Menu

93 Sermon Illustrations on Romance

93 illustrations Page 2 of 2

Romance in Christian preaching explores the God-ordained affection and deep connection between spouses, emphasizing love as a covenant rather than mere emotion or cultural idealization (Ephesians 5:25). Illustrations often use imagery of courtship, commitment, and enduring love to encourage purity, intentionality, and faithfulness in relationships.

Sermon: Building Better Love

Song of Solomon 8:6

Sermon In Family Concerns Series, #3. Song of Solomon 8:6-7

BUILDING BETTER LOVE

====================

I. Can anybody make it last anymore?

A. A bad time for celebrity marriages.

B. Celebrities aren't the only ones seeking true love.

II. What love is all about.

A. Romance and sex are not the goal.

B. Myths of Intimacy. (#1243)

1) Myth #1: Acceptance is easy.

2) Myth #2: We can make each other happy.

3) Myth #3: If I do my duty, God will change you.

4) Myth #4: Intimacy means being just alike.

III. Biblical love involves a decision of the will.

A. Jesus orders us to love our enemies.

B. Loving when it is hard.

IV. Building your love.

A. Show grace in how you treat each other.

B. Be affectionate.

C. Spend time together.

V. We can love because He first loved us.

A. Jesus is the best example of human love.

B. How can you be like Jesus?

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, Serm08u.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database romanceaffectionmarriagekindness

Take Your Sister Along

John 13:34

The Internet contains a lot of advice on relationships. One site has some interesting suggestions on how to be irresistible to women:

• Be chaste - you shouldn’t even try to kiss on the first date.

• Be optimistic - don’t discuss how oil prices are going through the roof (or about how you think the Tribulation is right around the corner).

• Don’t try to “buy” her. Anything you get her puts her under no obligation to you other than to say “thank you.”

• Listen more and talk less. (That’s right out of the Bible, James 1:19.)

• Here is the clincher - take along another woman. If you are going to a place where people mingle, take your sister with you. Women are more open to talking to men who are with other women. Your sister can help with the small talk, too. [1]

So being irresistible to women takes some work. What does it take to be irresistible to God? Nothing at all! He loves you from his heart, even when you want nothing to do with him.

________

1. Mikhail Chuklai, http://seductiontutor.blogspot.com/2006/09/how-to-be-irresistible-to-women.html.

from (see notes) · Rev. David Holwick via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database god s love

Only Pay Attention To What They Do

John 13:34

One day Randy Pausch met up with an old girlfriend. She gave him some great advice: “It took a long time, but I’ve finally figured it out. When it comes to men who are romantically interested in you, it’s really simple. Just ignore everything they say and only pay attention to what they do.”

from Book: The Last Lecture · Randy Pausch via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database romancewords

Famous Marriages 'Breathe Life' For Couples

Luke 20:34

In 1523, Martin Luther found himself the matchmaker for 12 nuns who had escaped in pickle barrels from a Roman Catholic nunnery near Wittenberg, Germany. He secured husbands for 11, but the 12th, Katharina von Bora, rebuffed two potential husbands. Her heart was set on the great Reformer.

Finally Luther married her in 1525 for strikingly unromantic reasons: to provide his father with grandchildren and to spite the pope by breaking the vow of celibacy he had taken as a Catholic monk. Though it didn’t seem like the makings of a storybook romance, Luther’s marriage to Katie, as he called her, blossomed into one of church history’s most tender unions.

Learning about famous Christian marriages, like Martin and Katie Luther’s, can “breathe life” into the marriages of believers today and “give some guys and their wives courage to get real and be honest,” radio host and marriage expert Dennis Rainey told Baptist Press.

Good marriages demonstrate how a spouse’s love can lift a Christian “out of doubt and discouragement and perhaps even losing heart,” Rainey, president and co-founder of Family Life, said. Stories of more challenging marriages can encourage believers to persevere through their own marriage struggles, he said.

“There was only one who was perfect, and He wasn’t married,” Rainey said. Being part of God’s Kingdom requires “humbling ourselves and admitting our humanity and sharing the stories of our humanity in some of its stench and ... coming clean and getting real -- because that’s where everybody is.”

In contrast with the joyful marriages of Luther, Jonathan Edwards, Charles Spurgeon and others, Methodist movement founder John Wesley and revivalist George Whitefield struggled in their marriages. Wesley made his wife agree that she would not ask him to lighten his schedule of itinerant preaching. The couple eventually separated and she was dead for three days before he found out.

Whitefield once left his wife Elizabeth in America while he returned to England by boat without telling her. One of Whitefield’s protégés said the great revivalist viewed his marriage as a “distraction” and when Elizabeth died, “his mind was put at great liberty.”

“Uncommon unions”

The Luthers’ home was “joyful” and “playful,” Michael Haykin, professor of church history and biblical spirituality at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, told Baptist Press.

“Luther had a deep sense of the joyfulness of the Christian life, and marriage simply exacerbated that,” said Haykin, who has compiled “The Christian Lover,” a book of love letters written by famous Christians.

Though Luther refused to back down in arguments with the pope and fellow Protestant Reformer Ulrich Zwingli, he often yielded to Katie’s opinions and preferences, Haykin said. Among the ways he deferred to her was changing his custom of bathing only once a year -- a common practice in the 1500s -- because “she would not have it so,” according to one of Luther’s letters.

Since the Luthers raised pigs, Martin playfully referred to Katie by such titles as “high mistress of the Wittenberg pig sty,” Haykin said.

Fellow Reformer John Calvin “epitomizes the Protestant rediscovery of marriage,” Haykin said, referencing the Reformation critique of Roman Catholic celibacy vows.

At age 29, Calvin was driven out of Geneva, Switzerland, and settled in Strasbourg, on the border of modern-day Germany and France, where Protestant leader Martin Bucer attempted to find a wife for him. Bucer and other early Protestants believed that a pastor like Calvin should be an expert on family, and ideally be married himself.

The first three or four potential wives proved unsuitable, including one who spoke only German -- a poor match for Calvin who spoke French and didn’t know German. Calvin wrote that he would never marry her “unless the Lord had entirely bereft me of my wits.” Eventually he met and married on his own Idelette de Bure, the widow of an Anabaptist he had known in Geneva.

They were married only eight and a half years before her death; they had experienced two or three pregnancies, though none of their children lived to be more than three days old. Calvin didn’t mention Idelette much in correspondence or sermons, but several surviving letters reveal the depth of their love.

In 1541 a plague raged through Strasbourg, so Calvin sent his wife away for her safety. He wrote to a friend that “day and night my wife has been constantly in my thoughts, in need of advice now that she is separated from her husband.”

When Idelette died in 1549, Calvin wrote, “Mine is no common source of grief. I have been bereaved of the best companion of my life, of one who, had it been so ordered, would not only have been the willing sharer of my indigence, but even of my death. During her life she was the faithful helper of my ministry. From her I never experienced the slightest hindrance. She was never troublesome to me throughout the entire course of her illness; she was more anxious about her children [from her first marriage] than about herself.”

The marriage of Jonathan and Sarah Edwards was “a passionate love story,” Haykin said, noting that Edwards was among the Puritans in England and North America who, among other notable practices, broke from the longstanding tradition of arranged marriages. “The whole idea of falling in love and then getting married is very much rooted in the Puritans,” Haykin said.

Edwards met Sarah when he was 20 and she was 13. She was six feet tall and “striking in terms of her physical beauty,” Haykin said, but “what caught his eye was her spirituality” and love for God. They married in 1727 with Sarah wearing green, which Edwards believed was God’s favorite color.

The mother of 11 children, Sarah was a “fabulous home economist” and Edwards “relied upon her enormously,” Haykin said. On one occasion when Sarah was away from home to attend a funeral, Edwards wrote a letter asking her to “please come home” because “things are falling apart here.”

When Whitefield stayed in the Edwards’ home for five days in 1740, he wrote that he had not seen a “sweeter couple” and began praying that God would provide him with a wife like Sarah.

Among Edwards’ last acts before he died was to give his daughter Lucy a message for Sarah: “Give my kindest love to my dear wife, and tell her that the uncommon union, which has so long subsisted between us, has been of such a nature as I trust is spiritual and therefore will continue forever.”

Charles and Susannah Spurgeon represent another strong marriage from church history, though she had a “very poor first impression” of the great Baptist preacher, Haykin said. The Spurgeons met when he preached for the first time at the London church that came to be known as the Metropolitan Tabernacle.

“He was sweating profusely ... and he pulled out this huge handkerchief with polka dots on it,” Haykin said. “And she thought, ‘What kind of country yokel have the deacons brought in to preach?’” But soon they were married.

Among other strong marriages in church history were Martyn and Bethan Lloyd-Jones, B.B. and Annie Warfield and Francis and Edith Schaeffer.

Challenging marriages

Not all famous Christians, however, enjoyed vibrant marriages. C.T. Studd, a legendary missionary and author of the poem “Only One Life, ‘Twill Soon Be Past,” went to China for some 15 years without his wife Priscilla, Haykin said. Then he returned home only briefly before going to the Congo without her.

Studd “is often held up as a model of total commitment to Christ,” Haykin said. “I have problems with him in my mind because of his marriage.”

Foreshadowing his own marriage troubles, John Wesley once tried to convince his brother Charles that marriage interfered with commitment to Christ. The week before Charles was to be married with John officiating, the brothers began a journey to the wedding site that should have taken two days. But John scheduled so many preaching engagements along the way that they barely arrived in time for the wedding.

“Charles, in his diary, was absolutely furious at his brother,” Haykin said. John “was giving his brother an object lesson ... that preaching the Gospel is more important than marriage.”

When John married two years later, he made sure his wife Molly never interfered with his preaching -- with disastrous results. Molly traveled with him for a year. But after “tramping around the British countryside, sleeping under hedgerows, eating half-cooked meals, she told him she was settling down in London,” Haykin said. “Their marriage then began to disintegrate.”

John and Molly experienced ongoing tension over letters he exchanged with other women. She publicly accused him of infidelity at least once, though no evidence exists to substantiate the charges, and monitored his mail before they separated.

Although Whitefield prayed for a wife like Sarah Edwards, when he married, he was far less considerate as a husband than Jonathan Edwards. Whitefield once wrote that he was “not one of those lovers who is swooning for love at his beloved.”

Haykin said Whitefield demonstrated a consistent “lack of husbandly care of his wife.”

Lessons

Though some may overlook the marriage difficulties of well-known Christians because of their spiritual impact, Haykin sees the matter differently.

“If their marriages would have been solid, I think of how much better their ministries might have been,” he said.

With Wesley, for example, “we don’t see” the impact of his marriage failures “at this distance, and people may not have seen it even in his own day,” Haykin said. “But inevitably it would have had a kickback on ministry. How can he go out to preach the love of God to a crowd and he’s just had a row with his wife? Surely it had some sort of spiritual impact.”

On a positive note, Rainey of Family Life said ministers like Wesley and Whitefield illustrate that God still uses people who don’t “have it all together.”

“I think one of the big fallacies of being in ministry is the lie ... that you have to have it all together in order to preach the Gospel,” Rainey said. People are “desperate” for “authentic human beings who are like them, who fail and then get back up and ask for forgiveness from God and their spouse, or their child, and make things right and keep going.”

But Rainey and Haykin agreed that preachers must have godly marriages.

“Marriage is a reflection of the love of God for His people and for His church,” Haykin said. “ ... Therefore, a Christian pastor who is representing God, speaking God’s Word to His people, if he is married, needs to have a solid marriage.”

________

David Roach is chief national correspondent for Baptist Press, the Southern Baptist Convention’s news service.

Song of Solomon: A Picture of Marriage and Christ

Revelation 1

It’s probably the most popular love story ever written, but its portrayal of marital intimacy has generated no small amount of controversy.

Some Jews forbade men from reading it before age 30. John Calvin once had a man expelled from Geneva in part because of the way he interpreted it. And former Seattle pastor Mark Driscoll drew sharp criticism for using it to describe specific sexual acts.

Should Christians remain above the fray and avoid reading such a provocative love story? No, because it’s in the Bible, it’s inspired by God, and it gives insight into one of Israel’s most significant kings, Baptist seminary professors say.

It’s the Song of Solomon.

“I believe that by teaching our churches the principles of this book, we’ll have stronger marriages, we’ll have parents being more accountable for their children in the teenage years and we’ll have more people waiting to engage in sexual relationships in marriage,” Archie England, professor of Old Testament and Hebrew at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, told Baptist Press.

Solomon’s song?

The first of many mysteries associated with Song of Solomon, also known as Song of Songs, relates to its opening verse: “The Song of Songs, which is Solomon’s.” Bible scholars have long asked whether this means it is by, for or about Solomon, with theological conservatives divided in their answers.

One common view is that King Solomon wrote the book as a young man about an early romance before polygamy with pagan women turned his heart away from God. But some scholars note grammar and vocabulary in the book that seem to reflect a date following Israel’s return from exile in 537 B.C. Still others believe the book was written in Solomon’s time but by someone other than Solomon.

Scholars also are divided on whether to interpret Song of Solomon as a continuous story about one couple or as an assortment of loosely related love songs. During the past century, some have even proposed that the book is a narrative with three main characters rather than two, but England believes that is unlikely.

Regardless of whether the book is one story or several vignettes, it obviously extols the virtue of married love, England said.

Song of Solomon “is probably best described as having been written by somebody who is married now and is so thrilled at the joys of marital bliss,” England said. “Without caution, he’s writing about pursuing the lover, chasing the lover, protecting the lover, discovering the lover, and then all this comes to consummation.”

Perhaps the greatest disagreement associated with Song of Solomon is whether to interpret it as a literal love story or as symbolic of God’s love for His people -- or both.

“The mainstream of the Christian tradition -- be it patristic, medieval, Reformation or the broadly orthodox Protestant tradition down to Spurgeon -- would have allegorized the book in terms of Christ and His church,” Michael Haykin, professor of church history and biblical spirituality at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, told BP. “It’s in the 20th century particularly that you start to find the interpretation of the book leaning toward it being a love song.”

Modern interpreters distinguish between interpreting the book as an allegory, in which even minute details are said to represent aspects of Christian doctrine, and typology, a theological term that describes the practice of interpreting Old Testament persons, objects and practices as generally prefiguring New Testament realities. In typology, not all details of the story are viewed as symbolic.

The “book of romance”?

Beginning sometime after Israel’s return from exile in Babylon, Jews started reading Song of Solomon annually at Passover, viewing it as an illustration of God’s love for Israel. Many contemporary Jews continue this tradition.

By the second or third century A.D., Christians saw Song of Solomon as an allegory. For example, medieval theologian Bernard of Clairvaux saw Chapter 1’s reference to kisses as an allusion to the gift of the Holy Spirit. Eighteenth-century Baptist John Gill regarded a mention of the shulamite’s breasts as symbolic of the Old and New Testaments.

Furthering the symbolic interpretation, section headings in the 1611 King James Bible assumed Song of Solomon pointed to Christ and the church. Headings such as “the church’s love unto Christ” for Chapter 1 and “Christ awaketh the church with His calling” for Chapter 5 persisted in King James Bibles until at least the 1960s.

When Calvin helped expel a foe named Castellio from Geneva in the 1500s, one of the reformer’s complaints was that Castellio interpreted Song of Solomon as a literal love poem.

The pendulum swung by the mid-20th century though, when Tim and Beverly LaHaye began to present the book as “a love manual for married couples,” Haykin said. Seeing Song of Solomon as providing practical instruction in marriage continued with the publication of Tommy Nelson’s popular “The Book of Romance” in 1998 and Daniel Akin’s “God on Sex” in 2003.

Two levels of meaning?

While Haykin believes it is an error to read Song of Solomon as an allegory, he argued that discounting the church’s historic interpretation of the book is a form of “chronological snobbery.”

“We should never lightly discount a received exegetical tradition that has such longstanding consensus,” Haykin said. “It may be wrong. But I’m hesitant to say that as widely diverse figures as Origen, Cyprian, Ambrose, Augustine, Bernard of Clairvaux, Calvin, Andrew Fuller and C.H. Spurgeon are all wrong on this.”

Haykin views Song of Solomon as both describing the relationship between a husband and wife -- although he is “deeply opposed” to seeing it “as a sex manual” -- and picturing the relationship between Christ and His church. Haykin labels his approach to the book typology.

Akin, president of Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, takes a similar approach. But he hasn’t always.

In his book God on Sex, Akin interpreted Song of Solomon almost exclusively as a book about married love. Yet as he prepared to write “Exalting Jesus in Song of Songs,” Akin concluded that the book should be interpreted on two levels.

Solomon, whom Akin believes wrote the book, “is giving us a picture of what marriage was intended by God to be,” Akin told BP. “ ... But I also think the book is anticipating the ultimate relationship between a bride and a bridegroom that is fulfilled in Christ and His church.”

Like Haykin, Akin objects to interpreting the book as an allegory, preferring to label it typology. In “Exalting Jesus in Song of Songs,” Akin includes a section in each chapter about how the passage under consideration points to Christ.

Of particular note, the description of Solomon in chapter 5 bears striking resemblance to the description of Jesus in Revelation 1, Akin said. He added that both Revelation and Song of Solomon end with a call by the bride for her groom to come.

Song of Solomon’s depiction of Solomon as a “shepherd king” would have caused its original Hebrew readers to ask, “Will we ever actually see such a shepherd king on the pages of history love a bride in this kind of a way?” Akin said. “Of course the answer is, yes we do -- in Christ.”

Enriching marriages

Song of Solomon also has practical application to marriage, Akin said. Two important lessons from the book are that Christians should communicate well with their spouses and that they should praise their spouses with specific compliments.

The couple in Song of Solomon is “very quick to extol the good things that they see in their mate,” Akin said. “In other words, they major on the good things, not the bad things. The glass really is half full.”

Song of Solomon “is a book about sex,” Akin said. But “what takes place outside the bedroom is very, very important to what takes place inside the bedroom. If you’ve got a happy couple outside the bedroom, you’re going to have a very happy couple inside the bedroom.”

The Science of Healthy Romantic Relationships

William Chopik is an associate professor of social personality psychology at Michigan State University, and studies how people in relationships evolve over time. He seeks a scientifically approved approach to healthy romantic relationships and finds it in the investment model, based on three key factors. “One is if you are satisfied: do you like your relationship? The next is investment: have you put a lot into the relationship; have you been dating for 10 years; do you have kids together; do you have joint bank accounts? And finally there is quality of alternatives: do you have other options or think you could jump ship to someone better?”

The investment method isn’t “super romantic”, Chopik jokes. But another scientific theory called “perceived partner responsiveness” has been described as the “bedrock” of intimacy by experts. The concept “boils down to the fact that you feel listened to or understood, and that someone is looking out for you.” Rather than someone buying you gifts, but being a lousy listener, it states that being receptive to what your partner needs at any given moment is the key to relationship health.

I’m shocked by how simple the science is: find someone you like, commit to them and make sure they want to support you.

Do we overcomplicate love? “There’s no money in that, though,” Chopik says.

________

Adapted from the article "How ‘love languages’ has been helping couples for 30 years," by Ruchira Sharma.

Virtues Make The Best Valentines

Proverbs 1:7

Valentine’s Day is near and the scramble is on for flowers, gifts, cards and of course, chocolates. Charles Shultz once said, “All you need is love, but a little chocolate now and then never hurts.” Can I get an Amen?

When it comes to love, courtship and romance, everyone searches for the right assortment of ways to express value and affection. Yet I would propose that the best assortment is not found in a box of chocolates (Forest Gump: “You never know what you’re gonna get”), but in an array of “fruit” that adds value and beauty to all who share.

The fruit to which I am referring is a fresh and familiar assortment of virtues produced by the Holy Spirit in our lives as believers: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control.

These virtues offer enduring beauty in a world where vices have marred trust and have fueled injury and fear in relationships.

In recent days, social networks and mainstream news have featured scandalous accusations and sensational revelations concerning a growing list of popular, powerful and prosperous men who are now identified by their vices and abuses toward women. Many of these men have suddenly and catastrophically lost their livelihoods, their families, and will forever bear a brand they had not previously displayed or owned.

With this in mind, I have been reflecting on my own attitudes and praying for ways to challenge the men in my church to raise a new standard of virtue in their hearts and homes with regard to all women, but especially their wives. The word I put before them and want to share with you is a word, a virtue, now lost in a culture consumed with rights and void of responsibility. It is the word, respect. I believe most of our mates would affirm and agree respect is better than roses.

Respect is choosing to take responsibility for the attitudes and actions toward others. Respect is foundational in our relationship with God -- “The fear of the LORD” (Proverbs 1:7) -- and our relationships with others. Respect is at the core of what makes society, community and family work.

How do we choose respect and express respect in our homes? May I offer an assortment of applications for you to read and share?

Live with her according to knowledge. In 1 Peter, husbands are instructed to show great honor and care for their wives based on what they know about them, not what they know about themselves. I am amazed how many men know more about cars, guns, games and teams than they do about their wives. When you value something (respect someone), you know what to do to promote and protect them.

Look at her. Eye contact is a means of showing honor and respect. You know this with your kids, but what about showing this to your wife? She needs to be reminded you only have eyes for her.

Listen to her. If you are like me, I am prone to jump to conclusions in finishing her sentences, to offer an opinion before I have heard her line of thought or offer a solution. What your wife really needs is an open heart and a listening ear.

Lift her up in prayer and before others. Thank God for your wife and pray for her needs. Thank your wife in front of others and let them hear you echo her value to you and your home. Public cynicism and criticism are detrimental to any relationship. What you appreciate, appreciates.

Learn to love what she loves. Guys, we fake it when we are dating and prove it when we are married, don’t we? Don’t bait and switch. Find ways to do what she likes and learn to love what she loves. This will radiate respect.

Limit your schedule to include her. Nothing says, “I value and respect you,” more than making appointments to spend time together. Time is love and love takes time.

Lean on her counsel. This is often difficult for men, yet it is the primary way to express respect through trust. If you are a pastor like me, you feel respected when people heed your counsel, and feel disrespected when they ignore you. The same is true at home.

Lend a hand to help her. When you help your wife with tasks, chores and responsibilities, you are saying, “Who you are and what you do matters to me!”

Respect. Aretha Franklin sang about it (R-E-S-P-E-C-T) and we need a new generation of men to hear it, honor it and heed it.

Respect is better than roses, but don’t forget the roses.

________

David H. McKinley is pastor-teacher of Warren Baptist Church in Augusta, Georgia

[Original illustration at this number was deleted for being obsolete.]

Love Revisited

John 13:1

LOVE REVISITED — by Glenda Lynne

The search for love is unending. Yet few can follow its path, for the path of true Love is as difficult as it is rewarding, and most of us fall along the wayside somewhere. Even at the beginning of a relationship, when we experience the nirvana of discovery, we simultaneously feel the pang of losing it. This duality feeds fear and blocks the way of true Love. Yet, we cannot deny the duality, or we will not love with all our hearts.

To truly experience Love, we must first be willing to look fearlessly into our own hearts and minds. For Love will open us up as nothing else in life can do, and any part of ourselves that we have been hiding will suddenly come skidding into the open to taunt and intimidate us. The moment Love walks in, the shadow part of our self begins to grow. That is because the most exquisite purpose of Love is to force and nurture the growth we have been avoiding. Love pulls out all the stops and slams us into the reality of ourselves.

This is all a part of divine purpose. God intends us to become a part of one heart, a part of the whole. Yet God also intends us to remain totally true to ourselves and to the integrity of our own individuality. It is another one of the dualities that throws many of us off of Love’s path. If we would love, we must be willing to be true to ourselves while being a part of the whole. Love, then, is a microcosm of Life.

In my search for love, I have discovered many things that Love is NOT. Usually, it was a painful process, but as I have grown, it has become a more joyous course. Life is all about learning, and when you learn to love the learning, all of Life becomes joyous. By arduously weeding out the NOT-love, I have come to know much more about what true Love IS. Of course, I am still learning, but here is some of what I’ve discovered.

1. Love is NOT a promise of peace and pleasure everlasting. We do NOT find our soul mates and live happily ever after. That is the biggest fairy tale of all. If we enter into love expecting to find nothing but happiness and peace for the rest of our lives, we are actually entering into a devious place… a place where the beloved exists only to reinforce our present best image of ourselves. The true beloved will do that but will also gently help us to pry free from images that no longer have a relevant purpose in our lives.

2. Love is NOT sexual lust and passion. Sexual lust and passion are a part of love, but they can also be experienced apart from Love. And Love can be experienced in its deepest forms without sexual lust and passion. Sexual lust and passion exist to open us up to the true lust and passion of LIVING. Sexuality and lust and passion activate our vulnerability, and vulnerability is a precursor to growth. If we are to grow, we must be vulnerable.

3. Love is NOT static. Love has seasons and moods and changes. It is the never-ending catalyst to growth. It catapults us into a lifelong series of chrysalis and butterfly. Love is constant rebirth. The only thing we can depend upon in this life is change.

4. Love is NOT possession. We draw close, then apart, then close again, then apart. We exult in one another, then withdraw into our caves. We glory in our togetherness, then go our separate ways. Ceaseless change brings new perspective, new birth, and a constant renewal of ourselves. And sometimes it leaves us alone on our path, grieving and full of self absorption, because the beloved one chooses to move onto a path without us. Deep Love allows the separation of individual purpose and goals.

5. Love is NOT a right. It is a responsibility. We are not born with the innate right to be loved by others. Love is something we earn. It is always here for us to experience, but it will not force itself upon us. We must be willing to walk to the door and open it. Then we must be willing to invite Love in and encourage it to stay.

6. Love is NOT dependent upon one particular person. There is no one soul mate, though we may know only one of them in a particular lifetime. If one soul mate leaves, another will come, when the heart is open and ready to grow again. Being “abandoned” by a lover means only that we are ready for a new experience of Love. We do NOT die of a broken heart. If a loved one departs, and we feel like dying, we are dying of a CLOSED heart. The heart and mind may stubbornly refusing to open to Life’s new possibilities, thus we close off all nurture, and that is a choice to begin to die. It is pure stubbornness, pride, and fear that makes us feel like dying. Why would Life, in all its glory, suddenly abandon us? Love and life do not leave us. People do. That is the nature of this mortal life.

7. Love is NOT desire. Love is sufficient unto itself. It simply IS. It is what it is. If we want to experience true Love, we must let our desire be to flow like a river, to feel the pain of understanding, and to allow the course to take us where it must. We must bless God for each moment of loving and recognize that when we love, we are in the heart of God, and that is a place our minds are too finite to comprehend.

8. Love is NOT a goal. It is a process. It is a part of living, but it is NOT the goal of living. Living is the goal of living. Life is what matters. If we would love, we must first know how to live. For living each moment to its fullest potential IS Love, and that is the goal of Life. As Love is sufficient unto Love, so is Life sufficient unto Life.

9. Love is NOT destructive. Though Love reveals our hidden shadow selves, it does so to illuminate them. Shadows can dance and play with our enlightenment, giving depth and true character to the inner and outer spirit. If the shadows appear to overtake and bury us, then we are no longer experiencing Love. We are experiencing obsession.

10. Love is NOT obsession. When we love with our deepest selves, we never lose our own way. If the beloved’s path and goals become more important than our own, that is not the intention of Love. That is obsession. True love asks only that we ALLOW the beloved to be loved (beloved). When we obsess, we actually shut the process of loving down.

11. Love is NOT completion. We are not here to complete the work. We are here to continue it. The same is true of Love. It does not complete our lives. It continues our lives. Love, as Life, is constantly growing and changing. It is an entity unto itself, and each time we Love, we perpetuate its vision for the Love of God.

12. Love is NOT found outside of ourselves. It comes from within. When we open our deepest self, Love pours out and floods the world around us. Then that very Love we “give away” becomes the seed that blossoms into the Love we “receive”. Love only APPEARS to be coming from outside sources. In actuality, it comes from our own spirit. What we feel is our own Love expressing itself. All of Life is but a perception of who we are.

13. Love is NOT just for lovers. Love is sharing, learning, growing. It is the ultimate Leap of Faith, the willingness to hold a vision for compassion and solicitude for ourselves and our lives, even when all the rest of the outside world would seem to deny it. When we can Love each aspect of ourselves and our lives with the peace that comes from supreme inner knowing, then Love enjoys its finest hour. The lover appears only to share and broaden this hour. Ultimately, it is the Love we feel for ourselves and our own lives that is the truest expression of God’s plan.

14. Love is NOT finite or mortal. It is infinite, immortal, and undying. Love that dies was never Love at all. When we feel true Love, we know that it is never-ending and always available. Anything that is called Love that dies or goes away, is not Love. It is emotion.

15. Love is NOT emotion. Emotions come and emotions go. Emotions are but the ripples upon the surface of our lives. They appear and disappear without touching the depth of our real selves. Love is locked into the essence of ourselves. It is integrity of spirit and purity of intent. It is the truest expression of our God selves, and it is everlasting. If you would experience Love, allow it to flow from the depths of your soul and feel its presence all around you. Lovers leave, but Love does not. Feelings change, but Love remains.

16. Love is NOT controlling. Love is experiential in nature, and control seeks to define and structure experience. Yet Love will not be controlled, nor will it seek to control. The nature of Love is to embrace and allow. It cannot be guided, nor will it be defined. For each of us is an individual expression of God’s infinite wisdom and variety, and each of us experiences Love alone and in our own way. Love is ours to give, but we cannot control its path.

17. Love is NOT something we can share. The final irony of Love’s great gift is that it is experienced ALONE. Sharing Love is an illusion. Love flows, and the instant it moves, it changes. Each thing it touches changes its nature. Each receptor continues its path in a very unique way. Since we can only experience that which we know, we cannot share our love. We can only allow it to flow. When we speak of sharing Love, we are speaking of sharing this unique perception of Love’s flow. Love is an expression, an outpouring of the essence of our God selves, and it is beyond sharing. It is what it is.

Lovers of Life, seek love within. Then open your spirits with no regrets, and allow your Love to pour forth in abundance upon all it may touch. Seek not to direct its path nor follow its course. Seek only to continue its possibilities.

#4700

*

RM-Bible (4/27/99)

MY WIFE

A sigh in the night . . . a smile across a room of strangers . . . a tug at

a sleeve in the middle of a sad movie . . .

THIS IS MY WIFE.

She is a pair of waiting arms for a weary warrior. She repairs frayed

banners torn on daily battle fields . . . she cushions defeats . . . and

makes victories worthwhile . . .

THIS IS MY WIFE.

Her smile can lighten a heavy heart! She can hold a hand and lend an ear .

. . she can blow a kiss . . . and ease a care . . .

She can warm a cold room just by walking through the door . . .

A wife is a secret-sharer . . . she has a private smile that belongs to just

a husband when they both recall a fond and secret memory . . .

A wife is an unpredictable creator. She can remember a word spoken in love

twenty years ago . . . but can t remember to pick up the cleaning.

She s magic with a dish towel in her hands . . . romance running a vacuum

cleaner . . . charm with a smudge of flour on her nose.

A pair of blue-green eyes with faith shining out . . . a head of soft hair

that bounces when she runs . . . a sad pout when things go wrong.

THIS IS MY WIFE

A sweetheart through all the years of man s life . . . a help meet when the

load grows heavy . . . a friend when all other friends have turned their

heads away.

THIS IS MY WIFE

Wives look beautiful in the strangest places . . . like standing in a

doorway or reaching high to take a dish off the shelf . . . or straightening

pillows on the sofa or tucking a child into bed . . . or standing in the

rain waiting for a husband to open the car door.

When a man runs out of heart . . . a wife gives him part of hers . . . she

rekindles the spark of dreams. She can make a husband young again with just

a twinkle in her eye . . .

She s charm, love, enchantment, hope, pride, dreams, pleasure, laughter,

delight, magic, gaiety and Christian womanhood . . . all wrapped into the

most beautiful woman in the world . . .

SHE'S MY WIFE. I LOVE HER.

from Source not recorded · Richard Rogers via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database loveromance

Quotes On Love

John 13:1

"I really only love God as much as I love the person I love the least."

-- Dorothy Day, Catholic social activist

"We do not fall in love, we grow in love and love grows in us."

-- Karl Menninger (The Best of BITS & PIECES)

"One can give without loving, but one cannot love without giving."

-- Amy Carmichael

"Life has taught us that love does not consist in gazing at each other but in looking outward together in the same direction."

-- Antoine de Saint-Exupery (1900-1944), Writer

"Love doesn't make the world go 'round. Love is what makes the ride worthwhile."

-- Franklin P. Jones, humorist, Bits & Pieces 07/08/02

"Love that ends is the shadow of love; true love is without beginning or end."

-- Hazrat Inayat Khan (1882-1927), religious leader, Bits & Pieces 07/08/02

"Man's love is of man's life a thing apart; 'tis woman's whole existence."

-- Lord Byron

"If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion."

-- The Dalai Lama, B&P 8/14/02

"To be loved, be lovable."

-- Ovid (c. 43 B.C.-A.D. 18), Poet, B&P 8/14/02

"I used to always feel the important thing is that people respect me, not love me -- but it is really much nicer when they love you, too."

-- Rudolph W. Giuliani, former Mayor of New York

"Love is not blind. Love is the only thing that sees."

-- Frank Crane

"By loving the unlovable, You made me lovable."

-- Augustine to God

"What, positively, is the will of God? The demand for love. "You shall love your neighbor as yourself!" as the second greatest commandment belongs together with the first: "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength" (Mk. 12:28-34) There is no obedience to God which does not have to prove itself in the concrete situation of meeting one's neighbor, as in Luke (10:29-37). The demand for love surpasses every legal demand; it knows no boundary of limit; it holds even in regard to one's enemy (Mt. 5:43-48).

-- Rudolf Bultmann, Theology of the New Testament, p. 18.

"In order that we may know how to love ourselves, an end has been established for us to which we are to refer all our action, so that we may attain to bliss. For if we love ourselves, our one wish is to achieve blessedness. Now this end is to cling to God. Thus, if we know how to love ourselves, the commandant to love our neighbor bids us to do all we can to bring our neighbor to love God. This is the worship of God; this is true religion; this is the right kind of devotion; this is the service which is owed to God alone."

-- Augustine, "City of God"

"The heart has its reasons which reason knows nothing of."

-- Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), physicist and philosopher (B&P)

"Love - the feeling - is a fruit of love, the verb."

-- Stephen Covey, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People

"When you like someone, you like them in spite of their faults. When you love someone, you love them with their faults."

-- Elizabeth Cameron, B&P 5/12/03

"Love without reverence is a destructive fever; reverence without love is a perpetual frost. True love kneels in reverence; true reverence yearns in love. Each, I say, is essential to the other, and both are needful in the creation of a worthy life. Calvary is the academy in which we may learn reverence and love."

-- Rev. John Henry Jowett (1864-1923), pastor of Fifth Avenue Presbyterian

Church of New York City

“What is the highest, most exalted act of intelligent life? It is to love. Love seeks no cause, no end, no reward beyond itself. ‘I love because I love; I love that I may love.’”

-- St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Blair's Illustrations 1/30/04

"Love is a better master than duty."

-- Albert Einstein, QFTM 3/6/04

“In dreams and in love there are no impossibilities.”

-- Janos Arany

“For aught that I could ever read,

Could ever hear by tale or history,

The course of true love never did run smooth.”

-- William Shakespeare, “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”

“We are all born for love. It is the principle of existence, and its only end.”

-- Benjamin Disraeli, “Sibyl”

“They do not love that do not show their love.”

-- John Heywood, “Proverbs”

“Love sought is good, but given unsought is better.”

-- William Shakespeare, “Twelfth Night”

“Love reckons hours for months, and days for years;

And every little absence is an age.”

-- John Dryden, Amphitryon

“The optimist sees the rose and not its thorns; the pessimist stares at the thorns, oblivious to the rose.”

-- Kahlil Gibran

from Internet: Bits & Pieces, Etc. · (various) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database romancegod s love

Love Is A Decision

If your marriage relationship doesn't have a destination, how will you know when you arrive? And why wait for love to materialize out of stardust, when you could choose excitement and romance - now?

There is a simple yet profound plan for a marriage of depth and warmth and excitement! Plan, you ask? Exactly! Good marriages are no accident. The rules are simple enough; you just need them outlined for you to follow in a profound guide. Tough times can strike any family relationship. But deciding to love - in practical ways outlined here - can result in relationships that are tougher than tough times.

Six elements to staying in love are:

1. Making your spouse feel truly honored

2. Learning the art of touching - tenderly

3. Keeping courtship alive in your marriage

4. Re-opening a heart closed by anger

5. Building - or rebuilding - trust in a relationship

6. Becoming best friends with your family

These six elements are the keys to Love. Love is not an emotion, love is not a feeling, love is not happen-stance. Love is a Decision. Love is waking up every day committed to honoring your mate by implementing the above six keys. If you want to have a great relationship, guess what, it's up to you.

We see so many couples come through our live events and counseling sessions that want us to “fix” them. They want a better, more fun-filled and intimate marriage, but they don't know how to reach it. The most common and most fundamental thing these couples are lacking is the knowledge that love is a decision.

If you want to wake up each and every morning excited about your marriage, then deciding to do this is the first step.

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickId #12523]

from Internet: Messages From the Masters; editor Jim Rohn · Gary Smalley via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database romancelovedecisionhusband wife

If Men Truly Ran the World

If men TRULY ran the world...

1. Valentines would be moved to February 29 so it would only occur in Leap Years.

2. Garbage would take itself out.

3. The only show opposite “ Monday Night Football” would be Monday Night Football from a different camera angle.

4. Instead of an expensive engagement ring you could present your wife with a giant foam hand that said “you're #1.”

5. When your wife/girlfriend needed to talk to you during the game she'd appear in a little box in the corner of the screen during a time-out.

from Source not recorded · Submitted by Richard Jones, Louisville, Kentucky via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database romance

Does the Bible Really Say All That About Romance?

Isaiah 62:5

The Bible speaks not only of ardent love between men and women, but it presents God himself as a lover and his courting of creation as the Great Romance.

The symbol seems a strange one, considering the Christian reluctance to embrace romantic love. Yet it is distinct throughout Scripture. God desires Israel for his bride: "For, as a young man weds a maiden, so you shall wed him who rebuilds you" (Isa. 62:5; all quotations from the NEB). He fondly recalls the days of harmony, "the love of your bridal days, when you followed me in the wilderness" (Jer. 2:2). Yet Israel is unfaithful—God is the unrequited lover. "Will a girl forget her finery or a bride her ribbons? Yet my people have forgotten me over and over again. How well you pick your way in search of lovers!" (Jer. 2:32). God is a passionate lover, and passion can fuel anger. Like the country singer who wonders, "if I saw you, would I kiss you or want to kill you on sight?" God storms at his lover for her prostitution.

After all, he rescued her as a newborn baby lying in her own blood, raised her to full womanhood, gave her fine clothes and jewelry, provided for her the best of foods, and presented her with sons and daughters (Ezek. 16:114). In return, she imperviously fornicates. "How you anger me!" shouts God (Ezek. 16:30). He threatens to turn her over to her many lovers, to strip her naked before them. The lovers will rob her jewelry, stone her, and hack her to pieces (Ezek. 16:39-40).

Which is it, then, kiss or kill?

Wait, for God is the perfect lover. He vents his anger, then whispers: "But now listen, I will woo her, I will go with her into the wilderness and comfort her" (Hos. 2:14). He follows her through fires, floods, dark woods, wherever she goes, then pleads "How shall I deal with you? Your loyalty to me is like the morning mist, like dew that vanishes early." Don't you see, he adds, "loyalty is my desire, not sacrifice" (Hos. 6:4-5). Love will heal: it will reveal the eternal identity and make all things new. Come, God says, and Israel may be "fair as the olive" and "flourish like a vine" (Hos. 14;6-7).

Then the persistent lover takes another tack. He is not out to woo only one tribe, one people, but all, and all of creation. This wild lover will stop at nothing. He condescends and assumes the nature of a slave. He walks among us and heals and proclaims peace and routes demons (and takes up a whip to show some of that old anger too). He demonstrates his power over death by raising the dead, he tells story after story to win our trust. He looks on us adoringly, and yearns, "How often have I longed to gather you children, as a hen gathers her brood under her wings: but you would not let me" (Luke 13:34).

And still we will not let him. He is embarrassing us. He keeps company with prostitutes, for one thing. Sometimes he acts too happy, and he eats and drinks more than a holy man should. Worst of all, he makes outlandish claims that he is the same God who has been chasing us all along. Finally, cruelly, we turn our backs on him once more, and nail his back to a cross.

But he is God, and mad in love enough to bear it, to take all our anger and guilt. Three days later, he is backand this shocks us into trying to love him better. Our infidelity is long and habitual, though, and we still slip often. There are yet many other gods winking at us, seducing us. Our resolve to be unfaithful is weakened, just the same.

We have been betrothed to our "true and only husband" (2 Cor. 11:2). We have seen that love really is stronger than death, stronger than life or angels or principalities or powers or anything else. In the end, there is no fighting it. We already hear fiddles scratching away at a distant feast, and we wonder more and more why we ran so hard from this lover. "Happy are those who are invited to the wedding-supper of the Lamb!" (Rev. 19:9).

We hear much of the wedding day, of great, jubilant crowds rumbling like a dozen waterfalls or rolling thunder. They have stopped running and, at long last, accepted true love. "Alleluia!" they cry. "The Lord our God, sovereign over all, has entered on his reign! Exult and shout for joy and do him homage, for the wedding-day of the Lamb has come! His bride has made herself ready, and for her dress she has been given fine linen, clean and shining" (Rev. 19:7-8).

Ah: the bride. Finally she is made new. God's people bear renewed bodies; bodies sown in humiliation but raised in glory, mortal bodies clothed with immortality (1 Cor. 15:43 and 53). And so suns and moons, rocks and trees, all creation drawn into the heart of God, consummating the praise for which it was made (Ps. 148:5-6). Consumation is what weddings are all about.

Soon, very soon, the wedding of all weddings will begin. Heaven will crash open and the bridegroom appear on a white horse. God's people may yet be panting from their headlong dash away from him, but they will gather breath to shout.

"'Come!' say the Spirit and the bride.

"'Come' let each hearer reply" (Rev. 22:17)

___________________________

This article originally appeared in the Feb. 3, 1984, issue of Christianity Today. At that time Rodney Clapp was CT's editor of arts and sciences. He is now editorial director for Brazos Press.

Copyright © 2001 by the author or Christianity Today, Inc./Christianity Today magazine.

*

from Internet: Online Christianity Today ( C T Classic) · Rodney Clapp via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database romancemarriage

Reflections On Love By Third and Fourth Graders

John 13:1

Reflections on love by third and fourth graders:

WHY DO PEOPLE FALL IN LOVE?

-"One of the people has freckles and so he finds somebody else who has freckles too." Andrew, age 6

-"No one is sure why it happens, but I heard it has something to do with how you smell ... That's why perfume and deodorant are so popular." Mae, age 9

-"I think you're supposed to get shot with an arrow or something, but the rest of it isn't supposed to be so painful." Manuel, age 8

WHAT IS FALLING IN LOVE LIKE?

-"If falling in love is anything like learning how to spell, I don't want to do it. It takes too long." Glenn, age 7

-"Like an avalanche where you have to run for your life." Bart, age 9

HOW DO YOU MAKE LOVE ENDURE?

-"Spend most of your time loving instead of going to work." Dick, age 7

-"Be a good kisser. It might make your wife forget that you never take out the trash." Dave, age 8

12 Ways To Keep Your Love Alive

John 13:1

12 WAYS TO KEEP YOUR LOVE ALIVE

===============================

1. Praise is such a great gift, and it's so easy to give. So look at the things that make your spouse and others unique and develop the habit of praising them for those special things.

2. Every painful trial is like an oyster, and there is a precious pearl-a personal benefit-in every one; every single one.

3. Don't go it alone. Welcome fresh insights of other perspectives-from extended family, friends, good marriage books, or a qualified marriage counselor.

4. In a mutually satisfying relationship, both people's needs are expressed, and they have the flexibility to give and take.

5. Honor goes hand in glove with love, a verb whose very definition is doing worthwhile things for someone who is valuable to us.

6. All our trials, great and small, can bring more of the two best things in life: love for life and love for others.

7. Oneness does not mean that one mate dominates the other or that the stronger controls the weaker.

8. Anger is our choice. We can choose to see its powerful potential for destruction and take steps to reduce it within us. Otherwise, it's and iceberg sinking our love.

9. Better understanding if the motivations and actions that grow out of our basic personalities can help us achieve personal and marital satisfaction.

10. Sharing deep feelings with each other is emotional intercourse, and it's vital to sexual satisfaction.

11. As we reach out to another, our own needs for fulfillment and love are met.

12. Give seven or more praises for every one fault-finding suggestion.

I Love You More, In Perspective

Hallmark card a wife gives to her husband:

Outside: "I love you more today than yesterday!"

Inside: "Yesterday you really got on my nerves."

from New Yorker Magazine, Article: Card Tricks · David Owen via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database loverelationshipsromance

Building Up A Tolerance To Love

“Recent research indicates that, in part at least, what we call `falling in love’ can be attributed to the presence in the body of a drug called `phenyl-thylamine,’ that is a form of natural amphetamine. The problem is...we build up a tolerance for this chemical in about two to four years.”

________

Dr. William Dooley and Dr. Clark Riley

from Internet Sermon · John Ewing Roberts via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database romancemarriagelust

Sermon: Building Better Love

Song of Solomon 8:6

Sermon In Family Concerns Series, #3. Song of Solomon 8:6-7

BUILDING BETTER LOVE

====================

I. Can anybody make it last anymore?

A. A bad time for celebrity marriages.

B. Celebrities aren't the only ones seeking true love.

II. What love is all about.

A. Romance and sex are not the goal.

B. Myths of Intimacy. (#1243)

1) Myth #1: Acceptance is easy.

2) Myth #2: We can make each other happy.

3) Myth #3: If I do my duty, God will change you.

4) Myth #4: Intimacy means being just alike.

III. Biblical love involves a decision of the will.

A. Jesus orders us to love our enemies.

B. Loving when it is hard.

IV. Building your love.

A. Show grace in how you treat each other.

B. Be affectionate.

C. Spend time together.

V. We can love because He first loved us.

A. Jesus is the best example of human love.

B. How can you be like Jesus?

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, Serm08u.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database romanceaffectionmarriagekindness

Marriage As Therapy Or Covenant?

Last week, another prominent couple made headlines by announcing the end of their marriage. It was former vice president Al Gore and his wife. I know both of them and always thought they were a perfect couple.

I am disappointed for them and saddened. Indeed, that seems to be the overwhelming reaction from the public and the media. Many, who saw the Gores as an ideal, loving couple who enjoyed and endured the ups and downs of public life together, wondered aloud if the Gore’s couldn’t keep going after 40 years, who can?

Well, that depends, as does so much, on your worldview.

And a perfect case in point is an article from last Friday’s New York Times entitled, “What Brain Scans Tell Us About Marriage.”

Author Tara Parker-Pope reported on recent research into the neuroscience of happy marriages. She cites one study in which 17 madly-in-love couples underwent a brain scan. When an individual was shown a picture of his or her spouse — ta-da! — the scan showed activity in that part of the brain associated with romance. In older couples, Parker-Pope writes, “researchers spotted something extra: parts of the brain associated with deep attachment were also activated.”

The researcher, Dr. Bianca Acevedo explained, “They have the feelings of euphoria, but also the feelings of calm and security that we feel when we’re attached to somebody.”

Dr Acevedo added, “I think it’s wonderful news.”

And I do, too. Parker-Pope, after highlighting the key to a happy marriage, asks two questions that highlighted for me exactly why marriages today are crumbling. One, “how much does your partner provide a source of exciting experiences?” And two, “how much has knowing your partner made you a better person?”

What do these two questions have in common? They are the epitome of the postmodern, therapeutic worldview — the worldview that asks one and only one question: What’s In It For Me?

Thus Parker-Pope can end her article on a happy postmodern note, quoting a Wharton School Economist: The Gores “had 40 years of marriage ... The fact that they both can look forward and see a promising future by not being married [is] a celebration about how much optimism they have for the rest of their lives.”

Well, I cannot put such a happy face on divorce, nor do I mean to single out the Gores for criticism. Far from it, because I know all too well the pain divorce creates.

But I can’t stop from noticing how far our culture has drifted from the faith that founded it. Even 40 years ago, marriage was seen as a covenant, a sacrament in some traditions — a promise before God between a man and a woman to be faithful to one another until death did them part. Not seeking the good for one’s self, but the good of the other.

But in our therapeutic culture, as Parker-Pope’s questions illuminate so brilliantly, this has been turned 180 degrees. Marriage is now just another path, or obstacle, to self-fulfillment.

Please don’t tell me worldviews don’t matter. Or that they can’t shape a culture. We’ve gone in 40 years from the Christian belief in a lifelong commitment to seeing divorce as the start of a promising future. Please.

________

Copyright (c) 2010 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

Only Pay Attention To What They Do

John 13:34

One day Randy Pausch met up with an old girlfriend. She gave him some great advice: “It took a long time, but I’ve finally figured it out. When it comes to men who are romantically interested in you, it’s really simple. Just ignore everything they say and only pay attention to what they do.”

from Book: The Last Lecture · Randy Pausch via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database romancewords

Virtues Make The Best Valentines

Proverbs 1:7

Valentine’s Day is near and the scramble is on for flowers, gifts, cards and of course, chocolates. Charles Shultz once said, “All you need is love, but a little chocolate now and then never hurts.” Can I get an Amen?

When it comes to love, courtship and romance, everyone searches for the right assortment of ways to express value and affection. Yet I would propose that the best assortment is not found in a box of chocolates (Forest Gump: “You never know what you’re gonna get”), but in an array of “fruit” that adds value and beauty to all who share.

The fruit to which I am referring is a fresh and familiar assortment of virtues produced by the Holy Spirit in our lives as believers: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control.

These virtues offer enduring beauty in a world where vices have marred trust and have fueled injury and fear in relationships.

In recent days, social networks and mainstream news have featured scandalous accusations and sensational revelations concerning a growing list of popular, powerful and prosperous men who are now identified by their vices and abuses toward women. Many of these men have suddenly and catastrophically lost their livelihoods, their families, and will forever bear a brand they had not previously displayed or owned.

With this in mind, I have been reflecting on my own attitudes and praying for ways to challenge the men in my church to raise a new standard of virtue in their hearts and homes with regard to all women, but especially their wives. The word I put before them and want to share with you is a word, a virtue, now lost in a culture consumed with rights and void of responsibility. It is the word, respect. I believe most of our mates would affirm and agree respect is better than roses.

Respect is choosing to take responsibility for the attitudes and actions toward others. Respect is foundational in our relationship with God -- “The fear of the LORD” (Proverbs 1:7) -- and our relationships with others. Respect is at the core of what makes society, community and family work.

How do we choose respect and express respect in our homes? May I offer an assortment of applications for you to read and share?

Live with her according to knowledge. In 1 Peter, husbands are instructed to show great honor and care for their wives based on what they know about them, not what they know about themselves. I am amazed how many men know more about cars, guns, games and teams than they do about their wives. When you value something (respect someone), you know what to do to promote and protect them.

Look at her. Eye contact is a means of showing honor and respect. You know this with your kids, but what about showing this to your wife? She needs to be reminded you only have eyes for her.

Listen to her. If you are like me, I am prone to jump to conclusions in finishing her sentences, to offer an opinion before I have heard her line of thought or offer a solution. What your wife really needs is an open heart and a listening ear.

Lift her up in prayer and before others. Thank God for your wife and pray for her needs. Thank your wife in front of others and let them hear you echo her value to you and your home. Public cynicism and criticism are detrimental to any relationship. What you appreciate, appreciates.

Learn to love what she loves. Guys, we fake it when we are dating and prove it when we are married, don’t we? Don’t bait and switch. Find ways to do what she likes and learn to love what she loves. This will radiate respect.

Limit your schedule to include her. Nothing says, “I value and respect you,” more than making appointments to spend time together. Time is love and love takes time.

Lean on her counsel. This is often difficult for men, yet it is the primary way to express respect through trust. If you are a pastor like me, you feel respected when people heed your counsel, and feel disrespected when they ignore you. The same is true at home.

Lend a hand to help her. When you help your wife with tasks, chores and responsibilities, you are saying, “Who you are and what you do matters to me!”

Respect. Aretha Franklin sang about it (R-E-S-P-E-C-T) and we need a new generation of men to hear it, honor it and heed it.

Respect is better than roses, but don’t forget the roses.

________

David H. McKinley is pastor-teacher of Warren Baptist Church in Augusta, Georgia

[Original illustration at this number was deleted for being obsolete.]

Experts Say Life's Ups, Downs Can Take Toll On Relationships

Midlife particularly can test a marriage relationship, counselors say. Grief over the death of a parent or even a child, dreams not realized and opportunities missed can cause one or both partners to question their purpose in life.

In a society that puts increasing value on the worth and fulfillment of the individual, a dangerous dilemma can emerge: How do I find "me" without giving up "us?"

Gail and Steve Brookshire of Dallas work hard to find the balance.

"Steve helps me to be an individual while we're being a couple," Gail said of her husband of 19 years. "He's made it a priority for me to be able to advance professionally and personally.... He helps me to have time by myself to go on retreat or pray. He helps me to have the time away to rejuvenate. Most spouses might not even feel that they could be away."

Yet, Gail added, their marriage also has been strengthened by what they do together - especially learning and laughing.

"We love to learn together - art galleries, poetry, stuff that's totally different from what our backgrounds are," said Gail, a genetics counselor. "We haven't ever gotten to the place where we're at a dead-end. It keeps it fun."

"We laugh together," she continued. "We reflect on where we've come from - our families. Nothing's so sacred that we can't laugh about [it]."

But Gail and Steve have an advantage over some couples. "We have a common Christian faith that we share that matters a lot between us," she said. "It's not true always as a bond for relationships to share. It has reoriented everything, including how we spend our money and our time."

The Brookshires are committed to working on "the rough spots" in their personalities, which requires a lot of trust, Gail said. "We have an environment where it feels safe with each other."

"Folks go in and out of relationships like changing socks, and they don't want to do the work that it takes. ... You have to be ready to do the work."

Predicting when marital conflict might hit is difficult. But counselors agree there are points along the way that stress relationships in particular. Some of them come surprisingly early, while others arrive later.

For couples with adult children, a period that hits about two or three years after the nest empties can be tricky. Suddenly, the couple is alone with each other. If they haven't been staying in touch along the way, it is treacherous to suddenly have to become reacquainted. This person who only resembles your original marriage partner is now your only roommate. Vulnerability to frustration and romantic affairs springs from unresolved issues in the relationship.

In the bestseller "The Bridges of Madison County," author Robert James Waller portrays a woman dealing with the disappointments of her rural Iowa farm life. Along the way, she and her husband have fallen into sloppy communication and very low maintenance of their romance. With her husband and children gone for a few days, she engages in a brief affair with a National Geographic photographer, portrayed in the movie version by Clint Eastwood. Her new lover offers her the chance to leave it all behind and travel the world with him. But she chooses to stay, keeping until her death the secret of her torrid affair.

Counselor Robert Herron said "the romantic mirage of Madison County" poses problems for couples in all stages of life, but particularly those at midlife. "Frequently, it is the marriage that is judged defective, rather than the mirage," he said.

If couples are to grow as persons and in their marriage, Herron said, partners have to give up the simplistic, magical notions and replace them with maturing, grounded love and commitment.

If you haven't made it to Madison County yet, "be happy about it," Herron said. "In the real world, which is the only world we have, we don't have to love perfectly at midlife. Love is not a four-day extravaganza. It's a lifelong process of learning."

*

RM-Bible (4/27/99)

MY WIFE

A sigh in the night . . . a smile across a room of strangers . . . a tug at

a sleeve in the middle of a sad movie . . .

THIS IS MY WIFE.

She is a pair of waiting arms for a weary warrior. She repairs frayed

banners torn on daily battle fields . . . she cushions defeats . . . and

makes victories worthwhile . . .

THIS IS MY WIFE.

Her smile can lighten a heavy heart! She can hold a hand and lend an ear .

. . she can blow a kiss . . . and ease a care . . .

She can warm a cold room just by walking through the door . . .

A wife is a secret-sharer . . . she has a private smile that belongs to just

a husband when they both recall a fond and secret memory . . .

A wife is an unpredictable creator. She can remember a word spoken in love

twenty years ago . . . but can t remember to pick up the cleaning.

She s magic with a dish towel in her hands . . . romance running a vacuum

cleaner . . . charm with a smudge of flour on her nose.

A pair of blue-green eyes with faith shining out . . . a head of soft hair

that bounces when she runs . . . a sad pout when things go wrong.

THIS IS MY WIFE

A sweetheart through all the years of man s life . . . a help meet when the

load grows heavy . . . a friend when all other friends have turned their

heads away.

THIS IS MY WIFE

Wives look beautiful in the strangest places . . . like standing in a

doorway or reaching high to take a dish off the shelf . . . or straightening

pillows on the sofa or tucking a child into bed . . . or standing in the

rain waiting for a husband to open the car door.

When a man runs out of heart . . . a wife gives him part of hers . . . she

rekindles the spark of dreams. She can make a husband young again with just

a twinkle in her eye . . .

She s charm, love, enchantment, hope, pride, dreams, pleasure, laughter,

delight, magic, gaiety and Christian womanhood . . . all wrapped into the

most beautiful woman in the world . . .

SHE'S MY WIFE. I LOVE HER.

from Source not recorded · Richard Rogers via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database loveromance

Midlife Poses Challenges To Marriage Relationship

"I know that neither one of us has anything left to give," a desperate Wendy Erwin told her husband, a New Jersey pastor, over the phone. "But I love you and we're going to make it."

With those words, she grabbed the lone thread that would hold her marriage together over the next few months.

For Wendy and Scott, their 11-year-old marriage had come to the brink. After a whirlwind romance and two storybook years of married life, a series of personal crises gradually dragged their relationship into despair.

First came a change in career direction, the first hint that things weren't going according to plan. Then came two ectopic pregnancies that resulted in miscarriages.

Then twin daughters were born, but both developed severe health problems. While Grace would overcome most of them, Katie was left with serious, multiple handicaps.

The resulting emotional, spiritual and financial stress pulled their marriage apart. Communication became almost non-existent. They stopped nurturing each other. "We were sleep-deprived, depressed and emotionally exhausted," Scott told Faithworks magazine.

Added Wendy: "It wasn't unusual for us to say, 'I love you, but I have nothing for you. I'm not angry at you, but I just can't offer you more than commitment. My resources are gone.' We lived that way for two-and-a-half years. We were dying inside, losing one another as partners, and staying together only because neither of us could do this alone."

Counselors agree that, more often than not, a marriage relationship doesn't flame out in a burst of betrayal or anger as much as it simply grows weaker over time. Opportunities to do maintenance are missed. Warning signs are ignored. Eventually the marriage is enveloped by the slow, encroaching darkness of alienation.

Many people have already given up on the ideal of lifelong marriage, as evidenced by increases in both cohabitation and divorce. Half of all marriages are disrupted by divorce or separation within 20 years.

So how does anyone make it to midlife with their marriage intact?

"The turning point as I see it was that we realized that we had to find a way to stay together," Scott recalled.

Disappointed with life and frustrated with God, the young couple clung only to their commitment to stay together. Finally, their breakthrough came in late 2001 with a change of jobs and location. "We moved to Virginia and not only reduced the financial pressures, but got a new start," Scott said. "Slowly we started to talk with each other. We would turn the TV off and figure out who we were."

"Only after we got to some level of healthy interaction could we really stir God back into the mix," he continued. "For a while, God was a hiding place or a pawn we used in arguing. We began to pray together and we discovered that it's pretty tough to stay frustrated with a person you're sharing prayer time with. Then, we noticed that we were beginning to think of each other first in some things. I saw that Wendy needed me to be at home and to help out. I couldn't just be a pastor and then come home and sit down.

"Eventually we began to date again. We've fallen in love again. And that's weird because we're totally not the same people who met on the beach all those years ago. It's a true starting over, figuring out who we are and where God fits into that equation. I wouldn't say we're where we want to be in communication, role negotiation and other important skills. We still have moments of intense grief, as you will when you have a special-needs child. But we aren't in crisis now by a long shot."

Few marriages that last remain unchanged. On the contrary, counselors say being able and willing to change is a key to marriage survival.

If a couple is willing to work on building and maintaining a solid relationship, they can arrive at midlife - and survive it - with a strong, healthy marriage. But the journey starts even before the wedding, and it involves daily attention.

To simply conduct a wedding and then send the newlyweds out to fend for themselves is a dangerous way to start a marriage, said Robert Herron director of the Presbyterian Counseling Center in Greensboro, N.C.

Herron spearheaded a 1996 dialogue among clergy in the community about the problem of failed marriages. It resulted in a covenant committing the ministers - and all couples they married - to a waiting period before the wedding, counseling sessions, an in-depth analysis of each relationship, enrichment opportunities for the couples, and a support network to mentor the newly married. By 1998, more than 70 churches had signed on.

Herron said efforts like the one in Greensboro help couples anticipate the issues they'll face and develop sound practices to maintain the marriage partnership.

Bo Prosser, an associate pastor in Charlotte, N.C., has been involved in marriage counseling and marriage enrichment for years. "When I prepare a young couple for marriage, I stress to them that they're not just two people anymore. We're three now. I can't be with them everywhere they go, but they can call me anywhere I am, anytime of the day or night, if they get in trouble. They have to know that there are others who will support them and have gone where they're going."

Prosser said communication and commitment are the two stackpoles around which everything else in a marriage falls into place. Communication involves both skill and constant care, he said. "You have to practice it every day."

"They have to understand that the person they married at 25 isn't the same anymore at 45," said Wade Rowatt, director of the St. Matthews Counseling Center in Louisville, Ky. Adjusting to those changes is some of the hardest work in marriage, Rowatt said.

"We change as individuals, but somehow we expect our marriage relationship to continue to operate on the same practices and rules," Rowatt said. Those personal changes are easily overlooked when assessing a marriage relationship.

Wendy Erwin sees now that she and Scott had different expectations of marriage, shaped by their different family backgrounds. "As we grew, we grew into our own patterns. ... We worked constantly to please one another but never stopped long enough to step back and realize that we had different lenses on."

As with the Erwins, a deep commitment to preserve the marriage - above all else - is the essential ingredient in overcoming a lifetime of changes and challenges, Rowatt said.

"Commitment has to be both intellectual and emotional in nature or it won't be balanced enough to see us through," he added. On the days when the romantic side of the marriage doesn't seem real, the fact that you once loved a person enough to marry him or her may be the only beacon to follow out of the darkness.

*

Getting yoked with someone

The Yoke's On You

Two beasts are bound with common yoke,

A heavy load to bear.

If oxen both, or donkeys both,

The burden they can share.

They draw the load with common force

They step with balanced gait

They walk in steady partnership

Each equal with its mate.

But what if ox and ass are joined

And made to share the load

Both yoked together, two-as-one,

To journey down the road?

The ox's greater stride and strength

The donkey cannot match

The yoke that binds the two as one

Begins to wear and catch.

Each beast itself could do the job

If yoked with its own kind---

When bound with one of different breed

The yoke will chafe and bind

The lesson of the ox and ass

Is one that should ring true.

Consider well your partner's heart

Before the yoke's on you.

Love Is A Decision

If your marriage relationship doesn't have a destination, how will you know when you arrive? And why wait for love to materialize out of stardust, when you could choose excitement and romance - now?

There is a simple yet profound plan for a marriage of depth and warmth and excitement! Plan, you ask? Exactly! Good marriages are no accident. The rules are simple enough; you just need them outlined for you to follow in a profound guide. Tough times can strike any family relationship. But deciding to love - in practical ways outlined here - can result in relationships that are tougher than tough times.

Six elements to staying in love are:

1. Making your spouse feel truly honored

2. Learning the art of touching - tenderly

3. Keeping courtship alive in your marriage

4. Re-opening a heart closed by anger

5. Building - or rebuilding - trust in a relationship

6. Becoming best friends with your family

These six elements are the keys to Love. Love is not an emotion, love is not a feeling, love is not happen-stance. Love is a Decision. Love is waking up every day committed to honoring your mate by implementing the above six keys. If you want to have a great relationship, guess what, it's up to you.

We see so many couples come through our live events and counseling sessions that want us to “fix” them. They want a better, more fun-filled and intimate marriage, but they don't know how to reach it. The most common and most fundamental thing these couples are lacking is the knowledge that love is a decision.

If you want to wake up each and every morning excited about your marriage, then deciding to do this is the first step.

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickId #12523]

from Internet: Messages From the Masters; editor Jim Rohn · Gary Smalley via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database romancelovedecisionhusband wife

Does the Bible Really Say All That About Romance?

Isaiah 62:5

The Bible speaks not only of ardent love between men and women, but it presents God himself as a lover and his courting of creation as the Great Romance.

The symbol seems a strange one, considering the Christian reluctance to embrace romantic love. Yet it is distinct throughout Scripture. God desires Israel for his bride: "For, as a young man weds a maiden, so you shall wed him who rebuilds you" (Isa. 62:5; all quotations from the NEB). He fondly recalls the days of harmony, "the love of your bridal days, when you followed me in the wilderness" (Jer. 2:2). Yet Israel is unfaithful—God is the unrequited lover. "Will a girl forget her finery or a bride her ribbons? Yet my people have forgotten me over and over again. How well you pick your way in search of lovers!" (Jer. 2:32). God is a passionate lover, and passion can fuel anger. Like the country singer who wonders, "if I saw you, would I kiss you or want to kill you on sight?" God storms at his lover for her prostitution.

After all, he rescued her as a newborn baby lying in her own blood, raised her to full womanhood, gave her fine clothes and jewelry, provided for her the best of foods, and presented her with sons and daughters (Ezek. 16:114). In return, she imperviously fornicates. "How you anger me!" shouts God (Ezek. 16:30). He threatens to turn her over to her many lovers, to strip her naked before them. The lovers will rob her jewelry, stone her, and hack her to pieces (Ezek. 16:39-40).

Which is it, then, kiss or kill?

Wait, for God is the perfect lover. He vents his anger, then whispers: "But now listen, I will woo her, I will go with her into the wilderness and comfort her" (Hos. 2:14). He follows her through fires, floods, dark woods, wherever she goes, then pleads "How shall I deal with you? Your loyalty to me is like the morning mist, like dew that vanishes early." Don't you see, he adds, "loyalty is my desire, not sacrifice" (Hos. 6:4-5). Love will heal: it will reveal the eternal identity and make all things new. Come, God says, and Israel may be "fair as the olive" and "flourish like a vine" (Hos. 14;6-7).

Then the persistent lover takes another tack. He is not out to woo only one tribe, one people, but all, and all of creation. This wild lover will stop at nothing. He condescends and assumes the nature of a slave. He walks among us and heals and proclaims peace and routes demons (and takes up a whip to show some of that old anger too). He demonstrates his power over death by raising the dead, he tells story after story to win our trust. He looks on us adoringly, and yearns, "How often have I longed to gather you children, as a hen gathers her brood under her wings: but you would not let me" (Luke 13:34).

And still we will not let him. He is embarrassing us. He keeps company with prostitutes, for one thing. Sometimes he acts too happy, and he eats and drinks more than a holy man should. Worst of all, he makes outlandish claims that he is the same God who has been chasing us all along. Finally, cruelly, we turn our backs on him once more, and nail his back to a cross.

But he is God, and mad in love enough to bear it, to take all our anger and guilt. Three days later, he is backand this shocks us into trying to love him better. Our infidelity is long and habitual, though, and we still slip often. There are yet many other gods winking at us, seducing us. Our resolve to be unfaithful is weakened, just the same.

We have been betrothed to our "true and only husband" (2 Cor. 11:2). We have seen that love really is stronger than death, stronger than life or angels or principalities or powers or anything else. In the end, there is no fighting it. We already hear fiddles scratching away at a distant feast, and we wonder more and more why we ran so hard from this lover. "Happy are those who are invited to the wedding-supper of the Lamb!" (Rev. 19:9).

We hear much of the wedding day, of great, jubilant crowds rumbling like a dozen waterfalls or rolling thunder. They have stopped running and, at long last, accepted true love. "Alleluia!" they cry. "The Lord our God, sovereign over all, has entered on his reign! Exult and shout for joy and do him homage, for the wedding-day of the Lamb has come! His bride has made herself ready, and for her dress she has been given fine linen, clean and shining" (Rev. 19:7-8).

Ah: the bride. Finally she is made new. God's people bear renewed bodies; bodies sown in humiliation but raised in glory, mortal bodies clothed with immortality (1 Cor. 15:43 and 53). And so suns and moons, rocks and trees, all creation drawn into the heart of God, consummating the praise for which it was made (Ps. 148:5-6). Consumation is what weddings are all about.

Soon, very soon, the wedding of all weddings will begin. Heaven will crash open and the bridegroom appear on a white horse. God's people may yet be panting from their headlong dash away from him, but they will gather breath to shout.

"'Come!' say the Spirit and the bride.

"'Come' let each hearer reply" (Rev. 22:17)

___________________________

This article originally appeared in the Feb. 3, 1984, issue of Christianity Today. At that time Rodney Clapp was CT's editor of arts and sciences. He is now editorial director for Brazos Press.

Copyright © 2001 by the author or Christianity Today, Inc./Christianity Today magazine.

*

from Internet: Online Christianity Today ( C T Classic) · Rodney Clapp via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database romancemarriage

When Marriage Isn't God's Will

At a magazine publishing workshop in New York some years ago, I heard a financial counselor say that he’d never been able to talk anyone out of launching a new publication.

An expert in the field, he was often consulted on business plans, legal hurdles, and such, and in many cases, the figures just didn’t add up. By all reasonable expectations, the periodical was going to fail and the publisher’s bank account would take a major hit. Never mind that. Once the publishing bug bit, there was little or nothing you could say to dissuade them from economic self-harm. So, with a smile, he said he simply tried to facilitate the realization of their expensive dreams and minimize the damage that was almost sure to come. There was no fighting the romance of it all.

Another speaker surveyed a single year’s launches, as many as three a week in the U.S., as I recall. It was the age of niche magazines, and probably still is. For instance, the preceding 12 months saw the publication of, not just a new hunting magazine, but two new turkey hunting magazines. How could they possibly both survive? Again, it probably didn’t matter that much. The publishers were satisfied simply to be in print. It was the stuff of dreams.

Recently, I’ve been reminded of that workshop, but in a different connection. I never stop marveling at the way in which those who profess Christ will barge ahead with romances and even marriage plans where the Bible gives them no encouragement whatsoever. When the “love” bug bites, they will toss aside scruples, ignore Scripture, alienate their believing friends, horrify their family and embarrass the church. They will even fornicate and cohabitate as they slide into marriage. And though they may make a gesture or two toward breaking it off, they’ll then mope around as martyrs, only to spring back into each other’s arms at the slightest prompting from their fevered brows. As a ministerial colleague volunteered last week, there’s virtually no talking them out of it.

I have tried to dissuade them. And prayed. I remember one afternoon when my wife, Sharon, and I were on our knees at home in the hour before an illicit wedding involving one of our church members was to occur. I had preached God’s standard pointedly, taken stands in my wedding policy and caught the heat publicly. Through it all, the man in question had been my friend, and then he went right out and “followed his heart” away from the wife of his youth to marry a woman who had “followed her heart” away from the husband of her youth, right before our eyes. It was astonishing. “But surely God wanted them to be happy – and he would forgive them.” So the reasoning went, I suppose.

Why is this so? I can think of two reasons right off: relationship idolatry and mission deficit.

Of course, some folks dream of riotous, hedonistic living. Still others fantasize about pulling the levers of power in the highest corporate or governmental councils, not for the public good, but for their own gratification and aggrandizement. But most people would be satisfied with someone who would hold them on a cold night, offer a sympathetic shoulder to cry on, darn their socks or chop their wood, laugh with them over the intricacies of domesticity, buy them presents, plan trips with them and accompany them to entertainments. They just want someone who will make them feel good in a warmhearted sort of way. Who doesn’t?

Relationships can be wonderful -- unless, that is, they violate God’s counsel. But God’s counsel is usually displaced in this culture, relegated to the back shelves, well behind the prime stock of affections, affirmations and commiserations. Even in church. Some call it the “Oprahfication of America.” Holiness is nice, but it doesn’t have a chance up against feelings.

Second, being “unequally yoked” or “living in sin” has little effect on spiritually useless lives. If there is no ministry to damage, no ministry gets damaged. With or without the stain of sexual or marital indiscretion, a vapid life is still vapid, at least in Kingdom terms. If you have no sense of teamship in marriage for the sake of the Great Commission, you hardly notice the loss when the very ground of that teamship –- holy matrimony between a consecrated man and woman -– is ignored.

Which brings me to Lottie Moon, the namesake of Southern Baptists’ annual offering for International Missions. She was engaged to Crawford Toy, a rising star in the universe of Baptist, and indeed American, academia. But when she found his treatment of Scripture objectionable, she walked away from the relationship and chose a life of sacrificial solitude half a world away. Consider this passage from Irwin Hyatt’s book, “Our Ordered Lives Confess: Three 19th Century Missionaries in East Shantung” (Harvard, 1976), found at the SBC website:

Professor Toy, as he had now become, wrote reproposing marriage

and suggesting mission work together in Japan. ... He was known

as a brilliant linguist and theologian. Following the Civil War

he had studied in Europe, where he was exposed to Darwinian

theory and to “the new ideas of the German scholars” on Old

Testament history and inspiration.... Her conclusion was that

... evolution was for her an “untenable position.” ... Later in

China, heated letters arrive, and “The temptation is great.” The

professor, however, now espouses theories that “do not square

with God's Word.” Rejecting C.H. Toy, Harvard and glory, Miss

Moon says, “My cross is loneliness....”

Of course, Lottie Moon was concerned with relationships, but those that mattered most were with her Lord and with the Chinese people to whom he sent her on mission. She could have consorted and snuggled with Professor Toy in Massachusetts or Japan, but she knew that he was not her soulmate on mission for the Lord. This was quite enough to end that romance and free her for heroic service in Christ.

Those seeking marriage outside the counsel of God often quote the Genesis verse that says it was not good for Adam to be alone. I’ve just passed the life-sized portrait of Lottie Moon, hanging in Southern Seminary’s Honeycutt Center, and I’ve been reminded that she was not at all alone. Standing around her are five Chinese beneficiaries of her life, prepared to say, “Thank you, Miss Moon” (and not “Mrs. Toy”).

________

Mark Coppenger is pastor of Evanston (Ill.) Baptist Church and distinguished professor of apologetics at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Ky. Reprinted from the Illinois Baptist newsjournal, online at WWW.IBSA.ORG/ILLINOISBAPTIST.

*

[Original illustration at this number was deleted for being obsolete]

Sorry, Tolstoy, Happy Couples Aren't All Alike

More than a century ago, Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy wrote, “Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.”

The words have become immortalized, and the unhappy story of “Anna Karenina” is considered one of the greatest novels ever written. But psychologists and sociologists are starting to question the observation.

“I think Tolstoy was totally wrong,” said John Gottman, a psychology professor at the University of Washington in Seattle. “Unhappy families are really similar to one another - there's much more variability among happy families.”

Gottman and others are trying to understand why as many as one in two marriages end in divorce and why so many couples seem to fall out of love and break apart.

Some of the most revealing answers, it turns out, come from the couples who stay together.

While conventional wisdom holds that conflicts in a relationship slowly erode the bonds that hold partners together, couples who are happy in the long term turn out to have plenty of conflicts, too.

Fights and disagreements are apparently intrinsic to all relationships, but couples who stay together over the long haul don't let the fighting contaminate other parts of the relationship, experts say.

“Why do people get married in the first place?” asked Thomas Bradbury, a professor of psychology at the University of California at Los Angeles. “To have someone to listen to, to have a friend to share life's ups and downs. We want to try to draw attention to what's valuable in their relationship.”

Researchers are finding that these other, positive factors of relationships are potent predictors of whether couples feel committed to relationships and whether they weather storms together. As long as those factors are intact, conflicts don't drive people apart.

“What we've discovered is surprising and contrary to what most people think,” said Gottman, author of “The Mathematics of Marriage.” “Most books say it's important for couples to fight fair, but 69% of all marital conflicts never get resolved because they are about personality differences between couples. What's critical is not whether they resolve conflicts but whether they can cope with them.”

“Every couple has irreconcilable differences,” agreed Diane Sollee, founder of www.smartmarriages.com, a Web site devoted to teaching couples skills to improve their relationships. She explained such differences ought to be “managed” instead of being grounds for separations, split-ups and divorce.

Almost 90% of Americans marry at some point. An overwhelming number of those who divorce marry a second time, meaning they may have lost faith in a partner but not in the promise of the institution.

At the same time, changing social mores and expectations are stressing long-term relationships. Two-income couples juggle demanding jobs and professional advancement can sometimes detract from family and intimate relationships. The rising number of women in the work force has given women the economic security to leave unhappy relationships, the sexual revolution has made sex before and outside marriage common, and divorce has lost its stigma.

Nonetheless, most Americans still seek lifelong mates - and expectations from love and marriage have never been higher.

The juxtaposition of high expectations with the stress and cycles of relationships appears to be an important reason many relationships don't work, said Ted Huston, a professor of human ecology and psychology at the University of Texas at Austin, who tracked 168 couples over 13 1/2 years.

Huston found that changes in the first two years of marriage often predicted the outcome of relationships. Almost half of all divorces occur within the first seven years of marriage, according to national census data, and many of these “early exiters” report a decline in “bliss” right after marriage.

“When you look at them as newlyweds, they look like they are mutually enchanted and deeply in love and a prototype of your perfectly wed couple - they hug, kiss, say 'I love you' all the time,” he said. “Two years later, they've lost a lot of that romance. They think, 'We once had this great romance, and now we don't.’“

“People have this fairly unrealistic idea: 'I have got to have bliss, and it's got to stay or this is not going to work,'“ he said. “At some level, you don't need the bliss. The Hollywood romance may not be the prelude to a long-term happy marriage.”

Couples who were happy over the long term reported being content at the start of relationships and still contented two years later. Some told Huston, “'I wasn't sure I was in love because I didn't have the tingly feelings you are supposed to have,'“ he said. “They worried their feelings were positive but not intense.”

Pepper Schwartz, a sociology professor at the University of Washington in Seattle, said her study of 6,000 couples also revealed that couples in long-term relationships tended to have mutual respect, took pride in each other and saw themselves as equals.

“Very successful couples we studied had something besides children that was enjoyable to their relationship,” she added. “It could be travel, hospice work, working on a summer place.... Those things bring stability because they confer pleasure and identity in the way people live together. If you don't like to be together, and don't like the same friends and don't have the same hobbies, you have a problem.”

____________

Appeared in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on Feb. 17, 2002.

12 Ways To Keep Your Love Alive

John 13:1

12 WAYS TO KEEP YOUR LOVE ALIVE

===============================

1. Praise is such a great gift, and it's so easy to give. So look at the things that make your spouse and others unique and develop the habit of praising them for those special things.

2. Every painful trial is like an oyster, and there is a precious pearl-a personal benefit-in every one; every single one.

3. Don't go it alone. Welcome fresh insights of other perspectives-from extended family, friends, good marriage books, or a qualified marriage counselor.

4. In a mutually satisfying relationship, both people's needs are expressed, and they have the flexibility to give and take.

5. Honor goes hand in glove with love, a verb whose very definition is doing worthwhile things for someone who is valuable to us.

6. All our trials, great and small, can bring more of the two best things in life: love for life and love for others.

7. Oneness does not mean that one mate dominates the other or that the stronger controls the weaker.

8. Anger is our choice. We can choose to see its powerful potential for destruction and take steps to reduce it within us. Otherwise, it's and iceberg sinking our love.

9. Better understanding if the motivations and actions that grow out of our basic personalities can help us achieve personal and marital satisfaction.

10. Sharing deep feelings with each other is emotional intercourse, and it's vital to sexual satisfaction.

11. As we reach out to another, our own needs for fulfillment and love are met.

12. Give seven or more praises for every one fault-finding suggestion.

Martin Luther's Thoughts On Marriage

Proverbs 31:11

Martin Luther on marriage:

I have been very happy in my marriage, thank God. I have a faithful wife, according to Solomon: “The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her” (Proverbs 31:11). She spoils nothing for me. Ah, dear Lord God, marriage is not something natural and physical; but it is a gift of God, the sweetest, nay, the most chaste life; it is above all celibacy.

This is a true definition of marriage: Marriage is the God-appointed and legitimate union of man and woman in the hope of having children or at least for the purpose of avoiding fornication and sin and living to the glory of God.

Note that when … natural reason (whom the heathen have followed when they wanted to be very wise), looks at married life, she turns up her nose and says: “Ah, should I rock the baby, wash diapers, make the bed, smell foul odors, watch through the night, wait upon the bawling youngster and heal its infected sores, then take care of the wife, support her by working, tend to this, tend to that, do this, do that, suffer this, suffer that, and put up with whatever additional displeasure and trouble married life brings? Should I be so imprisoned?”

I would not want to exchange my Kate for France nor for Venice to boot; to begin with (1) because God has given her to me and me to her; (2) because I often find out that there are more shortcomings in other women than in my Kate; and although she, of course, has some too, these are nonetheless offset by far greater virtues; (3) because she keeps faith and honor in our marriage relation.

Marriage is most suitable between equals. An old man and a young girl do not fit well together. But, of course, in such a case riches can do something. A certain old man who had become engaged boastfully showed all his wealth to his fiancée. An agreeable servant always remarked: “My dear young lady, he has much more of this.” Finally, when a coughing spell plagued the old man, the servant also said: “He has much more of this....”

Whoever intends to enter married life should do so in faith and in God’s name. He should pray God that it may prosper according to his will and that marriage may not be treated as a matter of fun and folly. It is a hazardous matter and as serious as anything on earth can be. Therefore we should not rush into it as the world does, in keeping with its frivolousness and wantonness and in pursuit of its pleasure; but before taking this step we should consult God, so that we may lead our married life to his glory.

It is no small gift from God to find a wife who is pious and easy to get along with.

It is the highest grace of God when love continues to flourish in married life. The first love is ardent, is an intoxicating love, so that we are blinded and are drawn to marriage. After we have slept off our intoxication, sincere love remains in the married life of the godly; but the godless are sorry they ever married.

Married folk are not to act as they now usually do. The men are almost lions in their homes, hard toward their wives and servants. The women, too, everywhere want to domineer and have their husbands as servants. It is foolish for a man to want to demonstrate his masculine power and heroic strength by ruling over his wife. On the other hand, the ambition of wives to dominate the home is also intolerable.

t is impossible to keep peace between man and woman in family life if they do not condone and overlook each other’s faults but watch everything to the smallest point. For who does not at times offend? Thus many things must be overlooked; very many things must be ignored that a peaceful relation may exist

The love toward one’s spouse burns like a fire and seeks nothing but the person of the spouse. It says: I do not desire what is yours; I desire neither silver nor gold, neither this nor that; I desire you yourself; I want you entirely or not at all. All other love seeks something else than the person of the loved one.

[sidebar quote]: The world says of marriage: A short joy and a long displeasure. But he who understands it finds in it delight, love, and joy without ceasing.

________

"Christian History Sampler," 1990-2007 {?), Salvation Army History edition. Excerpted from "What Luther Says: A Practical In-Home Anthology for the Active Christian," compiled by Ewald M. Plass (St. Louis, Concordia, 1959).

from (see note at bottom) · Submitted by Pastor Garth Hutchinson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database romance

How To Stay Married 80 Years

On June 1, 2005, Percy and Florence Arrowsmith celebrated their 80th wedding anniversary -- and were certified by the Guinness Book of World Records as the longest-married living couple. They also held the title for “oldest married couple's aggregate age” at a combined 205 years. On celebrating their 80th, they told reporters the secret to a long marriage is to never go to sleep with an unresolved argument, and to kiss before going to bed. Plus, Flo added, hold hands while drifting off to sleep. The couple has three children, six grandchildren and nine great-grandchildren. Percy died June 15 at home in Hereford, England, with Flo by his side, no doubt holding his hand. He was 105.

Building Up A Tolerance To Love

“Recent research indicates that, in part at least, what we call `falling in love’ can be attributed to the presence in the body of a drug called `phenyl-thylamine,’ that is a form of natural amphetamine. The problem is...we build up a tolerance for this chemical in about two to four years.”

________

Dr. William Dooley and Dr. Clark Riley

from Internet Sermon · John Ewing Roberts via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database romancemarriagelust

Famous Marriages 'Breathe Life' For Couples

Luke 20:34

In 1523, Martin Luther found himself the matchmaker for 12 nuns who had escaped in pickle barrels from a Roman Catholic nunnery near Wittenberg, Germany. He secured husbands for 11, but the 12th, Katharina von Bora, rebuffed two potential husbands. Her heart was set on the great Reformer.

Finally Luther married her in 1525 for strikingly unromantic reasons: to provide his father with grandchildren and to spite the pope by breaking the vow of celibacy he had taken as a Catholic monk. Though it didn’t seem like the makings of a storybook romance, Luther’s marriage to Katie, as he called her, blossomed into one of church history’s most tender unions.

Learning about famous Christian marriages, like Martin and Katie Luther’s, can “breathe life” into the marriages of believers today and “give some guys and their wives courage to get real and be honest,” radio host and marriage expert Dennis Rainey told Baptist Press.

Good marriages demonstrate how a spouse’s love can lift a Christian “out of doubt and discouragement and perhaps even losing heart,” Rainey, president and co-founder of Family Life, said. Stories of more challenging marriages can encourage believers to persevere through their own marriage struggles, he said.

“There was only one who was perfect, and He wasn’t married,” Rainey said. Being part of God’s Kingdom requires “humbling ourselves and admitting our humanity and sharing the stories of our humanity in some of its stench and ... coming clean and getting real -- because that’s where everybody is.”

In contrast with the joyful marriages of Luther, Jonathan Edwards, Charles Spurgeon and others, Methodist movement founder John Wesley and revivalist George Whitefield struggled in their marriages. Wesley made his wife agree that she would not ask him to lighten his schedule of itinerant preaching. The couple eventually separated and she was dead for three days before he found out.

Whitefield once left his wife Elizabeth in America while he returned to England by boat without telling her. One of Whitefield’s protégés said the great revivalist viewed his marriage as a “distraction” and when Elizabeth died, “his mind was put at great liberty.”

“Uncommon unions”

The Luthers’ home was “joyful” and “playful,” Michael Haykin, professor of church history and biblical spirituality at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, told Baptist Press.

“Luther had a deep sense of the joyfulness of the Christian life, and marriage simply exacerbated that,” said Haykin, who has compiled “The Christian Lover,” a book of love letters written by famous Christians.

Though Luther refused to back down in arguments with the pope and fellow Protestant Reformer Ulrich Zwingli, he often yielded to Katie’s opinions and preferences, Haykin said. Among the ways he deferred to her was changing his custom of bathing only once a year -- a common practice in the 1500s -- because “she would not have it so,” according to one of Luther’s letters.

Since the Luthers raised pigs, Martin playfully referred to Katie by such titles as “high mistress of the Wittenberg pig sty,” Haykin said.

Fellow Reformer John Calvin “epitomizes the Protestant rediscovery of marriage,” Haykin said, referencing the Reformation critique of Roman Catholic celibacy vows.

At age 29, Calvin was driven out of Geneva, Switzerland, and settled in Strasbourg, on the border of modern-day Germany and France, where Protestant leader Martin Bucer attempted to find a wife for him. Bucer and other early Protestants believed that a pastor like Calvin should be an expert on family, and ideally be married himself.

The first three or four potential wives proved unsuitable, including one who spoke only German -- a poor match for Calvin who spoke French and didn’t know German. Calvin wrote that he would never marry her “unless the Lord had entirely bereft me of my wits.” Eventually he met and married on his own Idelette de Bure, the widow of an Anabaptist he had known in Geneva.

They were married only eight and a half years before her death; they had experienced two or three pregnancies, though none of their children lived to be more than three days old. Calvin didn’t mention Idelette much in correspondence or sermons, but several surviving letters reveal the depth of their love.

In 1541 a plague raged through Strasbourg, so Calvin sent his wife away for her safety. He wrote to a friend that “day and night my wife has been constantly in my thoughts, in need of advice now that she is separated from her husband.”

When Idelette died in 1549, Calvin wrote, “Mine is no common source of grief. I have been bereaved of the best companion of my life, of one who, had it been so ordered, would not only have been the willing sharer of my indigence, but even of my death. During her life she was the faithful helper of my ministry. From her I never experienced the slightest hindrance. She was never troublesome to me throughout the entire course of her illness; she was more anxious about her children [from her first marriage] than about herself.”

The marriage of Jonathan and Sarah Edwards was “a passionate love story,” Haykin said, noting that Edwards was among the Puritans in England and North America who, among other notable practices, broke from the longstanding tradition of arranged marriages. “The whole idea of falling in love and then getting married is very much rooted in the Puritans,” Haykin said.

Edwards met Sarah when he was 20 and she was 13. She was six feet tall and “striking in terms of her physical beauty,” Haykin said, but “what caught his eye was her spirituality” and love for God. They married in 1727 with Sarah wearing green, which Edwards believed was God’s favorite color.

The mother of 11 children, Sarah was a “fabulous home economist” and Edwards “relied upon her enormously,” Haykin said. On one occasion when Sarah was away from home to attend a funeral, Edwards wrote a letter asking her to “please come home” because “things are falling apart here.”

When Whitefield stayed in the Edwards’ home for five days in 1740, he wrote that he had not seen a “sweeter couple” and began praying that God would provide him with a wife like Sarah.

Among Edwards’ last acts before he died was to give his daughter Lucy a message for Sarah: “Give my kindest love to my dear wife, and tell her that the uncommon union, which has so long subsisted between us, has been of such a nature as I trust is spiritual and therefore will continue forever.”

Charles and Susannah Spurgeon represent another strong marriage from church history, though she had a “very poor first impression” of the great Baptist preacher, Haykin said. The Spurgeons met when he preached for the first time at the London church that came to be known as the Metropolitan Tabernacle.

“He was sweating profusely ... and he pulled out this huge handkerchief with polka dots on it,” Haykin said. “And she thought, ‘What kind of country yokel have the deacons brought in to preach?’” But soon they were married.

Among other strong marriages in church history were Martyn and Bethan Lloyd-Jones, B.B. and Annie Warfield and Francis and Edith Schaeffer.

Challenging marriages

Not all famous Christians, however, enjoyed vibrant marriages. C.T. Studd, a legendary missionary and author of the poem “Only One Life, ‘Twill Soon Be Past,” went to China for some 15 years without his wife Priscilla, Haykin said. Then he returned home only briefly before going to the Congo without her.

Studd “is often held up as a model of total commitment to Christ,” Haykin said. “I have problems with him in my mind because of his marriage.”

Foreshadowing his own marriage troubles, John Wesley once tried to convince his brother Charles that marriage interfered with commitment to Christ. The week before Charles was to be married with John officiating, the brothers began a journey to the wedding site that should have taken two days. But John scheduled so many preaching engagements along the way that they barely arrived in time for the wedding.

“Charles, in his diary, was absolutely furious at his brother,” Haykin said. John “was giving his brother an object lesson ... that preaching the Gospel is more important than marriage.”

When John married two years later, he made sure his wife Molly never interfered with his preaching -- with disastrous results. Molly traveled with him for a year. But after “tramping around the British countryside, sleeping under hedgerows, eating half-cooked meals, she told him she was settling down in London,” Haykin said. “Their marriage then began to disintegrate.”

John and Molly experienced ongoing tension over letters he exchanged with other women. She publicly accused him of infidelity at least once, though no evidence exists to substantiate the charges, and monitored his mail before they separated.

Although Whitefield prayed for a wife like Sarah Edwards, when he married, he was far less considerate as a husband than Jonathan Edwards. Whitefield once wrote that he was “not one of those lovers who is swooning for love at his beloved.”

Haykin said Whitefield demonstrated a consistent “lack of husbandly care of his wife.”

Lessons

Though some may overlook the marriage difficulties of well-known Christians because of their spiritual impact, Haykin sees the matter differently.

“If their marriages would have been solid, I think of how much better their ministries might have been,” he said.

With Wesley, for example, “we don’t see” the impact of his marriage failures “at this distance, and people may not have seen it even in his own day,” Haykin said. “But inevitably it would have had a kickback on ministry. How can he go out to preach the love of God to a crowd and he’s just had a row with his wife? Surely it had some sort of spiritual impact.”

On a positive note, Rainey of Family Life said ministers like Wesley and Whitefield illustrate that God still uses people who don’t “have it all together.”

“I think one of the big fallacies of being in ministry is the lie ... that you have to have it all together in order to preach the Gospel,” Rainey said. People are “desperate” for “authentic human beings who are like them, who fail and then get back up and ask for forgiveness from God and their spouse, or their child, and make things right and keep going.”

But Rainey and Haykin agreed that preachers must have godly marriages.

“Marriage is a reflection of the love of God for His people and for His church,” Haykin said. “ ... Therefore, a Christian pastor who is representing God, speaking God’s Word to His people, if he is married, needs to have a solid marriage.”

________

David Roach is chief national correspondent for Baptist Press, the Southern Baptist Convention’s news service.

Song of Solomon: A Picture of Marriage and Christ

Revelation 1

It’s probably the most popular love story ever written, but its portrayal of marital intimacy has generated no small amount of controversy.

Some Jews forbade men from reading it before age 30. John Calvin once had a man expelled from Geneva in part because of the way he interpreted it. And former Seattle pastor Mark Driscoll drew sharp criticism for using it to describe specific sexual acts.

Should Christians remain above the fray and avoid reading such a provocative love story? No, because it’s in the Bible, it’s inspired by God, and it gives insight into one of Israel’s most significant kings, Baptist seminary professors say.

It’s the Song of Solomon.

“I believe that by teaching our churches the principles of this book, we’ll have stronger marriages, we’ll have parents being more accountable for their children in the teenage years and we’ll have more people waiting to engage in sexual relationships in marriage,” Archie England, professor of Old Testament and Hebrew at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, told Baptist Press.

Solomon’s song?

The first of many mysteries associated with Song of Solomon, also known as Song of Songs, relates to its opening verse: “The Song of Songs, which is Solomon’s.” Bible scholars have long asked whether this means it is by, for or about Solomon, with theological conservatives divided in their answers.

One common view is that King Solomon wrote the book as a young man about an early romance before polygamy with pagan women turned his heart away from God. But some scholars note grammar and vocabulary in the book that seem to reflect a date following Israel’s return from exile in 537 B.C. Still others believe the book was written in Solomon’s time but by someone other than Solomon.

Scholars also are divided on whether to interpret Song of Solomon as a continuous story about one couple or as an assortment of loosely related love songs. During the past century, some have even proposed that the book is a narrative with three main characters rather than two, but England believes that is unlikely.

Regardless of whether the book is one story or several vignettes, it obviously extols the virtue of married love, England said.

Song of Solomon “is probably best described as having been written by somebody who is married now and is so thrilled at the joys of marital bliss,” England said. “Without caution, he’s writing about pursuing the lover, chasing the lover, protecting the lover, discovering the lover, and then all this comes to consummation.”

Perhaps the greatest disagreement associated with Song of Solomon is whether to interpret it as a literal love story or as symbolic of God’s love for His people -- or both.

“The mainstream of the Christian tradition -- be it patristic, medieval, Reformation or the broadly orthodox Protestant tradition down to Spurgeon -- would have allegorized the book in terms of Christ and His church,” Michael Haykin, professor of church history and biblical spirituality at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, told BP. “It’s in the 20th century particularly that you start to find the interpretation of the book leaning toward it being a love song.”

Modern interpreters distinguish between interpreting the book as an allegory, in which even minute details are said to represent aspects of Christian doctrine, and typology, a theological term that describes the practice of interpreting Old Testament persons, objects and practices as generally prefiguring New Testament realities. In typology, not all details of the story are viewed as symbolic.

The “book of romance”?

Beginning sometime after Israel’s return from exile in Babylon, Jews started reading Song of Solomon annually at Passover, viewing it as an illustration of God’s love for Israel. Many contemporary Jews continue this tradition.

By the second or third century A.D., Christians saw Song of Solomon as an allegory. For example, medieval theologian Bernard of Clairvaux saw Chapter 1’s reference to kisses as an allusion to the gift of the Holy Spirit. Eighteenth-century Baptist John Gill regarded a mention of the shulamite’s breasts as symbolic of the Old and New Testaments.

Furthering the symbolic interpretation, section headings in the 1611 King James Bible assumed Song of Solomon pointed to Christ and the church. Headings such as “the church’s love unto Christ” for Chapter 1 and “Christ awaketh the church with His calling” for Chapter 5 persisted in King James Bibles until at least the 1960s.

When Calvin helped expel a foe named Castellio from Geneva in the 1500s, one of the reformer’s complaints was that Castellio interpreted Song of Solomon as a literal love poem.

The pendulum swung by the mid-20th century though, when Tim and Beverly LaHaye began to present the book as “a love manual for married couples,” Haykin said. Seeing Song of Solomon as providing practical instruction in marriage continued with the publication of Tommy Nelson’s popular “The Book of Romance” in 1998 and Daniel Akin’s “God on Sex” in 2003.

Two levels of meaning?

While Haykin believes it is an error to read Song of Solomon as an allegory, he argued that discounting the church’s historic interpretation of the book is a form of “chronological snobbery.”

“We should never lightly discount a received exegetical tradition that has such longstanding consensus,” Haykin said. “It may be wrong. But I’m hesitant to say that as widely diverse figures as Origen, Cyprian, Ambrose, Augustine, Bernard of Clairvaux, Calvin, Andrew Fuller and C.H. Spurgeon are all wrong on this.”

Haykin views Song of Solomon as both describing the relationship between a husband and wife -- although he is “deeply opposed” to seeing it “as a sex manual” -- and picturing the relationship between Christ and His church. Haykin labels his approach to the book typology.

Akin, president of Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, takes a similar approach. But he hasn’t always.

In his book God on Sex, Akin interpreted Song of Solomon almost exclusively as a book about married love. Yet as he prepared to write “Exalting Jesus in Song of Songs,” Akin concluded that the book should be interpreted on two levels.

Solomon, whom Akin believes wrote the book, “is giving us a picture of what marriage was intended by God to be,” Akin told BP. “ ... But I also think the book is anticipating the ultimate relationship between a bride and a bridegroom that is fulfilled in Christ and His church.”

Like Haykin, Akin objects to interpreting the book as an allegory, preferring to label it typology. In “Exalting Jesus in Song of Songs,” Akin includes a section in each chapter about how the passage under consideration points to Christ.

Of particular note, the description of Solomon in chapter 5 bears striking resemblance to the description of Jesus in Revelation 1, Akin said. He added that both Revelation and Song of Solomon end with a call by the bride for her groom to come.

Song of Solomon’s depiction of Solomon as a “shepherd king” would have caused its original Hebrew readers to ask, “Will we ever actually see such a shepherd king on the pages of history love a bride in this kind of a way?” Akin said. “Of course the answer is, yes we do -- in Christ.”

Enriching marriages

Song of Solomon also has practical application to marriage, Akin said. Two important lessons from the book are that Christians should communicate well with their spouses and that they should praise their spouses with specific compliments.

The couple in Song of Solomon is “very quick to extol the good things that they see in their mate,” Akin said. “In other words, they major on the good things, not the bad things. The glass really is half full.”

Song of Solomon “is a book about sex,” Akin said. But “what takes place outside the bedroom is very, very important to what takes place inside the bedroom. If you’ve got a happy couple outside the bedroom, you’re going to have a very happy couple inside the bedroom.”

Breaking Up Is Really Hard (on You?)

Breaking up is not only hard to do, but a romantic split may also be especially hard to handle and possibly trigger a bout of depression.

A new study shows romantic breakups can literally add insult to injury by piling humiliation on top of loss, dramatically increasing the risk of depression.

In the largest study to date to rate the role that stressful life events play in triggering depression, anxiety, or a combination of both, researchers found the risk of depression doubled in months when an episode of humiliation occurred along with a serious loss.

“For example, if your marriage breaks up, that's a loss, and it's reasonable to expect that you will experience aspects of grief, including sadness and loss of appetite,” says researcher Kenneth S. Kendler, MD, professor of psychiatry at Virginia Commonwealth University, in a news release.

“If your marriage breaks up and your husband moves into a house a few doors away with a woman half his age, and he shows off his new girlfriend to your friends and family -- that's grief combined with humiliation. Most cases of combined loss and humiliation involved romantic breakups.”

RATING DEPRESSION RISKS

Using a five-point scale, researchers rated the impact of various stressful life events based on interviews with a group of 7,322 male and female twins that were divided into four broad categories:

• Humiliation (such as a breakup sparked by infidelity)

• Entrapment (an event that makes a person feel trapped in a bad or

worsening situation)

• Loss (death of a loved one)

• Danger (fear that a traumatic event will occur)

They then matched the event ratings against episodes of depression, anxiety, and mixed depression/anxiety reported by the participants in the previous year.

The study found the risk of depression or mixed anxiety/depression was significantly higher in months in which there were high ratings for both loss and humiliation, especially if a romantic breakup was involved.

For example, the risk of depression in a month in which there was a breakup that was initiated by the other person or prompted by an infidelity or violence was about 22% compared with a 10% risk of depression in a month when a loved one died but no humiliation occurred.

“Love can make our life wonderful, but it also can make us miserable,” says Kendler.

Other findings of the study, which appears in the Archives of General Psychiatry, include:

• An episode of anxiety was much more likely to occur in the month following a month with high scores for loss and danger.

• High ratings of entrapment, in contrast, were only predictive of mixed bouts of depression and anxiety within the month that the event occurred.

Although the effects of loss and humiliation in increasing the risk of depression were limited to the month in which the events occurred, the impact of danger on the risk of triggering mental illness was more prolonged.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SOURCES: Archives of General Psychiatry, August 2003. News release, Virginia Commonwealth University. Reviewed By Brunilda Nazario, MD

© 2003 WebMD Inc. All rights reserved.

*

I Love You More, In Perspective

Hallmark card a wife gives to her husband:

Outside: "I love you more today than yesterday!"

Inside: "Yesterday you really got on my nerves."

from New Yorker Magazine, Article: Card Tricks · David Owen via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database loverelationshipsromance

How To Stay Married 80 Years

On June 1, 2005, Percy and Florence Arrowsmith celebrated their 80th wedding anniversary -- and were certified by the Guinness Book of World Records as the longest-married living couple. They also held the title for “oldest married couple's aggregate age” at a combined 205 years. On celebrating their 80th, they told reporters the secret to a long marriage is to never go to sleep with an unresolved argument, and to kiss before going to bed. Plus, Flo added, hold hands while drifting off to sleep. The couple has three children, six grandchildren and nine great-grandchildren. Percy died June 15 at home in Hereford, England, with Flo by his side, no doubt holding his hand. He was 105.

The Science of Healthy Romantic Relationships

William Chopik is an associate professor of social personality psychology at Michigan State University, and studies how people in relationships evolve over time. He seeks a scientifically approved approach to healthy romantic relationships and finds it in the investment model, based on three key factors. “One is if you are satisfied: do you like your relationship? The next is investment: have you put a lot into the relationship; have you been dating for 10 years; do you have kids together; do you have joint bank accounts? And finally there is quality of alternatives: do you have other options or think you could jump ship to someone better?”

The investment method isn’t “super romantic”, Chopik jokes. But another scientific theory called “perceived partner responsiveness” has been described as the “bedrock” of intimacy by experts. The concept “boils down to the fact that you feel listened to or understood, and that someone is looking out for you.” Rather than someone buying you gifts, but being a lousy listener, it states that being receptive to what your partner needs at any given moment is the key to relationship health.

I’m shocked by how simple the science is: find someone you like, commit to them and make sure they want to support you.

Do we overcomplicate love? “There’s no money in that, though,” Chopik says.

________

Adapted from the article "How ‘love languages’ has been helping couples for 30 years," by Ruchira Sharma.

Marriage As Therapy Or Covenant?

Last week, another prominent couple made headlines by announcing the end of their marriage. It was former vice president Al Gore and his wife. I know both of them and always thought they were a perfect couple.

I am disappointed for them and saddened. Indeed, that seems to be the overwhelming reaction from the public and the media. Many, who saw the Gores as an ideal, loving couple who enjoyed and endured the ups and downs of public life together, wondered aloud if the Gore’s couldn’t keep going after 40 years, who can?

Well, that depends, as does so much, on your worldview.

And a perfect case in point is an article from last Friday’s New York Times entitled, “What Brain Scans Tell Us About Marriage.”

Author Tara Parker-Pope reported on recent research into the neuroscience of happy marriages. She cites one study in which 17 madly-in-love couples underwent a brain scan. When an individual was shown a picture of his or her spouse — ta-da! — the scan showed activity in that part of the brain associated with romance. In older couples, Parker-Pope writes, “researchers spotted something extra: parts of the brain associated with deep attachment were also activated.”

The researcher, Dr. Bianca Acevedo explained, “They have the feelings of euphoria, but also the feelings of calm and security that we feel when we’re attached to somebody.”

Dr Acevedo added, “I think it’s wonderful news.”

And I do, too. Parker-Pope, after highlighting the key to a happy marriage, asks two questions that highlighted for me exactly why marriages today are crumbling. One, “how much does your partner provide a source of exciting experiences?” And two, “how much has knowing your partner made you a better person?”

What do these two questions have in common? They are the epitome of the postmodern, therapeutic worldview — the worldview that asks one and only one question: What’s In It For Me?

Thus Parker-Pope can end her article on a happy postmodern note, quoting a Wharton School Economist: The Gores “had 40 years of marriage ... The fact that they both can look forward and see a promising future by not being married [is] a celebration about how much optimism they have for the rest of their lives.”

Well, I cannot put such a happy face on divorce, nor do I mean to single out the Gores for criticism. Far from it, because I know all too well the pain divorce creates.

But I can’t stop from noticing how far our culture has drifted from the faith that founded it. Even 40 years ago, marriage was seen as a covenant, a sacrament in some traditions — a promise before God between a man and a woman to be faithful to one another until death did them part. Not seeking the good for one’s self, but the good of the other.

But in our therapeutic culture, as Parker-Pope’s questions illuminate so brilliantly, this has been turned 180 degrees. Marriage is now just another path, or obstacle, to self-fulfillment.

Please don’t tell me worldviews don’t matter. Or that they can’t shape a culture. We’ve gone in 40 years from the Christian belief in a lifelong commitment to seeing divorce as the start of a promising future. Please.

________

Copyright (c) 2010 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

Famous Marriages 'Breathe Life' For Couples

Luke 20:34

In 1523, Martin Luther found himself the matchmaker for 12 nuns who had escaped in pickle barrels from a Roman Catholic nunnery near Wittenberg, Germany. He secured husbands for 11, but the 12th, Katharina von Bora, rebuffed two potential husbands. Her heart was set on the great Reformer.

Finally Luther married her in 1525 for strikingly unromantic reasons: to provide his father with grandchildren and to spite the pope by breaking the vow of celibacy he had taken as a Catholic monk. Though it didn’t seem like the makings of a storybook romance, Luther’s marriage to Katie, as he called her, blossomed into one of church history’s most tender unions.

Learning about famous Christian marriages, like Martin and Katie Luther’s, can “breathe life” into the marriages of believers today and “give some guys and their wives courage to get real and be honest,” radio host and marriage expert Dennis Rainey told Baptist Press.

Good marriages demonstrate how a spouse’s love can lift a Christian “out of doubt and discouragement and perhaps even losing heart,” Rainey, president and co-founder of Family Life, said. Stories of more challenging marriages can encourage believers to persevere through their own marriage struggles, he said.

“There was only one who was perfect, and He wasn’t married,” Rainey said. Being part of God’s Kingdom requires “humbling ourselves and admitting our humanity and sharing the stories of our humanity in some of its stench and ... coming clean and getting real -- because that’s where everybody is.”

In contrast with the joyful marriages of Luther, Jonathan Edwards, Charles Spurgeon and others, Methodist movement founder John Wesley and revivalist George Whitefield struggled in their marriages. Wesley made his wife agree that she would not ask him to lighten his schedule of itinerant preaching. The couple eventually separated and she was dead for three days before he found out.

Whitefield once left his wife Elizabeth in America while he returned to England by boat without telling her. One of Whitefield’s protégés said the great revivalist viewed his marriage as a “distraction” and when Elizabeth died, “his mind was put at great liberty.”

“Uncommon unions”

The Luthers’ home was “joyful” and “playful,” Michael Haykin, professor of church history and biblical spirituality at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, told Baptist Press.

“Luther had a deep sense of the joyfulness of the Christian life, and marriage simply exacerbated that,” said Haykin, who has compiled “The Christian Lover,” a book of love letters written by famous Christians.

Though Luther refused to back down in arguments with the pope and fellow Protestant Reformer Ulrich Zwingli, he often yielded to Katie’s opinions and preferences, Haykin said. Among the ways he deferred to her was changing his custom of bathing only once a year -- a common practice in the 1500s -- because “she would not have it so,” according to one of Luther’s letters.

Since the Luthers raised pigs, Martin playfully referred to Katie by such titles as “high mistress of the Wittenberg pig sty,” Haykin said.

Fellow Reformer John Calvin “epitomizes the Protestant rediscovery of marriage,” Haykin said, referencing the Reformation critique of Roman Catholic celibacy vows.

At age 29, Calvin was driven out of Geneva, Switzerland, and settled in Strasbourg, on the border of modern-day Germany and France, where Protestant leader Martin Bucer attempted to find a wife for him. Bucer and other early Protestants believed that a pastor like Calvin should be an expert on family, and ideally be married himself.

The first three or four potential wives proved unsuitable, including one who spoke only German -- a poor match for Calvin who spoke French and didn’t know German. Calvin wrote that he would never marry her “unless the Lord had entirely bereft me of my wits.” Eventually he met and married on his own Idelette de Bure, the widow of an Anabaptist he had known in Geneva.

They were married only eight and a half years before her death; they had experienced two or three pregnancies, though none of their children lived to be more than three days old. Calvin didn’t mention Idelette much in correspondence or sermons, but several surviving letters reveal the depth of their love.

In 1541 a plague raged through Strasbourg, so Calvin sent his wife away for her safety. He wrote to a friend that “day and night my wife has been constantly in my thoughts, in need of advice now that she is separated from her husband.”

When Idelette died in 1549, Calvin wrote, “Mine is no common source of grief. I have been bereaved of the best companion of my life, of one who, had it been so ordered, would not only have been the willing sharer of my indigence, but even of my death. During her life she was the faithful helper of my ministry. From her I never experienced the slightest hindrance. She was never troublesome to me throughout the entire course of her illness; she was more anxious about her children [from her first marriage] than about herself.”

The marriage of Jonathan and Sarah Edwards was “a passionate love story,” Haykin said, noting that Edwards was among the Puritans in England and North America who, among other notable practices, broke from the longstanding tradition of arranged marriages. “The whole idea of falling in love and then getting married is very much rooted in the Puritans,” Haykin said.

Edwards met Sarah when he was 20 and she was 13. She was six feet tall and “striking in terms of her physical beauty,” Haykin said, but “what caught his eye was her spirituality” and love for God. They married in 1727 with Sarah wearing green, which Edwards believed was God’s favorite color.

The mother of 11 children, Sarah was a “fabulous home economist” and Edwards “relied upon her enormously,” Haykin said. On one occasion when Sarah was away from home to attend a funeral, Edwards wrote a letter asking her to “please come home” because “things are falling apart here.”

When Whitefield stayed in the Edwards’ home for five days in 1740, he wrote that he had not seen a “sweeter couple” and began praying that God would provide him with a wife like Sarah.

Among Edwards’ last acts before he died was to give his daughter Lucy a message for Sarah: “Give my kindest love to my dear wife, and tell her that the uncommon union, which has so long subsisted between us, has been of such a nature as I trust is spiritual and therefore will continue forever.”

Charles and Susannah Spurgeon represent another strong marriage from church history, though she had a “very poor first impression” of the great Baptist preacher, Haykin said. The Spurgeons met when he preached for the first time at the London church that came to be known as the Metropolitan Tabernacle.

“He was sweating profusely ... and he pulled out this huge handkerchief with polka dots on it,” Haykin said. “And she thought, ‘What kind of country yokel have the deacons brought in to preach?’” But soon they were married.

Among other strong marriages in church history were Martyn and Bethan Lloyd-Jones, B.B. and Annie Warfield and Francis and Edith Schaeffer.

Challenging marriages

Not all famous Christians, however, enjoyed vibrant marriages. C.T. Studd, a legendary missionary and author of the poem “Only One Life, ‘Twill Soon Be Past,” went to China for some 15 years without his wife Priscilla, Haykin said. Then he returned home only briefly before going to the Congo without her.

Studd “is often held up as a model of total commitment to Christ,” Haykin said. “I have problems with him in my mind because of his marriage.”

Foreshadowing his own marriage troubles, John Wesley once tried to convince his brother Charles that marriage interfered with commitment to Christ. The week before Charles was to be married with John officiating, the brothers began a journey to the wedding site that should have taken two days. But John scheduled so many preaching engagements along the way that they barely arrived in time for the wedding.

“Charles, in his diary, was absolutely furious at his brother,” Haykin said. John “was giving his brother an object lesson ... that preaching the Gospel is more important than marriage.”

When John married two years later, he made sure his wife Molly never interfered with his preaching -- with disastrous results. Molly traveled with him for a year. But after “tramping around the British countryside, sleeping under hedgerows, eating half-cooked meals, she told him she was settling down in London,” Haykin said. “Their marriage then began to disintegrate.”

John and Molly experienced ongoing tension over letters he exchanged with other women. She publicly accused him of infidelity at least once, though no evidence exists to substantiate the charges, and monitored his mail before they separated.

Although Whitefield prayed for a wife like Sarah Edwards, when he married, he was far less considerate as a husband than Jonathan Edwards. Whitefield once wrote that he was “not one of those lovers who is swooning for love at his beloved.”

Haykin said Whitefield demonstrated a consistent “lack of husbandly care of his wife.”

Lessons

Though some may overlook the marriage difficulties of well-known Christians because of their spiritual impact, Haykin sees the matter differently.

“If their marriages would have been solid, I think of how much better their ministries might have been,” he said.

With Wesley, for example, “we don’t see” the impact of his marriage failures “at this distance, and people may not have seen it even in his own day,” Haykin said. “But inevitably it would have had a kickback on ministry. How can he go out to preach the love of God to a crowd and he’s just had a row with his wife? Surely it had some sort of spiritual impact.”

On a positive note, Rainey of Family Life said ministers like Wesley and Whitefield illustrate that God still uses people who don’t “have it all together.”

“I think one of the big fallacies of being in ministry is the lie ... that you have to have it all together in order to preach the Gospel,” Rainey said. People are “desperate” for “authentic human beings who are like them, who fail and then get back up and ask for forgiveness from God and their spouse, or their child, and make things right and keep going.”

But Rainey and Haykin agreed that preachers must have godly marriages.

“Marriage is a reflection of the love of God for His people and for His church,” Haykin said. “ ... Therefore, a Christian pastor who is representing God, speaking God’s Word to His people, if he is married, needs to have a solid marriage.”

________

David Roach is chief national correspondent for Baptist Press, the Southern Baptist Convention’s news service.

Marriage As Therapy Or Covenant?

Last week, another prominent couple made headlines by announcing the end of their marriage. It was former vice president Al Gore and his wife. I know both of them and always thought they were a perfect couple.

I am disappointed for them and saddened. Indeed, that seems to be the overwhelming reaction from the public and the media. Many, who saw the Gores as an ideal, loving couple who enjoyed and endured the ups and downs of public life together, wondered aloud if the Gore’s couldn’t keep going after 40 years, who can?

Well, that depends, as does so much, on your worldview.

And a perfect case in point is an article from last Friday’s New York Times entitled, “What Brain Scans Tell Us About Marriage.”

Author Tara Parker-Pope reported on recent research into the neuroscience of happy marriages. She cites one study in which 17 madly-in-love couples underwent a brain scan. When an individual was shown a picture of his or her spouse — ta-da! — the scan showed activity in that part of the brain associated with romance. In older couples, Parker-Pope writes, “researchers spotted something extra: parts of the brain associated with deep attachment were also activated.”

The researcher, Dr. Bianca Acevedo explained, “They have the feelings of euphoria, but also the feelings of calm and security that we feel when we’re attached to somebody.”

Dr Acevedo added, “I think it’s wonderful news.”

And I do, too. Parker-Pope, after highlighting the key to a happy marriage, asks two questions that highlighted for me exactly why marriages today are crumbling. One, “how much does your partner provide a source of exciting experiences?” And two, “how much has knowing your partner made you a better person?”

What do these two questions have in common? They are the epitome of the postmodern, therapeutic worldview — the worldview that asks one and only one question: What’s In It For Me?

Thus Parker-Pope can end her article on a happy postmodern note, quoting a Wharton School Economist: The Gores “had 40 years of marriage ... The fact that they both can look forward and see a promising future by not being married [is] a celebration about how much optimism they have for the rest of their lives.”

Well, I cannot put such a happy face on divorce, nor do I mean to single out the Gores for criticism. Far from it, because I know all too well the pain divorce creates.

But I can’t stop from noticing how far our culture has drifted from the faith that founded it. Even 40 years ago, marriage was seen as a covenant, a sacrament in some traditions — a promise before God between a man and a woman to be faithful to one another until death did them part. Not seeking the good for one’s self, but the good of the other.

But in our therapeutic culture, as Parker-Pope’s questions illuminate so brilliantly, this has been turned 180 degrees. Marriage is now just another path, or obstacle, to self-fulfillment.

Please don’t tell me worldviews don’t matter. Or that they can’t shape a culture. We’ve gone in 40 years from the Christian belief in a lifelong commitment to seeing divorce as the start of a promising future. Please.

________

Copyright (c) 2010 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

How To Stay Married 80 Years

On June 1, 2005, Percy and Florence Arrowsmith celebrated their 80th wedding anniversary -- and were certified by the Guinness Book of World Records as the longest-married living couple. They also held the title for “oldest married couple's aggregate age” at a combined 205 years. On celebrating their 80th, they told reporters the secret to a long marriage is to never go to sleep with an unresolved argument, and to kiss before going to bed. Plus, Flo added, hold hands while drifting off to sleep. The couple has three children, six grandchildren and nine great-grandchildren. Percy died June 15 at home in Hereford, England, with Flo by his side, no doubt holding his hand. He was 105.

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate