δευτερόπρωτος, δευτερόπρωτον, second-first (cf. δευτερεσχατος second-last, last but one): ἐν σαββάτῳ δευτεροπρώτῳ in Luk_6:1 seems to be, the second of the first sabbaths after the feast of the Passover; cf. Redslob in the Intelligenzblatt zur Hall. Lit. Zeit. 1847, N. 70; Ewald, Jahrbb. d. Biblical Wissensch. i., p. 72; (WH's Appendix, at the passage). The various opinions of others are reviewed by Meyer (and McClellan) at the passage and Lübkert in the Studien und Kritiken for 1835, p. 664ff (Eustrat. in vita Eutych. n. 95 calls the first Sunday after Easter δευτεροπρωτην κυριακην). (But the genuineness of the word is questionable. It is lacking in ΰ B L 1, 33, 69 and some other authorities. Hence, Tr text WH omit the word; L Tr marginal reading brackets it. Tischendorf, after expunging it in his 2nd edition, restored it in his 7th edition, subsequently put it in brackets, and finally (8th edition) inserted it again. It is questioned or discarded, by Meyer, Bleek, Alford, Weiss (on Mark, p. 101), Holtz., Hilgenf., Volkm., Farrar (commentary at the passage and Life of Christ 1:435), others. For the evidence see Tdf.s note, and for discussions of it see WHs Appendix at the passage; Scrivener, Introduction, p. 515f; Green, Developed Criticism at the passage.)

not given

*† δευτερό -πρωτος , -ον , second first (in what sense, there is no satis\-factory explanation. The reading is prob. not original, v. ICC , in l ; DCG , i, 411; ii, 541, 724): Luk_6:1 , WH , mg ., R , mg .†

δευτερόπρωτος [page 143] It is almost superfluous to say that we have found no support for this famous vox nihili ( Luk_6:1 ), the only interest of which to-day is the curious problem of its early entrance into the text. (Note that W is now added to the MSS rejecting it.) Grimm s superficially parallel δευτερέσχ́ατος second last, last but one, is no help : first but one is δεύτερος simply. Δεκάπρωτος , one of ten πρῶτοι , is clearly not parallel. One of the most ingenious explanations is that of F. C. Burkitt ( Gosp. Hist. p. 81n.), that the βα of σαββάτῳ was repeated at the beginning of a new line, and then βατω expanded as δευτερο - πρώτῳ cf. ιβμήνου cited above under δεκαδύο .

δευτερό-πρωτος, -ον second first (in what sense, there is no satisfactory explanation. The reading is prob. not original, see ICC, in l.; DCG, i, 411; ii, 541, 724): Luk.6:1, WH, mg., R, mg.† (AS)