02.01. The Idea of Progress

LECTURE I THE IDEA OF PROGRESS I THE supposition that fish do not recog nize the existence of water nor birds the existence of air often has been used to illustrate the insensitive unaware- ness of which we all are capable in the pres ence of some encompassing medium of our lives. The illustration aptly fits the minds of multitudes in this generation, who live, as we all do, in the atmosphere of pro gressive hopes and yet are not intelligently aware of it nor conscious of its newness, its strangeness and its penetrating influence. ,We read as a matter of course such charac teristic lines as these from Tennyson:

" Yet I doubt not thro the ages one increas ing purpose runs, And the thoughts of men are widen d with the process of the suns."

Such lines, however, are not to be taken as a matter of course; until comparatively recent generations such an idea as that never had dawned on anybody s mind, and the story of the achievement of that progressive interpretation of history is one of the most fascinating narratives in the long record of man s mental Odyssey. In particular, the Christian who desires to understand the in fluences, both intellectual and practical, which are playing with transforming power upon Christianity today, upon its doctrines, its purposes, its institutions, and its social applications, must first of all understand the idea of progress. For like a changed climate, which in time alters the fauna and flora of a continent beyond the power of human conservatism to resist, this progres sive conception of life is affecting every thought and purpose of man, and no at tempted segregation of religion from its in fluence is likely to succeed. The significance of this judgment be comes the more clear when we note the fact that the idea of progress in our modern * sense is not to be found before the sixteenth} century. Men before that time had lived without progressive hopes just as before Copernicus they had lived upon a stationary earfrh. Man s life was not thought of as a growth; gradual change for the better was not supposed to be God s method with man kind ; the future was not conceived in terms of possible progress; and man s estate on earth was not looked upon as capable of in definite perfectibility. All these ideas, so familiar to us, were undreamed of in the ancient and medieval world. The new as tronomy is not a more complete break from the old geocentric system with its stationary earth than is our modern progressive way of thinking from our fathers static conception of human life and history.

II

It will be worth our while at the begin ning of our study to review in outline this development of the idea of progress, that we may better understand the reasons for its emergence and may more truly estimate its revolutionary effects. In the ancient world the Greeks, with all their far-flung speculations, never hit upon the idea of progress. To be sure, clear intimations, scattered here and there in Greek literature, indicate faith that man in the past had im proved his lot. Aeschylus saw men lifted from their hazardous lives in sunless caves by the intervention of Prometheus and his sacrificial teaching of the arts of peace;

Euripides contrasted the primitive barba rism in which man began with the civilized estate which in Greece he had achieved but this perceived advance never was erected into a progressive idea of human life as a whole. Rather, the original barba rism, from which the arts of civilization had for a little lifted men, was itself a degener ation from a previous ideal estate, and human history as a whole was a cyclic and repetitious story of never-ending rise and fall. Plato s philosophy of history was typical: the course of cosmic life is divided into cycles, each seventy-two thousand solar years in length; during the first half of each cycle, when creation newly comes from the hands of Deity, mankind s estate is happily ideal, but then decay begins and each cycle s latter half sinks from bad to worse until Deity once more must take a hand and make all things new again. Indeed, so far from reaching the idea of progress, the an cient Greeks at the very center of their thinking were incapacitated for such an achievement by their suspiciousness of change. They were artists and to them the perfect was finished, like the Parthenon, and therefore was incapable of being im proved by change. Change, so far from meaning, as it does with us, the possibility of betterment, meant with them the cer tainty of decay; no changes upon earth in the long run were good; all change was the sure sign that the period of degeneration had set in from which only divine interven tion could redeem mankind. Paul on Mars Hill quoted the Greek poet Aratus concern ing the sonship of all mankind to God, but Aratus s philosophy of history is not so pleasantly quotable:

" How base a progeny sprang from golden sires ! And viler shall they be whom ye beget." 1 Such, in general, was the non-progressive outlook of the ancient Greeks. Nor did the Romans hit upon the idea of progress in any form remotely approaching our m.odern meaning. The casual reader, to be sure, will find occasional flares of ex pectancy about the future or of pride in the advance of the past which at first suggest progressive interpretations of history. So Seneca, rejoicing because he thought he knew the explanation of the moon s eclipses, wrote: "The days will come when those things which now lie hidden time and human diligence will bring to light. . . . iAratus of Soli : Phaenomena, lines 122-3. The days will come when our posterity will marvel that we were ignorant of truths so obvious." 1 So, too, the Epicureans, like the Greek tragedians before them, believed that human knowledge and effort had lifted mankind out of primitive barbarism and Lucretius described how man by the devel opment of agriculture and navigation, the building of cities and the establishment of laws, the manufacture of physical conve niences and the creation of artistic beauty, had risen, " gradually progressing," to his present height. 2 Such hopeful changes in the past, however, were not the prophecies of continuous advance; they were but inci dental fluctuations in a historic process which knew no progress as a whole. Even the Stoics saw in history only a recurrent rise and fall in endless repetition so that all apparent change for good or evil was but the influx or the ebbing of the tide in an essentially unchanging sea. The words of Marcus Aurelius are typical : " The periodic movements of the universe are the same, up and down from age to age " ; " He who has seen present things has seen all, both every- 1 Lucius Annaeus Seneca: Naturalium Quaestionum, Liber VII, 25.

2 T. Lucretius Carus : De Rerum Natura, Lib. V, 1455 "Paullatim docuit pedetentim progredienteis." thing which has taken place from all eter nity and everything which will be for time without end; for all are of one kin and of one form " ; " He who is forty years old, if he has any understanding at all, has, by^ virtue of the uniformity that prevails, seen all things which have been and all that will be." 1 When with these Greek and Roman ideas the Hebrew-Christian influences blended, no conception of progress in the modern sense was added by the Church s contribu tion. To be sure, the Christians uncom promising faith in personality as the object of divine redemption and their vigorous hope about the future of God s people in the next world, if not in this, calcined some elements in the classical tradition. Belief in cycles, endlessly repeating themselves through cosmic ages, went by the board. This earth became the theatre of a unique experiment made once for all; in place of the ebb and flow of tides in a changeless sea, mankind s story became a drama moving toward a climactic denouement that would shake heaven and earth together in a divine cataclysm. But this consummation of all 1 Marcus Aurelius Antoninus: Meditations, IX, 28; VI, 37; XI, 1. history was not a goal progressively to be achieved; it was a divine invasion of the world expectantly to be awaited, when the victorious Christ would return and the Day of Judgment dawn. The development of this apocalyptic phrasing of hope has been traced too often to require long rehearsal here. If the Greeks were essentially philosophers and welcomed congenially ideas like endless cos mic cycles, the Hebrews were essentially practical and dramatic in their thinking and they welcomed a picture of God s victory capable of being visualized by the imagina tion. At first their national hopes had been set on the restoration of the Davidic king dom ; then the Davidic king himself had grown in their imagination until, as Mes siah in a proper sense, he gathered to him self supernal attributes; then, as a child of their desperate national circumstances, the hope was born of their Messiah s sudden coming on the clouds of heaven for their help. Between the Testaments this expec tation expanded and robed itself with pomp and glory, so that when the Christians came they found awaiting them a phrasing of hope which they accepted to body forth their certainty of God s coming sovereignty over all the earth. This expectation of com ing triumph was not progressive; it was cataclysmic. It did not offer the prospect of great gains to be worked for over long, periods of time; it offered a divine invasion of history immediately at hand. It was pictured, not in terms of human betterment to be achieved, but of divine action to be awaited. The victory would suddenly come like the flood in Noah s day, like the light ning flashing from one end of the heaven to the other, like a thief in the night. To be sure, this eager expectation of a heavenly kingdom immediately to arrive on earth soon grew dim among the Christians, and the reasons are obvious. For one thing, the Church herself, moving out from days of hardship to days of preferment and pros perity, began to allure with her inviting prospects of growing power the enthusi asms and hopes of the people, until not the suddenly appearing kingdom from the heavens, but the expanding Church on earth became the center of Christian interest. For another thing, Christ meant more to Christians than the inaugurator of a post poned kingdom which, long awaited with ardent expectation, still did not arrive; Christ was the giver of eternal life now.

More and more the emphasis shifted from what Christ would do for his people when he came upon the clouds of heaven to what he was doing for them through his spiritual presence with them. Even in the Fourth Gospel one finds this good news that Christ had already come again in the hearts of his people insisted on in evident contrast with the apocalyptic hope literally conceived. For another thing, dramatic hopes of a sud den invasion of the world are always the offspring of desperate conditions. Only when people are hard put to it do they want history catastrophically stopped in the midst of its course. The Book of Daniel must be explained by the tyrannies of Antiochus Epiphanes, the Book of Revelation by the persecutions of Domitian, the present re crudescence of pre-millennialism by the tragedy of the Great War. But when the persecution of the Church by the State gave way to the running of the State by the Church ; when to be a Christian was no longer a road to the lions but the sine qua non of preferment and power; when the souls under the altar ceased crying, " How long, O Master, the holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth ? " then the apocalyptic hopes grew dim and the old desire for a kingdom immediately to come was subdued to an expectation, no longer im perative and urgent, that sometime the course of history would stop on Judgment Day. In all these Greek and Roman, Hebrew and Christian contributions, which flowed together and then flowed out into the medi eval age, there was no suggestion of a mod ern idea of progress, and in the medieval age itself there was nothing to create a fresh phrasing of expectancy. Men were aware of the darkness of the days that had fallen on the earth; even when they began to rouse themselves from their lethargy, their thoughts of greatness did not reach forward toward a golden age ahead but harked back " To the glory that was Greece And the grandeur that was Rome," and their intellectual life, instead of being an adventurous search for new truth, was a laborious endeavour to stabilize the truth already formulated in the great days of the early Church. Indeed, the Church s specific contribution of a vividly imagined faith in a future world, as the goal of the most absorbing hopes and fears of men, tended rather to confirm than to dissipate the static con ception of earthly life and history. With an urgency that the ancient world had never known the Christian world believed in im mortality and visualized the circumstances of the life to come so concretely that in a medieval catechism the lurid colour of the setting sun was ascribed to the supposi tion that " he looketh down upon hell." l Nothing in this life had any importance save as it prepared the souls of men for life to come. Even Roger Bacon, his mind flash ing like a beacon from below the sky-line of the modern world, w r as sure that all man s knowledge of nature was useful only in pre paring his soul to await the coming of Anti christ and the Day of Judgment. There was no idea of progress, then, in the medieval age. Human life and history were static and the only change to be anticipated was the climactic event " When earth breaks up and heaven expands."

Ill The emergence of modern progressive 1 Andrew D. White: A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom, Vol. I, p. 97. hopes out of this static medievalism is one of the epic occurrences of history. The causes which furthered the movement seem now in retrospect to be woven into a fabric so tightly meshed as to resist unraveling". Nevertheless, it is not difficult to see at least some of the major factors which furthered this revolutionary change from a static to a progressive world.

Among the first, scientific invention is surely to be noted. Even Roger Bacon, prophecying with clairvoyant insight far in advance of the event, foresaw one of the determining factors of the modern age: " Machines for navigating can be made so that without rowers great ships can be guided by one pilot on river or sea more swiftly than if they were full of oarsmen. Likewise vehicles are possible which with out draught-animals can be propelled with incredible speed, like the scythed chariots, as we picture them, in which antiquity fought. Likewise a flying machine is pos sible in the middle of which a man may sit, using some ingenious device by which arti ficial wings will beat the air like those of a flying bird. Also machines, small in size, can be constructed to lift and move unlim ited weights, than which in an emergency nothing is more useful." So dreamed the great friar in the thirteenth century. When, then, we find the minds of men first throw ing off their intellectual vassalage to an tiquity and beginning to believe in them selves, their present powers and their future prospects, it is this new-found mas tery over nature s latent resources which is the spring and fountain of their confidence. Cardan, in the sixteenth century, marveling at the then modern inventions of the com pass, the printing press, and gunpowder, cried, " All antiquity has nothing compa rable to these three things." 2 Every year from that day to this has deepened the im pression made upon the minds of men by the marvelous prospect of harnessing the resources of the universe. The last one hundred and twenty-five years have seen the invention of the locomotive, the steam ship, the telegraph, the sewing machine, the camera, the telephone, the gasoline engine, wireless telegraphy and telephony, and the many other applications of electricity. As one by one new areas of power have thus iRoger Bacon: Epistola de Secretis Operibus Artis et Naturae, et de Nullitate Magiae, Caput IV, in Opera Quaedam Hactenus Inedita, edited by J. S. Brewer, p. 533.

2 Jerome Cardan: De Subtilitate, Liber Decimussepti- mus : De artibus, artificiosisque rebus. come under the control of man, with every conquest suggesting many more not yet achieved but brought within range of possi bility, old theories of cosmic degeneration and circular futility have gone to pieces, the glamour of antiquity has lost its allurement, the great days of humanity upon the earth have been projected into the future, and the gradual achievement of human progress has become the hope of man.

Another element in the emergence of the modern progressive outlook upon life is im mediately consequent upon the first: world wide discovery, exploration and intercom munication. Great as the practical results have been which trace their source to the adventurers who, from Columbus down, pioneered unknown seas to unknown lands, the psychological effects have been greater still. Who could longer live cooped up in a static world, when the old barriers were so being overpassed and new continents were inviting adventure, settlement, and social experiment hitherto untried? The theolog ical progressiveness of the Pilgrim Fathers, starting out from Leyden for a new world, was not primarily a matter of speculation; it was even more a matter of an adventurous spirit, which, once admitted into life, could not be kept out of religious thought as well. In Edward Winslow s account of Pastor Robinson s last sermon before the little company of pioneers left Leyden, we read that Robinson " took occasion also miser ably to bewaile the state and condition of the Reformed Churches, who were come to a period in Religion, and would goe no further than the instruments of their Refor mation: As for example, the Lutherans they could not be drawne to goe beyond what Luther saw, for whatever part of God s will he had further imparted and revealed to Calvin, they will die rather than embrace it. And so also, saith he, you see the Calvinists, they stick where he left them: a misery much to bee lamented; For though they were precious shining lights in their times, yet God hath not revealed his whole will to them : And were they now living, saith hee, they would bee as ready and willing to em brace further light, as that they had re ceived." Static methods of thinking are here evidently going to pieces before the impact of a distinctly unstatic world. They were looking for " more truth and light yet to breake forth out of his holy Word " 2 iRdward Winslow: Hypocrisie Unmasked, p. 97. 2Ibid. because they lived in a time when new things had been happening at an exhilarat ing rate and when pioneering adventure and general travel in a world of open avenues were already beginning to have that liberat ing effect which has increased with every passing century.

Closely allied with the two elements al ready noted is a third: the increase of knowledge, which, as in the case of astron omy, threw discredit upon the superior claims of antiquity and made modern men seem wiser than their sires. For ages the conviction had held the ground that the ancients were the wisest men who ever lived and that we, their children, were but infants in comparison. When, therefore, the Copernican astronomy proved true, when the first terrific shock of it had passed through resultant anger into wonder and from wonder into stupefied acceptance, and from that at last into amazed exultation at the vast, new universe unveiled, the credit of antiquity received a stunning blow. So far was Aristotle from being " the master of those who know " whom the medievalists had revered, that he had not even known the shape and motion of the earth or its re lation with the sun. For the first time in history the idea emerged that humanity accumulates knowledge, that the ancients were the infants, that the moderns represent the age and wisdom of the race. Consider the significance of those words of Pascal in the seventeenth century: " Those whom we call ancient were really new in all things, and properly constituted the infancy of mankind ; and as we have joined to their knowledge the experience of the centuries which have followed them, it is in ourselves that we should find this antiquity that we revere in others." * For the first time in history men turned their faces, in their search for knowledge, not backward but for ward, and began to experience that attitude which with us is habitual standing on tip toe in eager expectancy, sure that to morrow some new and unheard of truth will be revealed.

New inventions, new discoveries, new knowledge even before the eighteenth century all these factors were under way. Then a new factor entered which has played a powerful part in substituting a progres sive for a static world: new social hopes. iBlaise Pascal: Opuscules, Preface to the Treatise on Vacuum, in The Thoughts, Letters and Opuscules of Blaise Pascal, Translated by O. W. Wight, p. 550. The medieval age had no expectation of a better social life on earth. Charity was common but it was purely individual and remedial; it did not seek to understand or to cure the causes of social maladjustment; it was sustained by no expectation of better conditions among men ; it was valued be cause of the giver s unselfishness rather than because of the recipient s gain, and in conse quence it was for the most part unregulated alms-giving, piously motived but ineffi ciently managed. In the eighteenth century a new outlook and hope emerged. If man could pioneer new lands, learn new truthi and make new inventions, why could he not devise new social systems where human life would be freed from the miseries of mis- government and oppression? With that question at last definitely rising, the long line of social reformers began whichi stretched from Abbe de Saint-Pierre to the latest believer in the possibility of a more decent and salutary social life for human kind. The coming of democracy in govern ment incalculably stimulated the influence of this social hope, for with the old static forms of absolute autocracy now broken up, with power in the hands of the people to seek as they would " life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," who could put limits to the possibilities? The medieval age was gone; the modern age had come, and its dis tinctive note was progress, with new in ventions, new discoveries, new knowledge and new social hope.

It w r ould be a fascinating task to watch these interweaving factors at their work and to trace their commingled influence as slowly their involved significance became clear, now to this man and now to that. The best narrative that has been written yet of this epochal movement is contained in Professor Bury s volume on " The Idea of Progress." There one sees- the stream of this progressive conception of life pushing its way out as through a delta by way of many minds, often far separated yet flowing with the same water. Some men attacked the ancients and by comparison praised the modern time as Perrault did with " The* Age of Louis the Great " ; some men fore saw so clearly the possibility of man s con trol over nature that they dreamed of ter restrial Utopias as Francis Bacon did in " New Atlantis " ; some men, like Descartes, sought to grasp the intellectual conditions of human improvement; and others, like Condorcet, became the fervid prophets of human perfectibility; some, like Turgot, re- examined history in terms of the new ideas; and some, like Saint Simon and Comte, sought to discover the law by which all progress moves. This new idea of life and history came " by divers portions and in divers manners," but no one can doubt its arrival. The life of man upon this earth was no longer conceived as static; it was pro gressive and the possibilities that lay ahead made all the achievements of the past seem like the play of childhood. At last, in the nineteenth century, the climactic factor was added which gathered up all the rest and embraced them in a com prehensive philosophy of life. Evolution became a credible truth. No longer a dim conjecture, it was established in biology, and then it spread its influence out into every area of human thought until all history was conceived in genetic terms and all the sciences were founded upon the evo lutionary idea. Growth became recognized as the fundamental law of life. Nothing in the universe without, or in man s life within, could longer be conceived as having sprung full-statured, like Minerva from the head of Jove. All things achieved maturity by grad ual processes. The world itself had thus come into being, not artificially nailed to gether like a box, but growing like a tree, putting forth ever new branches and new leaves. When this idea had firmly grasped the human mind, the modern age had come indeed, and progress was its distinctive category of understanding and its exhilarat ing phrasing of human hope. Then came the days of mid-Victorian optimism with songs like this upon men s lips:

" Every tiger madness muzzled, every serpent passion kill d, Every grim ravine a garden, every blazing desert till d, " Robed in universal harvest up to either pole she smiles, Universal ocean softly washing all her war- less isles." i

IV

Any one, however, who has lived witH discerning thought through! the opening years of the twentieth century, must be aware that something has happened to chasten and subdue these wildly enthusi astic hopes of the mid-Victorian age. Others beside the " gloomy dean " of St. Paul s, whether through well-considered 1 Alfred Tennyson: Locksley Hall Sixty Years After. thought or through the psychological shock of the Great War, have come to look upon this rash, unmitigated enthusiasm about the earth s future as a fool s paradise. At any rate, no treatment of the idea of progress would be complete which did not dwell upon the limitations to that idea, now definitely obvious to thoughtful men. As early as 1879, in Saporta s " Le Monde des Plantes," we run upon one serious set back to unqualified expectations of progress. Men began to take into account the fact that this earth is not a permanent affair. " We recognize from this point of view as from others," wrote Saporta, " that the world was once young; then adolescent; that it has even passed the age of maturity; man has come late, when a beginning of physical decadence had struck the globe, his domain." * Here is a fact to give enthusi asm, over earthly progress serious pause. This earth, once uninhabitable, will be unin habitable again. If not by wholesale catas trophe, then by the slow wearing down of the sun s heat, already passed its climac teric, this planet, the transient theatre of the human drama, will be no longer the 1 Comte de Saporta: Le Monde des Plantes avant L* Apparition de L Homme, p. 109. scene of man s activity, but as cold as the moon, or as hot as colliding stars in heaven, will be able to sustain human life no more. The grandest material works of the human race," wrote Faye in 1884, " will have to be effaced by degrees under the action of a few physical forces which will survive man for a time. Nothing will remain, not even the ruins. 7 1

Every suggested clew to a possible escape from the grimness of the planet s dissolution has been followed up with careful search. The discovery of radioactivity seemed to promise endlessly extended life to our sun, but Sir E. Rutherford, before the Royal Astronomical Society, has roundly denied that the discovery materially lengthens our estimate of the sun s tenure of life and has said that if the sun were made of uranium it would not because of that last five years the longer as a giver of heat. 2 Whether we will or not, we have no choice except to face the tremendous fact, calmly set down by von Hartmann in 1904: " The only question is whether . . . the world-process will work itself out slowly in prodigious lapse of time, 1 H. Faye: Sur L Origine du Monde. Chapitre XI p 256-7.

2 Joseph McCabe: The End of the World, p. 112. according to purely physical laws ; or whether it will find its end by means of some metaphysical resource when it has reached its culminating" point. Only in the last case would its end coincide with the fulfilment of a purpose or object; in the first case, a long period of purposeless existence would follow after the culmination of life." * In a word, men delighted at the prospect of human progress on this planet have made an idol of it, only to discover that on a transient earth it leads nowhere without God and immortality. One disciple of naturalism recently denied his desire to be lieve in God because he wanted a risky uni verse. But the universe without God is not risky; it is a foregone conclusion; the dice are all loaded. After the lapse of millions of years which, however long they be stretched out, will ultimately end, our solar system will be gone, without even a memory left of anything that ever was dreamed or done within it. That is the inevitable issue of such a " risky " universe. When scien tifically-minded men, therefore, now take a long look ahead, the Utopian visions of the mid-Victorian age are not foremost in their iEduard von Hartmann : Ansgewahlte Werke, viii, pp. 572-3 (Leipzig, 1904). thought. Rather, as one of them recently wrote :

" One is tempted to imagine this race of super men, of some millions of years hence, grimly con fronting the issue of extinction. Probably long be fore that time science will have perfectly mastered the problem of the sun s heat, and will be able to state precisely at what period the radiation will sink to a level which would normally be fatal to the liv ing inhabitants of the planets. Then will begin the greatest of cosmic events: a drama that has doubt less been played numbers of times already on the stage of the universe: the last stand of the wonder ful microcosm against the brute force of the macrocosm

" One conceives that our supermen will face the end philosophically. Death is losing its terrors. The race will genially say, as we individuals do to-day, that it has had a long run. But it will none-the-less make a grim fight. Life will be worth living, for everybody, long before that consummation is in sight. The hovering demon of cold and darkness will be combatted by scientific means of which we have not the germ of a conception." 1

If ever a river ran out into a desert, the river of progressive hopes, fed only from springs of materialistic philosophy, has done so here. At least the Greeks had their immor tality and the Hebrews their coming King dom of God, but a modern materialist, with all his talk of progress, has neither the one i Joseph McCabe: The End of the World, pp. 116- 117. nor the other, nor anything to take their place as an ultimate for hope. Whatever else may be true, progress on a transient planet has not done away with the need of God and life eternal.

Moreover, not only have our twentieth century thought and experience seriously qualified the meaning of progress on this earth by the limiting of the earth s duration ; men have come also to distrust, as a quite unjustified flourish of sentimentality, the mid-Victorian confidence in an automatic evolution which willy-nilly lifts human ity to higher levels. Said Herbert Spencer, " Progress is not an accident, not a thing within human control, but a beneficent ne cessity." " This advancement is due to the working of a universal law; ... in virtue of that law it must continue until the state we call perfection is reached. . . . Thus the ultimate development of the ideal man is logically certain as certain as any con clusion in which we place the most implicit faith; ... so surely must the things we call evil and immorality disappear; so surely must man become perfect." l There is no

1 Herbert Spencer : Illustrations of Universal Progress, Chapter I, Progress: Its Law and Cause, p. 58; Social Statics, Part I, Chapter II, The Evanescence of Evil, Sec. 4, p. 78ff. scientific basis whatever for such a judg ment. Evolution is not an escalator which, whether or not man run in addition to its lift, will inevitably raise humanity to a heaven on earth. Potatoes in the cellar shooting out long white eyes in search of light are evolving, but they are evolving worse. Upon the basis of a scientific doc trine of evolution, no idolatrous supersti tion could be much more lacking in intel lectual support than Spencer s confidence in a universal, mechanical, irresistible move ment toward perfection. The plain fact is that human history is a strange blend of progress and regress; it is the story of the rhythmic rise and fall of civilizations and empires, of gains made only to be lost and lost only to be fought for once again. Even when advance has come, it has come by mingled progress and cataclysm as water passes, through gradual increase of warmth, from ice suddenly to liquid and from liquid suddenly to vapour. Our nineteenth century ideas of evolution tended to create in us the impression that humanity had made a smooth and even ascent. We artificially graded the ascending track of human his tory, leveled and macadamized it, and talked of inevitable progress. Such sentimental optimism has ceased even to be com forting, so utterly untenable has it become to every well-instructed mind. To such unfounded faith in automatic progress a valuable counterweight is ac quaintance with the life of a man like St. Augustine. As one reads Augustine s ser mons one can hear in the background the collapse of a great civilization. One can tell from his discourses when the barbarians began to move on Rome. One can hear the crash when Alaric and his hordes sacked the Eternal City. One can catch the accent of horror at the tidal waves of anarchy that everywhere swept in to engulf the falling empire. " Horrible things," said Augustine, " have been told us. There have been ruins, and fires, and rapine, and murder, and tor ture. That is true; we have heard it many times; we have shuddered at all this dis aster; we have often wept, and we have hardly been able to console ourselves." At last, the empire in ruins, the old civiliza tion tottering to its collapse, Augustine died in his episcopal city of Hippo, while the barbarians were hammering at the city gates. Through such scenes this generation too has lived and has had to learn again, iLouis Bertrand: Saint Augustin, p. 342. what we never should have forgotten, that human history is not a smooth and well- rolled lawn of soft ascents; that it is mountainous, precipitous, terrific a coun try where all progress must be won by dint of intelligence and toil, and where it is as easy to lose the gains of civilization as it is to fall over a cliff or to surrender a wheat field to the weeds. An archeologist in Mesopotamia talked with an Arab lad who neither read, himself, nor knew any one who did; yet the lad, when he acknowledged this, stood within a stone s throw of the site where milleniums ago was one of the great est universities of the ancient world and where still, amid the desolation, one could dig and find the old clay tablets on which the children of that ancient time had learned to write. Progress? Regress! While history as a whole, from the Cro- Magnon man to the twentieth century, does certainly suggest a great ascent, it has not been an automatic levitation. It has been a fight, tragic and ceaseless, against destruc tive forces. This world needs something more than a soft gospel of inevitable prog ress. It needs salvation from its ignorance, its sin, its inefficiency, its apathy, its silly optimisms and its appalling carelessness.

Nevertheless, though it is true that our modern ideas of progress on this earth never in themselves can supply an adequate philosophy of life, and though it is true that they do not dispense with, but rather em- 1 phasize, our need of God and immortality I and the saving powers which Christians find 1 in Christ, yet those ideas have in them a permanent contribution to the life of man from whose influence the race cannot es cape. When we have granted the limita tions which disillusioned thoughtfulness suggests concerning progress upon this earth, it still remains true that, in our new scientific control over the latent resources of the earth without and over our own mental and moral processes within, we have a machinery for producing change that opens up exciting prospects before human ity. Never in our outlook upon man s earthly future can we go back to the end less cosmic cycles of the Greeks or the apocalyptic expectations of the Hebrews. We are committed to the hope of making progress, and the central problem which Christianity faces in adjusting her thought and practice to the modern age is the problem of coming to intelligent terms with this dominant idea.

These lectures are an excursion to spy out this land and to see, if we may, what the idea of progress through the scientific con trol of life is likely to mean and ought to) mean to Christianity. If this modern idea is not intelligently guided in its effect upon our faith and practice, it will none the less have its effect in haphazard, accidental, un- guided, and probably ruinous ways. If one listens, for example, to the preaching of lib eral ministers, one sees that every accent of their teaching has been affected by this prevalent and permeating thought. The God they preach no longer sits afar like Dante s deity in the stationary empyrean beyond all reach of change; their God is here in the midst of the human struggle, " their Captain in the well-fought fight." H. G. Wells may be a poor theologian but he is one of our best interpreters of popular thought and his idea of God, marching through the world " like fifes and drums," calling the people to a progressive crusade for righteousness, is one which modern folk find it most easy to accept. He is a God of progress who undergirds our endeavours for justice in the earth with his power; who fights in and for and with us against the hosts of evil; whose presence is a guarantee of ultimate victory; and whose effect upon us is to send us out to war against ancient human curses, assured that what ought to be done can be done. As men s thought of God has thus been molded by the idea of progress on the earth, so, too, the Christ they preach is not pri marily, as of old, the victim by whose sub- stitutionary sacrifice the race of men has found an open door from the bottomless pit of endless woe to a blessed immortality in Paradise. The modern emphasis is all an other way. Christ is the divine revealer whose spirit alone can transform individuals and save society. The sort of character he was, the life he lived, the ideas he promul gated, are the salt that can preserve human life, the light that can illumine the way to a kingdom of righteousness on earth. He himself is the leader in the fight for that kingdom, his sacrifice part of the price it costs, his spirit the quality of life that is in dispensable to its coming, and when we think of him we sing, " The Son of God goes forth to war. . . . Who follows in his train ? "

So, too, the Church, as presented by typ ical modern preachers, is no longer an ark to which, from the flood of wrath divine, the few may flee for safety. If men tried to preach in that way, the message would stick in their throats. The Church is primarily an instrument in God s hands to bring per sonal and social righteousness upon the earth. When her massed influence over comes a public evil or establishes a public good, men find the justification of her exis tence and a first-rate weapon of apologetic argument in her behalf. When wars come, the Church is blamed because she did not prevent them; when wars are over, she takes counsel how she may prove* the validity of her message by making their re currence impossible; and the pitiful dismem berment of the Church by sects and schisms is hated and deplored, not so much because of economic waste or theological folly, as because these insane divisions prevent social effectiveness in bringing the message of Christ to bear influentially on modern life.

Likewise, hope, deeply affected by mod ern ideas of earthly progress, is not prima rily post-mortem, as it used to be. Men believe in immortality, but it seems so natu rally the continuance of this present life that their responsible concern is chiefly centered here. The hopes which waken immediate enthusiasm and stir spontaneous response are hopes of righteousness victorious upon the earth. Because men believe in God, they believe that he has great purposes for humankind. The course of human history is like a river: sometimes it flows so slowly that one would hardly know it moved at all ; sometimes bends come in its channel so that one can hardly see in what direction it in tends to go; sometimes there are back- eddies so that it seems to be retreating on itself. If a man has no spiritual interpreta tion of life, if he does not believe in God, he may well give up hope and conclude that the human river is flowing all awry or has altogether ceased to move. A Christian, however, has a spiritual interpretation of life. He knows that human history is a river not a whirlpool, nor a pond, but a river flowing to its end. Just as, far inland, we can tell that the Hudson is flowing to the sea, because the waters, when the tide comes in, are tinctured with the ocean s quality, so now, we believe that we can tell that the river of human history is flowing out toward the kingdom of our God. Al ready the setback of the divine ocean is felt among us in ideals of better life, personal, social, economic, national. That it is Chris tianity s function to believe in these ideals, to have faith in the possibility of their real ization, to supply motives for their achieve ment, and to work for them with courage and sacrifice, is the familiar note of modern Christian hope. The modern apologetic also is tinctured with this same quality. Not as of old is it a laboured working out of metaphysical propositions. Rather, a modern Christian preacher s defense of the Gospel may be paraphrased in some such strain as this: You never can achieve a decent human life upon this planet apart from the Christian Gospel. Neither outward economic comfort nor international treaties of peace can save the day for humanity. Not even when our present situation is described as " a race between education and catastrophe " has the case been adequately stated. What kind of education is meant? If every man and woman on earth were a Ph. D., would that solve the human problem ? Aaron Burr had a far keener intellect than George Wash ington. So far as swiftness and agility of intelligence were concerned, Burr far out distanced the slow-pacing mind of Washington. But, for all that, as you watch Burr s life, and many another s like him, you understand what Macaulay meant when he exclaimed : " as if history were not made up of the bad actions of extraordinary men, as if all the most noted destroyers and deceiv ers of our species, all the founders of arbi trary governments and false religions, had not been extraordinary men, as if nine tenths of the calamities which have befallen the human race had any other origin than the union of high intelligence with low de sires." Was Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon unintelligent? Caesar and Napoleon were they unintelligent? Has the most monu mental and destructive selfishness in human history been associated with poor minds? No, with great minds, which, if the world was to be saved their devastation, needed to be reborn into a new spirit. The trans forming gospel which religion brings is in dispensable to a building of the kingdom of righteousness upon the earth.

Wherever one listens, then, to the typical teaching of modern Christians, he finds him self in the atmosphere of the idea of prog ress. Men s thoughts of God, of Christ, of the Church, of hope, their methods of apolo getic, are shaped to that mold are often thinned out and flattened down and made cheap and unconvincing by being shaped to that mold so that an endeavour to achieve an intelligent understanding of Christian ity s relationship with the idea of progress is in part a defensive measure to save the Gospel from being unintelligently mauled and mishandled by it. Marcus Dods, when he was an old man, said: "I do not envy those who have to fight the battle of Chris tianity in the twentieth century." Then, after a moment, he added, " Yes, perhaps I do, but it will be a stiff fight." It is a stiff fight, and for this reason if for no other, that before we can get on much further in a progressive world we must achieve with wisdom and courage some fundamental re constructions in our Christian thinking.