the rendering in the Auth. Vers. of the followving Heb. and Greek words:
DEN (Mat 21:13 = Mar 11:17 = Luk 19:46
The profits from these sources were enormous. It has been calculated that the annual income derived from money-changing can hardly have been less than £8000–£9000, while the sale of pigeons is specially referred to as furnishing alone a large annual income. These profits appear to have been largely, if not entirely, appropriated by the priests. Certain booths are frequently mentioned as belonging to the ‘sons of Hanan’ (Annas), and appear to have existed until about three years before the destruction of Jerusalem, when they were destroyed. Besides the mere fact that the Temple was made a house of merchandise (Joh 2:16), many passages in the Rabbinical writings appear to indicate that the Temple market was notorious for dishonest dealings, upon which passages it has been remarked (Speaker’s Com. in loc.) that the spaces in the court were probably let out to traffickers at an exorbitant rate. The remembrance of this state of things gives new force to the quotation from Jer 7:11 here used by our Lord.
Josephus (circa (about) Apion. ii. 24) writes: ‘The Temple ought to be common to all men, because He is the common God of all’; but, far from its being thus, it had become the possession of a few. ‘Ye gather together here money and animals, as robbers collect their booty in their den’ (Fritzsche, quoted by Lange).
Those who ought to have been the first to teach others the sacredness of the place had seized upon it, as robbers would seize some den or cave in the mountains, in which they might maintain their unity for the purpose of spoil. See, further, art. Temple in vol. ii.
Literature.—Edersheim, Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, also The Temple, etc.; Farrar, Life of Christ; Derenbourg, Hist. de Pal. [Note: Palestine, Palestinian.] ; and the Comm. ad loc.
J. B. Bristow.
("The Day"):
By: Richard Gottheil, Max Rosenthal
Russian Jewish weekly; published at Odessa (1869-71) by A. Zederbaum and I. Goldenblum, and edited by S. Ornstein. Among its collaborators were M. Morgulis, I. G. Orshanski, and L. Levanda.
(
