Menu

G4655 σκότος (skótos)

Greek 📖 Greek Word Study
Noun, Masculine and Neuter
‹ G4654 Greek Dictionary G4656 ›

Quick Definition

σκότος, ους, τό n.m. & n.n. darkness

Strong's Definition

shadiness, i.e. obscurity (literally or figuratively)

Derivation: from the base of G4639 (σκιά);

KJV Usage: darkness

UBS Dictionary of the Greek New Testament

noun, n. | -ους | σκοτίζομαι

14.53 · Physical Events and States · Darkness

darkness a condition resulting from the partial or complete absence of light (see 14.36) In a number of languages it is impossible to speak of ‘darkness’ as being an agent in the sense of LUK 23:44 ‘darkness covered the whole country.’ Accordingly, one must say ‘throughout the whole country it was dark’ or ‘it darkened over the whole country.’ In some languages darkness may be characterized as being a quality of the night, for example, ‘it was like night.’

MAT 27:45 · MRK 15:33 · LUK 1:79 · LUK 11:35 · LUK 22:53 · LUK 23:44 · ACT 2:20 · ACT 13:11 · 1CO 4:5 · 2CO 4:6 · 1TH 5:4 · 1TH 5:5 · 1JN 1:6

88.125 · Moral and Ethical Qualities and Related Behavior · Bad, Evil, Harmful, Damaging

evil world, realm of evil, darkness (figurative extension of meaning of σκότος[a] ‘darkness,’ 14.53) the realm of sin and evil It is possible that in COL 1:13 σκότος[b] is a figurative reference to the Devil or Satan, since ἐκ τῆς ἐξουσίας τοῦ σκότους is in a parallel relationship with τὴν βασιλείαν τοῦ υἱοῦ τῆς ἀγάπης αὐτοῦ.

MAT 6:23 · MAT 6:23 · JHN 3:19 · ACT 26:18 · ROM 2:19 · ROM 13:12 · 1CO 4:5 · 2CO 6:14 · EPH 5:8 · EPH 5:11 · EPH 6:12 · COL 1:13 · 1TH 5:4 · 1PE 2:9 · 2PE 2:17 · 1JN 1:6

1.24 · Geographical Objects and Features · Regions Below the Surface of the Earth

Collocation: ὁ ζόφος τοῦ σκότους

gloomy hell, black darkness (an idiom, literally: the gloom of darkness) the dark, gloomy nature of hell as a place of punishment

JUD 1:13

1.23 · Geographical Objects and Features · Regions Below the Surface of the Earth

Collocation: τὸ σκότος τὸ ἐξώτερον

outer darkness, darkness outside (an idiom, literally: the outer darkness) a place or region which is both dark and removed (presumably from the abode of the righteous) and serving as the abode of evil spirits and devils In a number of languages this expression in MAT 8:12 must be rendered as ‘they will be thrown outside where it is dark.’

MAT 8:12 · MAT 22:13 · MAT 25:30

UBS Dictionary of the Greek New Testament © United Bible Societies, licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.

Thayer's Greek Lexicon

σκότος, -ov, ὁ, (cf. σκοτία, init.), fr. Hom. down, darkness: Heb. xii. 18 Ree. [ef. WH. App. p. 158; W. 66 (64); B. 22 (20)]-

Mounce Concise Greek Dictionary

σκότος skotos 31x

darkness, Mt. 27:45; Acts 2:20; gloom of punishment and misery, Mt. 8:12; 2 Pet. 2:17; met. moral or spiritual darkness, Mt. 4:16; Jn. 3:19; Eph. 5:11; a realm of moral darkness, Eph. 5:8; 6:12

Abbott-Smith Greek Lexicon

σκότος, -ου, ὁ the more usual cl. form (cf. σ., τό), darkness: He 12:18, Rec.†

Trench — Synonyms of the New Testament

OF σκότος it needs hardly to speak. It is the largest and most inclusive word of this group; being of very frequent occurrence in the N. T., both in this its Attic form, as also in that of σκοτία, which belongs to the common dialect. It is the exact opposite to das; thus in the profoundly pathetic words of Ajax in Sophocles (4). 394), ἰώ: σκότος ἐμὸν φάος: compare Plato, Rep. vii. 518 a; Job xxii. 11; Luke xii. 3; Acts xxvi. 18. Γνόφος, which is rightly regarded as a later Doric form of δνόφος, occurs only once in the N. T., namely at Heb. xii. 18.and there in connexion with ζόφος : in which same connexion it is found elsewhere (Deut. iv. 11.; Exod. x. 22; Zeph. i. 16). There was evidently a feeling on the part of our early Translators, that an element of tempest was involved in the word, the renderings of it by them being these: ‘mist (Wiclif and Tyndale) ; ‘storm’ (Cranmer); “ blackness’ (Geneva and Authorized Version); ‘ whirlwind’ (Rheims, as ‘turbo’ in the Vulgate). Onur ordinary lexicons indicate very faintly, or not at all, that such a force is to be found in γνόφος : but it is very distinctly recognized by Pott (Htymol. Forsch. vol. v. page 346), who gives, as explanatory equivalents, ‘ Finsterniss,’ ‘ dunkel,’ ‘ Wirbelwind,’ and who with the best modern scholars sees in végas, νέφος, γνόφος and ζόφος, a group of words having much in common, perhaps only different shapes of what was once a single word. It is joined, too, in the Septuagint, where it is of frequent use, with νεφέλη (Joel 11. 2; Ps. xevi. 2; Ezek. xxxiv. 12), and with θύελλα (Deut. iv. LE S:¥.:32), Ζόφος, which occurs four times in the N. T. (2 Pet. ii. 4, 17; Jude 6, 13), or five times, if we make room for it at 374 SYNONYMS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT, § c Heb. xii. 18, as it seems we should, is not found in the Septuagint; twice, however, namely at Ps. x. 2, (Ps.) xe. 6, in the Version of Symmachus. The ζόφος may be contemplated asa kind of emanation of σκότος : thus ὁ ζόφος τοῦ σκότους (Jude 13); and signifies in its first meaning the twilight gloom which broods over the regions of the setting sun, and constitutes so strong a contrast to the life and light of that Orient where the sun may be said to be daily new-born. Ἠερόεις, or the cloudy, is in Homer the standing epithet with which ζόφος, when used in this sense, is linked. But it means more than this. There is a darkness darker still, that, namely, of the sunless underworld, the ‘nigra Tartara’ of Virgil (din. vi. 134) ; the ‘opaca Tartara’ of Ovid (Met. x. 20); the κνεφαῖα Ταρτάpov βάθη of Aischylus (Prom. Vinct. 1029). This, too, it further means, namely that sunless world itself, though indeed this less often than the gloom which wraps it (Homer, Hymn. ad Cer. 338 ; Euripides, Hippolytus, 1434; cf. Job x. 21, 22). It is out of the ζόφος that Ahriman in the Persian mythology is born, as is Ormuzd out of the light (Plutarch, De Is. et Osir. 47). It will at once be perceived with what fitness the word in the N. T. is employed, being ever used to signify the darkness of that shadowy land where light is not, but only darkness visible. ᾿Αχλύς occurs only once in the N. T., namely at Acts xiii. 11; never in the Septuagint, although once in the Version of Symmachus (Job iii. 5). It is by Galen defined as something more dense than ὀμίχλη, less dense than νέφος. In the single place of its N. T. use it attests the accuracy in the selection of words, and not least of medical words, which ‘the beloved physician’ so often displays. For him it expresses the mist of darkness, ἀχλὺς καὶ σκότος, which fell on the sorcerer Elymas, being the outward and visible sign of the inward spiritual darkness which should be his portion for a while in punishment for his resistance to the truth. It is by ‘mist’ that all the §ca. SYNONYMS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. 375 translations of our English Hexapia render it, with the exception of the Rheims, which has ‘ dimness’; while it is rendered well by ‘caligo’ in the Vulgate. St. Luke’s use of the word in the Acts is divided by nearly a thousand years from its employment by Homer; but the meaning has remained absolutely the same ; for indeed it is words with an ethical significance, and not those which express the phenomena of the outward world, that change with the changing years. Thus there is in the Odyssey a fine use of the verb ἀχλύειν (xii. 406), the poet describing there the responsive darkness which comes over the sea as it is overshadowed by a dark cloud (ef. ‘inhorruit unda tenebris’: Virgil, An. 111. 195). ᾿Αχλύς, too, is employed by Homer to express the mist which clouds the eyes of the dying (Jl. xvi. 344), or that in which the gods, for one cause or another, may envelope their favourites. § ci. βέβηλος, Kowvos. THE image which βέβηλος, derived from βηλός, a threshold, suggests, is that of a spot trodden and trampled on, lying open to the casual foot of every intruder or careless passer-by ;—and thus, in words of Thucydides, ἃ χωρίον βέβηλον (iv. 97). Exactly opposite to this is the ἄδυτον, a spot, that is, fenced aud reserved for sacred uses, as such not lightly to be approached, but in the language of the Canticles, ‘a garden enclosed, a spring shut up, a fountain sealed ’ (Cant. iv. 12). It is possible indeed that the ‘profaneness’ which is predicated of person or thing to whom this title is applied, may be rather negatively the absence of any higher consecration than positively the active presence of aught savouring of unholy or profane. Thus it is often joined with ἀμύητος (as by Plutarch, De Def. Orac. 16), signifying no more than one uninitiated, the ἀνοργίαστος, and, as such, arcendus a sacris ; compare Plato, Symp. 218 ὃ, where it is joined with ἀγροῖκος. In like manner ἄρτοι θέβηλοι 276 SYNONYMS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. 8 οι. (1 Sam. xxi. 4) are simply unconsecrated common loaves, as contrasted with the shew-bread which the high priest declares to be holy. Not otherwise the Latin ‘ profanus ’ means no more than that which is left outside the τέμενος, that which is ‘pro fano,’ and thus wanting the consecration which the τέμενος, or sanctuary, has obtained. We, too, in English mean no more, when we distinguish between ‘sacred’ and ‘ profane’ history, setting the one over against the other. We do not imply thereby any profaneness, positive and properly so called, in the latter, but only that it is not what the former is, a history having in the first place to do with the kingdom of God, and the course of that kingdom. So too it fared at first with βέβηλος. It was only in later use that it came to be set over against ἅγιος (Ezek. xxii. 6) and ὅσιος, to be joined with ἀνόσιος (1 Tim. i. 9), with γραώδης (iv. 7), with ἄνομος (Ezek. ii. 25), that μιαραὶ χεῖρες (2 Mace. v. 16) could within a few lines be changed for βέβηλοι, as an adequate equivalent. But in what relations, it may be asked, do βέβηλος and κοινός stand to one another? Before bringing the latter into such questionable company it may be observed that we have many pleasant and honourable uses of κοινός and its derivatives, κοινωνία and κοινωνικός, in the N. T.; thus Jude 3; 2 Cor. xiii. 13; 1 Tim. vi. 18; while in heathen Greek Socrates is by Dio Chrysostom happily characterized as κοινὸς καὶ φιλάνθρωπος, giving himself, that is, no airs, and in nothing withdrawing himself from friendly and familiar intercourse with his fellow-men; the word being capable of finding a yet higher application to Him, of whom some complained that He ate with publicans and sinners (Matt. ix. 10, 11). He, too, in this sense, and in the noblest aspect of the word, was κοινός. This, however, only by the way. The employment with which we have here to do of κοινός and κοινόω in sacred things, and as equivalent to βέβηλος and βεβηλόω, is exclusively Jewish Hel§cr. SYNONYMS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. 377 lenistic. One might claim for it to be restricted to the N. T. alone, if it were not for two exceptional examples (1 Mace. i. 47, 62). Comparing Acts xxi. 28, and xxiv. 6, we have curious implicit evidence that such an employment of κοινός was, at the time when the Acts were written, unfamiliar, probably unknown, to the heathen. The Jewish adversaries of St. Paul, when addressing their Israelitish fellow-countrymen, make their charge against him, κεκοίνωκε τὸν ἅγιον τόπον (Acts xxi. 28) ; but when they are bringing against him the same accusation, not now to their Jewish fellow-countrymen, but to Felix, a heathen, they change their word, and the charge runs, ἐπείρασε βεβηλῶσαι τὸ ἱερόν (Acts xxiv. 6); the other language would have been here out of keeping, might very likely have been unintelligible. Very noticeable is the manner in which κοινός in the N. T. more and more encroaches on the province of meaning which, first belonging exclusively to βέβηλος, the two came afterwards to divide between them, but with the result that κοινός gradually assumed to itself the larger share, and was used the most often (Mark vii. 2; Acts x. 14; Rom. xiv. 14, bis; Heb. x. 29). How this came to pass, how βέβηλος had, since the Septuagint was written, been gradually pushed from its place, is not difficult to see. Kovvés, which stepped into its room, more commended itself to Jewish ears, as bringing out by contrast the ἐκλογή of the Jewish people as a λαὸς περιούσιος, having no fellowship with aught which was unclean. The less that there necessarily lay in κοινός of defilement, the more strongly the separation of Israel was brought out, that would endure no fellowship with things which had any commonness about them. The ceremonially unclean was in fact more and more breaking down the barrier which divided it from _ that which was morally unclean; and doing away with any distinction between them. 378 SYNONYMS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. 8 σι.

Moulton & Milligan — Vocabulary of the Greek NT

σκότος, “darkness,” always neut. in LXX and NT, as in Μάυς cf. the magic P Lond 46! (iv/A.p.) (= 1. p. 68) καλῶ... σε Toy κτίσαντα φῶς καὶ σκότος, 20." 6 χωρίσας τὸ φῶς ἀ]πὸ τοῦ σκότους, 120. 121783 (iii/A.p.) (=I. p. 108) ἀπὸ φωτὸς εἰς σκότος ἀπολήγουσα, and the vi/A.pD. Christian letter of condolence P Oxy XVI. 18748 ἀνέγνοσα τὸ σκότος, unfortunately in a broken context.

Liddell-Scott-Jones — Greek-English Lexicon

σκότος (skotos) — darkness. σκότος, ὁ, more rarely σκότος, εος, τό (see. entry near the end), darkness, gloom, [Refs 8th c.BC+]; opposed to φάος, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; opposed to ἡμέρα, [Refs 5th c.BC+]

2. in [Refs 8th c.BC+] always of the darkness of death, mostly in phrase τὸν δὲ σ. ὄσσε κάλυψεν [Refs]; so in Trag. and Comedy texts, σκότῳ θανεῖν [Refs 5th c.BC+]; ἤδη με περιβάλλει σ. [Refs 5th c.BC+]; σκότον εἶναι τεθνηκότος (i.e. Αἰσχύλου) [Refs 5th c.BC+]

3. of the nether world, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; παῖδες ἀρχαίου Σκότου[Refs 5th c.BC+]

4. the darkness of the womb, φυγόντα μητρόθεν σκότον [Refs 4th c.BC+]

5. of blindness, σκότου νέφος [Refs 5th c.BC+]; βλέποντα νῦν μὲν ὄρθ᾽, ἔπειτα δὲ σκότον, i.e. μηδέν,[Refs 5th c.BC+]

5. b dizziness, vertigo, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; compare σκοτόδινος, -δινιάω.

6. metaphorically, σκότῳ κρύπτειν hide in darkness, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; σκότον ἔχειν to be in darkness, obscurity, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; ἀπορία καὶ σ. [Refs 5th c.BC+] it is dark and uncertain, [Refs 5th c.BC+]

7. of a person, Μητρότιμος ὁ σ., like{ὁ σκοτεινός}, the mystery-man, [Refs 6th c.BC+]; also, darkness, i.e. ignorance, [Refs 4th c.BC+]; deceit, σ. καὶ ἀπάτη [Refs 5th c.BC+]

8. plural, σκότη shadows in a picture, [Refs 2nd c.AD+] regarded the masculine as the Attic dialect form: the neuter never occurs in [Refs 5th c.BC+], and is nowhere required by the metre in Trag., though it sometimes occurs in codices, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; it is found, however, without variant, in [Refs 5th c.BC+] and Attic dialect Prose, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; the word is always neuter in LXX and “NT.” σκοτί-α, ἡ, (σκότος) darkness, gloom, [NT+3rd c.BC+]

II. in Architecture, scotia, cavetto, a sunken moulding, so called from the dark shadow it casts, [Refs 1st c.BC+]

III. Σκοτιά, epithet of Aphrodite in Egypt, [Refs]

STEPBible — Tyndale Abridged Greek Lexicon

σκότος, -ου, ὁ the more usual cl. form (cf.σ., τό), darkness: Heb.12:18, Rec.† (AS)

Bible Occurrences (29)

4:5
2:9
1:6

📖 Greek Word Study — In-Depth Study from Precept Austin

Darkness (4655) skotos

Darkness (4655) (skotos from skia = shadow thrown by an object. Skia it can assume the meaning of skotos and indicate the sphere of darkness) is literally that sphere in which light is absent. The phrase "the outer darkness" refers to the place of punishment or exclusion from God Who is light! Skotos is used 30 times in the NAS -- Matt. 4:16; 6:23; 8:12; 22:13; 25:30; 27:45; Mk. 15:33; Lk. 1:79; 11:35; 22:53; 23:44; Jn. 3:19; Acts 2:20; 13:11; 26:18; Rom. 2:19; 13:12; 1 Co. 4:5; 2 Co. 4:6; 6:14; Eph. 5:8, 11; 6:12; Col. 1:13; 1 Thess. 5:4, 5; 1 Pet. 2:9; 2 Pet. 2:17; 1 Jn. 1:6; Jude 1:13 and is translated "darkness" every time! Click (or here) for more in depth discussion of the Biblical concept of "Darkness". See Torrey's Topic Darkness NIDNTT explains that In classic Gk. darkness applies primarily to the state characterized by the absence of light (phos) without any special metaphysical overtones. The thought is chiefly of the effect of darkness upon man. In the dark man gropes around uncertainly (Plato, Phaedo, 99b), since his ability to see is severely limited. Thus the man who can see may become blind in the darkness, and no longer know which way to turn. Hence darkness appears as the “sphere of objective peril and of subjective anxiety” (H. Conzelmann, TDNT VII 424). Since all anxiety ultimately derives from the fear of death, the ominous character of darkness culminates in the darkness of death which no man can escape (cf. Homer, Il., 4, 461). Darkness is therefore Hades, the world of the dead, which already reaches out into our world in the mythical figures of the Eumenides, the children of Skotos and Gaia (Soph., Oedipus Coloneus, 40). Freed from their proper, temporal sense, the words of this group can be used in a metaphorical sense to describe human ways of life and behaviour. Thus they can describe a man’s seclusion or obscurity. They can also indicate the secrecy, furtiveness or deceitfulness of his activity, the abstruseness of his speech, lack of enlightenment, insight and knowledge. “The word does not attain to high conceptual rank in philosophy. Mention of darkness serves to set off light; it has no philosophical content of its own” (TDNT VII 425 f.). (Brown, Colin, Editor. New International Dictionary of NT Theology. 1986. Zondervan) Skotos can refer to literal darkness as occurred on the day of Jesus' crucifixion (Mt 27:45) or darkness as opposed to light in the creation (2Cor 4:6). Skotos is used as another name for the place of punishment, eternal misery and eternal separation from God (the meaning of skotos here in 2Peter) . Skotos figuratively can refer to spiritual or moral darkness (including a lack of understanding) as in the following examples "(Jesus declared) And this is the judgment, that the light is come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the light; for their deeds were evil. (John 3:19) "(the gospel would) to open their eyes so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the dominion of Satan to God, in order that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who have been sanctified by faith in Me.' (Acts 26:18) If we say that we have fellowship with Him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth (truth is not only something we should believe and teach but also something we should practice, otherwise our life is a "lie") (1John 1:6-note) And do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them; (Ephesians 5:11 sermon note) For He delivered us from the domain of darkness, and transferred us to the kingdom of His beloved Son, (note Colossians 1:13) The night is almost gone, and the day is at hand. Let us therefore lay aside the deeds of darkness and put on the armor of light. (see note Romans 13:12) Absence of light leaves room for evil and sin. In this sense darkness may be described as evil. In his first epistle Peter used skotos figuratively explaining to the believers that... you are A CHOSEN RACE, A royal PRIESTHOOD, A HOLY NATION, A PEOPLE FOR God's OWN POSSESSION, that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who has called you out of darkness (the moral and spiritual condition that enshrouds this present world and all those who do not know Christ) into His marvelous light (note 1 Peter 2:9) Darkness is used to describe the spiritual powers of Satan and his evil empire... "While I was with you daily in the temple, you did not lay hands on Me; but this hour and the power of darkness are yours." (Luke 22:53) For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places. (Ephesians 6:12 note) In Acts 13:11 skotos is used to refer to physical blindness or inability to see (literally) Note that skotos is the essence of darkness, darkness itself and as applied to sin is the essence of sin. On the other hand the closely related word skotia speaks more of the consequence of darkness, and so the consequences of sin is the darkness that man has to live in, that darkness entering into Adam in the Garden of Eden. Ponder what Peter is saying in view of John's declaration... And this is the message we have heard from Him and announce to you, that God is light, and in Him there is no darkness at all. (1John 1:5-note) The opposite of light is absolute darkness. Where God is there can be no darkness. Conversely where the darkness is indicates separation from God. God’s children have been "qualified... to share in the inheritance of the saints in light... delivered... from the domain of darkness and transferred... to the kingdom of His beloved Son" (Col 1:12-13-notes Col 1:12-13). The children of the devil, especially his servants who masquerade as ambassadors of light, walk around in spiritual darkness (and separation from God) today, but their darkness is but a foretaste of the utter "black darkness" that awaits them when they die. Not only is their eternal destiny of purposeless existence horrible but Peter graphically describes their present life as utter emptiness and purposelessness. All life lived without the spiritual goals of glorifying God and worshiping Him is an empty and purposeless existence. Jesus described the ultimate destiny of the lost declaring... but the sons of the kingdom (speaking of the Jews who had the special privilege as the chosen nation) shall be cast out into the outer darkness (the final hell); in that place there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." (Mt 8:12) "Then the king said to the servants, 'Bind him hand and foot, and cast him into the outer darkness; in that place there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth (describes the extreme torment that sadly will be true in hell).' (Mt 22:13) "And cast out the worthless slave into the outer darkness; in that place there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. (Mt 25:30 Earlier Peter had reminded his readers... For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell and committed them to pits of darkness, reserved for judgment (see notes 2 Peter 2:4) Jude has a parallel description writing that... And angels who did not keep their own domain, but abandoned their proper abode, He has kept in eternal bonds under darkness for the judgment of the great day. (Jude 1:6) (The men who have crept into the church and are turning the grace of God into licentiousness are like) wild waves of the sea, casting up their own shame like foam; wandering stars, for whom the black darkness has been reserved forever. (Jude 1:13) "The gloom of darkness is stored up for them" (NJB) or even more literally "the blackness of darkness." Here Peter once again sounds the knell of doom for the false teachers consigning them to "black darkness" which is simply beyond human comprehension. Black as explained above (see zophos) describes darkness that ranges from partial to total and conveys the idea of foreboding and gloom and here specifically referring to the thick darkness associated with the region of those who are lost. The addition of "black" to "darkness" (skotos, the essence of darkness) would seem unnecessary but is Peter's way of "multiplying" the horror and terror of the deserved fate of these men. Jesus uses a similar description three times in Matthew, stating for example that "the sons of the kingdom will be cast out into the outer darkness; in that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth." (Mt 8:12; cf 22:13; 25:30) (See numerous Scriptures in Torrey's Topic "Punishment of the Wicked") Wiersbe has an instructive note writing that... "These apostates promise to lead people into the light, but they themselves end up in the darkest part of the darkness! (see Jude 1:6, 1:13) The atmosphere of hell is not uniform: some places will be darker than others. How tragic that innocent people will be led astray by these apostates and possibly end up in hell with them." Compare James' fearful warning that "not many of you become teachers, my brethren, knowing that as such we shall incur a stricter judgment." (Ja 3:1) Note that in (2 Peter 2:4- note) Peter speaks of the wicked angels presently in “chains of utter darkness,” while the final fate of the false teachers is a darker place still! Woe! (Wiersbe, W: Bible Exposition Commentary. 1989. Victor) Calvin says Peter pronounces "on them the dreadful judgment of God, that fear might restrain the faithful. By naming the mist or the blackness of darkness, he alludes to the clouds which obscure the air; as though he had said, that for the momentary darkness which they now spread, there is prepared for them a much thicker darkness which is to continue for ever." Wayne Barber makes a distinction between the two Greek words, skotos and skotia...in his sermon on 1John (1Jn 1:5-10 - Evidence of Christianity) The term "darkness" is found in 1 John several times. I want to make sure we understand what it means. It is found in 1Jn 1:5, 6, and in 1Jn 2:8, 9, 11. There are two different words used for darkness. The first word is in 1Jn 1:5. It is the word skotia. In 1Jn 1:6 it is the word skotos. Now if you look in a Greek lexicon, you are going to find in 1Jn 1:5 it says skotia means darkness and skotos in 1Jn 1:6 means darkness. That is all they are basically say but if you run both words through the NT, you will discover that there is a significant difference in verses 1Jn 1:5 and 1Jn 1:6. Skotia (1Jn 1:5) is the word John uses 98% of the time in both his gospel and his epistles. Skotos is rarely used and in fact, it is only used by John in 1Jn 1:6 and in Jn 3:19. Let me show you the difference. The word in 1Jn 1:5, skotia, means the result of darkness. If I walk outside in the darkness and fall over a stump and break my leg, I have been out in the darkness. But I have suffered the consequence of being in that darkness. The word skotos in 1Jn 1:6 means the essence of darkness itself. Let’s look over in John 3:19 (which uses skotos). I want you to see what this darkness is. Why does John bring up the word "darkness" and contrast it with light? The answer is that he is dealing with false doctrine. Any false doctrine is darkness. It is clear here that darkness is the environment in which men seek to hide their sin. And this is the judgment, that the light is come into the world, and men loved the darkness." This is not the consequence of the darkness because they haven’t realized that yet, but they love the essence of darkness. They love the darkness "rather than the light; for their deeds were evil. (John 3:19) John 3:20 says For everyone who does evil hates the light, and does not come to the light lest his deeds should be exposed. So we see that darkness, skotos, is something that hides a man’s sin. He likes it because no one knows what is going on in the darkness. But Jesus is the light, and when Jesus comes into a man’s life, He turns on the light and exposes what is going on. That is why men would not respond to the light. That is the judgment that has come into the world. In 1 John 1:6 we see a very similar truth. John writes says, If we say that we have fellowship with Him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth." "Lie" and "practice" are in the present tense, so they should read "lying" and "practicing." In other words, John is saying, "You can’t say you know Christ and seek to go off in the darkness and hide your sin. You cannot do that and claim to be a believer." (1Jn 1:5-10 - Evidence of Christianity)

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate