- Home
- Speakers
- John Wesley
- Self Denial (Reading)
Self Denial (Reading)
John Wesley

John Wesley (1703 - 1791). English Anglican clergyman, evangelist, and co-founder of Methodism, born in Epworth, Lincolnshire, to a rector’s family. Educated at Oxford, where he earned an M.A. in 1727, he was ordained in 1728 and led the Holy Club with brother Charles, emphasizing disciplined faith. After a failed mission to Georgia (1735-1737), he experienced a transformative conversion in 1738 at Aldersgate, London, feeling his “heart strangely warmed.” Wesley preached over 40,000 sermons, often outdoors, sparking the 18th-century Evangelical Revival, and traveled 250,000 miles on horseback across Britain and Ireland. He authored 400 works, including A Plain Account of Christian Perfection (1777), and edited The Christian’s Pattern. Founding Methodist societies, he trained 650 preachers and ordained ministers for America, influencing millions. Married to Mary Vazeille in 1751, their childless union strained, but his brother’s hymns enriched worship. A tireless advocate for the poor, he opened dispensaries and schools, and his 1787 sermon against slavery stirred abolitionism. Despite tensions with the Church of England, he never left it, shaping global Protestantism. His maxim, “Do all the good you can, by all the means you can, in all the ways you can, in all the places you can, at all the times you can, to all the people you can, as long as ever you can,” inspired generations to active faith. Wesley’s journals and letters, still widely read, reveal a legacy of practical holiness and social reform
Download
Topic
Sermon Summary
In this video, James Christian introduces the John Wesley Sermon series and encourages listeners to engage with classic Christian texts in audiobook form. He emphasizes the importance of practicing the teachings of the word of God daily and without interruption. The sermon focuses on the concept of self-denial, as Jesus instructs his disciples to deny themselves, take up their cross daily, and follow him. James Christian highlights the significance of applying this teaching to one's own life and seeking strength from God to practice it immediately and universally in all circumstances.
Sermon Transcription
In the 18th century, John and Charles Wesley began an evangelism ministry that changed the face of history. The majority of church leaders at the time were hypocrites to the extreme, and they did very little to promote holy living amongst the congregation. Most of the pulpits in the established church were off-limits to the brothers, so they began preaching in the fields. They reached out to the poor and spoke to people who had never even seen the inside of a church. John believed in the deity of Christ, miracles, and the supernatural. He fearlessly preached against the many sins of his time, especially drunkenness and gambling. He stressed holy living and sought to bring sinners to conversion. John Wesley's contribution to England, and to the entire world, is immeasurable. By the end of his life, much of the ignorance, coarseness, brutality, and drunkenness had disappeared from English living, and a new vitality came to the Christian church at large. This is James Christian, inviting you to listen to John Wesley's complete unabridged sermons for the benefit of your soul. May the Lord bless you, and use these as a means for prompting and continuing in holiness. Sermon 48 is entitled, Today's text is taken from the book of Luke. And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me. Luke 9.23 It has been frequently imagined that the direction here given related chiefly, if not wholly, to the apostles, at least to the Christians of the first ages, or those in a state of persecution. But this is a grievous mistake. For although our blessed Lord is here directing His discourse more immediately to His apostles, and those other disciples who attended Him in the days of His flesh, yet in them He speaks to us, and to all mankind, without any exception or limitation. The very reason of the thing puts it beyond dispute, that the duty which is here enjoined is not peculiar to them, or to the Christians of the early ages. It no more regards any particular order of men, or particular time, than any particular country. No, it is of the most universal nature, respecting all times and all persons, yea, and all things, not meats and drinks only, and things pertaining to the senses. The meaning is, if any man of whatever rank, station, circumstances, in any nation, in any age of the world, will effectually come after me, let him deny himself in all things, let him take up his cross of whatever kind, yea, and that daily, and follow me. The denying ourselves, and the taking up our cross, in the full extent of the expression, is not a thing of small concern. It is not expedient only, as are some of the circumstantials of religion, but it is absolutely, indispensably necessary, either to our becoming, or continuing His disciples. It is absolutely necessary, in the very nature of the thing, to our coming after Him, and following Him, insomuch that, as far as we do not practice it, we are not His disciples. If we do not continually deny ourselves, we do not learn of Him, but of other masters. If we do not take up our cross daily, we do not come after Him, but after the world, or the prince of the world, or our own fleshly mind. If we are not walking in the way of the cross, we are not following Him, we are not treading in His steps, but going back from, or at least wide of Him. It is for this reason, that so many ministers of Christ, in almost every age and nation, particularly since the reformation of the Church from the innovations and corruptions gradually crept into it, have wrote and spoke so largely on this important duty, both in their public discourses and private exhortations. This induced them to disperse abroad many tracts upon the subject, and some in our own nation. They knew both from the oracles of God, and from the testimony of their own experience, how impossible it was not to deny our Master, unless we will deny ourselves, and how vainly we attempt to follow Him that was crucified, unless we take up our cross daily. But may not this very consideration make it reasonable to inquire, if much has been said and wrote on the subject already, what need is there to say or write any more? I answer, there are no inconsiderable numbers, even of people fearing God, who have not had the opportunity either of hearing what has been spoke, or reading what has been wrote upon it. And perhaps, if they had read much of what had been written, they would not have been so much profited. Many who have wrote, some of them large volumes, do by no means appear to have understood the subject. Either they had imperfect views of the very nature of it, and then they could never explain it to others, or they were unacquainted with the due extent of it. They did not see how exceeding broad this command is, or they were not sensible of the absolute, the indispensable necessity of it. Others speak of it in so dark, so perplexed, so intricate, so mystical a manner, as if they designed rather to conceal it from the vulgar, than to explain it to the common readers. Others speak admirably well, with great clearness and strength on the necessity of self-denial. But then they deal in generals only, without coming to particular instances, and so are of little use to the bulk of mankind, to men of ordinary capacity and education. And, if some of them do descend to particulars, it is to those particulars only which do not affect the generality of men, since they seldom, if ever, occur in common life. Such as the enduring imprisonment or tortures, the giving up, in a literal sense, their houses or lands, their husbands or wives, children, or life itself, to none of which we are called, nor are likely to be, unless God should permit times of public persecution to return. In the meantime, I know of no writer in the English tongue who has described the nature of self-denial in plain and intelligible terms, such as lie level with common understanding, and applied it to those little particulars which daily occur in common life. A discourse of this kind is wanted still, and it is wanted the more because, in every stage of the spiritual life, although there is a variety of particular hindrances of our attaining grace or growing therein, yet are all resolvable unto these general ones. Either we do not deny ourselves, or we do not take up our cross. In order to supply this defect in some degree, I shall endeavor to show, first, what it is for a man to deny himself, and what to take up his cross, and, secondly, that, if a man be not fully Christ's disciple, it is always owing to the want of this. I shall, first, endeavor to show what it is for a man to deny himself and take up his cross daily. This is a point which is, of all others, most necessary to be considered and thoroughly understood, even on this account that it is, of all others, most opposed by numerous and powerful enemies. All our nature must certainly rise up against this, even in its own defense. The world, consequently, the men who take nature, not grace for their guide, abhor the very sound of it, and the great enemy of our souls, well knowing its importance, cannot but move every stone against it. But this is not all. Even those who have, in some measure, shaken off the yoke of the devil, who have experienced, especially of late years, a real work of grace in their hearts, yet are no friends to this grand doctrine of Christianity, though it is so peculiarly insisted upon by their master. Some of them are as deeply and totally ignorant concerning it as if there were not one word about it in the Bible. Others are farther off still, having unawares imbibed strong prejudices against it. These they have received partly from outside Christians, men of a fair speech and behavior, who want nothing of godliness but the power, nothing of religion but the spirit, and partly from those who did once, if they do not now, taste of the powers of the world to come. But are there any of these who do not both practice self-denial themselves and recommend it to others? You are little acquainted with mankind if you doubt of this. There are whole bodies of men who only do not declare war against it. To go no farther than London, look upon the whole body of predestinarians, who by the free mercy of God have lately been called out of the darkness of nature into the light of faith. Are they patterns of self-denial? How few of them even profess to practice it at all. How few of them recommend it themselves or are pleased with them that do. Rather, do they not continually represent it in the most odious colors, as if it were seeking salvation by works or seeking to establish our own righteousness? And how readily do antinomians of all kinds, from the smooth Moravian to the boisterous foul-mouthed ranter, join the cry with their silly, unmeaning cant of legality and preaching the law. Therefore, you are in constant danger of being wheedled, hectored, or ridiculed out of this important gospel doctrine, either by false teachers or false brethren, more or less beguiled from the simplicity of the gospel, if you are not deeply grounded therein. Let fervent prayer, then, go before, accompany, and follow what you are now about to hear, that it may be written in your heart by the finger of God, so as never to be erased. But what is self-denial? Wherein are we to deny ourselves? And whence does the necessity of this arise? I answer, the will of God is the supreme unalterable rule for every intelligent creature. Equally binding every angel in heaven and every man upon earth. Nor can it be otherwise. This is the natural necessary result of the relation between creatures and their creator. But if the will of God be our one rule of action in everything, great and small, it follows, by undeniable consequence, that we are not to do our own will in anything. Here, therefore, we see at once the nature, with the ground and reason, of self-denial. We see the nature of self-denial. It is the denying or refusing to follow our own will from a conviction that the will of God is the only rule of action to us. And we see the reason thereof, because we are creatures, because it is he that hath made us and not we ourselves. This reason for self-denial must hold, even with regard to the angels of God in heaven, and with regard to man, innocent and holy, as he came out of the hands of his creator. But a farther reason for it arises from the condition wherein all men are since the fall. We are all now shapen in wickedness, and in sin did our mother conceive us. Our nature is altogether corrupt, in every power and faculty. And our will, depraved equally with the rest, is wholly bent to indulge our natural corruption. On the other hand, it is the will of God that we resist and counteract that corruption, not at some times, or in some things only, but at all times, and in all things. Here, therefore, is a farther ground for constant and universal self-denial. To illustrate this a little further, the will of God is a path leading straight to God. The will of man, which once ran parallel with it, is now another path, not only different from it, but, in our present state, directly contrary to it. It leads from God. If, therefore, we walk in the one, we must necessarily quit the other. We cannot walk in both. Indeed, a man of faint heart and feeble hands may go in two ways, one after the other, but he cannot walk in two ways at the same time. He cannot, at one and the same time, follow his own will, and follow the will of God. He must choose the one or the other, denying God's will to follow his own, or denying himself to follow the will of God. Now, it is undoubtedly pleasing for the time to follow our own will by indulging in any instance that offers the corruption of our nature. But by following it in anything, we so far strengthen the perverseness of our will, and by indulging it, we continually increase the corruption of our nature. So, by the food which is agreeable to the palate, we often increase a bodily disease. It gratifies the taste, but it inflames the disorder. It brings pleasure, but it also brings death. On the whole, then, to deny ourselves is to deny our own will, where it does not fall in with the will of God, and that, however pleasing it may be. It is to deny ourselves any pleasure which does not spring from and lead to God. That is, in effect, to refuse going out of our way, though it be into a pleasant flowery path, to refuse what we know to be deadly poison, though agreeable to the taste. And everyone that would follow Christ, that would be his real disciple, must not only deny himself, but take up his cross also. A cross is anything contrary to our will, anything displeasing to our nature. So that taking up our cross goes a little farther than denying ourselves, it rises a little higher, and is a more difficult task to flesh and blood, it being more easy to forego pleasure than to endure pain. Now, in running the race which is set before us, according to the will of God, there is often a cross lying in the way, that is, something which is not only not joyous, but grievous, something which is contrary to our will, which is displeasing to our nature. What, then, is to be done? The choice is plain. Either we must take up our cross, or we must turn aside from the way of God, from the holy commandment delivered to us, if we do not stop altogether, or turn back to everlasting perdition. In order to the healing of that corruption, that evil disease, which every man brings with him into the world, it is often needful to pluck out, as it were, a right eye, to cut off a right hand. So painful is either the thing itself which must be done, or the only means of doing it. The parting, suppose, with a foolish desire, with an inordinate affection, or a separation from the object of it, without which it can never be extinguished. In the former kind, the tearing away such a desire or affection, when it is deeply rooted in the soul, it is often like the piercing of a sword, yea, like the dividing asunder of the soul and spirit, the joints and marrow. The Lord, then, sits upon the soul as a refiner's fire, to burn all the dross thereof. And this is a cross indeed. It is essentially painful. It must be so, in the very nature of the thing. The soul cannot be thus torn asunder. It cannot pass through the fire without pain. In the latter kind, the means to heal a sin-sick soul, to cure a foolish desire, an inordinate affection, are often painful, not in the nature of the thing, but from the nature of the disease. So when our Lord said to the rich young man, Go sell that thou hast, and give it to the poor, as well knowing this was the only means of healing his covetousness, the very thought of it gave him so much pain, that he went away sorrowful, choosing rather to part with his hope of heaven than his possessions on earth. This was a burden he could not consent to lift, a cross he would not take up. And in the one kind or the other, every follower of Christ will surely have need to take up his cross daily. The taking up differs a little from bearing his cross. We are then properly said to bear our cross when we endure what is laid upon us without our choice, with meekness and resignation. Whereas we do not properly take up our cross, but when we voluntarily suffer what is in our power to avoid, when we willingly embrace the will of God, though contrary to our own, when we choose what is painful, because it is the will of our wise and gracious Creator. And thus it behooves every disciple of Christ to take up as well as to bear his cross. Indeed, in one sense, it is not his alone, it is common to him and many others, seeing there is no temptation befalls any man, but such as is common to men, such as is incident and adapted to their common nature and situation in the present world. But in another sense, as it is considered with all its circumstances, it is his, peculiar to himself. It is prepared of God for him. It is given by God to him as a token of his love. And, if he receives it as such, and, after using such means to remove the pressure, as Christian wisdom directs, lies as clay in the potter's hand, it is disposed and ordered by God for his good, both with regard to the quality of it, and in respect to its quantity and degree, its duration, and every other circumstance. In all this, we may easily conceive our blessed Lord to act as the physician of our souls, not merely for his own pleasure, but for our profit, that we may be partakers of his holiness. If, in searching our wounds, he puts us to pain, it is only in order to heal them. He cuts away what is putrefied or unsound in order to preserve the sound part. And, if we freely choose the loss of a limb rather than the whole body should perish, how much more should we choose, figuratively, to cut off a right hand rather than the whole soul should be cast into hell? We see plainly, then, both the nature and ground of taking up our cross. It does not imply the disciplining ourselves, as some speak, the literally tearing our own flesh, the wearing haircloth or iron girdles, or anything else that would impair our bodily health, although we know not what allowance God may make for those who act thus through involuntary ignorance, but the embracing the will of God, though contrary to our own, the choosing wholesome, though bitter, medicines, the freely accepting temporary pain, of whatever kind and in whatever degree, when it is either essentially or accidentally necessary to eternal pleasure. Part 2 I am, secondly, to show that it is always owing to the want of either self-denial or taking up his cross that any man does not thoroughly follow him, is not fully a disciple of Christ. It is true this may be partly owing, in some cases, to the want of the means of grace, of hearing the true word of God spoken with power, of the sacraments, or of Christian fellowship. But where none of these is wanting, the great hindrance of our receding or growing in the grace of God is always the want of denying ourselves or taking up our cross. A few instances will make this plain. A man hears the word which is able to save his soul. He is well pleased with what he hears, acknowledges the truth, and is a little affected by it. Yet he remains dead in trespasses and sins, senseless and unawakened. Why is this? Because he will not part with his bosom's sin, though he now knows it is an abomination to the Lord. He came to hear full of lust and unholy desires, and he will not part with them. Therefore, no deep impression is made upon him, but his foolish heart is still hardened. That is, he is still senseless and unawakened because he will not deny himself. Suppose he begins to awaken out of sleep, and his eyes are a little opened. Why are they so quickly closed again? Why does he again sink into the sleep of death? Because he again yields to his bosom's sin. He drinks again of the pleasing poison. Therefore, it is impossible that any lasting impression should be made upon his heart. That is, he relapses into his fatal insensibility because he will not deny himself. But this is not the case with all. We have many instances of those who, when once awakened, sleep no more. The impressions once received do not wear away. They are not only deep, but lasting. And yet, many of these have not found what they seek. They mourn and yet are not comforted. Now, why is this? It is because they do not bring forth fruits meat for repentance. Because they do not, according to the grace they have received, cease from evil and do good. They do not cease from the easily besetting sin, the sin of their constitution, of their education, or of their profession. Or they omit doing the good they may, and know they ought to do, because of some disagreeable circumstance attending it. That is, they do not attain faith because they will not deny themselves or take up their cross. But this man did receive the heavenly gift. He did taste of the powers of the world to come. He saw the light of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. The peace which passeth all understanding did rule his heart and mind, and the love of God was shed abroad therein by the Holy Ghost which was given unto him. Yet, he is now weak as another man. He again relishes the things of earth and has more taste for the things which are seen than those for which are not seen. The eye of his understanding is closed again so that he cannot see him that is invisible. His love is waxed cold, and the peace of God no longer rules in his heart. And no marvel, for he has again given place to the devil and grieved the Holy Spirit of God. He has turned again unto folly, to some pleasing sin, if not an outward act, yet in heart. He has given place to pride or anger or desire or self-will or stubbornness. Or he did not stir up the gift of God which was in him. He gave way to spiritual sloth and would not be at the pains of praying always and watching thereunto with all perseverance. That is, he made shipwreck of the faith for want of self-denial and taking up his cross daily. But perhaps he has not made a shipwreck of the faith. He has still a measure of the spirit of adoption which continues to witness with his spirit that he is a child of God. However, he is not going on to perfection. He is not, as once, hungering and thirsting after righteousness, panting after the whole image and full enjoyment of God, as the heart after the water brook. Rather, he is weary and faint in his mind, and, as it were, hovering between life and death. And why is he thus but because he hath forgotten the word of God by works his faith made perfect? He does not use all diligence in working the works of God. He does not continue instant in prayer, private as well as public, in communicating, hearing, meditation, fasting and religious conference. If he does not wholly neglect some of these means, at least he does not use them all with his might. Or he is not zealous of works of charity as well as works of piety. He is not merciful after his power with the full ability which God giveth. He does not fervently serve the Lord by doing good to men in every kind and in every degree he can to their souls as well as their bodies. And why does he not continue in prayer? Because in time of dryness it is pain and grief unto him. He does not continue in hearing at all opportunities because sleep is sweet or it is cold or dark or rainy. But why does he not continue in works of mercy? Because he cannot feed the hungry or clothe the naked unless he retrench the expense of his own apparel or use cheaper and less pleasing food. Beside which the visiting the sick or those that are in prison is attended with many disagreeable circumstances. And so are most works of spiritual mercy, reproof in particular. He would reprove his neighbor but sometimes shame, sometimes fear comes between. For he may expose himself not only to ridicule but to heavier inconveniences too. Upon these and the like considerations he omits one or more if not all works of mercy and piety. Therefore his faith is not made perfect. Neither can he grow in grace namely because he will not deny himself and take up his daily cross. It manifestly follows that it is always owing to the want either of self-denial or taking up his cross that a man does not thoroughly follow his Lord, that he is not fully a disciple of Christ. It is owing to this that he who is dead in sin does not awake though the trumpet be blown, that he who begins to awake out of sleep yet has no deep or lasting conviction, that he who is deeply and lastingly convinced of sin does not attain remission of sins, that some who have received this heavenly gift retain it not but make shipwreck of the faith, and that others, if they do not draw back to perdition, yet are weary and faint in their mind and do not reach the mark of the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus. How easily may we learn hence that they know neither the Scripture nor the power of God who directly or indirectly, in public or in private, oppose the doctrine of self-denial and the daily cross! How totally ignorant are these men of a hundred particular texts as well as of the general tenor of the whole oracles of God! And how entirely unacquainted must they be with true genuine Christian experience of the manner wherein the Holy Spirit ever did and does at this day work in the souls of men! They may talk indeed very loudly and confidently, a natural fruit of ignorance, as though they were the only men who understood either the word of God or the experience of His children. But their words are, in every sense, vain words. They are weighed in the balance and found wanting. We may learn from hence, secondly, the real cause why not only many particular persons but even bodies of men who were once burning and shining lights have now lost both their light and heat. If they did not hate and oppose, they at least lightly esteemed this precious gospel doctrine. If they did not boldly say, We trample all self-denial underfoot, we devote it to destruction. Yet they neither valued it according to its high importance nor took any pains in practicing it. Said that great bad man, The mystic writers teach self-denial. No, the inspired writers. And God teaches it to every soul who is willing to hear His voice. We may learn from hence, thirdly, that it is not enough for a minister of the gospel not to oppose the doctrine of self-denial, to say nothing concerning it. Nay, he cannot satisfy his duty by saying a little in favor of it. If he would indeed be pure from the blood of all men, he must speak of it frequently and largely. He must inculcate the necessity of it in the clearest and strongest manner. He must press it with his might on all persons at all times and in all places, laying line upon line, line upon line, precept upon precept, precept upon precept. So shall he have a conscience void of offense. So shall he save his own soul and those that hear him. Lastly, see that you apply this, every one of you, to your own soul. Meditate upon it when you are in secret. Ponder it in your heart. Take care not only to understand it thoroughly, but to remember it to your life's end. Cry unto the strong for strength that you may no sooner understand than enter upon the practice of it. Delay not the time, but practice it immediately from this very hour. Practice it universally on every one of the thousand occasions which will occur in all circumstances of life. Practice it daily without intermission from the hour you first set your hand to the plow and enduring therein to the end till your spirit returns to God. Hi, this is James Christian. I hope you have enjoyed what you just heard. You have been listening to the John Wesley Sermon Series. We are currently working to put all of Mr. Wesley's sermons, along with many other classic Christian texts, into audiobook form. There are so many great past Christian writers and I hope that this media forum will excite a new generation to hearing these messages. I would like to invite you to check out our other products. Please visit www.jameschristian.com That's www.jameschristian.com Thank you and may God bless you.
Self Denial (Reading)
- Bio
- Summary
- Transcript
- Download

John Wesley (1703 - 1791). English Anglican clergyman, evangelist, and co-founder of Methodism, born in Epworth, Lincolnshire, to a rector’s family. Educated at Oxford, where he earned an M.A. in 1727, he was ordained in 1728 and led the Holy Club with brother Charles, emphasizing disciplined faith. After a failed mission to Georgia (1735-1737), he experienced a transformative conversion in 1738 at Aldersgate, London, feeling his “heart strangely warmed.” Wesley preached over 40,000 sermons, often outdoors, sparking the 18th-century Evangelical Revival, and traveled 250,000 miles on horseback across Britain and Ireland. He authored 400 works, including A Plain Account of Christian Perfection (1777), and edited The Christian’s Pattern. Founding Methodist societies, he trained 650 preachers and ordained ministers for America, influencing millions. Married to Mary Vazeille in 1751, their childless union strained, but his brother’s hymns enriched worship. A tireless advocate for the poor, he opened dispensaries and schools, and his 1787 sermon against slavery stirred abolitionism. Despite tensions with the Church of England, he never left it, shaping global Protestantism. His maxim, “Do all the good you can, by all the means you can, in all the ways you can, in all the places you can, at all the times you can, to all the people you can, as long as ever you can,” inspired generations to active faith. Wesley’s journals and letters, still widely read, reveal a legacy of practical holiness and social reform