Menu

145 Sermon Illustrations on Abortion

145 illustrations Page 1 of 3

Abortion in Christian preaching confronts the sanctity of life, emphasizing the unborn as image-bearers of God deserving protection (Psalm 139:13-16). Illustrations often use vivid contrasts between life and death, innocence and violation, underscoring the moral and spiritual crisis abortion represents (Jeremiah 1:5). This subject calls for compassion, repentance, and a defense of the vulnerable.

It's Wrong To Eat People

John 6:51

Packer had claimed in a column that no Packer had ever been a notorious criminal. Reader pointed out that the notorious Colorado cannibal, Alfred E. Packer, belonged to his clan. (Further info on Packer: four men in his party were found dead, all of them stripped of flesh. According to Colorado apocrypha, the Judge said, "Packer, you depraved Republican son of a such-and-such, there were only five democrats in Hinsdale County, and you ate them all!" Packer was sentenced to 40 years. See Irving Stone, "Men to Match My Mountains," page 433.) The University of Colorado in Boulder has an "Alfred E. Packer Memorial Grill."[1]

It's wrong to eat people, either literally or figuratively.

In Bible, "eating up" people is a picture of ruining them for personal gain. Quote from Micah attacks practices of leading citizens. Brutal economic exploitation.

. Debater destroys his opponents with ridicule. Wrong.

. Character assassination, gossip, vendettas.

. Churches eat up pastors.

. Abortion. (Packer watched hamster eat its young.)

Law may allow it, but eating people is wrong.

.............................

Further application - feeding on Jesus (John 6). Necessary for salvation (or what salvation is all about). Closest possible communion.

________

1. Original article mistakenly says, "The Colorado University, Denver campus, has an 'Alfred E. Packer Memorial Dining Hall.'"

from Christianity Today magazine · J. I. Packer via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database gossip

Between Pro-life and Pro-death

American Baptist Churches (USA) denomination is moving away from pro-choice stance to a more neutral one. A response to strong grassroots pressure, will be voted on in June 1988. A spokesperson for the task force, Mary Mild, said the pro-choice stance "just didn't reflect the feelings in the congregations."

Biblical Evangelist, June 1988, page 14: The ABC has backed off from its "pro-death position on abortion...to come up with a compromise position, somewhere between pro-life and pro-death."

Times Reporter Newspaper (?) Listed under 00096+ (entered June 9,'88)

ABC is backing away from its support of abortion rights. Similar reassessments have come in some other denominations, either stiffening opposition to abortion, or qualifying acceptance of it. But some still take an essentially pro-choice position. This was the first such definitive shift projected among the larger, socially activist Protestant bodies. Stemmed both from simmering discontent with the past stance and the swelling tide of abortions in the country. Gloria Marshall of Alto Loma, Calif. is head of the ABC task force, has been studying the issue for two years. She termed the projected new stand "responsibility to choose life. It is a pro-life stance in affirming the sacredness of life as a gift of God."

from Christianity Today magazine via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Abortion On A Christian Campus

Biola University professor Dr. George Nishida, Chairman of the Department of Sociology, not only advocates abortion, which he acknowledges is murder, in his classroom and in the school newspaper, Biola Chimes, but confesses he has personally driven Biola co-eds to abortion clinics and has, on several occasions, paid for the abortions. "We find this shocking, horrifying in fact, and disgusting."

#207

*

from Biblical Evangelist · Richard Sumner via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

An Archbishop Rattles A Saber

Roman Catholic leader, Cardinal O'Connor, is threatening to excommunicate

RCC politicians who are pro-choice. He says they should accept political

defeat rather than sacrifice human life.

1345

*

from Newsweek · Kenneth L. Woodward via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database politicsdiscipline

Born Unwanted

"Born Unwanted" argues that studies of social pathology show that unwanted children are more likely to be pathological. This offers "a strong argument for a woman's right to abortion." Rev. Guptill, in letter, argues that blacks, Indians, etc, are also more likely to be pathological, "but it is barbaric to conclude that because the risks are higher it would be better for them never to be born. ... Would anyone advocate aborting all pregnancies in these groups because the risks are higher?" R. Thomas Holder in another letter says the argument that death is better than a possibly handicapping situation reminds him of the late Al Capp's Fearless Fosdick. He seems to recall that Fosdick roamed the streets shooting people in the head to prevent them from eating a can of poisoned beans which had slipped into the market.

*

from Newsweek via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

We Must Be Willing To Forgive Ourselves

Luke 22:61

We must be willing to forgive ourselves.

Girl named Patsy got involved sexually at 13, then later with a counselor.

Asked Jesus to forgive her but could not accept it. Peter and Paul grappled personally with the same problem. To find peace we must be willing and able to forgive ourselves. (Ps 103).

Consequences of not forgiving ourselves.

1. Self-punishment.

2. Uncertainty.

3. Sense of unworthiness.

4. Excessive behavior.

5. False humility.

6. Self-deprivation.

Why we can't forgive ourselves.

1. Belief in performance-based forgiveness.

2. Disappointment in self.

3. Adjustment and surrender to guilt.

4. Expectation of repeated sin.

How we can forgive ourselves.

Step 1. Recognize the problem.

Step 2. Repent of the sin.

Step 3. Reaffirm trust.

Step 4. Confess freedom and choose to receive it.

(From Stanley's book "Forgiveness").

*

from Discipleship Journal · Charles Stanley via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database sindivorce

Momentum of the Prolife Movement

A coalition of right-to-life groups from mainline churches has formed, called National Pro-Life Religious Council. The momentum of the prolife movement is shown by the abandoning of the prochoice stand by the ABC in favor of a neutral stance. The ABC also withdrew from RCAR, Religious Coalition for Abortion Rights.

*

from Christianity Today magazine via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Are Abortion Protestors Right Or Wrong?

Dr. Charles Stanley believes the abortion protests in Atlanta are unbiblical for 3 reasons:

1. Trespass laws have nothing to do with abortion.

2. The law neither requires abortions nor prohibits them, but makes them

permissible with certain restrictions.

3. Women who have abortions are free moral agents responsible before

Almighty God for their actions.

Whether he is right or wrong, what are Christians doing to cry out against this holocaust?

from Biblical Evangelist · Dr. Robert Sumner via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

The World Without Christianity

Galatians 3:28

A couple of years ago, Jeremiah Johnston and his wife binge-watched the HBO series “The Man in the High Castle.” The series is set in a world where Nazi Germany and Japan won World War II and now occupy the United States.

It’s a world where euthanasia is mandatory, and the ashes of victims fall on passersby. In other words, it’s a world without Christianity, not to mention Judaism.

After watching the series, Johnston’s wife told him that he needed to write about what they had just watched. He did, and the result is his outstanding book, “Unimaginable: What the World Would Be Like Without Christianity.”

But Johnston’s book is not about a fictional world like the “The Man in the High Castle.” His book is straight out of history, about the real world that Christianity replaced — a pagan world that is showing signs of a comeback in this post-Christian age.

Johnston introduces us to the world in which Christianity was born, and eventually transformed. He tells the story of Hilarion, an otherwise-unremarkable Roman citizen who had traveled to Egypt. He writes to his pregnant wife that he may not make it home in time for the birth. So he wishes her “good luck” and then tells her what to do when the child is born: “If it is a boy, keep it; if it is a girl, throw it out.”

As I said, there was nothing remarkable about Hilarion or his attitude towards his soon-to-be-born child. As Johnston tells us, “ ... in the first-century Roman world ... killing an unwanted child was no big deal.” He quotes the philosopher Seneca, who wrote: “Unnatural progeny we destroy; we drown even children who at birth are weak or abnormal.”

Into this world came Christianity, whose teaching and practice was 180 degrees from that of the surrounding societies. The early second century Christian document known as “the “Didache” told Christians, “Do not murder a child by abortion, nor kill it at birth.” The Epistle of Barnabas, which dates from a few decades later, similarly said, “Do not murder a child by abortion, nor, again, destroy that which is born.”

Believe it or not, infanticide is just one example of the cruelty and callousness that characterized the ancient world. Anyone who wasn’t a nobleman — emphasis on the “man” — was a potential, and often actual, victim of this same kind of cruelty: infants, women, slaves, and the poor to name but a few.

Against this backdrop, Paul’s declaration that “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus” had the potential to turn the world upside down (Galatians 3:28).

And that’s exactly what it did. It took time, and there were fits and starts, but Christianity made the world we now take for granted, possible.

As Johnston tells readers, the West’s rejection of Christianity threatens to undo this world. For those who scoff at such an idea, he lays out the recent historical record, which isn’t pretty. Evils such as scientific racism, which posits that some groups are inherently inferior to others, eugenics, and its ultimate expression, the Third Reich, all have their origins in worldviews that rejected Christianity.

He reminds us that these literally godless worldviews have left a body count in the hundreds of millions: the Holocaust, Stalin’s victims, the killing fields of Cambodia, and the estimated seventy million Chinese who died under Mao.

Given this historical record, it is unimaginable that we should want to revert to a world prior to Christianity. Or at last it should be unimaginable.

________

Resources:

Unimaginable: What Our World Would Be Like Without Christianity

Jeremiah J. Johnston | Baker Books | 2017

Unimaginable: What Our World Would Be Like Without Christianity, webinar

Warren Cole Smith, Jeremiah Johnston | Colson Center | February 2019

________

Copyright (c) 2019 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. “BreakPoint” is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

from BreakPoint Commentary · John Stonestreet with Roberto Rivera via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database christianitypaganism

The Perverse Logic of Abortion

Mark 9:37

Abortion is back as front-page news and is once again in the forefront of the nation's concern. The nomination of Judge Samuel L. Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court and the Court's consideration of an important abortion case this week have focused attention on the issue and energized both sides in the controversy.

Nevertheless, the issue of abortion is not merely a major front in the nation's culture war. It is also a deeply personal tragedy. Every single abortion terminates an innocent human life, and each abortion represents an individual moral catastrophe. Yet the vast majority of Americans go about their everyday lives, even as the death toll from abortion continues to rise.

A poignant and chilling perspective on the issue of abortion has been provided by an article published in the November 29, 2005 edition of the LOS ANGELES TIMES. In “Offering Abortion, Rebirth,” reporter Stephanie Simon takes readers into the life and logic of one of the nation's most notorious abortion providers.

Simon focuses on Dr. William F. Harrison of Fayetteville, Arkansas. Dr. Harrison has performed abortions at his clinic on College Avenue in Fayetteville for more than twenty years. Now, at age seventy, Harrison estimates that he has terminated at least twenty thousand pregnancies.

Readers of Simon's article will be shocked by Harrison's candor. He refers to himself as an “abortionist” and acknowledges, “I am destroying life.” According to the article, Dr. Harrison gave up his practice of obstetrics in 1991, having delivered six thousand babies. “'Childbirth,' he says, 'should be joyous; a woman should never consider it a punishment or an obligation,'“ Simon reports. As Dr. Harrison states, “We try to make sure she doesn't ever feel guilty for what she feels she has to do.”

The very fact that Dr. Harrison has delivered six thousand babies and aborted twenty thousand others, coupled with his shocking candor, means that a look into his practice and philosophy of life offers rare insights into why a highly trained medical practitioner, supposedly committed to the preservation of all life, would dedicate the largest part of his professional career to abortion.

Simon takes her readers right into Dr. Harrison's clinic. She describes an eighteen-year-old with braces who has come for an abortion. “A pink blanket is draped over her stomach. She's 13 weeks pregnant, at the very end of the first trimester. She hasn't told her parents,” Simon reports.

Once the young woman has been given an anesthetic, along with Valium and a drug intended to dilate her cervix, Harrison administers a dose of Versed, a sedative that “will wipe out her memory of everything that happens during the 20 minutes she's in the operating room.” As Simon comments, “It's so effective that patients who return for a follow-up exam often don't recognize Harrison.”

“This is not going to be nearly as hard as you anticipate,” Harrison tells the patient. After the doctor has observed the fetus on an ultrasound screen, noting the curve of the baby's head, the bend of an elbow, and the ball of a clenched fist, he tells his patient: “You may feel some cramping while we suction everything out.” This warning is followed by his observation, “You're going to hear a sucking sound.”

According to the report, the abortion took only two minutes. “We've gotten everything out of there,” Harrison assures her.

Speaking to the reporter, this young woman acknowledged that she understood that abortion is, at least in some sense, morally wrong. “There's things wrong with abortion,” she commented. “But I want to have a good life. And provide a good life for my child.”

Simon also provides insights drawn from other patients who have come to Dr. Harrison's clinic for abortions. One high school volleyball player “says she doesn't want to give up her body for nine months.” A single mother of three “says she couldn't bear to give away a child and have to wonder every day if he were loved.” As Simon reports, this woman believed that ending the pregnancy would be easier, so long as she doesn't think about “what could have been.”

The logic offered by many of these women appears to be little more than an effort to convince themselves that they are not killing an unborn baby. Simon writes of a seventeen-year-old who assures Harrison's nurse that she does not consider the unborn child within her to be a baby. “Not until it's developed,” she explains. The nurse tells her that the fetus will not be completely formed until about the ninth week. “Yours is more like a chicken yolk,” she asserts. “Then no,” the girl said, “it's not a baby.”

According to Dr. Harrison, the moral status of the unborn child is entirely up to the woman herself: “It's not a baby to me until the mother tells me it's a baby,” he stated.

The stories of other women visiting the clinic are both heartbreaking and deeply troubling. A twenty-year-old administrative assistant, preparing to end her first pregnancy, assured herself: “It's an everyday occurrence. It's not like this is a rare thing.” She didn't like having to pay 750 dollars for the abortion, but she demonstrated no doubt about her decision. “It's not like it's illegal. It's not like I'm doing anything wrong.” Furthermore, “I've been praying a lot and that's been a real source of strength for me. I really believe God has a plan for us all. I have a choice, and that's part of my plan.”

That last statement represents one of the most convoluted -- and yet revealing -- comments made by any of the women interviewed in Simon's article. The logic of “choice” finds its ultimate culmination in this young woman's decision to abort her baby as “part of my plan.”

Another young woman has come to the clinic seeking to terminate her pregnancy so that she can fit into her wedding dress in coming weeks. A 32-year-old college student acknowledges that she has already had four abortions in the last twelve years. Abortion, she tells Simon, “is a bummer, but no big stress.”

Dr. William F. Harrison is one of the most outspoken abortion providers in the United States. In a statement provided to Physicians for Reproductive Choice and Health, Dr. Harrison commented: “I provide abortions because if I did not, my patients would have to travel anywhere from 90 to 200 miles to get this service in an abortion clinic from someone whose qualifications are totally unknown. I am firmly committed to the ideal that all people, male and female, should have as much autonomy as possible and that they should have the best medical care feasible. That means that some caring and competent physicians in each community should provide abortions.” He continued: “In my community, all the other physicians providing abortions from the early 1970s to 1984 were frightened away from their duty to their patients by pro-life militants. I have no intention of permitting extremists to dictate my morals, my ethics or my professional activities then, now or ever.”

In an article published in the August 2002 edition of the newsletter of the Reproductive Freedom Task Force, Dr. Harrison explained, “No one, neither the patient receiving an abortion, nor the person doing the abortion, is ever, at any time, unaware that they are ending a life. We just don't believe that a developing embryo or fetus whose mother cannot or will not accept it, has the same moral claims on us, claims to autonomy and justice that an adolescent or adult woman has.”

Perhaps the most shocking dimension of Dr. Harrison's candor is the manner in which he cloaks his practice of abortion in religious language. In the LOS ANGELES TIMES article, Harrison refers to women who have terminated their pregnancies as being “born again” through the experience.

In his statement published in the Reproductive Freedom Task Force newsletter, Harrison claimed to have heard “a still, small voice asking, 'Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?’ to which I was at last compelled to reply, 'Here am I, send me.'“ Here we confront the breathtaking delusion of a man who would cite God's call to the prophet Isaiah as a parallel to his “calling” to be an abortionist.

The debate over abortion is often reduced to a battle over statistics and politics. Stephanie Simon's article should remind us all that the reality of abortion is unspeakably ugly, undeniably tragic, and morally corrupting. The statements made by these women seeking abortions -- and by the doctor who so gladly performs them -- reveals the true nature of the challenge we face. The culture of death is rarely revealed with such clarity.

*

[Original illustration at this number was deleted for being obsolete]

from http://www.albertmohler.com · Dr. R. Albert Mohler Jr., President of Southern Baptist Seminary via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Female Abortion In India

In India, one study showed that 7,999 out of 8,000 abortions were female fetuses. Females require a large dowry (though supposed to be illegal) and do not contribute anything to the family. Feminists oppose this practice and call it "feticide". Author says there is no difference from this and standard abortion - every abortion is "selective".

"Feminists have no moral standing from which to speak out against the selective abortion of girls. In insisting that they do, they have become just another special interest group, like the church or the state, trying to prevent women from exercising their right to choose. Once it is permitted to kill some fetuses for some reasons, I don't see why it isn't permitted to kill all for any reason."

from Newsweek · Jo McGowan via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database feminism

Attacking the Real "Jane Roe"

Norma McCorvey was the "Jane Roe" in the abortion decision "Roe vs. Wade." She claimed to have been raped but wasn't. She had the baby (so the case would go to court) and gave it up for adoption. Now she is getting involved in the pro-choice movement. She has negotiated with an agent to have a TV movie made about her. She still wishes she could have had an abortion so she would not spend time wondering what her child was doing.

[Later she becomes a born-again Christian]

#791

*

from Newsweek via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database involvement

Pro-choice: A Sleeping Giant Awakes

Large pro-choice rally in Washington to counter possible reversal of Roe vs. Wade by the Supreme Court. A sidebar lists statistics of views on abortion according to surveys over the last 15 years.

#809

*

from Newsweek via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

The Old Gate

Sermon series on 10 gates in Nehemiah. The "old gate" (or path) must be stuck to, and it needs to be repaired. Application made to abortion, divorce, sex, and old fashioned morality.

from Biblical Evangelist · Dr. Robert Sumner via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database sexabortiondivorce

Who Broke the Baby?

All our children were in bed; the late television news was over, and I was putting the finishing touches to a presentation for medical students scheduled to be given the next day. As I reviewed some slides which might be used, there appeared on the screen a picture of an abortion victim, aged two and one-half months’ gestation; her body had been dismembered by a curette, the long handled knife used in a D&C abortion procedure.

Suddenly I heard, rather than saw, another person near me. At the sound of a sharp intake of breath, I turned to find that my youngest son, then a sleepy, rumpled three-year-old, had unexpectedly and silently entered the room. His small voice was filled with great sadness as he asked, “Who broke the baby?”

How could this small, innocent child see what so many adults cannot see?

(Garton’s reason for deciding to become a prolife activist)

from Christianity Today magazine · Jean Staker Garton via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database lifechildreninnocence

Saving the Preborn and Pulling "Human Weeds"

Romans 13

Arguments used by the Rescue Movement include the disobedience of the Hebrew midwifes toward Pharaoh’s command to kill the Hebrew babies. Romans 13 is not their final authority.

“Evangelicals want both respect for life and respect for authority, and at the door of the abortion clinic, these values collide.”

One rescuer told the judge after her 28th arrest, “You cannot rehabilitate people from resisting evil.”

from Christianity Today magazine · Mark Belz via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Saving the Preborn and Pulling "Human Weeds"

Book review about Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. She was a Malthusian socialist who regarded poor people as "human weeds" to be sterilized whenever possible. She felt that "the most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is to kill it." She was closely connected with the "race purification" scientists of the Nazi party, being convinced that the "inferior races" were a "menace to civilization", thus, she wanted to create a "race of thoroughbreds."

from Christianity Today magazine · George Grant via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database value of liferacism

Did Christians Abandon Their Children?

John 14:18

Boswell's book analyses the ancient practice of abandoning children and

finds that Christians in the middle ages also followed the practice. The

reviewer argues that early Christians did not. One form of abandonment was to

leave the children at a monastery where they were brought up as nuns or monks.

*1161

from Christianity Today magazine · John Boswell via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database children

Our Personal God

Psalms 139

Communion sermon on Psalm 139.

1. God knows us.

2. God is all-present.

3. God is all-creative.

a. Application to abortion.

4. God is all-holy.

*1207

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Serm90t.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database rememberabortion

A Mother's Torture In the Soviet Union

Mark 9:37

It was the spring of 1975 and Lida, twenty-four years of age and a committed believer, was working as a nurse’s aid in a maternity ward. Across the street abortions were performed routinely. As it was not uncommon to perform abortions very late in pregnancies, occasionally babies were born alive. In such situations, the newborns were carried across the street to where Lida worked. Lida was appalled to discover that no special attention was paid to these premature victims of abortion. Often, they were simply left to die.

On March 31, 1975 a baby boy was brought in -- the victim of an abortion in the seventh month. Contrary to all expectations, the little boy lived, even though for days he was barely cared for. Lida took pity on the boy and obtained permission from the natural mother and hospital authorities to adopt the child. An official birth certificate, which I translated, listed Lida as the mother of the boy Lida named Aaron Vashchenko.

Aaron survived, then thrived in the warmth and love of the large Vashchenko family. There were already thirteen children, but the generous Christian family made room for one more precious child from God. However, certain city officials were not pleased when they learned that the Vashchenko family, with whom they had had conflicts for years, had adopted a child. Plans were made to deprive Lida of her “parental rights”. This was a tactic that the Vashchenkos understood all too well. The memories of what had happened to Lida, Lyuba, and Nadya in the 1960’s were still fresh.

The authorities were absolutely unscrupulous in their efforts to “save” this little child from the clutches of believers. They compelled the natural mother to say she feared that the Vashchenkos intended to “sacrifice” Aaron. Faced with the prospect of losing Aaron by force, Lida went into hiding. When she eventually returned home, authorities broke in, beat her, and stole Aaron. Aaron was in perfect health on July 17, 1975, when he was abducted. It was the last time the Vashchenkos saw him alive.

When Chernogorsk officials informed Lida that Aaron had died, she was driven by an indomitable will to find out if this were indeed true and, if so, what had happened. Lida and her father visited the local cemetery. To their great sorrow, they learned that a few days earlier the authorities had brought a little boy in for burial. He had reportedly been found in a field, abandoned by his parents.

from The Puzzle Of The Soviet Church · Kent R. Hill via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database persecution

In Reluctant Praise of Extremism

John 2:17

Barry Goldwater's infamous line defines extremism:

"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice and ...

moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue."

Operation Rescue is a modern form of extremism. Abolition is an older form. They were all-or-nothing, refused compromise, and took dramatic steps to bring the issue before the nation. Abraham Lincoln was not an extremist or an abolitionist. To abolitionists, slavery was not an unfortunate and outmoded institution - it was sin.

The language of sin is extreme language. As William Lloyd Garrison put it famously in the first issue of his newspaper, "The Liberator":

On this subject, I do not wish to think, or speak, or write, with

moderation. No! no! Tell a man whose house is on fire to give a

moderate alarm; tell him to moderately rescue his wife from the

hands of a ravisher; tell the mother to gradually extricate her

babe from the fire into which it has fallen - but urge me not to

use moderation in a cause like the present. I am in earnest - I

will not equivocate - I will not excuse - I will not retreat a

single inch - AND I WILL BE HEARD.

Garrison was usually not this tame. He burned the Constitution on the Fourth of July. Theodore Weld was proudly known as "the most mobbed man in America." Abolitionists never gained a majority. The more they argued, the more intransigent Southerners became. When abolitionism began in 1830, many Southerners thought slavery was wrong; a few years later abolitionists would be run out or killed. Abolitionism destroyed dialogue.

America was founded on compromise, but abolitionism would not allow it. Thirty years later, after a war, slavery ceased. Some historians discount the role of abolitionism, but without it the sense of urgency to do something about slavery disappears. The hope of moderates who chose against extremism is that sense and good will can prevail. But such progress is not always certain. (Compare Nazi Germany and South Africa.)

Current times tempt people to extremism. But extremism carries costs. A good many evangelical prohibitionists lost their faith. Some were disappointed in the church's mealy-mouthed response to their cause. As institutions, churches were quite timid. And many abolitionists became so caught up in the antislavery cause they gradually they substituted the cause for Christ. They experienced a lifetime of frustration and the final victory - by war - dealt a hard blow to Finney's optimistic theology. Faith linked too closely to a cause, and without an adequate respect for the gravity of sin, is vulnerable.

"The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church," wrote Tertullian, but martyrdom takes discernment and courage. Bonhoeffer and Luther were extremists. Peace generally goes with purity (though not always).

You do not choose extremism because you admire its tactics; you choose extremism because you feel you have no choice. For each of us, a time and an issue may come that calls us to extremes. Haunted by the ambiguity of the situation, mindful of the costs, I pray that I will hear and heed that call.

"The Bible and Abortion"

Exodus 21:22

Bible study:

"THE BIBLE AND ABORTION"

I. The Old Testament and abortion.

A. Punishment for death of unborn child. Exodus 21:22-25

B. Individual consciousness before birth.

C. Fetuses are ultimately creations of God, not humans.

II. New Testament and abortion.

A. John the Baptist had a consciousness in the womb that is

B. Holy Spirit came on Mary at conception, not at birth. Matt 1:20

C. Why is New Testament silent on actual practice of abortion?

III. The Humanistic basis of abortion.

IV. Christians and Extra-Legal movements. (Operation Rescue)

A. The Bible teaches that human government is not the highest

B. Extra-legal movements have long tradition among Christians.

C. Extra-legal methods raise disturbing questions.

V. Christians and compassion.

A. Abortion is a singularly divisive issue.

B. Even if morally wrong, Christians must love those who disagree

C. Opposition to abortion is only one aspect of the struggle.

[filed under c:\pcout.wrk\biblestu\abortion.pco]

#2416

*

from Evening Bible Study · Abortion.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Choose Life

John 10:10

Sermon for Sanctity Sunday, 1993.

Deuteronomy 30:15-20

===========

CHOOSE LIFE

===========

I. The certainty of life and death.

A. Life and death issues are at the cutting edge of our society.

B. From extraordinary measures, to ordinary, to none, to positive

action to destroy unwanted life.

II. How much is your life worth?

A. We all have some basic worth.

B. World says we are worthwhile due to what we produce or experience.

C. Bible says we are valuable because made makes us so. Luke 12:24

III. When does life start?

A. The frontiers of science.

B. Dilemma of abortion faces this question head on.

IV. When does our life end?

A. Most families will face this question intimately.

B. The definition of death. Hebrews 9:27

C. Promoting death, providing life, or prolonging death?

V. Choose life. Deut 30:15ff

A. Life must be given the preference.

B. How long have you lived? REALLY lived? John 10:10

#2417

*

Justifiable Abortion

The unpredictableness of life (and abortion) shown by story of Beethoven:

The young woman lost her father early in life. She married only to have her husband pass away soon after. She remarried, then her mother died within the year. She was never seen to laugh. She was continually pregnant and gave birth to seven children. Four of them died as infants or toddlers. They were born so frequently that when one died, the next one took the same name. The surviving children all bore the scars of smallpox. After the birth of her seventh child, she herself died from tuberculosis.

Before she died the lingering death of tuberculosis, her husband became an alcoholic. He drank up all their money and at one point she had to sell her clothes to buy food. He lost his job, and drank even more. He was cruel and abusive to his children, and the little ones were often seen crying by neighbors. When the oldest became an adolescent, it became his job to bail the father out of the local drunk-tank.

This son had almost no formal education and never learned even simple arithmetic. At an early age he contracted a social disease. (syphilis) At age 32 he was completely deaf. Chronic depression and paranoia robbed him of most of his friends. He never married and had no children. After months of suffering and pain, he died from pneumonia and congestive heart failure.

If his mother had wanted to terminate this pregnancy to spare him all this, would she have been justified?

(Congratulations, you just killed Ludwig von Beethoven!)

_________________________________________________

Another version from Chick Publications:

http://www.chick.com/bc/1999/abortion.asp Issue Date: January/February 1999

Would You Consider Abortion in These Four Situations?

1. There is a preacher and wife who are very, very poor. They already have 14 kids. Now she finds out she is pregnant with her 15th. They are living in tremendous poverty. Considering their poverty and the excessive world population, would you consider recommending abortion?

2. The father is sick with sniffles, the mother has TB. They have 4 children. The first is blind, the second is dead. The third is deaf and the fourth has TB. The mother finds she is pregnant again. Given the extreme situation, would you recommend abortion?

3. A white man raped a 13-year-old black girl and she got pregnant. If you were her parents, would you consider recommending abortion?

4. A teenage girl is pregnant. She is not married. Her fiancee is not the father of the baby, and he is very upset. Would you recommend an abortion?

If you have answered "yes" to any of these situations:

In the first case you would have killed John Wesley, one of the great evangelists of the 18th century.

In the second case, you would have killed Beethoven.

In the third case you would have killed Ethel Waters, the great black gospel singer.

In the fourth case you would have recommended the murder of Jesus Christ.

With U.S. abortion deaths topping 30 million, only God knows what we have sacrificed in lost human talent and creativity.

_____________________________

Version by Roddy Chestnut:

A professor at the UCLA Medical School asked his students this question: "Here is the family history: The father has syphilis. The mother has TB. They already have had four children. The first is blind. The second has died. The third is deaf. The fourth has TB. The mother is pregnant. The parents are willing to have an abortion if you decide they should. What do you think?" Most of the students decided on abortion. "Congratulations," said the professor. "You have just murdered Beethoven!" Nothing is so final as murder, even when it is done very early in life.

#2418

*

from (Various Biographies Of Beethoven) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database life

Abortion: What Is the Bible Truth?

Luke 1:44

Pamphlet giving Biblical data for opposing abortion. Interestingly, Exodus 21:22 is interpreted as miscarriage rather than premature (and alive) birth.

1. Known in the womb.

2. The dignity and sacredness of life.

3. God will defind the fatherless.

4. What shall we then do?

5. How to answer unbelievers. Their questions:

a. Abortion is a woman's right.

b. A fetus is only a blob of tissue.

c. A person has a right to be loved.

d. It's the best way to take care of a mistake.

e. Pregnancy is only a biological process.

f. God understands there may be no other way out.

g. If abortion is murder, why doesn't God stop it?

from Pamphlet · David Alsobrook via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database value of life

Bumper Sticker Baby

Acts 7:26

Many have seen bumper stickers with pro-life messages - these help to educate and perhaps help some to choose life instead of abortion.

This summer (1993), a baby was saved with the aid of a bumper sticker when a young couple on a motorcycle stopped a motorist to ask for directions to a certain “hospital.” The driver of the car quickly realized that the couple was headed for a local abortion center.

The pro-life driver prayed with the young couple and persuaded them to reconsider. He and his companion offered them any assistance, and were able to loan them an urgently-needed $300.00. They exchanged phone numbers and the young couple promised to return the money.

Several weeks later the pro-lifers were contacted by the girl’s father, who returned the loan with gratitude that the life of his grandchild had been spared.

After serious difficulties, the family, including the preborn baby’s father, was able to reconcile and build a new relationship. Our pro-life motorists will be witnessing the christening of the child.

Ironically, the bumper sticker that helped save the child’s life was not a pro-life bumper sticker, but a Harley-Davidson motorcycle bumper sticker! This sticker attracted the attention of the motorcyclists when they needed directions. The child’s life was saved indirectly through the spirit of brotherhood that exists between bikers.

Pro-life bumper stickers are not the only stickers that help save lives!

from News Alert, Newsletter Of New Jersey Right To Life via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Beyond Politics: A More Effective Way To Transform Our Nation

Acts 4:19

We must be careful about the trend to make America "Christian" through moral reform. "When most advocates call for a Christian America, they mean a nation whose laws and general standards of behavior do not offend moral principles as Christians understand them. But by stressing moral behavior, the 'Christian' in 'Christian America' suggest that Christianity is more about behavior than faith, more about works than grace. To reduce the adjective 'Christian' to label mere lawfulness represents a serious compromise of the gospel." Changing minds, not laws, is the key to national renewal.

Christian fanatics like Paul Hill believe they are obeying the Biblical injunction to do justice, but Christians must consider the relationship between cultural values and civil law.

1. Promote the general welfare of society by loving our neighbors.

In the two great commands are the reasons for involvement in the

culture beyond the Church. It is love, not the lure of power, that

motivates the Christian action in society. We can share these goals

with non-believers. Submission to Christ can only come by the work of

the Spirit, not by legal or political coercion. Our society will

always be "mixed" until Jesus returns.

2. Political involvement has limits. It is better to shape the culture.

Women seek abortions because our culture has conditioned them to

accept it, not because laws are liberal.

3. Servants, not rulers.

Christians cannot "take back America" because we never had it.

America has been hospitable to the Church, often because the Church

has not been prophetic. In the end, we have on this earth no abiding

city. What we do have is a duty to love God and neighbor. The crisis

that has occasioned the call for a Christian America is in part a

fault of the negligence of the Church - not simply its political

indifference, but its ignoring the signs of the times, the way the

cultural winds have been blowing for centuries.

'Hell House' Kits Selling Nationally

Job 7:13

An Arvada, Colorado, Assemblies of God church that received national media attention last Halloween for its gruesome HELL HOUSE, is selling kits to churches around the country that want to duplicate the grizzly dramatization.

Hell House was criticized for its gory depictions of an abortion, a homosexual dying of AIDS, drunken driving, teen suicide, and hell. Critics, including the Colorado Council of Churches, condemned the scare tactics used in the presentation and the literal demonization of homosexuals and abortionists.

Keenan Roberts, youth pastor and director of Abundant Life Christian Center’s Hell House, says the complaints are misdirected. “It’s Romans 6:23 in contemporary packaging. ‘The wages of sin is death,’” he says. Roberts, 30, developed an annual Hell House in Roswell, New Mexico, before moving to Denver.

Charging $5 for admission, the church made a $17,000 profit in last year’s five-night presentation. This year, it is extending the run to 16 nights. Roberts says the church grew by 25 percent after last Halloween.

The 500-member church is selling Hell House kits for $149. Buyers get a 263- page manual, a video of the Denver Hell House, and a tape or compact disc with sound effects. The manual includes everything from a script to prop advice, including, “Do your very best to buy or purchase a meat product that will resemble as much as possible pieces of a baby that are being placed in the glass bowl for all to see.”

So far, the church has sold 60 kits, which it spent $10,000 to produce.

~~~~~~~~~~

COPYRIGHT(C) 1996 BY CHRISTIANITY TODAY, INC/CHRISTIANITY TODAY MAGAZINE. — OCT. 7, 1996, VOL. 40, NO. 2, PAGE 87A

from Online Christianity Today (America Online) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database fear

How To Go Extinct

Ancient parallels with abortion: The new Natural History Museum in New York City has a fossil of a dinosaur with baby bones in its stomach. It is not giving birth, but eating its kids. Note that it is now extinct!

from (Museum Of Natural History, New York City) · (From personal experience) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Trust God, Not Doctors

Mark 16:1

The two parents watched the screen anxiously and with awe. The head appeared. The arms twitched. Then the feet wiggled -- the feet of their 18-week-old baby.

For Lee and Dena Smith, the day -- April 10, 1997 -- and the unborn child were answers to years of praying. Seven to be exact. The ultrasound technician could sense their excitement and smiled kindly as she cheerfully chatted about each new discovery.

Then silence.

As the second anniversary of that day approaches, Lee talks about the day as if it were yesterday.

Unnerved by the sudden stillness, Lee tentatively asked what was wrong. No answer. Lee watched the technician scan the spine and brain stem. He asked again.

“I do see a problem,” said the technician. “And the doctor needs to look at it before I tell you what I think.”

The doctor looked grim. He compassionately, yet firmly, told the tragic news: Their child had an incomplete formation of its spine -- a birth defect known as spina bifida. Accompanying this rare abnormality was hydrocephalus -- an abnormal increase in spinal fluid in the head cavity which leaves no room for brain development.

This neural tube defect had dashed the Smiths’ hopes for a child, at least a healthy one.

More tests at a research hospital revealed a grave situation.

Doctors offered no hope, explaining the baby would die in utero due to the fluid build-up. If, by a slim chance, the child lived, she would exist in a mentally vegetative state, totally paralyzed.

“Really the only option for you is to terminate the pregnancy now,” said one doctor. The Smiths were devastated.

“I remember going to the doctor’s office the first time. I thought that this is what Abraham must have felt like when the child of his faith was in the womb of Sarah,” recalled Lee, a master of divinity student at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Ky. “And now, having this news, I wondered if I may have felt like Abraham did when God said to sacrifice Isaac.”

The choice was clear according to the doctor. Nothing within human rationale justified carrying the baby to term.

But, something in the Smith’s faith said, “Let God have his way. If stillbirth was required, then the Lord would give the grace to endure that.”

So Lee and Dena agreed to wait. Their decision shocked the doctor. “The doctor acted like we were absolutely foolish,” said Lee, a native of Raleigh, N.C. “He was short with us and very uncompassionate.”

“‘Well, if you’re determined to do that, I’ll see you in a month,’“ the doctor said condescendingly, Lee recalled. “‘In a month you’ll see that the hydrocephalus has continued to worsen. It will not go away. It will continue to build up until the child’s head cavity explodes in the womb.’“

When the Smiths returned home, Lee called everyone he knew -- the deacons in the church where he pastored, his family, his friends. The Smiths’ request was simple and earnest: They did not care whether the child was mentally or physically handicapped, they wanted a child -- a life.

Church members began to pray. And they instructed Lee to take that Sunday off. “No, I want to preach,” Lee said.

He preached from Matthew 14, which tells of Jesus calming both the storm and the fears of his disciples. He is a “God of our storms,” Lee said.

During the altar call, many came to pray. Overcome with emotion, Lee and Dena left and went home. The congregation stayed, petitioning God long into the afternoon.

The following month seemed to last forever.

“During that time we just prayed, prayed and prayed. And the Scripture that came to my mind is in the James 5:16b, which reads, ‘The fervent prayer of a righteous man accomplishes much.’ I began to hold to that Scripture,” Lee said.

The Lord also spoke to Dena that month. She read a book about the women approaching Jesus’ tomb to anoint his body. On the way to the tomb, with despairing hearts, the women had no clue that the stone was rolled away. They were in their “grief journey.” But when they arrived, a miracle had happened.

“I don’t know if God can do this in my situation or not. I don’t know if this is my wishful thinking,” Dena said at the time. “But I feel that the Spirit of God is saying to me, ‘You’re in your grief journey, but the work is already accomplished. The stone has been rolled away.’“

She believed it, and Lee believed it as well.

“It was a comforting sense of the Spirit of God, saying, ‘You don’t know it yet, but I’ve already dealt with this problem,’“ Lee said.

The day for the follow-up exams finally came.

As the doomsaying doctor began the ultra-sound, Lee noticed something different. A full spine. Brain tissue developing. And no fluid.

The doctor didn’t say a word. After about 20 minutes of testing, he turned the machine off. “You’re child is fine,” he said bluntly.

“I don’t know what to say about it. The spine is fully developed. The ventricles of the brain where hydrocephalus builds up are normal size. I don’t have an explanation for how this happened,” the doctor said.

“Let me explain it to you,” Lee said, reciting James 5.

By that time word had spread, and a crowd had gathered. “I announced that continued fervent prayer could reverse what in the scientific realm doctors would classify as a hopeless case,” Lee said.

Lee had another word for the doctor: “If there is one-in-a-million chance for a natural remedy, not to mention supernatural intervention, doctors shouldn’t tell people there’s no hope. That one-in-a million might be my child.”

On Sept. 12, 1997, the one-in-a-million Alison Hayley Smith came into the world.

“She’s doing great,” Lee said.

Since then, Lee has shared this miracle in a dozen churches, incorporating the story into his sermon on Matthew 14, “The God of our Storms.”

God has used Alison’s story to minister to others swirling in the hurricanes of life, Lee said. Following one service, a lady whose baby had the same condition approached Lee.

“I encouraged her that a handicapped life was better that no life,” Lee said. “Sometimes God chooses to heal, and sometimes he doesn’t. When he doesn’t, he’s still the same God. And, the God of all comfort makes himself available, and his grace is sufficient.”

The Smiths view their storm to be like that of Job. “You almost want to say, ‘Lord, why did you put me through that month of hell if you were going to heal the child?’ Well, for the same reason he put those disciples through that long night of toil upon the sea of Galilee in Matthew 14 -- as a faith- building tool.

“No matter how dire the news is, I don’t believe there’s ever a hopeless situation. There’s always hope in the gospel,” Lee said. “God is able to do abundantly more than we could ever ask or think.”

Let Him Kill Me Instead

Comment by Cardinal John O'Connor following abortion clinic murders:

"If anyone has an urge to kill an abortionist, let him kill me instead. That's about as clearly as I can renounce such madness."

from Leadership · Cardinal John O'connor via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database violenceabortion

Clubbing Rats

Luke 12:6

Clubbing rats versus bashing babies! Frank Balun, a New Jersey gardener in his 70th year, was issued two summons - each carrying a penalty of up to 6 months in jail and $1,250 in fines - for the terrible crime of killing ... A RAT! The rat had been eating his tomato plants and he trapped him. Since the varmint was still kicking, Balun wrapped a newspaper around a broom handle and clubbed it to death. Lee Bernstein, an Associated Humane Societies executive director, issued the summonses and stood by his action even after two prosecutors (both county and city) said the charges should be dismissed. County Prosecutor Andrew Ruotolo, Jr., noted that Balun was a World War II veteran who "doesn't have to be a rat martyr," adding that the charges were "beneath the legal process."

Bernstein, probably because the national publicity made him appear like an idiot, said his summonses did not result from "the fact the animal was killed," but that "a trapped animal that could not escape was mutilated and died a horrible death."

Is that so? And how many innocent babies have died by brutal abortions?

#3525

*

from Biblical Evangelist, Incidents And Illustrations · Dr. Robert Sumner via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Forgiveness For Abortion Helped 'Bricks Fall Away'

Luke 1:44

April 19, 1994, marked a very special day for my husband, Kurt, and me. Amidst tremendous love and joy, I gave birth to our son, Christian Mel Jeremiah Birky. As we saw our son for the first time and held him in our arms, we were overwhelmed with emotion -- elated happiness and heart-wrenching pain.

Feelings of deep-seated guilt and sadness swept over me as I thought of the impact of the decision we'd made eight years earlier. Kurt and I had just finished our freshman year of college. We had just begun to date. Yet we made a mistake and I became pregnant.

My mind filled with panic. How could we tell our parents I was pregnant? How could I tell my parents I'd had sex? How would we finish college? How can we support ourselves and a baby? It's not time -- we just met.

At a local pregnancy center, I tearfully told the counselor I honestly didn't see how we could have this baby. The counselor asked about adoption, but I said we couldn't live with ourselves, knowing that a baby we had created from our love was out there somewhere, never knowing where or with whom. She nodded and explained that an abortion could be arranged.

She told us nothing about the "tissue" the doctor would be "removing" -- that it already had eyes, toes, a nose, fingers and even fingerprints. With very little discussion and no prayer, we scheduled the appointment.

Abortions cannot be performed before the eighth week -- the fetus must have time to develop so it can be pieced back together after it has been ripped apart and removed to make certain no part of the "tissue" is left inside the uterus to cause infection. So, for five agonizing weeks, I desperately hoped my parents wouldn't notice how tired and sick I was. I shrank from any baby brought within 20 feet of me.

We had been informed there might be protesters at the clinic when we arrived. My heart raced! Someone would see us go inside? Someone might try to stop us? Why would those people try to torment me for doing something that's completely legal? Relief washed over me that day in August when there was no one on the steps of the abortion clinic when Kurt and I walked up.

During the following years of my darkness, I have wondered a million times whether we would have turned away had someone only made us aware of the consequences. Because Kurt and I had both been raised in Christian homes, we had a small inkling of the power of Jesus Christ. However, we -- and others -- completely left him out of this experience.

The abortion was painful physically as well as emotionally. I remember every detail of the room I was in and the nurse who held my hand. I can even remember the color of the calico-patterned fabric stitched over the jars where the parts of my baby were collected.

Afterward, I kept expecting the medical staff to sit Kurt and me down and tell us that we shouldn't be having sex. Instead, they sent us on our way with a little brown bag filled with a three-month supply of birth control pills.

The immediate sense of relief the abortion provided faded quickly, only to be replaced by lingering feelings of guilt, depression, rage and worthlessness. Like many women who have had abortions, I experienced a physical pain in my arms so intense that sometimes I could barely lift them. They ached and felt so empty.

Kurt and I tried to gloss over what happened. But when Kurt met Andy Wineman, a leader for Campus Crusade for Christ, the Lord began to work in our hearts. Andy literally beamed with the love of Christ. "It was through Andy's gentle diligence in sharing the difference between having a religion and having a relationship with Jesus that I began to be convicted of the past. I made a life-changing decision to give my life completely over to Jesus," Kurt says.

Not long after that, Kurt shared with me he could no longer ask for forgiveness from God for something he knew we would do again. With that one sentence, Kurt went from being my "boyfriend" to being the man I was going to honor the rest of my life. With God's help, we made the decision to remain abstinent for the next three years, until our wedding night.

However, we were not fully convicted of what we had done until we settled in Los Angeles following our graduation and wedding. Our pastor, Tom Ciznar, frequently spoke about abortion, often to a hostile crowd at church. It was agonizing to sit in the pew and listen to him. Every cell in my body wanted to run away as far and as fast as I could. But I had to sit there and pretend that just hearing the dreaded word didn't make me panic. It is incredibly difficult to admit you paid someone to kill your child, so I tried rationalizing arguments for the pro-choice movement.

At one point, pastor Ciznar shared his testimony with us. While counseling a young pregnant girl who had no one to support her or her baby, he had done as he had been taught -- he advised her to have an abortion. Bravely, the young woman looked him in the eye and said, "Pastor, I already made one mistake. I'm not going to make another."

Later that year she came back to visit him with her baby. Seeing the very child he had advised her to abort changed his life forever. Tom Ciznar has since become a leader in the pro-life movement in southern California.

One Sunday a woman from a local pregnancy assistance clinic came to church to make an announcement about a fund-raiser. Before the congregation she sang a song she had written to her aborted child. For those five minutes I writhed inside my skin in sheer agony and bitterness. But those five minutes also marked the beginning of my healing.

That day I cried for hours. Kurt held me tenderly and rocked me. But when I asked him why people like that had to be so mean, he took a deep breath and responded, "I think they're right."

My pulse raced. What??

Kurt proceeded to tell me he had been reading the Bible on the subject. He explained that even though we'd asked God to forgive us for this sin, we weren't really repenting. Ours became an empty gesture to God.

That day, for the first time, I felt the full weight of what Kurt and I had done. Like a brick wall on my shoulders, it had been crushing me. Yet by our taking that first step to condemn our sin, a few of the bricks fell away.

We began to attend pro-life groups. More bricks fell. I applied for a position at the Right to Life League and, for the first time in seven years, shared the truth of my past with the woman who interviewed me. Still more bricks came tumbling down. In the midst of my PACE (post-abortion counseling and education) Bible study, God led Kurt and me to tell our families the truth. So we wrote a letter.

As each call came in from our immediate family members, grieving yet sharing their love and support for our repentance, I was finally able to stand up straight in the eyes of people.

However, I still had to take the last and most important step. I had to accept the clean slate Jesus Christ offered me -- and believe it. In my mind I knew about forgiveness, but I had trouble feeling it in my heart. Kurt often soothed me with the knowledge that Jesus can and does forgive any sin. Today, God has given us his total peace and wholeness through the mercy of Jesus Christ and his ultimate sacrifice.

Confessing and repenting of this sin before our Holy God is not an easy road, but I know now it is the only path that leads to peace and wholeness.

Through PACE and through sharing God's promise of restoration with others, my wound has become a scar. I now use that scar and my knowledge of the deception and lies surrounding abortion to try to save others from the pain and darkness that follows abortion. My scar offers proof of the powerful healing hand of Christ to other post-abortion women.

As Kurt and I revel in the development of our beautiful son, Christian, we can't help but feel we should have already experienced this wonder of birth, instead of the nightmare of death. For us, our son represents the goodness of God's unfathomable grace.

The Jeremiah in Christian's name is a reminder to us -- and Christian -- of our first child, whom we never want to forget. The Bible testifies to the importance of all children in the eyes of God: "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart" (Jer. 1:5).

==================

Birky is director of education for the Right to Life League of Southern California in Pasadena. This article first appeared in the January 1996 issue of Experiencing God magazine, published by the Baptist Sunday School Board.

Copyright (c) 1996 Baptist Press RNbp6112mrjB6112f6116

#3529

*

from Online Christianity Today (America Online) · Margaret & Kurt Birky via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database forgivenessguiltsexabstinence

Life In the Balance: Are We Targeting the Weak?

Zechariah 2

A young man named Doug made a startling announcement to a friend. “When I get married,” he said, “I hope that my wife and I will have a child with Down syndrome.”

The woman Doug told this to-Joni Eareckson Tada-chalked it up to youthful idealism. But as she writes in her new book, Life in the Balance, Doug meant every word. He’d spent a lot of time with children with Down Syndrome, and witnessed “an unusual joy and guilelessness” in them. And it was clear that these children were a blessing to their parents.

And yet, children with Down Syndrome are among the most “at-risk” when it comes to survival-not from their chromosomal abnormalities, but from doctors and scientists who are determined to wipe them out.

As Joni recalls, the National Council on Disability was shocked when NIH suggested in 1988 that abortion of Down Syndrome children be considered a “disability prevention strategy.”

The Disability Council sent the report back to NIH for revision. But here we are 22 years later, and this “strategy” has been fully embraced. In 2007, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists began recommending that ALL pregnant women, not just older ones, have their babies tested for Down Syndrome-you know what that meant.

Strategies like this come out of a worldview that embraces eugenics, a word that means “good genes.” It’s a view that says humans are not acceptable unless they are perfect -- healthy, smart, and beautiful.

We saw the extreme result of this movement in Nazi Germany, where the mentally ill and disabled were murdered in order to “cleanse” society of those liable to be a burden.

But the Bible gives us a different view of so-called “defective” people. Here, we learn, as Joni writes, that all humans are created in the image of God, with intrinsic value. In fact, she says, “the image of God is especially mirrored in the weak” and disabled.

Remember the story in Genesis of Jacob wrestling with the man of God, and wrenching his hip out of its socket? We are told that limped away because of his hip injury. In effect, he became disabled.

This physical wound was “meant to remind Jacob of his spiritual brokenness,” Joni writes. “He could no longer feign moral strength as he limped through life with his new physical disability.”

God intentionally brings brokenness and weakness to those he loves, using them for his sovereign purposes, Joni says. “Broken, weak people display the image of God most convincingly when they lean on him for strength moment by moment.”

As for those who would harm the disabled, the weak, or the elderly-or weed them out-verses like Zechariah 2: 8 and 9 have a warning for them: “Whoever touches [the afflicted’ touches the apple of [my] eye, and I will surely raise my hand against them.”

I hope you’ll read Joni’s wonderful new book, Life in the Balance, We’ve got it for you at our bookstore at BreakPoint.org. And while you’re there, pick up a copy of my daughter’s book Dancing with Max, the wonderful story of her autistic son.

You’ll learn more from these books about how to make sense of modern debates about life. Joni will teach you how to fight on behalf of those who are quietly being targeted for extermination. I recommend it highly.

________

Copyright (c) 2010 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

[Original illustration at this number was deleted for being obsolete]

from BreakPoint Commentary · Chuck Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database abortionhandicap

Our God of Second Chances

Mark 9:37

Steve Arterburn is a spokesman for Minrith-Meier Clinics and is heard on national Christian radio stations. He attended Baylor University and then went on to seminary. Since he is a "personality" he was asked to speak at the Baylor University chapel. Instead of a safe and inspiring talk, he confessed his personal sin. When he had attended Baylor he had gotten his girlfriend pregnant. He saw his whole future at stake, and so paid for her to have an abortion. He didn't think much about it in the coming years, but began to have stress-related illnesses which he eventually attributed to guilt over the incident.

The former girlfriend called him and told him she had heard about his chapel talk. He stressed that he had not mentioned her by name but that wasn't her concern. She said he was not being completely honest. He hadn't just paid for the abortion, but had pressured her to kill the child she wanted to have. His pressure was subtle but effective - don't expect me to be there for you if you have this child.

God is a God of second chances, of restoration. Everything that happens has its reason, and God has a plan for us. Steve got married in California only to discover that he and his wife were an infertile couple. He felt abandoned by God. Some of his Christian friends suggested that this was God's punishment for his past sin. This angered him, but he does not see God as a vindictive punisher.

Later, Steve told his publisher about his situation and this man mentioned that he knew of a 16-year-old Christian couple who had gotten pregnant out of wedlock but refused to abort it. Instead they were looking for a Christian family to adopt it. It struck Steve that this couple was far more courageous than he had been. He and his wife received the child in a hotel room. The baby was put in his arms first. She is now a beautiful young girl. God had given him what he had destroyed years ago.

The Bible and Abortion

Luke 1:41

"THE BIBLE AND ABORTION"

I. The Old Testament and abortion.

A. Punishment for death of unborn child. Exodus 21:22-25

1) Option #1: Serious injury concerns child.

a) Lesser injury to premature child involves a fine.

b) Death involves capital punishment.

c) Therefore a punishment for (unintended) abortion.

2) Option #2: Serious injury involves mother only.

a) Only death of mother leads to capital punishment.

b) Death of child leads to a fine, therefore not on same

level as murder.

c) Other laws in Old Testament may hint at different values

for different lives, ie., men vs. women, slave vs. free.

B. Individual consciousness before birth.

1) Jeremiah was called to be a prophet before birth. (In fact,

before conception.) Jeremiah 1:5

C. Fetuses are ultimately creations of God, not humans.

1) He knits us in our mother's womb. Job 31:15;

Psalm 139:13-16; Isaiah 44:1

2) To die in the mother's womb is a real death (not just a loss

of mother's tissue.) Jeremiah 20:17 (cf. Job 3:11-16)

II. New Testament and abortion.

A. John the Baptist had a consciousness in the womb that is

independent of his mother. Luke 1:41,45

B. Holy Spirit came on Mary at conception, not at birth. Matt 1:20

C. Why is New Testament silent on actual practice of abortion?

1) Abortion was widespread among Romans and Greeks.

a) Infanticide was even more common.

2) Some argue the New Testament is silent because the writers

considered it a matter of individual choice.

3) More likely, it is silent because Jews were united against

abortion and it had not become an issue in the church.

a) The N.T. tends to speak on issues that are "hot," and

does not cover every ethical issue.

b) When abortion did become an issue, the early Church was

firmly opposed to it.

1> Abortion is condemned in the Didache, Gospel of Peter,

and other early writings (second century A.D.).

2> Christians took in children who were abandoned.

III. The Humanistic basis of abortion.

A. The primary motive for the acceptance of abortion is our society's

preference of autonomy (freedom) over responsibility.

B. Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was a

Malthusian socialist who regarded poor people as "human weeds"

to be sterilized whenever possible. She felt that "the most

merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant

members is to kill it." She was closely connected with the

"race purification" scientists of the Nazi party, being

convinced the "inferior races" were a "menace to civilization."

C. "Right to choose" or "right to life"?

1) The "right to choose" only makes sense if fetuses are merely

the mother's tissue. If fetuses are in any sense human

then the right to life must take precedence over the

right to choose.

2) "Roe vs. Wade" takes an in-between stance, giving preference

to mother's choice during first 3 months, but preference

to the fetus in the last 3 months.

IV. Christians and Extra-Legal movements. (Operation Rescue)

A. The Bible teaches that human government is not the highest

authority -- God is.

1) The Hebrew midwives disobeyed Pharaoh's command and spared the

Jewish babies. Exodus 1:16-17

2) Government has God's authority, but only so long as it

encourages what is good and punishes evil. Romans 13

3) Government has a tendency toward usurping God's authority

and persecuting His people. Rev. 13

B. Extra-legal movements have a long tradition among American

Christians.

1) Abolition of slavery. 1860's

a) Abolitionists openly defied laws, saying freedom was a

higher law.

b) Abolitionists were also despised by general population.

2) Civil Rights movement. 1960's

a) Protests were non-violent but also non-legal, such as

sit-ins and illegal rallies.

b) Leaders such as Martin Luther King appealed to a higher

moral code or consciousness among white Americans.

C. Extra-legal methods raise disturbing questions.

1) Should Christians force their views on others?

2) If abortion is morally wrong, is bombing an abortion clinic

morally correct?

V. Christians and compassion.

A. Abortion is a singularly divisive issue.

B. Christians must stand up for the rights of the weak. Psalm 82:3,4

1) If we do not, God will hold us accountable. Proverbs 24:11-12

C. Even if morally wrong, Christians must love those who disagree

and offer forgiveness.

D. Opposition to abortion is only one aspect of the struggle;

believers must also provide alternatives that enhance life.

(Originally written January 19, 1993)

from Study Outline · Rev. David Holwick (C:\pcout.wrk\biblestu\abortion.pco) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database value of lifepro lifechoice

Testimony of Heather Holmes

Ephesians 1:15

Heather Holmes gave the following testimony at Friendship Pregnancy Center's banquet on October 11, 1996. Heather is a volunteer who lives in Towaco, N.J., and attends Grace Bible Church in Pompton Plains, N.J.

__________

Good Evening. Last year was my very first Friendship banquet. Of course, I was late and we sat way in the back at Table 78. If anybody was to tell me then that I'd be up here speaking I would have told them they were crazy. What a difference a year makes!

I became a Christian in 1993 and I really didn't need much convincing that I was in need of a Savior. I had carried around the sin of abortion with me for about ten years and never told anyone. It wasn't spoken of - I just kept it hidden in my heart. I was very happy to leave it at the foot of the cross, except I don't think I really left it there.

Two years later I was at a health fair in Wayne and I saw the pregnancy center's booth and took some information. When I found out that it was a Christian organization I said, 'Ah, the Lord has led me here to reach out and help some young girls. I'm going to tell them not to do what I did.' So I started my training to be a counselor at Friendship. At the time I was pregnant with my son, Timothy (I also have a 4-year old daughter, Alexandra) and at home things were really starting to come to a head. I was angry a lot and didn't know why. I didn't have a lot of patience. Sometimes I felt numb, like I didn't have any emotion at all, and other times I was depressed and didn't know why.

Then I met Ann Marie [Van Sickle, PACE coordinator] when she came to our counselor training to tell us about the PACE [Post-Abortion Information & Education] program. I toyed with the idea of trying to get some help but never followed-up on it. Then I got a really bad nightmare one night and it involved my son. I couldn't tell anybody about it but that's all I needed. 'Thank you, Lord, for only giving me one nightmare!'

The next morning I was on the phone with Beverly [Frutchey, client services director] and she had no idea that I was post-abortive. I didn't tell anybody because at that point shame, guilt and secrecy were a big part of my make-up. [After I told her I was post-abortive], Bev hooked me up with the PACE program - a wonderful program. It gives hope after abortion, an intense Bible study and a safe, non-judgmental environment. We could share with each other and mourn and grieve. It took me twelve long years to bring this to light.

I really believe Satan rejoices when you keep things like that in the dark because that's where he works best and has a stronghold. I believed every single one of his lies. When I was saved I knew I was saved in my head but I didn't feel it in my heart. I believed that I wasn't worthy of forgiveness and that I was a bad mom. Then through the group I began to see him for what he was - a liar - and I began to look up for help and started believing and seeing God through healthy, biblical eyes. I knew that Jesus died for every one of my sins - not just this or that sin - every single one. In Ephesians 1:15 it says that God loves me and He chose me in all wisdom and understanding. He knew every single thing about me, and He still loved me, no matter what! That's kind of amazing to me, but I hold on to that so tightly.

Today I have so much less stress in my life. I enjoy my children so much more fully. I'm not afraid that God will punish me by taking away one of my children. I know God loves me - He gave me a wonderful family, a wonderful husband. God graced me with a wonderful church full of supporters to help me also. I know now that my debt is unequivocally paid, and I really have left it at the foot of the cross. I'm enjoying my God-given, God-intended freedom through my salvation. I can tell you right now that I can feel it in my heart, and I never thought that was possible.

If there is anybody here who's feeling like I did last year ... maybe I'm talking to you. Call Friendship, call the PACE program. Reach out because I promise you you'll find healing.

I'd like to read you a couple verses that meant so much to me. They're from Psalm 116:1-9:

I love the Lord, for he heard my voice;

he heard my cry for mercy.

Because he turned His ear to me,

I will call on Him as long as I live.

The cords of death entangled me,

and the anguish of the grave came upon me,

I was overcome by trouble and sorrow.

Then I called on the name of the Lord:

"Oh Lord, save me!"

The Lord is gracious and righteous;

our God is full of compassion.

The Lord protects the simple-hearted;

when I was in great need He saved me.

Be at rest once more, 0 my soul

for the Lord has been good to you.

For you, 0 Lord, have delivered my soul from death,

my eyes from tears, my feet from stumbling,

That I may walk before the Lord in the land of the living.

#4315

*

from Heartbeat, The Quarterly Newsletter Of Friendship Pregnancy Centers · Heather Holmes via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database deliverancedeception

Life Unworthy of Life: Yesteryear Germans Would Be Proud

Even before the Nazi Party came to power, the doctors of Weimar Germany began to divide humanity into those who should live and those who should die. They developed the category of “life unworthy of life” in order to designate those whose infirmity, deformity, race or lifestyle rendered them subhuman in terms of rights.

Similarly, the eugenicists of the 20th century -- in America as well as in Europe -- divided humanity into the “fit” and the “unfit,” and called for more children from the fit, less from the unfit.

Now, word comes from London that a physician has used preimplantation genetic testing to allow a woman to become pregnant with a baby that is free of a breast cancer gene. In order to produce this baby, six embryos found to carry the gene were rejected.

As The Telegraph (London) explains:

“Only one other woman is believed to have become pregnant after undergoing the same screening technique, called pre-implantation diagnosis (PGD).

“Critics claim it is unethical because it means viable embryos are destroyed. There are also fears it could lead to the creation of ‘designer babies’ that are chosen for their looks or intelligence.

“The British woman said she felt she had to go through the invasive IVF treatment even though she and her husband are fertile in order to try and safeguard her child.”

The paper went so far as to label the child a “designer baby.” This is precisely what many ethicists fear. Viable human embryos were discarded because they were found to carry a genetic marker that involves a risk -- perhaps a significant risk -- of later disease.

Where does this stop? Proponents of the technology complain that using phrases like “designer baby” is unfair, since no current technology allows a parent to “order” a child complete with all chosen traits. But that complaint misses the point. The designation of any trait -- even the negative designation -- creates a designer baby. Someone has decided that some trait is unacceptable.

In this case it was a gene linked to cancer. What next? We already know that the vast majority of babies diagnosed with Down syndrome are now aborted. How long before there is a preimplantation screen for that syndrome? Couples are now screening embryos for gender. How long before athletic ability or earning potential is linked to a gene? Blond hair? Blue eyes?

The Weimar doctors would be proud. The doctors behind this new technology assure us that their only concern is the improvement of human health. So did the Weimar doctors and the eugenicists. Health can be used as an argument for destroying life, it seems.

The tragedy is that vast millions of couples would almost surely take advantage of this technology should it become more widely available. The end would justify the means, they would rationalize.

The laboratory is now a dangerous place for human embryos. They can be destroyed for stem cell research, frozen pending sale, and rejected after genetic testing. This points to a very sad reality -- there is now a search and destroy mission targeting human embryos considered unworthy and unwanted.

Life unworthy of life. Where have we heard that before?

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #6742]

Will We Lose the Culture War?: An Effective Battle Strategy

John 1:17

Have we lost the culture war? Many evangelicals seem to think so. Despite our best efforts, public morality is declining, while divorce, homosexuality, and abortion are continuing to rise.

Or are they?

The surprising news is that recent polls indicate a turn-around. An article in National Review reveals that, since 1981 the divorce rate is down 19 percent; since 1994 the birth rate for unmarried teens is down 7.5 percent; since 1990 abortion is down 15.3 percent; and since 1993 there's been a whopping 37 percent decrease in people on welfare. Even crime is down, despite a surge of teens in the crime-prone years.

What's more, a recent Wall Street Journal/NBC poll uncovered a startling change in attitudes: 84 percent of self-described conservatives say what's "important for society" today is to "promote respect for traditional values." Even more surprisingly, 33 percent of liberals agree.

People are finally realizing that the dominant worldviews fail to provide a basis for a safe and stable public order.

This represents a tremendous opportunity for Christians. Our culture is embroiled in nothing less than a clash of worldviews, and Christians must stop focusing on social issues one at a time. Instead, we must delve beneath the surface and identify the underlying principles, the broad worldviews, that give rise to social problems in the first place. Otherwise, we may win a few battles, but still lose the war.

Samuel Huntington of Harvard has said the world is divided not so much by geographical boundaries as by differences in ultimate beliefs-in worldviews. He is absolutely right. The task for us is to identify those worldviews, and to demonstrate that the Christian worldview is the only one that can be rationally defended.

Robert George of Princeton is a wonderful model. Last year Professor George debated abortion at a Convention of the American Political Science Association. His opponent was well-known deconstructionist Stanley Fish. In published articles, Fish had dismissed arguments AGAINST abortion as based on "religious conviction" alone, while suggesting that the case FOR abortion is based on "scientific facts."

But George argued that, on the contrary, what science supports is the pro-life view, by demonstrating that the fetus is fully human. Sonogram pictures show the unborn child responding to stimuli, and doctors are performing surgery on babies in the womb. Today the pro-life position can be supported by empirical evidence that is accessible to everyone.

Before the convention, George sent his paper to Stanley Fish, and when the debate opened, Fish shocked the assembled professors by throwing his paper on the table and announcing, "Professor George is right, and he is right to correct me. Today the pro-life position is supported by scientific evidence."

The audience sat in stunned silence.

Christianity cannot be dismissed as merely a private religious experience. Instead, it is the truth about all reality. And it can be supported by rational, empirical evidence open to everyone. That's why every Christian must learn to be an apologist, capable of comparing worldviews and discerning which are true and false.

Each of us must learn how to present Christianity as a worldview, supported by reason and evidence. And when we do, we'll discover that we can indeed win the culture war.

___________________________

Copyright (c) 1999 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

Considering Abortion

Mark 9:37

"A doctor asked God why he hasn't sent any person into the world who has the knowledge to cure AIDS, help world peace, or cure Cancer. God replied, "I did, but you aborted them."

Would you consider abortion in the following 4 situations?

1. There's a preacher and wife who are very, very poor. They already have 14

kids. Now she finds out she's pregnant with the 15th. They're living

in tremendous poverty. Considering their poverty and the excessive

world population, would you consider recommending she get an abortion?

2. The father is sick with sniffles and the mother has TB. They have four

children. The first is blind, the second is [?], third is deaf, fourth

has TB. She finds she's pregnant again. Given the extreme situation,

would you consider recommending abortion?

3. A white man raped a 13-year-old black girl and she got pregnant. If you

were her parents, would you consider recommending abortion?

4. A teenage girl is pregnant. She's not married. Her fiancé is not the

father of the baby, and he's very upset. Would you consider

recommending abortion?

SOLUTIONS:

* If you said "Yes" to the first case, you have just aborted John Wesley, one

of the great evangelists in the 19th century.*

* If you said "Yes" to the second case, you have aborted Beethoven.

* If you said "Yes" to the third case, you have aborted Ethel Waters, the great black gospel singer.

* If you said "Yes" to the fourth case, you have declared the murder of Jesus Christ. (Matthew 1:18-23).

from E-mail · Submitted by Sarah Holwick via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Tiny Tim

Job 3:20

It was a relatively calm day in my hospital's NICU (Neonatal Intensive Care Unit). Two other nurses and I were trying to have a conversation amid the customary sounds of ventilators and heart monitors. I was in mid-sentence when the shrill ring of the red emergency phone halted all conversation. "Come fast," the voice said urgently. "We need a neonatal nurse stat!"

Fear gripped my heart as I ran into the delivery room. Instantly, I knew the situation was critical. "What's happening here?" I asked.

"It's an 'oops abortion,' and now it's your problem!" responded one of the nurses. For us, an "oops abortion" meant the mother's due date was miscalculated, and the fetus survived the abortion procedure. A pediatrician was called to the scene. He ran by me with the fetus (now called a baby) in his hand and yelled in my direction, indicating he wanted me to follow him into the resuscitation room adjoining the delivery room. I looked into the bed of the warmer as I grabbed equipment. Before my eyes was a baby boy. A very, very tiny baby boy. The doctor and I immediately made an attempt at intubation (inserting a tube down the trachea from the mouth or nose of the infant to the tip of the lungs to ventilate, expand and oxygenate them). The doctor's effort at intubation failed, which further traumatized the baby. I glanced at the doctor and hesitantly asked, "Will you attempt intubation again?"

"You've got to be kidding," he replied. "It would be inhumane to attempt to intubate this poor little thing again. This infant will never survive."

"No, Doctor, I'm not kidding," I said, "and it's my job to ask."

The doctor softened for a moment. "I'm sorry, Sharon. I'm just angry. The mother doesn't want the inconvenience of a baby, so she comes to the hospital so she can pay somebody to get rid of it -- all neat and tidy. Then the whole thing gets messed up when the fetus has the audacity to survive. Then everybody takes it seriously, and they call the pediatrician, who's supposed to fix it or get rid of it." With anger in his voice, he went on, "Some lawyers will fight for the right to do whatever we want to our bodies, but watch out for what they will do when these abortions aren't so neat and tidy! A failed homicide -- and oops! Then all of a sudden everybody cares, and it's turned from a 'right' into a 'liability' that someone is blamed for!"

We looked at our pathetic little patient. He was lying in the fetal position in the wrong environment, trying to get air into underdeveloped lungs that couldn't do the job. In a calmer voice, the doctor said, "Okay, Nurse, I'm going back to the office. Keep him comfortable and let me know when it's over. I'm sorry about this. Call me if you need me. I know this is a hard one. If it helps, please know it's tough for me, too." Holding the baby's hand, I watched the doctor retreat and then glanced back at the infant before me. He was gasping for air. "Lord, help!" I prayed. Almost instinctively, I took the baby's vitals. His temperature was dangerously low. I pushed the warmer settings as high as they could go. His heart rate was about 180-200 beats per minute. I could count the beats by watching his little chest pulsate. I settled down a bit and began to focus on this tiny little person. He had no name, so I gave him one. Suddenly, I found myself speaking to the baby. "Tiny Tim, who are you? I am so sorry you weren't wanted. It's not your fault."

I placed my little finger in his hand, and he grasped it. As I watched him closely, I marveled that all the minute parts of a beautiful baby were present and functioning in spite of the onslaught. I touched his toes and discovered he was ticklish! He had a long torso and long legs. I wondered if he would have become a baseball player. Perhaps he would have been a teacher or doctor. Emotions swept over me as I thought of my friends who had been waiting and praying for years for a baby to adopt. I spoke aloud once again to the miniature baby. "They would have given you a loving and a happy home. Why would people destroy you before ever considering adoption? Ignorance is not bliss, is it, Tiny Tim?"

Hanging on meanwhile, Tim put his thumb into his mouth and sucked. I hoped that gave him comfort. I continued to talk to the baby. "I'm sorry, Tim. There are people who would risk their lives for a whale or an owl before they'd even blink about what just happened to you." Tiny Tim gasped, and his little chest heaved as if a truck were sitting on it. I took my stethoscope and listened to his tiny, pounding heart. At The moment it seemed easier to focus on physiology rather than on this baby's humanity.

He wet, and with that my mind took off again. Here was Tiny Tim with a whole set of kidneys, a bladder, and connecting tubes that functioned with a very complex system of chemistry. His plumbing was all working! I turned the overhead light up and Tim turned from it, in spite of eyelids that were fused together to protect his two precious little eyes. I thought about them. They would never see a sunset, a mother's smile or the wagging tail of a dog. I took his temperature again. It was dropping. He was gasping for air and continued to fight for life. I stroked him gently and began to sing:

"Jesus loves the little children, All the children of the world. Red and yellow, black and white, They are precious in His sight. Jesus loves the little children of the world."

A nurse walked in. "How's the mother?" I asked.

"Oh, she's fine. She's back in her room resting. The family said they don't want to see or hear about anything. They said, "Just take care of it." The nurse retreated with one last glance at the tiny patient. "For such a little person, he's sure putting up a big fight."

I looked at Tiny Tim and wondered if he knew that what he was fighting for so hard was life -- and I knew he was losing it. He was dying and his family was resting. Their words tormented me. Just take care of it! No muss and no fuss.

Then Tiny Tim moved and caught hold of my little finger. I let him hang on. I didn't want him to die without being touched and cared for. As I saw him struggle to breathe, I said, "It's okay, Tim. You can let go. You can go back to God."

His gasping started slowing down, but he still clung to my finger. I stroked the baby ever so slowly and watched him take his last breath. "Good-bye, Tiny Tim," I whispered. "You did matter to someone."

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Epilogue

A few years later, Sharon Dunsmore became the manager of a psychiatric unit. One day, Kathy, a young, severely depressed woman, came to see Sharon following an unsuccessful suicide attempt. As Sharon interviewed her, Kathy said she had gone through an abortion three years before, and she was having recurring nightmares. A baby was crying for help and kept calling her name. In her dreams, Kathy searched for the baby, but she could never find him or her. As Kathy gave the name of the hospital and the names of the doctors, a disturbing realization dawned on Sharon. Kathy was Tiny Tim's mother. Because of hospital regulations, she couldn't tell her what she knew.

Time passed. Sharon was no longer a nurse or a therapist. Kathy was no longer a psychiatric patient. They ran into each other at a restaurant, where Sharon gently unfolded the story that had been hidden for so long. Tears flowed as she gave Kathy the gift of answers. Her baby was touched and loved by a mother. He was given a name. He didn't die alone. He was sent back to a loving God.

As the visit neared an end, they held each other and wept. Sharon looked into Kathy's eyes and saw new strength and calm. There were scars, but she was beginning to heal. The nightmares were being put to rest. Sharon still lives with the haunting impact of this experience. A choice that was intended to be "no big deal" turned out to be a very big deal for everybody.

Sharon Dunsmore has Tiny Tim's story available in booklet form. For more information, write "Tiny Tim," P. O. Box 84, Smiths Creek, MI 48074-0084

*

The Denial Game: Running From the Moral Law

A few years ago, abortion advocate Naomi Wolf (famous of late as an advisor to Vice President Gore) let the cat out of the bag. She admitted that although feminists pretend not to know that fetuses are babies, in reality they do know. She confessed that abortion is real sin, and feminists have known it all along.

The problem is, she wants women to keep aborting. They can hold candlelight vigils at abortion facilities afterward, if they like, to show their sorrow. But you may ask: How could anyone hold such a cynical, callused view? The problem is that Naomi Wolf is in denial, too. She just pretends not to know that God will not be mocked.

In his book, The Revenge of Conscience, Jay Budziszewski reminds us that human beings have been playing the denial game ever since the Fall, in the Garden of Eden. To understand times like ours, we need to understand this fact. People sometimes feign ignorance of the moral facts, but they know more than they admit.

The Bible mentions five ways (apart from direct scriptural revelation) in which God has made His moral requirements known.

One is the witness of conscience. In Romans, Paul says that even pagans know God's moral law because it is "written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness." Sin comes not from ignorance but stubbornness, for they "suppress the truth."

Another is the witness of God-ward longing, In Acts we read that the Athenians built an altar to "the unknown god." At some level, they knew their idols could never save them -- but they had an intuition of a mysterious Holy One who could. This is a universal intuition, which tells us that we were made for God and not for ourselves.

Third is the witness of God's handiwork. Creation cries out about the Creator. Not only the heavens, but our bodies proclaim His eternal glory. Even hardened abortionists find it impossible to shut out completely the knowledge that they are destroying the image of God. Abortionist Warren Hern writes: "The sensations of dismemberment flow through the forceps like an electric current .... Some part of our cultural and perhaps even biological heritage recoils."

Next is the witness of the harvest. As the Bible warns, every sin is linked with consequences: Whatever we sow, we reap. We may pretend ignorance, as people pretend ignorance of the harvest of the sexual revolution. Yet there is a difference between playing dumb and really being dumb.

Last is the witness of our design. God makes some of his intentions plain just through the way he made us -- it's in the "blueprint." Our physical design informs us that man was made for woman, not for man, and our emotional design reminds us that children are not curses but gifts.

Ultimately, no one is ignorant of the moral law, no matter how much he may deny it. We know it from the forms of witness built into us by the Creator; and a good resource for learning more about this is Jay Budziszewski's new book, The Revenge of Conscience. Call us here at BreakPoint to find out how you can order a copy.

And whenever people try to play the denial game with you, tell them that denial is really just a kind of self-deception. Because God's law is written on our hearts.

___________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database conscience

Comparison with slavery

Slavery -- 1857: Although he may have a heart and a brain, and he may be a human biologically, a slave is not a legal person. The Dred Scott Decision by the U.S. Supreme Court has made that clear. A black man only becomes a legal person when he is set free. Before that time, we should not concern ourselves about him. He has no legal rights. If you think that slavery is wrong, then nobody is forcing you to be a slaveowner. Don't impose your morality on somebody else! A man has the right to decide what he wants to do with his own property. Isn't slavery really something merciful? After all, every black man has a right to be protected. Isn't it better never to be set free than to be sent unprepared and ill-equipped into a cruel world? (Spoken by someone already free.)

Abortion -- 1994: Although he may have a heart and a brain, and he may be a human biologically, a fetus is not a legal person. The Roe vs. Wade decision by the U.S. Supreme Court has made that clear. A baby only becomes a legal person when he is born. Before that time, we should not concern ourselves about him. He has no legal rights. If you think abortion is wrong, then nobody is forcing you to have one. Don't impose your morality on somebody else! A woman has the right to decide what she wants to do with her own body. Isn't abortion really something merciful? After all, every baby has a right to be wanted. Isn't it better never to be born than to be sent alone and unloved into a cruel world? (Spoken by someone already born.)

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database slavery

Equal rights for unborn

Here's a great bumper sticker opposing abortion. Publicizing the fact that half of the babies aborted are little girls, it reads: EQUAL RIGHTS FOR UNBORN WOMEN

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Something special about humans

We all know there's something special about human life. If a meteorite were to strike Antarctica and wipe out a few thousand penguins, we'd react differently than if it hit New York City. If we're driving down the road and a squirrel darts out in front of us and we run over it -- that's different than if a little kid did the same thing! Not what we're told by some in our society -- all species are equal; man not superior to dolphins, whales, or owls. That's why in Florida it's against the law to walk out on the beach and destroy turtle eggs, but it's not against the law to walk into an abortion clinic and destroy a human fetus.

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database life

What's the difference?

A mother stepped into the doctor's office carrying a bright, beautiful baby, only a year old. She told her family physician, "I want you to help me out of trouble. My baby is only one year old and I have conceived again, and I do not want to have children so close together." "What do you expect me to do?" asked the physician. "Oh, anything to get rid of it for me," she said. After thinking seriously for a moment, the doctor said, "I think I can suggest a better method of helping you out. If you object to having two children so near together, the best way would be to kill the one in your lap and let the other one live. It is easy to get rid of the one on your lap, and it makes no difference to me which one I kill for you. Besides, it might be dangerous for you if I undertook to kill the younger one." As the doctor finished speaking, he reached for a knife and continued by asking the mother to lay the baby out of her lap and turn her head the other way. The woman almost fainted as she jumped from her chair and screamed one word, "Murderer!" A few words of explanation from the doctor soon convinced her that his offer to commit murder was no worse than her request for the destruction of the unborn child. In either case it would be murder. The only difference would be the age of the victim. (Samuel Voisard, East Corinth, MS)

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database ethics

Pro-Choice Vegetarians?

We were discussing vegetarians who refuse to use any animal products. Many of these people won’t eat things like cake because it contains eggs and milk. A vegetarian made the comment that commercial eggs where ok because if they had not been fertilized there was no potential for life. The obvious next question was, “So any egg that is fertilized should be treated as life?” The answer was of course yes.

This person was also pro-choice. When asked about the inconsistency, the person had no answer for her. It occurs to us that many of the vehement pro-choicers we know are also vegan -- funny how the species seems to make a difference.

from Sermon Fodder (from DrLaura.com) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Fighting Unjust Laws: Remembering Martin Luther King, Jr.

On Martin Luther King day we honor the memory of the civil rights crusader. Just days after we marked his birthday a year ago, political operative Donna Brazile invoked his words in a speech -- not about civil rights, but about abortion.

Before a gathering of NARAL, the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League, Brazile declared that freedom would reign only when all women have the right to safe, affordable, legal abortions. By invoking King, Brazile seemed to suggest that King, were he alive today, would be hand-in-glove with the abortion lobby.

Brazile is dead wrong. I believe King would be on the pro-life side, demanding protection for unborn children. I believe this, because King was a fervent believer in natural rights. He penned the most powerful defense of natural law -- the body of moral truths that must undergird our nation's laws -- written in modern decades.

In 1963, King was arrested for leading massive non-violent protests against the segregated lunch counters of Birmingham, Alabama. While in jail, King received a letter from eight ministers. They agreed with King's goals, but they thought he should call off the demonstrations and obey the law. King disagreed, and his famous LETTER FROM A BIRMINGHAM JAIL explains why. “One may well ask,” he wrote, “how can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?” The answer, he said, “is found in the fact that there are two kinds of laws: just laws ... and unjust laws.”

“One has not only a legal, but a moral responsibility to obey just laws,” King affirmed, “but conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.”

A just law, King wrote, “squares with the moral law of the law of God. An unjust law ... is out of harmony with the moral law.”

In saying this, King stood squarely within a long tradition dating back to Aristotle, Augustine, and Aquinas. But today, the whole concept of natural law has fallen out of favor. As Princeton legal philosopher Robert George writes in his book, THE CLASH OF ORTHODOXIES, many secular ideologues teach that “moral rights cannot come as a divine gift because there is no divine giver.” According to this faction, moral rights “exist only in the sense that certain people ... happen to believe ... subjectively -- that rights exist and are willing to honor them. Where people ... do not happen to believe in their existence, rights simply do not exist.”

Confronted with such thinking, Dr. King would have been appalled. As George writes, he knew that without enduring, objective standards of justice, then, as Nietzsche put it, “all things are permitted” -- including segregation and slavery.

“When Christians insist that human laws line up with moral truth,” George writes, “we are not 'imposing religion.’ Instead, we are making the entirely reasonable demand that reason be given its due in human affairs. Unjust law fails to bind the conscience and must be opposed by people of faith.”

On the anniversary of the birth of the great civil rights leader, we ought to teach our children about King's eloquent defense of natural law -- a law that, Donna Brazile notwithstanding, demands that all God's children be set free, not only from the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination, but also from the unspeakable horror of abortion. King's memory demands nothing less.

FURTHER READING AND INFORMATION

This year's March for Life in Washington, D.C., will take place Wednesday, January 22, 2003. http://www.marchforlife.org

BreakPoint Commentary No. 020121, “The Duty to Disobey: Remembering Martin Luther King, Jr.” http://www.pfmonline.net/transcripts.taf?_function=detail&ID=2409&Site=BPT

Mervyn A. Warren, KING CAME PREACHING: THE PULPIT POWER OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. (InterVarsity, 2001). http://www.parable.com/breakpoint/item_0830826580.htm

Robert George, THE CLASH OF ORTHODOXIES: LAW, RELIGION, AND MORALITY IN CRISIS (ISI Books, 2001).

Martin Luther King Jr., LETTER FROM A BIRMINGHAM JAIL, 16 April 1963 (free Adobe Acrobat Reader required http://www.adobe.com). http://www.stanford.edu/group/King/frequentdocs/birmingham.pdf

Peter Kreeft, THREE APPROACHES TO ABORTION (Ignatius Press, 2002).

____________

Copyright (c) 2003 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

[see also HolwickID #22115]

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #14010]

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database injustice

Mother Teresa On Abortion

The editorial in our paper read: "Heaven on wheels--Mother Teresa goes to Washington." It described this little nun from Calcutta getting up to speak at this year's National Prayer Breakfast and saying all the wrong things ... right in front of the President. She skipped all of the traditional, feelgood opening and got down to business:

"The greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child, a direct killing of the innocent child,murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? ..... By abortion, the mother does not learn to love, but kills even her own child to solve her problems. And, by abortion, the father is told that he does not have to take any responsibility at all for the child he has brought into the world..... So abortion just leads to more abortion. Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want."

Our editor commented, "Mother Teresa would be easier to listen to if she were harder to understand, if she talked all around her subject or skipped over it lightly. But apparently she's never learned to obfuscate. This is a serious social handicap, yet she is admired by millions." (from bulletin article by John Gipson, Little Rock, AR)

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database abortion

Teenage pregnancy statistic

1991 ..... 62.1 births per 1000 aged 15 to 19. Illegitimate births rose from 5.3 % in 1960 to 28% in 1991

National Center for Health Statistics and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database abortion

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate