SermonIndex Audio Sermons
SermonIndex - Promoting Revival to this Generation
Give To SermonIndex
Discussion Forum : Scriptures and Doctrine : Marriage, Divorce, and ReMarriage.. Toward a Biblical Perspective

Print Thread (PDF)

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 Next Page )
PosterThread
Sealed
Member



Joined: 2006/5/13
Posts: 22
Milwaukee WI

 Re:

Quote:
I think you misread your quote of me. I said

'Do you think that just because he or she is not an adulterer, God will not judge every other sin by whether they have been washed in the blood of the Lamb, now?'

I did not suggest there is licence for adultery. I suggested there is NOT licence for making an unfaithful spouse's life a misery (and other sins).



Sorry, my mistake. I agree that we should forgive even our enemies, much less our own flesh.

Sealed

 2006/5/13 19:00Profile









 Re:

Quote:



That's not what the text says at all. Jesus and the Pharisees both agree in these verses that it is the Moseic Law being discussed here. I explained in detail how these verses fit perfectly with the law. Your interpretation is contradictory to the Jewish law, and also is an obvious contradiction to similar statements made by Jesus in other Gospels, as well as several statements by Paul. You are tearing these verses out of context and contradicting much of the Bible in regard to marriage.

Sealed



Thats right, they WERE discussing Mosiac law and what he had permitted, for EVERY cause divorce.

then AFTER Jesus is finished explaining He makes an EXCEPTION that shows NO adultery is committed upon marrying another IF the exceptoin applies.

come on SE, this isnt that hard.

 2006/5/13 19:12









 Re:

Quote:

He divorced Israel for spiritual immorality during the betrothal, which is why He made Deut 22 & 24 to begin with. Jesus says the Law of divorce was given due to the hardness of their hearts. Since they refused to soften their hearts to God, he made a New Covenant with the Church where he regenerates our hearts so that we desire to be faithful to Him.

Sealed


It is irrelevant that you say He divorced her during betrothal.
YOU have yourself admitted that betrothal is LAWFULLY MARRIED and as such a LAWFUL wife is being put away.

NOTHING EVER states that this exception ONLY applies to betrothal....YOU add that.

And i believe we've proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that this 'fornication' (porneia) Jesus speaks of is NOT applicable to Jews and their marital customs alone...

exhibit A...

Quote:


Fornication (porneia g4202) cannot mean illicit sexual activity only 'during Jewish betrothal" as some try to state.

The word porneia (rendered 'fornication) is directed SPECIFICALLY to GENTILE converts in Acts 15 to tell them to abstain from 'fornication' (porneia G4202).

===========================================================================
"Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God: But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.
(Act 15:19-20)

fornication
G4202
????????
porneia
por-ni'-ah
From G4203; harlotry (including adultery and incest); figuratively idolatry: - fornication.

======================================================


Since betrothal is a Jewish custom, using this word 'porneia' to instruct the gentiles means that porneia cannot in any way specifically mean, and limited to, sexual sin during the JEWISH betrothal period.

So we can know with absolute confidence that when our Lord says 'except for fornication' pertaining to divorce, that adultery is not committed upon REmarriage in such cases, that His exception applies to His followers, ALL of them, not just Jews....this is the truth that scripture as a whole provides.
http://www.geocities.com/divorceandremarriage/fornicationnotonlyduringbetrothal.html




YOU are the one who is making the claim that this 'fornication' ONLY applies to Jews....and we see that this idea is errant entirely.

Not to mention that Id bet MOST of the folks who read this thread will see the terrible contradictions Ive pointed out to you, seeing that Im no theologian and most folks are probably smarter than I am.

 2006/5/13 19:18









 Re:

Did Jesus say ''wife'' or "espoused" wife

In His exception clause, Jesus is clearly refering to a lawful wife. If Jesus had been only refering to the betrothal period in the exception clause, He would have used the very term used for Mary at times...."espoused wife'' or ''espoused'' (see G3423) in His exception clause.
*IF* He were restricting His exception to the betrothal period, there is no reason to believe that our Lord would have been so vague about it.
The fact is NOTHING presented in scripture backs this silly assertion by some who say that Jesus only meant to except the betrothed wife.
This is all deceptive propaganda created to further a false doctrine... this idea does not come from Gods word.

Jesus clearly used the word that means ''wife'' or woman. A mans woman was his wife. She was his lawful wife from the moment the marriage was contracted. The betrothed wife was a lawful wife.
Jesus being a Jew and being God, knew this.
When He said ''wife'' He was refering to whoredom of a wife, pre or post consummation.
(compare Matt 19.9 and 5:32 with Luke 2:5)

Conclusion:
Jesus could have said "espoused' or 'betrothed' ("mne?steuo?" as is used for Mary) in His exception, yet He chose to use the normal word for a 'wife'(gune?) in Matthew 19.
If Jesus WAS discerning one OVER the other, His ACTUAL words would be pertaining to the consummated wife and not the betrothed at all.

But seeing that the betrothed wife was lawfully contracted in marriage, she was just as much a 'wife' for legal and religious reasons as the consummated wife.

http://www.geocities.com/divorceandremarriage/13.html

 2006/5/13 19:26









 Re:

Quote:

Sealed wrote:

He divorced Israel for spiritual immorality during the betrothal, which is why He made Deut 22 & 24 to begin with.


Now, since when do you get to decide what the motivations were pertaining to Deut 22 and 24?

Deut 22 is clearly about the sexual sins of the wife...betrothed and consummated are both covered.
Deut 24 says nothing of the sort and is your doctrinal downfall.

As i said, Deut was given over approx 40 days from my understanding.
So you are saying that God gave law for the sexual sins of a wife on one day, then less than a month later, most likely no more than a week, He decides, 'hey wait, scratch that Moses, I change my mind".....and AMENDS Deut 22... BUT ONLY for the husband.
ANYONE else who finds this wife a cheating is still permitted to have her brutally killed as per Deut 22:23-24.

This is a bit hard for us to swallow SE.

[b]Fact[/b]: The pharisees speaking to Jesus understood Deut 24:1-4 to be 'for EVERY cause' divorce.
[b]Fact[/b]: Jesus never corrected this interpretation as He had done with them on occasion telling them they 'err'pertianing to their FALSE understanding
(they did slip in their own twist by making it a 'command' rather than a permission)
[b]Logical conclusion:[/b]this "hardhearted" divorce being spoken of isnt concerning putting away for her not being found a virgin, but 'for EVERY cause" just as Gods word CLEARLY states.

This conclusion is backed by Gods word and very clearly supported by the history of the Jews pertaining to marriage.


Quote:
Jesus says the Law of divorce was given due to the hardness of their hearts. Since they refused to soften their hearts to God,


That is correct.
The Jews had tormented their wives, even killing them if able so Moses permitted EASY (for EVERY cause) divorce.
The Jews then distorted THAT permission into a 'commandment' to divorce upon every trifling occasion.

as you said, Jesus is speaking to JEWS in THEIR context.

THEIR context pertaining to marriage and putting away was the above....hardhearted to the core.
That is the hardheartedness that caused that covenant (Mosiac economy) with a whoring spouse to be put away.

Jesus then adds 'EXCEPT for fornication"....ONLY if she has BROKEN the covenant can you put her away and remarry and not commit adulter against her upon remarriage.

Quote:

he made a New Covenant with the Church where he regenerates our hearts so that we desire to be faithful to Him.

Sealed


Thats right.
Our God is Himself a divorcee...having put away a covenant with Israel over ongoing whoredoms and idolotries.

He knows exactly the pain caused by a hardhearted spouse...which is why Jesus' own exceptoin harmonizes PERFECTLY with the whole of Gods word...

 2006/5/13 20:28









 Re: Marriage, Divorce, and ReMarriage.. Toward a Biblical Perspective


I have edited my long post on p6, in the second half, clearly marked, not saying anything new but rewording quite a few sentences, in the hope of the content being clearer.

Please let me know if this is not so. Thanks. :-}


Hi Sealed,

I do intend to read the rest of your post and decide whether to reply.

 2006/5/17 10:20









 Re:

Quote:

Hi Sealed,

I do intend to read the rest of your post and decide whether to reply.


Depending on whether it is mr or mrs sealed you may or may not get any more response.
Sometimes she begins a conversation and then he comes in at a later point.
That is how I found out there were two of them.

 2006/5/18 11:11









 Re: Marriage, Divorce, and ReMarriage.. Toward a Biblical Perspective


Hi FOC,

If you have not read the edited part of my post on p6, please do, since you revived this thread. I've found it helpful to express some of my recently-found clarity on these matters, so I'd be interested if you have any comments.

Quote:
you may or may not get any more response.

As long as the discussion is a genuine attempt to understand biblical morality, with the intention of encouraging its practice in 3D, the exercise is useful - whoever responds.

 2006/5/18 18:23
lastblast
Member



Joined: 2004/10/16
Posts: 528
Michigan

 Re:

Quote:
divorce and remarriage is NOT adultery, unless the divorced person - that is, not the Plaintif but the Respondent - remarries. Then both he or she and his or her spouse are committing adultery, because, the person who committed adultery first, when they were still married to their first spouse, is the person who should remain unmarried as a punishment for their sin



Dorcas, that is not what Jesus spoke. How do you fit that reasoning in with Paul's teaching that it is not due to punishment that a woman is prohibited from remarrying, but because the BOND of marriage to a first husband remains intact until that husband dies? (Rom. 7:2-3, I Cor. 7:39) I think in order to say that one is "free" to marry again, they have to show biblical evidence that the marriage bond is dissolved in the eyes of God........and if that be the case, then ALL parties would be free to remarry. "Punishing" a person and yet saying a person is a partaker of God's Grace and forgiveness is completely at odds---at least to my thinking on what true Grace and forgiveness is.

Quote:
ONLY if there is GENUINE repentance and a change of course by the one who broke the marriage covenant, is there the slightest glimmer of hope for a meaningful reconciliation, but, even that cannot be at the beck and call of others. Broken hearts take time to mend.



Exactly, yet what you would say is OK with the Lord(remarrying another while one has a living spouse) flies in the face of what you just spoke above. To remarry says that I WILL NOT allow healing to occur with the possibility of RECONCILIATION with the one God joined me to----the offense is just too great and I am not willing to wait until they come to full repentance. I would ask this: is THIS the mind/heart of Jesus Christ toward the sinner? Does He wash His hands of us BEFORE the day of judgment?

We want to demand time to HEAL from hurts, bitterness, anger, etc (some of which are very sinful things to deal with), but concerning the "sinful" one, we don't want to allow time for repentance---full and genuine, to take place. We want to get on with life. If we grab hold of this mindset, are we walking in the light---as HE is in the light?

One more thing to ponder: What better person than one who is called by His name, to stand in the gap(intercede) for the one HE joined them to when they sin (whatever that sin may)? Is that not a reflection of Christ towards His Body? Blessings in Him, Cindy :-)


_________________
Cindy

 2006/5/18 20:30Profile









 Re:

Quote:
lastblast:
(Rom. 7:2-3, I Cor. 7:39)


http://www.geocities.com/divorceandremarriage/6.html


Quote:
Exactly, yet what you would say is OK with the Lord(remarrying another while one has a living spouse) flies in the face of what you just spoke above. To remarry says that I WILL NOT allow healing to occur with the possibility of RECONCILIATION with the one God joined me to----the offense is just too great and I am not willing to wait until they come to full repentance. I would ask this: is THIS the mind/heart of Jesus Christ toward the sinner? Does He wash His hands of us BEFORE the day of judgment?



What exposes your false doctrine is that you allow for this very thing when it is a betrothed WIFE (which is a lawful WIFE indeed), then disallow it when it is a consummated wife. Scripture does not make this distinction...YOU do.

Your false doctrine ALLOWS this supposed hardheartedness (divorce for whoredom ?) to be given to a betrothed WIFE, then rejects it only because she is consummated.

Whats hilarious is NOTHING in scripture makes this distinction...and *IF* it does, I challenge you PERSONALLY to present it !

None of the wording, greek nor english, backs your assertion.
Your "evidence" has been exposed as not backing a single thing either for or against your argument (hosea/gomer,herod/herodias,Joseph/Mary, etc)

http://www.geocities.com/divorceandremarriage/18.html
http://www.geocities.com/divorceandremarriage/19.html
http://www.geocities.com/divorceandremarriage/8.html


You folks permit hardheartedness against a wife just as quickly as you claim that we do....you simply alter the details to try to disguise this fact.

And by your actions and words, your doctrine permits a far more heinous crime against women in general by forcing them to be forever bound to an animal who even beats and rapes not only them, but even their own daughters.


This doctrine has completely missed firstly what Moses did by allowing frivolous (for EVERY cause) divorce, and then again missed what Jesus was doing in restricting it again.

Ive pointed this out to you all about 1000 times now...when you figure out that BOTH were "protecting" the INNOCENT spouse, hopefully some enlightenment will occur.

 2006/5/18 22:58





©2002-2024 SermonIndex.net
Promoting Revival to this Generation.
Privacy Policy