Judges 14

Ch. 14. The wedding at Timnah Samson asks his parents to arrange a marriage for him in the usual way; but finding them unwilling, he takes the matter into his own hands. There was another way of gaining the bride, and this he determines to adopt. Among the Hebrews, as the present story shews, and among the Arabs in early days, it was considered lawful for a man to contract a union for a limited time; no intervention of the parents was necessary; the woman remained in her own home (cf. Judges 8:31), and was visited at intervals by her husband. An alliance of this kind, for which the Arabic term mot‘a (or ṣ ?adâḳ ?a) marriage1[54] is used, was condemned by Islam as ‘the sister of harlotry,’ and it received no sanction from later Jewish custom or opinion. Accordingly the original tradition of Samson’s marriage has been modified in order to bring it into conformity with prevailing usages, chiefly by the addition of and his father and his mother in Judges 14:5 and by corresponding changes in Judges 14:6-10.

These insertions have introduced confusion into the text, which, however, becomes perfectly intelligible when once they are recognized. See Rob. Smith, Kinship and Marriage in early Arabia, 67 ff., 76; S. A. Cook, Laws of Moses and Code of Ḫ ?ammurabi, 76 f. [54] Mot‘a marriage is defined in Arabic law as ‘marriage for a period,’ Jus Safiticum, ed. Juynboll, p. 195. It was allowed by Mohammed as a temporary concession, and then abrogated; the tradition may be found in Muslim (Cairo, a.h. 1290), vol. i. p. 395. Cf. Jacob, Altarab. Beduinenleben (1897), p. 54. These references are due to Prof. Margoliouth.

Judges 14:1

1. Timnah] now Tibneh, about 4 m. S.W. of Zorah, on the low hills of the Shephçlah: hence went down is the word for reaching it from Samson’s house (Judges 14:1; Judges 14:5; Judges 14:7; Judges 14:10), and go up, for the journey in the opposite direction, Judges 14:2 and 1 Samuel 29:9. According to Joshua 15:10 Timnah lay on the N. border of Judah (cf. 2 Chronicles 28:18), and is assigned to Dan, ib. Joshua 19:43 (P). It is mentioned in the Prism Inscr. of Sennacherib as one of the places which he captured after Altaḳ ?u (Eltekeh), just before he ravaged Judah in 701 b.c., Keil. Bibl. ii. 92 f.

Judges 14:2

2. Samson at first behaves as a dutiful son, and consults both parents about his marriage. It is hardly necessary to strike out the reference to his mother.

Judges 14:3

3. It was the father’s business to arrange a marriage and the amount of the dowry, e.g. Genesis 24:2 ff; Genesis 34:4; Genesis 38:6. Hence the father alone is named in clause b; in cl. a the words and his mother look like an insertion to harmonize with Judges 14:2 : note my people; said is singular. the uncircumcised] A standing term of contempt in Judg. and Sam., pointing to the alien origin of the Philistines, the only uncircumcised people known to the early Israelites; see on Judges 13:1 and cf. 1 Samuel 18:25. A marriage outside the tribe was looked upon with disfavour, Genesis 29:19; both tribal feeling and religious motives would combine against an alliance with a Philistine; cf. Genesis 24:3, Exodus 34:16 (JE), Deuteronomy 7:3.

Judges 14:4

4. It is not actually said that Manoah refused, but the sequel (Judges 14:5-7) in its original form implies that he did. he sought an occasion] The subject is Jehovah, cf. Joshua 11:20; an occasion, i.e. for a quarrel, cf. 2 Kings 5:7. The Philistines had always been the aggressors; an act of retaliation was justifiable. over Israel] Israel as a whole did not yet exist. The generalized statement probably comes from the editor; cf. Judges 13:1.

Judges 14:5

5. and his father and his mother] A later addition made for the purpose of conforming Samson’s marriage to the ordinary type, in which the preliminaries were arranged by the parents. The encounter with the lion and the interview with the woman clearly shew that Samson was alone. a young lion] The lion was once common in Palestine, especially in the desert S. of Judah (Isaiah 30:6), and in the valley of the Jordan; it has disappeared since the time of the crusades.

Judges 14:6

6. came mightily upon him] Cf. Judges 14:19, Judges 15:14, 1 Samuel 10:6; 1 Samuel 10:10; 1 Samuel 11:6; the expression denotes a sudden rush of superhuman power. and he rent him … a kid] rent him as a man rends a kid; the verb only here and in Leviticus 1:17, where it is used of the ritual learing asunder of a fowl in burnt offering. The comparison as one rends a kid may refer to some ceremonial act, as Moore suggests, but we have no evidence of such a practice. Milton’s version, ‘Who tore the lion, as the lion tears the kid,’ Samson Agonistes, l. 128, gets over the difficulty by substituting ‘the lion’ for the indefinite subject (as one rends). The hero’s fight with a lion is a favourite theme in ancient mythology and folk-lore; e.g. the scene represented on early Bab. seals, above, p. 130; the reliefs from the palace of Ashurbanipal (A. Jeremias, l.c. 479); Herakles and the Nemean lion figured on Greek coins1[55]; the stories of David and of Benaiah (1 Samuel 17:34-36, 2 Samuel 23:20). [55] Hill, Catal. of Gk. Coins in the Brit. Mus., Cyprus, Pl. xxv. 6–8; Lycaonia, etc., Pl. xvii. 5, xl. 12. Instances of this motif from ancient sources are collected by Stahn, Die Simson-Sage, 1908, pp. 32 ff. but he told not etc.] The clause introduces some confusion, and may be an interpolation from Judges 14:9.

Judges 14:7

7. Samson acts on his own account; the parents remain at home, and take no part in the arrangements.

Judges 14:8

8. he returned] i.e. to Zorah; the woman stays in her father’s house, as was the rule in a mot‘a marriage. The natural sense of the narrative is destroyed by the expression to take her, i.e. to marry her (a single word in the Hebr.); obviously it has been inserted. The marriage does not begin till later, Judges 14:10. a swarm of bees] Though in a hot country the carcase would quickly decay and shrivel up, some time must have elapsed before the bees could hive in it and form honey-comb. But in a popular story, so full of marvels, this matter-of-fact detail would not be considered. The tale of Onesilus told by Herodotus, 14:114, has been quoted to illustrate the incident. If we wish to look for the origin of this popular story, Stahn (l.c. on p. 140) offers an explanation which is certainly plausible. The connexion between the lion and the honey may be founded on the observed fact that when the sun stands in the sign of Leo, i.e. in the month of May–June, bees in Palestine produce their honey. This would be common knowledge, and would suggest an answer to the riddle in Judges 14:14, which the Philistines might have answered if they had used their wits.

Judges 14:9

9. And he took it … had taken] The word, which occurs only here (? in Jeremiah 5:31), is used in the Talmud for taking honey out of the hive, detaching bread from the sides of the oven; so we may render he scraped off the honey into his palms. It is one of the household words of old Hebrew which rarely find their way into literature (Moore). For wild honey as food cf. 1 Samuel 14:25 ff., St Mark 1:6.

Judges 14:10

10. his father] Again, an insertion. If the father was out of place in Judges 14:5, he is more impossible at this stage. Originally the text ran and he went down … and made, or and Samson went down … and made. a feast] The LXX adds of seven days, perhaps merely an inference from Judges 14:12. The young men mean bridegrooms. It was customary for the wedding feast to be held in the bridegroom’s home (cf. 2Es 9:47, Tob 8:19 f., Judges 11:19, St Matthew 22:2); in the present case, however, Samson gave the feast in the bride’s village, if not in her father’s house, Judges 14:15.

Judges 14:11

11. when they saw him] With a slight change LXX. cod. A etc. read because they feared him; they must be the Philistines, though not mentioned in the context. The sight of Samson, or their fear of him, induced the Philistines to procure thirty companions (cf. Judges 14:20), nominally as friends and supporters, but really in self-defence. The text does not give an altogether satisfactory sense, and may have suffered from alterations. If we read that he brought, which would be an improvement, we must treat when they saw him as an interpolation.

This is Moore’s view, and Budde proposes further re-arrangements; the original state of the verse is not easy to recover. The thirty (cf. Son 3:7 sixty) are of course Philistines, Judges 14:18. At village weddings in Syria the bridegroom is still attended by a body-guard of young men with their leader (Judges 14:20), who superintend the festivities and bear the cost. This ancient institution probably goes back to days when the party really needed protection (Wetzstein, Z. f. Ethnologie, 1873, 288 f.).

Judges 14:12

12. a riddle] This is the only specimen in the O.T. of a riddle in our sense (1 Kings 10:1); elsewhere the word means a sententious maxim Proverbs 1:6, or a parable Ezekiel 17:2. the seven days] Cf. Genesis 29:22; Genesis 29:27, Tob 8:19 f., Judges 11:19. Similarly among the early Arabs (Benzinger, Hebr. Arch.2, p. 109 n.). linen garments] The garment referred to (Hebr. sβdξn, Isaiah 3:23, Proverbs 31:24, perhaps of foreign origin, cf. Assyr. sudinnu) was of fine material, and seems to have been worn sometimes outside the other clothes, sometimes next the skin. The Talmud implies that it was a linen sheet or wrapper of considerable size, and put to various uses. The LXX render by sindτn, cf. Mark 14:51 f., Mark 15:46. changes of raiment] Hebr. ḥ ?alξfτth begβdξm, generally explained as clothes which might be exchanged for ordinary raiment on festal occasions, gala dresses; Genesis 45:22, 2 Kings 5:5; 2 Kings 5:22-23. But ḥ ?alξfτth may be a loan-word from the Babylonian (ḥ ?alβpu = ‘clothe’) with the sense of clothings; if this is the case, the two words ḥ ?alξfτth begβdξm will each mean the same thing (like our ‘dress-clothes’), the foreign word being explained by the native one. It is worth noticing that LXX here render στολὰςἱματίων, and that in Judges 14:19 ḥ ?alξfτth occurs alone, robes.

Judges 14:13

13. The loss of the wager would leave the thirty companions practically naked; no wonder they express themselves strongly in Judges 14:15!

Judges 14:14

14. The riddle is cast into poetical form; the verse consists of two members with three beats in each. The structure of the retort in Judges 14:18 is the same.

Judges 14:15

15. on the seventh day] Would the young men have waited all this time before pressing the woman to extract the answer? In Judges 14:17 she is said to have tried herself to find it out all the seven days. The two statements are inconsistent. The LXX and Peshitto read on the fourth day; but this is suspiciously like what we should expect after in three days Judges 14:14. Most critics think that the numbers in Judges 14:14-15 were added to the original text in order to heighten the difficulty of the riddle and the despair of the Philistines. unto us] LXX unto thee. Samson could not be expected to tell the Philistines himself. to impoverish us] lit. take possession of, dispossess us. The reflex. stem has the meaning come to poverty in Genesis 45:11, Proverbs 20:13 etc. is it not so?] The Hebr. requires a slight correction: ‘was it to impoverish us that ye invited us hither?’ So five Hebr. mss., Targ.

Judges 14:16

16. before him] upon him and Judges 14:17, i.e. on his neck; the same idiom in Genesis 45:15. For the woman’s wile cf. Judges 16:15.

Judges 14:17

17. she pressed him sore] lit. reduced him to straits by her importunity; again in Judges 16:16.

Judges 14:18

18. before the sun went down] lit. went in. But the word for sun (ḥ ?eres) is rare and poetical, and it has the accus. ending which denotes motion towards. A slight correction proposed by Stade gives the right sense: before he went into the chamber, the same word as in Judges 15:1. They wait till the last moment before the wedding was completed.

Judges 14:19

19. The sudden access of superhuman power seems to coincide with the outburst of natural passion, as in Judges 14:6, Judges 15:14. Ashkelon] Perhaps Khirbet ‘Asḳ ?alûn, about 4 m. S. of Tibneh (Timnah), rather than the well-known Ashkelon on the sea-coast, 24 m. or 8 hours distant. The anger ought to precede rather than follow the exploit; but the writer probably did not trouble about logical sequence in his narrative of marvels. There is no need to regard the feat at Ashkelon as a later addition (Moore, Budde, Nowack) because it leads to nothing in the sequel. their spoil] lit. things stripped off a dead enemy, exuviae; only again 2 Samuel 2:21. he went up] without consummating the marriage, as the previous verses seem to imply (esp. Judges 14:18); although it is true that sometimes the consummation took place on the first and not on the last day of the feast, Genesis 29:23.

Judges 14:20

20. After this violent rupture, and to make up for the disgrace inflicted upon the bride, she was given to his groomsman who had acted as his groom; cf. Judges 15:2; Judges 15:6, St John 3:29. LXX. cod. A renders by the technical word νυμφαγωγός, the leader of the bride.