return in the next section to the women arriving at the tomb as found in verse 1. The King James version reads “In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week…” Some thought that this took place in the evening after sunset, interpreting “to dawn” as “to start.” But, the literal meaning of the word is “to become light” and only figuratively “to start.” (as the day).

b. why was the stone rolled away? « — not to let the risen Jesus out (He could pass through doors, John 20:26) but to open the tomb that the world may know that He indeed is risen »

B. The Resurrection Discovered

1. Luke 24:1–8 (NKJV): 1 Now on the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they, and certain other women with them, came to the tomb bringing the spices which they had prepared. 2 But they found the stone rolled away from the tomb. 3 Then they went in and did not find the body of the Lord Jesus. 4 And it happened, as they were greatly perplexed about this, that behold, two men stood by them in shining garments. 5 Then, as they were afraid and bowed their faces to the earth, they said to them, “Why do you seek the living among the dead? 6 He is not here, but is risen! Remember how He spoke to you when He was still in Galilee, 7 saying, ‘The Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again.’” 8 And they remembered His words.

2. Matthew 28:5–7 (and Mark) only describe the “spokes-angel” (with Mark noting that by this point the angel was in the tomb with them): 5 But the angel answered and said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you seek Jesus who was crucified. 6 He is not here; for He is risen, as He said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay. 7 And go quickly and tell His disciples that He is risen from the dead, and indeed He is going before you into Galilee; there you will see Him. Behold, I have told you.”

a. what does the Resurrection prove (Romans 1:4)? « — that Jesus is the Son of God with power »

b. what does the Resurrection prove (1 Corinthians 15:17, 20)? « — our sins are forgiven and we look forward to resurrection »

3. What were the feelings of the women?

a. Matthew 28:8–9 (NKJV): 8 So they went out quickly from the tomb with fear and great joy, and ran to bring His disciples word. 9 And as they went to tell His disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying, “Rejoice!” So they came and held Him by the feet and worshipped Him. « — fear, joy, worship »

b. Mark 16:8 (NKJV): So they went out quickly and fled from the tomb, for they trembled and were amazed. And they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid. « — fear, trembling, astonishment »

C. The Women Report to the Disciples, Luke 24:9–12 (NKJV) 9 Then they returned from the tomb and told all these things to the eleven and to all the rest. 10 It was Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and the other women with them, who told these things to the apostles. 11 And their words seemed to them like idle tales, and they did not believe them. 12 But Peter arose and ran to the tomb; and stooping down, he saw the linen cloths lying by themselves; and he departed, marvelling to himself at what had happened.

D. More about Mary Magdalene, Peter and the Other Disciple, John 20:1–10 (NKJV): 1 Now on the first day of the week Mary Magdalene went to the tomb early, while it was still dark, and saw that the stone had been taken away from the tomb. 2 Then she ran and came to Simon Peter, and to the other disciple, whom Jesus loved, and said to them, “They have taken away the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not know where they have laid Him.” 3 Peter therefore went out, and the other disciple, and were going to the tomb. 4 So they both ran together, and the other disciple outran Peter and came to the tomb first. 5 And he, stooping down and looking in, saw the linen cloths lying there; yet he did not go in. 6 Then Simon Peter came, following him, and went into the tomb; and he saw the linen cloths lying there, 7 and the handkerchief that had been around His head, not lying with the linen cloths, but folded together in a place by itself. 8 Then the other disciple, who came to the tomb first, went in also; and he saw and believed. 9 For as yet they did not know the Scripture, that He must rise again from the dead. 10 Then the disciples went away again to their own homes.

1. what do you think abut the “handkerchief … folded?” « — this tells of an orderliness quite at variance with grave robbery »

2. they did not yet know the Scriptures; how did that change in

a. Acts 2:24–32 (Psalm 16:8–11)? « – the Messiah could not stay dead (see corruption) »

b. Acts 2:32–36 (Psalm 110:1)? « – the exaltation of the Messiah has the resurrection as a prerequisite »

3. what occasioned this difference (Acts 2:4, 16-17)? « – the Holy Spirit fulfilling John 14:26 »

E. Still More about Mary Magdalene, John 20:11–18 (NKJV): 11 But Mary stood outside by the tomb weeping, and as she wept she stooped down and looked into the tomb. 12 And she saw two angels in white sitting, one at the head and the other at the feet, where the body of Jesus had lain. 13 Then they said to her, “Woman, why are you weeping?” She said to them, “Because they have taken away my Lord, and I do not know where they have laid Him.” 14 Now when she had said this, she turned around and saw Jesus standing there, and did not know that it was Jesus. 15 Jesus said to her, “Woman, why are you weeping? Whom are you seeking?” She, supposing Him to be the gardener, said to Him, “Sir, if You have carried Him away, tell me where You have laid Him, and I will take Him away.” 16 Jesus said to her, “Mary!” She turned and said to Him, “Rabboni!” (which is to say, Teacher). 17 Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’” 18 Mary Magdalene came and told the disciples that she had seen the Lord, and that He had spoken these things to her.

1. why was Mary Magdalene weeping? … what is your reaction to that? « – she still thought Jesus was dead and was looking for His body to complete His burial; how hard it was for these disciples and women to believe, despite what they saw and the what the angel had said »

2. what occasioned recognition? « — hearing Jesus speak her name »

3. why was Mary not to cling to Jesus (the women had done so to His feet and later Thomas would be invited to touch Him)? « — because He was not yet ascended (there would be time to see Him again) and because she was to go and tell others »

4. what marks a new relationship with the risen Christ? … what is the reason (Hebrews 2:10–11)? « — He is our elder brother; His suffering on the cross brings believers into this glorious state »

F. The Report of the Guard, Matthew 28:11-15 (NKJV): 11 Now while they were going, behold, some of the guard came into the city and reported to the chief priests all the things that had happened. 12 When they had assembled with the elders and consulted together, they gave a large sum of money to the soldiers, 13 saying, “Tell them, ‘His disciples came at night and stole Him away while we slept.’ 14 And if this comes to the governor’s ears, we will appease him and make you secure.” 15 So they took the money and did as they were instructed; and this saying is commonly reported among the Jews until this day.

1. this took place after the women had run to tell the other disciples and had met Jesus on the way (Matthew 28:8–10)

2. what are the weak points in this conspiracy?

a. « it confirmed Jesus really died, so any objective evidence of His now being alive meant that He arose from the dead »

b. « the guard (as many as 60) all asleep at once? … the penalty of sleeping on duty was death! If they were asleep, how did they know who stole the body? »

c. « the body stolen by the faint-hearted, scattered disciples? »

d. « though commonly reported, Josephus 18:3:3 records the truth »

from Sunday Bible School · Garth Hutchinson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

The Resurrection of Jesus For Skeptics

Luke 24:1

THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS FOR SKEPTICS - part 1

===============================================

An unbeliever once told a Scottish preacher, “It is upon an empty tomb that Christianity is founded.” What he thought was a rebuke of Christianity was actually a powerful proof of it. A man supposedly went to a famous French statesman for advice. This man tried to found his own religious system and had failed to draw a following or much interest. The statesman told him how he could gain a great following: “Go and be crucified and then raise yourself from the grave the third day.” The resurrection of Christ was a proof that Jesus was the divine Son of God.

Christians are the first to realize, though, that not everyone believes in the resurrection of Christ. For example, in A.D. 150 a Christian named Justin wrote a work on the resurrection. He answered many questions people had about it and some objections a few had to it. Justin was a remarkable man. He was a Gentile born in Samaria near Jacob's well. He was well-educated. He was a truth-seeker. He tried all the philosophies of his day and was not satisfied with any of them. Finally after studying Plato, Socrates and many others, he found what he was looking for in Jesus of Nazareth. He continued to wear his philosopher's gown after his conversion, saying he had finally found the true philosophy. He spent the rest of his life defending Christianity as that true philosophy. His story is a tremendous one and his defense of the resurrection of Jesus is just one in a long string of similar apologies over the past 2000 years.

Nevertheless there are still skeptics, some even pretending to be Christians. Some of the liberal preachers, teachers and theologians in denominations today claim to be Christians yet they deny the resurrection of Christ. Such is a horrible inconsistency. How do they deny something that is taught so plainly in the Bible? They claim everything in the New Testament was written as late as they can date it. The later the better. This leaves a longer gap of time between the events and the recording of the events. Even then, realize we are speaking of less than seventy years for the whole New Testament! During this period of time the liberals claim that everything the church believed was reshaped and transformed by the worship and preaching of the church. Obviously there is some truth to that, but they claim it was drastically changed and altered, that events which never occurred were made up or fabricated to justify some teaching.

The liberals speak of the resurrection faith. What they mean by this is that the disciples believed Jesus was raised from the dead. The liberals do not believe it really happened. They just think the disciples believed it happened and that faith changed them. They ought to be more honest with people and speak of the resurrection hoax or fiction. One well known religious writer, in reaction to a recent book which denied the deity of Christ and his resurrection, said, “Maybe it's time we leveled with the public.” This sort of belief is quite common in many denominations. You need to make sure that the church to which you belong truly believes in the resurrection of Jesus Christ, not just in a resurrection faith that some disciples supposedly wrongly held in the first century!

Our study today will examine the resurrection of Jesus from the viewpoint of the liberal critic of the Bible. If a person believes and trusts the Bible as the word of God, all we have to do is show them that the Bible tells us Jesus was raised from the dead. That is all the evidence they need. Everyone does not believe the Bible, though. Some people need to be shown proofs and evidences which we are glad to do. There are certain types of proof, certain ways of examining historical data which some liberals use, though, which are not as commonly known. In our lesson we will use those methods to prove the resurrection. The very techniques developed by the liberal critics who deny the resurrection can be used to strongly affirm and prove the resurrection of Christ.

Here is one example of their methodology. If something is expected to happen but does not happen, then in order to take hold of a claim or a title a devoted follower might distort the truth and pretend it really did happen. If the Messiah was supposed to do something, then the apostles might pretend that Jesus did so that they could convince others he was the Christ. On the other hand if something was not expected to happen and the apostles then made the claim that it did, it probably really did happen. This is a common test of historical credibility by the liberal critic. It takes a very dim view of honesty among human beings, but it is their method nevertheless.

Let us apply their test to the resurrection. If the apostles were expecting Jesus to be raised from the dead, then according to the liberals it is possible that they made up the resurrection story. In the New Testament, though, we see it is not that way. Despite the fact that Jesus told them ahead of time about his resurrection, they still were not expecting it. For example, Jesus said, “'Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up'....He spoke of the temple of his body” (Jn. 2:19, 21). As Matthew recalls, “From that time Jesus began to show his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and on the third day be raised” (Mt. 16:21). After the transfiguration Jesus commanded them, “Tell no one the vision, until the Son of man is raised from the dead” (Mt. 17:9). Repeatedly Jesus foretold his resurrection from the dead (Mt. 17:22-23; 20:18-19; 26:32; 27:63).

Apparently the apostles did not listen very well or did not believe. They were not expecting the resurrection. They were surprised and amazed when it occurred. By the liberal critics own standard of historical reliability, then, the resurrection must have really occurred! Friends, if the apostles were going to make up and fabricate a story about Jesus, they would have made up a story about Jesus conquering a whole legion of Roman soldiers singlehandedly in the Judean desert. That is what people expected the Messiah to do. People did not expect the Messiah to die on a Roman cross and then be raised from the dead. So what the New Testament tells must have really happened.

In our next study we will look at more proofs of the resurrection from the viewpoint of the liberal critic. (W. Harland Dilbeck, “The Bodily Resurrection of Christ,” Firm Foundation, 13 December 1977, pp. 6, 10; Roger S. Busse, “Historical Criticism and the Resurrection,” Firm Foundation, 13 December 1977, pp. 7, 11; 20 December 1977, pp. 8, 10).

===============================================

THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS FOR SKEPTICS - part 2

In our last study we began an examination of the historical reliability of the New Testament account of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Instead of just accepting what the Bible says, we approached the study from the standpoint of a liberal, skeptical critic. The liberal historian uses certain standards by which he declares documents reliable or fabrications. By the liberal critic's own standards, though, the NT accounts of the resurrection of Jesus are shown to be reliable and certain! Let us continue that study.

One method of determining historical reliability is this. If something is said to make the writer himself or his friends look good, the liberal critic says the statement is suspicious. The writer probably made it up in order to make himself look good. It would be like an athlete telling of an athletic achievement. He is likely to brag and boast a little, stretching the truth a little for his own glory. On the other hand, though, if someone tells a story which is not complimentary to the teller or his friends, it is likely to be true. “Why would he make up a story that makes himself look bad?”, the liberal critic asks. It is a natural human tendency to make self look good. If you are telling a story about yourself you are more likely to skip the parts that make you look bad than the parts that make you look good. Let us examine the NT accounts of the resurrection by this standard or measurement.

The NT accounts of the resurrection do not make heroes out of the apostles and early disciples. The accounts make them look quite bad! When soldiers came to arrest Jesus, the apostles ran away in fear. One of them, Peter, denied he even knew Jesus three times. They hid in fear after Jesus' death. When some women came and told them Jesus had been raised from the dead, they were reluctant to believe it. When some of the apostles saw Jesus alive and believed, they told Thomas who had not been with them. Even with other apostles telling him, Thomas did not believe it either. He had to see Jesus with his own eyes before he would believe. Two disciples on the road to Emmaeus were extremely slow to recognize and believe in Jesus. Even after these resurrection appearances, the apostles had not figured out the complete significance of it all. When Jesus met them in Galilee, they had gone back to fishing. The whole account of Jesus' resurrection shows how frail and weak the apostles and early disciples were. It is clearly not a fabrication. By the liberal critic's own standard of measurement, the apostles must have been telling the truth.

Now let us look at our final method of determining historical reliability as used by liberal historical critics today. If a person is fabricating a story, it is claimed that they will make the story sound as good as possible in order that others will be likely to accept it. If you are making up an argument for an event, you want it to be as plausible as possible. You do not want to write a story in such a way that it is difficult to believe. For example, if you are trying to explain why you are late for school, you would not make up a ridiculous story about being kidnapped by an alien spaceship. No one would believe that. They might believe that you ran out of gas. Let us examine the NT account of Jesus' resurrection by this standard.

If the apostles were making up the account of the resurrection, whom would they have as eyewitnesses? They would want the most credible and reliable persons possible. They would pretend that a Roman centurion soldier, a Jewish priest, a scribe, a Jewish temple guard, and a Roman government official all saw Jesus alive. That would be impressive. That would be a marvelous list of eyewitnesses. When we turn to the NT account of the witnesses to the resurrection, though, we read a very different story. The first appearance of Jesus after his resurrection was to common peasant women!

I do not know how acceptable the testimony of women is where you live, but in the first century the testimony of women was not considered very important. Women were not allowed to give testimony. When the women told the male disciples they had seen Jesus alive, the men did not take them seriously: “But these words seemed to them an idle tale, and they did not believe them” (Lk. 24:11). The word “idle” here is sometimes used in Greek medical language for the wild talk of a delirious person. The Latin word in the Latin translations of this verse is the word from which the English words “delirious” and “delirium” come. The testimony of these women was considered to be a bunch of “wives' tales” as we sometimes say.

If the resurrection story in the NT was made up, the writers who made it up did a horrible job. If they were going to fabricate a story about the resurrection of Jesus, they would not have made the first appearance of Jesus occur to women. The fact that the NT reports it this way, then, is a strong evidence that it must have actually happened that way. By the liberal critic's own standard of measuring historical reliability, the resurrection is shown to be a fact of history. It really occurred. The account is no fabrication but is literal history. Christians should teach the resurrection of Jesus Christ with absolute and total assurance. There should be no wavering of doubt in our hearts -- Jesus Christ is alive!

Some years ago a man's beloved wife died. He suffered from a terrible fit of depression. His wife has been his best friend and closest companion for most of his life. He called in a minister to inquire about the resurrection and eternal life. He wanted to know if there was any evidence for it and if he might ever see his wife again. The minister was a very liberal one who did not really believe in the resurrection. He beat around the bush and gave an evasive answer. The man then called in another minister and asked the same question, telling of his disappointment in the first minister. When he asked the second minister if there is a resurrection and another life, the answer he received was, “Yes”. We can answer that question with a decisive, definite, certain, absolute, confident, secure, and unhesitating “Yes”. We can know it to be a fact, because we know Jesus was raised from the dead.

*

Buried By Mistake

Luke 16:27

Live burial is not unheard of; it has always been a real (albeit distant) possibility. Indeed, it’s conceivable the first burials of humans were accidental, live ones: Ill and wounded hunters were left in caves with the entrances sealed off to keep out wild animals while the rest of the hunting parties continued after their prey. It was hoped that once the victims had regained their strength, they would push the barriers out of the way and rejoin the group. Some died in those caves, however.

The still-living have been consigned to an eternal dirt nap often enough that fears of premature burial are based on fact as much as on lore. Numerous cases of interments and almost interments dot history.

In the first century, the magician Simon Magus, according to one report, buried himself alive, expecting a miracle — a miracle that didn’t happen. On Iona, in the sixth century, one of St. Columba’s monks, Oran, was dug up the day after his burial and found to be alive. Legend has it when he told his fellows he had seen heaven and hell, he was promptly dispatched and re-interred on grounds of heresy. And the 13th-century Thomas a Kempis, the reputed author of the great devotional work The Imitation of Christ, was never made a saint because, it was said, when they dug up his body for the ossuary they found scratch marks on the lid of his coffin and concluded that he was not reconciled to his fate.

In the late 16th century, the body of Matthew Wall was being borne to his grave in Braughing, England. One of the pallbearers tripped, causing the others to drop the coffin, thus reviving the dear departed. Wall lived on for several more years, dying in 1595. He celebrated his ‘resurrection’ every year.

In the early 17th century, Marjorie Elphinstone died and was buried in Ardtannies, Scotland. When grave robbers attempted to steal the jewelry interred with her, the deceased surprised the heck out of them by groaning. The robbers fled for their lives, and Elphinstone revived, walked home, and outlived her husband by six years.

Marjorie Halcrow Erskine of Chirnside, Scotland, died in 1674 and was buried in a shallow grave by a sexton intent upon returning later to steal her jewelry. While the light-fingered sexton was trying to cut off her finger to retrieve a ring, she awoke. In her additional years of life after her first burial, she went on to give birth to and raise two sons. No one knows what happened to the sexton.

The 17th century saw a number of premature burials. Collapse and apparent death were not uncommon during epidemics of plague, cholera, and smallpox. From contemporary medical sources, William Tebb compiled 219 instances of narrow escape from premature burial, 149 cases of actual premature burial, 10 cases in which bodies were accidentally dissected before death, and 2 cases in which embalming was started on the not-yet-dead.

Some instances were especially heartbreaking. In the 1850s, a young girl visiting Edisto Island, South Carolina, died of diptheria. She was quickly interred in a local family’s mausoleum because it was feared the disease might otherwise spread. When one of the family’s sons died in the Civil War, the tomb was opened to admit him. A tiny skeleton was found on the floor just behind the door.

A correspondent at Naples states that the Appeals Court has had before it a case not likely to inspire confidence in the minds of those who look forward with horror to the possibility of being buried alive. It appeared from the evidence that some time ago, a woman was interred with all the usual formalities, it being believed that she was dead, while she was only in a trance. Some days afterwards, when the grave in which she had been placed was opened for the reception of another body, it was found that the clothes which covered the unfortunate woman were torn to pieces, and that she had even broken her limbs in attempting to extricate herself from the living tomb. The Court, after hearing the case, sentenced the doctor who had signed the certificate of decease, and the Major who had authorized the interment each to three month’s imprisonment for involuntary manslaughter. [British Medical Journal, 1877]

A recent “not quite all the way over the line yet” news story comes from 1993:

Sipho William Mdletshe might as well be dead, as far as his fiancee is concerned.

Declared deceased after a traffic accident in Johannesburg, South Africa, Mdletshe, 24, spent two days in a metal box in a mortuary before his cries alerted workers, who rescued him.

But Mdletshe is heartbroken, because his fiancee, who also was hurt in the crash, doesn’t believe his story and refuses to see him. She thinks he’s a zombie who returned from the dead to haunt her.

In 1994, 86-year-old Mildred C. Clarke spent ninety minutes in a body bag in the morgue at the Albany Medical Center Hospital before an attendant noticed the bag was breathing. She’d been found sprawled on her living room floor, cold and motionless, with no detectable heartbeat, breath, or other signs of life. She was also as stiff as a board. The coroner didn’t have to think twice about declaring her dead. She apparently did not agree with his verdict, and, with care, lived a week longer.

Okay, so it happens. But how common an occurrence is it?

In 1896, T.M. Montgomery, who supervised the disinterment and moving of the remains at the Fort Randall Cemetery, reported that “nearly 2% of those exhumed were no doubt victims of suspended animation.”

These days, getting accidentally buried alive in the United States or Canada borders on the impossible. Embalming procedures will finish off anyone not quite all the way through the Pearly Gates, and the families of deceased citizens of both those countries overwhelmingly opt to have their loved ones embalmed.

(Contrary to popular belief, embalming is not mandatory in the United States. Corpses carry little disease risk — we pose a much greater threat to the public health while we’re still breathing, bleeding, and shedding skin. Proof of this lack of danger is found in the Centers for Disease Control’s study into the risk factors inherent to workers in the funeral business — they found those who deal with cadavers have no greater mortality rate than the general population, nor does their occupation appear to hold special danger of infection.

Moreover, despite the claims of the funeral industry, normal embalming does not kill all disease-causing organisms in a cadaver. One study found common pathogens (including the tuberculosis bacillus) still present in 22 of 23 cadavers within 24 to 48 hours of embalming. Other infectious organisms are vitually unaffected by normal embalming, including those that cause anthrax, tetanus and gas gangrene.)

There have been deaths by embalming. In 1837, Cardinal Somaglia was taken ill, passed out, and was thought to have died. Preparations were begun immediately to embalm this very important church official. When the surgeon/embalmer cut into the chest to instill embalming materials, he could see the cardinal’s heart still beating. Worse, at this point, the cardinal awoke from his stupor and wisely pushed the knife away from his chest. His effort was to no avail, though — the chest incision killed him.

Sometimes the presumed corpse’s ‘still living’ status is only discovered when someone sets about to perform a post-mortem. A 1996 newspaper article reports:

In 1984, a post-mortem examination was being conducted in a mortuary in New York. When the pathologist made the first cut the “corpse” leaped up and grabbed him by the throat. The pathologist died of shock.

The case of Daphne Banks, who was pronounced dead on New Year’s Eve [1995] but showed signs of life when she got to the mortuary, is by no means unique. From the time of Plato to the present there are many well-documented accounts of the dead coming back to life.

The Reverend Schwartz, a missionary, was brought back to life by hearing his favourite hymn played at his funeral. The mourners were surprised to hear his voice from the coffin joining in the singing. Nicephorus Glycas, the Greek Orthodox Bishop of Lesbos, laid in state in his church for two days while mourners filed past his coffin. Suddenly he sat up and demanded to know what everybody was looking at.

The discovery that a corpse still has some life left in him isn’t a new phenomenon:

The 20 of Februarie [1587], a strange thing happened to a man hanged for felonie at Saint Thomas Waterines, being begged by the Chirugeons of London, to have made of him an anatomie, after he was dead to all men’s thinking, cut downe, throwne into a carre, and so brought from the place of execution through the Borough of Southwarke over the bridge, and through the Citie of London to the Chirugeons Hall nere unto Cripelgate: The chest being opened there, and the weather extreme cold hee was found to be alive, and lived till three and twentie of Februarie, and then died. [Stowe’s Annals, 1587]

One of the most famous of such cases is that of Anne Greene who, after being hanged for a felony on 14 December 1650, was sent to the anatomy hall to be used for dissection. She awoke and lived on for many years afterwards.

Rapist-murderer William Duell was hanged at Tyburn in November 1740 and taken for dissection. The assistant noted the deceased was breathing and had a faint pulse. Although he was in great pain, two hours later the dead man was sitting in a chair drinking wine. He was sent back to prison and later exiled for life.

Around the same time, Professor Junkur of Halle University received a sack with the body of a hanged criminal to be used for dissection. The body was dumped in his house after dark when the professor had already gone to bed. During the night, the professor was awakened by the figure of a naked and shivering man holding an empty sack. The professor decided to help the man escape further punishment and some years later encountered him on the street, a wealthy merchant with a wife and two children.

Not every anatomist was so kind-hearted. The Newgate Calendar quoted the surgeon who worked on an eighteenth century German criminal as saying:

I am pretty certain, gentlemen, from the warmth of the subject and the flexibility of the limbs, that by a proper degree of attention and care the vital heat would return, and life in consequence take place. But when it is considered what a rascal we should again have among us, that he was hanged for so cruel a murder, and that, should we restore him to life, he would probably kill somebody else. I say, gentlemen, all these things considered, it is my opinion that we had better proceed in the dissection.

Okay, so it was (and still is) possible to be buried alive or to meet your maker on a post-mortem table. The prospect is chilling, and numerous people have gone to great lengths to make sure it doesn’t happen to them. The practice of ‘waking’ the dead (having someone sit with the deceased from the time of death until burial in case he ‘wakes up’) began out of this concern. Especially in bygone days when a number of illnesses could cause the sufferer to slip into a coma and thus make it appear all life functions had been snuffed out, the danger of overly hasty interment was real. (Edgar Allen Poe’s macabre short stories, most notably “Premature Burial,” certainly helped increase such fears among the general populace.)

Some went so far as to specify in their wills they wanted special tests performed on their bodies to make sure they were actually dead. Surgical incisions, the application of boiling hot liquids, touching red-hot irons to their flesh, stabbing them through the heart, or even decapitating them were all specified at different times as a way of making sure they didn’t wake up six feet under. Some opted for being buried with the means to do themselves in, and guns, knives, and poison were packed into coffins along with the deceased.

The screams of a young Belgian girl who came out of a trance-like state as the earth fell on her coffin so upset Count Karnice-Karnicki, Chamberlain to the Czar and Doctor of the Law Faculty of the University of Louvain, that he invented a coffin which allowed a person accidentally buried alive to summon help through a system of flags and bells. Patented in 1897, this hermetically-sealed coffin had a tube, about 3.5 inches in diameter, extending to a box on the surface. The tube was attached to a spring-loaded ball sitting on the corpse’s chest. Any movement of the chest would release the spring, opening the box lid and admitting light and air into the coffin. To signal for help, a flag would spring up, a bell would ring for half an hour, and a lamp would burn after sunset. Similar “life-signalling” coffins were patented in the United States.

Those old-fashioned devices might sound quaint and out of place in modern society, but concern over live burial has prompted the redirection of newer technologies to take the place of red flags and whistles.

Evangelist Mary Baker Eddy has long been rumored to have been interred along with a functioning telephone. That bit of popular lore likely grew out of a misremembering of the circumstances of her burial. After she died at her home in Boston, in December 1910, her body was kept at the general receiving vault at Mount Auburn Cemetery in nearby Cambridge for several months while her monument was being constructed. Because she was a world renowned figure and there was some fear of thievery, a guard was hired to stay with the body until it was interred and the tomb sealed, and a telephone was installed at the receiving vault for his use during that period. There was never a phone at the monument, inside or outside.

The same rumor is associated with Aimee Semple McPherson, another famous evangelist. She was buried in 1944 in Los Angeles’ Forest Lawn Memorial Park. McPherson used a telephone on the stage of her Angeles Temple to keep in contact with her radio crew during sermons, and this may have contributed to the rumor. More likely, people confused her with Mary Baker Eddy.

In 1995 a $5,000 Italian casket equipped with call-for-help ability and survival kit went on sale. Akin to beeping devices which alert relatives to an elderly family member’s being in trouble, this casket is equipped with a beeper which will sound a similar emergency signal. The coffins are also fitted with a two-way microphone/speaker to enable communication between the occupant and someone outside, and a kit which includes a torch, a small oxygen tank, a sensor to detect a person’s heartbeat, and even a heart stimulator.

Those worried about premature burial would do well to consider Point #10 of “Short Reasons for Cremation,” a 12-point pamphlet circulated in Australia at the turn of the century: Cremation eliminates all danger of being buried alive.

History does record some instances of deliberate live burial. It was a method of execution employed in Roman times for vestal virgins who broke their vows of chastity, and some medieval monks and nuns were also thus punished for the same crime. Plutarch described the process for vestal virgins:

... a narrow room is constructed, to which a descent is made by stairs; here they prepare a bed, and light a lamp, and leave a small quantity of victuals, such as bread and water, a pail of milk, and some oil; so that body which had been consecrated and devoted to the most sacred service of religion might not be said to perish by such a death as famine. The culprit herself is put in a litter, which they cover over, and tie her down with cords on it, so that nothing she utters may be heard. They then take her to the Forum... When they come to the place of execution, the officers loose the cords, and then the high priest, lifting his hands to heaven, pronounces certains prayers to himself before the act; then he brings out the prisoner, being still covered, and placing her upon the steps that lead down to the cell, turns away his face ... the stairs are drawn up after she has gone down, and a quantity of earth is heaped up over the entrance to the cell ... This is the punishment of those who break their vows of virginity.

Medieval monks and nuns who broke their vows of chastity were often walled into small niches, just barely large enough for their bodies. They also were given a pittance of food and water, and the grim benediction Vade in Pacem (Depart in Peace).

Some have been buried alive to serve the dead in the next life. In Africa, for example, two live slaves (a man and a woman) were interred with each dead Wadoe headman. The man was given a bill-hook to use to cut wood for fuel in the next life, and the woman cradled the dead chief’s head in her lap. In 1849, an observer at the funeral of King Thien Tri of Cochin, China, reported that along with rich and plentiful grave goods, all of the king’s childless wives were entombed with his body, thus guaranteeing he’d be henpecked throughout eternity but would at least get his meals on time.

[see also HolwickID #7116]

from www.snopes.com · Barbara Mikkelson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database funeralresurrection

Try Convincing People You're Not Dead

Acts 25:19

In February 1708 a previously unknown London astrologer named Isaac Bickerstaff published an almanac in which he predicted the death by fever of the famous rival astrologer John Partridge. According to Bickerstaff, Partridge would die on March 29 of that year. Partridge indignantly denied the prediction, but on March 30 Bickerstaff released a pamphlet announcing that he had been correct: Partridge was dead.

It took a day for the news to settle in, but soon everyone had heard of the astrologer's demise. On April 1, April Fool's Day, Partridge was woken by a sexton outside his window who wanted to know if there were any orders for his funeral sermon. Then, as Partridge walked down the street, people stared at him as if they were looking at a ghost or stopped to tell him that he looked exactly like someone they knew who was dead. As hard as he tried, Partridge couldn't convince people that he wasn't dead.

Bickerstaff, it turned out, was a pseudonym for the great satirist Jonathan Swift. His prognosticatory practical joke upon Partridge worked so well that the astrologer finally was forced to stop publishing his almanacs, because he couldn't shake his reputation as the man whose death had been foretold.

Starting From An Empty Tomb

Romans 8

In the wake of Easter, I am left wondering what just happened. In a way, Easter is the most natural day of the year for a Christian. We live in the reality that we serve a resurrected Lord; Easter is the day of the year when we are most likely to remember this. But oddly enough, Easter sometimes feels more like an anomaly in the Christian life. Oh yes, we remember, this is the core of our faith. This is the basis on which everything else rests. How did I lose sight of it? I ask myself.

In our day-to-day, twenty-first-century lives, we don't talk about resurrection. The subject only comes up at Easter or when a believer dies. For most people in the world (including, I'm sorry to say, some professing Christians), the death and resurrection of Jesus seems like an extraneous event of history. Jesus rose from the dead, and Hannibal crossed the Alps. Both were significant events at the time, but have little to do with us.

In the book THE GOSPEL IN A PLURALIST SOCIETY, Lesslie Newbigin observes, “It is obvious that the story of the empty tomb cannot be fitted into our contemporary worldview, or indeed into any worldview except one of which it is the starting point.” You can't have Buddha and an empty tomb; you can't have Western Imperialism and an empty tomb; you can't have an innocuous Jesus and an empty tomb. Many have tried to fit these things together as a puzzle, but the power of the empty tomb repels anything that competes with it.

Easter is a reminder to me that, in the course of each year, my worldview has a tendency to get rearranged. I get lost in details and ideas that seem relevant to my life. But there is nothing more relevant to any human soul than the resurrection of Jesus Christ, and there is no more suitable foundation on which to build a life. Christ's resurrection offers the promise that we, too, will be raised from the dead. But also, as the apostle Paul assures us repeatedly in his writings, the same power that raised Christ from the dead is also working in us to accomplish all that God desires (see, for example, Romans 8 and Ephesians 1). The resurrection of Christ changed everything, and there is no going back. Once the sun has begun to rise, it will not reverse its course.

Today would be a good day to take stock of your worldview. (I'm not merely referring to your theological and philosophical convictions; our worldviews encompass the smallest bits of our lives as well as the biggest.) What does the empty tomb have to do with you? Is it an accessory to your life or is it essential? What does God desire to do in your life with that same power that raised Jesus Christ from the dead? Allow the mystery of Easter to turn your life right side up and remind you of the foundation upon which your hope is built.

________

Copyright © 2005 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

Good News! Jesus Lives!

Acts 17:18

Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoicks, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? other some, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection. (Acts 17:18 AV)

Now that is our message. If anyone is married how rapidly we tell it. If there is a birth, how they spread the news. If death has visited, we tell it. The most timid person in the world can report these things. And that same person has ability to report the tremendous fact that Jesus is not dead but alive. Oh, people have read it in a book, but let one go from the presence of God — nay, rather carry the presence of God with him, and go everywhere telling the story. You say, “but I don’t know how to begin.” Here is how to begin: “the crucified One is alive.” Tell everyone. – T. T. Shields (former Pastor of Jarvis Street Baptist Church, Toronto)

‘Tis a truth: away and spread it;

Spread the tidings far and near;

O may sinners give it credit,

And be joyful when they hear,

“The Lord is risen.” — alt.

from Old Devotional Calendar (1960's) · T. T. Shields via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database testimonywitness

What About Cremation?

Job 30:19

In a week when I read about author Hunter Thompson’s ashes being shot out of a cannon in Colorado, when my classical philosophy class at Southern Seminary read through Plato’s Phaedo (where Socrates shows the greatest disrespect for the body), and when, preaching through Genesis, I came to chapter 50, which concerns the remains of Jacob and Joseph, I couldn’t help but think of cremation.

Nationwide, one-fourth of the dead are cremated, and that percentage is much higher in some states, such as Colorado, where it is 50 percent. What is one to think when a loved one says they prefer it?

The arguments given for cremation include the following:

1. It’s less expensive, roughly one-fifth the cost of the traditional

funeral.

2. It takes up less space.

3. The remains and their fortunes aren’t as “yucky.”

Furthermore, the Bible doesn’t prohibit it, and it won’t be a hindrance to resurrection. God can reconstitute your body wherever, whenever and however He pleases.

Still, I lean toward a traditional burial. Let me offer 10 reasons:

• It shows peculiar reverence for the body. In the first century, many thought the body was vile, but Jesus became incarnate, to the consternation of Gnostics and their fellow travelers. In our century, the culture adores the body, spending billions for fitness club memberships, flattering fashions, cosmetic surgery, manicures and such. But there is little appreciation for bodies “past their prime,” for bodies broken by disease or accident. But loved ones cannot help but cherish the last touch of a wrinkled hand, with liver spots and veins ruptured by multiple IV punctures. Here was a body which bore you in its womb, which nursed you, which held you it its arms when you were struck with fever. It was a body whose face, limbs and stature were a comfort to you, not as so much “sand,” but as a creature in human form. And it is in that fo€LVAL Xretrieval of bodies, whether under the fire of combat or in the archaeologist-like search for bones at decades-old airplane crash sites, reflects this concern for more than tokens of the departed. Interest in wakes, visitations, vaults, embalming, and ossuaries seems to be a natural outworking of a fundamental human interest macro-preservation. Perhaps it is a sad attempt to deny the reality of death, but it is just as likely a function of reverence for these “jars of clay.”

• It tweaks the environmental extremists. Much environmentalist literature disparages “anthropomorphism,” the elevation of mankind above the rest of nature. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) calls Thanksgiving “Holocaust on a Plate,” comparing the slaughter of turkeys to the slaughter of Jews in Auschwitz. Zero Population Growth (ZPG) fanatics try to intimidate those who would presume to “clutter” and “choke” the world with more than two kids. For one thing, all 6.5 billion people in the world could stand together within the city limits of Houston, Texas. We’ve got room for more people. But, of course, you need more space for burial. Still, it’s not that daunting. Providing a generous nine-foot by six-foot plot for each person, all of Illinois’ 12.5 million residents could be buried in about 25 square miles, or about a square quarter mile in each of the state’s 102 counties. We can manage, thank-you.

• It magnifies cemeteries. Not only do cemeteries testify to man’s mortality -- a useful message in a world disinclined to contemplate such sobering truth -- but they also serve as a rich cultural and spiritual resource. If scattered ashes, mantle urns, or tiny plots were the norm, then one would miss such stirring experiences as a visit to the graves of Southern Baptist greats in Louisville’s Cave Hill Cemetery –- John Broadus, J. M. Frost, and A. T. Robertson.

• It can serve archaeology and forensics. Scientists and historians are indebted to those who have chosen traditional burial.

Please don’t think this is an ad for funeral directors and cemetery developers. While many are honorable and helpful, others are predatory, exploiting the vulnerability of grieving families. The explosion of interest in cremation and do-it-yourself burials is in large measure a reaction to the funeral industry’s cost racketeers. But the issues are separable, and the point stands: The traditional burial has much to recommend it.

Jesus Is Present Tense

There is a mausoleum with a crystal coffin. Millions go by that coffin every year. And on that coffin, there is an inscription and the inscription goes like this, “He was the greatest leader of all people, of all kind. He was the lord of the new humanity. He was the savior of the world.” That tomb, that mausoleum, that coffin — and when you look at the man, the embalming is done so perfectly that you can see the hairs on his fingers.

That tomb is found in Red Square, Moscow; it’s Lenin. Interestingly enough, the whole inscription is in the past tense: He was; he was; and he was. Somewhere between two-fifths of the people of the world believe that statement: what Lenin subscribed as the answer to the things of this world, they agree with.[1] Two-fifths either agree with it or is under an enslavement of those who believe that Lenin was the answer. Some people will say, three-fifths of the world, a majority of the people of this world. What a contrast to Jesus Christ who says, “I am the resurrection and the life. He that believeth in Me, though he were dead yet shall he live.” Nothing in the past tense.

________

[1] This may have been true in 1985, but no longer!

from Kerux Sermon #22025 by Dr. James M. Baird via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrectioneternal life

The Body of Christ

Acts 1:3

The question caught me a bit off guard. I am used to being asked to defend and explain my theology. But this something was different. I had been talking to someone about some old fears, explaining that what had helped me to move past them was largely due to faith that gave me hope in a world beyond them. His response pulled me down from my seemingly ascended place. “What is your theology of the body?” he asked. “How does God speak to your physical existence right now?” I didn’t know how to respond.

It isn’t a matter we often consider. What does it mean that Christ came in the flesh, with sinew and marrow? What does it mean that he lived and breathed, died, and was raised as a body? Perhaps more importantly, what does it mean that the risen Christ today, as a corporal being, is ascended and sitting at the right hand of the Father in heaven? What does Christ’s wounded body have to do with our own? What of his ascended body?

The modern divorce of the spiritual and the physical, heaven and earth, what is now and what will be, have made these difficult questions to consider. But the promise of the Christian is union with none other than Christ himself. In faith and by the Spirit, we are united to the same body that was on the cross and in the tomb, which is now also in heaven. We are united with a body who is very much a living, immense, and physical promise. “Since death came through a human being, the resurrection of the dead has also come through a human being; for as all die in Adam, so all will be made alive in Christ” (1 Corinthians 15:21-22).

The biblical depiction of salvation and sanctification is far more earthy than we often entertain. No matter how privatized, removed, or other-worldly we might describe Christianity, it is unavoidably a faith that intends us to encounter and experience both king and kingdom in the here-and-now, everyday, hand-dirtying occurrence of life.

In an unapologetically corporeal account, the book of Acts describes the risen Christ among his disciples: “After his suffering he presented himself alive to them by many convincing proofs, appearing to them during forty days and speaking about the kingdom of God. While eating with them, he ordered them not to leave Jerusalem, but to wait there for the promise of the Father... And when he had said this, as they were watching, he was lifted up, and a cloud took him out of their sight” (Acts 1:3-4). When the two men in white robes interrupted the disciples’ stupor, their question was pointed: “Why do you stand looking up toward heaven? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you, will return in the same way as you saw him go forth” (Acts 1:11).

It is no small promise that Christ came as a body, was wounded as a body, and now sits as a real and living body in heaven, until the day he will return and wipe every tear from our eyes. The ascended body of Christ represents something more fully human, more real than ourselves, and it is this reality he lifts us toward, transforms us into, and advocates on our behalf. Our union with Christ and communion with the Trinity add a certain and heavenly dimension to our lives; and it is indeed one that correctly and profoundly orients us here and now, in real bodies, to the world around us.

How does God speak to your physical existence? Here in these weeks from Easter to Pentecost, consider in your answer the Christ who walked among the world as a risen body, who invited Thomas to physically put his hands in scars that still mark pain, who ascended as one fully human after sharing a meal with those he loved. Consider the body of Christ, who now sits at the right hand of the Father as your advocate, offering his body for the sake of yours.

________

Copyright © 2008 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

[Original illustration at this number was added to HolwickID #28717]

A Living Saviour!

Acts 2:23

Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain: Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it. (Acts 2:23-24 AV)

A small Norwegian vessel lay in an English port for several days. One of those days happened to be Good Friday, and the chief officer carelessly said to the captain, "Shall I hoist the flag at half mast today?"

"Why?" said the captain.

"Well," replied the officer, "They say Jesus died today."

The captain who was a Christian man replied, "Jesus, who is my Saviour, is a living Saviour, not a dead One; and if you put out the flag at all, you must hoist it right at the top of the mast."

Do you know the Lord Jesus as a risen Saviour? The stone which was sealed upon His sepulchre has been forever rolled away. The grave is empty. Jesus is risen – a mighty, triumphant victor.

Death could not keep its prey–

He tore the bars away,

Jesus my Lord.

from Old Devotional Calendar (1960's) · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database easter

Paul Before the Sanhedrin

Acts 22:22

Acts 22:22–23:10 — Paul Before the Sanhedrin (outline by F. F. Bruce, NICNT) « Leader information shown in this fashion »

{A.} The Birth of the Church (1:1–5:42)

{B.} Persecution and Expansion (6:1–9:31)

{C.} The Acts of Peter & Beginnings of Gentile Christianity (9:32-12:25)

{D.} Church Extension from Antioch & Apostolic Decree at Jerusalem (12:25–15:35)

{E.} Paul Leaves Antioch & Moves to the Aegean World (15:36–19:20)

{F.} Paul Plans to Visit Rome and Gets there by an Unforseen Route (19:21–28:31)

{1} He Prepares to Leave Ephesus for Macedonia and Achaia (19:21–20:6)

{2} The Journey to Jerusalem (20:7–21:16)

{3} Paul at Jerusalem (21:17–23:30)

A. Meeting with James and the Elders (21:17–26)

B. Riot in the Temple (21:27–30)

C. Paul Rescued by the Romans (21:31-36)

D. Paul Obtains Leave to Address the Crowd (21:37-40)

E. Paul’s Defence to the People of Jerusalem (22:1-21)

1. His early days (22:1-5)

2. The Damascus Road (22:6-11)

3. Ananias of Damascus (22:12-16)

4. Paul’s Vision in the Temple (22:17-21)

Review:

Paul gave his testimony to the people of Jerusalem after the riot that took place in the temple « (thoughts from W. Griffith Thomas) »

i) How was his enmity shown? « – in his fierce and single-minded opposition and persecution against followers of the Way. »

ii) How was his enmity overcome? « – on the Damascus road by the appearance of the risen Lord he was converted. »

iii) How was his enmity transformed? « – God turned this opponent of the Way, the gospel of Jesus Christ, into its champion as an apostle to the Gentiles. »

Therefore,

i) If Paul’s testimony was true, what can we say about Paul’s conversion? « – that it was indeed true and incontrovertible. »

ii) If we can say this about his conversion,

a) then Christ’s resurrection « – is a reality »

b) and Christ’s resurrection (Romans 1:4, Philippians 3:10) « – was the centre and foundation of Paul’s message and ministry »

F. Paul Reveals His Roman Citizenship (22:22–29; NKJV): 22 And they listened to him until this word, and then they raised their voices and said, “Away with such a fellow from the earth, for he is not fit to live!” 23 Then, as they cried out and tore off their clothes and threw dust into the air, 24 the commander ordered him to be brought into the barracks, and said that he should be examined under scourging, so that he might know why they shouted so against him. 25 And as they bound him with thongs, Paul said to the centurion who stood by, “Is it lawful for you to scourge a man who is a Roman, and uncondemned?” 26 When the centurion heard that, he went and told the commander, saying, “Take care what you do, for this man is a Roman.” 27 Then the commander came and said to him, “Tell me, are you a Roman?” He said, “Yes.” 28 The commander answered, “With a large sum I obtained this citizenship.” And Paul said, “But I was born a citizen.” 29 Then immediately those who were about to examine him withdrew from him; and the commander was also afraid after he found out that he was a Roman, and because he had bound him.

1. What was the “word” that so aroused the Jew’s anger? « – Gentiles »

2. What made Paul, in their opinion, not fit to live (Deuteronomy 14:2) « – he was controverting the great principle of Israel as the chosen people of God, to preach the Messiah to the Gentiles »

3. What did they forget (Genesis 18:18, 22:18) « – Abraham’s blessing »

4. What was the purpose of the commander’s ordering him to be scourged? « – to examine (or question) him, the assumption was that this would get the truth from the prisoner »

5. What prevented this course of action? « – Roman citizens were legally exempt (Valerian & Porcian laws). This led to … »

G. Paul Brought before the Sanhedrin (22:30; NKJV): 30 The next day, because he wanted to know for certain why he was accused by the Jews, he released him from his bonds, and commanded the chief priests and all their council to appear, and brought Paul down and set him before them.

1. Who initiated this assembly? « – the governor which is important to follow what happened. »

H. Paul before the Sanhedrin (23:1–10)

1. Interchange with the high priest (23:1–5; NKJV): 1 Then Paul, looking earnestly at the council, said, “Men and brethren, I have lived in all good conscience before God until this day.” 2 And the high priest Ananias commanded those who stood by him to strike him on the mouth. 3 Then Paul said to him, “God will strike you, you whitewashed wall! For you sit to judge me according to the law, and do you command me to be struck contrary to the law?” 4 And those who stood by said, “Do you revile God’s high priest?” 5 Then Paul said, “I did not know, brethren, that he was the high priest; for it is written, ‘You shall not speak evil of a ruler of your people.’” – Exodus 22:28

a. What was it that angered Ananias? « – Paul’s continuing claim to innocence before God (note the distinction from spiritual justification, Philippians 3:9, 1 Corinthians 4:4). »

b. “Whitewashed wall” – see Matthew 23:27, Ezekiel 13:10-12; what do you think were the implications of this statement? « – that Ananias acted falsely in his role on the Sanhedrin »

c. Was Paul’s attitude Christ-like (John 18:21–23)? « – Discuss; in fact Paul’s words were predictive, rather than imprecative. »

d. “I did not know … “ – various explanations of the statement:

i. Paul’s assumed poor eyesight

ii. They were called by the Roman commander, and so Ananias was not in his place or robes of office

iii. Ananias, appointed high priest, AD 47–59, by Herod of Chalcis, may not have fully qualified for that office

iv. Ananias actions here were inconsistent with that office, so that Paul was speaking ironically « . John 7:51 is a brief summary of how the Law was applied, with due care and truthful witnesses. Of Annanias, Josephus, Antiq. Bk 20 Ch 9 ¶2 (§206) may describe his rapaciousness. »

e. Whither was Paul’s apology directed? « – not to the person, but to the office; so it is with Titus 3:1, Romans 13:1-5 »

f. Ananias was assassinated in AD 66, by Jewish patriots who considered him and his family as being Roman pawns.

2. The resurrection hope (23:6–10; NKJV): 6 But when Paul perceived that one part were Sadducees and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, “Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee; concerning the hope and resurrection of the dead I am being judged!” 7 And when he had said this, a dissension arose between the Pharisees and the Sadducees; and the assembly was divided. 8 For Sadducees say that there is no resurrection – and no angel or spirit; but the Pharisees confess both. 9 Then there arose a loud outcry. And the scribes of the Pharisees’ party arose and protested, saying, “We find no evil in this man; but if a spirit or an angel has spoken to him, let us not fight against God.” 10 Now when there arose a great dissension, the commander, fearing lest Paul might be pulled to pieces by them, commanded the soldiers to go down and take him by force from among them, and bring him into the barracks.

a. With which party of the Sanhedrin was Paul associated? « – the Pharisees; this is consistent with his speech to the people.

»

b. The Sadducees, of whom the High Priests were usually part, had a materialistic viewpoint and were the most prominent in the secular rule of the country. They claimed to be the orthodox, relying only on the Torah. In what did they not believe? … was this consistent with the Torah (Genesis 3:24, 19:1, Numbers 16:22)? « – they did not believe in angels or spirits; they interpreted such passages to conform to their own position »

c. How was the resurrection connected with the hope of Israel on a national basis (Ezekiel 36:24, 37:11-14)? « – only by rising from the dead could true Israel of the past behold the promised reign of their Messiah »

d. Was it valid for Paul to split the opposition on the question of the resurrection? … why or why not? « – yes, it was; Paul has already noted the he is a Pharisee; and Pharisees could, without conflict with their tenets, become Christians but such was not the case with Sadducees. As also we have seen, the resurrection is key to the Messianic gospel message »

e. What were the Pharisees willing to admit? « – that God may have further revelation beyond Moses; so they were more open to accepting the truth of this Way of Jesus as Christ »

from Sunday Bible School · Garth Hutchinson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Resurrection: History Or Hoax?

John 8:58

Let’s begin with some sarcasm. If Dan Brown (author of the “The Da Vinci Code”) hadn’t appeared, we poor Christians never would have known the “real story” concerning the life, death and supposed resurrection of Jesus Christ. Here’s the scoop according to Brown and like-minded authors (such as Bart Ehrman, John Dominic Crossan and Elaine Pagels): The real story of Jesus has been cloaked by time, inaccurate history, church conspiracies and secret societies.

And what are the “newly discovered, long-hidden truths” about Jesus of Nazareth that we have not been privy to? Here’s a short list: He was married to Mary Magdalene, sired children who subsequently fled to France, never claimed to be God, conspired with Judas in betrayal and was crucified but not bodily raised from the dead.

What these liberal revisionists leave us with is a religious radical who happened to compile a body of moral teachings and had the good fortune of garnering a large following that believed the ridiculous notions of his divinity, spiritual authority, miracles, sacrificial death for sinners and his resurrection from the dead.

What are we to think about the gospel of Judas, secret codes, etc.?

Here’s what we can know about Jesus Christ. First, the most reliable sources of history concerning the life and ministry of Jesus are the four gospels. Why? It is because we have more reliable documents that affirm the veracity of the Gospels than almost any known ancient document. Either an eyewitness apostle wrote the entire New Testament or a close associate of an apostle, meaning that the information we have in the Gospels is first-generation information. This is unlike the second- and third-generation Gnostic writings purporting to be gospels that arose from attempts to skew the story of Jesus already affirmed by the early church.

What about Jesus’ claim to be God? Were these redactions of later Christians, or were they legitimate claims?

Jesus did claim to be God. In John 8:58 Jesus said, “I tell you the truth, before Abraham was born, I Am.” For Jesus to use that little phrase “I Am” is a direct reference to Exodus 3:14, where God gave Moses His identity card for Pharaoh’s consideration. To claim to be ‘I Am’ was a direct correlation to claiming to be God. And this is just one example of Jesus’ divine claims.

Was Jesus bodily raised from the dead, or was it merely the dispirited egos of the disciples that were raised from the deadness of depression after Jesus’ death? Does it matter? Yes, God raised Jesus from the dead and it does matter.

The Apostle Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 15:17, “And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins.” He added in verse 19, “If only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are to be pitied more than all men.” So, it does matter. If Jesus did not conquer death, we remain under the curse of sin and are to be pitied for believing such a thing.

Jesus was God, said God-like things and performed many miracles. He was betrayed by Judas, abandoned by His followers, crucified by all sinners. Further, he was raised from the dead and appeared to many. He ascended to the Father where He now intercedes for sinners. Praise His name. He rules and reigns. He is RISEN!

________

Kevin Shrum is pastor of Inglewood Baptist Church in Nashville, Tennessee.

Worshiping Weirdness?

Luke 24:9

Easter Sermon Luke 24:9-15, 2 Timothy 4:3-4

WORSHIPING WEIRDNESS?

=====================

I. Everyone loves weird religious news.

II. Judas Gospel - you've got Jesus' betrayer all wrong.

A. Is Judas really the hero of the Easter story?

B. The New Age movement is nothing New.

C. The secret heresy of the Gospel of Judas.

D. Hook, line and sinker.

III. Da Vinci Code - you've got salvation all wrong.

A. Hugely popular book and soon to be a movie.

B. Far-out story.

C. Ignorance of the Bible drives this weirdness.

IV. Scientology - you've got mental health all wrong.

A. "South Park" brouhaha, and Tom Cruise.

B. The home-made religion of a science fiction writer.

V. Mormonism - you've got American history all wrong.

A. Their distinctive history and theology.

B. Where it all falls apart.

VI. Isn't Easter weird as well?

A. You can make a strong case.

B. Do we believe it only because we WANT it to be true?

C. The only possible defense.

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, Serm06k.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrection

Eastertide Enigma

Acts 2:41

The influx of Christian disciples after the crucifixion of Jesus is an enigma. That the number of followers continued to grow despite intense opposition and brutal persecution, despite the absence of their leader, is inexplicable. Or, in the words of Cambridge professor C.F.D. Moule, it is a mystery that “rips a great hole in history, a hole the size and shape of the Resurrection.” New Testament writers take us to the beginning glimpses of that great hole, the reverberations of the first Easter Sunday.

In the book of Acts, Luke describes a scene whereby the enigma of Christianity was called into the courts of the Sanhedrin. At this juncture, the high priest was filled with rage. Jesus was no longer among them, but the disciples continued to fill Jerusalem with his teaching. He had strictly charged the apostles not to teach in the name of Jesus, and yet they continued preaching to crowds and healing the sick. Multitudes were professing belief in Christ. So the high priest had the disciples all arrested. Setting them before the council, he questioned them harshly. The disciple named Peter answered exactly as he preached: “We must obey God rather than men! The God of our fathers raised Jesus... exalting him at his right hand as Leader and Savior, to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins. And we are witnesses to these things and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God has given to those who obey him” (Acts 5:29-32).

At his words, the council was enraged, and some of them wanted the disciples put to death. But a Pharisee named Gamaliel, a teacher of the law held in honor by all the people, stood up to speak, first instructing that the apostles be led out of the room. And he said to them, “Men of Israel, take care what you are about to do with these men” (5:35).

Gamaliel's words introduce a logic often overlooked; he reminded them that this had happened before. He reminded them to look at history. “Before these days Theudas rose up,” he countered, “claiming to be somebody, and about four hundred men even joined him. But he was killed, and all who followed him were dispersed and came to nothing.” And after Theudas, Gamaliel warned, there were similar stories. “So in the present case I tell you, keep away from these men and let them alone, for if this plan or this undertaking is of man, it will fail; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them. You might even be found opposing God!” (5:38-39).

Though the growth of the Church alone is not enough to conclude the truth of Christ's resurrection, it is evidence that would be irresponsible to ignore. The apostles were aware that the message of the Cross is foolishness to some and a stumbling block to others. Yet they made choices to continue preaching despite the orders of the high priest and the often-severe persecution they faced. They changed social and religious practices that had been followed for centuries. They refused to give in; they would not be overthrown.

The rapid rise of Christian followers after the offensive death of their leader fails to make sense outside of the explanation the church itself offers: they were witnesses of these altogether unfathomable events. The message the disciples preached throughout the nations WAS TRUE: Jesus was crucified, dead, and buried. Christ was raised and death was stopped. The apostles were witnesses of God's power, and went to their deaths proclaiming it. They chose to obey God rather than man, and found Him building a Church that would reach far beyond them. The events of the first Easter left an enigmatic hole in history, a hole the size and shape of the Resurrection. With what explanation will you attempt to fill it?

________

Copyright © 2006 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

Accusation and Defense Before Felix

Acts 23:31

Acts 23:31–24:21 — Accusation and Defence Before Felix (outline by F. F. Bruce, NICNT) « Leader information shown in this fashion »

{A.} The Birth of the Church (1:1–5:42)

{B.} Persecution and Expansion (6:1–9:31)

{C.} The Acts of Peter & Beginnings of Gentile Christianity (9:32-12:25)

{D.} Church Extension from Antioch & Apostolic Decree at Jerusalem (12:25–15:35)

{E.} Paul Leaves Antioch & Moves to the Aegean World (15:36–19:20)

{F.} Paul Plans to Visit Rome and Gets there by an Unforseen Route (19:21–28:31)

{1} He Prepares to Leave Ephesus for Macedonia and Achaia (19:21–20:6)

{2} The Journey to Jerusalem (20:7–21:16)

{3} Paul at Jerusalem (21:17–23:30)

A. Meeting with James and the Elders (21:17–26)

B. Riot in the Temple (21:27–30)

C. Paul Rescued by the Romans (21:31-36)

D. Paul Obtains Leave to Address the Crowd (21:37-40)

E. Paul’s Defence to the People of Jerusalem (22:1-21)

F. Paul Reveals His Roman Citizenship (22:22-29)

G. Paul Brought before the Sanhedrin (22:30)

H. Paul Before the Sanhedrin (23:1-10)

I. The Lord Appears to Paul by Night (23:11)

J. Plot Against Paul’s Life (23:12–15)

K. The Plot Revealed (23:16–22)

L. The Tribune Prepares to Send Paul to Caesarea (23:23–24)

M. Letter from the Tribune to Felix (23:25–30)

{4} Paul at Caesarea Acts 23:31–26:32

A. Paul Taken to Caesarea (23:31–35; NKJV): 31 Then the soldiers, as they were commanded, took Paul and brought him by night to Antipatris. 32 The next day they left the horsemen to go on with him, and returned to the barracks. 33 When they came to Caesarea and had delivered the letter to the governor, they also presented Paul to him. 34 And when the governor had read it, he asked what province he was from. And when he understood that he was from Cilicia, 35 he said, ‘I will hear you when your accusers also have come.’ And he commanded him to be kept in Herod’s Praetorium.

1. Antipatris, named after Herod the Great’s father, Antipater, was about 55 km from Jerusalem, down on the coastal plain and about 45 km from Caesarea; why could the infantry return? « – the assassins were in Jerusalem expecting Paul there not a night’s forced march away; the 70 cavalry could cover the remaining ground quickly and give adequate protection »

2. Why the question of Paul’s home province? « – jurisdictional (just like Pilate sent Jesus to Herod Antipas when he learned that Jesus was from Galilee, Luke 23:6–12); Felix, procurator of Judaea, answered to the governor os Syria, also over Cilicia »

3. In what way does Felix show Roman justice to be fairer than that practised by the Jewish rulers? « – he would make no conclusion without hearing the accusers as the letter also said »

4. Paul is detained in the palace built by Herod the Great; how does his status appear to you? « – still accorded Roman honour »

B. Paul Accused before Felix (24:1–9; NKJV): 1 Now after five days Ananias the high priest came down with the elders and a certain orator named Tertullus. These gave evidence to the governor against Paul. 2 And when he was called upon, Tertullus began his accusation, saying: ‘Seeing that through you we enjoy great peace, and prosperity is being brought to this nation by your foresight, 3 we accept it always and in all places, most noble Felix, with all thankfulness. 4 Nevertheless, not to be tedious to you any further, I beg you to hear, by your courtesy, a few words from us. 5 For we have found this man a plague, a creator of dissension among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes. 6 He even tried to profane the temple, and we seized him, and wanted to judge him according to our law. 7 But the commander Lysias came by and with great violence took him out of our hands, 8 commanding his accusers to come to you. By examining him yourself you may ascertain all these things of which we accuse him.’ 9 And the Jews also assented, maintaining that these things were so.

1. What can we surmise about Tertullus’ profession? « – he was a kind of lawyer or lobbyist who would bring representations to the Roman rulers; maybe Jewish with Greek / Roman training »

2. In general terms, how does Tertullus open his case? « — with flattery about Felix’ rule. »

a. … what words in particular « – peace, prosperity (reforms), foresight (providence), noble (clement), thankfulness (gratitude) – yes, he brought the peace of enforcement! »

b. … were these true? « – no; there were frequent riots, which Felix was ruthless in stamping out problems with the Jews; see Josephus, Antiquities, XX.viii.5, for example »

3. What were the specific accusations made against Paul:

a. P________ « lague; pest, pestilence – a generality, a slur on Paul’s character »

b. A creator of D___________ « issension; trouble-maker, one causing Jewish insurrections (which was a Felix problem) »

c. A ring-leader of the N____________ « azarenes, here drawn as being an illegal sect rather than a part of Judaism »

d. One who tried to P__________ « rofane » the T________ « emple; note the subtle change in the accusation from Acts 21:28; from a factual item to a motive, one impossible to prove or to disprove »

4. How does Tertullus seek to discredit any information sent by Claudius Lysias?

a. By saying the Jews were « — judging Paul in a legal manner »

b. By accusing Lysias of « – wrongful violence against their legal assembly (perhaps Lysias’ letter overstated his own role just to offset this probably accusation by the Jews) »

c. By saying that Lysias needed « – summoning to answer to Felix respecting Paul or Lysias’ conduct; which is uncertain »

5. And all the accompanying Jews chorused … « Amen! »

C. Paul’s Defence before Felix (24:10-21; NKJV): 10 Then Paul, after the governor had nodded to him to speak, answered: ‘Inasmuch as I know that you have been for many years a judge of this nation, I do the more cheerfully answer for myself, 11 because you may ascertain that it is no more than twelve days since I went up to Jerusalem to worship. 12 And they neither found me in the temple disputing with anyone nor inciting the crowd, either in the synagogues or in the city. 13 Nor can they prove the things of which they now accuse me. 14 But this I confess to you, that according to the Way which they call a sect, so I worship the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the Law and in the Prophets. 15 I have hope in God, which they themselves also accept, that there will be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and the unjust. 16 This being so, I myself always strive to have a conscience without offense toward God and men. 17 Now after many years I came to bring alms and offerings to my nation, 18 in the midst of which some Jews from Asia found me purified in the temple, neither with a mob nor with tumult. 19 They ought to have been here before you to object if they had anything against me. 20 Or else let those who are here themselves say if they found any wrongdoing in me while I stood before the council, 21 unless it is for this one statement which I cried out, standing among them, “Concerning the resurrection of the dead I am being judged by you this day.”’

1. In place of ‘nauseating flattery’ how does Paul show respect:

a. He notes Felix’ « – experience as a judge of Jewish matters »

b. He says that Felix has the « – power to determine the truth »

2. How does Paul answer the various charges levelled at him (Paul’s entire speech answers the first, which was not a legal charge at all, but a character assassination) …

a. … of being a creator of dissension? « – there are 12 days (5 spent in Roman custody) which can readily be examined and in which Paul has neither spent in public debate nor in haranguing the people against either the Jewish or Roman authorities; they cannot prove these charges. »

b. … of forming a new, illegal sect? « – he practised a worship of God and held to a set of teaching founded upon the whole Scriptures, a central, Jewish position (even if the High Priest and Sadducees might deny it) the same as those accusing him, and seeking to live in such a fashion that was innocent before God and men. »

c. … desecrating the temple? « – his presence in the temple, contrary to their charge, was not to pollute it but rather to worship; to worship, moreover, in keeping with Jewish practise by being first cleansed and then in the giving of both alms and offerings; when he was found there in the temple, he had been purified, and he was not with a mob nor was he causing any disorder in that holy place. »

3. How does Paul offset Tertullus’ innuendo concerning Lysias? « – it is not Lysias, but rather the Jews from Asia, the original instigators of the charges against Paul, that should be here to bear witness to their charges, if they could, in this court. The absence of such witnesses favours Paul’s defence. »

4. Why might Paul not describe more fully the alms that he had brought to Jerusalem? « – neither their source, coming from the Gentiles in Asia and Greece; nor their destination, headed to the Jerusalem church rather than the temple, would bring any particular favour among his accusers. »

5. Read 1 Corinthians 15:20–23, Philippians 3:20–21, Daniel 12:2 – this is unique from Paul describing « – the general resurrection, for he usually focuses upon the resurrection of believers »

6. Why is it important to us to follow Paul in holding that our faith, Christianity, is not something which began in A.D. 30 with the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. « – discuss; note Messianic prophecy; Christianity consistent with, consummates covenants to Abraham and following »

from Sunday Bible School · Garth Hutchinson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Did Christianity 'Borrow' From Other Religions?

Acts 20:7

I recall reading in 1988 of an ancient religion older than Christianity in which a pagan deity was said to have been crucified between two thieves, wore a crown of thorns while on the cross, was regarded by his followers to be the good shepherd and savior of the world, and then rose from the dead three days later. The story shocked me. The details were too similar to have been a coincidence. Had Christianity copied from another religion?

In “The Da Vinci Code,” author Dan Brown claims that Christianity borrowed extensively from pagan religions. Nothing in Christianity is original, he says. The pre-Christian god Mithras -- called the son of god and the light of the world -- was born on Dec. 25, died, was buried in a rock tomb, and then resurrected in three days, Brown tells us.

Even Christianity’s weekly holy day was stolen from the pagans, we're told. “Originally,” Da Vinci Code character Robert Langdon says, “Christianity honored the Jewish Sabbath of Saturday, but Constantine shifted it to coincide with the pagan’s veneration day of the sun. To this day, most churchgoers attend services on Sunday morning with no idea that they are there on account of the pagan sun god’s weekly tribute -- Sunday.”

Can we find any truth in what Brown claims? Did Christianity borrow from other religions? Let’s take a look.

In 1988 I discovered after further review that there are indeed claims of dying and rising gods in other religions -- some of which are very similar to the Christian records. What is of great interest is that every single one of those accounts postdate Jesus by more than 100 years! While in a number of instances the religion in which the dying and rising god appears predates Jesus, the account itself, where we find the dying and rising god, postdates Jesus. It appears that it was these other religions that were influenced by Christianity rather than the other way around. A prime example is Brown’s mention of Mithras. The religion of Mithras predates Christianity. But we do not have an early report of Mithras with all of the details mentioned by Brown. I am unaware of any account, even a late one, of a Mithras who dies, is buried in a rock tomb, then resurrected in three days.

T.N.D. Mettinger is a senior Swedish scholar who has written what is perhaps the most recent academic treatment of dying and rising gods in antiquity. He states that the scholarly consensus is that none of these pre-date Christianity and that the few who think differently are viewed as an “almost extinct species.” Although Mettinger himself admits to going against the consensus, believing there are as many as five pre-Christian accounts of dying and rising gods, he admits that two of the five are uncertain. Of the remaining three, one is said to live again but is never seen by anyone including the gods, while another appears in a report that is unclear. According to Mettinger, only one clear account of a dying and rising god predates Christianity. However, he adds that this account is so different from the Christian account that no parallel can be said to exist.

In summary, the consensus of today’s scholars agree that there are no pre-Christian accounts of dying and rising gods, and the most recent treatment of the subject is from a scholar who disagrees but adds that none are parallels to the resurrection of Jesus.

What about the day for Christian worship -- Sunday? Was the change from the Jewish Sabbath of Saturday to the Christian day of worship on Sunday the result of Constantine? This is quite impossible. Constantine lived in the fourth century and Christian worship on Sunday started long before then. For example, around A.D. 55 the Apostle Paul mentioned meeting on the “first day of the week” (1 Corinthians 16:2). Luke mentions a similar practice (Acts 20:7). These were written more than 200 years prior to Constantine’s birth!

Brown’s historical inaccuracy is stunning. So apparent is this to scholars that even the atheist New Testament scholar Bart Ehrman concludes, “[Brown’s] a novelist, not a scholar of history.... Even though he claims that his 'descriptions of ... documents ... are accurate,' in fact they are not.”

Some of Brown’s claims are easier than others for the layperson to answer. Although this is one of the more difficult to answer without further study, the above has been provided for you. And remember that your friends making the claim shoulder the responsibility of supporting it. Accordingly, anyone claiming that Christianity borrowed its major doctrines from pagan religions of its day shoulders the responsibility of supporting it, not just with a claim to the effect as Brown has done, but also by supplying references to the pre-Christian ancient writings which would lead to such a conclusion. Demand these references from your friend and take heart. They do not exist.

________

Licona is director of apologetics and interfaith evangelism at the North American Mission Board.

Death Interrupted

Luke 7:14

And he came and touched the bier: and they that bare him stood still. — Luke 7:14.

Only Christ can stop the procession of death. in the fifth chapter of Genesis we see the funeral march of the ages, as the names of the patriarchs are given, and following each name from Adam on, is the solemn statement, like the tolling of a funeral bell, “and he died.” The bell tolls six times and then misses a stroke when we read of Enoch “who was not, for God took him.” Some day perhaps much sooner than we think, Christ will come again, and the dead in Christ will rise first; then we believers, who are alive, shall be caught up, Enoch like, to meet the Lord in the air, and so shall we ever be with the Lord ; and again the funeral march to the grave will be interrupted. — G. M. Landis.

Oh, joy! oh, delight! should we go without dying,

No sickness, no sadness, no dread and no crying,

Caught up through the clouds with our Lord into glory,

When Jesus receives His own. H. L. Turner.

from Old Devotional Calendar Circa 1960's · G. M. Landis via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrection

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate