Judges 5

Judges 5:1-31

THE BOOK OF JUDGESJudges 1-21.THE Book of Judges continues the Book of Joshua. There are some Books of the Bible, the proper location of which require careful study, but Judges follows Joshua in chronological order. The Book opens almost identically with the Book of Joshua. In the latter the reading is, “Now after the death of Moses the servant of the Lord it came to pass that the Lord spake unto Joshua”. In the Book of Judges, “Now after the death of Joshua it came to pass, that the Children of Israel asked thd Lord, saying Who shall go up for us against the Canaanites first, to fight against them? And the Lord said, Judah shall go up”.

God always has His man chosen and His ministry mapped out. We may worry about our successors and wonder whether we shall be worthily followed, but as a matter of fact that is a question beyond us and does not belong to us.

It is not given to man to choose “prophets, apostles, evangelists, pastors and teachers”. That prerogative belongs to the ascended Lord, and He is not derelict in His duty nor indifferent to the interests of Israel. Before one falls, He chooses another. The breach in time that bothers men is not a breach to Him at all. It is only an hour given to the people for the expression of bereavement. It is only a day in which to calm the public mind and call out public sympathy and centralize and cement public interest.Men may choose their co-laborers as Judah chose Simeon; leaders may pick out their captains as Moses did, and as did Joshua; but God makes the first choice, and when men leave that choice to Him, He never makes a mistake.Whenever a captain of the hosts of the Lord is unworthily succeeded, misguided’ men have forgotten God and made the choice on the basis of their own judgment.People sometimes complain of some indifferent or false preacher, “We can’t see why God sent us such a pastor”.

He didn’t! You called him yourself.

You didn’t sufficiently consult God. You didn’t keep your ears open to the still, small voice. You didn’t wait on bended knees until He said, “Behold your leader; follow him!”When God appoints Judah, he also delivers the Canaanites and the Perizzites into his hands. Adoni-bezek, the brutal, will be humbled by him; the capital city will fall before him; the southland will succumb, also the north and the east and the west, and the mountains will capitulate before the Lord of Hosts.But the Book of Judges doesn’t present a series of victories. There is no Book in the Bible that so clearly typifies the successes and reverses, the ups and downs, the victories and defeats of the church, as the history of Israel here illustrates. It naturally divides itself under The Seven Apostasies, The Successive Judges, and The Civil War.THE SEVEN The first chapter is not finished before failure finds expression.

Of Judah it was said he could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley “because they had chariots of iron” (Judges 1:19). Of the children of Benjamin it was said, “They did not drive out the Jebusites that inhabited Jerusalem” (Judges 1:21).

Of Manasseh it was said, They did not “drive out the inhabitants of Beth-Shean and her towns, nor Taanach and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Dor and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Ibleam and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Megiddo and her towns: but the Canaanites would dwell in that land” (Judges 1:27). Neither did Ephraim drive out the Canaanites that dwelt in Gezer, (Judges 1:29); neither did Zebulun drive out the inhabitants of Kitron (Judges 1:30), nor the inhabitants of Mahalol. Neither did Asher (Judges 1:31) drive out the inhabitants of Acho nor of Zidon; neither did Naphthali drive out the inhabitants of Beth-Shemesh (Judges 1:33), and this failure to clear the field results in an aggressive attack before the first chapter finishes, and the Amorites force the children of Dan into the mountain (Judges 1:34).If one study these seven apostasies that follow one another in rapid succession, he will be impressed by two or three truths. They resulted from the failure to execute the command of the Lord. The command of the Lord to Joshua was that he should expel the people from before him and drive them from out of his sight, and possess their land (Joshua 23:5). He was not to leave any among them nor to make mention of any of their gods (Joshua 23:7).

He was promised that one of his men should chase a thousand. He was even told that if any were left and marriage was made with them that they should know for a certainty that the Lord God would no more drive out any of these nations from before them; that they should be snares and traps and scourges and thorns, until Israel perished from off the good land that God had given them (Joshua 23:13).

How strangely the conduct of Israel, once in the land, comports with this counsel given them before they entered it; and there is a typology in all of this.The Christian life has its enemies–social enemies, domestic enemies, national enemies! One’s companionship will determine one’s conduct; one’s marriage relation will eventuate religiously or irreligiously. The character of one’s nation is more or less influential upon life.The ordinance of baptism, the initial rite into the church, looks to an absolute separation from the world, and is expressed by the Apostle Paul as a death unto sin, the clear intent being that no evil customs are to be kept, nor companions retained, nor entangling alliances maintained. The word now is as the word then, “Come out from among them, and be ye separate” (2 Corinthians 6:17).They imperiled their souls by this forbidden social intercourse. It is very difficult to live with a people and not become like them. It is very difficult to dwell side by side with nations and not intermarry.

Intermarriage between believers and unbelievers is almost certain to drag down the life of the former to the level of the latter. False worship, like other forms of sin, has its subtle appeal; and human nature being what it is, false gods rise easily to exalted place in corrupted affections.If there is one thing God tried to do for ancient Israel, and one thing God tries to do for the new Israel, the Church, it was, and is, to get His people to disfellowship the world.There are men who think God is a Moloch because He so severely punished Israel’s compromises.

They can’t forget that when Joshua went over Jordan and Israel lay encamped on the skirts of the mountains of Moab, her people visited a high place near the camp whereon a festival of Midian, idolatrous, licentious in the extreme, was in process, and they went after this putrid paganism and polluted their own souls with the idolatrous orgy. Then it was that Moses, speaking for the Lord, said, “Take all the heads of the people, and hang them up before the Lord against the sun”, and while that hideous row of dead ones was still before their eyes, the plague fell on the camp and 24,000 of the transgressors perished! But severe as it was, Israel soon forgot, showing that it was not too severe, and raising the question as to whether it was severe enough to impress the truth concerning idolatry and all its infamous effects.Solomon is commonly reputed to have been the wisest of men, and yet it was his love alliances with the strange women of Moab, Ammon, Zidon and the Hittites, these very people, that brought the Lord’s anger against him and compelled God to charge him with having turned from the Lord God of Israel and in consequence of which God said, “I will surely rend the kingdom from thee, and will give it to thy servant” (1 Kings 11:11).Again and again the kingdom has been lost after the same manner. The present peril of the church is at this point, and by its alliance with the world, the kingdom of our Lord is delayed, and Satan, the prince of this world, remains in power, and instead of 24,000 people perishing in judgment, tens of thousands and millions of people perish through this compromise, and swallowed up in sin, rush into hell.But to follow the text further is to find their restoration to God’s favor rested with genuine repentance. There are recorded in Judges seven apostasies; they largely result from one sin. There are seven judgments, increasing in severity, revealing God’s determined purpose to correct and save; and there are seven recoveries, each of them in turn the result of repentance.

God never looks upon a penitent man, a penitent people, a penitent church, a penitent nation, without compassion and without turning from His purposes of judgment. When the publican went up into the temple to pray, his was a leprous soul, but when he smote upon his breast and cried, “God be merciful to me a sinner”, his was the instant experience of mercy.

When at Pentecost, 2500 sincere souls fell at the feet of Peter and the other Apostles, and cried, “Men and brethren, what shall we do”, the response was, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the Name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins”; and the promise was, “Ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost”.When David, who was a child of God, guilty of murder and adultery combined, poured out his soul as expressed in the Fifty-first Psalm, God heard that prayer, pardoned those iniquities, restored him to the Divine favor, and showered him with proofs of the Divine love.When Nineveh went down in humility, a city of 600,000 souls, every one of whom from Sardana-palus, the king on the throne, to the humblest peasant within the walls, proving his repentance by sitting in sackcloth and ashes, God turned at once from the evil He had thought to do unto them and “He did it not”, and Nineveh was saved.The simple truth is, God has no pleasure in the death of the wicked. He never punishes from preference, but only for our profit; and, even then, like a father, He suffers more deeply than the children upon whom His strokes of judgment fall.What a contrast to that statement of Scripture, “I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked”, is that other sentence, “Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of His saints”. The reason is not far to seek. In the first case it is death indeed; death fearful, death eternal. In the second case, death is a birth, a release from the flesh that held to a larger, richer, fuller life. In that God takes pleasure.There is then for the sinner no royal road to the recovery of God’s favor.

It is the thorny path of repentance instead. It is through Bochim, “the Vale of Tears”; but it were just as well that the prodigal, returning home, should not travel by a flowery path.

He will be the less tempted to go away again if his back-coming is with agony, and home itself will seem the more sweet when reached if there his weary feet find rest for the first time, and from their bleeding soles the thorns are picked; if there his nakedness is clothed, his hunger is fed and his sense of guilt is kissed away. Oh, the grace of God to wicked men the moment repentance makes possible their forgiveness!The court in Minneapolis yesterday illustrated this very point. When a young man, who had been wayward indeed, who had turned highway-robber, saw his error, sobbed his way to Christ and voluntarily appeared in court and asked to have sentence passed, newspapers expressed surprise that the heart of the judge should have been so strangely moved, and that the sentence the law absolutely required to be passed upon him, should have been, by the judge, suspended, and the young man returned to his home and wife and babe. But our Judge, even God, is so compassionate that such conduct on His part excites no surprise. It is His custom! Were it not so, every soul of us would stand under sentence of death.

The law which is just and holy and good has passed that sentence already, and it is by the grace of God we have our reprieve. Seven apostasies?

Yes! Seven judgments? Yes! But seven salvations! Set that down to the honor and glory of our God! It is by grace we are saved!THE JUDGESEvidently God has no special regard for some of our modern superstitions, for in this period of conquest He deliberately chooses thirteen judges and sets them over Israel in turn, beginning with Othniel, the son of Kenaz, and nephew of Caleb, and concluding with Samson, the son of Manoah.They represented varied stations of Israelitish society.

A careful review of their personal history brings a fresh illustration of the fact that God is “no respector of persons”; and it also illustrates the New Testament statement that “Not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called”. With few exceptions these judges had not been heard of until their appointment rendered necessary some slight personal history.

That is the Divine method until this hour. How seldom the children of the great are themselves great. How often, when God needs a ruler in society, He seeks a log cabin and chooses an angular lad—Abe Lincoln. The difference between the inspired Scriptures and yesterday’s newspaper is in the circumstance that the Scriptures tell the truth about men and leave God to do the gilding and impart the glory, instead of trying to establish the same through some noble family tree. There is a story to the effect that a young artist, working under his master in the production of a memorial window that represented the greatest and best that art ever knew, picked up, at the close of the day, the fragments of glass flung aside, and finally wrought from them a window more glorious still. Whether this is historically correct or not, we know what God has done with the refuse of society again and again.

Truly“God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;“And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:“That no flesh should glory in His presence * * * * He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord” (1 Corinthians 1:27-29; 1 Corinthians 1:31).Out of these un-named ones some were made to be immortal—Gideon, Jephthae, Samson, Deborah.Gideon, the son of Joash, became such because he dared to trust God. The average Captain of hosts wants men increased that the probabilities of victory may grow proportionately.

At the word of the Lord Gideon has his hundreds of thousands and tens of thousands reduced to a handful. What are three hundred men against the multitude that compassed him about? And what are pitchers, with lights in them, against swords and spears and stones; and yet his faith failed not! He believed that, God with him, no man could be against him. When Paul comes to write his Epistle to the Hebrews and devotes a long chapter of forty verses to a list of names made forever notable through faith, Gideon and Barak and Samson and Jephthae—these all appear, and they are put there properly, reason confirming revelation. Barak had faced the hundreds of iron chariots of the enemy, and yet at the word of the Lord, had dared to brave and battle them.

Samson, with no better equipment than the jaw-bone of an ass, had slain his heaps. Jephthae, when he had made a vow to the Lord, though it cost him that which was dearer than life, would keep it.

Such characters are safe in history. Whatever changes may come over the face of the world, however notable may eventually be names; whatever changes may occur in the conceptions of men as to what makes for immortality, those who believe in God will abide, and children’s children will call their names blessed. Gideon will forever stand for a combination of faith and courage. Barak will forever represent the man who, at the word of the Lord, will go against great odds. Jephthae will forever be an encouragement to men who, having sincerely made vows, will solemnly keep the same; and Samson will forever represent, not his prowess, but the strength of the Lord, which, though it may express itself in the person of a man, knows no limitations so long as that man remains loyal to his vows, and the spirit of the Lord rests upon him.Before passing from this study, however, permit me to call your attention to the fact that there was made a political exception in the matter of sex. We supposed that the putting of woman into man’s place is altogether a modern invention.

Not so; it is not only a fact in English language but in human history, that “all rules have their exceptions.” God’s rule for prophets is men, and yet the daughters of Philip were prophetesses. God’s rule for kings is men, and yet one of the greatest of rulers was Queen Victoria.

God’s rule for judges is men, and yet Deborah was long since made an exception. Let it be understood that the exception to the rule is not intended to supplant the rule. The domestic circle is God’s choice for womankind, and her wisdom, tact and energy are not only needed there, but find there their finest employment. And yet there are times when through the indifference of men, or through their deadness to the exigencies of the day, God can do nothing else than raise up a Deborah, speak to a Joan of Arc, put on the throne a Victoria.I noticed in a paper recently a discussion as to whether women prominent in politics proved good mothers, and one minister at least insisted that they did. We doubt it! The text speaks of Deborah as “a mother in Israel”, but we find no mention of her children.

Our judgment is that had there been born to her a dozen of her own Israel might never have known her leadership. The unmarried woman, or the barren wife, may have time and opportunity for social and political concern; but the mother of children commonly finds her home sphere sufficient for all talents, and an opportunity to reach society, cleanse politics, aid the church, help the world, as large an office as ever came to man.

However, let it be understood that all our fixed customs, all our standard opinions, give place when God speaks. If it is His will that a woman judge, then she is best fitted for that office; if He exalts her to lead armies, then victory will perch upon her banners; if He calls her to the place of power on the throne, then ruling wisdom is with her.In the language of the Apostle Paul, “And what shall I say more, for the time would fail me to tell of Gideon and of Samson and of Barak and of Jepkthae”. They are all great characters and worthy extended discussion. It would equally fail me to rehearse the confusion, civil and religious, that follows from the seventeenth chapter of this Book to the end, but in chapters nineteen to twenty-one there is recorded an incident that cannot in justice to an outline study, be overlooked, for it results inTHE CIVIL WARTracing that war to its source, we find it was the fruit of the adoption of false religions. We have already seen some of the evil effects of this intermingling with heathen faiths, but we need not expect an end of such effects so long as the compromise obtains. There is no peace in compromise; no peace with your enemies.

A compromise is never satisfactory to either side. Heathen men do not want half of their polytheism combined with half of your monotheism.

They are not content to give up a portion of their idolatry and take in its place praises to the one and only God. The folly of this thing was shown when a few years since the leaders of the International Sunday School Association attempted to temporarily affiliate Christianity with Buddhism. The native Christians in Japan, in proportion to their sincere belief in the Bible arid in Christ, rejected the suggestion as an insult to their new faith, and the followers of Buddha and the devotees of Shintoism would not be content with Christian conduct unless the Emperor was made an object of worship and Christian knees bowed before him. It must be said, to the shame of certain Sunday School leaders, that they advocated that policy and prostrated themselves in the presence of His Majesty to the utter disgust of their more uncompromising fellows. The consequence was, no Convention of the International Association has been so unsatisfactory and produced such poor spiritual results as Tokio’s.Confusion is always the consequence of compromise, and discontent is the fruit of it, and fights and battles and wars are the common issue.Idolatry is deadly; graven images cannot be harmonized with the true God. The first and second commandments cannot be ignored and the remainder of the Decalog kept.

It is God or nothing! It is the Bible or nothing!

It is the “faith once delivered” or infidelity!The perfidy of Benjamin brought on the battle. We have already seen that men grow like those with whom they intimately associate. This behavior on the part of the Benjamites is just what you would have expected. The best of men still have to battle with the bad streak that belongs to the flesh incident to the fall; and, when by evil associations that streak is strengthened, no man can tell what may eventually occur. Had this conduct been recorded against the heathen, it would not have amazed us at all. We speedily forget that as between men there is no essential difference.

Circumstances and Divine aid—these make a difference that is apparent indeed; but it is not so much because one is better than the other, but rather because one has been better situated, less tempted, more often strengthened; or else because he has found God and stands not in himself but in a Saviour.Pick up your paper tomorrow morning and there will be a record of deeds as dark as could be recorded against the natives of Africa, or those of East India or China, Siberia or the South Sea Islands. The conduct of these men toward the concubine was little worse than that of one of our own citizens in a land of civilization and Christianity, who lately snatched a twelve-year-old girl and kept her for days as his captive, and when at last she eluded him, it was only to wander back to her home, despoiled and demented.

Do you wonder that God is no respecter of persons? Do you wonder that the Bible teaches there is no difference? Do you doubt it is all of grace?The issues of that war proved the presence and power of God. There are men who doubt if God is ever in battle; but history reveals the fact that few battles take place without His presence. The field of conflict is commonly the place of judgment, and justice is seldom or never omitted. We may be amazed to see Israel defeated twice, and over 40,000 of her people fall, when as a matter of fact she went up animated by the purpose of executing vengeance against an awful sin.

Some would imagine that God would go with them and not a man would fall, and so He might have done had Israel, including Judah and all loyal tribes, been themselves guiltless. But such was not the truth!

They had sins that demanded judgment as surely as Benjamin’s sin, and God would not show Himself partial to either side, but mete out judgment according to their deserts. That is why 40,000 of the Israelites had to fall. They were facing then their own faithlessness. They were paying the price of their own perfidy. They were getting unto themselves proofs that their fellowship with the heathen and their adoption of heathen customs was not acceptable with God.Many people could not understand why England and France and Belgium and Canada and Australia and America should have lost so heavily in the late war, 1914—1918, believing as we did believe that their cause was absolutely just. Why should God have permitted them to so suffer in its defense?

Millions upon millions of them dying, enormous wealth destroyed, women widowed, children orphaned, lands sacked, cities burned, cathedrals ruined, sanctuaries desecrated. The world around, there went up a universal cry, “Why?” And yet the answer is not far to seek.

England was not guiltless; France was not guiltless; Belgium was not guiltless.Poor Belgium! All the world has turned to her with pity and we are still planning aid for the Belgians and to preach to them and their children the Gospel of grace, and this we should do; but God had not forgotten that just a few years ago Belgium was blackening her soul by her conduct in the Belgian Congo. Natives by the score and hundreds were beaten brutally, their hands cut off because they did not carry to the Belgian king as much rubber and ivory as Belgian avarice demanded. American slavery, in its darkest hour, never knew anything akin to the oppression and persecution to which Belgium subjected the blacks in the Congo. Significant, indeed, is the circumstance that when the Germans came into Belgium, many Belgian hands were cut off; hapless and helpless children were found in this mangled state. Frightful as it was, it must have reminded Belgian authorities of their sins in Africa and of the certainty and exactitude of final judgment.We have an illustration of this truth in the Book of Judges.

When Judah went up against the Canaanites and the Lord delivered them into his hands, they slew in Bezek 10,000 men. They found Adoni-Bezek, the king, and fought against him, and caught him and cut off his thumbs and great toes.

We cry “Horror!” and wonder that God’s own people could so behave; but, complete the sentence, and you begin to see justice, “And Adoni-bezek said, Threescore and ten kings, having their thumbs and their great toes cut off, gathered their meat under my table. As I have done, so God hath requited me” (Judges 1:7).Think of England in her infamous opium traffic, forcing it upon natives at the mouths of guns, enriching her own exchecquer at the cost of thousands and tens of thousands of hapless natives of East India and China!Think of France, with her infidelity, having denied God, desecrated His sabbath, rejected His Son and given themselves over to absinthe and sensuality!Think of the United States with her infamous liquor traffic, shipping barrels upon barrels to black men and yellow men, and cursing the whole world to fill her own coffers.Tell me whether judgment was due the nations, and whether they had to see their sin in the lurid light of Belgian and French battlefields; but do not overlook the fact that when the war finally ends, Benjamin, the worst offender, the greater sinner, goes down in the greatest judgment, and one day Benjamin’s soldiers are almost wiped from the earth! Out of 26,700, 25,000 and more perish. Tell us now whether judgment falls where judgment belongs!Take the late war. Again and again Germany was triumphant, but when the Allies had suffered sufficiently and had learned to lean not to themselves but upon the Lord; when, like Israel, they turned from hope in self and trusted in God, then God bared His arm in their behalf and Germany went down in defeat, a defeat that made their “come-back” impossible; a defeat that fastened upon them the tribute of years; a defeat that proved to them that, great as might have been the sins of the allied nations, greater still, in the sight of God, was their own sin; for final judgment is just judgment.God is not only in history; God has to do with the making of history. If men without a king “behave every one as is right in his own eyes”, the King of all kings, the Lord of all lords, will do that which will eventually seem right in the eyes of all angels and of all good men. That is GOD!

Judges 5:7

WIFE AND MOTHER. A MODEL IN BOTH (A Sermon to Women) 1 Peter 3:1-2; Judges 5:7. I WANT to speak as plainly today as is our wont in addressing the men. Our first text is addressed to the wives.“Ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the Word, they also may without the Word be won by the conversation of the wives”. In Peter’s mind the great work of the wife was to win her husband, and he understood that some graces were essential to that accomplishment.Affection is the first grace of a wife! The “subjection” mentioned in the text is not slavery, but the sweet service of love.“Love! of man’s life ’tis a thing apart, ’Tis woman’s whole existence.” And the model wife will make her husband feel that fact.She will set it forth in her tender care for him; in her tidy home; in her personal toilet; and in ten thousand unspeakable, yet eloquent, ways; and when there is opportunity she will whisper it into his ear in modest, yet unmistakable words. A woman, without this grace of affection, is a travesty upon her sex, and it’s a pity that she should ever be called a wife. Her coldness and indifference is a shroud for domestic happiness, and her cross looks and scolding words are nails for its coffin. Dr. Talmage says, “At the siege of Argus, Pyrrhus was killed by the tile off a roof, thrown by a woman; and Abimelech was slain by a stone that a woman threw from the tower of Thebes; and Earl Montfort was destroyed by a rock discharged at him by a woman from the walls of Toulouse. But without any weapon, save that of her cold, cheerless household arrangement, and slothful person, any wife may slay all the attractions of a home circle.”Her first duty is faithfulness.“Ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands”. New Testament teaching makes no provision for the so-called innocent flirtations in which some wives delight. Our modern amusements are traps set for the feet of many silly women. If Paul and Peter were alive today, and happened upon one of our 19th century dances, they would wonder whether the wives of many had ever heard of this Scripture, “Be in subjection to your own husbands”.Somebody has criticized the old “square dance” by saying that “the only danger from it is that the devil can easily cut the corners off, and make it round,” and it is well known that when he has accomplished that, he has laid the dynamite for loosening the foundations of many a happy home. The average play, put before the devotees of the theater, mocks at virtue, sets the social evils in tempting perspective, and sends many a new wife back to her home, half convinced that happiness is to be had by the sale of herself and the deception of him whom she has sworn to love.It is often remarked that our elite homes are not so happy as those of the commoner classes. The reasons are not far to seek! Chastity is more esteemed by the middle classes than by those that live the lives of butterflies, and the houses of the former have the firmer foundation in consequence.I am not among those who believe that the world is growing better.

I see progress in the Church of Christ, but the gilded vices of the present day give to me no promise of a golden age, save as they suggest that Christ must shortly come. I doubt if there was ever a time when virtue was a thing of commerce as at this present hour.

Our social order and our commercial arrangements, just as certainly as our methods of amusement, are tending to the tearing down of the strongholds of womanhood.Some years ago, Mrs. Henderson, of New York, a young widow, was among the unfortunate women who are thrown absolutely upon their own resources for a living. When she discovered that her salary would not support her in the plainest living, and reached the point where the “propositions” of her employer must be accepted, or starvation grappled with, she said, “I prefer death,” and flung herself from the attic window of her lodging house.They brought up her corpse from the street and buried it, but for every one such there are hundreds of others that love life so tenaciously that they make the greater sacrifice, and instead of casting themselves down three stories to the street below, they plunge into the very pit, destroying the soul to save the body; and to escape a coffin, bury themselves in the shroud of sin and the deepest grave that this world knows.For some of these one can only feel the profoundest pity, but for the wife whose only temptation to fall is her own lust, one feels contempt instead; and the godless world, in its utter indifference to righteousness, rises with condemnation on its lips; for whatever our philosophies may be, all men feel that faithfulness is a wife’s first duty.The first privilege of a wife is service. One of the temptations to which many of them are peculiarly subjected is selfishness. If I were asked the besetting sin of the sex, among those who are in comfortable circumstances, I would mention “selfishness.”The young wife in a comfortable home is related to the other members of the house much as the youngest, prettiest, or weakest child is. Her very sex invites petting and indulgence.

If she is wise and energetic, that will only contribute to her character and increase her happiness; but if she is selfish and opinionated, it will tend to turn her head and bring her to believe that she is something special, and a domestic disaster is the consequence.“Little Lucy Grieve,” by Mrs. Humphrey Ward, “is a fair representation of this class.

Lucy loved David, and knew his splendid superiority; and yet she loved herself so well that she was willing to sacrifice his finest feelings, obliterate his spirit of benevolence, and destroy the remnant of affection he bore to his own unfortunate sister, that she herself might be the better dressed, more advanced in society, and the more indulged in selfishness.Almost daily we see Lucy’s character illustrated in the conduct of the living.I have read a good many poems that tenderly plead with men to remember the wife’s cares, and be careful not to forget the caress; the wife’s labors, and lend her a lift when possible; the wife’s weariness, and overcome it by entering the house with a smile. I love all such verses! They strike in my heart a responsive cord!There is very little danger that the women God has given us will be loved or served too well. But some of these days I intend to turn poet myself, and pen some lines to women about their duties to husbands—who delve eight to sixteen hours a day to dress them elegantly, provide them happy homes, and keep them in continual joy.A husband gets tired sometimes. A husband meets in business the most vexatious problems, and in recent times many a husband has struggled under loads too heavy to be borne by mortal man. With the casting up of accounts daily, he has seen the fortune that cost him years of ceaseless toil, being cut down, threatened with utter wreck, and himself about to be branded with bankruptcy.

I agree with Henry Ward Beecher that there is no suffering out of hell much more difficult to endure than the business man’s experience, when a few days sweep from him the fortune won by weary years of labor, or when the position which he has held in honor is about to be taken from him, or the character that he has made by a course of unimpeachable conduct is about to be brought into disrepute. For a woman to come short of sympathy in an hour like that, or to insist upon an expense in excess of the income, or to pack her splendid trunk and take herself to the seaside to sport, while he, who lives for her sake, suffers, is to accept the most devilish suggestion and sell out for a paltry price her part in his affection, who would lay life on the altar of sacrifice in proof of his love.When I was in Chicago, my brother, Dr.

F. T. Riley, told me how he had been called into a home to administer an antidote to a poison a man had just taken.When he entered the house he found the man hidden in a dark room, with the door locked. At first he refused him admittance, but finally consented to let him come in, and after much persuasion, confessed that he had just taken a half vial of the deadly stuff, and when the doctor attempted to administer the antidote, he fought to such an extent that my brother was compelled to call in several others to assist him. When the emetic had done its work and Dr. Riley asked why he had taken the poison, the man said, “I have been out of employment for weeks. For my wife and child I see no prospect of a livelihood. I have an insurance of $3000.

I have fixed it so that I am certain that it will come into their possession in the instance of my death, and I would rather die and let them live.”Does the average woman appreciate her husband’s love—the depth of it, the sacrifice to which it calls its subject? “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”If you would be beautiful indeed, if you would be helpmate for your husband, forget yourself; sacrifice for his sake; give him your sympathy in his time of trouble. For the man struggling against adverse circumstances, there is more assistance in the sympathetic manner of an affectionate wife, than any bank beneath God’s stars can bring him. Speak your love in the very hour of his struggle and save him.It will do no good to weep at his coffin, or cover his grave with the flowers of insurance money. Better one word while he lives than a thousand sobs after he has gone. Better the flowers of your affection for one minute while he is above ground, than perennial roses on his grave.But the most solemn duty of a wife is to save her husband. Our text says, “If any obey not the Word, they also may without the Word be won by the conversation of the wives” (1 Peter 3:1).Of course Peter meant ‘won to Christ!” No matter what else you do for him, you have largely failed in the life-effort unless you take him to Heaven with you.In that task, you must never tire.

In that effort, you must never despair. He may be indifferent to God’s Word; then you must be Christ’s epistle to him.

He may hate the preacher; then your life must preach. He may despise the sight of a church-house; then you must make home a sanctuary of God’s presence. Wherever he goes, whatever he is, your prayers must follow him and your faith must prevail.Years ago, in the city of Chicago, a man gambled away ten thousand dollars in a day on the Chicago Board of Trade, and followed his loss with a stupendous drunk. He sought out an attorney to see if he could not recover this money. The lawyer was a man of God, and cared more to bring this soul to Christ than to get a client for himself. Instead of pleading for him before the judge, he pled with him for Jesus’ sake.

In the course of his conversation he said, “I gave my Bible away today, have you one?” To which the sobered man answered, “Yes, but it’s down in my trunk somewhere. I have been a bad man, Mr.

B–, but God gave me a blessed wife, and in spite of all my indifference and opposition to the truth, she never lets me leave home without packing that Bible into my trunk.” The attorney went to the hotel room and fished it out of the trunk and found it a beautiful Book. There were many marked passages in it; perfumed ribbons and pretty pressed flowers between the pages, which that Virginia girl had laid there with her own loving hand. When, after midnight, as the Christian lawyer turned the leaves of that Bible, and read to him the passages which his own wife had marked, the man broke down utterly and said,“Oh, Sir, pray for me! I want to be a Christian. For fourteen years I have despised that Book and treated it with neglect, and also the interest and affection which my wife has evidenced in putting it in my trunk. But now, Sir, I want to be a Christian; I want to be saved!”“The Book which her own beautiful hand has prepared shall be a blessed Bible to me!”For fourteen years she had known that he was neglecting it, and yet for fourteen years she had gone right on putting it in his trunk at every departure, marking new places, shedding new tears upon the sacred page and putting up new prayers to God that He would hear.And lo! at last, in a far city, by a strange hand, God brought that Book forth and opened it before his eyes, and the perfumed leaves and ribbons wafted to him the full story of her love, while the printed words spoke the eternal love of God; and the man who had so long faced toward hell, turned about and faced toward Home and Heaven—her Heaven.THE MODEL MOTHER “A mother in Israel” The first evidence of a model mother is the maternal spirit. That spirit is a virtue today as never before. The generation of women that loved children lived to bear the most of us, but in most instances are not worthily succeeded. The philosophy of the “first social circles” of today is childlessness, and that wretched philosophy has so far prevailed that children are coming to be regarded as social inconveniences and domestic nuisances. This is not natural, but is a result of the frivolous views society entertains of happiness, and the flippant price it puts upon human life.Nature looks in the opposite direction, as you may know by beholding the baby girl when she is surrounded by her dolls. And if mothers were either broadminded or warmhearted, and so kept by Godly philosophies as to rightly instruct their daughters, not one in a thousand of young married women would have a spirit averse to maternity.

But alas for the wretched philosophy that many, otherwise beautiful, mothers have brought to their own daughters—a philosophy that makes married life itself a thing of unhappy apprehension, that makes God’s best gift to parents an unwelcome arrival, and renders those appointed to handle immortality in its plastic state, unwilling to touch it at all. And this is not the worst; this philosophy goes so far with many a modern woman that there is need that those of us who stand in the pulpit thunder the commandment, “Thou shalt not kill”, and we might add, “Thou shalt not destroy thyself,” for infanticide is also matricide.The model mother must also remember that it is her commission to make character.

It is not enough to bring the little life into the world. Beauty must clothe it. When the mother caresses her own baby, she ought to know that she handles precious material in plastic state, and must account for what comes of it.Life is a cycle and the teaching of today will come back to you in the fixed form of twenty years hence.Nero’s mother was a murderess. No wonder at Nero. Byron’s mother was proud, ill-tempered, and violent. Therein is the explanation of poor Byron himself. George Washington’s mother was noble and pure. Therein is the explanation of Washington’s graces.

Walter Scott’s mother loved poetry and painting, and Scott’s proudest literary efforts were the result. Wesley’s mother was a Godlike woman. No wonder that John and Charles were the Christian men they were. Charles Spurgeon’s mother was famed for her graces. To such mothers God gives such sons.In reading Gordon’s life recently, I came upon that passage wherein he says, in writing to his wife and children, “I have spent two days here, much of the time alone in the dear home where mother spent her last years. So far as seeming lonely, I should be glad to spend days here where everything reminds me of the beloved one.

I have many times gone into her vacant bedroom, and kneeled where she so often knelt and prayed for her children. Her family was her parish; to them she ministered, and for them she ceased not to pray to the end.” A.

J. Gordon—God’s first American minister—was what he was, largely in consequence of that mother’s work.The model mother lives to make character. But, as with the wife, so the model mother’s most responsible office is to save.If you succeed in all else and fail in that, you would not be satisfied, nor would your children call you “blessed”.One of the most astonishing things is the circumstance that some women are content to bring mortal souls into the world, and so little concerned to get them home to God. In my work as a pastor, it is not the least unusual to meet mothers that love society above the souls of their own children, that positively oppose their becoming religious, that prefer they should go to the house of mirth rather than the place of preaching, sit before the most questionable theatrical performance, rather than in the sanctuary of the Most High, accept the embraces of lecherous men, in the dance, rather than the love of the Son of God. I know this is severe speech; but I also know that it is none too strong to express the real in life.Years since, a mother found her boy frequenting the Y. M.

C. A., and becoming much interested in the subject of Christianity.

She was sorely disappointed at this discovery. She had her heart set on making him a social beau and sending him into what she called the “first circles.” She rushed him off to Yale, and shortly she had her desire and more, for he was not only a society man, but accepted with it its cigars, social glass, and attendant evils. When she learned that he was drinking heavily, she sought to reclaim him by sending him many letters, but he tore them up without reading them, saying, “When I wanted to do right, mother opposed it. I don’t know why she should be solicitous now seeing I am going the way that she chose for me.” Finally he went away to Chicago and this woman visited Mr. Moody and begged him to seek him out and try to accomplish his salvation. Moody made an appointment with him, but the young man failed to keep it.

He says, “I tried a good many times to reach him after that, but could not. While I was travelling one day on the New Haven Road, I bought a New York paper and read in great head-lines that he had been drowned in Lake Michigan.

His father came on and carried the body back to Boston. The broken-hearted mother, when she saw him lowered into the grave, said in sobs, ‘Oh, if I had only helped him when he wanted to be holy! If I could think now that he was in Heaven, I would have peace. It was my conduct that costs me all this, and my sorrow shall never cease.’ ”There are many mothers who have little disposition to see their children saved, but for their paltry frivolities, pay the price of these mortal souls.I thank God, on the other hand that there are many mothers who will never be satisfied unless they can bring up the last boy and the last girl God has given them, in the beauty of holiness, into Heaven.The quaint John Randolph said, “When I try to make myself an infidel, I feel the hand of mother on my head, and hear her prayers for my soul, and start back from all infidelity.”One winter, while aiding in a meeting in Illinois, an Englishman told me the story of his conversion, and said, “I came away to America a godless boy. One day I got a letter from my brother reporting the news. After having finished it, he added a postscript, ‘Mother is still praying for you.’ I could visualize her at the bedside on bended knees. From that hour I was under conviction of sin and could not be satisfied until I had found in Jesus my Saviour.”