Menu

100 Sermon Illustrations on Good Friday

100 illustrations Page 1 of 2

Good Friday commemorates the crucifixion and sacrificial death of Jesus Christ, central to Christian redemption and atonement (Luke 23:26-56). Preachers often use vivid imagery of the cross, sacrifice, and the Lamb of God to illustrate themes of love, suffering, and victory through apparent defeat (John 19:16-30). It invites reflection on Jesus’ ultimate sacrifice and its profound spiritual significance.

Injustice On Display

Mark 10:45

Henri Nouwen tells the story of a family he knew in Paraguay. The father, a doctor, spoke out against the military there and its human rights abuses. Local police took their revenge by arresting his teenage son and torturing him to death. Townsfolk wanted to turn the funeral into a huge protest march. But the doctor chose another means of protest. The father displayed him in the church as he had found him in the jail. The son was naked, his body marked with scars from the electric shocks and cigarette burns and beatings. It did not lay in a coffin but on the blood-soaked mattress from the jail. It was the strongest protest imaginable, for it put injustice on grotesque display.

This is what happened on Good Friday. The Cross exposed the world for what it is: a breeding ground of violence and injustice. And that dark Friday can only be called Good because of what happened on Easter Sunday. Good Friday demolishes the instinctive belief that this life is supposed to be fair. But Easter gives a clue to the riddle. Someday, God will restore the physical reality of planet Earth to its proper place under his reign. The miracle of Easter will be enlarged to cosmic scale. It is a good thing to remember, when disappointment with God hits, that we live out our days on Easter Saturday.

===============

[version in Dynamic Preaching, Sept. 5, 1992]:

Some years ago, the gentle Catholic scholar, Henri Nouwen, was living in Paraguay. He knew a man in a certain town. The man was a doctor. And doctors are educated men, honorable men, a little better than the average person on the street. The military leaders in the district didn't like this doctor. They thought he was too uppity. So one night the police arrested his teenaged son. They locked him in a filthy jail cell. They beat him up. They tortured and abused him. They burned cigarettes into his skin. They shocked him with electric prods. And then they killed him. Violently.

The family prepared for the funeral. They wanted to wash the boy's body. They wanted to dress him in his best suit. They wanted to comb his hair, and lay him in a coffin of silk padding. They wanted to put a little smile on his face, and show him peaceful at the end. But the doctor said, NO! He dragged the bloody mattress from the jail and tossed it down at the front of the church. He left the body of his son twisted in torture. He didn't wash away the blood or the puss or the filth. And when the villagers filed by on the day of the funeral, they knew the doctor was one of them. They knew that he understood them. They knew that he was touched by their troubles and pained by their grief. And they knew that he would never stop fighting with them, until all the wickedness and all the corruption and all the rotten sinfulness in their world was put away forever. That day the doctor wore their face. They looked around at the funeral, and he was one of them.

from Christianity Today Magazine; article: Saturday Seven Days A Week · Philip Yancey via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database eastergood fridaycrucifixiondeath

Strength

In the spring of 1991, even before the brief coup in August, Soviet leader

Mikhail Gorbachev found his authority and leadership tested on all sides.

From Baltic states declaring their independence, to conservatives clamoring

for a return to old-line communism, to progressives pushing for more economic

reforms, the Soviet Union was a nation on the brink.

Things were coming to a head when demonstrators planned a massive march on

Thursday March 28 in Moscow itself to show their opposition to government

policy, hoping that 500,000 people would participate. The Kremlin banned

demonstrations, issued dire warnings against protestors, and promised a

massive show of force if the ban was defied. On everyone's mind was the

peaceful January demonstration in Lithuania that was crushed by Soviet tanks

and troops, in the process killing fourteen people.

On the day of the march, 50,000 troops and police crowded Moscow; 100,000

people ignored the ban and marched. Fortunately there were no clashes, but,

commenting on short-wave radio, a BBC correspondent described Gorbachev's show

of force as "a display of strength that showed considerable weakness."

The following day Christians worldwide celebrated Good Friday, the day when

Christ voluntarily went to the cross and allowed his own creation to torture

and kill him. A display of weakness that showed considerable strength. #1824

*

from Leadership · Greg Scharf, Fargo, North Dakota via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database strengthgood friday

But Where Is the Lamb?

Genesis 22:1

COMMUNITY GOOD FRIDAY SERVICE at Succasunna Presbyterian Church:

"BUT WHERE IS THE LAMB?" Genesis 22:1-11

I. Significance of Good Friday.

A. Far less popular than Christmas.

B. But spiritually there is no comparison.

C. Good Friday has a morbid air to it.

II. Good Friday deals with helplessness.

III. Many people feel helpless today.

A. Reasons for this feeling:

B. Being helpless goes against our strong, independent natures.

IV. Jesus was in the ultimate helpless situation.

A. The events of the week went steadily downhill.

B. Jesus chose to be helpless.

V. The cross was a victory in disguise.

A. The disciples did not recognize this till Easter Sunday.

B. No matter what happens to us in this life, we can be conquerors.

VI. Whether strong or weak, we need to place our trust in Jesus.

A. He sympathizes with us in our weakness and can help. Heb. 4:15

B. Even better, he forgives our sins and reconciles us to God.

C. Just as it worked out for Isaac, God will work it out for us.

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, Goodfr92.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crossovercome

Why Is Easter Unattractive?

John 1:29

[full text follows at end]

John Robinson, bishop of Woolwich, writes: "Most people would genuinely LIKE to believe the Christmas story, but wonder whether it CAN be true with the world as it is after nearly 2,000 years. But in the case of the Atonement, they ask with some impatience how anything done 2,000 years ago on the cross could 'affect me now.'" Good Friday and Easter are unattractive because the biblical view of God has been totally eclipsed. We use God as a tool at appropriate moments of need, like a Santa Claus. The Christian doctrine of the Atonement deals with the moral gulf between God and man. The biblical answer is the blood of Christ.

Theories of the Atonement:

1. "Christus Victor."

Jesus conquered the demonic forces. Good points, but inadequate.

2. Jesus as our example.

We live in imitation of Jesus. Also inadequate.

3. Love theory of the Atonement.

We love because he first loved us. Insufficient by itself, because it

provides no moral ground for the shedding of Christ's blood for our

salvation.

4. Substitutionary-satisfaction theory.

Has come under heavy fire in modern times. The Bible speaks of

Christ's death as a redemption and ransom for our deliverance from sin.

It enables a holy God to forgive us without detriment to his moral

nature. Problems: Is God a severe deity who has to be appeased? Did

God need to wait for Christ's death before he could love us? God has

always loved humans. Moreover, we must never conceive of Jesus Christ

as some innocent third party introduced to bear the punishment of the

world. It is God himself who has redeemed us, for Jesus Christ is God.

Why could not God choose simply to forgive us the way we forgive those

who do us wrong? The answer is to be found in the kind of God with

whom we have to deal. He is not a sinful person who takes wrongdoing

lightly and can therefore forgive lightly. He is holy and he takes sin

with dreadful seriousness. The shedding of Christ's blood in our

behalf is God's solution to a dilemma. On one hand, he loves us

infinitely and desires even at infinite cost to accept us into his

loving fellowship and kingdom. On the other hand, he must uphold his

own moral law and the righteousness of his sovereign rule over the

universe.

============================

Full text of editorial:

EDITORIAL: "Why Is Easter Unattractive?" By Kenneth S. Kantzer

Somehow Easter is different from Christmas. John Robinson, bishop of Woolwich, writes: “Most people would genuinely LIKE to believe the Christmas story, but wonder whether it can be true with the world as it is after nearly 2,000 years. But in the case of the Atonement, they ask with some impatience how anything done 2,000 years ago on the cross could `affect me now'.”

It is easy to see why this is so. Every child loves Christmas. Families come together to renew their bonds, and to give and receive gifts. No holiday fills the hearts of adults or children with nostalgia as Christmas does. But the celebration of Easter, with its Passion Week and Good Friday, creates no such joyful memories. And not even the Resurrection theme of Easter Sunday can begin to rival the appeal of Christmas.

ROOT OF THE PROBLEM

The basic reason for the relative unattractiveness of Good Friday and Easter lies in the nearly total eclipse of the biblical view of God. The Death of God theologians were almost right. The God of the average American never did exist. He is only a handy tool that can safely be allowed to lie unused on the workbench until such time as we need it. Then, for this and that purpose of our own, we call upon God. God is necessary for the preservation of democracy. Or the capitalist system. Or a stable society of law and order. Or a truly fulfilled life. In desperate moments of great sickness or overwhelming catastrophe, God is handy to have around. For then, he alone can sustain us and help us out of our difficulties.

But God, the occasional helper in time of need, is a far cry from the God revealed in Holy Scripture. The God of the Bible is certainly no tool to be used at our convenience, but is the sovereign Lord of the universe. He is the ultimate being in whom all of us live and move and have our being (Acts 17:29). The point is, we cannot really understand anything rightly until we first have a right conception of God. Naturally, therefore, we cannot expect to understand either Good Friday or Easter without recognizing the framework in which they occur.

GOD IN A RED SUIT?

For example, the God of the Bible is no Santa Claus. True, God loves. But we moderns tend to see this as meaning that God gives us all good things but never makes any demands. Yet a God of all love and mercy alone would be unjust. The love of God must also be penetrated by the holiness of God.

On the other hand, some of the older theologians recognized holiness alone as the fundamental moral quality of God, and this led to an unbiblical view of God as stern and harsh, inadequately tempered by love. Yet the holiness of God is no more rightly understood than the love of God if we fail to see that his holiness is thoroughly penetrated by love. The God of the Bible is essentially a God of holy-love. To disconnect one aspect of this essential attribute from the other is only to create a false God who is not there.

From the divine perspective, holiness is a distinctive attribute of God that uniquely sets him off from humans. In biblical language, the very word “holy” means “separate,” and it is this quality of God that uniquely creates a distance between God and man. But we mortals do not see it that way. From our perspective, the distinctive thing about God is that he is omnipotent, while we have little power, or that he is omnipresent, while we are bound in space. But that only shows how badly our sin has warped our understanding of our own sin, and of the gulf between God and us created by our sin, and of the importance of this distance to God himself.

The Christian doctrine of the Atonement deals with this moral gulf between God and man. It seeks to answer the question, How can an absolutely pure and holy God ... ? No! The question must not be put that way! The question is, How can I - a sinner who has sinned against God in what I think, say, and do, and who therefore rightly stands under divine judgment - how can I find forgiveness and acceptance with the God who is, the God of infinite holiness?

HEART OF THE SOLUTION

The biblical answer to that question is the blood of Christ. Even the term falls harshly on our modern ears.

But Scripture is replete with references to the blood of Christ and his death in our behalf. The blood of Christ - his sacrificial death - is God's way of bridging the gulf between a holy God and sinful humans. At first glance it may seem strange that the death of Christ and events leading directly to it should take up nearly half the pages of the four Gospels. But the New Testament places the death of Christ at the center of its message. Paradoxical as it may seem, the death of Christ is good news. The apostle Paul wrote, “For I resolved to know nothing while I was with you except Jesus Christ and him crucified” (1 Cor. 2:2).

THEORIES OF THE ATONEMENT

Exactly HOW the blood of Christ brings us God's full forgiveness and restores us into perfect fellowship with him is enshrouded in the mystery of the infinite God of holy-love. But it is not all mystery. For though we see only in part, and even that part obscurely, God in his grace has seen fit to break through the darkness sufficiently to give us comfort and hope. On the basis of Scripture, Christians have formed several theories of the Atonement. Each is based on a piece of truth, but none contains within itself the whole truth, and all together do not begin to exhaust what the death of Christ means to the sinner who finds life and forgiveness in the biblical God of holy-love.

Popular in recent years is the theory of CHRISTUS VICTOR, defended by the Swedish bishop Gustav Aulen. By his life, death, and resurrection, Jesus Christ conquered the demonic forces of evil that destroy man and keep him from God. This understanding of the Atonement prevailed widely in the early church and has persisted across the centuries. As some have presented it, God made a bargain with Satan, who agreed to release believers from his bondage if God would give his own Son into Satan's hands. Jesus paid the ransom agreed upon, but rose from the dead and so in the end escaped Satan's clutches. (Satan, fortunately, kept his part of the bargain, even if Christ did not.)

Relieved of such bizarre aspects, the idea finds solid support from Scripture. By his death and resurrection, Christ crushed Satan's power and won for mankind a great victory over death and hell (see such passages as Gen. 3:15 and 1 Cor. 15:57-58). However, this view is inadequate because it fails to take into account the overwhelming moral emphasis in the New Testament teaching on the death of Christ. This death was no payment to Satan, but in some way his sacrifice made it RIGHT for God to forgive us our sins. So the apostle writes, “God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement. ... he did it to demonstrate his justice at the present time, so as to be [both] just and the one who justifies the man who has faith in Jesus” (Rom. 3:25-26, NIV).

A second attempt to understand the death of Christ is in the terms of an example. The Christian life is lived in imitation of Jesus so that we see what he did in his earthly life and are always to do the same. No doubt we would all be better if we followed this guide in our daily life, but New Testament teaching about the Christian life is far removed from this. We are to live our own genuine life-not just imitate the things Jesus did. True, in living our own lives, we are to be like Christ. Like him, we are to live out our lives in self-giving love for others rather than for ourselves. This is precisely the point of the apostle Paul in Philippians 2 (v. 5ff.).

More deeply imbedded in the heart of biblical ethics is the so-called love theory of the Atonement. God “loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins. Dear friends, since God so loved us, we also ought to love one another.... We love because he first loved us” (1 John 4:10-11, 19).

Christian ethics rests at bottom on a conviction that love is stronger than fear, or hate, or greed, or anything. The most powerful motive for living a truly good life of self-giving service to God and to others is the love that wells up in our hearts in response to the overwhelming love of God in Christ. Isaac Watts captures this truth in what many regard as the greatest hymn ever written in any language:

When I survey the wondrous cross,

On which the Prince of glory died,

My richest gain I count but loss,

And pour contempt on all my pride.

Were the whole realm of nature mine,

That were a present far too small;

Love so amazing, so divine,

Demands my soul, my life, my all.

But even the love theory of the Atonement is insufficient when it stands alone, because it provides no moral ground for the shedding of Christ's blood for our salvation. Christ's death could not be interpreted as the ultimate tragedy-the best man who ever lived, trapped by the forces of irrational evil. It is only when his death is seen as the ultimate act of divine love doing for me what had to be done to save me that it gains its transforming moral power.

THE MORAL NECESSITY OF CHRIST'S DEATH

This leads us to the substitutionary-satisfaction theory of the Atonement, which has come under such heavy fire in modern times. In part, this view has suffered from the well-meant excesses by which it has often been explained. It has suffered even more because of the erosion of the biblical concept of divine holiness and human sin. In reality, it is only on the basis on the substitutionary-satisfaction understanding of Christ's death that the love theory and all other views of the Atonement make any sense. The shedding of Christ's blood as a necessary price for our redemption from sin runs, in fact, through all the Bible from the entrance of sin into the human race (Gen. 3:15) to the final triumphant song of the Book of Revelation: “... you were slain, and with your blood you purchased men for God from every tribe and language and people and nation” (Rev. 5:9).

In anticipation, the prophet Isaiah says, `The punishment that brought us peace was upon him ... and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all (53:5-6, NIV). The same theme resounds throughout the New Testament.

“Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us” (Gal. 3:13). He is the “Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!” (John 1:29). “But now he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to do away with sin by the sacrifice of himself” (Heb. 9:26). “He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world” (1 John 2:2; all quotations from the NIV).

The Scriptures, therefore, speak of the death of Christ as a redemption and as a price paid for our deliverance from sin. They speak of it as a “propitiation,” or, better, as an act that meets the demands of ultimate righteousness. It enables a holy God, who loves us infinitely, to forgive us without detriment to his moral nature and moral government.

Of course, the idea of any sort of substitutionary satisfaction to make it morally right for God to forgive our sins presents' difficulties. It is alien to our modern lighthearted view of sin and the easy chumminess of a Santa Claus God.

We have no time to answer all these objections, even if we could. There is something ridiculous about the charge that an atonement is neither necessary nor appropriate for God. It smacks of spiritual arrogance, a covert claim to omniscience that borders on the absurd. The New Testament documents tell us that Christ's death was the way God secured our salvation and became free to accept us. We either believe it or we do not. But who are we to psychoanalyze the infinite holy God and then pronounce on what he needs to do to receive sinners into his fellowship? If Scripture is not sufficient for us, then modesty at least dictates silence on such a mysterious topic.

Yet the most frequent objections can be answered fairly easily. For example: Is God a severe and angry deity who must be appeased by the sacrifice of Christ, rather as unfriendly pagan deities were either bought off from doing harm to their worshipers or bribed to do favors for them? Did God need to wait until the penalty at Christ's death was fully paid before he could respond in love to us? Of course not. The Bible is clear that God loves all humans and, in fact, has always loved them. It was his eternal, self-giving love that brought him down into the world as God incarnate in Jesus Christ to redeem us. Moreover, we must never conceive of Jesus Christ as some innocent third party introduced to bear the punishment of the world. It is God himself who has redeemed us, for Jesus Christ is God.

But why could not God choose simply to forgive us the way we forgive those who do us wrong? Again, the answer is to be found in the kind of God with whom we have to deal. He is not a sinful person who takes wrongdoing lightly and can therefore forgive lightly. He is holy and he takes sin with dreadful seriousness. He is also the sovereign judge of the universe, ultimately responsible for its moral order. What would we think of a judge who, with no recognition of the moral order, freely and easily forgave every repentant criminal? The shedding of Christ's blood in our behalf is God's solution to a dilemma. On one hand, he loves us infinitely and desires even at infinite cost to accept us into his loving fellowship and kingdom. On the other hand, he must uphold his own moral law and the righteousness of his sovereign rule over the universe.

The story of Easter would not be complete without the glorious conclusion of the bodily resurrection, and the present and future ministry of the living Christ. He shed his blood as a sacrifice of love to win us back to God. And that same life-giving blood by the work of the indwelling Holy Spirit now works in us to give us spiritual life. Daily it nourishes, sustains, and strengthens us. By the power of Christ's life, we conquer sin and come to spiritual health. And one day, that same life-giving power will transform us into the perfect Christlikeness that is promised to all who are willing to receive it.

____________

The best popular work on the Atonement is by Leon Morris, “Glory in the Cross: A Study in Atonement” (Hodder and Stoughton: London, 1966).

*

Our Only Boast

Galatians 6:14

Good Friday sermon, Succasunna Presbyterian Church. Galatians 6:14-15

==============

OUR ONLY BOAST

==============

I. A bummer of a holiday.

A. Easter has little of pizzazz of Christmas, Good Friday has none.

B. Vivid images I have of Good Friday:

C. Good Friday is a significant holiday, not a "fun" one.

II. Cross-less Christianity.

A. Religion doesn't need a cross. Gal 2:21

B. The biblical view of God has been totally eclipsed.

C. Aren't there other options?

III. Something to brag about.

A. First Century had even greater problems with cross than us.

B. The cross tells us distasteful truths about ourselves.

C. Paul was far from ashamed - he bragged about it.

IV. The radical renunciation.

A. Crucified to world. (subjective - what we do)

B. New creation. (objective - what God does)

V. Why should you be let in?

A. Evangelistic question: Stand before God, he asks why you should

B. One answer alone is acceptable - Jesus gave me admission.

#3119

*

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Serm695 Good Friday via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crossredemption

Did Christ Really Die?

Mark 15:24

DID CHRIST REALLY DIE?

According to the Word of God, yes, He really died!

Those who claim this was not true have several different explanations as to what could have happened that made it appear that Christ died.

You see, there are documented cases on record of people who appeared to have died, but who were revived. For example-

Remember the story of the young man from a small town in South Carolina, Jackie Bain. During the Viet Nam war he was shot. The medics pronounced him dead. He was placed in a truck to be transported to the morgue when something very strange happened. As he was in transit, he revived. He began to make some noise and almost scared the driver to death. The driver stopped the truck, jumped out and opened the door to investigate. Upon checking in the back, the driver could see immediately Jackie was not dead. He slammed the door and instead of heading to the morgue, he went to the nearest hospital. When they arrived the doctors began to give Mr. Bain the medical care he needed. In a few weeks he walked out of the hospital. The doctors explained that when Jackie was pronounced dead, he was probably so close to death that life could not be detected. It could be that his heart even momentarily had stopped beating while he was in the ambulance, but as they traveled on the bumpy road, the bumps jarred his heart and caused it to begin beating again.

Could that be what happened to Jesus? Some surmise that something similar did happen, and that He actually did not die. There are all kinds of theories being put forth by ungodly people as to what happened to Jesus.

A. THE THIEF THEORY. These would have us believe that instead of Jesus having been raised from the dead, His body was stolen from the tomb. After the body was stolen, then the apostles began to preach the lie that Jesus had been raised from the dead.

B. THE SWOON THEORY. Would have you believe that Christ did not actually die on the cross. Instead, He fainted. Then later, He mysteriously became conscience and appeared to the disciples. They began to spread the lie that He had been raised from the dead.

C. THE HALLUCINATION THEORY. Those who believe this say that rather than actually seeing the risen Lord, the disciples simply imagined they saw Him. That is, they wanted so much to believe He was risen from the dead that they allowed their imaginations to control their reasoning.

D. THE WRONG TOMB THEORY. These simply say that the Lord’s body was placed in the wrong tomb. Instead of being put in Joseph’s tomb, He was put into another tomb. Therefore, when they arrived at Joseph’s tomb, they found it empty because Jesus’ body had never been placed there from the beginning. Then they claimed that the disciples went everywhere preaching about the empty tomb.

There are those today who will believe anything rather than believe what this Bible tells us about the resurrection of Christ. Why do men so bitterly detest the resurrection of Christ? Because, they know if He was really resurrected from the dead it validates everything He said about Himself being the Savior of the world. They then will have to repent of their sins, or they will have to stand before Him on Judgment day.

Science & the Shroud

Hoax or holy grail? The argument about the Shroud of Turin spans centuries. No one has proven it is the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth, but its haunting image of a man's wounded body is proof enough for true believers.

Researchers from the Health Science Center now appear to have the clue to resolve a scientific contradiction: If the shroud is authentic, why does radiocarbon dating indicate that the cloth is no more than about 700 years old?

The shroud is unquestionably old. Its history is known from the year 1357, when it surfaced in the tiny village of Lirey, France. Until recent reports from San Antonio, most of the scientific world accepted the findings of carbon dating carried out in 1988. The results said the shroud dated back to 1260-1390, and thus is much too new to be Jesus' burial linen.

Now the date and other shroud controversies are under intense scrutiny because of discoveries by a team led by Leoncio A. Garza-Valdes, MD, adjunct professor of microbiology, and Stephen J. Mattingly, PhD, professor of microbiology. Dr. Garza is a pediatrician from San Antonio, and an archaeologist noted for expertise in pre-Columbian artifacts. Dr. Mattingly, president of the Texas branch of the American Society for Microbiology, is widely respected for his research on group B streptococci and neonatal disease.

After months examining microscopic samples, the team concluded in January that the Shroud of Turin is centuries older than its carbon date. Dr. Garza said the shroud's fibers are coated with bacteria and fungi that have grown for centuries. Carbon dating, he said, had sampled the contaminants as well as the fibers' cellulose.

Such startling findings ordinarily would be published in a scientific journal, but the team has waited. The shroud's ultimate custodian, the Catholic Church, has declined to designate the San Antonio fibers as an official sample. Dr. Garza received them in Turin, Italy, in 1993 from Giovanni Riggi di Numana, who took the official shroud samples for the carbon dating in the '80s.

Dr. Garza's hypothesis, however, transcends the shroud, and it is being taken seriously by archaeologists, microbiologists, and even those most closely associated with carbon dating.

“This is not a crazy idea,” said Harry E. Gove, PhD, co-inventor of the use of accelerator mass spectrometry for carbon dating. Dr. Gove is professor emeritus of physics at the University of Rochester in New York. “A swing of 1,000 years would be a big change, but it's not wildly out of the question, and the issue needs to be resolved,” he said.

Toward that end, the University of Arizona in Tucson is preparing carbon dating procedures to test the hypothesis on an ibis bird mummy that stylistically would date back to about 330-30 BC. Physicists will sample collagen from bone, which is relatively unaffected by bacteria and fungi, and compare its date to wrappings from the mummy. Textiles contain large quantities of bacteria and fungi because they have much more surface area by volume than a smooth object of similar size, therefore the mummy wrappings are important for comparison.

Two samples of mummy wrapping will be tested; one that is cleansed of contaminants with conventional methods, and another sample cleansed with a method developed by Drs. Garza and Mattingly. Dr. Garza has said the conventional method fails to remove the bacteria and fungi.

“I'm a bit skeptical, but I don't want to dismiss the theory. It is possible that contaminants could throw off the dates somewhat, but by how much?” said Douglas J. Donahue, PhD, physics professor at the University of Arizona and principal investigator at the National Science Foundation/Arizona's Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Laboratories, where the tests are planned in the coming months. The site performed parts of the 1988 carbon dating of the shroud.

The unfolding events have engrossed museum curators, antiquities dealers, and scholars.

“This could be a great breakthrough in understanding the ancient world,” said A. Rosalie David, PhD, keeper of Egyptology at the Manchester Museum in England. “If the theory is correct, and there seems to be a lot of evidence it is, this would be a spot check to tell if artifacts in museums or for sale on the market are genuine or fakes,” Dr. David said. She has joined the project, and supplied samples from a museum mummy to the Arizona laboratories.

The San Antonio discovery goes back to the '80s when Dr. Garza discovered “biogenic varnishes” on an ancient Mayan carved jade called the Itzamna Tun. The artifact had been labeled a fake by two art connoisseurs in New York, he said. Carbon dating failed to come close to the carved stone's true age, and Dr. Garza identified masses of varnish that prevented accurate dating, thus upholding the jade's authenticity. The varnishes, he learned, are a plastic-like coating that is a byproduct of bacteria and fungi. In the Itzamna Tun's case, this bioplastic coating threw off the carbon date of ancient blood on the artifact by about 600 years.

Could this be true of the Shroud of Turin?

In May 1993, Dr. Garza traveled to Turin, and examined a shroud sample with the approval of Catholic authorities. “As soon as I looked at a segment in the microscope, I knew it was heavily contaminated,” Dr. Garza said. “I knew that what had been radiocarbon dated was a mixture of linen and the bacteria and fungi and bioplastic coating that had grown on the fibers for centuries. We had not dated the linen itself.”

Dr. Garza returned to San Antonio with a few threads from the lower right corner of the shroud. He enlisted Dr. Mattingly. Together they applied the principles of microbiology to the evaluation of several archaeological specimens. “Archaeomicrobiology,” as they describe their discipline, had never been used before on the shroud or almost any other artifact.

At the Health Science Center and elsewhere, they examined samples using optical and electron microscopes and sophisticated viewing techniques, and photographed them under high magnification using special dyes and lighting. The researchers delicately sliced fibers to expose cross-sections of the bioplastic coating, and are working with an enzyme process to cleanse contaminated samples.

Because Egyptian mummies appear to have the same contamination on their wrappings, Egyptologists such as Dr. David are eager to learn whether the mummies are correctly dated. The Manchester Museum, for example, has supplied samples from its mysterious mummy No. 1770 for carbon testing using the Garza-Mattingly cleansing technique. British experts cannot fully explain why carbon dating of No. 1770's wrappings indicate they are 1,000 years younger than the bones.

Until now, archeologists attributed the discrepancy to the ancient Egyptians themselves. “The suggestion was that the body was found in a very damaged condition perhaps 500 years after it was first wrapped. The thinking is that the embalmers were uncertain who this was, but the spot where the mummy was found indicated it might be somebody of importance so they re-wrapped it to give it another chance at eternity. And that is where it was left until this discovery by Dr. Garza,” she said.

In his discoveries about Mayan artifacts, Dr. Garza challenged orthodox thinking and relentlessly pursued his theory, which yielded significant results, said a longtime associate, George E. Harlow, PhD, curator of minerals and gems at the American Museum of Natural History in New York. “Many of us in science wander down a low-energy trough, studying the things we want to study, but Dr. Garza doesn't know or regard conventional wisdom very highly so it is stimulating to find out what he is doing. He deserves much credit for his willingness to challenge authority, pursue investigations and try to be objective.”

Practicing science with the Shroud of Turin puts Drs. Garza and Mattingly in a charged atmosphere. Moving the shroud's origin back several centuries would place it closer to the time of Jesus' death, and certainly energize debate about whether the cloth is a hoax or holy grail.

Adding to the atmosphere, a third member of their team has identified a part of the shroud's markings as that of blood from a human male. No one has conclusively determined how the markings got on the linen, but they appear in bas relief in a perfect negative image. Experts have entertained theories that the markings came from paint, scorching, or accelerated aging.

Victor V. Tryon, PhD, assistant professor in microbiology and director of the university's Center for Advanced DNA Technologies, examined the DNA of one so-called “blood glob” from two separate microscopic shroud samples. He reported isolating signals from three different human genes by employing polymerase chain reaction, which can detect pieces of double-stranded DNA.

Amid the debate, Drs. Garza and Mattingly cannot escape the fundamental question of whether they have real shroud fibers. A transfer of papal authority in Turin and a turn of events three years ago there further cloud the issue.

Turin's Cardinal Giovanni Saldarini has publicly questioned the authenticity of the sample. On Italian television in January, he was quoted as saying: “There is no certainty that the material belongs to the shroud so that the Holy See and the custodian declare that they cannot recognize the results of the claimed experiments.”

Cardinal Saldarini rejected Dr. Garza's request in April 1993 to perform tests on shroud fibers. But his refusal came days after Dr. Garza had arrived in Turin, and obtained a sample that remained from the 1988 cutting for radiocarbon dating. He received the sample from Riggi, a scientist appointed by Saldarini's predecessor, Cardinal Anastasio Ballestrero, to do the cutting. Ballestrero retired in 1990.

Where the new testing and other events will lead is uncertain, but few people deny the work of the Health Science Center team has expanded the scope of microbiology. In the process, the researchers have developed methods that promise to enhance the accuracy of radiocarbon dating. They also have given archaeologists a new tool to evaluate antiquities. And perhaps they have even opened a path that leads to an explanation of the enduring mysteries of the Shroud of Turin.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements · Jim Barrett via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database good friday

From Calvary To Dollar Tree

Mark 15:15

Stopping into one of the dollar stores this week, I couldn’t help but notice the display of reduced Easter memorabilia prominently arranged on a counter near the front doors. Alongside the plush toy bunnies, brightly colored plastic eggs, assorted dye kits and baskets lined with artificial grass were two items that stopped me in my tracks: candy crosses.

One expressed the hopeful message, “May His light shine upon you! Milk Chocolate Flavored, Net WT 1 Oz (28g),” while the other admonished, “Rejoice in the Wonder of the Day! Milk Chocolate Flavored, Net WT 1 Oz (28g).”

Is this now the summation of the death of Jesus — and of the cruel instrument of torture and execution on which he suffered? Are our marketing motivations in this “Christian nation” so strong that something this sacred is thus diminished and demeaned? Has the Cross of Christ really been reduced to a chocolate treat in a discount store?

When I was younger, I heard misguided criticisms of my Catholic brothers and sisters in the faith. That was years ago when many Baptists wondered if Roman Catholics were Christians at all. “Catholics focus too much on Good Friday, and in their churches, Jesus is still on the Cross,” someone would say, referring to a beautifully carved crucifix. “But Jesus isn’t there. The Cross is empty because Jesus is alive!”

But as I held in my hand what was once a focus of our faith and a symbol of suffering, now reduced to a sweet confection, I longed for a more thoughtful remembrance of Jesus’ final hours. Of course, I am not arguing for candy crucifixes, with milk chocolate figures of Jesus hanging on edible crosses. Instead, I would like for the “wonder of the day” not to be served up in 28-gram portions.

In an Easter special issue in 2015, Newsweek magazine examined the terrifying nature of the Cross and its purpose as a political tool of the Roman Empire: “In the age of Roman domination, only Rome crucified. And they did it often.... It was a popular method of dispatching threats to the empire. ‘Romans practiced both random and intentional violence against populations they had conquered, killing tens of thousands by crucifixion,’ says New Testament scholar Hal Taussig” of New York’s Union Theological Seminary.

Over time, after trying other vicious methods of capital punishment, the Romans realized that crucifying its state enemies was the greatest deterrent to rebellion and insurrection. The agonizing death of victims of crucifixion, as well as the punitive custom of leaving bodies on crosses to be picked apart by scavenger animals and birds, was absolutely shocking. Every aspect of death on a cross was a ghastly reminder of imperial power.

“Every aspect of death on a cross was a ghastly reminder of imperial power.”

But the horror has been hidden in our contemporary gospel choruses. In typical fashion, the lyrics of “Mighty Cross,” by Elevation Worship, move rather quickly to focus on our forgiveness purchased through Jesus’ death, as well as to gloss over the understandable panic that caused him to beg God for a different plan:

On the day that death surrendered to the mighty Cross of Jesus Christ,

The earth would shake, beneath the weight of darkened skies.

On his brow, a crown of sorrow for a King whose weakness was our strength.

No word he spoke, his love was shown for all to see.

Oh, the Cross of Jesus Christ, he’s the reason I’m alive.

For his blood has set me free. It will never lose its power for me!

But if one is not convinced by the theory of substitutionary atonement, then the rush past Jesus’ pain to our personal rescue is inappropriate. Suppose, for example, that other ancient meanings of the Cross which have been offered over the course of church history are considered.

Perhaps one is moved by the martyr motif that acknowledges Jesus as “the faithful witness (martus) ... who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood” (Revelation 1:5-6). Or maybe one is emboldened by the exemplar, or moral example, theory of the cross, where Jesus demonstrates, in his own suffering, that “no one has greater love than this, to lay down one’s life for one’s friends” (John 15:13).

In either case, the follower of Christ must contemplate the figure who was on the Cross for six excruciating hours. For he was either the ultimate witness, or martyr, testifying through his suffering to the power in weakness and vulnerability. Or he was the greatest illustration of godly compassion in his willingness to endure an evil execution.

So, could it be that we must not so quickly empty the cross of its victim, nor of alternate reasons that Friday should be called “Good”? Might the crucifix, indeed, be fitting even in our Baptist churches?

The crucifix is not only important in the Latin Rite of the Roman Catholic Church, but it has a prominent place in the Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Lutheran, Moravian and Anglican churches as well. Perhaps these Christian siblings of ours have much to teach us.

Often, Baptist congregations will sing a particular hymn on Easter Sunday: “Lo, in the grave he lay, Jesus, my Savior. Waiting the coming day, Jesus my Lord. Up from the grave he arose, with a mighty triumph o’er his foes. He arose the victor o’er the dark domain, and he lives forever with his saints to reign. He arose! He arose! HALLELUJAH, CHRIST AROSE!”

Excitement fills the air, as it should. There are smiles on faces. The praise team on the platform can’t keep from swaying in rhythm. The piano and organ are played as majestically as possible. Jesus is not on the Cross, he is alive!

It’s a cheerful time — a day for wearing our newest clothing, for taking family pictures in front of the flower-decorated chicken-wire cross, for sharing a wonderful meal around a table laden with food and served with the best china and cutlery.

To be clear, I love Easter Sunday also. I have sung that song with enthusiasm and joy. I have worn my best suit and taken those family photos too. I have enjoyed the pot roast and potatoes, the banana pudding and coffee.

“When I see the chocolate crosses, I think that celebratory elements of Easter may have received too much emphasis.”

But maybe we Baptists need more focus on Good Friday. When I see the chocolate crosses, I think that celebratory elements of Easter may have received too much emphasis. It’s not just that candy companies are selling crosses, possibly designed by imaginative Christians, but that these trivial snacks are intended for Christian shoppers, who are expected to buy them.

For many years, as a professor at Logsdon Seminary, I used several video episodes of a 1977 BBC documentary series, The Long Search. In that interesting presentation of religions around the world, London theater director Ronald Eyre explores the meaning of Theravada and Zen Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, Islam, Daoism, New Age spiritualities and African religions, as well as Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox Christianity.

The Orthodox episode was filmed in a Romanian village. I was moved by the Good Friday worship. Everyone in the hamlet, it seemed, gathered along the road for the procession of the priest, who ushered them into the small church. At the front of the room, a casket was resting upon two small tables of the same height, leaving perhaps four feet of empty space under the middle of the decorated wooden coffin. At the conclusion of the solemn service, the townspeople lined up and processed toward the physical symbol of Christ’s death, bowing their heads and stooping low to pass under the casket. It made me think of the words that generally accompany baptism: “buried with Christ and raised with him to walk in the newness of life.”

Why does my church celebrate Maundy Thursday and Easter Sunday but not Good Friday? How can so many Christians wear ornamental crosses around their necks or as bracelet charms or dangly earrings, when the original shape instilled fear and loathing?

What exactly is the wonder of the day? And will we sugarcoat his sacrifice by replacing the crucifix with chocolate candy?

________

Rob Sellers is professor of theology and missions emeritus at Hardin-Simmons University’s Logsdon Seminary in Abilene, Texas.

Three Trees On A Hill

Luke 2:7

Once upon a mountain top, three little trees stood and dreamed of what they wanted to become when they grew up.

The first little tree looked up at the stars and said: "I want to hold treasure. I want to be covered with gold and filled with precious stones. I'll be the most beautiful treasure chest in the world!"

The second little tree looked out at the small stream trickling by on its way to the ocean. "I want to be traveling mighty waters and carrying powerful kings. I'll be the strongest ship in the world!"

The third little tree looked down into the valley below where busy men and women worked in a busy town. "I don't want to leave the mountain top at all. I want to grow so tall that when people stop to look at me, they'll raise their eyes to heaven and think of God. I will be the tallest tree in the world."

Years passed. The rain came, the sun shone, and the little trees grew tall. One day three woodcutters climbed the mountain.

The first woodcutter looked at the first tree and said, "This tree is beautiful. It is perfect for me." With swoops of his shining axe, the first tree fell.

"Now I shall be made into a beautiful chest, I shall hold wonderful treasure!" the first tree said.

The second woodcutter looked at the second tree and said, "This tree is strong. It is perfect for me." With swoops of his shining axe, the second tree fell.

"Now I shall sail mighty waters!" thought the second tree. "I shall be a strong ship for mighty kings!"

The third tree felt her heart sink when the last woodcutter looked her way. She stood straight and tall and pointed bravely to heaven.

But the woodcutter never even looked up. "Any kind of tree will do for me." He muttered. With a swoop of his shining axe, the third tree fell.

The first tree rejoiced when the woodcutter brought her to a carpenter's shop. But the carpenter fashioned the tree into a feedbox for animals. The once beautiful tree was not covered with gold, with treasure. She was coated with saw dust and filled with hay for hungry farm animals.

The second tree smiled when the woodcutter took her to a shipyard, but no mighty sailing ship was made that day. Instead the once strong tree was hammered and sawed into a simple fishing boat. She was too small and too weak to sail to an ocean, or even a river; instead she was taken to a little lake.

