Jeremiah 49:27 — Word Study
WLCוְהִצַּ֥תִּי אֵ֖שׁ בְּחוֹמַ֣ת דַּמָּ֑שֶׂק וְאָכְלָ֖ה אַרְמְנ֥וֹת בֶּן־ הֲדָֽד׃ ס
BSAI will set fireyâtsath [kindle, ignite a flame] to the wallschôwmâh [strong fortifications, city defenses] of DamascusDammeseq [the capital city of Syria] it will consumeʼâkal [devour, eat away] the fortressesʼarmôwn [citadels, strongholds] of Ben-hadadBen-Hădad [son of the false god Hadad, a Syrian king]
| Greek | English | Parsing |
|---|---|---|
| וְהִצַּ֥תִּי | and I will kindle | Verb, Hiphil, sequential perfect first person common singular |
| אֵ֖שׁ | a fire | Noun common, both singular absolute |
| בְּחוֹמַ֣ת | at [the] wall of | Preposition, noun common feminine singular construct |
| דַּמָּ֑שֶׂק | Damascus | Noun proper |
| וְאָכְלָ֖ה | and it will consume | Verb, Qal, sequential perfect third person feminine singular |
| אַרְמְנ֥וֹת | [the] fortresses of | Noun common, feminine plural construct |
| בֶּן־ | Ben | Noun proper masculine |
| הֲדָֽד׃ ס | Hadad | Noun proper masculine |
Every word in the verse. Click a row to open it in the panel on the left.
| BSB | “I will set fire to the walls of Damascus; it will consume the fortresses of Ben-hadad.” |
| KJV | And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Ben-hadad. |
| ASV | And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it shall devour the palaces of Ben-hadad. |
| YLT | And I have kindled a fire against the wall of Damascus, And it consumed palaces of Ben-Hadad!' |
| WEB | “I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it will devour the palaces of Ben Hadad.” |
| BBE | And I will have a fire lighted on the wall of Damascus, burning up the great houses of Ben-hadad. |
Where they part company is in the rendering of וְאָכְלָ֖ה — see How Translations Differ.
The sentence contains two main clauses, each describing an action that God will take against Damascus and its fortifications.







8 commentators on this verse
Gill, Jamieson, Poole, Trapp & more — read them ›
clause
verbיָצַת
The sentence as the grammar sees it Open the tree ›
Every word here is used elsewhere in the Old Testament.
Bars are logarithmic — אֵת, the commonest word in the Hebrew Bible, stands about 11,000 times, so a linear scale would leave everything else invisible. Click a row to open that word.
Deep Study — Jeremiah 49:27
Sections marked generated are written from the data on this page rather than by a named author. Everything else — the lexicon entries, the cross references, the manuscript readings, the counts — is quoted from its source unchanged.
Context — Prophecy Against Damascusgenerated
Jeremiah 49:27 is a declaration from the LORD concerning the city of Damascus, indicating that its walls will be set on fire and its fortresses destroyed. This prophecy highlights the fate of cities that oppose God and serves as a warning to others. The surrounding verses elaborate on the consequences faced by those who defy divine authority, emphasizing the certainty of judgment.
Cross References
| Reference | Text (BSB) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amos 1:3–5 | This is what the LORD says: “For three transgressions of Damascus, even four, I will not revoke My judgment, because they threshed Gilead with sledges of iron. |
| 2 | 1 Kings 15:18–20 | So Asa withdrew all the silver and gold that remained in the treasuries of the house of the LORD and the royal palace. He entrusted it to his servants and sent them with this message to Ben-hadad son of Tabrimmon, the son of Hezion king of Aram, who was ruling in Damascus: |
| 3 | 1 Kings 20:1–22 | Now Ben-hadad king of Aram assembled his entire army. Accompanied by thirty-two kings with their horses and chariots, he marched up, besieged Samaria, and waged war against it. |
| 4 | 2 Kings 13:5 | So the LORD gave Israel a deliverer, and they escaped the power of the Arameans. Then the people of Israel lived in their own homes as they had before. |
The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge — 4 references, hung on the phrase they belong to
The Key Word — וְהִצַּ֥תִּי, ve.hi.Tza.tigenerated
The word וְהִצַּ֥תִּי (ve.hi.Tza.ti) is a perfect form of the verb יָצַת (yatsath), meaning 'to kindle' or 'to set on fire.' This verb is used in the Hiphil stem, indicating a causative action where the subject causes something to happen, in this case, igniting the fire.
This word conveys a strong sense of intentionality behind the act of destruction. The use of the first person singular indicates that it is the LORD Himself who will perform this act, emphasizing His authority and power over the fate of cities.
How Translations Differ — measured against the Berean Standard Biblegenerated
This study reads the verse in the Berean Standard Bible, which uses the word set fire.
Sentence Structuregenerated
The verse is structured around two main verbs: וְהִצַּ֥תִּי (and I will kindle) and וְאָכְלָ֖ה (and it will consume). The first verb sets the action of igniting the fire, while the second describes the result of that action.
The prepositional phrase בְּחוֹמַ֣ת דַּמָּ֑שֶׂק (at the wall of Damascus) specifies the location of the action, indicating that the fire will be set at the city's fortifications.
Septuagint Backgroundgenerated
The Septuagint translates וְהִצַּ֥תִּי as καύσω, which also means 'I will burn.' This choice aligns closely with the Hebrew meaning, emphasizing the act of destruction.
The translation of אָכְלָ֖ה as καταφάγεται suggests a consuming or devouring action, reinforcing the imagery of total destruction.
In plain words — the whole versegenerated
Jeremiah 49:27 shows God's judgment against Damascus, declaring that He will set fire to its walls and consume the fortresses of Ben-hadad. This verse illustrates the consequences of defiance against God and serves as a warning to other nations.
Frequently Asked Questionsgenerated
This indicates a coming judgment where God will destroy the city's defenses, symbolizing His power over nations.
Ben-hadad refers to a Syrian king, whose fortresses are mentioned as targets of God's judgment.
Fire symbolizes destruction and judgment, often representing God's anger and the consequences of sin.
Similar themes of judgment against cities can be found in other prophetic texts, such as in Amos and 1 Kings.
Reflection Questionsgenerated
- What does this prophecy teach us about God's authority over nations?
- How can we understand the symbolism of fire in our own lives?
- In what ways do we see the consequences of defiance against God in our world today?
- How can this verse encourage us to seek God's protection rather than relying on our own defenses?
Commentators on this verse — 8 expositors, verse by verse
Each of these wrote on Jeremiah 49:27 itself, not merely on the chapter around it.
John Gill1697–1771Gill's Exposition of the Entire BibleAnd I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus,.... Signifying either that, a breach being made there the destruction of the city should begin, and be carried on until it was completed; or it may
Read John Gill on Jeremiah 49 →
Robert Jamieson1802–1880Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown's CommentaryAnd I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Ben-ha'dad.
Read Robert Jamieson on Jeremiah 49 →
Matthew Poole1624–1679Matthew Poole's Commentary on the Holy BibleI will bring a judgment that shall burn in Damascus like a consuming fire, and it shall reach to the royal seat of Benhadad; either that which was the royal seat of Ben-hadad, , or else Ben-hadad (signifying the son of Hadad, which was their idol) was the common name of all the kings of Syria, as Pharaoh was to the kings of Egypt,
Read Matthew Poole on Jeremiah 49 →
John Trapp1601–1669Trapp's Complete Commentary on the Old and New TestamentsJeremiah 49:27 And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Benhadad.Ver. 27. And I will kindle a fire.] See on Amos 1:4.
Read John Trapp on Jeremiah 49 →
Charles John Ellicott1819–1905Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers(27) It shall consume the palaces of Ben-ha-dad.—Three kings of the name appear in Old Testament history; one as warring against Omri (1 Kings 20:34), another as a contemporary of Elisha (2 Kings 8:7), a third as the son of Hazael, and therefore belonging to a different dynasty (2 Kings 13:3). It is possible, as the name was thus associated with the greatness of the kingdom, that it may have been borne also by later kings. It appears in the form Ben-hidri in Assyrian inscriptions. The prophet’s words are, at any rate, a proof that the palaces of Damascus were either built by one of them, probably the first, or at any rate bore their name.
Read Charles John Ellicott on Jeremiah 49 →
AdamClarkeAdam Clarke's Commentary on the BibleVerse 27. The palaces of Ben-hadad.] Damascus was a seat of the Syrian kings, and Ben-hadad was a name common to several of its kings.
Read AdamClarke on Jeremiah 49 →
CambridgeThe Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges27. I will kindle a fire] Cp. Numbers 21:28; Deuteronomy 32:22. Benhadad (son of Hadad) was the name of several kings of Syria. palaces] See on Jeremiah 6:5.
Read Cambridge on Jeremiah 49 →
Albert Barnes1798–1870Barnes' Notes on the BibleSee the marginal reference and 1 Kings 11:14 note.
Read Albert Barnes on Jeremiah 49 →The verse in English, compared — 17 translations, and where they part company
Every translation on this page is a decision someone had to make and commit to. Read down a column and you see one translator's judgement; read across a row and you see the range the Greek actually allows. The BSB is the wording the rest of this page is measured against, so it is listed first.
Modern formal
“I will set fire to the walls of Damascus; it will consume the fortresses of Ben-hadad.”
“I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it will devour the palaces of Ben Hadad.”
“I will set fire to the walls of Damascus; it will consume the fortresses of Ben-hadad.”
“I will set fire to the walls of Damascus; it will burn up the palaces of Ben Hadad.”
Tyndale line
And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Ben-hadad.
And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it shall devour the palaces of Ben-hadad.
And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it shall devour the palaces of Ben-hadad.
And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Ben-hadad.
And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, which shall cosume the palaces of Benhadad.
Strictly literal
And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Ben-Hadad.
And I have kindled a fire against the wall of Damascus, And it consumed palaces of Ben-Hadad!'
And I have kindled a fire against the wall of Damascus, || And it consumed palaces of Ben-Hadad!”
And I will kindle a fire on the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Ben-hadad.
“For I will light a fire on the wall of Damascus, and it will devour the strongholds of Ben Hadad.”
From the Latin
And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, rind it shall devour the strong holds of Benadad.
Simplified
I'm going to set fire to the walls of Damascus; that will burn down the fortresses of Ben-hadad.
And I will have a fire lighted on the wall of Damascus, burning up the great houses of Ben-hadad.
Counted from the translations carried on this site, not from a survey of every English Bible. A rendering shared by many versions is usually inherited rather than independently arrived at — the Tyndale line in particular runs through most of them.
The sentence as the grammar sees it — from the MACULA Hebrew treebank
This is not our own analysis: it is the scholarly syntax tree for the verse, showing how the clause actually holds together.
Boxes are the grammarian's groupings — clause, noun phrase, prepositional phrase.
The four witnesses to this verse — Masoretic, Septuagint, Samaritan, Qumran
The Masoretic Text and the Septuagint largely agree in their wording, with six of the eight words matched. The differences lie primarily in the arrangement and syntax, with the Septuagint presenting a different order but conveying the same essential message.
וְהִצַּ֥תִּי אֵ֖שׁ בְּחוֹמַ֣ת דַּמָּ֑שֶׂק וְאָכְלָ֖ה אַרְמְנ֥וֹת בֶּן־ הֲדָֽד׃ ס
6 of the 8 words are matched. This is the word-by-word correspondence, not the Septuagint's own sentence — its word order and its articles are its own.
Four traditions, not one. “On the leather” means the letters physically survive on the scroll, as against letters an editor has supplied to fill a hole in it — a restoration is a scholar’s reading, not a reading of the manuscript. Words in [square brackets] are supplied; the notes count them apart from what survives.
The map of this verse — what each word keeps company with
This is a map of two things, both counted rather than judged. Company kept: which words stand within three words of each of these, anywhere in the Hebrew Bible — the thicker the line, the more often the pair meet compared with chance. Built from: the words a word is made out of, taken from its own Strong’s entry. It is not a map of meaning: nothing here claims two words mean the same thing. Click any circle to see the numbers behind it.
Lexicons — every word in Jeremiah 49:27
One dossier per word, with every reference work grouped by kind — Hebrew lexicons, morphology, Bible dictionaries, topical chains and the English of the translators themselves. The verse sits at the head of each block with the word under study lit, so you never lose your place. The panel above gives the short answer; this is the long one, and it is the part of the page worth indexing.
Every entry below is the lexicographer's own text. On the Hebrew: Brown-Driver-Briggs entire and its gloss set, Strong's Hebrew Dictionary, and Tyndale House's Translators Brief lexicon. Where a cell says a work has no entry, that work genuinely has none for this word.
יָצַת (yatsath) is a Hebrew verb meaning to kindle or burn. It can refer to the act of setting something on fire, as well as figuratively to desolation. The word has different forms: Qal (to kindle), Niphal (to be kindled or desolate), and Hiphil (to set on fire).
[יָצַת] vb. kindle, burn (intr.)
Qal kindle, intr., fig. of wickedness; sq. be kindled with fire (= set on fire)
Niph. be kindled; be burned; = desolated
Hiph. kindle, set on fire
base
H3341 [יָצַת] kindle, burn (intr.)
3341 yatsath yaw-tsath'
a primitive root; to burn or set on fire; figuratively, to
desolate:--burn (up), be desolate, set (on) fire ((fire)),
kindle.
יָצַת (ya.tsat) — to kindle.
1) to kindle, burn, set on fire
1a) (Qal) to kindle
1b) (Niphal)
1b1) to be kindled
1b2) to be left desolate
1c) (Hiphil) to set on fire, kindle
Conj | V-Hiphil-1cs — Verb · Hiphil · sequential perfect first person common singularHc/Vhq1cs
אֵשׁ (esh) means 'fire' and encompasses various types, including natural fire, supernatural fire associated with divine appearances, and fire used for cooking or on altars. It can also figuratively represent God's anger. The entries consistently highlight its literal and metaphorical uses, with no significant disagreement among lexicons.
אֵשׁ 377 n.f. fire
fire, of conflagration
of supernatural fire
fire for cooking, roasting, parching
esp. of altar fire
fig. of Yahweh's anger
in various combinations
base
H784 אֵשׁ fire . fire, of conflagration
. of supernatural fire
. fire for cooking, roasting, parching
. esp. of altar fire
. fig. of Yahweh's anger
. in various combinations
784 'esh aysh
a primitive word; fire (literally or figuratively):--
burning, fiery, fire, flaming, hot.
אֵשׁ (esh) — fire.
1) fire
1a) fire, flames
1b) supernatural fire (accompanying theophany)
1c) fire (for cooking, roasting, parching)
1d) altar-fire
1e) God's anger (fig.)
Aramaic equivalent: esh (אֶשָּׁא "fire" H0785)
HNcbsa — Noun common · both singular absoluteHNcbsa
fir ('esh; pur):
These are the common words for fire, occurring very frequently. 'Ur, "light" (Isa 24:15 the King James Version; compare the Revised Version (British and American); Isa 31:9, and see FIRES), nur (Aramaic) (Da 3:22 ff) are found a few times, also 'eshshah (Jer 6:29), and be`erah (Ex 22:6), once each. Ac 28:2,3 has pura, "pyre," and Mr 14:54; Lu 22:56, phos, "light," the Revised Version (British and American) "in the light (of the fire)." "To set…
Fire
(1.) For sacred purposes. The sacrifices were consumed by fire (Gen. 8:20). The ever-burning fire on the altar was first kindled from heaven (Lev. 6:9, 13; 9:24), and afterwards rekindled at the dedication of Solomon’s temple (2 Chr. 7:1, 3). The expressions “fire from heaven” and “fire of the Lord” generally denote lightning, but sometimes also the fire of the altar was so called (Ex. 29:18; Lev. 1:9; 2:3; 3:5, 9).
Fire for a sacred purpose obtained otherwise than from the altar was called “strange fire” (Lev. 10:1, 2;
is represented as the symbol of Jehovah’s presence and the instrument of his power, in the way either of approval or of destruction. (Exodus 3:2; 14:19) etc. There could not be a better symbol for Jehovah than this of fire, it being immaterial, mysterious, but visible, warming, cheering, comforting, but also terrible and consuming. Parallel with this application of fire and with its symbolical meaning are to be noted the similar use for sacrificial purposes and the respect paid to it, or to the heavenly bodies as symbols of deity, which prevailed among so many nations of antiquity, and of which the traces are not even now extinct; e.g. the Sabean and Magian systems of worship. (Isaiah 27:9) Fire for sacred purposes obtained elsewhere than from the altar was called "strange fire," and for the use of such Nadab and Abihu were punished…
In Scripture, is often connected with the presence of Jehovah; as in the burning bush, and on Mount Sinai, Ex 3:2 19:18 Ps 18:1-50 Hab 1:1-3:19. The second coming of Christ will be "in flaming fire," 2Th 1:8. In the New Testament it illustrates the enlightening, cheering, and purifying agency of the Holy Spirit, Mt 3:11 Ac 2:3. By sending fire from heaven to consume sacrifices, God often signified his acceptance of them: as in the case of Abel, Ge 4:4; Abraham, Ge…
חוֹמָה (chowmah) refers to a wall, typically understood as a protective barrier. It is derived from a root meaning to join, and is often used to describe city walls or the walls of buildings. The term can also be applied figuratively, such as in reference to the waters of the Red Sea.
חוֹמָה 133 n.f. wall (as protection)
usu. term for wall of city
wall of a building
fig. of waters of Red Sea
base
H2346 חוֹמָה wall (as protection)
2346 chowmah kho-maw'
feminine active participle of an unused root apparently
meaning to join; a wall of protection:--wall, walled.
חוֹמָה (cho.mah) — wall.
wall
חוֹמָה (cho.mah) — (Broad) Wall.
wall
Combined with ra.chav (רָחָב "Broad" H7342)
Prep | N-fs — Preposition · noun common feminine singular constructHR/Ncfsc
ov:
(1) In Anglo-Saxon, had the meaning "from," "away from" (as the strengthened form "off" has still), and was not used for genitive or possessive relations, these being expressed by special case-forms. In the Norman period, however, "of" was taken to represent the French de (a use well developed by the time of Chaucer), and in the Elizabethan period both senses of "of" were in common use. But after about 1600 the later force of the word became predominant, and in the earlier sense (which is now practically obsolete) it was replaced by other prepositions. In consequence the King James Version (and in some cases the Revised Version (British and American)) contains many uses of "of" that are no longer familiar--most of them, to be sure, causing no difficulty, but there still being a few responsible for real obscurities.
OF, preposition ov. [Gr.]
1. From or out of; proceeding from, as the cause, source, means, author or agent bestowing.
I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered to you. 1 Corinthians 11:1.
For it was of the Lord to harden their hearts. Joshua 11:1.
It is of the Lord's mercies that we are not consumed.
Lamentations 3:1.
The whole disposing thereof is of the Lord. Proverbs 16:1.
Go, inquire of the Lord for me. 2 Chronicles 34:2.
That holy thing that shall be born of thee. Luke 1:1.
Hence of is the sign of the genitive case, the case that denotes production; as the son of man, the son proceeding from man, produced from man. This is the primary sense, although we now say, produced by man. 'Part of these were slain; ' that is, a number separate, for part denotes a division; the sense then is, a number from or out of the whole were slain. So also, 'some of these were slain; ' that is…
דַּמֶּשֶׂק (Dammeseq) refers to Damascus, an ancient city in Syria known for its significance as a trading center. The name is thought to mean 'silent is the sackcloth weaver.' It appears in various contexts in the Old Testament, emphasizing its historical prominence.
דַּמֶּ֫שֶׂק n.pr.loc. Damascus
base
H1834 דַּמֶּשֶׂק Damascus
1834 Dammeseq dam-meh'-sek
or Duwmeseq {doo-meh'-sek}; or Darmeseq {dar-meh'-sek}; of
foreign origin; Damascus, a city of Syria:--Damascus.
דַּמֶּ֫שֶׂק (dam.me.seq) — Damascus.
§ Damascus = "silent is the sackcloth weaver"
an ancient trading city, capital of Syria, located in the plain east of Hermon, 130 (205 km) miles northeast of Jerusalem
N-proper — Noun properHNpl
da-mas'-kus:
1. The Name
2. Situation and Natural Features
3. The City Itself
4. Its History
(1) The Early Period (to circa 950 BC)
(2) The Aramean Kingdom (circa 950-732 BC)
(3) The Middle Period (732 BC-650 AD)
(4) Under Islam
1. Name:
The English name is the same as the Greek Damaskos. The Hebrew name is Dammeseq, but the Aramaic form Darmeseq, occurs in 1Ch 18:5; 2Ch 28:5. The name appears in Egyptian inscriptions as Ti-mas-ku (16th century BC), and Sa-ra-mas-ki (13th century BC), which W. M. Muller, Asien u. Europa, 227, regards as representing Ti-ra-mas-ki, concluding from the "ra" in this form that Damascus had by that time passed under Aramaic influence. In the Tell el-Amarna Letters the forms Ti-ma-as-gi and Di-mas-ka occur. The Arabic name is Dimashk esh-Sham ("Damascus of Syria")…
Damascus
Activity, the most ancient of Oriental cities; the capital of Syria (Isa. 7:8; 17:3); situated about 133 miles to the north of Jerusalem. Its modern name is Esh-Sham; i.e., “the East.”
The situation of this city is said to be the most beautiful of all Western Asia. It is mentioned among the conquests of the Egyptian king Thothmes III. (B.C. 1500), and in the Amarna tablets (B.C. 1400).
It is first mentioned in Scripture in connection with Abraham’s victory over the confederate kings under Chedorlaomer (Gen. 14:15). It was the native place of Abraham’s steward (15:2). It is not again noticed till the time of David, when “the Syrians of Damascus came to succour Hadadezer” (q.v.), 2 Sam. 8:5;
one of the most ancient and most important of the cities of Syria. It is situated 130 miles northeast of Jerusalem, in a plain of vast size and of extreme fertility, which lies east of the great chain of Anti-Libanus, on the edge of the desert. This fertile plain, which is nearly circular and about 30 miles in diameter, is due to the river Barada , which is probably the "Abana" of Scripture. Two other streams the Wady Helbon upon the north and the Awaj, which flows direct from Hermon upon the south, increase the fertility of the Damascene plain, and contend for the honor of representing the "Pharpar" of Scripture. According to Josephus, Damascus was founded by Uz grandson of Shem. It is first mentioned in Scripture in connection with Abraham, (Genesis 14:15) whose steward was a native of the place. (
A celebrated metropolis of Syria, first mentioned in Ge 14:15 15:2, and now probably the oldest city on the globe. It stands on the river Barada, the ancient Chrysorrhoas, in a beautiful and fertile plain on the east and south east of Anti-Lebanon. See ABANA, and Pharpar. This plain is about fifty miles in circumference; it is open to the desert of Arabiaon the south and east, and is bounded on the other sides by the mountains. The region around and north of Damascus, including probably the valley between the ridges of Lebanon and Anti-Lebanon, is called in the Scriptures, "Syria of Damascus," 2Sa 8:5, and by Strabo, Coelesyria. This city, which at first had its own kings, was taken by David, 2Sa 8:5,6; and by Jeroboam
אָכַל (akal) means 'to eat' and encompasses a wide range of meanings, including literal consumption by humans and animals, as well as figurative uses like devouring by fire or destruction. It can describe actions such as feeding or causing to eat, and it also appears in contexts of oppression and destruction. The verb has various forms, indicating different subjects and nuances.
אָכַל 806 vb. eat
Qal
eat, human subject
of beasts, birds, etc., eat, devour
fig. of fire, devour, consume
of sword, devour, slay
in genl., devour, consume, destroy
fig. of oppression, devour the poor
Niph.
be eaten by man
be devoured by fire, consumed
be wasted, destroyed, of flesh
Pu. be consumed
Hiph.
cause to eat, feed with
cause to devoure, obj. sword
base
H398 אָכַל eat .. eat, human subject
. of beasts, birds, etc., eat, devour
. fig. of fire, devour, consume
. of sword, devour, slay
. in genl., devour, consume, destroy
. fig. of oppression, devour the poor
. . be eaten by man
. be devoured by fire, consumed
. be wasted, destroyed, of flesh
. be consumed
. . cause to eat, feed with
. cause to devoure, obj. sword
398 'akal aw-kal'
a primitive root; to eat (literally or figuratively):--X at
all, burn up, consume, devour(-er, up), dine, eat(-er, up),
feed (with), food, X freely, X in...wise(-deed, plenty), (lay)
meat, X quite.
אָכַל (a.khal) — to eat.
1) to eat, devour, burn up, feed
1a) (Qal)
1a1) to eat (human subject)
1a2) to eat, devour (of beasts and birds)
1a3) to devour, consume (of fire)
1a4) to devour, slay (of sword)
1a5) to devour, consume, destroy (inanimate subjects - ie, pestilence, drought)
1a6) to devour (of oppression)
1b) (Niphal)
1b1) to be eaten (by men)
1b2) to be devoured, consumed (of fire)
1b3) to be wasted, destroyed (of flesh)
1c) (Pual)
1c1) to cause to eat, feed with
1c2) to cause to devour
1d) (Hiphil)
1d1) to feed
1d2) to cause to eat
1e) (Piel)
1e1) consume
Aramaic equivalent: a.khal (אֲכַל "to devour" H0399)
Conj | V-Qal-3fs — Verb · Qal · sequential perfect third person feminine singularHc/Vqq3fs
kon-sum' (akhal, kalah, tamam; analisko): In Old Testament 'akhal ("to eat," "devour") occurs very frequently, and is translated "consumed" (Ge 31:40; Ex 15:7; Ps 78:63, etc.); kalah ("to finish") is also frequently translated "consume," "consumed" (Ge 41:30; Ex 32:10; Ps 59:13, etc.); tamam, "to be perfect," "finished" (Nu 17:13; De 2:15; Ps 73:19, etc.). There are many other words translated "consume"…
אַרְמוֹן (armown) refers to a citadel, castle, or palace, indicating a structure that is elevated or fortified. This term is primarily found in the prophetic books of the Old Testament, particularly in Amos and Jeremiah, and it is noted that it was not used before the royal period. The entries consistently emphasize its meanings related to fortifications and royal residences.
אַרְמוֹן n.m. citadel—citadel, castle, palace, not used before royal period, mostly in prophets, esp. common in Am & Je
base
H759 אַרְמוֹן citadel—citadel, castle, palace, not used before royal period, mostly in prophets, esp. common in Am & Je
759 'armown ar-mone'
from an unused root (meaning to be elevated); a citadel (from
its height):--castle, palace. Compare 2038.
see HEBREW for 02038
אַרְמוֹן (ar.mon) — citadel: palace.
: palace
citadel, palace, fortress
Also means: ar.mon (אַרְמוֹן ": fortress" H0759H)
אַרְמוֹן (ar.mon) — citadel: fortress.
: palace
citadel, palace, fortress
A sub-meaning of ar.mon (אַרְמוֹן ": palace" H0759)
N-mp — Noun common · feminine plural constructHNcfpc
ov:
(1) In Anglo-Saxon, had the meaning "from," "away from" (as the strengthened form "off" has still), and was not used for genitive or possessive relations, these being expressed by special case-forms. In the Norman period, however, "of" was taken to represent the French de (a use well developed by the time of Chaucer), and in the Elizabethan period both senses of "of" were in common use. But after about 1600 the later force of the word became predominant, and in the earlier sense (which is now practically obsolete) it was replaced by other prepositions. In consequence the King James Version (and in some cases the Revised Version (British and American)) contains many uses of "of" that are no longer familiar--most of them, to be sure, causing no difficulty, but there still being a few responsible for real obscurities.
OF, preposition ov. [Gr.]
1. From or out of; proceeding from, as the cause, source, means, author or agent bestowing.
I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered to you. 1 Corinthians 11:1.
For it was of the Lord to harden their hearts. Joshua 11:1.
It is of the Lord's mercies that we are not consumed.
Lamentations 3:1.
The whole disposing thereof is of the Lord. Proverbs 16:1.
Go, inquire of the Lord for me. 2 Chronicles 34:2.
That holy thing that shall be born of thee. Luke 1:1.
Hence of is the sign of the genitive case, the case that denotes production; as the son of man, the son proceeding from man, produced from man. This is the primary sense, although we now say, produced by man. 'Part of these were slain; ' that is, a number separate, for part denotes a division; the sense then is, a number from or out of the whole were slain. So also, 'some of these were slain; ' that is…
בֶּן־הֲדַד (ben-hadad) means 'son of Hadad,' referring to several kings of Syria. It is derived from the words for 'son' (ben) and the name of the false god Hadad. This name appears in the context of the Divided Monarchy, with notable figures including a king contemporary with Asa of Judah and another son of Hazael.
בֶּן־הֲדַד n.pr.m. (appar. son of (god) Hadad) name for king of Aram
time of Asa & Baasha
son of 1.
son of Hazael
base
H1130 בֶּן־הֲדַד
1130 Ben-Hadad ben-had-ad'
from 1121 and 1908; son of Hadad; Ben-Hadad, the name of
several Syrian kings:--Ben-hadad.
see HEBREW for 01121
see HEBREW for 01908
בֶּן־הֲדַד (ben-ha.dad) — Ben-hadad.
A man living at the time of Divided Monarchy, first mentioned at 1Ki.15.18;
son of: Tabrimmon (H2886)
§ Ben-hadad = "son of [the false god] Hadad"
1) the king of Syria, contemporary with Asa of Judah
2) the son of Hazael, also king of Syria
בֶּן־הֲדַד (ben-ha.dad) — Ben-hadad.
A man living at the time of Divided Monarchy, first mentioned at 2Ki.6.24
§ Ben-hadad = "son of [the false god] Hadad"
1) the king of Syria, contemporary with Asa of Judah
2) the son of Hazael, also king of Syria
בֶּן־הֲדַד (ben-ha.dad) — Ben-hadad.
A man living at the time of Divided Monarchy, first mentioned at 2Ki.13.3;
son of: Hazael (H2371)
§ Ben-hadad = "son of [the false god] Hadad"
1) the king of Syria, contemporary with Asa of Judah
2) the son of Hazael, also king of Syria
N-proper — Noun proper masculineHNpm
Ben (prefix) (singular ben, "son of"; plural bene, "sons of" = Aramaic bar): This word is used in the singular or plural to express relationship of almost any kind:
(1) to a person; as such it is found as part of many compound names like Benjamin, Benhur, etc. (compare Bar);
(2) to a clan; in this connection it is found in the plural only: "children of Israel," "children of Ammon," etc.;
(3) to a town; perhaps as place of birth ("son of Jabesh"; 2Ki 15:10 ff);
(4) to occupation, state of life, age, character, quality even of things;
(5) peculiarly employed in the sense of "scholar disciple" ("son of prophet"), or in phrases like "son of death," etc.;
(6) in poetry, "sons of flame" for "sparks" (Job 5:7 margin), etc. The frequent metaphorical use of the word indicates that it was rarely…
בֶּן־הֲדַד (ben-hadad) means 'son of Hadad,' referring to several kings of Syria. It is derived from the words for 'son' (ben) and the name of the false god Hadad. This name appears in the context of the Divided Monarchy, with notable figures including a king contemporary with Asa of Judah and another son of Hazael.
בֶּן־הֲדַד n.pr.m. (appar. son of (god) Hadad) name for king of Aram
time of Asa & Baasha
son of 1.
son of Hazael
base
H1130 בֶּן־הֲדַד
1130 Ben-Hadad ben-had-ad'
from 1121 and 1908; son of Hadad; Ben-Hadad, the name of
several Syrian kings:--Ben-hadad.
see HEBREW for 01121
see HEBREW for 01908
בֶּן־הֲדַד (ben-ha.dad) — Ben-hadad.
A man living at the time of Divided Monarchy, first mentioned at 1Ki.15.18;
son of: Tabrimmon (H2886)
§ Ben-hadad = "son of [the false god] Hadad"
1) the king of Syria, contemporary with Asa of Judah
2) the son of Hazael, also king of Syria
בֶּן־הֲדַד (ben-ha.dad) — Ben-hadad.
A man living at the time of Divided Monarchy, first mentioned at 2Ki.6.24
§ Ben-hadad = "son of [the false god] Hadad"
1) the king of Syria, contemporary with Asa of Judah
2) the son of Hazael, also king of Syria
בֶּן־הֲדַד (ben-ha.dad) — Ben-hadad.
A man living at the time of Divided Monarchy, first mentioned at 2Ki.13.3;
son of: Hazael (H2371)
§ Ben-hadad = "son of [the false god] Hadad"
1) the king of Syria, contemporary with Asa of Judah
2) the son of Hazael, also king of Syria
HNpm — Noun proper masculineHNpm
ha'-dad:
(1) (chadhadh, "sharpness"): One of the twelve sons of Ishmael (Ge 25:15, where the King James Version, following a mistake in Hebrew text, has "Hadar"; but "Hadad" is found in parallel passage 1Ch 1:30; the Revised Version (British and American) reads "Hadad" in both places).
(2) (hadhadh): A king of Edom, son of Bedad (Ge 36:35,36 parallel 1Ch 1:46,47), "who smote Midian in the field of Moab," and whose "city was Avith."
Hadad
Adod, brave(?), the name of a Syrian god. (1.) An Edomite king who defeated the Midianites (Gen. 36:35; 1 Chr. 1:46).
(2.) Another Edomite king (1 Chr. 1:50, 51), called also Hadar (Gen. 36:39; 1 Chr. 1:51).
(3.) One of “the king’s seed in Edom.” He fled into Egypt, where he married the sister of Pharaoh’s wife (1 Kings 11:14-22). He became one of Solomon’s adversaries.
Hadad, sharp, (a different name in Hebrew from the preceding), one of the sons of Ishmael (1 Chr. 1:30). Called also Hadar (
(mighty), originally the indigenous appellation of the sun among the Syrians, and thence transferred to the king as the highest of earthly authorities. The title appears to have been an official one, like Pharaoh. It is found occasionally in the altered form Hadar. (Genesis 25:15; 36:39) compared with 1Chr 1:30,50 Son of Ishmael. (Genesis 25:15; 1 Chronicles 1:30) A king of Edom who gained an important victory over the Midianites on the field of Moab. (Genesis 36:35; 1 Chronicles 1:46) Also a king of Edom, with Pau for his capital. (
1. An Idumean prince, who defeated the Midianites in the plains of Moab, Ge 36:35 1Ch 1:16.
2. A second prince of Edom, mentioned in 1Ch 1:51.
3. Another Edomite of the royal family, who fled to Egypt while young, upon David’s conquest of Edom, 2Sa 8:14; was well received, and married the queen’s sister. After the death of David and Joab, he returned to Edom and made an ineffectual effort to throw off the yoke of Solomon, 1Ki 11:14-22 2Ch 8:17.
