Daniel 2:24 — Word Study
WLCכָּל־ קֳבֵ֣ל דְּנָ֗ה דָּֽנִיֵּאל֙ עַ֣ל עַל־ אַרְי֔וֹךְ דִּ֚י מַנִּ֣י מַלְכָּ֔א לְהוֹבָדָ֖ה לְחַכִּימֵ֣י בָבֶ֑ל אֲזַ֣ל׀ וְכֵ֣ן אֲמַר־ לֵ֗הּ לְחַכִּימֵ֤י בָבֶל֙ אַל־ תְּהוֹבֵ֔ד הַעֵ֙לְנִי֙ קֳדָ֣ם מַלְכָּ֔א וּפִשְׁרָ֖א לְמַלְכָּ֥א אֲחַוֵּֽא׃ ס
BSAThereforeqᵉbêl ◂DanielDânîyêʼl [the prophet, God's judge] wentʻălal toʻal AriochʼĂryôwk [the king's appointed official, lion-like] whomdîy the kingmelek [the ruler, monarch] had appointedmᵉnâʼ [ordained, assigned] to destroyʼăbad [to perish, annihilate] the wise menchakkîym [intelligent, knowledgeable ones] of BabylonBabel [the city of confusion, mixing] and saidʼămar ◂Do notʼal [nothing] executeʼăbad [destroy, kill] the wise menchakkîym [learned, discerning ones] of BabylonBabel [Babel, the empire] Bring meʻălal [introduce me, present me] beforeqŏdâm [in the presence of, face to face with] the kingmelek [the ruler, sovereign] and I will givechăvâʼ [show, explain] himmelek the interpretationpᵉshar [the meaning, explanation]
| Greek | English | Parsing |
|---|---|---|
| כָּל־ | as to | Preposition, preposition |
| קֳבֵ֣ל | because | Noun common, both singular absolute |
| דְּנָ֗ה | this | Particle |
| דָּֽנִיֵּאל֙ | Daniel | Noun proper masculine |
| עַ֣ל | he went in | Verb, Qal, perfect third person masculine singular |
| עַל־ | to | Preposition |
| אַרְי֔וֹךְ | Arioch | Noun proper masculine |
| דִּ֚י | whom | Conjunction |
| מַנִּ֣י | he had appointed | Verb, Piel, perfect third person masculine singular |
| מַלְכָּ֔א | king the | Noun common both singular determined, particle |
| לְהוֹבָדָ֖ה | to destroy | Preposition, verb hiphil infinitive construct common |
| לְחַכִּימֵ֣י | the object marker [the] wise men of | Preposition |
| בָבֶ֑ל | Babylon | Noun proper |
| אֲזַ֣ל׀ | he went | Verb, Qal, perfect third person masculine singular |
| וְכֵ֣ן | and as follows | Conjunction, adverb |
| אֲמַר־ | he said | Verb, Qal, perfect third person masculine singular |
| לֵ֗הּ | to him | Preposition, suffix |
| לְחַכִּימֵ֤י | the object marker [the] wise men of | Preposition |
| בָבֶל֙ | Babylon | Noun proper |
| אַל־ | may not | Particle |
| תְּהוֹבֵ֔ד | you destroy | Verb, Hiphil, imperfect third person feminine singular |
| הַעֵ֙לְנִי֙ | bring in me | Verb hiphil imperative second person masculine singular, suffix |
| קֳדָ֣ם | before | Noun common, both singular construct |
| מַלְכָּ֔א | king the | Noun common both singular determined, particle |
| וּפִשְׁרָ֖א | and interpretation the | Conjunction, noun common both singular determined, particle |
| לְמַלְכָּ֥א | to king the | Preposition, noun common both singular determined, particle |
| אֲחַוֵּֽא׃ ס | I will declare | Verb, Piel, imperfect first person common singular |
Every word in the verse. Click a row to open it in the panel on the left.
| BSB | Therefore Daniel went to Arioch, whom the king had appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon, and said to him, “Do not execute the wise men of Babylon! Bring me before the king, and I will give him the interpretation.” |
| KJV | ¶ Therefore Daniel went in unto Arioch, whom the king had ordained to destroy the wise men of Babylon: he went and said thus unto him; Destroy not the wise men of Babylon: bring me in before the king, and I will shew unto the king the interpretation. |
| ASV | Therefore Daniel went in unto Arioch, whom the king had appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon; he went and said thus unto him: Destroy not the wise men of Babylon; bring me in before the king, and I will show unto the king the interpretation. |
| YLT | Therefore Daniel hath gone up unto Arioch, whom the king hath appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon; he hath gone, and thus hath said to him, 'The wise men of Babylon thou dost not destroy, bring me up before the king, and the interpretation to the king I do shew.' |
| WEB | Therefore Daniel went in to Arioch, whom the king had appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon. He went and said this to him: “Don’t destroy the wise men of Babylon. Bring me in before the king, and I will show to the king the interpretation.” |
| BBE | For this reason Daniel went to Arioch, to whom the king had given orders for the destruction of the wise men of Babylon, and said to him, Do not put to death the wise men of Babylon: take me in before the king and I will make clear to him the sense of the dream. |
Where they part company is אֲחַוֵּֽא — see How Translations Differ.
The sentence contains a main clause followed by a relative clause and direct speech, emphasizing the urgency of Daniel's request.
8 commentators on this verse
Gill, Jamieson, Poole, Trapp & more — read them ›
clause
subjectדָּנִיֵּאל
verbעֲלַל
The sentence as the grammar sees it Open the tree ›
Every word here is used elsewhere in the Old Testament.
Bars are logarithmic — אֵת, the commonest word in the Hebrew Bible, stands about 11,000 times, so a linear scale would leave everything else invisible. Click a row to open that word.
Deep Study — Daniel 2:24
Sections marked generated are written from the data on this page rather than by a named author. Everything else — the lexicon entries, the cross references, the manuscript readings, the counts — is quoted from its source unchanged.
Context — Daniel's Plea to Ariochgenerated
Daniel 2:24 describes how Daniel, upon receiving revelation from God, goes to Arioch, who was tasked by the king to execute the wise men of Babylon. Daniel's request is urgent; he seeks to save these men by offering to interpret the king's troubling dream. This moment highlights the tension between divine wisdom and human authority, as Daniel steps forward with confidence to intervene on behalf of others.
Cross References
| Reference | Text (BSB) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daniel 2:12–13 | This response made the king so furious with anger that he gave orders to destroy all the wise men of Babylon. |
| 2 | Acts 27:24 | and said, ‘Do not be afraid, Paul; you must stand before Caesar. And look, God has granted you the lives of all who sail with you.’ |
The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge — 2 references, hung on the phrase they belong to
The Key Word — אֲחַוֵּֽא, 'a.cha.Ve'generated
The verb אֲחַוֵּֽא ('a.cha.Ve) is in the imperfect form, indicating a future action: 'I will declare' or 'I will show.' It is derived from the root חָוָה (H2324), which means to show or to declare. This reflects Daniel's role as a prophet who reveals God's interpretations.
In this context, Daniel's declaration is not merely about sharing information; it is an act of revealing divine insight that can save lives. His use of the verb emphasizes both his authority and the urgency of the situation.
How Translations Differ — measured against the Berean Standard Biblegenerated
This study reads the verse in the Berean Standard Bible, so the BSB is the wording every comparison below is made against. The BSB uses show, which aligns with the intent of Daniel's declaration.
Where translations differ, they do so primarily in the rendering of אֲחַוֵּֽא: I will declare (GNV), show (ASV, LSV, WEB), and explain (FBV). Each version captures the essence of Daniel's promise to provide understanding.
Sentence Structuregenerated
The main verb of the verse is אֲמַר, he said, which governs the entire sentence. This is followed by a series of phrases that detail the action Daniel is taking: a prepositional phrase indicating to whom he is speaking, and a direct address to Arioch.
The structure emphasizes Daniel's assertiveness as he interjects into a dire situation, using a clear command to save the wise men, which is a significant turning point in the narrative.
Septuagint Backgroundgenerated
The Septuagint translates אֲחַוֵּֽא with the Greek word ἀναγγείλω, meaning 'I will announce' or 'I will declare.' This choice suggests a broader interpretation of Daniel's role as a messenger of divine revelation, emphasizing the act of proclaiming rather than merely showing.
This translation reflects the urgency and importance of Daniel's message, aligning with the overall theme of divine intervention in human affairs.
In plain words — the whole versegenerated
Daniel 2:24 shows how Daniel intervenes to save the wise men of Babylon from execution. He approaches Arioch, the king's official, and asks him not to kill them, promising to interpret the king's dream. This moment highlights Daniel's bravery and his role as a prophet.
Frequently Asked Questionsgenerated
Daniel's request to spare the wise men indicates his compassion and willingness to act on behalf of others, showcasing his faith in God's revelation.
Daniel's interpretation is crucial as it not only reveals the meaning of the king's dream but also has the potential to save lives, demonstrating the power of divine insight.
Arioch is the king's appointed official responsible for executing the wise men, but he becomes a key figure in Daniel's plea for mercy.
This verse illustrates the conflict between human authority and divine wisdom, a recurring theme in the book of Daniel, where God's plans prevail despite earthly powers.
Reflection Questionsgenerated
- In what ways can I advocate for others in difficult situations, as Daniel did?
- How can I seek divine wisdom in my own life and share it with others?
- What does this passage teach about the importance of intervention and mercy?
- How can I apply Daniel's example of faith and courage in my daily life?
The early church on this verse — how the Fathers read it
Early interpretations of this verse highlight its significance in understanding divine intervention and the role of the prophet. Quotations from early Church Fathers are presented here to illustrate their insights.
Verse 24. "Destroy not the wise men of Babylon. Take me in before the king and I will set forth the explanation to the king.Early Church Fathers on Daniel 2 →
Let us not then be looking open-mouthed toward others. For it is true, the prayers of the saints have the greatest power, on condition, however, of our repentance and change.Early Church Fathers on Daniel 2 →
For nothing is so advantageous and so likely to pacify the hearers as to say nothing about one’s self of an honorable nature, but on the contrary, to forestall all suspicion of wishing to do so.Early Church Fathers on Daniel 2 →
Commentators on this verse — 8 expositors, verse by verse
Each of these wrote on Daniel 2:24 itself, not merely on the chapter around it.
John Gill1697–1771Gill's Exposition of the Entire BibleTherefore Daniel went in unto Arioch,.... Into his apartments at court, or wherever he was in quest of the wise men, of which Daniel had knowledge; this he did as soon as the secret was revealed to
Read John Gill on Daniel 2 →Robert Jamieson1802–1880Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown's CommentaryTherefore Daniel went in unto Arioch, whom the king had ordained to destroy the wise men of Babylon: he went and said thus unto him; Destroy not the wise men of Babylon: bring me in before the king,
Read Robert Jamieson on Daniel 2 →Matthew Poole1624–1679Matthew Poole's Commentary on the Holy BibleBeing now prepared, he goes to Arioch to go in with him to the king; and bid him stay his hand, and not destroy the wise men of Babylon. Arioch might plead the king’ s command, Daniel tells him that was because they could not tell the king’ s dream: come, saith he, I will show that; by that I take away the ground of thy commission to destroy. Quest. Did Daniel do well in desiring to have them spared, who deserved to die for their unlawful arts, diviners, necromancers, &c.? Answ. Two things are usually answered to this: 1. They were not all such, some were innocent, studied arts and sciences lawful and laudable. 2. Those that were otherwise, he pleaded not for them as such, but for justice…
Read Matthew Poole on Daniel 2 →John Trapp1601–1669Trapp's Complete Commentary on the Old and New TestamentsDaniel 2:24 Therefore Daniel went in unto Arioch, whom the king had ordained to destroy the wise [men] of Babylon: he went and said thus unto him; Destroy not the wise [men] of Babylon: bring me in before the king, and I will shew unto the king the interpretation.Ver. 24. Destroy not the wise men of Babylon.] Who yet wished Daniel destroyed. This was a noble kind of revenge, to "overcome evil with good."
Read John Trapp on Daniel 2 →Charles John Ellicott1819–1905Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers(24) Therefore—i.e., now that he knows the dream and the interpretation. Daniel approached the king through Arioch, for it is probable that the Babylonian custom, like the Persian (Esther 5:1) or Median (Herod. i. 99), did not permit any persons except the principal officers of state to have direct access to the royal presence. We must suppose that in Daniel 2:16 (where see Note) Daniel approached the king as he does here, through Arioch, the captain of the guard. Destroy not.—Observe Daniel’s humanity towards his heathen teachers. It was owing to his intercession only that the king’s decree was not carried out. (See Ezekiel 14:14.)
Read Charles John Ellicott on Daniel 2 →AdamClarkeAdam Clarke's Commentary on the BibleVerse 24. Destroy not the wise men] The decree was suspended till it should be seen whether Daniel could tell the dream, and give its interpretation.
Read AdamClarke on Daniel 2 →CambridgeThe Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges24–30. Daniel, brought by Arioch into Nebuchadnezzar’s presence, professes his readiness to declare and interpret to him his dream.
Read Cambridge on Daniel 2 →Albert Barnes1798–1870Barnes' Notes on the BibleTherefore Daniel went in, unto Arioch - In view of the fact that the matter was now disclosed to him, he proposed to lay it before the king.
Read Albert Barnes on Daniel 2 →The verse in English, compared — 17 translations, and where they part company
Every translation on this page is a decision someone had to make and commit to. Read down a column and you see one translator's judgement; read across a row and you see the range the Greek actually allows. The BSB is the wording the rest of this page is measured against, so it is listed first.
Modern formal
Therefore Daniel went to Arioch, whom the king had appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon, and said to him, “Do not execute the wise men of Babylon! Bring me before the king, and I will give him the interpretation.”
Therefore Daniel went in to Arioch, whom the king had appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon. He went and said this to him: “Don’t destroy the wise men of Babylon. Bring me in before the king, and I will show to the king the interpretation.”
Therefore Daniel went to Arioch, whom the king had appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon, and said to him, “Do not execute the wise men of Babylon! Bring me before the king, and I will give him the interpretation.”
Then Daniel went in to see Arioch (whom the king had appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon). He came and said to him, “Don’t destroy the wise men of Babylon! Escort me to the king, and I will disclose the interpretation to him!”
Tyndale line
¶ Therefore Daniel went in unto Arioch, whom the king had ordained to destroy the wise men of Babylon: he went and said thus unto him; Destroy not the wise men of Babylon: bring me in before the king, and I will shew unto the king the interpretation.
Therefore Daniel went in unto Arioch, whom the king had appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon; he went and said thus unto him: Destroy not the wise men of Babylon; bring me in before the king, and I will show unto the king the interpretation.
Therefore Daniel went in unto Arioch, whom the king had appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon: he went and said thus unto him; Destroy not the wise men of Babylon: bring me in before the king, and I will shew unto the king the interpretation.
Therefore Daniel went into Arioch, whom the king had ordained to destroy the wise men of Babylon: he went and said thus to him; Destroy not the wise men of Babylon: bring me in before the king, and I will show to the king the interpretation.
Therefore Daniel went vnto Arioch, whome the King had ordeyned to destroy the wise men of Babel: he went and sayde thus vnto him, Destroy not the wise men of Babel, but bring me before the King, and I will declare vnto the King the interpretation.
Strictly literal
Therefore Daniel went in unto Arioch, whom the king had appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon; he went and said thus unto him: Destroy not the wise men of Babylon; bring me in before the king, and I will shew unto the king the interpretation.
Therefore Daniel hath gone up unto Arioch, whom the king hath appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon; he hath gone, and thus hath said to him, 'The wise men of Babylon thou dost not destroy, bring me up before the king, and the interpretation to the king I do shew.'
Therefore Daniel has gone up to Arioch, whom the king has appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon; he has gone, and thus has said to him, “You do not destroy the wise men of Babylon, bring me up before the king, and I show the interpretation to the king.”
Therefore did Daniel go in unto Aryoch, whom the king had ordered to destroy the wise men of Babylon, He went and said thus unto him, the wise men of Babylon must thou not destroy: bring me before the king, and I will tell unto the king the interpretation.
Then Daniel went in to see Arioch (the one the king appointed to kill everyone who was wise in Babylon). He went and said to him, “Do not kill the wise men in Babylon. Take me to the king and I will show the king the interpretation of his dream.”
From the Latin
After this Daniel went in to Arioch, to whom the king had given orders to destroy the wise men of Babylon, and he spoke thus to him: Destroy not the wise men of Babylon: bring me in before the king, and I will tell the solution to the king.
Simplified
So Daniel went to Arioch whom the king had ordered to execute the wise men of Babylon and told him, “Don't execute the wise men of Babylon! Take me to see the king and I will explain to him his dream.”
For this reason Daniel went to Arioch, to whom the king had given orders for the destruction of the wise men of Babylon, and said to him, Do not put to death the wise men of Babylon: take me in before the king and I will make clear to him the sense of the dream.
Word by word, the decisions they made
Counted from the translations carried on this site, not from a survey of every English Bible. A rendering shared by many versions is usually inherited rather than independently arrived at — the Tyndale line in particular runs through most of them.
The sentence as the grammar sees it — from the MACULA Hebrew treebank
This is not our own analysis: it is the scholarly syntax tree for the verse, showing how the clause actually holds together.
Boxes are the grammarian's groupings — clause, noun phrase, prepositional phrase.
The four witnesses to this verse — Masoretic, Septuagint, Samaritan, Qumran
The Masoretic Text and the Dead Sea Scrolls largely agree on the wording of this verse, with the scrolls preserving much of the text while also indicating some restoration. The Septuagint, however, presents a different structure, reflecting a distinct interpretive approach.
כָּל־ קֳבֵ֣ל דְּנָ֗ה דָּֽנִיֵּאל֙ עַ֣ל עַל־ אַרְי֔וֹךְ דִּ֚י מַנִּ֣י מַלְכָּ֔א לְהוֹבָדָ֖ה לְחַכִּימֵ֣י בָבֶ֑ל אֲזַ֣ל׀ וְכֵ֣ן אֲמַר־ לֵ֗הּ לְחַכִּימֵ֤י בָבֶל֙ אַל־ תְּהוֹבֵ֔ד הַעֵ֙לְנִי֙ קֳדָ֣ם מַלְכָּ֔א וּפִשְׁרָ֖א לְמַלְכָּ֥א אֲחַוֵּֽא׃ ס
9 of the 27 words are matched. This is the word-by-word correspondence, not the Septuagint's own sentence — its word order and its articles are its own.
לדניאל על אריוך [די] [מני] מלכ [א] להובדא לחכימי בבל אזל וכן אמר [ל׳ה] [לחכימי] [בבל] [אל] תהובד העל׳ני קדם מלכ [א] [ופשר׳ה] למלכ א אהחוה
26 words of the verse are on this fragment — 4 partly restored, 9 supplied entire by an editor.
Four traditions, not one. “On the leather” means the letters physically survive on the scroll, as against letters an editor has supplied to fill a hole in it — a restoration is a scholar’s reading, not a reading of the manuscript. Words in [square brackets] are supplied; the notes count them apart from what survives.
The map of this verse — what each word keeps company with
This is a map of two things, both counted rather than judged. Company kept: which words stand within three words of each of these, anywhere in the Hebrew Bible — the thicker the line, the more often the pair meet compared with chance. Built from: the words a word is made out of, taken from its own Strong’s entry. It is not a map of meaning: nothing here claims two words mean the same thing. Click any circle to see the numbers behind it.
Lexicons — every word in Daniel 2:24
One dossier per word, with every reference work grouped by kind — Hebrew lexicons, morphology, Bible dictionaries, topical chains and the English of the translators themselves. The verse sits at the head of each block with the word under study lit, so you never lose your place. The panel above gives the short answer; this is the long one, and it is the part of the page worth indexing.
Every entry below is the lexicographer's own text. On the Hebrew: Brown-Driver-Briggs entire and its gloss set, Strong's Hebrew Dictionary, and Tyndale House's Translators Brief lexicon. Where a cell says a work has no entry, that work genuinely has none for this word.
/ל (l) — to/for.
Prefix lamed: to
AR/R — Preposition · prepositionAR/R
az: Conj. and adverb (usually Greek hos hosper, kathos), designating:
(1) Likeness: (a) between nouns (Ge 3:5; Jud 6:5; Php 2:8; Heb 11:27,29); (b) between verbs (Lu 6:36; Joh 5:30; 1Co 10:7); (c) between adjectives (1Co 15:48).
(2) Limitation (with respect to a particular aspect or relation) (1Pe 4:15,16).
קֳבֵל, transliterated as qbel, is an Aramaic word meaning 'before' or 'in front of.' It functions as a noun, preposition, conjunction, and adverb, conveying ideas of location and causation, such as 'because of' or 'therefore.' The entries indicate that it is derived from a related term, קָבַל (H6905), and cover a range of uses in context.
קֳבֵל 29 subst. front, as prep. in front of, before, because of; as conj. because that
base
H6903 קֳבֵל, קְבֵל
6903 qbel keb-ale'
(Aramaic) or qobel (Aramaic) {kob-ale'}; (corresponding to
6905; (adverbially) in front of; usually (with other
particles) on account of, so as, since, hence:--+ according
to, + as, + because, before, + for this cause, + forasmuch as,
+ by this means, over against, by reason of, + that, +
therefore, + though, + wherefore.
see HEBREW for 06905
קֳבֵל (qe.vel) — before.
subst
1) front
prep
2) in front of, before, because of, in view of, by reason of, because of this, therefore
conj
3) because that, inasmuch as, although, according as, before
adv
4) accordingly, then
קֳבֵל (qe.vel) — before: because.
subst
1) front
prep
2) in front of, before, because of, in view of, by reason of, because of this, therefore
conj
3) because that, inasmuch as, although, according as, before
adv
4) accordingly, then
Adj — Noun common · both singular absoluteANcbsa
be-kos' (hina, "in order that"): "The multitude rebuked them, because (AV; the Revised Version (British and American) "that") they should hold their peace" (Mt 20:31).
דְּנָה (denah) is an Aramaic word meaning 'this' and is used as a demonstrative pronoun. It can also imply 'therefore' or 'on account of this.' The entries indicate that it is an orthographical variation of another word, דָּן (dan), but do not provide specific Old Testament references.
דְּנָה 57 demonstr.pr.comm. this
base
H1836 דְּנָה, דֵּן
1836 den dane
(Aramaic) an orthographical variation of 1791; this:--
(afore-)time, + after this manner, here (-after),
one...another, such, there(-fore), these, this (matter), +
thus, where(-fore), which.
see HEBREW for 01791
דְּנָה (de.nah) — this.
demons pron
1) this, on account of this
adv
2) therefore
ATm — ParticleATm
דָּנִיֵּאל (Daniye'l) refers to the biblical figure Daniel, a prophet known for his interpretations of dreams during the Babylonian exile. His name means 'God is my judge.' Daniel is recognized as the fourth of the major prophets and is also called Belteshazzar. He is first mentioned in Ezra 8:2 and noted for his holiness, as acknowledged by Ezekiel.
דָּנִיֵּאל n.pr.m. Daniel (BH id.)
base
H1841 דָּנִיֵּאל
1841 Daniye'l daw-nee-yale'
(Aramaic) corresponding to 1840; Danijel, the Heb.
prophet:--Daniel.
see HEBREW for 01840
דָּנִיֵּאל, דָּנִאֵל (da.niy.yel) — Daniel.
A man living at the time of Exile and Return, first mentioned at Ezr.8.2
§ Daniel = "God is my judge"
1) the 4th of the greater prophets, taken as hostage in the first deportation to Babylon, because of the gift of God of the interpretation of dreams, he became the 2nd in command of the Babylon empire and lasted through the end of the Babylonian empire and into the Persian empire. His prophecies are the key to the understanding of end time events. Noted for his purity and holiness by contemporary prophet, Ezekiel
1a) also, 'Belteshazzar' (H01095 or H01096)
דָּנִיֵּאל, דָּנִאֵל (da.niy.yel) — Daniel.
A prophet living at the time of Exile and Return, first mentioned at Ezk.14.14; also called Belteshazzar at Dan.1.7; 2.26; 4.8,9,18,19; 5.12; 10.1;
Adj — Noun proper masculineANpm
dan'-yel (daniye'l, dani'-el, "God is my judge"; Daniel):
(1) One of the sons of David (1Ch 3:1).
(2) A Levite of the family of Ithamar (Ezr 8:2; Ne 10:6).
(3) A prophet of the time of Nebuchadnezzar and Cyrus, the hero and author of the Book of Daniel.
1. Early Life:
We know nothing of the early life of Daniel, except what is recorded in the book bearing his name. Here it is said that he was one of the youths of royal or noble seed, who were carried captive by Nebuchadnezzar in the third year of Jehoiakim, king of Judah. These youths were without blemish, well-favored, skillful in all wisdom, endued with knowledge, and understanding science, and such as had ability to stand in the king's palace. The king commanded to teach them the…
Daniel
God is my judge, or judge of God. (1.) David’s second son, “born unto him in Hebron, of Abigail the Carmelitess” (1 Chr. 3:1). He is called also Chileab (2 Sam. 3:3).
(2.) One of the four great prophets, although he is not once spoken of in the Old Testament as a prophet. His life and prophecies are recorded in the Book of Daniel. He was descended from one of the noble families of Judah (Dan. 1:3), and was probably born in Jerusalem about B.C. 623, during the reign of Josiah. At the first deportation of the Jews by Nebuchadnezzar (the kingdom of Israel had come to an end nearly a century before), or immediately after his victory over the Egyptians at the second battle of Carchemish, in the fourth year of the reign of…
(judgment of God). The second son of David, by Abigail the Carmelitess. (1 Chronicles 3:1) In (2 Samuel 3:3) he is called Chileab. (B.C. about 1051.) The fourth of ’the greater prophets." Nothing is known of his parentage or family. He appears, however, to have been of royal or noble descent, (Daniel 1:3) and to have possessed considerable personal endowments. (Daniel 1:4) He was taken to Babylon in "the third year of Jehoiakim" (B.C. 604), and trained for the king’s service. He was divinely supported in his resolve to abstain from the "king’s meat" for fear of defilement. (Daniel 1:8-16) At the close of his three years…
1. Called Belteshazzar by the Chaldeans, a prophet descended from the royal family of David, who was carried captive to Babylon, when very young, in the fourth year of Jehoiakim king of Judah, B. C. 606. He was chosen, with his three companions, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, to reside at Nebuchadnezzar’s court, where he received a suitable education, and made great progress in all the sciences of the Chaldeans, but declined to pollute himself by eating provisions from the king’s table, which would often be ceremonially unclean to a Jew, or defiled by some connection with idol-worship. At the end of their three years’ education, Daniel and his companions excelled all others, and received honorable appointments in the royal service. Here Daniel soon displayed his prophetic gifts in interpreting a dream of Nebuchadnezzar, by whom he was made governor of Babylon, and head of the learned…
עֲלַל (alal) is a Hebrew verb meaning to come in or go in, with various forms indicating different nuances such as thrusting oneself in or introducing. It appears in both active and passive forms, including to bring in and to be brought in. The entries suggest a focus on the act of entering or introducing something.
[עֲלַל] vb. go or come in
Pe.
Haph. bring in
Hoph. be brought
base
H5954 עֲלַל
5954 `alal al-al'
(Aramaic) corresponding to 5953 (in the sense of thrusting
oneself in), to enter; causatively, to introduce:--bring in,
come in, go in.
see HEBREW for 05953
עֲלַל (a.lal) — to come.
1) to thrust in, go in, come in
1a) (P'al) to go in, come in
1b) (Aphel) to bring in
1c) (Hophal) to be brought in
Adj — Verb · Qal · perfect third person masculine singularAVqp3ms
A principal thing to notice about this preposition, which in the King James Version represents about 16 Hebrew and as many Greek words and prepositions, is that, in hundreds of cases (especially in the Old Testament, but frequently also in the New Testament) in the Revised Version (British and American) the rendering is changed to more exact forms ("to," "unto," "by," "upon," "at," "with," "among," "for," "throughout," etc.; compare e.g. Ge 6:16; 13:8; 17:7,9,12; 18:1; Ex 8:17; Le 1:9, etc.); while, nearly as often, "in" is substituted for divergent forms of the King James Version (e.g. Ge 2:14; 17:11; 31:54; 40:7; 49:17; Ex…
עַל (al) is a preposition meaning 'upon,' 'over,' or 'against.' It covers a range of uses, including direction, comparison, and causation. The entries indicate it can express relationships concerning location, purpose, or authority. There is a note that it corresponds to the Aramaic term related to another Hebrew word, עַל (H5921), but no significant disagreement among lexicons is noted.
עַל prep. upon, over, on account of, above, to, against
base
H5922 עַל
5922 `al al
(Aramaic) corresponding to 5921:--about, against,
concerning, for, (there-)fore, from, in, X more, of, (there-,
up-)on, (in-)to, + why with.
see HEBREW for 05921
עַל (al) — since.
1) upon, over, on account of, above, to, against
1a) upon, over, on account of, regarding, concerning, on behalf of
1b) over (with verbs of ruling)
1c) above, beyond (in comparison)
1d) to, against (of direction)
Adj — PrepositionAR
אַרְיוֹךְ (Aryowk) refers to a name of foreign origin, specifically associated with two Babylonians: a king of Ellasar mentioned in Genesis 14:1 and a chief executioner for Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 2:14. The name is interpreted to mean 'lion-like.'
אַרְיוֹךְ n.pr.m. king of Ellasar
base
אֲרְיוֹךְ n.pr.m. in Bab.
base
H746a אַרְיוֹךְ king of Ellasar H746b אֲרְיוֹךְ in Bab.
746 'Aryowk ar-yoke'
of foreign origin; Arjok, the name of two
Babylonians:--Arioch.
אַרְיוֹךְ (ar.yokh) — Arioch.
A man living at the time of the Patriarchs, first mentioned at Gen.14.1
§ Arioch = "lion-like"
the ancient king of Ellasar, ally of Chedorlaomer
אֲרְיוֹךְ (a.re.yokh) — Arioch.
A man living at the time of Exile and Return, first mentioned at Dan.2.14
§ Arioch = "lion-like"
the chief of the executioners for Nebuchadnezzar
Adj — Noun proper masculineANpm
ar'-i-ok: ('aryokh):
(1) The name of the vassal king of Ellasar, under Chedorlaomer, king of Elam, and Amraphel, king of Shinar (Babylonia), who took part in the expedition against Sodom, Gomorrah and other states (Ge 14:1,9). Assyriologists generally, and probably rightly, identify Arioch with Eri-Aku (which see), king of Larsa, Ellasar being for Al-Larsa (now Sinqara in central Babylonia).
Texts Referring to the Reign of Arioch:
For an account of the expedition see AMRAPHEL, and for the Babylonian texts bearing upon the reign, see ERI-AKU. In Ge 14:1,9, where the names of the allied kings who marched against the Cities of the Plain are given, that of Arioch follows his more immediate suzerain, Amraphel, and not Chedorlaomer, who, however, appears to have been the real overlord…
Arioch
Lion-like, venerable. (1.) A king of Ellasar who was confederate with Chedorlamer (Gen. 14:1,9). The tablets recently discovered by Mr. Pinches (see CHALDEA) show the true reading is Eri-Aku of Larsa. This Elamite name meant “servant of the moon-god.” It was afterwards changed into Rimsin, “Have mercy, O moon-god.” (2.) Dan. 2:14.
(venerable). The king of Eliasar, one of the allies of Chedorlaomer in his expedition against his rebellious tributaries. (Genesis 14:1) (B.C. 1921-1912.) The captain of Nebuchadnezzar’s body-guard. (Daniel 2:14) etc. Properly Eirioch , or Erioch , mentioned in Judith 1:6 as king of the Elymaeans.
דִּי (diy) is an Aramaic word meaning 'that,' functioning as a relative conjunction and a preposition in various contexts. It can indicate relationships such as 'who,' 'which,' or 'because,' and is used in adverbial phrases. The entries highlight its role in connecting clauses and marking possession.
דִּי part. of relation, who, which, that, used also as mark of gen. and conj. that, because
base
H1768 דִּי
1768 diy dee
(Aramaic) apparently for 1668; that, used as relative
conjunction, and especially (with a preposition) in adverbial
phrases; also as preposition of:--X as, but, for(-asmuch +), +
now, of, seeing, than, that, therefore, until, + what
(-soever), when, which, whom, whose.
see HEBREW for 01668
דִּי (di) — that.
part of relation
1) who, which, that
mark of genitive
2) that of, which belongs to, that
conj
3) that, because
Adj — ConjunctionAC
מְנָה (mənā) means to count or appoint, with uses in both the P'al and Pael forms indicating numbering and appointing. The entries suggest a focus on the act of reckoning or ordaining something. The word is linked to the Aramaic roots, indicating a broader linguistic connection.
מְנָה vb. number, reckon
Pe. God has numbered
Pa. appoint
base
H4483 מְנָה, מְנָא
4483 mna' men-aw'
(Aramaic) or mnah (Aramaic) {men-aw'}; corresponding to 4487;
to count, appoint:--number, ordain, set.
see HEBREW for 04487
מְנָה (me.nah) — to reckon/appoint.
1) to number, reckon
1a) (P'al) to number
1b) (Pael) to appoint
Adj — Verb · Piel · perfect third person masculine singularAVpp3ms
מֶ֫לֶךְ (melek) means 'king' in Hebrew and is also noted in Aramaic. The entries confirm its singular meaning related to royalty, with no significant disagreement among the lexicons.
מֶ֫לֶךְ 178 n.m. king
base
H4430 מֶ֫לֶךְ
4430 melek meh'-lek
(Aramaic) corresponding to 4428; a king:--king, royal.
see HEBREW for 04428
מֶ֫לֶךְ (me.lekh) — king.
king
Aramaic of me.lekh (מֶ֫לֶךְ "king" H4428)
§ 1) king
Adj | Art — Noun common both singular determined · particleANcbsd/Ta
King
Is in Scripture very generally used to denote one invested with authority, whether extensive or limited. There were thirty-one kings in Canaan (Josh. 12:9, 24), whom Joshua subdued. Adonibezek subdued seventy kings (Judg. 1:7). In the New Testament the Roman emperor is spoken of as a king (1 Pet. 2:13, 17); and Herod Antipas, who was only a tetrarch, is also called a king (Matt. 14:9; Mark 6:22).
This title is applied to God (1 Tim. 1:17), and to Christ, the Son of God (1 Tim. 6:15, 16;
"a chief ruler, one invested with supreme authority over a nation, tribe or country." --Webster. In the Bible the word does not necessarily imply great power or great extent of country. Many persons are called kings whom we should rather call chiefs or leaders. The word is applied in the Bible to God as the sovereign and ruler of the universe, and to Christ the Son of God as the head and governor of the Church. The Hebrews were ruled by a king during a period of about 500 years previous to the destruction of Jerusalem, B.C. 586. The immediate occasion of the substitution of a regal form of government for that of judges seems to have been the siege of Jabesh-gilead by Nahash king of the Ammonites. (1 Samuel 11:1; 12:12) The conviction seems to have forced itself on the Israelites that they could not resist their formidable neighbor…
אֲבַד (abad) primarily means to perish or be destroyed. It can denote various forms of destruction, including the act of perishing (P'al), the act of destroying (Aphel), and the state of being destroyed (Hophal). The word is used in contexts that imply loss or annihilation.
[אֲבַד] vb. perish
Pe. they shall perish, pass away.
Haph. destroy
Hoph. be destroyed
base
H7 [אֲבַד] perish
7 'abad ab-ad'
(Aramaic) corresponding to 6:--destroy, perish.
see HEBREW for 06
אֲבַד (a.vad) — to destroy.
1) to perish, vanish
1a) (P'al) shall perish
1b) (Aphel) destroy
1c) (Hophal) be destroyed
Adj | V-Hiphil-Inf-a — Preposition · verb hiphil infinitive construct commonAR/Vhcc
חַכִּים (chakkiym) means 'wise' and refers to a wise man or a Magian. It is derived from a root associated with wisdom, specifically noted in Strong's H2449. The term appears in contexts that emphasize wisdom.
[חַכִּים] 14 n.m. wise man
base
H2445 חַכִּים
2445 chakkiym khak-keem'
(Aramaic) from a root corresponding to 2449; wise, i.e. a
Magian:--wise.
see HEBREW for 02449
חַכִּים (chak.kim) — wise.
wise man, wise
Adj | N-mp — PrepositionAR/Aampc
ov:
(1) In Anglo-Saxon, had the meaning "from," "away from" (as the strengthened form "off" has still), and was not used for genitive or possessive relations, these being expressed by special case-forms. In the Norman period, however, "of" was taken to represent the French de (a use well developed by the time of Chaucer), and in the Elizabethan period both senses of "of" were in common use. But after about 1600 the later force of the word became predominant, and in the earlier sense (which is now practically obsolete) it was replaced by other prepositions. In consequence the King James Version (and in some cases the Revised Version (British and American)) contains many uses of "of" that are no longer familiar--most of them, to be sure, causing no difficulty, but there still being a few responsible for real obscurities.
OF, preposition ov. [Gr.]
1. From or out of; proceeding from, as the cause, source, means, author or agent bestowing.
I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered to you. 1 Corinthians 11:1.
For it was of the Lord to harden their hearts. Joshua 11:1.
It is of the Lord's mercies that we are not consumed.
Lamentations 3:1.
The whole disposing thereof is of the Lord. Proverbs 16:1.
Go, inquire of the Lord for me. 2 Chronicles 34:2.
That holy thing that shall be born of thee. Luke 1:1.
Hence of is the sign of the genitive case, the case that denotes production; as the son of man, the son proceeding from man, produced from man. This is the primary sense, although we now say, produced by man. 'Part of these were slain; ' that is, a number separate, for part denotes a division; the sense then is, a number from or out of the whole were slain. So also, 'some of these were slain; ' that is…
בָּבֶל (Babel) refers to Babylon, an ancient city associated with confusion due to mixing. The word is derived from Aramaic and is linked to Strong's H894. It is noted as the capital of Babylonia, located on the Euphrates River.
בָּבֶל n.pr.loc. Babylon
base
H895 בָּבֶל, בַּבֶל
895 Babel baw-bel'
(Aramaic) corresponding to 894:--Babylon.
see HEBREW for 0894
בָּבֶ֫ל, בָּבֶל (ba.vel) — Babylon.
Aramaic of ba.vel (בָּבֶ֫ל, בָּבֶל "Babylon" H0894)
§ Babel or Babylon = "confusion (by mixing)"
Babel or Babylon, the ancient site and/or capital of Babylonia (modern Hillah) situated on the Euphrates
Adj — Noun properANpl
Babylon
The Greek form of BABEL; Semitic form Babilu, meaning “The Gate of God.” In the Assyrian tablets it means “The city of the dispersion of the tribes.” The monumental list of its kings reaches back to B.C. 2300, and includes Khammurabi, or Amraphel (q.v.), the contemporary of Abraham. It stood on the Euphrates, about 200 miles above its junction with the Tigris, which flowed through its midst and divided it into two almost equal parts. The Elamites invaded Chaldea (i.e., Lower Mesopotamia, or Shinar, and Upper Mesopotamia, or Accad, now combined into one) and held it in subjection. At length Khammu-rabi delivered it from the foreign yoke, and founded the new empire of Chaldea (q.v.), making Babylon the capital of the united kingdom. This city gradually grew in extent and grandeur, but in process of time it became subject to Assyria. On the fall of Nineveh (B.C. 606) it threw off…
in the Apocalypse, is the symbolical name by which Rome is denoted. (Revelation 14:8; 17:18) The power of Rome was regarded by the later Jews as was that of Babylon by their forefathers. Comp. (Jeremiah 51:7) with Reve 14:8 The occurrence of this name in (1 Peter 5:13) has given rise to a variety of conjectures, many giving it the same meaning as in the Apocalypse; others refer it to Babylon in Asia, and others still to Babylon in Egypt. The most natural supposition of all is that by Babylon is intended the old Babylon of Assyria, which was largely inhabited by Jews at the time in question.
1. A celebrated city situated on the Euphrates, the original foundation of which is described under the word Babel. Wit this coincide many ancient traditions, while some speak of Semiramis as the founder, and others of Nebuchadnezzar. These accounts may all be reconciled, by supposing that Semiramis rebuilt the ancient city, and the Nebuchadnezzar. These accounts may all be reconciled, by supposing that Semiramis rebuilt the ancient city, and that Nebuchadnezzar afterwards greatly enlarged and adorned it.
Babylon lay in a vast and fertile plain watered by the Euphrates, with flowed through the city. Its walls are described as 60 miles in circumference, 300 feet high, and 75 feet wide, Jer 51:44- 58. A deep trench ran parallel with the walls. In each of the four sides were 25 brazen gates, from which roads crossed to the opposite…
same as Babel
אֲזַל (azal) is a Hebrew verb meaning 'to go' or 'to depart.' It is noted in various lexicons as a term for movement, specifically in the P'al form, indicating a simple action of going or going off.
אֲזַל vb. go, go off
base
H236 אֲזַל
236 'azal az-al'
(Aramaic) the same as 235; to depart:--go (up).
see HEBREW for 0235
אֲזַל (a.zal) — to go.
1) to go, to go off
1a) (P'al) to go, go off
AVqp3ms — Verb · Qal · perfect third person masculine singularAVqp3ms
כֵּן (ken) is an adverb meaning 'thus' or 'so.' It is derived from an Aramaic root and is used to indicate a manner or way of doing something. The entries consistently define it in this way, with no significant disagreement among the lexicons.
כֵּן adv. thus, as follows
base
H3652 כֵּן
3652 ken kane
(Aramaic) corresponding to 3651; so:--thus.
see HEBREW for 03651
כֵּן (ken) — thus.
thus, so, as follows
Aramaic of ken (כֵּן "so" H3651C)
AC/D — Conjunction · adverbAC/D
אֲמַר (amar) means to say, tell, command, or speak. It is used in various contexts to express communication or declaration. The word is related to the Aramaic form and is linked to another Hebrew root, אָמַר (H0559). The entries consistently emphasize its verbal nature without significant disagreement.
אֲמַר 71 vb. say, tell, command
base
H560 אֲמַר say, tell, command
560 'amar am-ar'
(Aramaic) corresponding to 559:--command, declare, say,
speak, tell.
see HEBREW for 0559
אֲמַר (a.mar) — to say.
(P'al) to say, to speak, to command, to tell, to relate
Aramaic of a.mar (אָמַר "to say" H0559)
Adj — Verb · Qal · perfect third person masculine singularAVqp3ms
וֹ (o) — him.
Personal object pronoun - suffix for propositions and verbs without an object: 3rd person masculine singular
AR/Sp3ms — Preposition · suffixAR/Sp3ms
חַכִּים (chakkiym) means 'wise' and refers to a wise man or a Magian. It is derived from a root associated with wisdom, specifically noted in Strong's H2449. The term appears in contexts that emphasize wisdom.
[חַכִּים] 14 n.m. wise man
base
H2445 חַכִּים
2445 chakkiym khak-keem'
(Aramaic) from a root corresponding to 2449; wise, i.e. a
Magian:--wise.
see HEBREW for 02449
חַכִּים (chak.kim) — wise.
wise man, wise
Adj | N-mp — PrepositionAR/Aampc
ov:
(1) In Anglo-Saxon, had the meaning "from," "away from" (as the strengthened form "off" has still), and was not used for genitive or possessive relations, these being expressed by special case-forms. In the Norman period, however, "of" was taken to represent the French de (a use well developed by the time of Chaucer), and in the Elizabethan period both senses of "of" were in common use. But after about 1600 the later force of the word became predominant, and in the earlier sense (which is now practically obsolete) it was replaced by other prepositions. In consequence the King James Version (and in some cases the Revised Version (British and American)) contains many uses of "of" that are no longer familiar--most of them, to be sure, causing no difficulty, but there still being a few responsible for real obscurities.
OF, preposition ov. [Gr.]
1. From or out of; proceeding from, as the cause, source, means, author or agent bestowing.
I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered to you. 1 Corinthians 11:1.
For it was of the Lord to harden their hearts. Joshua 11:1.
It is of the Lord's mercies that we are not consumed.
Lamentations 3:1.
The whole disposing thereof is of the Lord. Proverbs 16:1.
Go, inquire of the Lord for me. 2 Chronicles 34:2.
That holy thing that shall be born of thee. Luke 1:1.
Hence of is the sign of the genitive case, the case that denotes production; as the son of man, the son proceeding from man, produced from man. This is the primary sense, although we now say, produced by man. 'Part of these were slain; ' that is, a number separate, for part denotes a division; the sense then is, a number from or out of the whole were slain. So also, 'some of these were slain; ' that is…
בָּבֶל (Babel) refers to Babylon, an ancient city associated with confusion due to mixing. The word is derived from Aramaic and is linked to Strong's H894. It is noted as the capital of Babylonia, located on the Euphrates River.
בָּבֶל n.pr.loc. Babylon
base
H895 בָּבֶל, בַּבֶל
895 Babel baw-bel'
(Aramaic) corresponding to 894:--Babylon.
see HEBREW for 0894
בָּבֶ֫ל, בָּבֶל (ba.vel) — Babylon.
Aramaic of ba.vel (בָּבֶ֫ל, בָּבֶל "Babylon" H0894)
§ Babel or Babylon = "confusion (by mixing)"
Babel or Babylon, the ancient site and/or capital of Babylonia (modern Hillah) situated on the Euphrates
Adj — Noun properANpl
Babylon
The Greek form of BABEL; Semitic form Babilu, meaning “The Gate of God.” In the Assyrian tablets it means “The city of the dispersion of the tribes.” The monumental list of its kings reaches back to B.C. 2300, and includes Khammurabi, or Amraphel (q.v.), the contemporary of Abraham. It stood on the Euphrates, about 200 miles above its junction with the Tigris, which flowed through its midst and divided it into two almost equal parts. The Elamites invaded Chaldea (i.e., Lower Mesopotamia, or Shinar, and Upper Mesopotamia, or Accad, now combined into one) and held it in subjection. At length Khammu-rabi delivered it from the foreign yoke, and founded the new empire of Chaldea (q.v.), making Babylon the capital of the united kingdom. This city gradually grew in extent and grandeur, but in process of time it became subject to Assyria. On the fall of Nineveh (B.C. 606) it threw off…
in the Apocalypse, is the symbolical name by which Rome is denoted. (Revelation 14:8; 17:18) The power of Rome was regarded by the later Jews as was that of Babylon by their forefathers. Comp. (Jeremiah 51:7) with Reve 14:8 The occurrence of this name in (1 Peter 5:13) has given rise to a variety of conjectures, many giving it the same meaning as in the Apocalypse; others refer it to Babylon in Asia, and others still to Babylon in Egypt. The most natural supposition of all is that by Babylon is intended the old Babylon of Assyria, which was largely inhabited by Jews at the time in question.
1. A celebrated city situated on the Euphrates, the original foundation of which is described under the word Babel. Wit this coincide many ancient traditions, while some speak of Semiramis as the founder, and others of Nebuchadnezzar. These accounts may all be reconciled, by supposing that Semiramis rebuilt the ancient city, and the Nebuchadnezzar. These accounts may all be reconciled, by supposing that Semiramis rebuilt the ancient city, and that Nebuchadnezzar afterwards greatly enlarged and adorned it.
Babylon lay in a vast and fertile plain watered by the Euphrates, with flowed through the city. Its walls are described as 60 miles in circumference, 300 feet high, and 75 feet wide, Jer 51:44- 58. A deep trench ran parallel with the walls. In each of the four sides were 25 brazen gates, from which roads crossed to the opposite…
same as Babel
אַל (al) is an adverb of prohibition meaning 'not' or 'do not.' It corresponds to the Hebrew word לא (lo, H0408) and is used to express negation in various contexts. The entries indicate its usage primarily in prohibitive statements.
אַל adv. of prohibition, do not …, let not …
base
H409 אַל
409 'al al
(Aramaic) corresponding to 408:--not.
see HEBREW for 0408
אַל (al) — not.
no, not
Aramaic of al (אַל "not" H0408)
Adj — ParticleATn
אֲבַד (abad) primarily means to perish or be destroyed. It can denote various forms of destruction, including the act of perishing (P'al), the act of destroying (Aphel), and the state of being destroyed (Hophal). The word is used in contexts that imply loss or annihilation.
[אֲבַד] vb. perish
Pe. they shall perish, pass away.
Haph. destroy
Hoph. be destroyed
base
H7 [אֲבַד] perish
7 'abad ab-ad'
(Aramaic) corresponding to 6:--destroy, perish.
see HEBREW for 06
אֲבַד (a.vad) — to destroy.
1) to perish, vanish
1a) (P'al) shall perish
1b) (Aphel) destroy
1c) (Hophal) be destroyed
Adj — Verb · Hiphil · imperfect third person feminine singularAVhi3fs
עֲלַל (alal) is a Hebrew verb meaning to come in or go in, with various forms indicating different nuances such as thrusting oneself in or introducing. It appears in both active and passive forms, including to bring in and to be brought in. The entries suggest a focus on the act of entering or introducing something.
[עֲלַל] vb. go or come in
Pe.
Haph. bring in
Hoph. be brought
base
H5954 עֲלַל
5954 `alal al-al'
(Aramaic) corresponding to 5953 (in the sense of thrusting
oneself in), to enter; causatively, to introduce:--bring in,
come in, go in.
see HEBREW for 05953
עֲלַל (a.lal) — to come.
1) to thrust in, go in, come in
1a) (P'al) to go in, come in
1b) (Aphel) to bring in
1c) (Hophal) to be brought in
Adj | Suff — Verb hiphil imperative second person masculine singular · suffixAVhv2ms/Sp1bs
קֳדָם (qodam) primarily means 'before' or 'in front of.' It is used in various contexts, including indicating position or time. The entries indicate its Aramaic roots and its connection to another Hebrew word, קָדַם (H6924). Daniel 7:13 is specifically noted for its use.
[קֳדָם] 42 prep. before
base
H6925 קֳדָם, קְדָם
6925 qodam kod-awm'
(Aramaic) or qdam (Aramaic) (Daniel 7:l3) {ked-awm'};
corresponding to 6924; before:--before, X from, X I
(thought), X me, + of, X it pleased, presence.
see HEBREW for 0l3
see HEBREW for 06924
קֳדָם (qo.dam) — before.
1) before, in front of
1a) before
1b) from before
Adj — Noun common · both singular constructANcbsc
be-for': The translation of a great variety of Hebrew and Greek words. "Haran died before (the English Revised Version "in the presence of," literally "before the face of") his father Terah" (Ge 11:28). To be "before" God is to enjoy His favor (Ps 31:22). "The Syrians before" (Isa 9:12 the Revised Version, margin "on the east," as "behind," owing to the position of Canaan, relative to Syria, implies the west).
מֶ֫לֶךְ (melek) means 'king' in Hebrew and is also noted in Aramaic. The entries confirm its singular meaning related to royalty, with no significant disagreement among the lexicons.
מֶ֫לֶךְ 178 n.m. king
base
H4430 מֶ֫לֶךְ
4430 melek meh'-lek
(Aramaic) corresponding to 4428; a king:--king, royal.
see HEBREW for 04428
מֶ֫לֶךְ (me.lekh) — king.
king
Aramaic of me.lekh (מֶ֫לֶךְ "king" H4428)
§ 1) king
Adj | Art — Noun common both singular determined · particleANcbsd/Ta
King
Is in Scripture very generally used to denote one invested with authority, whether extensive or limited. There were thirty-one kings in Canaan (Josh. 12:9, 24), whom Joshua subdued. Adonibezek subdued seventy kings (Judg. 1:7). In the New Testament the Roman emperor is spoken of as a king (1 Pet. 2:13, 17); and Herod Antipas, who was only a tetrarch, is also called a king (Matt. 14:9; Mark 6:22).
This title is applied to God (1 Tim. 1:17), and to Christ, the Son of God (1 Tim. 6:15, 16;
"a chief ruler, one invested with supreme authority over a nation, tribe or country." --Webster. In the Bible the word does not necessarily imply great power or great extent of country. Many persons are called kings whom we should rather call chiefs or leaders. The word is applied in the Bible to God as the sovereign and ruler of the universe, and to Christ the Son of God as the head and governor of the Church. The Hebrews were ruled by a king during a period of about 500 years previous to the destruction of Jerusalem, B.C. 586. The immediate occasion of the substitution of a regal form of government for that of judges seems to have been the siege of Jabesh-gilead by Nahash king of the Ammonites. (1 Samuel 11:1; 12:12) The conviction seems to have forced itself on the Israelites that they could not resist their formidable neighbor…
פְּשַׁר (pshar) is an Aramaic noun meaning 'interpretation,' specifically referring to the interpretation of dreams. It is derived from a root that also relates to the concept of interpretation. The entries consistently emphasize its use in the context of dream interpretation.
פְּשַׁר 31 n.m. interpretation (of dream)
base
H6591 פְּשַׁר
6591 pshar pesh-ar'
(Aramaic) from 6590; an interpretation:--interpretation.
see HEBREW for 06590
פְּשַׁר (pe.shar) — interpretation.
interpretation (of dream)
Aramaic of pit.ron (פִּתְרוֹן "interpretation" H6623)
Adj | N-ms | Art — Conjunction · noun common both singular determined · particleAC/Ncbsd/Ta
in-tur-pre-ta'-shun:
1. General Principles:
Is a generic term and may refer to any work of literature. Referred specifically to the sacred Scriptures, the science of interpretation is generally known as hermeneutics, while the practical application of the principles of this science is exegesis. In nearly all cases, interpretation has in mind the thoughts of another, and then, further, these thoughts expressed in another language than that of the interpreter. In this sense it is used in Biblical research. A person has interpreted the thoughts of another when he has in his own mind a correct reproduction or photograph of the thought as it was conceived in the mind of the original writer or speaker. It is accordingly a purely reproductive process, involving no originality of thought on the part of the interpreter. If the latter adds anything of his own it is eisegesis and not exegesis. The…
Revealing the true meaning of supernatural dreams, Ge 41:1-57 Da 2:4, unknown tongues, etc., 1Co 12:12,30 14:5,13.
For the right interpretation of the word of God, the chief requisites are, a renewed heart, supremely desirous to learn and do the will of God; the aid of the Holy Spirit, sought and gained; a firm conviction that the word of God should rule the erring season and heart of man; a diligent comparison of its different parts, for the light they throw upon each other; all reliable information as to the history and geography, the customs, laws, and languages, the public, domestic, and inner life of Bible times. Thus to study the Bible for one’s self is the privilege and duty of every one.
→ See TONGUES
מֶ֫לֶךְ (melek) means 'king' in Hebrew and is also noted in Aramaic. The entries confirm its singular meaning related to royalty, with no significant disagreement among the lexicons.
מֶ֫לֶךְ 178 n.m. king
base
H4430 מֶ֫לֶךְ
4430 melek meh'-lek
(Aramaic) corresponding to 4428; a king:--king, royal.
see HEBREW for 04428
מֶ֫לֶךְ (me.lekh) — king.
king
Aramaic of me.lekh (מֶ֫לֶךְ "king" H4428)
§ 1) king
Adj | N-ms | Art — Preposition · noun common both singular determined · particleAR/Ncbsd/Ta
King
Is in Scripture very generally used to denote one invested with authority, whether extensive or limited. There were thirty-one kings in Canaan (Josh. 12:9, 24), whom Joshua subdued. Adonibezek subdued seventy kings (Judg. 1:7). In the New Testament the Roman emperor is spoken of as a king (1 Pet. 2:13, 17); and Herod Antipas, who was only a tetrarch, is also called a king (Matt. 14:9; Mark 6:22).
This title is applied to God (1 Tim. 1:17), and to Christ, the Son of God (1 Tim. 6:15, 16;
"a chief ruler, one invested with supreme authority over a nation, tribe or country." --Webster. In the Bible the word does not necessarily imply great power or great extent of country. Many persons are called kings whom we should rather call chiefs or leaders. The word is applied in the Bible to God as the sovereign and ruler of the universe, and to Christ the Son of God as the head and governor of the Church. The Hebrews were ruled by a king during a period of about 500 years previous to the destruction of Jerusalem, B.C. 586. The immediate occasion of the substitution of a regal form of government for that of judges seems to have been the siege of Jabesh-gilead by Nahash king of the Ammonites. (1 Samuel 11:1; 12:12) The conviction seems to have forced itself on the Israelites that they could not resist their formidable neighbor…
חֲוָה (chava') is a verb meaning 'to show' or 'to declare.' It has forms in both the Pael and Aphel stems, indicating actions like interpreting or informing. The term appears in Aramaic and corresponds to another Hebrew root, חָוָה (H2331), which also relates to the concept of showing.
[חֲוָה] vb. Pa. Haph. declare
base
H2324 חֲוָה, חֲוָא
2324 chava' khav-aw'
(Aramaic) corresponding to 2331; to show:--shew.
see HEBREW for 02331
חֲוָה (cha.vah) — to show.
1) to show, interpret, explain, inform, tell, declare
1a) (Pael) to show, interpret
1b) (Aphel) to show
Adj — Verb · Piel · imperfect first person common singularAVpi1cs