Menu

127 Sermon Illustrations on Criticism

127 illustrations Page 3 of 3

Criticism in Christian preaching often highlights the tension between human judgment and divine grace, urging believers to avoid harsh fault-finding and to exercise humility and love instead (James 4:11-12). Illustrations frequently portray public figures, churches, or individuals facing unfair scrutiny, using images of trials, misunderstood efforts, and the call to respond with grace rather than retaliation.

Growing Amazing Gardens

Ephesians 4:15

Our grandson Jordan couldn't wait to tell me. His Grandma had bought a little kit for him called the "Magic Garden." Together, they put together these little plastic pieces that formed the frame for an outdoor scene that had a mountain as its backdrop. Then Grandma helped Jordan pour the liquid from the kit over the crystals that are hiding in designated areas of that frame. The next day Jordan came to our house to see what had happened to that scene. When he stopped by my office to tell me, his eyes got big and his hands were in motion to try to explain to me what he had seen - he just said, "It grow!" And he had this kind of sense of wonderment. He was right - the trees had sprouted full pink foliage overnight, colorful flowers and bushes had bloomed, and, as Jordan said, "Mountain grow snow." Well, sure enough, the mountain had filled in with a cover of snow. Last night's plain plastic frame had suddenly exploded into this fully blooming, technicolor show!

Well, I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A WORD WITH YOU today about "Growing Amazing Gardens."

That "Magic Garden" kit appears pretty plain and unimpressive at first look. But the secret is that there's all kinds of potential beauty there. Of course, you'll never see that beauty if you don't water it to make it grow! By the way - people are like that, too. Including some folks in your personal world right now. They may not look or feel like they're much - but they've got all kinds of potential for beauty ... if someone will water what needs to grow.

God gives us a hint of this life-changing chemistry in our word for today from the Word of God in Ephesians 4:15-16. He says, "Speaking the truth in love, we will in all things grow up into Him who is the Head, that is, Christ. From Him the whole body, joined and held together by every supporting ligament, grows and builds itself up in love, as each part does its work."

The "water" in this chemistry for growth is "speaking the truth in love" and things that "build up" those that we're in contact with. If we nurture the good things in people, if we love them by telling them the truth about Jesus and about who they are in Him, we can actually help people start to become more like Jesus, to start producing His spiritual characteristics.

The problem is that we often can't see past the basic "kit" in front of us. We look at our partner, our son or daughter, our mother or father, our fellow believer or co-worker, and all we can see is their "warts," their weaknesses, the things they need to improve. We're experts at seeing the flaws and areas for improvement in other people. Consequently, most of us have already had a lifetime's worth of criticism, put-downs, harshness.

But the eyes of Jesus don't just see what a person is - they see what that person could be - if someone would just water their potential with some encouragement and praise and believing in them. Jesus told Simon, "You are Simon, but you will be 'the rock.'" He saw what Simon could be - and, in fact, what He became in Jesus' amazing garden.

So, what you water will grow. People will become what you call them. And the people in your family, in your church, at the place where you work have so much beauty planted in them by our Creator. But somebody needs to believe in what they could be. So build them up - don't ever tear them down. Build their confidence, don't take it away. Load them up with praise - they don't need the growth-stunting effects of your negatives. You will be amazed at what can happen in the garden of lives around you if you will water them to bring out their latent beauty. In the words of my grandson, "They grow!"

________________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #3793 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database tongueencouragement

Are Your Shoes on the Wrong Feet?

One day a little boy complained that his new shoes were hurting his feet. I looked down at his feet. No wonder they hurt. His shoes were on the wrong feet! When I changed them he felt better and was soon the liveliest little fellow in the group.

Sometimes our lives seem all sour and stale. We find fault with everyone around us. We need to stop and take a good look at our feet.

If we were wearing the same shoes the other fellow wears, would we be happy?

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

Dwight Moody was preaching when someone passed a note to him through the usher. It had only one word: "Fool." Moody looked at it and said, "I've often received notes that weren't signed. This is the first time I've received a note that someone forgot to write, but signed."

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

The Spiritual Skeleton

An old fable tells of a man cursed with the power of seeing other human beings, not in the beauty of flesh and blood, but as skeletons gaunt and grisly. Some saints seem to have taken upon themselves this curse. Do you feel that you are the only one who is right with the Lord - that everybody else is a spiritual skeleton because he is not of the same denominational stripe or has not the same scruples of conscience as you? Take him or her into your circle of believers as Paul did, as long as they are calling upon the name of the Lord Jesus Christ.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Seeing What's Far, Missing What's Close

Matthew 7

I'm looking out my window right now, and I can see everything clearly. But if I need to read these notes right in front of me, I would have to put my glasses on. Now, when I'm driving down the road later today, I won't need my glasses. I've got no problem seeing the road ahead, the cars around me, that roadkill I want to avoid. But if I need to pull over and look at my map, forget it - I'd better have my glasses or I'll never find that small town I'm looking for. I am, as they say, farsighted.

Well, I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about "Seeing What's Far, Missing What's Close."

Farsighted - that means you can see what's far from you, but you've got a problem seeing what's right in front of you. It's a problem many people with perfect eyes have - when it comes to seeing the flaws and failures that are right in front of them.

Jesus talked about this spiritual farsightedness in our word for today from the Word of God. In Matthew 7, beginning with verse 1, Jesus says, "Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye, when all the time there is a plank your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye."

Well, Jesus is hitting hard at a tendency we all have - to see very clearly the mistakes and faults far away - in other people, that is - and to miss the mistakes and faults that are right in front of us - in ourselves. We are good at seeing the flaws in the person we're married to, in our children, in our parent, and being totally oblivious to the things we're doing wrong. We are quick to jump on the failings of a friend, or a coworker, or a supervisor, or a spiritual leader, and totally ignore where we're missing it.

Maybe, if you're honest with yourself, you'd have to admit that you've become a pretty critical person, quick to point out where the people around you are messing up. People feel judged, diminished, categorized, put down when they're around you. There are lots of reasons we're hard on other people. Sometimes, it's because we like to feel superior. Other times, it's because we feel inferior and we're trying to feel better at their expense. This "attacking the speck, missing the plank" thing can be because we tend to look for someone to blame ... because we want to excuse our failings by pointing out theirs ... because we actually see in them something that bugs us about ourselves.

Whatever the reason, Jesus really doesn't like it. He calls us to self-examination, to cleaning up your own yard, and to attacking the garbage in us. Yes, there will be times when God will use you to hold up a mirror for someone and help them deal with an issue. But because we're so aware of our own sinfulness, our own failings, we'll do it with humility, not arrogance - with gentleness, not harshness - reluctantly, not eagerly. It may be that you can think even now of someone who's felt the hurt or condemnation of your criticism. You could both experience some wonderful healing if you would tell them you're sorry and ask for their forgiveness.

If you're spiritually farsighted - you tend to see their faults, not yours. Let God give you His glasses to see the man or woman in the mirror. Getting you to be what Jesus wants you to be should be pretty much a full-time job!

________________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. 'Practical Answers to Real Life Issues'

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #3945 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database criticism

The Opposition To Jesus

Luke 11:54

If Jesus were to do His same ministry on earth in 1999, He would be wanted by …

… the FDA for turning water into wine without a license,

… the EPA for killing fig trees,

… the AMA for practicing medicine without a license,

… the Dept. of Health for asking people to open graves, for raising the dead and for feeding 5,000 people in the wilderness,

… the NEA for teaching without a certificate,

… OSHA for walking on water without a life-jacket and for flying without an airplane,

… the SPCA for driving hogs into the sea,

… the NATIONAL BOARD of PSYCHIATRISTS for giving advice on how to live a guilt-free life,

… the INTER-FAITH MOVEMENT for condemning all other religions,

… and by the ZONING DEPT for building mansions without a permit.

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

A Cashier's Gentle Rebuke

Job 20:3

It was a Saturday afternoon, and Ray had rushed down to the local supermarket to hurriedly pick up some hamburger rolls, chips and a few condiments. The big college game was going to be on, so he was having a few friends over to watch it.

The store was loaded with shoppers and as he headed for the six item express lane, the only one that didn't have a long line, a woman completely ignoring the overhead sign slipped into the check-out line just in front of him pushing a cart piled high with groceries.

Ray was quietly fuming at the anticipated delay. But the elderly cashier beckoned the woman to come forward, looked into the cart and asked ever so sweetly, “So Dearie, which six items would you like to buy?”

A Channel of Blessing

Nehemiah 8:10

Go your way, eat … drink … and send portions unto them for whom, nothing is prepared … neither be ye sorry; for the joy of the Lord is your strength. — Nehemiah 8:10.

Instead of uselessly lamenting the impoverished state of God’s people or endeavoring to prove where the fault lay, Gideon resolved that his own soul should not be starved. He accordingly resorted to the winepress to thresh out for himself the wheat of which otherwise the Midianites would have robbed him. The story of how this pleased the Lord and led Gideon to become a channel of blessing to the people is well known. If, instead of indulging in faultfinding, we were to nourish our souls privately on the Word of God, the Lord could make us a blessing to others.

Make me a channel of blessing today,

make me a channel of blessing I pray;

My life possessing, my service blessing,

make me a channel of blessing today.

from Old Devotional Calendar (ca 1960's) · Anonymous via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database criticism

Trampling On A Masterpiece

Ephesians 4:29

I was on a mission in England and Ireland, and I actually had a day to spend in the historic English city of York. What a place! It's surrounded by a medieval wall actually and it's dominated by a cathedral that might be second only to Westminster Abbey in London. There was an unusual scene out in front, because there was an artist on his knees, painstakingly working on a chalk drawing on the sidewalk in front of the cathedral. When I was closer and I looked at it, it was the Mona Lisa. It was immediately recognizable. He must have been working on it all day, and it was beautifully done. As I went inside a restaurant, I saw that the artist had left. Within minutes, a little boy came up, and he intentionally ran over the artwork, stomped back and forth and made footprints all over it. Other kids followed him. They did the same thing. They had just trampled all over the work of an artist who had worked very hard on it. It hurts to see someone doing that.

I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about “Trampling on a Masterpiece.”

Our word for today from the Word of God comes from Ephesians 4:29-30. “Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building others up according to their needs, that it may benefit those who listen. And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God.” God is saying don't tear down somebody with your words. Don't trample them with your words. Why does it bother Him so much? Why does it grieve and break the heart of the Holy Spirit of God?

You have to go back to Ephesians 2:10. It says, “We are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works which He prepared in advance for us to do.” God is working on this unique masterpiece creation in every person. He has a job for them to do. He's trying to build them up and help them know what that job is. In a world that tears down our worth so much, He's trying to get them to believe they are the workmanship He created in Christ Jesus. No matter how difficult that person may be, or how obscured the work of God might be, God is trying to finish a work of art in someone He created. That's why it hurts Him so much when we trample on one of those masterpieces in progress.

In angry, impatient or critical moments, have you maybe left some verbal footprints on your son or daughter? Social scientists tell us that our kids need seven positives to come back to zero after they have heard just one negative. We never forget the names that we're called by a parent, or things we are accused of by a parent. I'm sure you haven't forgotten. Every time you fired careless words at your husband or your wife when you're tired, or you want to win or you want to get your way, you've been ripping a person God is trying to build.

What about the attacks that the other person doesn't even hear? Maybe damaging words have been said at work, or at church, among friends, behind their back. You're still trampling on God's work, marking them up in the eyes of others. We don't usually do trampling with our feet; we do it with our mouth. I can still visualize those footprints on that artist's skillful work in front of the cathedral. It was ugly. It's ugly when you do it to somebody else with your mouth.

Maybe it's time you did something about the footprints you have left on a masterpiece of God. Maybe it's time you go back and make it right, and make a commitment to not ever again let your mouth mark up the artwork of God.

________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #4627 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database tongue

I Would Do Nothing

Luke 6:37

One morning an excited Bostonian rushed into the office of a Dr. Everett. A local newspaper had published an article about him, he said, which severely criticized his conduct. He wanted to know if Dr. Everett thought he should demand that an apology be printed, or if he should take legal action, asking for damages.

It was a good time for the doctor to remain calm and cool. Listening quietly while his visitor raved and fumed and sputtered, he finally had a chance to give the man some counsel.

“My dear sir,” he said, “I would do nothing. Half the people who got that paper never saw the article. Half of those who read it did not understand it. Half of those who did understand it did not believe it. Half of those who believed it were of no importance anyway.”

At one time somebody told President Lincoln that Stanton, his Secretary of War, had called him a fool. Lincoln replied that it must be true, for “Stanton is usually right.”

A teacher of elocution went a long distance one night to hear Rev. Beecher deliver an address. When the sermon was finished, he pushed up to the front and said to the speaker, “Mr. Beecher, I am an elocution teacher from the State of New Jersey. I came over to hear the greatest American preacher, but I am terribly disappointed.”

“What is the matter now?” asked Beecher.

“Well, sir, I counted eighty errors in grammar in your sermon.”

“Is that all?” asked Beecher. “I would have wagered my old hat that there were over eight hundred if you hadn't told me.”

We so often get our blood pressure up over something someone is supposed to have said about us. Maybe they said it, and maybe they didn't. If they did say something about us, perhaps the report which has reached us is terribly exaggerated. Most rumors or stories, if ignored, will die a natural death in a short time. One thing is sure, our friends will not believe them.

If someone is telling the truth about us, we surely should not object to that. If it is not true, why worry about it?

________

James Wallace, Reprinted from Our Times, June 1949, source: Signs of the Times, Copyright (c) March 2005, Pacific Press, http://www.signstimes.com

*

Are You Chasing Donkeys?

1 Samuel 9:2

Chasing donkeys is a trivial pursuit. King Saul was the first notable donkey chaser. Scripture (1 Samuel 9:2) describes Saul as “an impressive young man,” with “no one more impressive among the Israelites than he.” The following verse, however, is a jarring contrast. “Take one of the attendants with you and go look for the donkeys,” his father told him.

Granted, Saul was not yet anointed king of Israel at the time, but it was ironic foreshadowing. Scripture says he was “hiding among the supplies” (1 Samuel 10:22) when it was time for his introduction by Samuel. As king, Saul spent inordinate amounts of time chasing David around the countryside trying to kill him. David recognized the indignity of it. “Who has the king of Israel come after?” David asks in 1 Samuel 24:14, “What are you chasing after? A dead dog? A flea?”

Saul was described as a man above men, kingly in appearance, friends with Samuel the great prophet. He was adorned with all the garments of royalty. He had a crown, a throne and a scepter. He had an army at his command. This man who had a date with destiny was detoured in his life chasing displaced donkeys.

Unfortunately, far too many of us in the evangelical church today are out chasing donkeys, as well.

It is much too easy to stand and take potshots at all that is wrong with churches and denominations -- to be a naysayer. Reams are written about how we aren’t doing this or that. This is not a column meant to bash all things evangelical. I pray it is a contribution to a growing cry for the church to wake up! It is an emergency call for a sense of urgency.

Two years ago I opened a series of columns with a quote by Anglican priest David Watson. Nearly 25 years ago he wrote, “It is widely held that the battle of the century will be between Marxism, Islam, and Third World Christianity. Western Christianity is considered too weak and ineffective to contribute anything significant to this universal struggle.” I commented at the time that Watson’s statement is a sobering accusation that I’ve been unable to discredit in the years since.

John Burke, pastor of Gateway Community Church in Austin, Texas, recently published a book titled, “No Perfect People Allowed: Creating a Come as You Are Culture in the Church.” Burke opens the first chapter of the book by asking what a Buddhist, a biker couple, a homosexual activist, a transient, an engineer, a Jew and a Muslim all have in common. His answer: They are the future church in America.

He says that each of these now have a relationship with Christ and are members in his church and he says, “this is the generation the church must reach if it is to survive.” He then states, “But time is running out. Unless Christians leading the church in America change, and unless the church begins living out the magnetic attractive force Jesus had on the world, the Christian Church in America will be completely marginalized within decades.”

Certain voices rise above the critical rhetoric of evaluating Western Christianity to become prophetic. I believe Watson and Burke are essentially issuing the same warning to the church. Burke’s assessment confirms Watson’s observation made 25 years earlier.

Here’s the thing that concerns me: NOT ENOUGH PEOPLE ARE LISTENING! We are a complacent and arrogant people. Isaiah is replete with examples of God humbling the haughty. Arrogance followed by judgment is a recurring theme; survey the Old Testament and confirm it for yourself. However, before dismissing those examples as ancient history, flip to Revelation and read Christ’s seven letters to the churches. More specifically, read what Jesus says to the church of Sardis: “I know your works; you have a reputation for being alive, but you are dead. Be alert and strengthen what remains, which is about to die ...” (Revelation 3:1-2).

Sobering, or at least it should be. Our response as individuals, churches and denominations should be to immediately beg God to forgive our arrogance and ask to see the world through His eyes. Then, with obedience, to then do something about what we see.

Paul cautions in Ephesians 5:15-16 to “Pay careful attention, then, to how you walk ... making the most of the time, because the days are evil.” If we are going to walk as wise men and women we must engage our world with urgent relevance. If not I fear God may ask, “Are you chasing donkeys?”

*

from Baptist Press · James T. Draper Jr. via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Approaching God's Revelation

John 7:17

Bible — Old Testament

Two Approaches to the Bible:

• Liberal: man was searching after God and the Bible is a record of this search and of the growing concept of God. Thds, this leaves the Bible as a purely human production.

• Conservative: God was searching after man, and the Bible is a record of God dealing with man. Thus, the Bible is a Divine production.

When we come to questions that we can’t answer in the Bible we should realize that this is because there are some things that we cannot know about God on account of His infinity. ‘The foolishness of God is wiser than the wisdom of men.’ Our attitude should he therefore, ‘Speak, Lord, for Thy servant heareth.’.

Revelation, though, is progressive: ie. immortality is not made clear in the old Testament but is in the new (2 Timothy 1:10). The revelation progresses as is shown in Hebrews 1:1-2.

The Bible is largely thee record of human history: people like ourselves in feelings, sins, hopes, and their relation to God. Christ came to manifest God in the flesh, not merely to teach, but more to live, God. Thus we receive truth through human personality. God gave us history which is fact, not idea — reality not mere philosophy. Intellectual philosophies fail and expire but spiritual realities remain. The writers were hump n with different styles and illustrations, yet all with one Author, the Spirit that spoke through men: 1 Peter 1:20, 2 Timothy 3:16 (but note that in practical terms these verse refer primarily to the Old Testament; yet also check also 2 Peter 3:15-16.)

To approach Scripture with a view of understanding it, we must do so as redeemed men before we can discern the spiritual truths (1 Corinthians 2:14). You can only know when you will to know and are prepared to practise (John 7:17 and John 5:39). Scriptures demand our best brains but more than that they demand our wills.

The Bible is formed of two testaments or covenants; two ways of God’s dealing with men. The old is the preparatory covenant for Christ and the new covenant.

The first five books are a unity on their own, the Pentateuch, the book of the Law. The Law was the basic relationship between God and man.

Attitudes to the Pentateuch.

• Bibical Criticism is an evaluation or assessment and means a neutral outlook. It can be either constructive or destructive.

• Higher criticism evaluates the date, source, and author. The attitude of higher crilicism is generally anti-supernatural and then is destructive.

• Lower or textual criticism evaluates the text.

For us Christ’s attitude is conclusive. He regarded the Old Testament as the Word of God, The Pentateuch as from Moses. He knew the truth of these matters for ‘I am the truth’. He maintained firmly ‘the Scriptures cenciot be broken.’ and quoted to the Devil from the ‘D’ of the critics.

from Notes On The Old Testament - Some Thoughts · Rev. E. L. Simmonds, T. B. C.; September 1960 via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database criticism

Fallen Preachers

1 Corinthians 10:12

Rev. Bruce Dunn has a preacher friend in Toronto who kept a scrapbook about wayward preachers. The news clippings and pictures about any preacher who went astray was filed in his scrapbook under the various categories of Methodist, Lutheran, Presbyterian, Baptist, Pentecostal, etc.

When someone came up to him as they often did and someone said to him that he read about some straying preacher, he would say, “Do you have a few minutes? Come into my study.” Then he would pull down his scrapbook and say, “What is your denomination?” The man would say, “Well, I’m a Methodist.” “Oh, let’s turn over to the Methodist section here.” Then he would read them about what some straying Methodist ministers had done.

The Bible says, “So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that you don't fall!” (1 Cor. 10:12).

*

Do You Want Their Honest Opinion?

Proverbs 15:22

On Wednesday, I boarded United flight #1217 headed for San Jose, California... As I was sitting down and getting ready for the take-off, they announced that United Airlines would be conducting a passenger survey. To those who participated there was a chance you could be credited with as many as 60,000 air miles. I never win anything, but I decided I would go ahead and offer my opinion.

I'm telling you, they asked you everything! How did I like the seats? Was the aircraft clean? Did the flight attendants treat us nicely? Was the food up to par? What was it like when you checked in? Were the gate agents polite? Was the ticket fairly priced? Did the United employees look neatly dressed? And the questions that really caught my attention: Would you fly on United again? Would you recommend United to someone else?

Now I am sure you can see where I am going with this. What if, at least once a month, you put a survey into the hands of your church attendees and asked them to express their honest opinion about your church, the services and maybe even the content of your sermons? I don't know about you, but I'm pretty sure I am not that secure.

Let's consider a few simple questions: Were you greeted and made to feel welcome when you arrived? Did the music point you to the preached Word or was it simply one song after another? Did the message have relevance? Did it apply? Were your children well cared for? Was the Lord's house honored with neatness and order? Did you feel the church service was performance-oriented or Christ-centered? And the big questions: Will you return? Would you invite someone else to attend with you?

I know churches are not airplanes, but sometimes it is good to know how your people are feeling. Don't you agree? 'Plans fail for lack of counsel, but with many advisers they succeed' (Proverbs 15:22).

________

H. B. London, Pastors Weekly Briefing newsletter, http://www.family.org/pastor/, January 20, 2006; secondary source: Preaching Now

*

The God Who Hears

Psalms 56

I have a friend who teaches special education at an elementary school. She has encountered a problem common to any classroom or family in which there is more than one child: the children want to constantly tattle on each other. As humans, we are far more sensitive and cognizant of the wrongdoing of others than we are of our own. And children who may bend the rules for themselves and press every boundary laid for them often want their peers to be strictly judged by the letter of the law.

To cut down on tattling, my friend devised an ingenious solution. Rather than allow the children to verbally complain throughout the day, she instructed them to fill out a “tattle form,” a detailed questionnaire, if they wish to report the offenses of their classmates. Her hope was that the time and trouble it takes to fill out the form would make them less quick to tell on minor infractions.

To her surprise, she found the children quite ready to complete the forms, and over the course of several days a stack of tattle forms will accrue for her attention. But the tattle-form policy has nevertheless had a very positive effect on the classroom environment. Because she gives diligent attention to each complaint registered, administering discipline when necessary, and, when it isn't, signing the form to show that she has looked into the matter, the children's craving for justice is satisfied. The process confers the fundamental dignity of being heard even upon those whose plea is ultimately rejected.

You may have noticed that the writers of the Psalms do a fair amount of tattling themselves. The psalmists are always being confronted by enemies, wicked men who wish them harm, who often seem to prosper. Complaints such as this one from Psalm 56 are typical:

“All day long they twist my words;

they are always plotting to harm me.

They conspire, they lurk,

they watch my steps, eager to take my life.

On no account let them escape;

in your anger, O God, bring down the nations” (Psalm 56:5-7).

Just as it offends a child's sense of justice when his classmate wrongs him, we are often confused and dismayed when those who run after evil seem to prosper. Why does God allow others to injure us? Why doesn't He protect his own from harm? These are good questions. The psalms were written several thousand years ago, and we are still wondering about the same things. Our enemies may not often hunt us down to physically harm us, but many times we face the same feeling of being pursued by evil.

In Psalm 109, David calls upon God to bring about justice:

“O God, whom I praise, do not remain silent,

for wicked and deceitful men have opened their mouths against me;

they have spoken against me with lying tongues.

With words of hatred they surround me;

they attack me without cause” (Psalm 109:1-3).

This psalm, like the others, does not answer the question of why the wicked have not been brought to justice. But after David has poured out his heart to the Lord, he is able to give Him thanks and praise:

“With my mouth I will greatly extol the Lord;

in the great throng I will praise him.

For he stands at the right hand of the needy one,

to save his life from those who condemn him” (Psalm 109:30-31).

You see, God doesn't always answer the “why” questions in this life. But when we bring our concerns before Him, we can rest assured that our grievances have been heard by a just God. Just as the child feels secure when his teacher has taken full notice of the grievance troubling him, we can be comforted that God is attentive to our plight. Charles Spurgeon put it this way, “Because God is the living God, He can hear; because He is a loving God, He will hear; because He is our covenant God, He has bound Himself to hear us.” We can rest in the knowledge that, though the wicked may prosper now, their fate and ours lie in the hands of the God who hears.

________

Copyright © 2006 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

A Sixth Sense

Matthew 7:3

Long before M. Night Shyamalan's movie irrevocably associated the idea of a sixth sense with scary movies, scientists, psychologists, and charlatans were suggesting that humans may have powers of perceiving in addition to those provided by our five senses. Those that have been proposed range from proprioception — the body's sense of spatial orientation — to synesthesia — the fusion of two senses (a fascinating phenomenon worth looking up).

Sometimes I suspect I have a sixth sense: the ability to keenly see other people's sin. I can spot pride a mile away. Before I could guess your profession or birthplace, I could accurately tell you whether you are greedy or lazy, prone to pharisaism or profligacy.

You may wonder how I became so accomplished at recognizing others' transgressions. Is sin so easily detectable because my vision is sharpened by the lens of piety, because I am jealous for the glory of God? I'm afraid not. Rather, it is the intimate acquaintance with my own sinful nature that makes me aware of sin in others. Although it is tempting to adopt a “holier than thou” posture, the Scriptures teach that I probably wouldn't even notice the sins of my fellow men if I weren't guilty of the same or greater sins.

Jesus asked, “Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when there is the log in your own eye?” (Matthew 7:3-4).

I don't know what your experience has been, but mine has proved Jesus' words true. When I become hyper-sensitive to someone else's sin, I am often guilty of the very same sin. We don't like to see our faults mirrored any more than we like to see someone else show up wearing the same dress at a party, a dress that all of a sudden doesn't seem that attractive anymore. (It looks better on you, friends will whisper reassuringly, and we tell ourselves the same thing about our sin.) I think of it as “plank-in-your-own-eye” vision, working telescopically to magnify my neighbor's sin while at the same time blinding me to that nearer at hand, harbored in my own heart. While it is tempting to call this process discernment, all too often in my own case it is simply disguised judgmentalism.

When I notice someone else's arrogance, it is usually because they have tread upon my pride. In many cases, I may actually be projecting my own sins onto innocent bystanders. When I am in a critical mood, I become insecure, assuming that everyone around me is thinking of me just as critically. The converse is also true: when I am more accepting and gracious to the people around me, I expect them to accept and forgive me.

Is this “sixth sense” a blessing or a curse? It can be either. I can let it increase my sense of self-righteousness, blaming all my problems on other people's sin. Or, I can treat it as an early warning system, using it the way coal miners used canaries to warn themselves of carbon monoxide. When I find myself unusually cognizant of sin in the people around me, I need to step back and examine my own heart. God is able to use anything for our good, and he can even use the specks in our neighbors' eyes to alert us that there is a log in our own.

________

Copyright © 2006 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

Contribute Or Critique?

Ezekiel 36:3

Ye are taken up in the lips of talkers. — Ezekiel 36:3.

In all labour there is profit: but the talk of the lips tendeth only to penury. — Proverbs 14:23.

Responding to criticism of his methods from a group more concerned with theory than with getting the job done D. L. Moody remarked of that group and their criticism, “When all’s said and done, more is said than done.”

Oh, how many a glorious record

Had the angels of me kept,

Had I done instead of spoken:

Had I warred instead of slept. — alt.

from Old Devotional Calendars · Anonymous Quote of D. L. Moody via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Wife Shot Minister To Death After Fight

SELMER, Tenn. - A minister's wife charged with murdering her husband told police she shot him after they argued over family finances and then told him “I'm sorry” as he lay dying in their bedroom, according to testimony at a bond hearing Friday.

Mary Winkler, 32, has been jailed without bond since March 23, accused of killing her husband, Matthew Winkler, 31, at their Church of Christ parsonage in Selmer, a small town 80 miles east of Memphis.

In court Friday, Tennessee Bureau of Investigation Agent Brian Booth read a statement Mary Winkler gave authorities in Alabama, where she was arrested a day after her husband's body was found by church members.

Booth testified that Winkler told police she knew her husband kept a 12-gauge pump-action shotgun in the closet of the home where they lived with their three daughters. She said she didn't remember getting the gun.

“The next thing I remember was hearing a loud boom. I remember thinking it wasn't as loud as I thought it would be,” Booth said, reading from Winkler's statement.

She told police her husband rolled from the bed onto the floor after being shot.

“He asked me why, and I just said `I'm sorry,'“ Booth read from the statement.

Winkler said the two had argued throughout the evening about several things, including family finances. The problems were “mostly my fault,” she said, because she was in charge of keeping the family books.

“He had really been on me lately criticizing me for things - the way I walk, I eat, everything. It was just building up to a point. I was tired of it. I guess I got to a point and snapped,” Booth read to the court.

Winkler is charged with first-degree murder.

from America Online · Woody Baird via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database criticism

Forget It, I Agree With You

During the filming of the classic 1958 western, Big Country, one of the actors, Charlton Heston, thought he could help the director by improving the dialogue in one scene...

During a break he walked over to William Wyler, the director, and picked up Wyler’s copy of the script. When he did this the leather flyleaf opened and Heston saw stamped in small letters the titles of many of Wyler’s most famous films. Seeing that list reminded the actor of the genius and ability of this director whose judgment he was thinking he could improve. Heston put the script down, and as he turned to walk away he said, “Forget it, I agree with you.”

________

Source: KneEmail

I Know Me Worse Than You Do

Mark 15:4

English evangelist George Whitefield (1714-1770) learned that it was more important to please God than to please men. At one point in his ministry, Whitefield received a vicious letter accusing him of wrongdoing. His reply was brief and courteous: “I thank you heartily for your letter. As for what you and my other enemies are saying against me, I know worse things about myself than you will ever say about me. With love in Christ, George Whitefield.”

________

Source: Steve Shepherd, SermonCentral Weekly Newsletter

They Kick Up A Lot of Dust

Describing a small group of vocal critics, Matt Salmon said, “When I was a little kid, I was really into western movies. In one of those, the cavalry was outmanned by attacking Indians, so they put a bunch of branches on the backs of horses, who then kicked up a lot of dust to make it look like there were a lot more people than there were. These guys drag around a lot of branches and kick up a lot of dust.”

from The New York Times Online via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Letting Go

Philippians 3:13

”Forgetting those things which are behind … I press on toward the goal” (Philippians 3:13, NIV).

The story is told of two monks who had gone on a day’s journey. Before returning home, the weather had become nasty. On the way home that evening they had to cross a flooded fjord where a woman who needed help to get to the other side was waiting. Seeing her dilemma, one of the monks picked her up and carried her across.

Later that evening the monk who didn’t help the woman condemned the one who did saying, “You were wrong this afternoon helping that lady. You know that in our order we are to have no dealings with the opposite sex.”

To this the helpful monk replied, “I carried her only across the stream. You are carrying her still.”

When we carry hurts, grudges, resentments, guilt or any unresolved issues from the past and fail to let go of them, we contaminate our present relationships. As another said, “Every unshed tear [and unresolved negative emotion] is a prism through which all of life’s hurts are distorted.”

True, we are to forget the past but we can’t until we resolve it. Repressing hurts isn’t forgetting them. All it does is bury them where they will take root, gather interest and come out in other damaging ways at a later time. We need to get all of these pains off our chest, express them in creative ways, forgive whoever has hurt us, and then let go of them. Only then can we truly forget those negative things which are behind and get on with our life free of these encumbrances.

Suggested prayer: “Dear God, help me to face and resolve all of my past hurts and get rid of all negative emotions so I can let go of my grudges and pains from the past, and be free to get on with life as you meant it to be. Gratefully in Jesus’ name. Amen.”

from (unknown) · Anonymous via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Would You Walk Away From $13 Million For Your Kids?

What would cause a superb Major League Baseball player to walk away from the game — and a big pile of money? God only knows.

In March [2016], Major League Baseball player Adam LaRoche shocked the sports world. LaRoche, a 12-year veteran who averaged more than 20 home runs a year and won many awards for his defensive skills at first base, unexpectedly retired.

By doing so, he walked away from $13 million — the amount left on the final year of a two-year contract with the Chicago White Sox.

Even more shocking than leaving $13 million on the table was the reason he did so: The White Sox had informed LaRoche that his 14-year-old son, Drake, could no longer accompany him in the club house every day.

If you can’t imagine walking away from that kind of money for that kind of reason, you’re not alone.

But then again, a lot of what LaRoche does is peculiar, and I mean that in the best possible way.

It’s fair to say that most of those who commented on his decision, which in the age of social media means practically everyone with access to the Internet, were critical of LaRoche’s decision to put his ideas about being a good father ahead of his team and his teammates.

Not that it matters to LaRoche. He told ABC news that “I have zero regrets.” While he admitted to being angry with the White Sox at first, he added that their actions made his decision to retire easier. As he put it, “I don’t want to be defined by this game. I know there’s a lot more to life.”

Well, this understanding that there’s a lot more to life is why Tim Keown of ESPN wrote in his profile of LaRoche, “You need to forget everything you think you know about professional athletes. Adam LaRoche is different.”

Part of the difference, as LaRoche’s comments suggest, is that he’s not consumed by the sport, despite being the son of one major leaguer and the brother of another. He has other interests, chief among them his Christian faith and his family. It’s why Drake, who attends regular school in the off-season and is home-schooled in the spring quarter, accompanied his dad to the ballpark every day.

It’s why, when LaRoche played for the Washington Nationals and the Chicago White Sox, he and other teammates sponsored “Faith Days” in 2014 and 2015.

And most of all, it’s why LaRoche and Milwaukee Brewers’ pitcher Blaine Boyer spent ten days last November working undercover in Southeast Asian brothels trying to rescue underage sex slaves.

Yes, you heard me right. LaRoche and Boyer, working with a group called Exodus Road and at great personal risk, used a hidden camera to identify trafficked girls — known only by a number pinned to their bikinis — and also their bosses.

As Boyer told Keown, “Something huge happened there for us ... Adam and I truly believe God brought us there and said, ‘This is what I have for you boys.’” On the flight home LaRoche turned to Boyer and said, “What are we doing? We’re going back to play a game for the next eight months?”

Upon his return from Asia, LaRoche was haunted by what he had seen and by the fact that it was going on while he lay safely in his bed.

Keown writes of LaRoche’s “nearly cinematic level of nonconformity” to people’s expectations of what an athlete should be. But a better description would be “peculiar.” Peculiar in the biblical sense of being “a peculiar people.” The Greek word translated “peculiar” means “costly” and “treasured,” but because our treasure is found in different places than the rest of the world, Christian are to be “peculiar” in the more typical sense of being “different,” maybe even considered “weird.”

LaRoche’s confidence to be peculiar, even at the cost of $13 million, comes from the fact that there’s a lot more to life than the world would have us believe, but that God is waiting to show to us — maybe through a peculiar ball player.

________

Copyright (c) 2016 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

from BreakPoint Commentary · John Stonestreet via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database childrearingcriticism

Study: Gay Parents More Likely To Have Gay Kids

Walter Schumm knows what he’s about to do is unpopular: publish a study arguing that gay parents are more likely to raise gay children than straight parents. But the Kansas State University family studies professor has a detailed analysis that past almost aggressively ideological researchers never had.

When one such researcher, Paul Cameron, published a paper in 2006 arguing that children of gay parents were more likely to be gay themselves, the response from the academic press was virulent, to say nothing of the popular press; the Southern Poverty Law Center, for instance, equated Cameron to a Nazi.

Not all of the vitriol was hyperbolic. Cameron does not tolerate gay people. He believes that “homosexual practice is injurious to society.”

The gay press, as far back as the 1980s, labeled Cameron “the most dangerous anti-gay voice in America.” Though Cameron was the first to publish papers on the dangers of secondhand smoke, the scientific community has abandoned him. The American Psychological Association long since dropped him from its membership for an “ethical” violation.

Today, Cameron is the founder and chairman of the Family Research Institute, whose “overriding mission” is to publish “empirical research on issues that threaten the traditional family, particularly homosexuality.”

Schumm doesn’t go for that sort of research. After Cameron’s 2006 paper, Schumm listened as the academic community stated certainty of two things: Cameron was an idiotic bigot; and the existing literature showed little to no societal, cultural or parental influence on sexual orientation.

Schumm began investigating the second premise. “I just want to know the truth about something,” he tells AOL News. And he found it strange that parents can influence so many facets of their children’s lives -- but not in any way their sexual orientation.

Lawyers for the state of Florida heard of Schumm’s fledgling research and invited him in 2008 to testify in a case. The state’s Department of Children and Families was attempting to uphold a ban on gay and lesbian parents adopting children. Schumm’s testimony actually ended up aiding the gay parents in the trial.

He said: “Gay parents can be good foster parents,” and “The decision to permit homosexuals to adopt is best made by the judiciary on a case by case basis.”

Schumm tells AOL News that he agreed to testify as one of the state’s witnesses only if his evidence was not “slanted” for or against gay rights.

But also in his testimony was an inkling of the robust research Schumm has just completed. His study on sexual orientation, out next month, says that gay and lesbian parents are far more likely to have children who become gay. “I’m trying to prove that it’s not 100 percent genetic,” Schumm tells AOL News.

His study is a meta-analysis of existing work. First, Schumm extrapolated data from 10 books on gay parenting; Cameron, for what it’s worth, had only looked at three, and offered no statistical analysis in his paper. Schumm skewed his data so that only self-identified gay and lesbian children would be labeled as such.

This is important because sometimes Schumm would come across a passage of children of gay parents who said they were “adamant about not declaring their sexual orientation at all.” These people would be labeled straight, even though the passage’s implication was that they were gay.

Schumm concluded that children of lesbian parents identified themselves as gay 31 percent of the time; children of gay men had gay children 19 percent of the time, and children of a lesbian mother and gay father had at least one gay child 25 percent of the time.

Furthermore, when the study restricted the results so that they included only children in their 20s -- presumably after they’d been able to work out any adolescent confusion or experimentation -- 58 percent of the children of lesbians called themselves gay, and 33 percent of the children of gay men called themselves gay. (About 5 to 10 percent of the children of straight parents call themselves gay, Schumm says.)

Schumm next went macro, poring over an anthropological study of various cultures’ acceptance of homosexuality. He found that when communities welcome gays and lesbians, “89 percent feature higher rates of homosexual behavior.”

Finally, Schumm looked at the existing academic studies, the ones used to pillory Cameron’s work. In all there are 26 such studies. Schumm ran the numbers from them and concluded that, surprisingly, 20 percent of the kids of gay parents were gay themselves. When children only 17 or older were included in the analysis, 28 percent were gay.

Abbie Goldberg is a psychology professor at Clark University, and the author of “Lesbian and Gay Parents and Their Children: Research on the Family Life Cycle,” which this year won the Distinguished Book Award from the APA. She hasn’t read Schumm’s study, only seen the abstract. But she says, in general, that a meta-analysis of this nature relies on sample sizes that are often too small and may furthermore brim with participants whose perspective is firmly aligned with the LGBT community. In other words, they’re aware of these sorts of studies and seek them out.

“The fundamental problem with this [type of meta-analysis] is such samples tend to be biased,” Goldberg tells AOL News.

Schumm says he guarded against that by seeking out so many different works. And across all his data -- the 10 books he consulted, the anthropological study, the scientific articles -- he noticed how lesbians begat more lesbians. In Schumm’s study, he quotes from the extant literature the stories of young women, describing how being gay was never frowned upon in their household, and so that “option” was available to them. That said, Schumm also finds evidence of gay mothers pushing their daughters, upset over a relationship with a man, to “try out women.”

Sponsored LinksBut couldn’t gay men also tell their sons this? Yes, but Schumm tells AOL News that most gay men have at some point been with a woman, so they understand why their sons might date them. Whereas the literature shows some lesbians “have a hatred of men that’s intense,” Schumm says.

Schumm says it shouldn’t have taken until 2010 to do the meta-analysis. Too often his colleagues impose “liberal or progressive political interpretations” on their studies, which inhibit further inquiry. “It’s kind of sad,” he tells AOL News.

As if expecting a political backlash himself, Schumm concludes his study with a quote from philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer. “All truth passes through three stages: First it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”

from America Online News · Paul Kix via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database childrearingcriticism

Judgment vs. Judgmentalism

Luke 6:37

Opinion columnists, like the rest of humanity, walk a fine line between judgment (holding people accountable to a standard we did not create) and judgmentalism (thinking ourselves morally superior because we haven’t committed the acts of others).

Since writing of my friendship with the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, I have been flooded with responses. Some have been kind, but many — perhaps a majority — have heaped on me the revulsion the writers also heaped on Mr. Kennedy. Perhaps the unkindest cut of all was the writer who accused me of “going wobbly.”

That many on the left continue to dance on the grave of Richard M. Nixon and to revile George W. Bush does not give the right permission to engage in eye-for-an-eye behavior. Many on the right invoke the name of Jesus on Sunday and tear down a politician whose policies they don’t like the rest of the week.

Tearing down policy is fine, but diminishing the value of a fellow human being simply because you don’t like his politics (or his personal behavior) is not a good strategy for persuading him to change. It also raises the level of invectiveness, which is injurious not only to our politics, but to the one contributing the invectiveness.

What am I trying to accomplish when I engage in criticism? Do I want to present superior arguments I hope my political opponent will at least consider, if not adopt, or is my objective simply to make me feel better by engaging in moral superiority? If it’s the latter, I am committing the sin of pride, which goes before all the others.

Mr. Kennedy’s list of sins is well known, from sexual promiscuity to offering help to Soviet General Secretary Yuri Andropov in exchange for Mr. Andropov’s assistance in defeating Ronald Reagan in the 1984 presidential election. The latter act is properly criticized, even denounced. Discussion of the former can easily fall into the judgmental category.

Public exposure of private sins reminds us of our own coverups. Each of us is capable of doing what Mr. Kennedy did, given the right circumstances and opportunity. This doesn’t excuse his actions. It does explain them.

This was the great offense laid on Jesus of Nazareth, whose name was invoked on several occasions at the Kennedy funeral and burial. Those who hated and rejected Jesus did so because He exposed what was in them, and no one likes his dark soul exposed to the light. It is one reason some of us wear makeup and nice clothes and blow-dry our hair and why others consider plastic surgery as they age. If we seek to cover external flaws in these ways, how much more would we undertake to hide the internal ones? Vanity, vanity; all is vanity.

This is not to absolve Mr. Kennedy of his sins, only to say that we are neither the judge nor the one who can absolve. We can’t forgive ourselves, or, as I put it to a TV interviewer who asked me: “Bottom line: Senator Kennedy, a good man?”

“Only God is good,” I responded. “The rest of us are sinners.”

It is not hypocritical to care for someone who behaves badly. In fact, it is the height of love to do so because you want him to have a changed life and attitude that will help him behave better for his own sake and that of his family. Denouncing that person and condemning him to hell is not likely to make him more open to things that will lead him in the other direction. Who among us has lived a perfect life that would be acceptable to God?

Twila Paris wrote a song that might speak even to hard hearts when they think of the One who forgave their own sins and who was never accused of going wobbly: “How beautiful the tender eyes that choose to forgive and never despise.”

I strongly opposed much of what Mr. Kennedy proposed, but I cared for him as a person. Those without sin, send your condemnation stones to this newspaper.

Counter-Culture Advice: Be Judgmental

Luke 6:37

[Article is headed by an image of the Phoenixville Baptist Church (PA) signboard: “No Judgmental People Allowed. All Others Welcome.” The author obviously finds this illogical and contradictory.]

It’s a good testament to modern culture the fact that the phrase: “who are you to judge?” has become a token of great wisdom and esteem. I especially like the variations on this phrase, “don’t judge, you can’t know.” “That’s what you say.” “Don’t throw rocks at glass houses or ... something.”

If you can’t tell from my general snarkyness, I hate these phrases; I hate them passionately, completely, almost religiously.

You see, my views differ somewhat.

I contend that, counter to the dominant trends in modern culture, frequent judgment is a good thing, even frequent and private judgment of other people or of groups (which is usually what inspires these phrases.)

I contend that moral appraisal of other people’s lives is inescapable; and absolutely necessary for our survival.

I contend that the way to being a better, more compassionate and wise person; is not judging less, but more.

In the same vein, I contend that — all else being equal — a society that judges too much is better off than a society that judges too little.

What is actually being criticized by the “anti-judgmentals” ( ....or as a will henceforth call them: the “proponents of non-think.”) is not the act of judging people to their face - most polite and civilized men condemn this, it barely needs to be said - no, what is being criticized is the act of judging others in the safety of your own privacy, in your own mind. The very act of evaluation becomes sin.

The proponents on non-think don’t want you to come to the same conclusions as they have; they want you to have never thought alternatively. Their goals have never been about persuasion, they’ve been about manipulation; about fear and control and the casual exploitation of uncertainty.

Scarier yet, you only have to infect one generation with this particular brand of mental poison. The next generation will gladly take hold the charge; they will repeat the same arguments, apply the same tactics, without ever examining why.

You’ll probably bring up a few choice examples of people who judged wrongly; of racists and fools, of the deluded and the biased, or homophobes and dogmatists; and maybe a few Nazis, for good measure.

To which I reply: Shut-Up You Dirty Hippie! Your arguments are silly and self-refuting. Contradictions are springing up like weeds in Texas. This is probably the reason why you don’t have any friends.

Imagine you ask the average person a question: what do you think is better, the average life of an alcoholic, or the average life of a non-alcoholic? I doubt most people’s answers would surprise you.

Now ask yourself, how do people come to that conclusion? The answer is simple: they evaluated the evidence, which naturally entails evaluated the lives of others, and the rest followed quite naturally.

Now think of all the judgments you’ve made, of all the conclusions you have come to over the course of your life. Like most people, there are too many to count; every conclusions you have come to, every value that you hold, every action that you have taken contains an endless stream of judgments and re-judgments; even if you weren’t fully conscience of this happening. This is true of almost every bit of mental activity that we perform. Ironically, even the phrase “Don’t judge” contains a plethora of judgments and conclusions.

Point is: evaluation is inescapable. We wouldn’t be able to survive a day without it. Our minds have this nasty little tendency to come to conclusions weather you like it or not. Your choice is weather you come to those conclusions through conscience, careful, and deliberate thought; or let it spring up automatically, placed there by others, by dominant trends, or a reflection of your subconscious.

You say that judgment of others is mean, and sometimes petty; I say that far more problems in history have been caused by a lack of judgment then too much of it.

You say that judgment is flawed and immoral because the world is too complicated, because human biases and prejudices get in the way, because the standards of proof are difficult to apply; I say your logic supports the opposite conclusion. It is precisely because of these reasons that frequent judgments and re-judgments are necessary.

You see, because I agree with you. Even under perfect conditions, human judgment is prone to inevitable — and sometimes fatal — errors; and we are never working under perfect conditions.

We owe it to ourselves, and to others, to hone our minds to the best they can be. To enhance our intellect, our logic, our reason to what limits we can find.

Your brain is a body part like any other; it has an identity, it works better under some circumstance than others; and like many other body parts, it functions better when used frequently, and atrophies with disuse.

Why is it that we accept the phrase “if you want to get good at something: practice, practice, practice” as true in almost all aspects of life, but somehow leave the functioning of our minds out of this?

You see, we need to judge not just because our survival depends on it, not just because it is an inescapable part of life; we need to judge because we want our judgment to become better. Yes, the universe can be difficult to deal with, difficult to understand, but this fact is precisely why we need to put so much effort, deliberate and focused effort, into our thinking.

We can learn to judge well.

Beyond all the forced implications and the fear and the subtle manipulations, the arguments against the use of your mind are simply not very good. Striped of all its clothing, most of the arguments are reducible to simple associations. All judgment is equivalent to the worst judgments; Irrational, vile, and mean judgments put in the same category as careful and just ones.

People who take careful aim with their judgment, who evaluate and adjust when they notice they haven’t hit the mark should not be put in the same category as people who shot from the hip, and don’t even look in the right direction, and are blind besides.

Trying to make these two things equivalent is like saying a surgeon is the same as Hannibal Lector. Yes, they both cut people up, but for very different reasons, to very different ends. And you would never say surgery is wrong because Hannibal Lector makes a mess of things.

In the name of wisdom and clear thinking: the ‘non-thinks’ make clarity and thinking impossible. In the name of “niceness” and “compassion”: they undermine the only thing that true kindness and compassion can spring from.

In the name of making a better world: they use fear of being ostracized by nice company, and implications, and bad associations; tactics we should all find despicable, even when the ‘none-thinks’ ends are just and right.

So I beg you, don’t let these people get away with it. Don’t let them scare you, or humiliate you, or hobble you in any way.

How Do You Handle Criticism?

Acts 11:2

Arthur Flake outlined a simple plan for growing an ongoing Bible study ministry, which he called Sunday School. That plan came to be known as Flake’s Formula and included these elements: Know the possibilities, Expand the organization, Enlist and train leaders, Provide resources, and Go after the people. In his notes, Flake identified two objections he expected to hear from his critics: It won’t work here and We tried that. Most leaders have encountered these same two, tiring objections at some point in their lives.

In Numbers 20, we find Moses yet again being badgered by the Hebrews. He was grieving the death of his sister -- the person who watched him float in a basket as a baby before being rescued by Pharaoh’s daughter -- but his grief did not deter his critics. Moses and the Hebrews were in Kadesh and in need of water -- again. One might think by now the Hebrews would have known God would provide, but that does not appear to be the case. Instead they bring their complaints to Moses with accusations and regrets. Moses and Aaron put their personal grief aside and humbly approached God. God showed up and gave them a plan of action without them even asking. Problem solved.

Our only refuge is going to God and seeing His counsel. Once He provides us with that counsel, we then can act with confidence. Unfortunately, Moses and Aaron did everything right, except follow to the letter what God told them to do. They struck the rock just as they had done in the past, but God had told them to speak to the rock.

Criticism can wear on the strongest of people, especially when they are dealing with a personal loss. We can know that even in the most difficult of circumstances and when facing our harshest critics, we can depend upon God to identify our next steps. Our responsibility is to obey, following exactly what He directs us to do.

Discussion Questions:

What does the way a leader responds to criticism reveal about his or her character?

How can a believer deal with criticism in a God-honoring way?

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate