ἀπαρτί (so Tdf. in John, T and Tr in Rev.), or rather ἀπ' ἄρτι (cf. Winers Grammar, § 5, 2, p. 45, and 422 (393); (Buttmann, 320 (275); Lipsius, p. 127); see ἄρτι, adverb, from now, henceforth: Mat_23:39; Mat_26:29; Mat_26:64 (in Luk_22:69 ἀπό τοῦ νῦν); Joh_1:51 () Rec.; ; Rev_14:13 (where connect ἀπ' ἄρτι with μακάριοι). In the Greek of the O. T. it is not found (for the the Sept. render ξΕςΗϊΘΜδ by ἀπό τοῦ νῦν), and scarcely (yet Liddell and Scott cite Aristophanes Pl. 388; Plato, commentary, Sof. 10) in the earlier and more elegant Greek writings. For the similar term which the classic writers employ is to be written as one word, and oxytone (viz. ἀπαρτί), and has a different meaning (viz., completely, exactly); cf. Knapp, Scripta var. Arg. i., p. 296; Lob. ad Phryn., p. 20f.

not given

* ἀπάρτι ( WH , ἀπ᾽ ἄρτι ; cl ., ἀπαρτί ,, ν . MM , VGT , s.v. ); adv. , [not in LXX , where H6258 is rendered by ἀπὸ τοῦ νῦν ;] from now, henceforth: Joh_13:19 ; Joh_14:7 , Rev_14:13 .†

ἀπαρτί [page 53] ἀπαρτί is to be written as two words, the combination matching such familiar Hellenistic locutions as ἕως ἄρτι , ἐκ πότε , ἀπὸ πέρυσι , etc. The two Attic quotations which Thayer takes over from LS are denied by Lobeck Phryn. p. 21, who takes ἀπαρτί by preference in the extant passage : Rutherford NP p. 71 agrees with him. Ἀπαρτί = exactly in Ionic, and (by irony) quite the contrary in Attic (Rutherford) : it has a totally different history from ἀπ᾽ ἄρτι . On the practice of the critical editors, see Nestle Einf. in aas Gr. NT .3 , p. 27.

ἀπάρτι (WH, ἀπ᾽ ἄρτι; cl., ἀπαρτί, ν. MM, VGT, see word); adv., [not in LXX, where עַתָּה is rendered by ἀπὸ τοῦ νῦν ;] from now, henceforth: Jhn.13:19 14:7, Rev.14:13.† (AS)