The third tree was confused when the woodcutter cut her into strong beams and left her in a lumberyard. "What happened?" the once tall tree wondered. "All I ever wanted was to stay on the mountain top and point to God..."

Many many days and nights passed. The three trees nearly forgot their dreams.

But one night, golden starlight poured over the first tree as a young woman placed her newborn baby in the feedbox.

"I wish I could make a cradle for him," her husband whispered. The mother squeezed his hand and smiled as the starlight shone on the smooth and the sturdy wood. "This manger is beautiful," she said.

And suddenly the first tree knew he was holding the greatest treasure in the world.

One evening a tired traveler and his friends crowded into the old fishing boat. The traveler fell asleep as the second tree quietly sailed out into the lake. Soon a thundering and thrashing storm arose. The little tree shuddered. She knew she did not have the strength to carry so many passengers safely through with the wind and the rain. The tired man awakened. He stood up, stretched out his hand, and said, "Peace." The storm stopped as quickly as it had begun.

And suddenly the second tree knew he was carrying the king of heaven and earth.

One Friday morning, the third tree was startled when her beams were yanked from the forgotten woodpile. She flinched as she was carried through an angry jeering crowd. She shuddered when soldiers nailed a man's hands to her. She felt ugly and harsh and cruel. But on Sunday morning, when the sun rose and the earth trembled with joy beneath her, the third tree knew that God's love had changed everything. It had made the third tree strong.

And every time people thought of the third tree, they would think of God.

That was better than being the tallest tree in the world.

The Cross Is A Radical Thing

Luke 9:23

The cross of Christ is the most revolutionary thing ever to appear among men.

The cross of the Roman times knew no compromise; it never made concessions. It won all its arguments by killing its opponent and silencing him for good. It spared not Christ, by slew Him the same as the rest. He was alive when they hung Him on that cross and completely dead when they took him down six hours later.

That was the cross the first time it appeared in Christian history.

After Christ was risen from the dead the apostles went out to preach His message, and what they preached was the cross. And wherever they went into the wide world they carried the cross, and the same revolutionary power went with them. The radical message of the cross transformed Saul of Tarsus and changed him from a persecutor of Christians to a tender believer and an apostle of the faith. Its power changed bad men into good ones. It shook off the long bondage of paganism and altered completely the whole moral and mental outlook of the Western world.

All this it did and continued to do as long as it was permitted to remain what it had been originally, a cross. Its power departed when it was changed from a thing of death to a thing of beauty. When men made of it a symbol, hung it around their necks as an ornament or made its outline before their faces as a magic sign to ward off evil, then it became at best a weak emblem, at worst a positive fetish. As such it is revered today by millions who know absolutely nothing about its power.

The cross effects its ends by destroying one established pattern, the victim’s, and creating another pattern, its own. Thus it always has its way. It wins by defeating its opponent and imposing its will upon him. It always dominates. It never compromises, never dickers nor confers, never surrenders a point for the sake of peace. It cares not for peace; it cares only to end its opposition as fast as possible.

With perfect knowledge of all this Christ said:

“If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his

cross daily and follow me.” -- Luke 9:23 (NIV)

So the cross not only brings Christ’s life to an end, it ends also the first life, the old life, of every one of His true followers. It destroys the old pattern, the Adam pattern, in the believer’s life, and brings it to an end. Then the God who raised Christ from the dead raises the believer and a new life begins.

This, and nothing less, is true Christianity, though we cannot but recognize the sharp divergence of this conception from that held by the rank and file of evangelicals today. But we dare not qualify our position. The cross stands high above the opinions of men and to that cross all opinions must come at last for judgment.

A shallow and worldly leadership would modify the cross to please the entertainment-mad saintlings who will have their fun even within the very sanctuary; but to do so is to court spiritual disaster and risk the anger of the Lamb turned Lion.

We must do something about the cross, and one of two things only we can do -- flee it or die upon it. And if we should be so foolhardy as to flee we shall by that act put away the faith of our fathers and make of Christianity something other than it is. Then we shall have left only the empty language of salvation; the power will depart with our departure from the true cross.

If we are wise we will do what Jesus did: endure the cross and despise its shame for the joy that is set before us. To do this is to submit the whole pattern of our lives to be destroyed and built again in the power of an endless life. And we shall find that it is more than poetry, more than sweet hymnody and elevated feeling. The cross will cut into where it hurts worst, sparing neither us nor our carefully cultivated reputations. It will defeat us and bring our selfish lives to an end. Only then can we rise in fullness of life to establish a pattern of living wholly new and free and full of good works.

The changed attitude toward the cross that we see in modern orthodoxy proves not that God has changed, nor that Christ has eased up on His demand that we carry the cross; it means rather that current Christianity has moved away from the standards of the New Testament. So far have we moved indeed that it may take nothing short of a new reformation to restore the cross to its right place in the theology and life of the Church.

*

[Original illustration at this number was moved to HolwickID #34143]

Imagining Crucifixion

Try to imagine yourself at Golgotha Hill on Good Friday. The cross is placed on the ground and you are thrown backward with your shoulders against the wood. The legionnaire feels for the depression at the front of your wrist. He drives a heavy, square wrought-iron nail through your wrist and deep into the wood. Quickly he moves to the other side and repeats the action, being careful not to pull your arms too tightly, allowing you some flex and movement.

The cross is then lifted into place and fastened onto the upright set into the hill. Your left foot is pressed backward against the right foot, and with both feet extended, toes down, a nail is driven through the arch of each, leaving your knees flexed. You are now crucified. As you slowly sag down with more weight on the nails in the wrists, excruciating, fiery pain shoots along the fingers and up the arms to explode in your brain. You push yourself upward to avoid this stretching torment. But now you feel the searing agony of the nail tearing through the nerves of your feet.

As the arms fatigue, cramps sweep through your muscles, knotting them in deep, relentless, throbbing pain. With these cramps comes the inability to push yourself upward to breathe. Air can be drawn into the lungs but not exhaled. You fight to raise yourself in order to get even one small breath. What follows is hours of limitless pain: cycles of twisting, joint-rending cramps; intermittent partial asphyxiation; searing pain as tissue is torn from your lacerated back as you move up and down against the rough timber.

Then another agony begins: a deep, crushing pain within the chest as your heart cavity fills with serum and begins to compress the heart. It is now almost over: the loss of fluids has reached a critical level; the compressed heart is struggling to pump heavy, thick, sluggish blood into the tissues; the tortured lungs are making a frantic effort to gasp in small gulps of air.

Finally, you feel the chill of death creeping through your tissues. You welcome its approach.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixion

A Mother's Sacrificial Love

John 10:15

On Sunday, August 16, 1987, Northwest Airlines flight 225 crashed just after taking off from the Detroit airport. One hundred fifty-five people were killed. One survived: a 4-year-old from Tempe, Arizona, named Cecelia.

News accounts say when rescuers found Cecelia, they did not believe she had been on the plane. Investigators first assumed Cecelia had been a passenger in one of the cars on the highway onto which the airliner crashed. But when the passenger register for the flight was checked, there was Cecelia's name.

Cecelia survived because, as the plane was falling, Cecelia's mother, Paula Chican, unbuckled her own seat belt, got down on her knees in front of her daughter, wrapped her arms and body around Cecelia, and then would not let her go.

Nothing could separate that child from her parent's love — not tragedy or disaster, not the fall or the flames that followed, not height nor depth, not life nor death. Such is the love of our Savior for us. He left heaven, lowered himself to us, and covered us with the sacrifice of His own body to save us.

___________

Quote is adapted from Bryan Chapell's "In The Grip of Grace" (Baker, 1992).

===================

Another version from Mitchell Dillon, in Illustration Exchange Internet Newsletter

Love to Last a Lifetime

Occasionally, a news item will really capture my attention. This happened on the evening of August 16th, 1987. I was watching the news when it was reported that a Northwest Airlines jet had crashed just after take off from the Detroit airport, killing 155 people. As horrific as the report was, it wasn’t the crash or the casualties that surprised me as much as what followed. The lone survivor of the crash was a four year old little girl. I remember wondering how a small, frail, four year old could survive when everyone else had died. Was she sitting in just the right seat? Was it her size that helped her avoid the fate of the other passengers?

Seventeen years later I came across the answer to this mystery in an article that mentioned the Detroit crash. In it I learned that the little girl’s name was Cecelia and that the first responders to the accident were so surprised to find her alive that they concluded that she must have been a passenger in one of the vehicles on the highway where the plane had crashed. Though very young, Cecelia was old enough to tell the amazing story behind her miraculous survival.

According to the little girl’s testimony, as the plane was falling from the sky, her mother unbuckled her own seat belt, knelt down in front of her, wrapped her arms and body around her, and refused to let go! Cecelia’s mother had used her own body to shield her from death!

As I marveled over this unimaginable act of self-less love, it occurred to me that Cecelia would now be a grown woman. As such, she would have grown up without the tangible love of her mother. Her mother wasn’t there to send her off on that first day of school, or available to counsel her during those difficult teen years, or present to cheer for her on graduation day, or be there to cry for joy on her wedding day.

Nevertheless, I am sure of one thing. There has never been a day, no, not one moment when Cecelia has ever questioned her mother’s love. By one pure, bold, and courageous act, this mother sent her daughter a message of love sufficient to last her a life time. Such an unequivocal and selfless act stands firm like a rock, immovable and unchallengeable. In the face of such love, time and distance become irrelevant.

Did you know that Jesus was moved by just such a love when He put himself in harms way to secure your salvation? By setting aside the exercise of His deity and taking on the humble form of humanity, Jesus unbuckled His seat belt. By entering Jerusalem to meet his prophesied end, He knelt before you. By suffering on the cross, He wrapped His arms and body around you and refused to let go! By dying on the cross Jesus offered Himself, His own body, to shield you from eternal death!

When God seems distant, you must remember the message of the Cross. Such an unequivocal act of love stands firm like a rock, immovable and unchallengeable. In the face of such love, time and distance become irrelevant. Listen, believe, and know that you are truly loved.

“Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends” (John 15:13).

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #2020]

from www.christianitytoday.com, Leadership Journal · Phillip Gunter, Round Rock, Texas via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database sacrificemothergod s love

Christ Is Alive

On one occasion Michelangelo, the great artist, turned on his fellow artists in a spirit of indignation. Said he: “Why do you keep filling gallery after gallery with endless pictures of the one ever-reiterated theme, of Christ in weakness, Christ upon the Cross, Christ dying, most of all, Christ hanging dead? Why do you concentrate on that passing episode, as if that were the last word and the final scene, as if the curtain dropped upon that hour of disaster and defeat? At worst, that lasted only a few hours. But to the end of unending eternity, Christ is alive! Christ rules and reigns and triumphs!”

Michelangelo was right. Even though the cross is vitally important because of the redemption Jesus accomplished for us there, we must not emphasize His death to the exclusion of His resurrection victory. We should think of Him now in His glorified state in heaven.

________

“Choice Illustrations.” W.W. Clay, pg 93-94)

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database hopegood fridayeaster

Expensive Love

1 John 2:2

It was a cold and snowy January afternoon in Washington, D.C. The passengers aboard Air Florida Flight 90 were anxious to get out of the city and to their warm Florida destination. They never made it. The jetliner couldn't clear the 14th Street Bridge, crashed into it, and then into the icy waters of the Potomac where it went straight to the bottom. Only five passengers and one flight attendant made their way out of the submerged wreckage and made it to the surface. They clung to a small section of the tail that remained afloat. The first responders were aboard a National Park service helicopter, lowering a ring-shaped lifeline to the people who were clinging desperately to that piece of wreckage. One of the survivors was described as a 50-ish man to whom they lowered that lifeline. Each time, he passed it off to someone else - until finally he was the last one left to be rescued. But when the chopper returned for him, he was gone. He was the one who didn't make it.

I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about “Expensive Love.”

He sacrificed himself to save others. He gave up his life so others could live. I owe my life to a man like that. His name is Jesus. Given the choice of letting you and me die for the sinning we have done, He passed the lifeline to us and died in our place. That's a love you do not want to miss because you never really took the lifeline.

In 1 John 2:2, our word for today from the Word of God, He makes clear exactly what was going on when the Son of God was dying on that old rugged cross. “He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins” - in other words, the One who did the dying that we should have done. You and I did the sinning. Jesus did the dying. He didn't die because Roman soldiers nailed Him to a cross. He died because He loves you so much that He let them nail Him to that cross. If He didn't take your hell, you would have to.

So when Jesus hung on that cross that Good Friday and said, “Father, forgive them” - He was forgiving you. When He cried out, “My God, my God, why have You forsaken Me?” the answer is, “Because of you and me.” The things you and I have done wrong may not seem bad to us, but they are so serious that God the Father had to turn His back on His own Son because His Son was carrying that sin. In the hellish darkness of Good Friday, God the Father turned His back on God the Son so He would never have to turn His back on you. Jesus looked at you and said to God, “No, Father, don't punish him! Don't punish her! Take Me instead!”

Is it any wonder that a hymn writer says, “Amazing love, how can it be - that Thou, my God, shouldst die for me!” The sacrifice has been made. The ultimate tragedy now would be that, after the price Jesus paid for you to be forgiven, you would still miss heaven, and still pay the penalty for your sin because you never grabbed the lifeline. And what better day could there be for you to grab it than this anniversary of the day He died for you.

You grab the lifeline when you tell Jesus that you're sorry for all the sin of your life, that you want to be done with it, that you're putting your total trust in Him and His death for you as your only hope of heaven.

I can almost imagine Jesus there with you where you are, saying to you, “This is the day I died for you. This is the day to finally take for yourself what I died to give you.” Don't wait. Grab the lifeline.

________________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #11375]

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #4245 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Vulnerability On Good Friday

Matthew 27

Prolific author and lecturer Henri Nouwen offers a fascinating illustration in his book, In the Name of Jesus. Recounting his experience as a priest within the Daybreak community - a community of mentally handicapped men and women - he describes the vulnerable realization of finding himself suddenly and thoroughly irrelevant. Since no one could read his books, his vast authorship was as insignificant and unimpressive as his twenty years of experience at Notre Dame, Yale, and Harvard. And yet, it was this uncomfortable sense of irrelevance that helped him recover his true identity. Writes Nouwen, “These broken, wounded, and completely unpretentious people forced me to let go of my relevant self - the self that can do things, show things, prove things, build things - and forced me to reclaim that unadorned self in which I am completely vulnerable, open to receive and give love regardless of any accomplishments.” [1]

On this Good Friday, we remember a man who changed all of history by dying on a cross, a vulnerable, unadorned man. Indeed, the very Son of God who made his way to a broken and wounded world, the Author of Life who chose to live among people that did not understand him, the Divine Servant who emptied himself on Friday to give us eternal victory on Sunday.

But if truth be told, perhaps many of us would prefer to overlook the darkness of Friday and move straight to the light of Sunday. And I have often wondered if our discomfort with Good Friday has anything to do with our discomfort with vulnerability. We remember today the vulnerable, broken Christ before an angry, mocking crowd. The people yelled, “Save yourself, if you are the Son of God, come down from the cross.” (Matthew 27:40b) The religious leaders jeered, “You said you were the King of Israel, come down and we’ll believe you!” (27:42b)

There is a part of me that wishes he would have come down to show them just Who they were mocking. He could have done so. He could have proved his power, his identity. But He didn’t. He chose to stay. He chose to die. He chose to be vulnerable, exposed, and powerless.

Still, for some the discomfort with Good Friday runs deeper. Truly, its darkness is hard to take in; its silence is awkward, its memory is haunting. Perhaps we recognize our own vulnerability before the cross, the irrelevance of our accomplishments. And in that uncomfortable recognition, many feel a pressing need to “do” something; to fill the silence, to scrub our souls in a flurry of spring-cleaning, to make our lives somehow ready for Easter Sunday. “What do we do on Good Friday?” becomes an urgent question.

Nonetheless, Good Friday answers with silence - for it is a day when mourners and mockers alike are reduced to the same impotence. A day when we can do nothing but behold, or brush aside, the One pierced for our transgressions-for He has done everything. God alone did it. He came to us in infinite love. He judged what is human. And He granted grace beyond any measure.

____________

1. Henri Nouwen, In the Name of Jesus, (New York: Crossroad, 1996), 16.

____________

Copyright © 2002 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #16472]

Quotes On Crucifixion

“Forgiving the unforgivable is hard. So was the cross: hard words, hard wood, hard nails.”

-- William S. Stoddard, quoted in Wisdom from a Pastor's Heart,

edited by Douglas Connelly

“Whoever heard of a suffering God? The idea is plain daft. God is up in heaven, and there he will stay. But wouldn't it be wonderful if it were true? If God came to visit us, like a great king visiting his subjects? Or, even better, if he came among us as one of us, sharing our way of life, with all its tragedy, sorrows and grief?”

-- Alister E. McGrath, What Was God Doing on the Cross?

“If we consider how utterly undeserved [the crucifixion] was, we call it grace; if we consider the cost, we call it atonement; if we consider the effect, we call it new life, redemption, sanctification.”

-- Austin Farrer, A Faith of Our Own

“The crucified is God's chosen: it is with the victim, the condemned, that God identifies, and it is in the company of the victim, so to speak, that God is to be found, and nowhere else….Jesus is judge because he is victim; and that very fact means that he is a judge who will not condemn.”

-- Rowan Williams, Resurrection

“Even from the cross, when our Lord in his agony found perfection of his saintly humanity—even then he did not own himself a victim of injustice: They know not what they do.”

-- Georges Bernanos, The Diary of a Country Priest

“We have become insensitive to the infinite tension which is implied in the words of the Apostles' Creed: "suffered…was crucified, dead, and buried…rose again from the dead." We already know, when we hear the first words, what the ending will be: "rose again," and for many people it is no more than the inevitable "happy ending."…But the answer of Easter had become possible precisely because the Christ has been buried. The new life would not really be new life if it did not come from the complete end of the old life.”

-- Paul Tillich, The Shaking of the Foundations

“The many strands of human experience run through the crossroads of the cross.”

-- Paul S. Fiddes, Past Event and Present Salvation

“Gracious God, the comfort of all who sorrow,

the strength of all who suffer,

hear the cry of those in misery and need.

In their afflictions show them your mercy,

and give us, we pray, the strength to serve them,

for the sake of him who suffered for us,

your Son, Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.”

-- Book of Common Worship

_____________

Copyright © 2002 Christianity Today. March 11, 2002, Vol. 46, No. 3, Page 69.

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #14706]

from Christianitytoday.com · Compiled by Richard A. Kauffman In Reflections: Crucifixion via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database good fridaycross

Triumph In Tragedy

Luke 23:26

Triumph In Tragedy

Read: Luke 23:26-56

When they had come to the place called Calvary, there they crucified Him. --Luke 23:33

We call it "Good Friday," but no one standing there that day would have called that Friday "good." The best man that history ever knew was nailed to a Roman cross and murdered. For His enemies it was a victory of sorts; for the soldiers it was simply another day's work; for His followers it was the death of their brightest hopes and greatest dreams. But no one would have called that Friday "good."

That is true of many "bad Fridays" if you consider them apart from Resurrection Sunday. They make life seem futile--without purpose and meaning. But God's most striking victories rise out of the graves of apparent defeats.

In his book Idols for Destruction, Herbert Schlossberg wrote, "We are not the lords of history and do not control its outcome, but we have assurance that there is a Lord of history and He controls its outcome. We need a theological interpretation of disaster, one that recognizes that God acts in such events as captivities, defeats, and crucifixions. The Bible can be interpreted as a string of God's triumphs disguised as disasters."

Face each day with trust in Jesus Christ. God's greatest victories often come disguised as defeats. --HWR

The purposes of God are right,

Although we may not see

Just how He works all things for good

And transforms tragedy. --Sper

God's most striking victories rise out of the graves of apparent defeats.

from Our Daily Bread, April 14, 1995 via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Triumph In Tragedy

Hebrews 11:35

Triumph In Tragedy

Read: Hebrews 11:35-40

This is my comfort in my affliction, for Your Word has given me life. --Psalm 119:50

Patricia St. John, who has been described as an ordinary woman with an extraordinary faith, poured out her life ministering to people in the neediest places on our planet. She was in Sudan when war refugees flooded that country. They had suffered terribly and had lost everything, yet those among them who were Christians still gave thanks to God.

Patricia said that she stood one night in a crowded little Sudanese church listening to those uprooted believers singing joyfully. Suddenly a life-changing insight burned its way into her mind. "We would have changed their circumstances," she said, "but we would not have changed them." She realized that God "does not always lift people out of the situation. He Himself comes into the situation. . . . He does not pluck them out of the darkness. He becomes the light in the darkness."

Does Patricia's insight apply to your life? What if, despite your fervent prayer, God doesn't see fit to deliver you from terrible circumstances? God's Word tells us that believers often suffer (Heb. 11:35-38). What then?

God promises to stand by you. He'll strengthen you and give you the grace to rejoice--even in the face of suffering and loss. That's real triumph in tragedy. --VCG

Do not fear the darkness that is gathering all around,

For the Lord is with you, and in Him true peace is found;

When you're facing trouble, and if tragedy comes near,

Jesus is the only one to drive away your fear. --Hess

The only way to be victorious is to have Christ reigning within.

from Our Daily Bread · David Heller (From His Book) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database good friday

Good Friday Had A Deeper Meaning For Him

Job 2:10

Rev. James Montgomery Boice was the pastor of Tenth Presbyterian Church in Philadelphia for 32 years. He was a noted Bible teacher on the radio and a statesman for Reformed theology. In 2000 he died just two months after being diagnosed with liver cancer. He was only 61 years old. He received his diagnosis on Good Friday and two hours later delivered a sermon on the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

Several weeks later, Boice informed his congregation of his condition and asked them, “If God does something in your life, would you change it? If you’d change it, you’d make it worse. It wouldn’t be as good.” He had total confidence that God’s plan was the best plan for him.

________

Adapted from “Bible teacher and statesman Boice dies,” Gettysburg Times, June 17, 2000.

*

[Original illustration at this number was added to HolwickID #18617]

from Source not recorded · Rev. David Holwick via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database cancerpredestination

Never Getting Over the Cross

Garrison Keillor, author of the nostalgic Lake Wobegon books, recalls his childhood Thanksgiving dinners, as the family gathered around the table and remembered the blessings of the past year. Uncle John usually gave the prayer, which caused everyone to squirm. As Keillor said, "Everybody in the family knew that Uncle John couldn't pray without talking about the cross and crying.... Sure enough, Uncle John prayed, talked about the cross, and cried. Meanwhile, the rest of us shifted nervously from one foot to the other and longed for the prayer to end."

Then Garrison Keillor adds this powerful observation: "All of us knew that Jesus died on the cross for us, but Uncle John had never gotten over it."

___________________

"Standing in the Light of the Cross" by Bill Bouknight, Good News Mar./Apr. 2002, p. 21.

He Loves Us So Deeply It Kills Him

"Jesus' message is not to be good boys and girls so that when you die you can go to heaven. The message of Jesus is 'I love you. I love you so deeply it kills me.'"

______________

Christian singer and songwriter Rich Mullins, cited in Les Sussman, Praise Him! (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998), p. 159.

from Source not recorded · Rich Mullins via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crossgod s love

Jesus Was Crucified By Stupidity

Harry Emerson Fosdick once said that Jesus was "Crucified by Stupidity." He said the leaders of the people had small, closed minds. The people themselves made stupid choices. And the whole Passion story of the gospels breathes with the stupidity of the short look.

from Source not recorded · Wayne Brouwer via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database good friday

Fined For Putting Up A Cross At Christmas

Luke 1:68

James Faison and his wife have lived in their community in Raleigh, North Carolina, for five years. In December 2020, they put up a six-foot cross in their yard to celebrate Christmas.

The Home Owners Association [HOA] then sent the family a letter saying the cross is not considered a Christmas decoration, but for Easter or Passover, so it needed to be removed or pay a $100 fine. When the Faisons questioned the violation, the HOA responded asking for scripture to connect the cross and Christmas. Despite their confusion, the Faisons provided biblical references to connect Christmas and the cross.

The HOA governing board responded with this statement:

“I did share your response with the Board and several members of the board are devout Christians and are intimately familiar with the cross being the foundation for which Christianity is based. The cross represents the death of Jesus Christ who died for our sins so we can have eternal life. The Christmas season is associated with the birth of the Savior such as nativity scenes would be appropriate representation of the season. The Board believes that the Bible is very clear on the distinction between these two major events in Christ’s life on earth. The cross is appropriate for display during the Easter season, but not as a decoration during the Christmas season. Unless biblical references can be provided noting the cross as a symbol of the Christmas season for the board to reconsider, the cross is not considered to be a Christmas decoration.”

The Faison family said the cross is a symbol of hope, and they’re not taking it down despite what their homeowners association says. Only after a local TV news station contacted the HOA did the board say the cross could stay up but they would still be reviewing the case.

What Is Crucifixion?

Mark 15:24

JESUS (CRUCIFIXION OF)

C. Truman Davis, M.D., in The Expositor's Bible Commentary writes:

What is crucifixion? A medical doctor provides a physical description: The cross is placed on the ground and the exhausted man is quickly thrown backwards with his shoulders against the wood. The legionnaire feels for the depression at the front of the wrist. He drives a heavy, square wrought-iron nail through the wrist and deep into the wood. Quickly he moves to the other side and repeats the action, being careful not to pull the arms too tightly, but to allow some flex and movement. The cross is then lifted into place.

The left foot is pressed backward against the right foot, and with both feet extended, toes down, a nail is driven through the arch of each, leaving the knees flexed. The victim is now crucified. As he slowly sags down with more weight on the nails in the wrists, excruciating, fiery pain shoots along the fingers and up the arms to explode in the brain-the nails in the wrists are putting pressure on the median nerves. As he pushes himself upward to avoid stretching torment, he places the full weight on the nail through his feet. Again he feels the searing agony of the nail tearing through the nerves between the bones of the feet.

As the arms fatigue, cramps sweep through the muscles, knotting them in deep, relentless, throbbing pain. With these cramps comes the inability to push himself upward to breathe. Air can be drawn into the lungs but not exhaled. He fights to raise himself in order to get even one small breath. Finally carbon dioxide builds up in the lungs and in the blood stream, and the cramps partially subside. Spasmodically he is able to push himself upward to exhale and bring in life-giving oxygen.

Hours of this limitless pain, cycles of twisting, joint-rending cramps, intermittent partial asphyxiation, searing pain as tissue is torn from his lacerated back as he moves up and down against the rough timber. Then another agony begins: a deep, crushing pain deep in the chest as the pericardium slowly fills with serum and begins to compress the heart.

It is now almost over-the loss of tissue fluids reached a critical level-the compressed heart is struggling to pump heavy, thick, sluggish blood into the tissues-the tortured lungs are making a frantic effort to gasp in small gulps of air.

He can feel the chill of death creeping through his tissues.... Finally, he can allow his body to die.

All this the Bible records with the simple words, "And they crucified him" (Mark 15:24).

What wondrous love is this?

Illustrations For Preaching & Teaching

Editor Craig Brian Larson, Baker Books, p. 50-51.

from Source not recorded · C. Truman Davis via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database eastergood friday

Easter Or Good Friday Or Gratitude*

LifeBridge Church in Longmont, Colorado, has adopted a community in Mexico. Preacher Rick Rusaw says, "As a result we have numerous mission trips that head to Nuevo Rosita, Mexico. On one trip with several vans, motor homes and numerous other vehicles held up by a stubborn border guard. One inspection officer finally said we will allow you to cross, just remember we have done you a favor. One of the young men in our congregation explained this to one of our guides who immediately went to the border guard and asked, "How thankful should I be?"

Good Friday is a wonderful reminder of how thankful I should be. That God has done each of us a favor and certainly deserves our gratitude. "How thankful should I be?" is a great question to ask this Good Friday."

TS: The border guard said $40 would be thankful enough. God's grace gift is free: we certainly have much to be thankful for.

Finished!

John 19:16

Finished!

Read: John 19:16-30

When Jesus had received the sour wine, He said, "It is finished!" And bowing His head, He gave up His spirit. --John 19:30

The Lord Jesus ended His work and suffering on the cross of Calvary with the words "It is finished!" (Jn. 19:30). In the original language in which John recorded these words, only one word is spoken by the Lord Jesus--tetelestai. Not three words but one--finished.

It was the cry of consummation, the cry of victory and of completion. In this one word, the Savior declared a fact, a truth so wonderful that Satan has been busy ever since trying to hide from the minds of men and women the meaning of Jesus' last triumphant cry.

As a result, there are millions of earnest, sincere, seeking souls who long for peace and rest but have not yet realized that salvation is a completed work. There is nothing more to be done. Yet these dear souls work and sacrifice, doing things they feel will merit for them the favor of God.

Stand with me once more before that cross. In that deep darkness when God hid His face, hear the Savior's powerful cry, "It is finished!" At that moment the earth shook, the rocks were split, and the graves were opened (Mt. 27:51-52). His work of salvation was complete. Aren't you glad you can say, "Praise God, it is finished for me!" --M. R. De Haan

Lifted up was He to die,

"It is finished," was His cry;

Now in heaven exalted high:

Hallelujah, what a Savior! --Bliss

Salvation cannot be earned; it must be accepted.

from Our Daily Bread, April 5, 1996 · [Dunbar, Gaffin, Meade, Snodgrass, Youngblood] via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

What's Good About It?

Matthew 27:41

What's Good About It?

Read: Matthew 27:41-54

We were reconciled to God through the death of His Son. --Romans 5:10

When faced with an ugly, unrelenting problem, we often cry, "I need a miracle!" A miracle may come, but if it doesn't, does that mean God's goodness isn't at work?

Let me ask another question: Why is Good Friday, the day Jesus hung on a cross, called "good"? If ever a miracle seemed appropriate, it was then. Even the mockers demanded, "If He is the King of Israel, let Him now come down from the cross, and we will believe Him" (Mt. 27:42). But Jesus didn't come down. Author Philip Yancey describes it as "a time of No Miracle."

Jesus certainly wasn't deserving of crucifixion. But God, in keeping with His loving purposes, used the evil that Jesus had to endure to accomplish the good that we so desperately needed--to be "reconciled to God through the death of His Son" (Rom. 5:10). That's why that awful day can be called "good."

Are you feeling that a miracle is your only hope of seeing God's goodness at work? Consider what Christ accomplished--not in spite of His sufferings but because of them. Also ponder Good Friday, Christ's day of "No Miracle." One day you'll be able to look back on the dark times in your life and honestly call them "good." --JEY

While Jesus hung on Calvary's cross,

The devil and his demons smiled;

Disciples grieved and mourned the loss,

But God and man were reconciled. --Sper

God uses life's reverses to move us forward.

from Our Daily Bread, March 30, 1999 via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database miraclecrucifixion

Savior Or Martyr? Christians Struggle With the Meaning of the Cross

Mark 10:45

His students are studying to be ministers and theologians. They've committed their lives to following Jesus' teachings.

But more and more, some reject the usual Christian talk about Jesus' death.

They don't consider Jesus a ransom for sin. They shudder at hymns glorifying the "power of the blood." They cringe at calling the day Jesus died Good Friday.

They say a God who requires human sacrifice sounds mean and vindictive. It doesn't mesh with their idea of a God who loves and forgives.

That's what Philip Lyndon Reynolds is increasingly up against as a theology professor at the United Methodist Candler School of Theology in Atlanta.

Theologians around the country tell the very same story.

It's a challenge pastors face, too, as Christians enter Holy Week, the most solemn time on the church calendar. Over the next few days, churches will recall Jesus' final days with Last Supper, Good Friday and Easter celebrations.

Belief that God's only Son died for the sins of humanity permeates Christian teaching. Good Friday, though a day focused on crucifixion, is called "good" because of what Christians believe Jesus' death accomplished: their redemption.

But placing so much emphasis on Jesus' death overshadows the message he proclaimed while he lived, say those troubled by atonement theology. It makes the crucifixion all about appeasing an angry God, they say.

"People don't think God needs to punish sin to forgive," said Scot McKnight, a biblical scholar at North Park University in Chicago, an Evangelical Covenant school. He, too, has heard the complaints.

"Some find it repulsive that one person could die for another," he said. "This is a modern distaste for atonement."

Christians who wince at atonement theology prefer to talk about Jesus as a martyr for his faith, and his death as a heroic sacrifice. He's the fullest expression of God's love, they say, and the ultimate manifestation of God on Earth.

These Christians defy easy labeling. They're young and old, conservative and liberal, and cross denominational lines. Their thinking is still a minority viewpoint, though no longer simmering only on the fringes of church life.

"People don't think of it as scandalous to reject atonement theology any more," said Father Michael Driscoll, a liturgical theologian at the University of Notre Dame.

Even Roman Catholics are playing down the transactional overtones of atonement theology, he said. But the theology is still evident in the Mass. Priests call Jesus "the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world."

THE BIBLE

Dr. Reynolds said his students don't relish thwarting Christian tradition.

"The problem is finding an account of Jesus' death that makes sense to them in a theological way," he said.

It's a growing 21st-century challenge, he said.

A key reason is that blood sacrifices are not part of American culture, Dr. McKnight said. People associate them with primitive societies, and not their day-to-day relationship with God.

"For many people, there is no 'power in the blood,'" he said. "It's just outside the modern orbit. They have to be taught about blood sacrifice. At first, it strikes them as ghastly."

Flipping through the pages of the Bible doesn't lend quick solutions. Christians won't find any verse in which Jesus explicitly claims to die for their sins, though he comes close.

"That wasn't the language Jesus used," Dr. McKnight said. "His language was not about individuals getting their sins forgiven so that they could get to heaven."

Jesus talked about the Kingdom of God – a concept broader than heaven and related to the fulfillment of Old Testament expectations. He spoke of the kingdom withast, present and future overtones, scholars say.

But atonement theology didn't just drop from the sky.

It's there, in the gospels and letters of the New Testament. These books provide the first glimpses of how early Christians understood Jesus' death.

Romans 3:25 states: Through his blood, God made him the means of expiation for all who believe. 1 Peter 2:24 is stronger: In his own body, he brought your sins to the cross.

The entire Letter to the Hebrews is riddled with sacrificial language about Jesus. The gospels, too, are packed with talk of Jesus' dying so others can have life.

"This sounds gory, but the Bible is a bloody book," Dr. McKnight said. "It's very clear in the New Testament that Jesus' death was understood as a sacrifice and his blood was understood as atoning."

Christians who dismiss atonement theology don't give great weight to these passages. They see them as theology, not history, and note that they were written several years after Jesus' death – points few scholars dispute.

"The only texts we have are written from the stance of the Christian faith," said Jaime Clark-Soles, a New Testament scholar at the Perkins School of Theology in Dallas, and an American Baptist minister.

During her years as a student at Yale, she said, some classmates complained that atonement was theologically "grizzly." Too much blood and gore, they said.

But she didn't flinch.

"The salvific death of Jesus is pretty central to Christian theology and people in the pews," she said. "If you read the New Testament, especially the gospels, you get atonement."

OTHER VIEWS

Dr. Reynolds' students are turning to the past for an alternative view.

They're finding it in a theory put forth by Peter Abelard in the Middle Ages. Rather than a sacrifice for sin, he said that Jesus was a role model whose suffering was exemplary.

Some Bible scholars today also assert that Jesus died primarily as a martyr for his beliefs. One of them is Duane Friesen, who teaches at Bethel College, a Mennonite school in North Newton, Kansas.

He argues that Jesus died for the message he proclaimed on behalf of the poor and marginalized. Jesus stood against the kingdoms of this world on behalf of the Kingdom of God, he said.

"The salvation he brings is a transformation of the social order," he said. "But atonement theology makes Jesus' death all about changing God's attitude toward us, so we can get to heaven."

Lanny Mullins disagrees. If Jesus didn't atone for sin, then his death is meaningless, said the associate minister of the Skillman Road Church of Christ in Dallas.

He also takes issue with those who characterize atonement theory as some sort of cosmic child abuse. His views reflect the dominant Christian viewpoint on atonement.

"Death is always a gruesome act," he said. "But we have sinful blood coursing through our veins. A pure sacrifice had to be given to God. Christ's blood is pure."

Atonement theology is rooted in three theories from the early church. Most modern thinking is a mixture of these theories:

• Ransom theory: Jesus' death was a ransom paid to release humanity from Satan's grip. This view was the most prevalent until the Middle Ages.

• Satisfaction theory: Jesus embraced death to make amends for the offenses of humanity and, in doing so, satisfied God's honor. This theory was popularized in Middle Ages by Anselm of Cantebury's treatise, CUR DEUS HOMO ("Why God Became Man").

• Sacrificial theory: Jesus is the unblemished lamb sacrificed for the sin of humanity. This theory draws on views of animal sacrifice as a sin offering to God found in the Hebrew Bible, or Old Testament.

The modern problem with atonement, writes Catholic theologian Gerald O'Collins, is that some churches have taken the theories to extremes never intended. In doing so, they make Jesus' death seem a response to God's anger rather than to human cruelty.

"While sometimes speaking of the divine anger, the New Testament never associates that anger with Christ's suffering and death," said Father O'Collins, who teaches at the Gregorian University in Rome.

JESUS' VIEW

Jesus died on a criminal's cross, which is fitting because capital punishment theory most closely resembles atonement theory today, according to Arthur Dewey, who teaches theology at Xavier University in Cincinnati.

"Atonement theory basically considers people expendable for the good of society," he said. "This notion of sacrifice was embedded in the culture that Jesus lived."

The Gospel of Mark (10:45) suggests that Jesus understood his death as a "ransom for many." In Mark 14:24, Jesus said, This is my blood, the blood of the covenant, to be poured out on behalf of many.

Even so, many scholars shy from speculating about whether Jesus anticipated his death or what meaning he attached to it.

"People read between the lines of the gospels," said Daryl Schmidt, a historian at Texas Christian University in Fort Worth. "But Jesus never wrote anything, so we can't know what he was really thinking."

But Dr. McKnight suspects that how Jesus understood his death may be significant to understanding his mission. It's a question historical scholars have largely ignored, he said.

"To me, it's a pity," he said, "because it creates an incredible imbalance that all New Testament atonement theology comes from early Christianity and nothing from Jesus."

Jesus spent the last days of his life in Jerusalem, according to the gospels. There's an ominous tone to the writing, signaling the tragedy about to befall him.

Paula Fredriksen, a historian of ancient Christianity, doesn't think Jesus expected to be arrested. When taken to the high priest, he asked why he was being questioned since he'd always taught openly rather than in secret (John 18:21-24).

"His disciples act very shocked, demoralized and unprepared," said the Boston University professor. "That implies to me that Jesus' arrest came as a shock to him."

Marcus Borg, who teaches at Oregon State University and writes best-selling books on Jesus, said the gospels show Jesus not only speaking of his death, but insisting that it had to happen.

But Dr. Borg doubts that Jesus understood his death as atoning. He says Jesus probably knew that he risked execution if he continued teaching and aggravating the religious authorities in Jerusalem.

"He may well have known that his journey to Jerusalem could end in his death," Dr. Borg, an Episcopalian, writes in The Meaning of Jesus. "But that is very different from saying that he saw his death as central to his purpose."

