Joel 1:4 — Word Study
WLCיֶ֤תֶר הַגָּזָם֙ אָכַ֣ל הָֽאַרְבֶּ֔ה וְיֶ֥תֶר הָאַרְבֶּ֖ה אָכַ֣ל הַיָּ֑לֶק וְיֶ֣תֶר הַיֶּ֔לֶק אָכַ֖ל הֶחָסִֽיל׃
BSAWhat the devouring locustgâzâm [cutting, palmer-worm] has leftyether the swarming locustʼarbeh [great] has eatenʼâkal■ what the swarming locustʼarbeh has leftyether the young locustyeleq [hopping, canker-worm] has eatenʼâkal■ and what the young locustyeleq has leftyether the destroying locustchâçîyl [caterpillar, ravaging] has eatenʼâkal■
| Greek | English | Parsing |
|---|---|---|
| יֶ֤תֶר | [the] remainder of | Noun common, masculine singular construct |
| הַגָּזָם֙ | the locust[s] | Particle, noun common masculine singular absolute |
| אָכַ֣ל | it has eaten | Verb, Qal, perfect third person masculine singular |
| הָֽאַרְבֶּ֔ה | the locust[s] | Particle, noun common masculine singular absolute |
| וְיֶ֥תֶר | and [the] remainder of | Conjunction, noun common masculine singular construct |
| הָאַרְבֶּ֖ה | the locust[s] | Particle, noun common masculine singular absolute |
| אָכַ֣ל | it has eaten | Verb, Qal, perfect third person masculine singular |
| הַיָּ֑לֶק | the locust[s] | Particle, noun common masculine singular absolute |
| וְיֶ֣תֶר | and [the] remainder of | Conjunction, noun common masculine singular construct |
| הַיֶּ֔לֶק | the locust[s] | Particle, noun common masculine singular absolute |
| אָכַ֖ל | it has eaten | Verb, Qal, perfect third person masculine singular |
| הֶחָסִֽיל׃ | the locust[s] | Particle, noun common masculine singular absolute |
Every word in the verse. Click a row to open it in the panel on the left.
| BSB | What the devouring locust has left, the swarming locust has eaten; what the swarming locust has left, the young locust has eaten; and what the young locust has left, the destroying locust has eaten. |
| KJV | That which the palmerworm hath left hath the locust eaten; and that which the locust hath left hath the cankerworm eaten; and that which the cankerworm hath left hath the caterpiller eaten. |
| ASV | That which the palmer-worm hath left hath the locust eaten; and that which the locust hath left hath the canker-worm eaten; and that which the canker-worm hath left hath the caterpillar eaten. |
| YLT | What is left of the palmer-worm, eaten hath the locust, And what is left of the locust, Eaten hath the cankerworm, And what is left of the cankerworm, Eaten hath the caterpillar. |
| WEB | What the swarming locust has left, the great locust has eaten. What the great locust has left, the grasshopper has eaten. What the grasshopper has left, the caterpillar has eaten. |
| BBE | What the worm did not make a meal of, has been taken by the locust; and what the locust did not take, has been food for the plant-worm; and what the plant-worm did not take, has been food for the field-fly. |
Where they part company is in the rendering of the locust types, with some versions providing additional descriptors such as 'cutting' or 'hopping', while others simply use 'locust'.
The sentence is structured around a series of clauses that describe the ongoing cycle of consumption by different locust types.
8 commentators on this verse
Gill, Jamieson, Poole, Trapp & more — read them ›
clause
verbאָכַל
The sentence as the grammar sees it Open the tree ›
Every word here is used elsewhere in the Old Testament.
Bars are logarithmic — אֵת, the commonest word in the Hebrew Bible, stands about 11,000 times, so a linear scale would leave everything else invisible. Click a row to open that word.
Deep Study — Joel 1:4
Sections marked generated are written from the data on this page rather than by a named author. Everything else — the lexicon entries, the cross references, the manuscript readings, the counts — is quoted from its source unchanged.
Context — The Devastation of Locustsgenerated
Joel 1:4 describes the catastrophic impact of locusts on the land, emphasizing how each type of locust consumes what the previous one has left. This imagery highlights the severity of the destruction and serves as a metaphor for judgment upon the people. The context of this verse is a call to recognize the dire situation and respond appropriately, as seen in the surrounding verses that call for mourning and repentance.
Cross References
| Reference | Text (BSB) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joel 2:25 | I will repay you for the years eaten by locusts— the swarming locust, the young locust, the destroying locust, and the devouring locust — My great army that I sent against you. |
| 2 | Amos 4:9 | “I struck you with blight and mildew in your growing gardens and vineyards; the locust devoured your fig and olive trees, yet you did not return to Me,” declares the LORD. |
| 3 | Exodus 10:4 | But if you refuse to let My people go, I will bring locusts into your territory tomorrow. |
| 4 | Exodus 10:12–15 | Then the LORD said to Moses, “Stretch out your hand over the land of Egypt, so that the locusts may swarm over it and devour every plant in the land—everything that the hail has left behind.” |
| 5 | Deuteronomy 28:38–42 | You will sow much seed in the field but harvest little, because the locusts will consume it. |
The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge — 15 references, hung on the phrase they belong to
The Key Word — יֶ֫תֶר, Ye.tergenerated
The Hebrew word יֶ֫תֶר (*yether*) means 'the remainder of' and is often used to describe what is left over after something has been consumed or used. It is derived from a root meaning 'to remain' and can refer to both a surplus or remnant. In this verse, it indicates what the locusts have not yet eaten, emphasizing the totality of the devastation.
The parsing as a masculine singular construct noun shows that it functions as a part of a larger phrase, linking it to the locusts and their destructive actions. This word underscores the relentless cycle of consumption by the locusts, as each type leaves behind little for the next.
How Translations Differ — measured against the Berean Standard Biblegenerated
Translations of this verse generally agree on the meaning, consistently rendering יֶ֫תֶר as 'the remainder' or 'what is left'.
Sentence Structuregenerated
The finite verb אָכַל, it has eaten, governs the entire verse, with multiple phrases describing what has been consumed. The structure emphasizes the sequential nature of the destruction, as each locust type consumes what the previous one has left.
The repetition of the structure 'what the [locust type] has left, the [next locust type] has eaten' creates a rhythmic pattern that reinforces the ongoing devastation.
Septuagint Backgroundgenerated
The Septuagint uses the Greek word κάμπης to translate גָּזָם, indicating a specific type of locust. This choice reflects a focus on the destructive nature of the locusts, similar to the Hebrew.
The use of different terms for the locusts in the Septuagint may suggest a broader interpretation of the types of locusts and their impact, showing the translators' intent to convey the severity of the destruction.
In plain words — the whole versegenerated
Joel 1:4 describes how different types of locusts consume everything in their path, leaving nothing behind. This verse illustrates the complete destruction that locusts bring to the land, emphasizing the need for the people to recognize the severity of their situation.
Frequently Asked Questionsgenerated
It refers to what is left after the locusts have eaten, highlighting the total consumption of resources.
Each type represents a stage in the cycle of destruction, showing how devastation continues without pause.
Locusts symbolize judgment and destruction, serving as a warning to the people of Israel.
It fits into a larger theme of repentance and recognition of God's judgment, as seen in the calls to mourning in the surrounding verses.
Reflection Questionsgenerated
- How can I recognize the areas in my life that may be facing destruction or neglect?
- What steps can I take to address the consequences of my actions before they lead to greater loss?
- In what ways can I help others understand the seriousness of their situation, as Joel did?
- How does this imagery of locusts challenge my understanding of God's judgment?
The early church on this verse — how the Fathers read it
Early commentators reference this verse to discuss the symbolic meanings of the locusts and the impending judgment, providing insights into its interpretation.
The twelve prophets whose writings are compressed within the narrow limits of a single volume have symbolic, typical meanings far beyond their literal ones.Early Church Fathers on Joel 1 →
The residue of a caterpillar is eaten by a locust, and the residue of a locust is eaten by a beetle, and the residue of the beetle is eaten by rust. In the same way seventy times.Early Church Fathers on Joel 1 →
In a figurative manner he wants to convey to them the impending troubles; as always, the earlier ones are surpassed by those coming later.Early Church Fathers on Joel 1 →
Commentators on this verse — 8 expositors, verse by verse
Each of these wrote on Joel 1:4 itself, not merely on the chapter around it.
John Gill1697–1771Gill's Exposition of the Entire BibleThat which the palmer worm hath left hath the locust eaten,.... These, with the two following, are four kinds of, locusts as Jarchi observes; though it is difficult to fix the particular species
Read John Gill on Joel 1 →Robert Jamieson1802–1880Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown's CommentaryThat which the palmerworm hath left hath the locust eaten; and that which the locust hath left hath the cankerworm eaten; and that which the cankerworm hath left hath the caterpiller eaten.
Read Robert Jamieson on Joel 1 →Matthew Poole1624–1679Matthew Poole's Commentary on the Holy BibleFour sorts of insects pernicious to all sorts of trees, corn, and herbs are here mentioned, which did succeed each other, and devoured all that might be a future support to the Jews; whence ensued a grievous famine for four years together, say the Jewish interpreters, though there is no cogent reason in what they mention for proof hereof. These insects might in the same year succeed each other, the one, as is usual, might come sooner, the rest successively, each in its season, and so spoil the springing of all things, which they did (I do believe) really; and though these might be emblems of some future devastation, yet it seems most agreeable to reason, and the context, that there should…
Read Matthew Poole on Joel 1 →John Trapp1601–1669Trapp's Complete Commentary on the Old and New TestamentsJoe 1:4 That which the palmerworm hath left hath the locust eaten; and that which the locust hath left hath the cankerworm eaten; and that which the cankerworm hath left hath the caterpiller eaten.Ver. 4. That which the palmerworm hath left hath the locust eaten] The palmerworm hath its name in Hebrew from shaving, βζν (because it shaveth off the fruits of the earth). In Chaldee from creeping; in Greek from crookening; in Latin from gnawing. (Zachala. καμπη. Eruca ab erodendo.) The locust hath its name in Hebrew from multitude, wherewith the very sun is darkened; in Latin from burning places, where it spoileth, Locusts, quasi loca ustulans; in Greek from cropping the tops of grain and…
Read John Trapp on Joel 1 →Charles John Ellicott1819–1905Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers(4) That which the palmerworm hath left.—The picture is introduced suddenly and graphically. “Behold the desolation!” “Note the cause.” The earth is bared by locusts beyond all previous experience. There were different sorts of locusts; as many as ninety have been reckoned. The four names, palmerworm, locust, cankerworm, caterpiller, indicate different swarms of the insect. The first—Gazam—points to its voracity; the second—Arbeh—its multitude; the third—Yelek—its manner of “licking up” the grass like cattle; the fourth—Chasil—its destructive effect. The number enumerated, four, draws attention to the “four sore judgments” with which Ezekiel was instructed to threaten Jerusalem, and to the…
Read Charles John Ellicott on Joel 1 →AdamClarkeAdam Clarke's Commentary on the BibleVerse 4. That which the palmerworm hath left] Here he begins to open his message, and the words he chooses show that he is going to announce a devastation of the land by locusts, and a famine consequent on their depredations. What the different insects may be which he specifies is not easy to determine. I shall give the words of the original, with their etymology. The palmerworm, גזם gazam, from the same root, to cut short; probably the caterpillar, or some such blight, from its cutting the leaves of the trees into pieces for its nourishment. The locust, ארבה arbeh, from רבה rabah, to multiply, from the immense increase and multitude of this insect. Cankerworm, ילק yelek, from לק lak, to…
Read AdamClarke on Joel 1 →CambridgeThe Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges4. The calamity to which the prophet has thus emphatically directed his hearers’ attention: a visitation of locusts, repeated for more years than one (Joe 2:25), and of unexampled severity; what had escaped the ravages of one swarm, had been speedily devoured by a succeeding one, till the crops were completely ruined, and every chance both of harvest and vintage had been utterly destroyed. That which the shearer (gβzβm) hath left, the swarmer (arbeh) hath eaten;And that which the swarmer (arbeh) hath left, the lapper (yιleḳ ?) hath eaten;And that which the lapper (yιleḳ ?) hath left, the finisher (ḥ ?βsξl) hath eaten. The general intention of the verse is manifestly to describe a total…
Read Cambridge on Joel 1 →Albert Barnes1798–1870Barnes' Notes on the BibleThat which the palmerworm hath left, hath the locust eaten - The creatures here spoken of are different kinds of locusts, so named from their number or voracity.
Read Albert Barnes on Joel 1 →The verse in English, compared — 17 translations, and where they part company
Every translation on this page is a decision someone had to make and commit to. Read down a column and you see one translator's judgement; read across a row and you see the range the Greek actually allows. The BSB is the wording the rest of this page is measured against, so it is listed first.
Modern formal
What the devouring locust has left, the swarming locust has eaten; what the swarming locust has left, the young locust has eaten; and what the young locust has left, the destroying locust has eaten.
What the swarming locust has left, the great locust has eaten. What the great locust has left, the grasshopper has eaten. What the grasshopper has left, the caterpillar has eaten.
What the devouring locust has left, the swarming locust has eaten; what the swarming locust has left, the young locust has eaten; and what the young locust has left, the destroying locust has eaten.
What the gazam-locust left the ‘arbeh-locust consumed, what the ‘arbeh-locust left the yeleq-locust consumed, and what the yeleq-locust left the hasil-locust consumed!
Tyndale line
That which the palmerworm hath left hath the locust eaten; and that which the locust hath left hath the cankerworm eaten; and that which the cankerworm hath left hath the caterpiller eaten.
That which the palmer-worm hath left hath the locust eaten; and that which the locust hath left hath the canker-worm eaten; and that which the canker-worm hath left hath the caterpillar eaten.
That which the palmerworm hath left hath the locust eaten; and that which the locust hath left hath the cankerworm eaten; and that which the cankerworm hath left hath the caterpiller eaten.
That which the palmer-worm hath left hath the locust eaten; and that which the locust hath left hath the canker-worm eaten; and that which the canker-worm hath left hath the caterpillar eaten.
That which is left of ye palmer worme, hath the grashopper eaten, and the residue of ye grashopper hath the canker worme eaten, and the residue of the canker worme hath the caterpiller eaten.
Strictly literal
that which the palmer-worm hath left hath the locust eaten; and that which the locust hath left hath the cankerworm eaten; and that which the cankerworm hath left hath the caterpillar eaten.
What is left of the palmer-worm, eaten hath the locust, And what is left of the locust, Eaten hath the cankerworm, And what is left of the cankerworm, Eaten hath the caterpillar.
What is left of the palmer-worm, the locust has eaten, || And what is left of the locust, || The cankerworm has eaten, || And what is left of the cankerworm, || The caterpillar has eaten.
What the caterpillar left hath the locust eaten; and what the locust left hath the cankerworm eaten; and that which the cankerworm left hath the cricket eaten.
What the swarming locust has left the great locust has eaten; what the great locust has left the grasshopper has eaten; and what the grasshopper has left the caterpillar has eaten.
From the Latin
That which the palmerworm hath left, the locust hath eaten: and that which the locust hath left, the bruchus hath eaten: and that which the bruchus hath left, the mildew hath destroyed.
Simplified
What the cutting locusts left, the swarming locusts have eaten; what the swarming locusts left, the hopping locusts have eaten; what the hopping locusts left, the destroying locusts have eaten.
What the worm did not make a meal of, has been taken by the locust; and what the locust did not take, has been food for the plant-worm; and what the plant-worm did not take, has been food for the field-fly.
Counted from the translations carried on this site, not from a survey of every English Bible. A rendering shared by many versions is usually inherited rather than independently arrived at — the Tyndale line in particular runs through most of them.
The sentence as the grammar sees it — from the MACULA Hebrew treebank
This is not our own analysis: it is the scholarly syntax tree for the verse, showing how the clause actually holds together.
Boxes are the grammarian's groupings — clause, noun phrase, prepositional phrase.
The four witnesses to this verse — Masoretic, Septuagint, Samaritan, Qumran
The Masoretic Text and the Septuagint largely agree in their wording, with only minor differences in translation and word order. The Septuagint aligns closely with the Hebrew, maintaining the core message of devastation.
יֶ֤תֶר הַגָּזָם֙ אָכַ֣ל הָֽאַרְבֶּ֔ה וְיֶ֥תֶר הָאַרְבֶּ֖ה אָכַ֣ל הַיָּ֑לֶק וְיֶ֣תֶר הַיֶּ֔לֶק אָכַ֖ל הֶחָסִֽיל׃
11 of the 12 words are matched. This is the word-by-word correspondence, not the Septuagint's own sentence — its word order and its articles are its own.
Four traditions, not one. “On the leather” means the letters physically survive on the scroll, as against letters an editor has supplied to fill a hole in it — a restoration is a scholar’s reading, not a reading of the manuscript. Words in [square brackets] are supplied; the notes count them apart from what survives.
The map of this verse — what each word keeps company with
This is a map of two things, both counted rather than judged. Company kept: which words stand within three words of each of these, anywhere in the Hebrew Bible — the thicker the line, the more often the pair meet compared with chance. Built from: the words a word is made out of, taken from its own Strong’s entry. It is not a map of meaning: nothing here claims two words mean the same thing. Click any circle to see the numbers behind it.
Lexicons — every word in Joel 1:4
One dossier per word, with every reference work grouped by kind — Hebrew lexicons, morphology, Bible dictionaries, topical chains and the English of the translators themselves. The verse sits at the head of each block with the word under study lit, so you never lose your place. The panel above gives the short answer; this is the long one, and it is the part of the page worth indexing.
Every entry below is the lexicographer's own text. On the Hebrew: Brown-Driver-Briggs entire and its gloss set, Strong's Hebrew Dictionary, and Tyndale House's Translators Brief lexicon. Where a cell says a work has no entry, that work genuinely has none for this word.
The Hebrew word יֶ֫תֶר (*yether*) encompasses meanings related to remainder, excess, and excellence, as well as a small cord. It is derived from a root meaning 'to remain' and can refer to both a surplus or remnant and a physical string. The entries consistently highlight its dual meanings without significant disagreement.
יֶ֫תֶר 94 n.m. remainder, excellence, excess
base
יֶ֫תֶר n.m. cord (prop. as hanging over or down)
base
H3499a יֶ֫תֶר remainder, excellence, excess H3499b יֶ֫תֶר cord
3499 yether yeh'-ther
from 3498; properly, an overhanging, i.e. (by implication) an
excess, superiority, remainder; also a small rope (as hanging
free):--+ abundant, cord, exceeding, excellancy(-ent), what
they leave, that hath left, plentifully, remnant, residue,
rest, string, with.
see HEBREW for 03498
יֶ֫תֶר (ye.ter) — remainder.
1) remainder, excess, rest, remnant, excellence
1a) remainder, remnant
1b) remainder, rest, other part
1c) excess
1d) abundantly (adv)
1e) abundance, affluence
1f) superiority, excellency
יֶ֫תֶר (ye.ter) — cord.
cord
N-ms — Noun common · masculine singular constructHNcmsc
ov:
(1) In Anglo-Saxon, had the meaning "from," "away from" (as the strengthened form "off" has still), and was not used for genitive or possessive relations, these being expressed by special case-forms. In the Norman period, however, "of" was taken to represent the French de (a use well developed by the time of Chaucer), and in the Elizabethan period both senses of "of" were in common use. But after about 1600 the later force of the word became predominant, and in the earlier sense (which is now practically obsolete) it was replaced by other prepositions. In consequence the King James Version (and in some cases the Revised Version (British and American)) contains many uses of "of" that are no longer familiar--most of them, to be sure, causing no difficulty, but there still being a few responsible for real obscurities.
OF, preposition ov. [Gr.]
1. From or out of; proceeding from, as the cause, source, means, author or agent bestowing.
I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered to you. 1 Corinthians 11:1.
For it was of the Lord to harden their hearts. Joshua 11:1.
It is of the Lord's mercies that we are not consumed.
Lamentations 3:1.
The whole disposing thereof is of the Lord. Proverbs 16:1.
Go, inquire of the Lord for me. 2 Chronicles 34:2.
That holy thing that shall be born of thee. Luke 1:1.
Hence of is the sign of the genitive case, the case that denotes production; as the son of man, the son proceeding from man, produced from man. This is the primary sense, although we now say, produced by man. 'Part of these were slain; ' that is, a number separate, for part denotes a division; the sense then is, a number from or out of the whole were slain. So also, 'some of these were slain; ' that is…
גָּזָם (gazam) refers to locusts, specifically a type of locust known as the palmer-worm. The word is derived from an unused root meaning to devour, highlighting the destructive nature of these insects. It is noted in the Brown-Driver-Briggs lexicon as a collective noun for locusts.
גָּזָם n.m. locusts (coll.)
base
H1501 גָּזָם
1501 gazam gaw-zawm'
from an unused root meaning to devour; a kind of
locust:--palmer-worm.
גָּזָם (ga.zam) — locust.
locusts
Art | N-ms — Particle · noun common masculine singular absoluteHTd/Ncmsa
אָכַל (akal) means 'to eat' and encompasses a wide range of meanings, including literal consumption by humans and animals, as well as figurative uses like devouring by fire or destruction. It can describe actions such as feeding or causing to eat, and it also appears in contexts of oppression and destruction. The verb has various forms, indicating different subjects and nuances.
אָכַל 806 vb. eat
Qal
eat, human subject
of beasts, birds, etc., eat, devour
fig. of fire, devour, consume
of sword, devour, slay
in genl., devour, consume, destroy
fig. of oppression, devour the poor
Niph.
be eaten by man
be devoured by fire, consumed
be wasted, destroyed, of flesh
Pu. be consumed
Hiph.
cause to eat, feed with
cause to devoure, obj. sword
base
H398 אָכַל eat .. eat, human subject
. of beasts, birds, etc., eat, devour
. fig. of fire, devour, consume
. of sword, devour, slay
. in genl., devour, consume, destroy
. fig. of oppression, devour the poor
. . be eaten by man
. be devoured by fire, consumed
. be wasted, destroyed, of flesh
. be consumed
. . cause to eat, feed with
. cause to devoure, obj. sword
398 'akal aw-kal'
a primitive root; to eat (literally or figuratively):--X at
all, burn up, consume, devour(-er, up), dine, eat(-er, up),
feed (with), food, X freely, X in...wise(-deed, plenty), (lay)
meat, X quite.
אָכַל (a.khal) — to eat.
1) to eat, devour, burn up, feed
1a) (Qal)
1a1) to eat (human subject)
1a2) to eat, devour (of beasts and birds)
1a3) to devour, consume (of fire)
1a4) to devour, slay (of sword)
1a5) to devour, consume, destroy (inanimate subjects - ie, pestilence, drought)
1a6) to devour (of oppression)
1b) (Niphal)
1b1) to be eaten (by men)
1b2) to be devoured, consumed (of fire)
1b3) to be wasted, destroyed (of flesh)
1c) (Pual)
1c1) to cause to eat, feed with
1c2) to cause to devour
1d) (Hiphil)
1d1) to feed
1d2) to cause to eat
1e) (Piel)
1e1) consume
Aramaic equivalent: a.khal (אֲכַל "to devour" H0399)
V-Qal-Perf-3ms — Verb · Qal · perfect third person masculine singularHVqp3ms
אַרְבֶּה (arbeh) refers to a kind of locust, specifically noted for its rapid increase. The term can also imply a locust swarm and has figurative meanings related to sudden disappearance, insignificance, and activity. It is derived from a root meaning to increase, as noted in Strong's entries.
אַרְבֶּה a kind of locust
base
H697 אַרְבֶּה a kind of locust
697 'arbeh ar-beh'
from 7235; a locust (from its rapid increase):--
grasshopper, locust.
see HEBREW for 07235
אַרְבֶּה (ar.beh) — locust.
1) a kind of locust, locust swarm (coll)
2) (CLBL)
2a) sudden disappearance (fig.)
2b) insignificance (fig.)
2c) activity (fig.)
Art | N-ms — Particle · noun common masculine singular absoluteHTd/Ncmsa
The Hebrew word יֶ֫תֶר (*yether*) encompasses meanings related to remainder, excess, and excellence, as well as a small cord. It is derived from a root meaning 'to remain' and can refer to both a surplus or remnant and a physical string. The entries consistently highlight its dual meanings without significant disagreement.
יֶ֫תֶר 94 n.m. remainder, excellence, excess
base
יֶ֫תֶר n.m. cord (prop. as hanging over or down)
base
H3499a יֶ֫תֶר remainder, excellence, excess H3499b יֶ֫תֶר cord
3499 yether yeh'-ther
from 3498; properly, an overhanging, i.e. (by implication) an
excess, superiority, remainder; also a small rope (as hanging
free):--+ abundant, cord, exceeding, excellancy(-ent), what
they leave, that hath left, plentifully, remnant, residue,
rest, string, with.
see HEBREW for 03498
יֶ֫תֶר (ye.ter) — remainder.
1) remainder, excess, rest, remnant, excellence
1a) remainder, remnant
1b) remainder, rest, other part
1c) excess
1d) abundantly (adv)
1e) abundance, affluence
1f) superiority, excellency
יֶ֫תֶר (ye.ter) — cord.
cord
Conj | N-ms — Conjunction · noun common masculine singular constructHC/Ncmsc
ov:
(1) In Anglo-Saxon, had the meaning "from," "away from" (as the strengthened form "off" has still), and was not used for genitive or possessive relations, these being expressed by special case-forms. In the Norman period, however, "of" was taken to represent the French de (a use well developed by the time of Chaucer), and in the Elizabethan period both senses of "of" were in common use. But after about 1600 the later force of the word became predominant, and in the earlier sense (which is now practically obsolete) it was replaced by other prepositions. In consequence the King James Version (and in some cases the Revised Version (British and American)) contains many uses of "of" that are no longer familiar--most of them, to be sure, causing no difficulty, but there still being a few responsible for real obscurities.
OF, preposition ov. [Gr.]
1. From or out of; proceeding from, as the cause, source, means, author or agent bestowing.
I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered to you. 1 Corinthians 11:1.
For it was of the Lord to harden their hearts. Joshua 11:1.
It is of the Lord's mercies that we are not consumed.
Lamentations 3:1.
The whole disposing thereof is of the Lord. Proverbs 16:1.
Go, inquire of the Lord for me. 2 Chronicles 34:2.
That holy thing that shall be born of thee. Luke 1:1.
Hence of is the sign of the genitive case, the case that denotes production; as the son of man, the son proceeding from man, produced from man. This is the primary sense, although we now say, produced by man. 'Part of these were slain; ' that is, a number separate, for part denotes a division; the sense then is, a number from or out of the whole were slain. So also, 'some of these were slain; ' that is…
אַרְבֶּה (arbeh) refers to a kind of locust, specifically noted for its rapid increase. The term can also imply a locust swarm and has figurative meanings related to sudden disappearance, insignificance, and activity. It is derived from a root meaning to increase, as noted in Strong's entries.
אַרְבֶּה a kind of locust
base
H697 אַרְבֶּה a kind of locust
697 'arbeh ar-beh'
from 7235; a locust (from its rapid increase):--
grasshopper, locust.
see HEBREW for 07235
אַרְבֶּה (ar.beh) — locust.
1) a kind of locust, locust swarm (coll)
2) (CLBL)
2a) sudden disappearance (fig.)
2b) insignificance (fig.)
2c) activity (fig.)
Art | N-ms — Particle · noun common masculine singular absoluteHTd/Ncmsa
אָכַל (akal) means 'to eat' and encompasses a wide range of meanings, including literal consumption by humans and animals, as well as figurative uses like devouring by fire or destruction. It can describe actions such as feeding or causing to eat, and it also appears in contexts of oppression and destruction. The verb has various forms, indicating different subjects and nuances.
אָכַל 806 vb. eat
Qal
eat, human subject
of beasts, birds, etc., eat, devour
fig. of fire, devour, consume
of sword, devour, slay
in genl., devour, consume, destroy
fig. of oppression, devour the poor
Niph.
be eaten by man
be devoured by fire, consumed
be wasted, destroyed, of flesh
Pu. be consumed
Hiph.
cause to eat, feed with
cause to devoure, obj. sword
base
H398 אָכַל eat .. eat, human subject
. of beasts, birds, etc., eat, devour
. fig. of fire, devour, consume
. of sword, devour, slay
. in genl., devour, consume, destroy
. fig. of oppression, devour the poor
. . be eaten by man
. be devoured by fire, consumed
. be wasted, destroyed, of flesh
. be consumed
. . cause to eat, feed with
. cause to devoure, obj. sword
398 'akal aw-kal'
a primitive root; to eat (literally or figuratively):--X at
all, burn up, consume, devour(-er, up), dine, eat(-er, up),
feed (with), food, X freely, X in...wise(-deed, plenty), (lay)
meat, X quite.
אָכַל (a.khal) — to eat.
1) to eat, devour, burn up, feed
1a) (Qal)
1a1) to eat (human subject)
1a2) to eat, devour (of beasts and birds)
1a3) to devour, consume (of fire)
1a4) to devour, slay (of sword)
1a5) to devour, consume, destroy (inanimate subjects - ie, pestilence, drought)
1a6) to devour (of oppression)
1b) (Niphal)
1b1) to be eaten (by men)
1b2) to be devoured, consumed (of fire)
1b3) to be wasted, destroyed (of flesh)
1c) (Pual)
1c1) to cause to eat, feed with
1c2) to cause to devour
1d) (Hiphil)
1d1) to feed
1d2) to cause to eat
1e) (Piel)
1e1) consume
Aramaic equivalent: a.khal (אֲכַל "to devour" H0399)
V-Qal-Perf-3ms — Verb · Qal · perfect third person masculine singularHVqp3ms
יֶ֫לֶק (yekeq) refers to a young locust or caterpillar, derived from a root meaning to lick up or devour. The term specifically denotes the early developmental stage of locusts, emphasizing their consuming nature. It is mentioned in the context of devourers, particularly in agricultural settings.
יֶ֫לֶק n.m. a kind of locust
base
H3218 יֶ֫לֶק
3218 yekeq yeh'-lek
from an unused root meaning to lick up; a devourer;
specifically, the young locust:--cankerworm, caterpillar.
יֶ֫לֶק (ye.leq) — locust.
1) young locust (early stage of development)
1a) caterpillar (as devouring)
Art | N-ms — Particle · noun common masculine singular absoluteHTd/Ncmsa
The Hebrew word יֶ֫תֶר (*yether*) encompasses meanings related to remainder, excess, and excellence, as well as a small cord. It is derived from a root meaning 'to remain' and can refer to both a surplus or remnant and a physical string. The entries consistently highlight its dual meanings without significant disagreement.
יֶ֫תֶר 94 n.m. remainder, excellence, excess
base
יֶ֫תֶר n.m. cord (prop. as hanging over or down)
base
H3499a יֶ֫תֶר remainder, excellence, excess H3499b יֶ֫תֶר cord
3499 yether yeh'-ther
from 3498; properly, an overhanging, i.e. (by implication) an
excess, superiority, remainder; also a small rope (as hanging
free):--+ abundant, cord, exceeding, excellancy(-ent), what
they leave, that hath left, plentifully, remnant, residue,
rest, string, with.
see HEBREW for 03498
יֶ֫תֶר (ye.ter) — remainder.
1) remainder, excess, rest, remnant, excellence
1a) remainder, remnant
1b) remainder, rest, other part
1c) excess
1d) abundantly (adv)
1e) abundance, affluence
1f) superiority, excellency
יֶ֫תֶר (ye.ter) — cord.
cord
Conj | N-ms — Conjunction · noun common masculine singular constructHC/Ncmsc
ov:
(1) In Anglo-Saxon, had the meaning "from," "away from" (as the strengthened form "off" has still), and was not used for genitive or possessive relations, these being expressed by special case-forms. In the Norman period, however, "of" was taken to represent the French de (a use well developed by the time of Chaucer), and in the Elizabethan period both senses of "of" were in common use. But after about 1600 the later force of the word became predominant, and in the earlier sense (which is now practically obsolete) it was replaced by other prepositions. In consequence the King James Version (and in some cases the Revised Version (British and American)) contains many uses of "of" that are no longer familiar--most of them, to be sure, causing no difficulty, but there still being a few responsible for real obscurities.
OF, preposition ov. [Gr.]
1. From or out of; proceeding from, as the cause, source, means, author or agent bestowing.
I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered to you. 1 Corinthians 11:1.
For it was of the Lord to harden their hearts. Joshua 11:1.
It is of the Lord's mercies that we are not consumed.
Lamentations 3:1.
The whole disposing thereof is of the Lord. Proverbs 16:1.
Go, inquire of the Lord for me. 2 Chronicles 34:2.
That holy thing that shall be born of thee. Luke 1:1.
Hence of is the sign of the genitive case, the case that denotes production; as the son of man, the son proceeding from man, produced from man. This is the primary sense, although we now say, produced by man. 'Part of these were slain; ' that is, a number separate, for part denotes a division; the sense then is, a number from or out of the whole were slain. So also, 'some of these were slain; ' that is…
יֶ֫לֶק (yekeq) refers to a young locust or caterpillar, derived from a root meaning to lick up or devour. The term specifically denotes the early developmental stage of locusts, emphasizing their consuming nature. It is mentioned in the context of devourers, particularly in agricultural settings.
יֶ֫לֶק n.m. a kind of locust
base
H3218 יֶ֫לֶק
3218 yekeq yeh'-lek
from an unused root meaning to lick up; a devourer;
specifically, the young locust:--cankerworm, caterpillar.
יֶ֫לֶק (ye.leq) — locust.
1) young locust (early stage of development)
1a) caterpillar (as devouring)
Art | N-ms — Particle · noun common masculine singular absoluteHTd/Ncmsa
אָכַל (akal) means 'to eat' and encompasses a wide range of meanings, including literal consumption by humans and animals, as well as figurative uses like devouring by fire or destruction. It can describe actions such as feeding or causing to eat, and it also appears in contexts of oppression and destruction. The verb has various forms, indicating different subjects and nuances.
אָכַל 806 vb. eat
Qal
eat, human subject
of beasts, birds, etc., eat, devour
fig. of fire, devour, consume
of sword, devour, slay
in genl., devour, consume, destroy
fig. of oppression, devour the poor
Niph.
be eaten by man
be devoured by fire, consumed
be wasted, destroyed, of flesh
Pu. be consumed
Hiph.
cause to eat, feed with
cause to devoure, obj. sword
base
H398 אָכַל eat .. eat, human subject
. of beasts, birds, etc., eat, devour
. fig. of fire, devour, consume
. of sword, devour, slay
. in genl., devour, consume, destroy
. fig. of oppression, devour the poor
. . be eaten by man
. be devoured by fire, consumed
. be wasted, destroyed, of flesh
. be consumed
. . cause to eat, feed with
. cause to devoure, obj. sword
398 'akal aw-kal'
a primitive root; to eat (literally or figuratively):--X at
all, burn up, consume, devour(-er, up), dine, eat(-er, up),
feed (with), food, X freely, X in...wise(-deed, plenty), (lay)
meat, X quite.
אָכַל (a.khal) — to eat.
1) to eat, devour, burn up, feed
1a) (Qal)
1a1) to eat (human subject)
1a2) to eat, devour (of beasts and birds)
1a3) to devour, consume (of fire)
1a4) to devour, slay (of sword)
1a5) to devour, consume, destroy (inanimate subjects - ie, pestilence, drought)
1a6) to devour (of oppression)
1b) (Niphal)
1b1) to be eaten (by men)
1b2) to be devoured, consumed (of fire)
1b3) to be wasted, destroyed (of flesh)
1c) (Pual)
1c1) to cause to eat, feed with
1c2) to cause to devour
1d) (Hiphil)
1d1) to feed
1d2) to cause to eat
1e) (Piel)
1e1) consume
Aramaic equivalent: a.khal (אֲכַל "to devour" H0399)
V-Qal-Perf-3ms — Verb · Qal · perfect third person masculine singularHVqp3ms
חָסִיל (chaciyl) refers to a type of locust or caterpillar, derived from the root meaning 'ravager.' The entries consistently describe it as a locust, with no significant disagreement among the lexicons.
חָסִיל n.m. a kind of locust
base
H2625 חָסִיל a kind of locust
2625 chaciyl khaw-seel'
from 2628; the ravager, i.e. a locust:--caterpillar.
see HEBREW for 02628
חָסִיל (cha.sil) — locust.
locust
Art | N-ms — Particle · noun common masculine singular absoluteHTd/Ncmsa