William Dool Killen addresses the theological inquiries surrounding the genuineness of the Epistles attributed to Ignatius of Antioch, critiquing the arguments presented by J.B. Lightfoot in favor of their authenticity. Killen highlights the historical criticism involved, pointing out the controversy that has surrounded these letters since the Reformation period. He questions the legitimacy of the Ignatian Epistles, emphasizing the implications of accepting them as genuine on the faith and historical accuracy of the early Christian Church.

William Dool Killen delves into the examination of the testimony of Polycarp to the Ignatian Epistles, challenging the authenticity and credibility of these letters attributed to Ignatius. He highlights the discrepancies in the authentication of the Ignatian letters compared to the genuine second-century writings like the letter of Polycarp to the Philippians. Killen emphasizes the internal and external evidence supporting the authenticity of Polycarp's letter, showcasing its relevance and reliability in contrast to the Ignatian Epistles. He sheds light on the historical context, dating, and content of Polycarp's letter, suggesting a different interpretation of the recipients and purpose of the correspondence, ultimately questioning the traditional understanding of the Ignatian Epistles.

William Dool Killen preaches about the controversy surrounding the date of the martyrdom of Polycarp and its implications on the Ignatian Epistles. He discusses the arguments presented by Dr. Lightfoot and Archbishop Ussher, highlighting the discrepancies in chronology and the historical evidence supporting a later date for Polycarp's martyrdom. Killen emphasizes the importance of accurate historical context in understanding the authenticity of ancient texts and the significance of reliable testimonies from early Christian writers like Eusebius and Jerome.

William Dool Killen delves into 'The Testimony of Irenaeus and the Genesis of Prelacy,' examining the claims of the Epistles attributed to Ignatius and the development of Episcopacy in the early Christian Church. The evidence from Irenaeus and Polycarp's writings fails to support the authenticity of the Ignatian letters, leading to suspicions of forgery. Dr. Lightfoot's arguments for the early spread of Episcopacy in Asia Minor and Syria are challenged, highlighting the lack of solid foundation for such claims.

William Dool Killen delves into the controversial topic of the Ignatian Epistles, suggesting that they are likely forgeries originating in the early part of the third century. He explores the possible involvement of Callistus, who later became Bishop of Rome, in the creation of these letters to strengthen the hierarchy of the Church. The Epistle to the Romans, believed to be the first produced, subtly introduces the concept of episcopal authority and martyrdom, aiming to solidify the claims of the bishops. Killen highlights the intricate web of deceit and manipulation woven into these letters, challenging the authenticity and motives behind their composition.

William Dool Killen discusses the controversy surrounding the Ignatian Epistles, particularly focusing on the skepticism expressed by Dr. Cureton, a prominent scholar. Dr. Cureton, despite spending twenty years studying the Ignatian Epistles, admits to attaching 'no very great importance' to them and acknowledges the ongoing mystery surrounding the subject. Killen highlights the lack of concrete evidence presented by Dr. Cureton to refute the arguments against the authenticity of the Ignatian Epistles. Additionally, Killen points out the fanaticism and mysticism present in the Ignatian Epistle to the Romans, contrasting it with the piety found in the New Testament.