Jeremiah 43

Jeremiah Chapter Forty-Three Verse 1 Jeremiah 43JUDAH MOVES TO EGYPT; TAKING AND BARUCHThis is a tragic chapter indeed. “Think of it! Abraham’s descendants returned to Egypt long after their liberation from it. With great suffering they had been delivered from their bondage in Egypt, only to return nearly nine hundred years later a defeated, hopeless remnant!"[1]There is probably nowhere to be found a better comment upon the incredible blindness of human politicians than the one afforded by this chapter. The chapter divisions are: (1) Judah’s leaders reject God’s word (Jeremiah 43:1-4); (2) Jeremiah and Baruch taken to Egypt (Jeremiah 43:5-7); (3) Prophecy of conquest of Egypt (Jeremiah 43:8-11); and (4) Prophecy against the gods of Egypt (Jeremiah 43:12-13). Jeremiah 43:1-4JUDAH’S LEADERS REJECT GOD’S WORD"And it came to pass that when Jeremiah had made an end to speaking unto all the people all the words of Jehovah their God, wherewith Jehovah their God had sent him unto them, even all these words, then spake Azariah the son of Hoshaiah, and Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the proud men, saying unto Jeremiah, Thou speakest falsely: Jehovah our God hath not sent thee to say, Ye shall not go into Egypt to sojourn there; but Baruch the son of Neriah setteth thee on against us, to deliver us into the hands of the Chaldeans, that they may put us to death, and carry us away captive to Babylon. So Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces, and all the people, obeyed not the voice of Jehovah, to dwell in the land of Judah.““And all the proud men …” (Jeremiah 43:2). The two prominent leaders, Azariah and Johanan, were backed up by a group of men, called here “the proud men.” The versions provide further insight into the meaning of these words: “the insolent men” (Revised Standard Version); “the arrogant men” (the Good News Bible). They were the bold and confident unbelievers who constituted the vast majority of that apostate generation of the Chosen People, having no regard whatever, either for Almighty God, or God’s prophets. We do not believe that there was anything whatever in the allegations of those Jewish leaders of either truth or probability. For example, their suggestion that Baruch was the author of Jeremiah’s prophecies here was an outright falsehood. What a preposterous proposition it was that, “The prophet who would not trim his message for the king himself would have allowed himself to be manipulated by his secretary!"[2]“All the people obeyed not …” (Jeremiah 43:4) The insolent, loud-mouthed, arrogant, and confident claims of the false leaders quickly swept away all objections to their policies; and they proceeded at once to Egypt. Jeremiah did not defend himself against the charge of prophesying a falsehood, but trusted in the future to reveal who was true and who was false. Verse 5 THE RETURN OF JUDAH TO EGYPT"But Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces, took all the remnant of Judah, that were returned from all the nations whither they had been driven, to sojourn in the land of Judah; the men, and the women, and the children, and the king’s daughters, and every person that Nebuzaradan the captain of the guard had left with Gedaliah the son of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan; and Jeremiah the prophet, and Baruch the son of Neriah. And they came into the land of Egypt; for they obeyed not the voice of Jehovah: and they came unto Tahpanhes.““Johanan… took all the remnant … and Jeremiah… and Baruch… and came into the land of Egypt …”(Jeremiah 43:5-7). From this, it is certain that both Jeremiah and his amanuensis Baruch were unwilling participants in this migration back to Egypt. Tragic as this pitiful maneuver actually was, “It resulted in the fulfillment of Jeremiah’s prophecy that Jerusalem would be uninhabited (Jeremiah 24:8-10). This migration to Egypt accomplished the utter de-population of the land; and the sole hope of the nation was then (and afterward) centered in the Babylonian exiles."[3] In the light of the unbelieving arrogance and conceit of that whole generation of apostates, there was nothing whatever that God could have done with them, unless it had been preceded by the sincere repentance and reformation of the people, that being, according to all indications, an utterly impossible thing to have anticipated. “Tahpanhes …” (Jeremiah 43:7). This was an important fortified city on the eastern Delta of the Nile, where Pharaoh had a summer home and some kind of an administrative center. It seems to be the same place which Herodotus called Daphnai, now thought to be the modern Tell-Defenneh, some 27 miles south-southwest of Port Said.[4]The immigrants probably stopped here in order to procure permission of Pharaoh to enter Egypt, and to explore possible ways of making a living. Verse 8 THE OF EGYPT"Then came the word of Jehovah unto Jeremiah in Tahpanhes, saying, Take great stones in thy hand, and hide them in mortar in the brickwork, which is at the entry of Pharaoh’s house in Tahpanhes, in the sight of the sons of Judah; and say unto them, Thus saith Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel: Behold, I will send and take Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, my servant, and will set his throne upon these stones that I have hid; and he shall spread his royal pavilion over them. And he shall come and smite the land of Egypt; such as are for death, shall be given to death, such as are for captivity to captivity, and such as for the sword to the sword.“We reject such irresponsible comment on this paragraph as that of Thompson who stated that, “Jeremiah’s prophecy was not fulfilled literally."[5] On the contrary, both the Babylonian historian Berossus “confirms the conquest of Egypt by Nebuchadnezzar”;[6] and the Jewish historian Josephus flatly declared that, “Nebuchadnezzar fell upon Egypt to subdue it; and he slew the king that then reigned and set up another. He also took those Jews that were there captives, and led them away to Babylon."[7] In the light of both Babylonian and Jewish historians agreeing that such a conquest did indeed occur, we consider the historical evidence heavily weighted in favor of the exact and circumstantial fulfillment of Jeremiah’s prophecy here. Yes, we are aware that there is a fad among current scholars who accept only the writings of Josephus which they think can be used to support their critical theories, rejecting all others; but we have no confidence in such rejections of the only known historian of that era among the Jews. Herodotus contradicted some of the things that Josephus wrote; but the reverse is also true. Josephus contradicted some of the things Herodotus wrote. The ability to decide who was correct in a given matter is simply not to be found in any man living thousands of years after the events. There is also some fragmentary archaeological evidence that Nebuchadnezzar indeed invaded Egypt. “Three of Nebuchadnezzar’s inscriptions have been found near Tahpanhes."[8] “An ancient inscription confirms the fact that Nebuchadnezzar invaded Egypt in 568 B.C, when Amasis was Pharaoh."[9]It should always be remembered in the case of deciding whether or not prophecies were fulfilled by historical events, that the fragmentary information which has drifted down through history concerning those ancient times is totally inadequate to justify the extravagant assertions of some critics denying that certain prophecies were fulfilled. As Green noted, “The paucity of knowledge concerning the period is such that it is impossible to know what happened."[10] In addition to that impediment, there is in this very chapter the question of exactly what is meant by the sacred text. For example, the word translated “obelisks” inJeremiah 43:12, “pillars” in some translations, etc., actually means “images” and is so used in Isaiah. Regarding this matter, we appreciate the words of Cheyne who stated that “some have wrongfully controverted”[11] the proposition that Jeremiah’s prophecies were actually literally fulfilled. Verse 12 AGAINST THE GODS OF EGYPT"And I will kindle a fire in the houses of the gods of Egypt; and he shall burn them, and carry them away captive: and shall array himself with the land of Egypt, as a shepherd putteth on his garment; and shall go forth from thence in peace. He shall also break the pillars of Bethshemesh, that is in the land of Egypt; and the houses of the gods of Egypt shall he burn with fire.““As a shepherd putteth on his garment …” (Jeremiah 43:12). Keil gave special attention to the words thus rendered and gave as his opinion that they are properly translated thus: “As easily as any shepherd in the open field wraps himself in his cloak,” adding that, “Other explanations of the word are far-fetched and lexically untenable."[12]We would like to call attention to the preposterous mistranslation of this passage in the Good News Bible. “As a shepherd picks his clothes clean of lice, so the king of Babylon will pick the land of Egypt clean.” Such words are simply not in the text. James Moffatt’s Translation of the Bible (1929) didn’t do any better: “He shall scour the land of Egypt as a shepherd picks vermin out of his plaid.” “Bethshemesh …” (Jeremiah 43:13). The Revised Standard Version renders this place Heliopolis on the probability that they might be the same. If that identity is correct, the Egyptian temple of the Sun God was located there.

Jeremiah 43:1

Jeremiah 43:1. When Jeremiah spoke all the words of the Lord he fulfilled the promise he made to these people as recorded in Jeremiah 42:1.

Jeremiah 43:2

Jeremiah 43:2. We regret to see the change that seemed to come over Johanan. In the previous chapters he was devoted to the interests of Jeremiah and the other refugees and opposed the wicked plots of Ishmael. Now he is against Jeremiah and siding with the others who rebelled against the admonition of the Lord. He even accused Jeremiah of falsehood and denied his inspiration. These men were said to be proud, which shows that pride is not always exhibited by some showy condition. In the present case it was demonstrated by a rebellious spirit. Paul gives a similar picture of it in 1 Timothy 6:3-4 where he accuses a false teacher of being proud.

Jeremiah 43:3

Jeremiah 43:3. Baruch was Jeremiah’ s secretary (Jeremiah 32:12-14) and was a good man. There was no ground for saying that he had influenced Jeremiah in the wrong direction. But some pretext had to he used for opposing the prophet since he had previously supported him in his teaching. If a good man could be Influenced at all in tbe wrong direction, it would probably be possible to be done by the words of a friend; hence the mention of Baruch who was a trusted servant of Jeremiah.

Jeremiah 43:4

Jeremiah 43:4. Some people do not appreciate a good thing when they have It. These captives of Babylon had been given the privilege of remaining in their own home land, but now they ignored that favor and planned to flee out of the country. Such an action was as bad in principle as that of a “trusty” who abuses his parole by fleeing.

Jeremiah 43:5

Jeremiah 43:5. This revolt was headed by Johanan and included the scattered citizens of Judah from various territories.

Jeremiah 43:6

Jeremiah 43:6. All of these persons were herded into a band of escapees to be taken to Egypt. We have no direct information as to the attitude of these individuals, but we do know that Jeremiah and hss faithful secretary Baruch were not willing to go. Hence we may justly say that they were kidnaped by Johanan.

Jeremiah 43:7

Jeremiah 43:7. This verse concludes the sad story of this rebellious action. The significant part of the whole affair was in the fact that it was in disobedience against the word of the Lord. Tahpanhes was the place where they settled which is in the northeast part of Egypt,

Jeremiah 43:8

Jeremiah 43:8. In ancient times the Lord frequently used one heathen nation to chastise another. This verse starts a bracket in which the prophet predicts a conflict between Egypt and Babylon and the victory will be on the side of Babylon. Following my practice where important information can be gained from secular history, I shall here make a quotation as follows: “The king of Babylon, taking advantage therefore of the intestine divisions which the rebellion of Amasis had occasioned in that kingdom, marched thither at the head of his army. He subdued Egypt from Migdol or Magdol, a town on the frontiers [borders] of the kingdom, as far as Syene, in the opposite extremity where it borders on Ethiopia. He made a horrible devastation wher-ever he came; killed a great number of the inhabitants, and made such dreadful havoc in the country, that the damage could not be repaired in forty years.

Nebuchadnezzar, having loaded his army with spoils, and conquered the whole kingdom, came to an accommodation [agreement] with Amasis; and leaving him as his viceroy [representative] there, returned to Babylon [emphasis mine, E. M. Z.J.” Rollin’ s Ancient History, Volume 1, page 232. This history is corroborated in Britan- nica, v. 7, p. 743, article Egypt; Josephus, Antiquities, Book 10, Chapter 10, Section 3.

Jeremiah 43:9

Jeremiah 43:9. It is related that Pharaoh was repairing his palace at the time of this prediction. The stones referred to were like those being used for the repair work of the self-satisfied Egyptian king.

Jeremiah 43:10

Jeremiah 43:10, The significance of the “acting” was just where the king of Egypt was feeling secure in his power, the king of Babylon would some day set np his throne. My servant Is said of Nebuchadnezzar because the Lord was going to use his services in punishing the king of Egypt.

Jeremiah 43:11

Jeremiah 43:11. Famine, pestilence and sword were often threatened as a punishment from God in ancient times. That is practically what is meant in this verse. When an attack was made some might surrender without putting up any fight; they would be punished with captivity. Others would resist but would be finally slain by the sword. Still others would neither try to fight nor be submissive to capture willingly. All such would be hemmed in by a siege and finally meet death from the pestilence that usually resulted from a famine caused by a siege.

Jeremiah 43:12

Jeremiah 43:12. The Egyptians, like Babylonians, were worshipers of false gods and had houses erected for their services. These houses were destined to be set on fire by the Babylonians who are the antecedent of the pronoun belt is a very easy thing for a shepherd to put on his garment when he wishes to go out about his business in control of his flock. The fact is used figuratively to illustrate the success of the king of Babylon in appropriating to himself the spoils of Egypt.

Jeremiah 43:13

Jeremiah 43:13, A general prediction was made against the gods of Egypt in the preceding verse. This specifies a place called Beth-shemesh which was con-sidered as a holy city by the Egyptians because of the houses therein erected to the gods.