Dr. McKnight said that Jesus entered Jerusalem knowing he was going to die and that his death had a larger, saving purpose.

"Otherwise, he would have high-tailed it back to Galilee," he said. "Jesus had to have believed that his death was the way God was going to redeem his people."

Dr. Dewey said the gospels don't reflect a single viewpoint on how early Christians interpreted Jesus' death. The Q sayings, which many scholars say that Matthew, Mark and Luke used to write their narratives, portray Christians as more interested in Jesus' vision of the Kingdom of God than in atonement.

"Christians then, like Christians today, had different ways of making sense of Jesus' death," he said.

"Atonement theory is one way of saying God is somehow present in that death."

Medical Account of Crucifixion: A Physician Testifies About the Crucifixion

Mark 15:22

Medical Account of Crucifixion

by Dr. C. Truman Davis

Brought to you by:

The Youth Ministry Newsletter Exchange

http://www.cm-online.net/ym

A Physician Testifies About the Crucifixion

About a decade ago, reading Jim Bishop's “The Day Christ Died”, I realized that I had for years taken the Crucifixion more or less for granted -- that I had grown callous to its horror by a too easy familiarity with the grim details and a too distant friendship with our Lord. It finally occurred to me that, though a physician, I didn't even know the actual immediate cause of death. The Gospel writers don't help us much on this point, because crucifixion and scourging were so common during their lifetime that they apparently considered a detailed description unnecessary. So we have only the concise words of the Evangelists: “Pilate, having scourged Jesus, delivered Him to them to be crucified -- and they crucified Him.”

I have no competence to discuss the infinite psychic and spiritual suffering of the Incarnate God atoning for the sins of fallen man. But it seemed to me that as a physician I might pursue the physiological and anatomical aspects of our Lord's passionate some detail. What did the body of Jesus of Nazareth actually endure during those hours of torture?

This led me first to a study of the practice of crucifixion itself; that is, torture and execution by fixation to a cross. I am indebted to many who have studied this subject in the past, and especially to a contemporary colleague, Dr. Pierre Barbet, a French surgeon who has done exhaustive historical and experimental research and has written extensively on the subject.

Apparently, the first known practice of crucifixion was by the Persians. Alexander and his generals brought it back to the Mediterranean world -- to Egypt and to Carthage. The Romans apparently learned the practice from the Carthaginians and (as with almost everything the Romans did) rapidly developed a very high degree of efficiency and skill at it. A number of Roman authors (Livy, Cicer, Tacitus) comment on crucifixion, and several innovations, modifications, and variations are described in the ancient literature.

For instance, the upright portion of the cross (or stipes) could have the cross-arm (or patibulum) attached two or three feet below its topiin what we commonly think of as the Latin cross. The most common form used in our Lord's day, however, was the Tau cross, shaped like our T. In this cross the patibulum was placed in a notch at the top of the stipes. There is archeological evidence that it was on this type of cross that Jesus was crucified.

Without any historical or biblical proof, Medieval and Renaissance painters have given us our picture of Christ carrying the entire cross. But the upright post, or stipes, was generally fixed permanently in the ground at the site of execution and the condemned man was forced to carry the patibulum, weighing about 110 pounds, from the prison to the place of execution.

Many of the painters and most of the sculptors of crucifixion, also show the nails through the palms. Historical Roman accounts and experimental work have established that the nails were driven between the small bones of the wrists (radial and ulna) and not through the palms. Nails driven through the palms will strip out between the fingers when made to support the weight of the human body. The misconception may have come about through a misunderstanding of Jesus' words to Thomas, “Observe my hands.” Anatomists, both modern and ancient, have always considered the wrist as part of the hand.

A titulus, or small sign, stating the victim's crime was usually placed on a staff, carried at the front of the procession from the prison, and later nailed to the cross so that it extended above the head. This sign with its staff nailed to the top of the cross would have given it somewhat the characteristic form of the Latin cross.

But, of course, the physical passion of the Christ began in Gethsemane. Of the many aspects of this initial suffering, the one of greatest physiological interest is the bloody sweat. It is interesting that St. Luke, the physician, is the only one to mention this. He says, “And being in Agony, He prayed the longer. And His sweat became as drops of blood, trickling down upon the ground.” Every ruse (trick) imaginable has been used by modern scholars to explain away this description, apparently under the mistaken impression that this just doesn't happen. A great deal of effort could have been saved had the doubters consulted the medical literature. Though very rare, the phenomenon of Hematidrosis, or bloody sweat, is well documented. Under great emotional stress of the kind our Lord suffered, tiny capillaries in the sweat glands can break, thus mixing blood with sweat. This process might well have produced marked weakness and possible shock.

After the arrest in the middle of the night, Jesus was next brought before the Sanhedrin and Caiphus, the High Priest; it is here that the first physical trauma was inflicted. A soldier struck Jesus across the face for remaining silent when questioned by Caiphus. The palace guards then blind-folded Him and mockingly taunted Him to identify them as they each passed by, spat upon Him, and struck Him in the face.

In the early morning, battered and bruised, dehydrated, and exhausted from a sleepless night, Jesus is taken across the Praetorium of the Fortress Antonia, the seat of government of the Procurator of Judea, Pontius Pilate. You are, of course, familiar with Pilate's action in attempting to pass responsibility to Herod Antipas, the Tetrarch of Judea. Jesus apparently suffered no physical mistreatment at the hands of Herod and was returned to Pilate. It was then, in response to thecries of the mob, that Pilate ordered Bar-Abbas released and condemned Jesus to scourging and crucifixion.

There is much disagreement among authorities about the unusual scourging as a prelude to crucifixion. Most Roman writers from this period do not associate the two. Many scholars believe that Pilate originally ordered Jesus scourged as his full punishment and that the death sentence by crucifixion came only in response to the taunt by the mob that the Procurator was not properly defending Caesar against this pretender who allegedly claimed to be the King of the Jews.

Preparations for the scourging were carried out when the Prisoner was stripped of His clothing and His hands tied to a post above His head. It is doubtful the Romans would have made any attempt to follow the Jewish law in this matter, but the Jews had an ancient law prohibiting more than forty lashes.

The Roman legionnaire steps forward with the flagrum (or flagellum) in his hand. This is a short whip consisting of several heavy, leather thongs with two small balls of lead attached near the ends of each. The heavy whip is brought down with full force again and again across Jesus' shoulders, back, and legs. At first the thongs cut through the skin only. Then, as the blows continue, they cut deeper into the subcutaneous tissues, producing first an oozing of blood from the capillaries and veins of the skin, and finally spurting arterial bleeding from vessels in the underlying muscles.

The small balls of lead first produce large, deep bruises which are broken open by subsequent blows. Finally the skin of the back is hanging in long ribbons and the entire area is an unrecognizable mass of torn, bleeding tissue. When it is determined by the centurion in charge that the prisoner is near death, the beating is finally stopped.

The half-fainting Jesus is then untied and allowed to slump to the stone pavement, wet with His own blood. The Roman soldiers see a great joke in this provincial Jew claiming to be king. They throw a robe across His shoulders and place a stick in His hand for a scepter. They still need a crown to make their travesty complete. Flexible branch covered with long thorns (commonly used in bundles for firewood) are plaited into the shape of a crown and this is pressed into His scalp. Again there is copious bleeding, the scalp being one of the most vascular areas of the body.

After mocking Him and striking Him across the face, the soldiers take the stick from His hand and strike Him across the head, driving the thorns deeper into His scalp. Finally, they tire of their sadistic sport and the robe is torn from His back. Already having adhered to the clots of blood and serum in the wounds, its removal causes excruciating pain just as in the careless removal of a surgical bandage, and almost as though He were again being whipped the wounds once more begin to bleed.

In deference to Jewish custom, the Romans return His garments. The heavy patibulum of the cross is tied across His shoulders, and the procession of the condemned Christ, two thieves, and the execution detail of Roman soldiers headed by a centurion begins its slow journey along the Via Dolorosa. In spite of His efforts to walk erect, the weight of the heavy wooden beam, together with the shock produced by copious blood loss, is too much. He stumbles and falls. The rough wood of the beam gouges into the lacerated skin and muscles of the shoulders. He tries to rise, but human muscles have been pushed beyond their endurance.

The centurion, anxious to get on with the crucifixion, selects a stalwart North African onlooker, Simon of Cyrene, to carry the cross. Jesus follows, still bleeding and sweating the cold, clammy sweat of shock, until the 650 yard journey from the fortress Antonia to Golgotha is finally completed.

Jesus is offered wine mixed with myrrh, a mild analgesic mixture. He refuses to drink. Simon is ordered to place the patibulum on the ground and Jesus quickly thrown backward with His shoulders against the wood. The legionnaire feels for the depression at the front of the wrist. He drives a heavy, square, wrought-iron nail through the wrist and deep into the wood. Quickly, he moves to the other side and repeats the action being careful not to pull the arms to tightly, but to allow some flexion and movement.

The patibulum is then lifted in place at the top of the stipes and the titulus reading “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews” is nailed in place. The left foot is now pressed backward against the right foot, and with both feet extended, toes down, a nail is driven through the arch of each, leaving the knees moderately flexed. The Victim is now crucified. As He slowly sags down with more weight on the nails in the wrists excruciating pain shoots along the fingers and up the arms to explode in the brain -- the nails in the wrists are putting pressure on the median nerves. As He pushes Himself upward to avoid this stretching torment, He places His full weight on the nail through His feet. Again there is the searing agony of the nail tearing through the nerves between the metatarsal bones of the feet.

At this point, as the arms fatigue, great waves of cramps sweep over the muscles, knotting them in deep, relentless, throbbing pain. With these cramps comes the inability to push Himself upward. Hanging by his arms, the pectoral muscles are paralyzed and the intercostal muscles are unable to act. Air can be drawn into the lungs, but cannot be exhaled. Jesus fights to raise Himself in order to get even one short breath. Finally, carbon dioxide builds up in the lungs and in the blood stream and the cramps partially subside. Spasmodically, he is able to push Himself upward to exhale and bring in the life-giving oxygen. It was undoubtedly during these periods that He uttered the seven short sentences recorded:

The first, looking down at the Roman soldiers throwing dice for His seamless garment, “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.” The second, to the penitent thief, “Today thou shalt be with me in Paradise.” The third, looking down at the terrified, grief-stricken adolescent John - the beloved Apostle - he said, “Behold thy mother.” Then, looking to His mother Mary, “Woman behold thy son.”

The fourth cry is from the beginning of the 22nd Psalm, “My God, my God, why has thou forsaken me?”

Hours of limitless pain, cycles of twisting, joint-rending cramps, intermittent partial asphyxiation, searing pain where tissue is torn from His lacerated back as He moves up and down against the rough timber. Then another agony begins. A terrible crushing pain deep in the chest as the pericardium slowly fills with serum and begins to compress the heart.

One remembers again the 22nd Psalm, the 14th verse: “I am poured out like water, and all my bones are out of joint; my heart is like wax; it is melted in the midst of my bowels.”

It is now almost over. The loss of tissue fluids has reached a critical level; the compressed heart is struggling to pump heavy, thick, sluggish blood into the tissue; the tortured lungs are making a frantic effort to gasp in small gulps of air. The markedly dehydrated tissues send their flood of stimuli to the brain.

Jesus gasps His fifth cry, “I thirst.”

One remembers another verse from the prophetic 22nd Psalm: “My strength is dried up like a potsherd; and my tongue cleaveth to my jaws; and thou has brought me into the dust of death.”

A sponge soaked in posca, the cheap, sour wine which is the staple drink of the Roman legionaries, is lifted to His lips. He apparently doesn't take any of the liquid. The body of Jesus is now in extremes, and He can feel the chill of death creeping through His tissues. This realization brings out His sixth words, possibly little more than a tortured whisper, “It is finished.”

His mission of atonement has completed. Finally He can allow his body to die. With one last surge of strength, he once again presses His torn feet against the nail, straightens His legs, takes a deeper breath, and utters His seventh and last cry, “Father! Into thy hands I commit my spirit.”

The rest you know. In order that the Sabbath not be profaned, the Jews asked that the condemned men be dispatched and removed from the crosses. The common method of ending a crucifixion was by crurifracture, the breaking of the bones of the legs. This prevented the victim from pushing himself upward; thus the tension could not be relieved from the muscles of the chest and rapid suffocation occurred. The legs of the two thieves were broken, but when the soldiers came to Jesus they saw that this was unnecessary.

Apparently to make doubly sure of death, the legionnaire drove his lance through the fifth interspace between the ribs, upward through the pericardium and into the heart. The 34th verse of the 19th chapter of the Gospel according to St. John reports: “And immediately there came out blood and water.” That is, there was an escape of water fluid from the sac surrounding the heart, giving postmortem evidence that Our Lord died not the usual crucifixion death by suffocation, but of heart failure (a broken heart) due to shock and constriction of the heart by fluid in the pericardium.

Thus we have had our glimpse - including the medical evidence - of that epitome of evil which man has exhibited toward Man and toward God. It has been a terrible sight, and more than enough to leave us despondent and depressed. How grateful we can be that we have the great sequel in the infinite mercy of God toward man - at once the miracle of the atonement and the expectation of the triumphant Easter morning.

________

Dr. C. Truman Davis is a nationally respected Ophthalmologist, vice president of the American Association of Ophthalmology, and an active figure in the Christian schools movement. He is founder and president of the excellent Trinity Christian School in Mesa Arizona, and a trustee of Grove City College.

================================================

Similar material from SermonCentral.com, 3/27/06:

The author Lee Strobel has written a book titled GOD’S OUTRAGEOUS CLAIMS. In it he writes these words:

Jesus was tied to a post and beaten at least thirty-nine times – and probably more – with a whip that had jagged bones and balls of lead woven into it. Again and again the whip was brought down with full force on his bare shoulders, back, and legs ...At first the heavy thongs cut through skin only. Then, as the blows continued, they cut deeper into the subcutaneous tissues, producing first and oozing of blood from the capillaries and veins of the skin, and finally spurting arterial bleeding from vessels in the underlying muscles. The small balls of lead first produce large, deep bruises which are broken open by subsequent blows. Finally, the skin of the back is hanging in long ribbons, and the entire area is an unrecognizable mass of torn, bleeding tissue. One witness to a Roman flogging gave this description: “The sufferer’s veins were laid bare, and the very muscles and tendons and bowels of the victim were open to exposure.”

________

Contributed by David Haun

The Magnetism of the Cross

John 12:27

Good Friday sermon on the cross. John 12:27-33

THE MAGNETISM OF THE CROSS

==========================

John 12:32 - "When I am lifted up, I will draw all men to myself."

I. My mother, the ambulance-chaser.

II. We are attracted to disaster and cruelty.

A. Biggest tourist attraction in New York City - Ground Zero.

B. If Jesus were hanging on our sanctuary cross, would you look?

C. There is no attraction like that to the cross.

III. Comparison with snake in wilderness. Numbers 21:4-9

A. Complaining on the journey.

B. They, and us, have been unfaithful to God.

C. Unusual remedy - look at snake on a pole.

IV. Someone has taken our place.

A. Television testimony.

B. There is no greater message than a substitute.

C. The Cross is a tool of death, not a piece of shiny jewelry.

V. We "play church" a lot.

A. Our churches are beautiful and comfortable.

B. People want the cross.

[Adapted from sermon #15827 by Rev. Harold Armstrong]

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, Goodfr02.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database good friday

The Truth About Everything: Death On A Friday Afternoon

Mark 15:15

Easter for many of us is a day of family gatherings and a celebration, not only of Christ's resurrection, but also the coming of spring. In this week before Easter, though, let's not rush the celebration before coming face-to-face with the paradoxes that are at the heart of the Christian faith.

Those paradoxes are the subject of a wonderful book DEATH ON A FRIDAY AFTERNOON: MEDITATIONS ON THE LAST WORDS OF JESUS by my friend Father Richard John Neuhaus.

A paradox, as G. K. Chesterton famously put it, is “Truth standing on her head to get attention.” Our aversion and resistance to the truth is so strong that God often finds it necessary to employ extreme measures to get us to see past the lies we've embraced.

Never was this truer than on what Christians call “Good Friday.” As Neuhaus writes, “If what Christians say about Good Friday is true, then it is, quite simply, the truth about everything.” That “everything” starts with telling the truth about the human condition. How? By paradoxically punishing the offended party, instead of the guilty.

As Neuhaus tells us, we are all aware that “something has gone terribly wrong with the world, and with us in the world.” It is not just history's best-known list of horribles. It's also “the habits of compromise ... loves betrayed ... lies excused ... “

Yet, instead of acknowledging our complicity in the world's evil, we minimize our own faults and regard our sins as “small.” Good Friday puts the lie to that claim. If the Son of God had to suffer such a horrible death, then our sins cannot have been “small.”

The Cross reminds us that “our lives are measured,” not by us or by our peers, but “by whom we are created and called to be, and the measuring is done by the One who creates and calls.” Instead of glossing over our sin with an understanding nod, the Cross renders “the verdict on the gravity of our sin.”

Our unwillingness to see our sins as they really are, as God sees them, leads us to embrace another falsehood: that is, that we can make things right. Even though our culture is, in many respects, post-Christian, it still clings to the idea of redemption. However, just as with our ideas about sin and guilt, our ideas about redemption are pitiful and impoverished.

On Good Friday, God made it clear “that we are incapable of setting things right.” He made it clear by taking our place. On the Cross, “the Judge of the guilty is Himself judged guilty.” This is, of course, the great scandal, one that paradoxically points to the great truth at the heart of Good Friday: We are powerless to set things right, and only God, the offended party, could undo the mess we created.

The Cross — God's way of bearing witness to the truth about our condition — is as offensive today as it was two thousand years ago. Now, as then, we insist on misinterpreting the events of that Friday afternoon, but to no avail. Our sin has been judged, and God Himself bore the punishment. And that is the truth about everything.

________

Copyright (c) 2005 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

[Original illustration at this number was added to HolwickID #15904]

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crossatonementparadox

The Cross of Christ - Key To Salvation

A little girl once begged a famous preacher to visit her dying mother. “Come and get my mother in,” she pleaded. He followed the girl to a slum tenement, and sitting by the mother’s bed began to speak of the beautiful example of Christ. But the woman interrupted him saying, “That’s no good, mister, no good for the likes of me. I’m a poor sinner and I’m dying!”

He was one of those preachers who did not think it proper to speak of the cross and the blood of Christ. But he remembered the simple story of Jesus dying on the cross, which he had heard from his mother, and he explained it all to the woman. “Now,” she cried, “you’re getting at it! That’s the story for me!”

The minister said afterward, “The gospel message got her in, and got me in, too!” That’s the message that can bring salvation - the cross of Christ.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database good friday

Three Words At the Cross

There are three words that came together at Calvary: Justice, Mercy and Grace.

1. Justice is getting what we deserve.

2. Mercy is not getting what we deserve.

3. Grace is getting what we don’t deserve.

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #6265]

The Greek Passion

The Greek writer Nikos Kazantzakis is perhaps best remembered as the author of ZORBA, THE GREEK, which was the source of a popular film made some forty years ago. He also wrote a somewhat more controversial book, THE LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST, which led to his excommunication by the Greek Orthodox Church. Yet another of his books - one far less well known - is one my favorite books.

THE GREEK PASSION describes a year in the lives of the inhabitants of the small village of Lycovrissi during the time of the Turkish occupation of Greece. Each year these people act out the story of Christ's Passion for one another, both in honor and in anticipation of the celebration of Easter. It takes the villagers almost a year to prepare for this village play.

Father Grigoris takes pains to assign the roles that people will play the following year. It is his hope that those chosen will strengthen their faith as they prepare themselves to portray the apostles, the Magdalene, Jesus, and even Judas.

But Fr. Grigoris is mistaken if he thinks his parishioners can strengthen their own faith. For while almost from the very beginning of the story the people are strengthened, even transformed, it is not their own doing. For it seems that instead of filling the roles, the villagers are themselves filled by the roles. The passions, strengths, weaknesses, hopes, expectations, fears and failings of Jesus' followers all become evident in the lives of these simple people. And before long we see the passion acted out, not on the stage, but in the lives and the relationships of every resident of the small village.

Kazantzakis understood that Christ's sacrificial death and resurrection happened once for all time in Palestine. But he also understood that the cycle of death and resurrection is played out again and again in the lives of Jesus' followers. As we tell and retell Jesus' story year after year, we do not just come to know the story, we are also known by the story. The Passion is not a story we can contain or possess -instead it contains us, and in possessing us it reveals us as we are, and as God would have us be.

Kazantakis understood that the story of Jesus bound him to his people, just as it bound his people to one another. And that's what Christians are, a people united in Christ and with one another. Which is why we gather on Easter Day, and every Lord's Day, to hear and tell the story that not only helps us to know who God is, but also helps us to know ourselves. Christ is Risen! Christ is Risen Indeed!

[P.S. I was happy to read several years ago that the Greek Orthodox Church had reconsidered Kazantakis' excommunication. Acknowledging that his work was not so well understood when first published, they restored him, posthumously, into the communion of the faithful.]

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate in KeruxID 25837-26027]

from Church Newsletter · Rev. Peter Magnan, Succasunna Presbyterian Church, New Jersey via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database good friday

Some Questions To Ask About the Passion of Jesus

John 3:16

Mel Gibson’s movie, “The Passion of The Christ,” generated much interest – and controversy. The controversy is generated not so much by the movie but by the event it is founded upon: the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. The following questions will help in thinking through the Passion of Jesus and discussing it with others.

1. Do you know why Jesus had to die?

When learning the facts of the Passion of Christ, it is essential to understand the reason for it. One of the most important of the many reasons given in the Bible why Jesus had to die was to receive the wrath of God in the place of others. “For all have sinned,” God says in Romans 3:23. And because God is just and holy, He must punish those who have sinned. But because He also is loving, He was willing to send His Son -- Jesus -- to take the hammer blow of His wrath so that others might receive His mercy. When Jesus allowed Himself to be spiked onto that wooden cross, He was accepting God's curse so that sinners could receive God's blessings forever. As Galatians 3:13 puts it, “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us -- for it is written, 'Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree.'“

2. Do you know who really killed Jesus?

There is no single, earthly source to blame for killing Jesus. The Jewish religious leaders hated Jesus, so they arrested Him and delivered Him to the Roman official, Pontius Pilate, for execution. Pilate could have released Jesus, but he, too, shares responsibility because he succumbed to the influence of yet a third party who contributed to the death of Jesus, the crowd in Jerusalem who kept shouting, “Crucify Him!” (Matthew 27:23). In the end, however, it was sinners like me and you who killed Jesus. “While we were yet sinners,” the Apostle Paul tells us, “Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8). No one can point a finger at any other person or group for the death of Jesus. Our sins were the reason Jesus had to be crucified.

3. Do you understand the role that God the Father played in the death of Jesus?

Ultimately, it was God the Father who killed His Son, Jesus. The Bible clearly says that Jesus was “delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God” (Acts 2:23). Jesus did not die by mistake. Although our sins made Jesus' death necessary, God brought it to pass. So in God's sending Jesus to receive His wrath so others could receive eternal life, sinners are saved from God, by God.

4. Do you realize why Jesus' death was different from the death of everyone else in history?

The death of Jesus was unique because His life was unique. Since Jesus never sinned, He never had to die; He chose to die. And because Jesus never broke the law of God, He could die as a substitute for lawbreakers. As 2 Corinthians 5:21 explains, God the Father “made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him (2 Corinthians 5:21).

5. Do you know why Jesus cried from the cross, “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?” (Matthew 27:46)?

When God in His justice laid the crushing guilt of sinners upon Jesus, God in His holiness then had to reject His own Son as a sinner. As Jesus was suspended between earth and heaven, the prophecy of Isaiah 53:10 was fulfilled: “But the Lord was pleased to crush Him, putting Him to grief if He would render Himself as a guilt offering.”

6. Do you know why Jesus' last words were, “It is finished” (John 19:30)?

Because of His love, God sent Jesus to be the propitiation -- the wrath- taker -- for the sins of people who did not yet love Him. “In this is love,” 1 John 4:10 says, “not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.” Once He had taken our guilt and God's punishment, Jesus triumphantly declared to His Father, “It is finished,” and died.

7. Do you see the relationship between Jesus' death and His resurrection?

The resurrection of Jesus vindicates all His claims. Anyone could claim, as Jesus did, to be the only way to God (John 14:6). But Jesus substantiated this and all His other claims by doing something no one else has ever done -- rising from the dead, never to die again. Moreover, by not leaving Jesus in the grave, God showed that He accepted His Son's death as a substitute for the death of others. The Bible is plain that the cross of Jesus, without the resurrection, would have meant, “your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins” (1 Corinthians 15:17). “But now Christ has been raised from the dead” (1 Corinthians 15:20), as proof that Jesus' death in the place of sinners satisfied the requirements of God's justice.

8. Do you realize what the death of Jesus can do for you that you cannot do for yourself?

First among many things is this: The death of Jesus can make you righteous in the sight of God. No amount of good that we do can atone for our sins or earn us a place in heaven. And if we die without receiving the benefit of Jesus' death, the wrath of God will fall on us forever. Conversely, the Bible speaks of those who have experienced the benefit of the cross as those who have “been justified by His blood,” and declares that they “shall be saved from the wrath of God through Him” (Romans 5:9). To be “justified” means more than having all sins forgiven. It also means to be given credit for living the perfect life Jesus lived. Only a perfect life earns entrance into a perfect world with a perfect God. And only through the death of Jesus can we get the perfect life of Jesus that we need to enter heaven.

9. Do you understand the central message of the Passion of Jesus?

Jesus Christ, the sinless Son of God, was crucified as a substitute for sinners, and He rose from the dead to be King over everyone and everything forever.

The Passion is summarized in one of the best-known and best-loved verses in the Bible: “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life” (John 3:16).

Find Your Way Home

John 3:16

Nothing in my existence could have prepared me for what I saw on screen last night. There isn't even a sense that one has just watched a movie. It is an experience on a level of primary emotion that is scarcely comprehensible. Those were the raw feelings expressed by a big-city news anchor after watching The Passion of the Christ. She put into words what many of us who witnessed this movie have felt.

After an advance showing, Paul Harvey described the silence and the sobbing of the roomful of movers and shakers at the end of the movie. And speaking for himself, Paul Harvey said, “Frankly, I will never be the same.” [but see below] Mel Gibson said, “Everyone who worked on this movie was changed.”

It is almost impossible to remain unmoved and unchanged when you see before your eyes what Mel Gibson calls the enormity of His sacrifice. The impact we feel is because we finally realize that this cross of Jesus is so much more than just a historical event or a religious event. It's a deeply personal event one that can lead us to the spiritual homecoming that has eluded us for so long. Like a little boy lost.

Scotty was only four years old and lost in Brooklyn. A police officer spotted the little guy standing on a street corner, crying. He tried to help the boy by asking him has address which he didn't know. Then his phone number which couldn't remember.

The officer was about to take him down to the police station when he thought of one final question - Little boy, is there anything near your house that I might recognize? For the first time, the child s eyes brightened. Yeah, he said. Next to my house, there's this big church, and it's got a big cross on the top. And, mister, if you can get me to the cross, I can find my way home.

So can you. Home to the love we look for our whole lives ... to the relationship that will finally fill the hole in your heart. And, one day, home to the heaven we all want to go to but none of us deserves. But finding the way home means first getting to the cross.

Not long ago, two men on an airplane were discussing their spiritual journeys. One said, As a young man, I left the church I'd been raised in to go on my own personal search for God. I've tried many religions, many spiritualities. Nothing ever satisfied my soul.

Then the man brightened as he related the surprising and abrupt way in which his quest found its answer. One day I stepped back into the church I'd grown up in. I was the only one there. Up in front, I saw the cross I'd looked at so many times as a kid. But suddenly something hit me that I had missed all these years. I found myself saying, “For me. That cross was for me.” That's where his long search finally ended.

That's where the spiritual search of millions has ended. Looking at that cross, seeing what Jesus did there, and suddenly saying those two words that change everything for me. What You did there, Jesus, is for me, isn't it? You're loving me there. You're dying there to pay my penalty for all my sin. Mel Gibson put it this way: “The full horror of what Jesus suffered for our redemption didn't really strike me. But when you finally see it, it makes you feel not only compassion, but also a debt.” You want to repay Him. You want to love Him in return.”

One bright light pointing the way to Him is what may be the twenty-six most important words in the Bible words you may have heard a thousand times or possibly never before. What matters is reading them now as if your life depends on them it does.

“For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life.” - John 3:16

Yes, God loved the world by giving the most heart-rending gift He could possibly give His one and only Son. But the whoever brings His unspeakable sacrifice down to just one person. Facing the horror and the wonder of Jesus death on the cross, one Bible writer bottom lines it this way: “He loved me and gave Himself for me” (Galatians 2:20). Something amazing happens in your heart when you imagine yourself at the foot of Jesus cross and you say, “For me.”

Those twenty-six life-or-death words of John 3:16 spell out the alternative to a personal response to Jesus sacrifice. Whoever believes in Him shall not perish. The chilling fact is that, according to the Bible, every one of us has hijacked our life from the One who gave it to us and spiritual hijacking carries an eternal death penalty. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way ... your iniquities (all your wrongdoing) have separated you from your God ... for the wages of sin is death (Isaiah 53:6; Isaiah 59:2; Romans 6:23).

Even without reading the Bible, we know deep down inside that we've got trouble with God and that we need to do something about it or face some awful consequences. So we do good things, religious things to try to make things right with the One we will face after we take our last breath. But a death penalty cannot be paid by doing good. So it's possible to have lots of Christianity and to miss Christ. There's only one way a death penalty can be paid somebody has to die.

And Somebody did. On Skull Hill, that dark Friday afternoon. No one could take the life of the Son of God He would have to give it. And He did, in such an unspeakably awful way that the Romans had to invent a new way to describe the horror of crucifixion ex cruces from the cross. Today we describe unbearable pain as excruciating. Ex cruces. The most horrific pain of all. Suffered for you.

But the real hell of that cross was the moment when Jesus cried out, “My God, my God, why have You forsaken Me?” In that most devastating of all human experience, God the Father turned His back on His only Son. So He would never have to turn His back on you. Hell is eternal separation from God. Jesus took that so you don't ever have to. The real passion of Christ is loving you too much to lose you! Three days after Jesus died, history tells us that He walked out of His grave under His own power! Which means you can have a personal relationship with Him. Not a religion about Him, but a relationship with Him.

If you will make personal what He did on that cross by telling Him:

“Jesus, I believe that when You died, You were dying for me. You were paying for every wrong thing I ever did. And right now, with all the faith I've got, I'm putting my total trust in You to be my personal Rescuer from my personal sin. Beginning here and now, I'm Yours.”

At that moment, you trade your sin for His forgiveness, your emptiness for His peace, your hell for His heaven. The search of a lifetime ends at the foot of an old rugged cross. When you get to the cross, you can finally find your way home.

[Holwick: The Paul Harvey quote is actually an urban legend. It was actually written by Keith A. Fournier, founder of the Catholic Way website. See http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_paul_harvey_passion.htm]

__________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft (special) · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crossgood fridaylost

Who Killed Jesus?

Mark 15:6

[Article on Jesus' death by a noted liberal scholar]

“It is vital that the Passion Play be continued at Oberammergau; for never has the menace of Jewry been so convincingly portrayed as in this presentation of what happened in the times of the Romans. There one sees in Pontius Pilate a Roman racially and intellectually so superior, that he stands out like a firm, clean rock in the middle of the whole muck and mire of Jewry.” -- Adolf Hitler (July 5, 1942)

It is sometimes asserted that even if ‘the Jews’ killed Jesus (as described in John’s gospel), that must be a good thing, since it led to the resurrection. But whether any effect is good or bad, responsibility for the crucifixion's cause must be assessed honestly. Further, many post-Vatican II Catholics and liberal Protestants understand “the Jews” as standing in for “all of us.” As we will see below, there is profound truth in that corporate responsibility interpretation, but it can never excuse incarnating such universal accountability in any specific group, and certainly not in “the Jews.”

Passion (from Latin passio or suffering) is the Christian name for the story of Jesus' execution, from Gethsemane to Golgotha and from Mark to John. Mark is the major source for that story used by Matthew and Luke (historical certitude level: A+). Second, those three gospels are the major source used by John (historical certitude level: B-). In other words, it is quite possible that Mark is the only consecutive source for the entire gospel tradition of Jesus' execution. That raises some obvious questions: Why is everyone so dependent on Mark? Why are there no independent accounts apart from Mark? Therefore, how much of Mark is actual history and how much is parable?

THE PROBLEM OF DRAMA. My first faint glimpse of the “problem” of the historical Jesus occurred in 1960 when I saw the Oberammergau passion play in a version unchanged since Hitler saw it in 1930 and 1934 [Holwick: I believe the Oberammergau play only occurs once a decade]. I knew the story, of course, but something happened when I saw it as drama rather than read it as text. At the start of the play, the stage is filled with children, women, and men shouting for Jesus (our Palm Sunday). But by early evening, that stage is filled with that same crowd shouting against Jesus (our Good Friday). No explanation was made for that change, and no reason was evident for why any people were against Jesus. Furthermore, when the story is staged or screened as drama rather than heard or read as text, that Jewish crowd shouting for the Jewish Jesus' crucifixion takes on a central focus in the narrative. They, rather than Caiaphas or Pilate, seem in charge of the proceedings, responsible for the events, guilty of the results. The anti-Jewish, if not anti-Semitic, potentials in that passion story are emphasized even more on stage or screen than in text or gospel.

THE PROBLEM OF HISTORY. There are profound questions still to be asked about the historical accuracy of that basic passion story: about the shouting crowds, the reluctant Pilate, and the innocent Jesus (as victim rather than martyr). Here, I note just one item. In Mark 15:6-15, “the crowd” comes before Pilate to obtain amnesty for Barabbas and only turn against Jesus when Pilate tries to release him instead. But now watch what happens to that Markan source as the story progresses through the later Gospels. Matthew 27:15-26 first copies Mark's “the crowd” but then enlarges it to “the crowds” and finally to “all the people.” Luke 23:13-15 changes Mark to “the chief priests, the leaders, and the people.” Finally, John 18:37-40 speaks simply of “the Jews.” Recall, of course, that those expansions do not represent independent knowledge but dependent development. “The crowd,” in other words, grows exponentially before our eyes. Even if you accept Mark's “crowd” as history (I myself think it parable), it only tells us about that small group who are for Barabbas rather than against Jesus, those who want Barabbas freed and refuse Jesus as his replacement.

THE PROBLEM OF THEOLOGY. Theology is the meaning of history as known by faith. There are three points to be considered in the Christian interpretation of Jesus' execution.

• Sacrificial Death. When people give up their lives for others, either as fire-fighters and police officers or as protesters and martyrs, we term those deaths sacrifices. While all life and death is sacred, such deaths are considered particularly sacred. It is bad theology to imagine that God demands such sacrifices, as if, by divine decree, somebody had to die in that burning building, so if not the trapped child, then the heroic rescuer.

• Vicarious Atonement. It was always possible for martyrs to offer their sacrificial deaths as atonement for the sins of their people. That presumed persecution was sin's divine punishment rather hate's human consequence. During the persecution that led to the Maccabean revolt, the martyr Eleazar asks God to “be merciful to your people, and let our punishment suffice for them. Make my blood their purification, and take my life in exchange for theirs” (4 Maccabees 6:28-29). It is bad theology to presume that persecution is a divine punishment for sin -- but, granted that, the proper answer from God to Eleazar is “I accept your gift of martyrdom but reject your theology of retribution.”

• Divine Retribution. St. Anselm of Canterbury, the medieval theologian, suggested human sinfulness required divine punishment, but since we are inadequate to repay our offenses, only a divine Son of God could substitute for us. In other words, it was not just that humans might offer vicarious atonement but that God demanded it -- and demanded it from Jesus. It is bad if not obscene theology to claim that God demands victims rather than permanently offering forgiveness, a gift as consistently present as the air that surrounds us or the gravity that supports us.

THE PROBLEM OF REALITY. There is, however, one very profound reason for maintaining those two preceding solutions. If, historically, it was “the Jews” who forced Pilate to execute a dissident Jewish theologian rather than crucify a religio-political anti-Roman activist, we Christians do not have to face what actually happened. If, theologically, it was a divine plan where all protagonists, however, are not personally responsible, then we Christians do not have to face what actually happened.

But the reality is that Jesus was officially, legally, and publicly executed by Roman authority -- that is, by at least the normalcy and maybe even the cutting edge of civilization in his time. Pilate knew Jesus was not a violent threat, or he would have rounded up and executed many of his closest followers. But Pilate also knew that Jesus was a religio-political opponent of Roman imperialism who had announced the Kingdom of God for this earth in subversive opposition to the Kingdom of Rome. Theologically, then, if we Christians believe that Jesus was the incarnation of God, we must accept that at least the normalcy of civilization and maybe even its cutting edge (then incarnate in the Roman Empire) legally executed him.

I have read the chapter on “The Crucifixion Examined, and Imagined” in William F. Buckley, Jr.'s Nearer, My God: An Autobiography of Faith, and it emphasizes Jesus' intolerable suffering. I have heard that Mel Gibson's forthcoming movie on the passion of Jesus will do the same. Had Pilate primarily wanted suffering, Jesus could have been abused and tortured for weeks in the barracks of his praetorium. But Pilate wanted official and legal execution, wanted a placarded public warning -- and even though crucifixion involved terrible pain. To emphasize the detail of suffering is to avoid the implications of execution.

We Christians belong to the only world religion whose founder was legally executed. But to avoid facing that, we speak about suffering, as if Jesus had been run over by a chariot and died in accidental agony. It is surely easier to blame “the Jews” or even God or to emphasize suffering than to face the possibility that the Kingdom of God is on a collision course, not just with the Roman Empire on a bad day, but with the normalcy of civilization on a good day.

In the powerful parable of Matthew 27:19, Pilate's wife sent him this message as he sat in judgment on Jesus: “Have nothing to do with that innocent man, for today I have suffered a great deal because of a dream about him.” To continue in parabolic style, I imagine what might have happened when Pilate returned to his private quarters. He told his wife that he had received her advice but had condemned Jesus to death in any case. But, he said, he could not understand.

“Why do these people oppose us? We have brought them law and order. We have brought them peace and prosperity. We have brought them culture and civilization. We have brought them free trade and international commerce. Why do they hate us so?” And his wife said: “Yes dear, it is a puzzlement. But let's have dinner and forget all about it.”

*

The Scandal of the Cross

1 Corinthians 1:23

There is a striking verse in the New Testament in which the Apostle Paul refers to the Cross of Jesus Christ as “a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles” (1 Cor. 1:23). One can readily understand why he would say that. After all, to the Greek mind, sophistication, philosophy, and learning were exalted pursuits. How could one crucified, possibly spell knowledge?

To the Jewish mind, there was a cry and longing to be free. Throughout their history, they had been attacked by numerous powers and often humiliated by occupying forces. Whether it was the Assyrians or the Babylonians or the Romans, Jerusalem had been repeatedly plundered and its people left homeless. What would the Hebrew have wanted more than someone who could take up their cause and repel the enemy? How could a Messiah who was crucified possibly be of any help?

To the Greek, the Cross was foolishness. To the Jew, it was a stumbling block. What was it about the Cross that so roundly defied everything that power relished? Crucifixion was humiliating, so humiliating that the Romans who specialized in the art of torture assured their own citizenry that a Roman could never be crucified. Not only was it humiliating, it was excruciating. In fact the very word “excruciating” comes from two Latin words, “ex cruciatus,” or “out of the Cross.” Crucifixion was the defining word for pain.

Does that not give us pause? Think of it: humiliation and agony. That was the path Jesus chose to reach out for you and for me. You see, this thing we call sin but which we so tragically minimize breaks the grandeur for which we were created. It brings indignity to our essence and pain to our existence. It separates us from God.

On Good Friday two thousand years ago, Jesus took the ultimate indignity and the ultimate pain to bring us back to the dignity of a relationship with God and the healing of our souls. When we receive Him we find that it is sin that is foolishness, and our greatest weakness is not an enemy from without but one from within. It is our own weak wills that cause us to stumble. Jesus Christ frees us from the foolishness of sin and the weakness of our selves.

And this is the very reason the Apostle Paul went on to say that he preached Jesus Christ crucified, which was the power of God and the wisdom of God. Will you remember that this was done for you and receive his gift? Come to the Cross and find his power and his wisdom.

________

Copyright © 2004 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

The Passion In Music: Two Versions of the Passion

For nearly two millennia, the Gospels' passion narratives have inspired memorable works of art, the most recent example being Mel Gibson's film THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST.

Gibson acknowledged this artistic tradition when he said that he wanted his film to be a “Caravaggio in motion.” His reference was to the sixteenth-century painter whose use of contrasting light and dark gave his depiction of biblical scenes a sense of urgency and intensity.

It's almost impossible to imagine the history of Western painting without the art inspired by the Passion. Da Vinci, Tintoretto, Giotto, and El Greco are but a few of the great artists whose definitive works depict the events of Holy Thursday and Good Friday.

What's true of painting is certainly also true of music. Johann Sebastian Bach set the passion narratives in Mark, Matthew, and John to music. Unfortunately only the latter two survive. Of these, it is his ST. MATTHEW'S PASSION that sits atop the Western musical canon.

First performed on Good Friday of 1729, the work is almost sacred opera. Soloists sing the words of Jesus, Judas, and Pilate, while another soloist, called the “Evangelist,” narrates the story. These interactions are punctuated by choral settings of well known hymns.

Two-and-a-half centuries later, another Christian composer, Arvo Part, set JOHN'S PASSION to music. The influential music magazine GRAMOPHONE called the result, PASSIO, a work “that transcends the doubt and nihilism of [our] age ... “

While Bach and Part are telling the same story and share the same faith, the results are very different. One reviewer has characterized PASSIO as a music of “massive stillness.” Whereas “Bach celebrated the human voice for its expressiveness, Part turns it into an instrument.”

Bach's expressiveness and Part's stillness combine to help the listener more fully appreciate what happened on that first Good Friday. That's why Christians owe it to themselves to become better acquainted with their work and the other art inspired by the Passion — art that can help us transcend the doubt and nihilism of OUR age.

FOR FURTHER READING AND INFORMATION:

• Bernard D. Sherman, “Performing Bach's St. Matthew Passion,” reprinted from Early Music America, Fall 2001.

• Geoff Chapman, “Passion and power from pen of J. S. Bach,” Toronto Star, 5 April 2004.

• See BreakPoint's viewer's guide for The Passion of the Christ for talking points about the film.

• BreakPoint Commentary No. 040227, “Art that Transcends: The Passion of the Christ.”

• M. Moore, “The Word More Sure,” BreakPoint Online, 9 March 2004.

• M. Moore, “Seeing with the Eyes of Music,” BreakPoint Online, 9 August 2002.

• Roberto Rivera y Carlo, “Springtime and Signs: Lent and Holy Week,” Boundless, 10 April 2003.

• Ned Bustard, ed., It Was Good: Making Art to the Glory of God (Square Halo Books, 2000).

__________

Copyright (c) 2004 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database good friday

The Day Jesus Died

Mark 15:42

[An alternate view on the timing of events of Holy Week]

While Church tradition commemorates the crucifixion of Jesus on Good Friday, there are many debates over which day of the week Jesus died. Did Jesus really die on Friday - or did he die on Wednesday evening, or Thursday?

The Friday view is based on the wording of Mark 15:42, which says that Christ's crucifixion occurred on the day of preparation, “the day before the Sabbath”. Since the Hebrew Sabbath is on Saturday, the Church traditionally held that Jesus was crucified on Friday. However, Jesus prophesied that he would be dead for three days and three nights before his resurrection: “For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” (Matthew 12:40). There are obviously not three days and three nights between Friday evening and Sunday morning.

The problem appears easily resolved by a clarification of what Mark meant by “sabbath”. Along with the weekly Sabbath day, the Jews had other “sabbaths” throughout the year, marking high holy days. In Matthew 28:1, the Greek should be translated, “at the end of the sabbaths” - a plural word - noting that there had been more than one sabbath the previous week. The first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread was also considered a “sabbath” (Lev. 23:6,7). This Feast is celebrated on Nisan 15, the day after the Passover (Lev. 23:5-6). Jesus was crucified on the Passover and Mark 15:42-43 notes that Joseph of Arimathea desired to take Christ's body down from the cross before the high sabbath began.

[Luke 22:1 and Matthew 26:17 create confusion. Denotatively, the two Feasts are separate days. Connotatively, the entire period from Passover through the 7 days of the Feast of Unleavened Bread is considered “Passover”.]

If Passover, the 14th of Nisan, fell earlier in the week, the 15th could have been any day prior to Saturday, the weekly Sabbath. “When the sabbaths were past” would, of course, be Sunday (actually, Saturday after sundown), in accordance to the Feast of Firstfruits. (Some hold to a Thursday crucifixion on a similar basis.)

John 12:1 mentions that Jesus traveled to Bethany six days before the Passover. Hebrew days are reckoned from sundown to sundown, so that each “day” begins at sundown the evening before. These six evening-to-morning periods are important to our understanding of the fulfillment of Old Testament Feasts, particularly the Feasts of Passover, Unleavened Bread and Firstfruits. We will track these days and see how they match the pattern set down for us in the book of Leviticus.

DAY ONE - FRIDAY - The 9TH of Nisan

We know from Luke 19:1 and Mark 10:46 that Jesus was in Jericho prior to traveling to Bethany. Jesus would have had to be in Bethany before sundown on Friday, since at sundown the Sabbath would start, and long-distance travel was not permitted on the Sabbath.

DAY TWO - SATURDAY (sundown Friday to sundown Saturday) - The 10th of Nisan

“On the next day much people that were come to the feast, when they heard that Jesus was coming to Jerusalem, took branches of palm trees, and went forth to meet him, and cried, Hosanna: Blessed is the King of Israel that cometh in the name of the Lord.” - John 12:12-13

This is Jesus' Triumphal Entry into Jerusalem, commemorated on Palm Sunday (in accordance with the Friday view, which put it 5 days before the crucifixion). However, it appears it occurred on a Saturday. Jesus went into the Temple and threw out the moneychangers shortly after this. He then taught daily in the Temple until the Passover (Luke 19:45-48, Mark 11:15-17).

His entry into Jerusalem on the 10th day of Nisan also corresponds with Exodus 12:3-6, in which a lamb was separated from the flock and put on display as the lamb destined to be sacrificed on Passover. On this day, Jesus was put on display as he proceeded from Bethany down the Mount of Olives toward Jerusalem. While the People welcomed Jesus as the Messiah, the King, his primary purpose at that time was to die, as he explains in John 12:23-33.

DAY THREE - SUNDAY (sundown Saturday to sundown Sunday) - The 11th of Nisan

During this time, the “Lamb of God” was on public display in and around Jerusalem, teaching the people many things. Some of Jesus' most well-known parables and prophecies were made during these next several days.

DAY FOUR - MONDAY (sundown Sunday to sundown Monday) - The 12th of Nisan

A quiet day at Bethany - Matthew 26:2-6 (spent in the house of Simon the Leper).

DAY FIVE - TUESDAY (sundown Monday to sundown Tuesday) - The 13th of Nisan

DAY SIX - WEDNESDAY (sundown Tuesday to sundown Wednesday) - The 14th of Nisan

- The Last Supper took place at the Passover meal (Luke 22:15-20, John 13-17). Jesus offered his disciples the broken bread and the wine as representing his own body and blood. He washed their feet and taught them many last things before his death.

- He was arrested in the Garden after Judas' betrayal.

- After several trials, he was beaten and finally crucified on Wednesday afternoon.

- The preparations for burial were made before sundown (Mark 15:42-43).

THE THREE DAYS IN THE TOMB

DAY ONE - THURSDAY (sundown Wednesday to sundown Thursday) - 15th of Nisan

Leviticus 23:5 designates the 14th of Nisan to be the day for observing Passover. Jesus was placed in the tomb just prior to sundown on Wednesday and spent his first full night and day in the tomb beginning on the 15th of Nisan, the Feast of Unleavened Bread. Unleavened bread was pure bread. Jesus was pure and undefiled and without sin. During the Jewish observance of this feast, some of the unleavened bread was to be hidden away by the father for a time, only to be brought out and eaten later.

DAY TWO - FRIDAY (sundown Thursday to sundown Friday) - 16th of Nisan

DAY THREE - SATURDAY (sundown Friday to sundown Saturday) - 17th of Nisan

Jesus' body lay in the grave for the third night after his crucifixion. Sometime after sundown Saturday evening (the start of Sunday), Jesus rose from the dead. Thus, he had been in the grave three days and three nights as prophesied. [Some argue from Luke 24:20-21 that Jesus must have been crucified on Thursday, which would have had him in the grave Thursday night and Friday, Friday night and Saturday, Saturday night and Sunday morning.]

On Sunday morning, when the women went to the tomb with burial spices, they found the tomb empty. Sunday, as the “morrow after the Sabbath” after Passover was the Feast of Firstfruits (Lev 23:10-11; 1 Cor 15:20-23). In rising from the dead, Jesus became the firstfruits of all those who die and yet will be resurrected to live forever.

*

from email submitted by Rick Swenson, Hopatcong, New Jersey · Chuck Missler via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

The Great Reversal, Part 1

Although it has not happened since 1913, and won't happen again till 2008, Easter can come as early as March 23, just barely inside the official limits of spring. But whether Holy Week falls in March or April makes little difference in Texas. It's always springtime here by then.

People like the dogwood to be in full bloom for Good Friday. They like to point out to one another how the dogwood's white blossom, shaped like an ivory Maltese cross, each point dented and tinged with red, is an emblem of Christ's crucifixion wounds. They even send one another greeting cards bearing the so-called Legend of the Dogwood, which links the tree with the wood used for the cross.

The dogwood trees are usually blooming at about the same time I teach college sophomores the Housman poem that begins,

Loveliest of trees, the cherry now

Is hung with bloom along the bough,

And stands about the woodland ride

Wearing white for Eastertide.

Most of my students have never seen cherry trees in bloom. The Texas weather is too mild and genial for the cherry's hearty nature, so I rely on the dogwood tree to furnish them with a reasonable facsimile of Housman's vision. The decorative dogwood chooses to display its white blossoms along the highways precisely when they will be the most conspicuous-before their own leaves unfurl and before the other, taller trees have put on their new leaves. Thus, the shadowy recesses of the winter-bare forests provide the perfect background for the white blossoms.

The only rival to the dogwood's ostentation during Holy Week is the redbud, also known as “the Judas tree.” Most flowering trees bloom only from the tips of their twigs, but the redbud's small, purplish pink blossoms pop out all over its smooth, silvery skin, even directly from the branches and the trunk. A popular horticulturist calls the redbud “the colorful doll of our hardwood forests” and compares its flowers to “little dancing shoes.”

People in this part of Texas consider a perfect Holy Week one in which the dogwood's dramatic appearance exactly overlaps the redbud's rouging of the Texas roadsides with its smudges of pink. And as if the native flowering trees weren't enough, bluebonnets smear across acres of pastureland like mosaics of lapis lazuli, punctuated by saffron Indian paintbrush.

They are very beautiful, these blossom-laden trees and fields of blowing flowers, heartbreakingly beautiful. And I have plenty of opportunity to have my heart broken as I drive twice a week to the university, 60 miles away. The little two-lane highway dips and twists over creeks and around farms that used to grow cotton but now are grazed by crossbred cattle.

Some of the descendants of the people who used to pick the cotton still live along this road or in the tiny towns of Shiro and Roan's Prairie. Their decrepit houses lean and gape at the surrounding woods and fields. They stay, the people who live in these hungry houses, because they are tied to the dogwood and redbud, just as surely as they were once tied to the cotton. Every spring they wait for the dogwood's appearing, and its glory, sudden and stunning, gets them through another year. So they stay on in their obliquely slanting houses, sustained by social security or ADC checks, rather than move to the city.

I suppose I'm one of the few people who actually like Lent. I like it in the same way I like throwing away last year's student essays and clearing out my file cabinets. During Lent some deep crack opens in my soul, down which I like to shovel the dirt and debris that has accumulated over the year. The sly self-deceptions, the dogged willfulness, the witless pain I've left in my wake that I've been too busy to notice or repair. From back in February, before the blooming starts, 40 days always looks like little enough time for this task. The penitential season is for clearing away accumulated garbage, and I usually set to work with a will.

But three years ago, late in March, I was driving to work in College Station on Good Friday through a miasma of dogwood and redbud and not feeling good about it at all. It was a sparkling, resplendent day. Thickets of wild plum threw up their dark arms in dreamy clouds of white. Primroses, tenderly pink and gold, filled up the ditches along the road.

I was not pleased. This was not a penitential landscape. Good Friday is not the time for beauty.

Yet here I was on my way to teach a bunch of 19-year-olds-most of whose minds were undefended by dogma, half of whom probably had no idea what Good Friday was all about-a poem that told them they should have their socks knocked off by the ersatz cherry trees blooming all about them. They were probably a good deal more concerned at present with their own hormones than the beauties of the woodland ride. But was converting them from hedonists to aesthetes any improvement?

I drove along, vaguely offended by the fields of flowers in full cry and the hillsides spangled with Easter white. This is the week, I thought, the Savior of the world dies. This is the day when all that is good and true goes down to suffer death at the hands of the arrogant, those swollen with the pride of power. And what is the world doing? What is the earth, its own life threatened by those same enemies, doing? Did it care? Was it grieving? No. It was shouldering aside the clods and the husks of its dead self in order to break into life. This unseemly riot had been going on for at least five days, in fact, ever since Palm Sunday-a term that sounded almost pagan itself. Another tree, another symbol of life had been flaunted in the face of suffering and death on that day, too.

As I watched the land roll by, it was as though this week, this so-called holy week, and this day, this tragically good Friday, were being mocked by the triumph of a fickle and unregarding life-life heedlessly, ruthlessly springing forth with relish, ignoring the torn placenta, the shriveling umbilical cord. Life ignoring the violated flesh and choked-off breath to which it owed its very existence, winking at the blood and muck from which it rose. Disregarding the cost.

I started up the range of hills that form the watershed of the Navasota River, glad to leave the flagrant fields behind me for a while. Dark pines rise up beside the highway there, shading out the understory trees and making vertical walls through which the road cuts toward Carlos, a community of itinerant coal miners who work in shifts for the regional power plant.

This was what Good Friday should be like, I thought. Somber and stripped. And here among the austere pines I could concentrate on what this day was about, could consider my own part in this necessary Good Friday.

All week I had been reading the penitential psalms and examining my sins. The exercise had been a satisfying one since my sins were clear and undeniable, and what was required of me to be rid of them was just as clear.

But now it was Good Friday. What did you do after you'd confessed all your sins and cleaned out all your closets? I took one last look around the bare cell of my heart for some forgotten fault, at the same time being careful to avoid the danger of manufacturing contrition for its own sake. Scruples, the small, sharp stones that score an overactive conscience, can also lead to the sin of self-indulgence, I knew.

But what else was there to do on Good Friday? Already, on this spring morning, as I was descending the hills toward the river, Jesus was beginning his climb to Golgotha. What else was there to do? For the women who followed him, “looking on afar off,” for those standing beneath the cross, what was there left to do?

Nothing. Quite obviously just nothing. The soldier who confessed, “Truly this man was the Son of God,” and the one who pierced his Savior's side with the spear, both were equally helpless there, I suddenly saw. Because Good Friday is the day when you can do nothing. Bewailing and lamenting your manifold sins does not in itself make up for them. Scouring your soul in a frenzy of spring cleaning only sterilizes it; it does not give it life. On Good Friday, finally, we are all, mourners and mockers alike, reduced to the same impotence. Someone else is doing the terrible work that gives life to the world. Good Friday is the day we can do nothing at all.

No matter that I repudiated my old transgressions. On Good Friday, all one's fine feelings count for nothing. If there was to be anything new about life after today, it had to come from some source beyond myself. That is why there was nothing more to do on Good Friday . Our hope is built on nothing less than Jesus' blood and righteousness. His blood and his righteousness.

I passed the intersection at Carlos with its one blinking, yellow light and crossed the bridge over the pipeline that carries the coal slurry to the plant a few miles further on. From there the road bent northward to cross the river.

As I broke out of the pines and into the fertile bottomland, the spring again assaulted me. The land below, emerging from the tendrils of morning fog, was a tangle of luxuriant fertility. Clouds of pink and white, effulgent enough to inebriate the soberest soul, lured one's line of vision into the darker trees. Acres of bluebonnets streaked up the red clay banks of the river. The earth, on this Good Friday, cast forth its life, heedless of the sacrifice that sustained it. Its callous, regardless life, sucked from the source it can never repay, never replenish. Continually drawing on the death of its Savior to live. Just like me.

*

from Christianitytoday.com · Virginia Stem Owens via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

You Hurt My Jesus! Hurt My Jesus!"

When Bonnie's daughter was four, they attended an Easter pageant about the death and Resurrection of Christ. The play was beautiful with magnificent costumes and scenery.

Bonnie made sure Robyn had an aisle seat so that she wouldn't miss a thing. Jesus came staggering down the aisle carrying the Cross. Big Roman soldiers pushed and shoved him.

Robyn watched with wide eyes. At the reception following the performance, one of the actors who played a Roman soldier came over to Robyn, kneeled down and quietly asked her, “Did you enjoy the play?”

Robyn wagged her finger at him and said, “You BAD man! Bad! Bad man! You hurt my Jesus!”

from Source not recorded · P Bohanan via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixionchildren

It's Friday, But Sunday's Coming!

Friday is the day on which for thirty pieces of silver Judas sold his master; but Sunday is coming.

Friday is the day on which Peter denied Christ three times, swore he never knew Him; but Sunday is coming.

Friday is the day soldiers made a crown of thorns for Jesus, mocked him, spit on Him and humiliated Him; but Sunday is coming.

Friday is the day the mob preferred armed robber Barabbas to the Son of God Jesus; but Sunday is coming.

Friday is the day the Roman Governor tried to wash away his guilt in travesty of Justice; but Sunday is coming.

Friday is the day Jesus prayed in agony, “My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me”; but Sunday is coming.

Friday is the day that same voice cried out, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” but Sunday is coming.

It's Friday. Christ is dead. The disciples are scattered. The devil is triumphant. Darkness is everywhere. But Sunday is coming!

Sunday has come! And we celebrate life and not death; we celebrate the victory of good over evil.

Sunday is glorious. The condemned is now the Lord of lords. God, who seemed to abandon Jesus on Friday, raised Him up by His power. He gave Him a name above every other name, that at the name of Jesus, every knee must bow.

In your Fridays, remember God has not forgotten you. He would not turn His back on you in the dark nights of your soul. Do not fear. As it was with Jesus, so is it true for you.

Sunday is coming!

from Source not recorded · Tony Campolo via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database good fridayvictory

Good Friday -- A Day To Listen

As I sat in church, the choir stood to sing the old hymn, "Were You There When They Crucified My Lord?" As the words filled the church, I found myself wondering about those who witnessed the crucifixion events. Who were they? What did they see?

I lifted my eyes to the cross above the altar..the wooden beams where God's own Son gave Himself to us in a great and saving act. How long had it been since I'd pondered the events of the cross? The old hymn continued to ask the question. No, I wasn't there when they crucified my Lord, I thought. But perhaps I could rediscover those pivotal events through the eyes of those who were.

So this week I hope you will join me as we re-enter that first Holy Week and listen firsthand to those who were present around the cross: a pilgrim who had come for Passover, a beloved disciple, a roman centurion, the Judean prosurator, a wealthy member of the Sanhedrin, a woman healed by Jesus, a common thief, and Jesus'own mother. Each of them has something to say to us about the crucifixion, about what it can mean in our own lives. Let's gather together around the cross, and listen for their voices.

Lord, open my eyes to see the cross afresh. May it usher us into the breathtaking beauty of Easter...In Jesus name I pray.

from Weekend Guideposts via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

A Tender Reminder [2 versions]

Luke 2:25

There is something comforting about the many lives in Scripture of which we know very little. There was more to the story of the woman who knew that if she could just touch the fringe of Jesus' robe she would get well. There was more to tell about the woman who anointed Jesus with a jar of perfume, or the thief who hung beside Jesus on the cross. Yet we are told only that they will be remembered. And they are. However insignificant their lives were to society, they have been captured in the pages of history as people worth remembering, people who had a role in the story of God on earth — people remembered by God when multitudes wished them forgotten. It is to me a tender reminder that our fleeting lives are yet infinitely significant because we are remembered by the One who hears our prayers and sees our very hearts long before others notice, long after they have stopped listening. It is a reminder, both wonderful and startling, that we live out our lives as a part of God's story.

We know very little about the man named Simeon but that he was in the temple when he realized that God had remembered him. Reaching for the baby in the arms of a young girl, Simeon was moved in praise. It is fitting that his words were sung as Simeon's wrinkled hands cradled the infant.

Sovereign Lord, as you have promised,

you now dismiss your servant in peace.

For my eyes have seen your salvation... (Luke 2:29-30)

Purposefully and powerfully, Simeon uses the language of a slave that has been freed. There is a sense of immediacy and relief, as if a great iron door has been unlocked and he is now free to go through. God had remembered his promise even as He remembered the aging Simeon. He would not die before he saw the Lord's salvation, the Lord had promised. Seeing and holding the child named Jesus, Simeon knew that he was now dismissed to death in peace.

Mary and Joseph stood in awe, marveling at the bold reaction of a stranger. Upon laying eyes on their child, a man unknown to them pronounces that he can now die in peace! Mary and Joseph were well aware of God's hand upon Jesus, yet here they seem to discover that the arm of God, which is not too short to save, extends far beyond anything they imagined. They are again aware of their fleeting position in the unfolding story of God.

Simeon's blessing and words to Mary only further this certainty: “This child is destined to cause the falling and rising of many in Israel, and to be a sign that will be spoken against, so that the thoughts of many hearts will be revealed. And a sword will pierce your own soul too” (Luke 2:34-35). At these words, too, with their baby tenderly embraced, Mary and Joseph marveled.

On this Good Friday we recall the symbol of the Cross, the sword that pierced a mother's heart, and the passion of the one who continues to be spoken against. An old man in the temple hundreds of years ago, through a fraction of a scene in his life, brilliantly reminds us that to look at Jesus is to look at the salvation of God. The human heart is ever revealed in our response to him. It is a mysterious irony that runs through the Christian message; though our sins put him on the cross, it is our response to Christ that God has chosen to remember. In the unforgettable words of Isaac Watts:

Thus, while His death my sin displays

In all its blackest hue,

Such is the mystery of grace,

It seals my pardon too.

With pleasing grief, and mournful joy,

My spirit now if fill'd,

That I should such a life destroy,

Yet live by Him I kill'd!

Perhaps the small excerpts of the many lives we find in Scripture were meant to capture the most significant moment of a fleeting life — their response to Jesus Christ. As the thief peered into the bruised eyes of Jesus, he saw, like Simeon, the salvation of God. May his words echo our response to the one on the Cross: “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom” (Luke 23:42).

__________

Copyright © 2004 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

======================

Version from 12/18/06:

There is something comforting about the many lives in Scripture of which we know very little. There was more to the story of the woman who knew that if she could just touch the fringe of Jesus’s robe she would get well. There was more to tell about the woman who anointed Jesus with a jar of perfume, or the thief who hung beside Jesus on the cross. Yet, we are told only that they will be remembered. And they are. However insignificant their lives were to society, they have been captured in the pages of history as people worth remembering, people who had a role in the story of God on earth -- people remembered by God when multitudes wished them forgotten. It is to me a tender reminder that our fleeting lives are yet infinitely significant because we are remembered by the one who sees our hearts and hears our prayers long before others notice and long after they have stopped listening.

We know very little about the man named Simeon, but we know he was in the temple when he realized that God had remembered him. Reaching for the baby in the arms of a young girl, Simeon was moved to praise. As his wrinkled hands cradled the infant, Simeon sang to God:

“Sovereign Lord, as you have promised,

you now dismiss your servant in peace.

For my eyes have seen your salvation” (Luke 2:29-30).

Simeon uses the language of a slave that has been freed. There is a sense of immediacy and relief, as if a great iron door has been unlocked and he is now free to go through it. God had remembered his promise even as He remembered the aging Simeon. The Lord had promised he would not die before he saw the Lord’s salvation. Now seeing and holding the child named Jesus, Simeon knew he was dismissed to death in peace.

Marveling at the bold reaction of a stranger, Mary and Joseph stood in awe. Upon laying eyes on their child, a man unknown to them pronounced he could now die in peace! They were well aware of God’s hand upon Jesus; yet here they seem to discover that the arm of God, which is not too short to save, extends far beyond anything they imagined.

Simeon’s blessing and words to Mary only furthered this certainty: “This child is destined to cause the falling and rising of many in Israel, and to be a sign that will be spoken against, so that the thoughts of many hearts will be revealed. And a sword will pierce your own soul too” (Luke 2:34-35). To these words as well, Mary and Joseph stood in awe.

In this season of Advent we recall the strange events of God’s coming to earth -- the birth of a baby, the short life of God’s Son, the defying impact of a carpenter. An old man in the temple hundreds of years ago, through a fraction of a scene in his life, reminds us still today that to look at Jesus is to look at the salvation of God. Whether peering at the child in the manger or the man on the Cross, the human heart is yet revealed in its response to him. This is, in fact, our most memorable feature. Though our sins put him on the Cross, it is our response to Christ that God has chosen to remember.

Perhaps the small excerpts of the many fleeting lives we find in Scripture were meant to capture exactly this sentiment. As the thief peered into the bruised eyes of Jesus, like Simeon, he saw the salvation of God. May our response to the one born in our midst echo this man’s words to the one on the Cross: “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom” (Luke 23:42). And so it was.

________

Copyright © 2006 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

A Thought-provoking Easter

Mark 15:34

The images of “The Passion of The Christ” are forever burned in my mind.

It's been months since I saw a pre-release screening of the film and I still find myself thinking about it as I read the Bible. The Gospels came to life in the movie, giving viewers a chance to walk the streets, witness Jesus' beating and follow Him to the cross. Although the scene was short, I felt a great deal of relief as Jesus walked from the tomb. Because of Him, I, too, walked from death's tomb.

I've been a bit more introspective this year as Easter approaches. Here are eight thoughts I've had as I reflect on Scripture and The Passion.

1. There had to be a sacrifice for our sins. Throughout the Old Testament, God required a blood atonement on behalf of the people. When Christ took the cross and shed His blood, He made the final sacrifice for sin. Seeing a holy Jesus take the cross in my place reminded me in graphic detail that I could not have endured His suffering to save my own life. He willingly did for me what I could not do for myself.

2. Satan was -- and is -– ever-present. In the movie, he drifted through the crowds and stood over Jesus in the garden as He prayed. Many times throughout the Old Testament, Satan sought to prevent Christ's birth. Once Jesus was born, Satan did everything to keep Him from the cross. He shadows our lives and attempts to steal from us the freedom Jesus won. It was a poignant portrayal of Satan's banishment near the movie's end. He lost forever. There is victory in Jesus!

3. Jesus was intensely focused on the Father's purpose. Jesus agonized about taking the cross and pleaded with the Father to “take the cup” from Him. But Jesus stood after His final prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane determined to endure what followed. The movie's powerful imagery of Him standing and definitively crushing the head of the snake sealed the prophecy of Genesis 3:15.

4. Jesus' power leaves a wake of redemption in His path. Even as Jesus lifted His beaten and bloodied body from the dusty road on the way to Golgotha, He never stopped being God the Son. He willingly restrained His godly power as a human but the power of God was ever-present. The facial expression of the guard whose ear He replaced, Simon who help carry the cross, the guard who pierced His side -- all of them experienced life changes and easily could have said with the centurion, “This man really was righteous” (Luke 23:47 HCSB).

5. Jesus became the prodigal son. Jesus cried, “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?” (Mark 15:34 HCSB). The Son and the Father were at that moment separated for the first and only time in eternity. Jesus became sin for us and God couldn't look on Him. A grieved Father dropped a tear from heaven at that moment in the movie. But don't you know that the Father was the first to welcome Jesus “home,” making Him the “Heir of all things” (Hebrews 1:2 HCSB).

6. Jesus came to restore, not to condemn. Peter has taken a beating by pulpiteers over the years for denying Christ in His hour of need. But a mob was in the making as Jesus was hauled before the Sanhedrin in the late hours for an illegal trial. If Peter had identified with Christ, he might have been beaten to death or crucified himself. It was Jesus' time to die, not Peter's. Jesus had another purpose for Peter's life at a later date. When we deny Christ, we are simply a prayer from restoration and the next breath from usefulness in God's Kingdom.

7. I should expect to receive lashings when I identify with the cross. It occurred to me as I watched the movie that Simon the Cyrenian probably took several inadvertent back lashings intended for Jesus as he helped Jesus carry the cross. Jesus said, “If they persecuted me, they will persecute you” (John 15:20 HCSB). A question we should ask as Christians is, “Are we so identified with Christ that we receive the lashings meant for Him?”

8. The world still hates Jesus. Secularists and liberal theologians have attacked the movie as sensational, anti-Semitic, historically inaccurate and culturally divisive. The larger issue is not the movie; it is the personal spiritual confrontation of the ages: “What am I going to do with Christ?” It is nearly impossible to see the movie and not wrestle with the question.

One's answer -- whether Christian or not -- should be seriously measured. Egocentrism squeezes Jesus out and exiles Him to a place of unimportance. Secularists and liberal theologians want to set their own terms for dealing with Jesus. But it is spiritual suicide to deny that Jesus was conceived of the Holy Spirit, born of a virgin, lived a sinless life, died, was raised to life and ascended into heaven where He sits at God's right hand. “All things were created through Him, and apart from Him not one thing was created that has been created” (John 1:3 HCSB).

Because of His preeminence, He made the exclusive claim as the way to eternal salvation (John 3:16-17;14:6). It is this truthful exclusivity the world hated 2,000 years ago and still hates today.

Spend some time this Easter reflecting on your relationship with Jesus. If you've seen the movie, re-read the biblical story and, whether a believer or not, ask yourself, “What am I going to do with Jesus?”

*

7 Distinct Lessons of the Cross of Christ

Mark 15:15

In order to behold the many facets of truth that shine outward from Calvary, Christians must behold the cross from various perspectives, Ray Pritchard writes. There are seven distinct points of view: what it meant to God, Christ, Satan, the world, the church, the struggle against sin and in heaven.

-- What the cross meant to God: a turning away of His wrath, a demonstration of His justice, an outpouring of His grace.

-- What the cross meant to Jesus: He became sin for all humans.

-- What the cross meant to Satan: he was disarmed, disgraced and defeated.

-- What the cross means to the world: a symbol of shame and a symbol of salvation.

-- What the cross means to the church: the cross Christians carry, boast in and preach.

-- What the cross means to sin: unity in Christ and crucifixion of the old self.

-- What the cross means in heaven: it is a real place where Christ's victory is celebrated without end, the vision of which gives Christians hope to face the difficulties of life.

“It is the cross that saves us, that changes us, the cross that gives us hope. And one day when we see Jesus, we will bow before him, seeing in his hands and feet the very marks of his death that gave us life. That day is not yet. Until then, we linger at the foot of the cross where we behold the wonder and mystery of the Lamb who died for us,” Pritchard concludes.

*

The Seven Last Words

John 19:26

“Since Jesus knew he was dying, his last words convey a special meaning to us,” Ray Pritchard writes. Beginning with Jesus' first words on the cross, “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do,” Pritchard offers a poignant reminder of why Christians are called to forgive even those who have done the unforgivable. He continues with the last-second salvation of the thief on the cross, a man he describes as one who missed all the outward signs of Jesus' kingship, yet believed.

With the words, “I tell you the truth. Today, you will be with me in paradise,” Jesus promised the thief the same immediate, personal and heavenly salvation He offers believers today. Jesus' next words, recorded in John 19:26-27, are nothing short of the final words of a family man, Prichard writes. His concern and care for His earthly mother are a lesson on a Christian's obligation to care for and honor his or her parents as well.

The forsaken Christ then utters the words, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" (Matthew 27:45-46). Describing the historical event with eternal implications, Pritchard discusses the idea of God turning away from the sin of the world that was borne by Jesus. When God did that, Jesus was alone, Pritchard explains, adding that Christians must never minimize the horror of human sin or the cost of their salvation.

“I thirst,” the only statement that deals with Jesus' physical suffering, offers a reminder that suffering does not necessarily mean a person is out of God's will.

The work of salvation was complete when Jesus uttered, “It is finished.” A person's only option is to accept or reject salvation, Pritchard writes.

Jesus' final words, “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit,” signify the restoration of the relationship between Christ and God. In Matthew 27 Jesus uses the phrase, “My God,” and the plan of salvation is fulfilled. His spirit is returning home. It is nothing short of a model of how His followers should approach death and reunion with the Father.

Between Life and Death: Lives In the Balance

On Good Friday Jesus died as a substitutionary atonement for the sins of mankind. This is what Christians commemorate. In dying, Jesus established, as a defining mark of a Christian society, the principle of human dignity and the sacredness of life. Fallen sinners?all made in the image of God?are so precious in God's sight that He would sacrifice His only begotten Son for them.

What an irony this presents this year. Jesus died so that we could be free and saved. It was a noble death, if there ever was one. But another death occupies the headlines today, one that mocks the death of Jesus. It is Terri Schiavo who is being killed by judicial fiat. For what reason?

She is being killed so that society can get rid of a nuisance. She is being killed so her husband can be free to marry the woman he has lived with for years and who has borne his children. Her husband, allegedly, profited from the damages paid because of the medical injury to Terri. She is being killed so that medical funds can be saved.

Good Friday marks a day on which God established the principle of the sanctity of life once and for all. One man died so that all men could be free. The Terri Schiavo case marks the triumph of utilitarianism over that Christian view of life. It is victory for the likes of Peter Singer, the ethicist at Princeton, who favors infanticide and euthanasia and who argues that the governing ethical principle in life has to create the greatest happiness for the greatest number.

But no life is safe in a utilitarian society. I am seventy-three. One of these days a committee of doctors could say that I am too inconvenient or cost too much to keep alive. “It is time,” as former Governor Lamb once provocatively said in Colorado, “to do my duty and die and get out of the way of the younger generation, like leaves swept up off the streets.”

The retired folks in Florida and elsewhere, many of whom are privately thinking they really would like to keep this principle of assisted suicide intact because they may want to avoid suffering, are turning the decision of whether they live or die over to others. Do they really want to do that?

We used to say in law school, “Bad cases make bad law.” This is a very bad case. Medical data concerning Terri is old and ambiguous. There is conflicting testimony about whether she really is in a persistent vegetative state. She certainly does not look and act like she is in one. She was not being maintained on life support. She was simply being fed and receiving water as any other human being would expect. So if we can kill Terri, who is next?

Thundering out of the heavens this Good Friday come God’s words: “I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses, now choose life so that you and your children may live and that you may love the Lord your God.”

I shudder to think what is going on in the heavenly councils at this moment, as on this day of all days, black-robed judges in courts are ordering that an innocent woman starve to death. Choose life? Can anyone hear those words today?

________

Copyright (c) 2005 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database good friday

A Lamb Slain

John 1:29

Ralph Wood, professor of theology and literature at Baylor University, once asked a group of seminary students to compare two scenes: an astute collegian who tells you insistently that sin and the fall of man are fallacies invented by the superstitious, and a young pagan in a remote village whom you find in the woods sacrificing a chicken on a makeshift altar. “Which man is farther from the truth?” he asked. The students hemmed and hawed but hesitantly agreed that the pagan boy, however primitively, understood something the other did not. There is a need in our lives for atonement. There is a need for blood.

The depravity of man is at once the most unpopular of the Christian doctrines and the most empirically verifiable. We have within us a basic sense of our desperate condition. We are aware, or often reminded, that we not quite what we were intended to be. Something went wrong, something we yearn to see made right, but somehow find ourselves incapable of restoring.

For generations, the Israelites labored to follow laws that were meant to atone for their sin and restore them to the presence of God. “And you shall provide a lamb a year old without blemish for a burnt offering to the LORD daily; morning by morning you shall provide it” (Ezekiel 46:13). The language of sacrifice and offering was found throughout Near Eastern culture. But the blood of Israel's sacrifices was not like the blood shed by those attempting to appease and approach the gods they feared and followed. The prophets sent throughout Israel's history were forever insisting that God wanted more than the empty performance of sacrifice. He desired the offerings to exemplify the heart of a worshiper, one yearning to be in the presence of Him who created us, drawing nearer through the blood of a spotless lamb.

When Scriptures speak of Christ as the Lamb of God, it is easy to think of it as something like symbolic code. Each time we read of the lamb or the lion in Scripture, it is easy to move through the text with an instantaneous recognition: The lamb is Christ. The lion is Christ. But Oxford scholar John Lennox reminds us that these passages tell us not only who it is, but what it is. It's Christ as the lamb, the spotless lamb whose blood my life requires. The description moves well beyond symbolism. He is the Lamb whose blood atones my depravity, the Lamb who moves me forever into the presence of God.

When John describes his vision of heaven in the book of Revelation, the Lamb is found in the center of a singing multitude. “Then I saw a Lamb, looking as if it had been slain, standing in the center of the throne, encircled by the four living creatures and the elders” (Rev. 5:6). Asks Lennox, “But how can a slain lamb stand?” On this Good Friday, it is an image that poses much for our hearts and minds. The Lamb who bore my sins, forever bears the scars of my atonement, even as he stands.

As the Lamb, Christ has reached a need we could not. He has become the sacrifice we could not give. He is the Lamb who was slain so that we could bow and sing in the presence of God. The hymnist declares the glory of Christ, the only one who is worthy:

Behold the Lamb of God!

Into the sacred flood

of Thy most precious blood

my soul I cast:

Wash me and make me clean within,

And keep me pure from every sin,

Till this life be past.

Behold the Lamb of God! The Lion of the Tribe of Judah, the Cornerstone, the Shepherd, our Advocate has bowed to death and overcome. The Slain Lamb stands.

________

Copyright © 2005 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate