Menu

103 Sermon Illustrations on Tongue

103 illustrations Page 3 of 3

The tongue symbolizes the power of speech and its profound impact on life and faith, as emphasized in James 3:1-12. Christian preaching often portrays the tongue as a small but potent member that can both bless and curse, using vivid images like a fire or a rudder to illustrate its influence over the whole person (James 3:5-6). Control of the tongue reflects spiritual maturity and wisdom in the believer's walk.

A Club For Non-cursers

Mark 7:20

He has received more than 60,000 pieces of hate mail in the past seven weeks and profanity-laced e-mails daily fill his inbox. Teaming with the torrent of written abuse has been scores of threatening voice messages.

Given the quantity of the ridicule being heaped on this person, you might conclude that he is a serial killer or pedophile. So, just who is this vilified individual and what has he done to earn such scorn?

The person being subjected to the aforementioned abuse is McKay Hatch, a 15-year-old high school freshman in Pasadena, California. Hatch is being attacked because he had the audacity to begin a club dedicated to curtailing profanity at his school.

On the “No Cussing Club” website (www.nocussing.com), Hatch shares how the club got its start.

“I started the “No Cussing Club” at my junior high school...in 2007,” he writes. “A lot of kids at my school, and some of my friends, would cuss and use dirty language all the time. They did it so much, they didn’t even realize they were doing it.”

When Hatch told his friends that the cussing bothered him, he says “they were shocked.” As a result the group accepted a “No Cussing Challenge” whereby they made a “commitment to themselves to use better language.”

Hatch received approval for his club at his high school. On “club rush day,” 100 people joined. Soon after, the website went up and now the “No Cussing Club” boasts more than 20,000 members from all over the globe.

Hatch’s club is voluntary and has as its motto, “Leave people better than you found them.”

The “No Cussing Club” has also affected adults. At least two California municipalities have adopted a “no cussing week” designed to encourage the use of clean language.

I visited the “No Cussing Club” website and joined Hatch’s effort to encourage clean language. I agree with him that public discourse is too prolific with profanity.

Movies and television programs intended for general audiences once contained no cursing or sexual innuendo. Now you are hard-pressed to find mass media without crude content. As a result, cussing has trickled down and stained everyday discourse.

Language that was once uttered only by tough-talking men is now routinely heard at school, the mall, the public park and from the mouths of children.

While cussing has been around as long as there has been communication, until recently its frequent and public use has been frowned upon. Once, those who flaunted vulgar words and phrases were considered to be rude, crude or socially inept -- and sometimes all three.

“The foolish and wicked practice of profane cursing and swearing is a vice so mean and low,” said George Washington, “that every person of sense and character detests and despises it.” I am quite certain our first president would be disappointed at the proliferation of profanity that has occurred in the nation he helped found.

Some, it seems, have confused Hatch’s effort as an attack on their First Amendment right to use potty words in public. These folks’ ignorance of the U.S Constitution is surpassed only by their puny and uncreative vocabularies.

In order for freedom of speech to be in play, the government must be the agent attempting to censor communication -- like members of Congress wanting to resurrect the so-called Fairness Doctrine in an effort to muzzle conservative talk radio. A teenager starting a club to discourage cussing is not a freedom of speech issue. After all, membership in his club is voluntary.

So, why has Hatch been the target of so much vitriol? Why are so many proponents of profanity threatened by a voluntary club designed to promote the use of clean language? It seems like a bit of overreaction to me.

If you take a look at Hatch’s detractors through the lens of Scripture, you gain some perspective. “For the mouth speaks out of that which fills the heart,” the Bible says (Matthew 12:34). Scripture also states, “For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witnesses, slanders” (Matthew 15:19).

According to the Bible, speech -- as well as action -- is a matter of the heart. An undisciplined heart produces an unrestrained vocabulary as well as erratic behavior. Those attacking Hatch for his “No Cussing Club” overreact because their hearts -- like their vocabulary -- are out of control.

On rare occasion, and with much chagrin, even the most disciplined person might have an explicative escape his or her lips. However, the “No Cussing Club” is not about the infrequent slip of the tongue. McKay Hatch is calling attention to the unfettered and unrestrained use of profanity that degrades and sullies our culture. For that he deserves accolades, not attacks.

________

Kelly Boggs is a weekly columnist for Baptist Press and editor of the Baptist Message (www.baptistmessage.com), newsjournal of the Louisiana Baptist Convention.

Your 'Moronic 2 Minutes'

Galatians 5:22

Pastor, have you ever had a meltdown in the pulpit?

In the news recently, two Atlanta radio jocks were fired for the on-air mocking they did of a New Orleans icon, former Saints football player Steve Gleason who has ALS (Lou Gehrig’s) and lives in a wheelchair and speaks through a computer.

They made fun of him, parodied his situation, and someone role-played Steve speaking of his coming death and such. It was the ultimate in offensive.

In the article which ran here in New Orleans, one of the terminated idiots (I’m so objective in this story, as you can see) said, “What were we thinking?” The jocks apologized, and in a subsequent story, Gleason said he accepted their apology.

One of the men called it “a moronic two minutes.” No argument.

I have had a few moronic two minutes in my long lifetime, and expect some of our readers have also.

I know a pastor who was so exasperated with his small congregation that in a Sunday morning sermon, he berated them for their laziness and unresponsiveness and, working himself up into a lather, stalked out of the service, leaving his people sitting there.

The deacons -- I think the church had three -- went to him that afternoon to try to bring him to his senses.

Later that day, in the evening service, the pastor apologized to the church and kept on talking. Big mistake. The more he tried to explain why he did what he had done, he slipped into that same rant and once again, walked out of church, leaving the members stunned.

You will not be surprised to learn he was fired that week.

An uncontrolled display of the flesh by an undisciplined minister has aborted many a ministry.

Impulsive humor is often repulsive humor.

Impulsive anger has caused a zillion problems. (Just the other day, I heard of a man who owned racehorses growing exasperated because a prize stallion kept fading in the stretch and failing to win. In a burst of anger, the owner took a shotgun and killed the horse on the spot.)

Impulsive buying by a husband or wife has ruined many a marriage.

“But the fruit of the Spirit is ... self-control” (Galatians 5:22-23).

When Margaret and I were young marrieds, we moved 350 miles with our 1-year-old son to enroll in seminary. This was the first time Margaret had ever lived away from her hometown and I was trying to learn subjects like Hebrew and Greek while holding down a part-time job. The stress on our marriage was considerable.

On one occasion during one of our frequent arguments, I was so angry, I put my fist through the wall. Granted, it was only sheetrock and that’s not hard to do, but the sight of that -- and the humiliation of having to go to the campus housing office and report it so it could be repaired -- got my attention.

More and more, as I prayed about my temper, Galatians 5:22-23 kept returning to my mind. The solution to my anger, I realized, was not working on anger issues. It was to be filled with the Spirit and let Him bear His fruit through me.

As I grew in Christ, the temper -- and everything else -- came more and more under His control.

What to do after your moronic two minutes

I apologized to Margaret for the display of the flesh. She forgave me, then said, “I was goading you into it.” Her taking part of the responsibility helped me deal with it.

When any of us have such a meltdown, there is no substitute to the basic Christian steps all of God’s people are asked to do when they sin:

1) Repent.

2) Confess.

3) Apologize to our victims and the spectators.

4) Restore or repay, to the extent you can.

5) Learn from it.

6) Now, get up and try again. Do not park by your failures, do not grovel in your failings and do not camp out on your weaknesses. You can do all things through Christ who strengthens you, including overcoming this failing.

7) Put it behind you now and be proactive for the future. Anticipate moments and situations that could be stressful, and prepare. Pray!

You are not perfect and never will be in this life. But the Lord deserves servants who strive to please Him in all we do.

“Set a guard upon my mouth, O Lord. Keep watch over the door of my lips” (Psalm 141:3).

Uncontrolled and undisciplined anything is always unworthy of Christ-followers.

Presidential Name-Calling

Matthew 5:22

Many consider the presidential campaign of 2016 to be one of the worst in history. A key element has been all the name-calling. Hillary Clinton expressed regret for saying “half” of Donald Trump’s supporters are “deplorables.” That was her not-so-nice way of saying they are racist, sexist, homophobic and xenophobic (fear of foreigners).

Hillary is actually a pretty weak name-caller. Donald Trump is the master. He coined “Crazy Bernie,” “Lyin’ Ted,” “Low-Energy Jeb” and “Crooked Hillary.” These are not one-off insults but his regular names for them.

His running mate, Mike Pence, criticized President Obama for suggesting that Trump is a demagogue. Pence said that name-calling has no place in public life in America. He may have been saying it ironically, but Pence did make a vow years ago that he would not fuel his campaigns by making personal attacks on his opponents.

Pence backed off a little when he was confronted with Trump’s harsh names for opponents. Pence said, “You know, in NASCAR, they saying rubbing is racing. In a competitive primary, things can get a little tough sometimes.” [1]

American campaigns have always been tough. Donald and Hillary did not invent name-calling and they have not even been the worst at it. America has a rich tradition of mud-slinging.

The campaign of 1800 was the first competitive race for President. The earlier elections had chosen George Washington with unanimous votes by the Electoral College, something that has never happened since. Political parties had not been organized by 1800 so everyone ran as individuals. Interestingly, the winner became president and the second place person became vice president. Can you imagine President Hillary Clinton and Vice President Trump? Or President Trump and Vice President Clinton? Let the fireworks begin!

In 1800, John Adams ran against Thomas Jefferson, the former President running against his former Vice President. They didn’t actively campaign back then because it was considered too unseemly. They stayed home and hired hatchet men to do the dirty work.

Adam’s men called Jefferson “a mean-spirited, low-lived fellow, the son of a half-breed Indian squaw, sired by a Virginia mulatto father.” Jefferson’s men called Adams a “hideous hermaphroditical character, which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman.” To really get at someone, just call them “hermaphroditical.”

Even Martha Washington called Jefferson “one of the most detestable of mankind.” That is pretty close to “deplorables.” [2]

In the 1828 race, John Quincy Adams was called a pimp, and Andrew Jackson’s wife was called a slut.

Abraham Lincoln was called “Ignoramus Abe,” a buffoon, and a rail-splitter (an insult back then). [3]

Teddy Roosevelt came up with the terms “muckrakers” and “lunatic fringe.” [3]

Jesus warns of the danger of calling people names. In Matthew 5:22 he says that calling someone “raca” (Aramaic for empty-headed or stupid) could get you in trouble with the courts but calling them “fool” (an equally mild term) could get you thrown into hell. Yet Jesus himself called people names. In Matthew 23 he calls his opponents names 16 times. [4] But in each case he gave a reason why they deserved that name. He was never gratuitous. And of course as the Son of God he had perfect insight into the thoughts and intentions of his opponents. Since we do not, we would be wise to heed Matthew 5:22.

________

1. "Mike Pence: Politics is No Place for ‘Name Calling’," by Vaughn Hillyard, NBC News, 29 July 2016; .

2. "Founding Fathers' dirty campaign," by Kerwin Swint, Mental Floss, CNN.com, 22 August 2008; .

3. "12 Classic Political Insults," by Rose Marie Ostler, The Blog, 3 September 2011, updated 3 November 2011; .

4. "The Virtue of Name-Calling," by John W. Robbins, October 1979; .

from (see notes) · Rev. David Holwick via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database tonguewordscriticism

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate