- Home
- Speakers
- A.W. Tozer
- The Deeper Life Part 2
The Deeper Life - Part 2
A.W. Tozer

A.W. Tozer (1897 - 1963). American pastor, author, and spiritual mentor born in La Jose, Pennsylvania. Converted to Christianity at 17 after hearing a street preacher in Akron, Ohio, he began pastoring in 1919 with the Christian and Missionary Alliance without formal theological training. He served primarily at Southside Alliance Church in Chicago (1928-1959) and later in Toronto. Tozer wrote over 40 books, including classics like "The Pursuit of God" and "The Knowledge of the Holy," emphasizing a deeper relationship with God. Self-educated, he received two honorary doctorates. Editor of Alliance Weekly from 1950, his writings and sermons challenged superficial faith, advocating holiness and simplicity. Married to Ada, they had seven children and lived modestly, never owning a car. His work remains influential, though he prioritized ministry over family life. Tozer’s passion for God’s presence shaped modern evangelical thought. His books, translated widely, continue to inspire spiritual renewal. He died of a heart attack, leaving a legacy of uncompromising devotion.
Download
Topic
Sermon Summary
In this sermon, the speaker reflects on a personal experience of arriving in San Francisco and being overwhelmed with love and patriotism for America. He then criticizes evangelicalism for its excessive focus on the judicial relationship with Jesus Christ and lack of emphasis on personal growth and perfection. The speaker highlights the importance of having a volitional, intellectual, and emotional relationship with Christ, and questions whether individuals truly love Jesus. He concludes by discussing the chains of love and fear that bind humanity and emphasizes the need to be free from earthly loves and fears by choosing the will of God.
Scriptures
Sermon Transcription
Now, this morning again, I want to talk on the deeper life, what it is, and how we may enter into it, and I have for a kind of text the first two verses of the sixth chapter of Hebrews. Therefore, leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection, not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God, of the doctrine of baptism from the laying on of hands, and the resurrection of the dead and of eternal judgment. That exhortation, let us go on unto perfection. Now, I wanted to, and have been, wanted to talk and have been talking about the deeper life, but I find that the expression is used to cover almost anything and everything. And I want it to be understood that by the words I do not mean a life deeper than the scripture indicates. I have said many times and repeat that I do not want anything that cannot be found within the framework of the revelation, the Christian revelation. I do not want anything that's added. I don't need it, I do not want it, I'm not interested in it. That is why I never buy books nor go listen to lectures on how to wake up your solar plexus and tune in to the cosmic process. All that is extra-scriptural, and any of it that's good is found in the word of God, and any that isn't in the word of God isn't good. So I let those fellows talk to people who don't know the word, and I stay by their word. I have said in conversations with people, in private conversations, that I am a Bible Christian, and that if an archangel with wings spread as broad as a constellation were to come and, shining like the sun, offer me some new truth, I'd ask him for a reference. And if he couldn't give it to me and couldn't show me where it's found in the Bible, I would bow him out and say, I'm awfully sorry, I don't bring any references with you. So what I'm talking about is not a life deeper than the scriptures indicate, but merely one that is in fact what it professes to be in name. Now a Christian isn't one who has been baptized, necessarily, though a Christian is likely to be baptized. A Christian is not one who receives the communion, either one or both, of the elements. A Christian may receive communion, and if he's been properly taught, will. But that is not a Christian, necessarily. A Christian is not one who has been born into a Christian home, though the chances are more likely that he will be a Christian if he has a good Christian background. A Christian is not one who has memorized the New Testament, or who is a great lover of a Christian song, or who goes to hear the Apollo Club sing Messiah every year. Now, a Christian may do all of those things, and I think it might be fine if he did. But that doesn't make a Christian. A Christian is one who sustains a right relation to Jesus Christ. Now, we enjoy, Christians enjoy, a kind of union with Jesus Christ, a right kind of union. Everybody sustains some relationship to Jesus Christ, but everybody has a relationship to everybody else, and everybody has a relation to Jesus Christ. You see, the relation he sustains may be one of adoring faith and love, it may be one of admiration, it may be one of hostility, it may be one of complete carelessness, but it's an attitude of some sort. A relationship of some sort exists between every human being and Jesus Christ. That is, every human being that ever heard of Jesus Christ. But a Christian is one who sustains a right and proper relation to Jesus Christ, a biblical relation to Christ, one that is right. And that Christian sustains two kinds of relationship, or rather, the union is two kinds. It's judicial and vital. I'll explain those two words. In Romans 5, we have the judicial relationship everybody sustains toward Christ, therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand and rejoice in hope of the glory of God. Then in the book of Ephesians, the first chapter, that very oft-quoted passage, he has blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ, according as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, and so on. Now, I only quote those not to give them exposition, but only to point out the fact that we sustain toward God in Christ a certain judicial relationship. Just as your son in the home has toward you a certain legal, judicial relationship. Being born into your family of your wife, you have legal obligations, and you can get in trouble with the law if you deny them. All law recognizes a certain right. The courts recognize that right. A relationship that is there between you and your son. It is not only the relationship of father to son biologically, it is a judicial relationship. You are accountable before the law not to neglecting, abusing, starving, or runaway and leaving. You've got to look after him as your son. Now there is a relationship which we sustain toward God in Christ. It is the relationship of son-children to the father. We are children of God. There are so many verses that deal with that that I don't need to quote any one of them. You as Bible students know that. Then there is a vital relationship which is another matter altogether. It is possible for a man to adopt a son. A husband and wife have no children, and after a lot of waiting around, they decide that they're going to adopt a boy. So they adopt that boy. Now, under law, he has exactly the same relationship to that man as if he were his own son. As the legal father before the law, he has the judicial relationship that makes him responsible for the care of that boy. He is responsible to feed and educate and bring up and shelter and care for that boy until he comes of a certain age, so that the relationship is judicial, that of father and son. But he has no vital relationship to that boy. He did not come from the long age old life stream of that father. He came from some other life stream and was adopted into the family. So he has a judicial but not a vital relationship to that son. But a Christian has a vital relationship to God and to Christ. He said, as I shall show tonight again, I am the vine and ye are the branches, and the branch is a branch because it sustains a vital relationship. The life of the vine is in the branch, and the life of the branch comes from the vine, and the two are united. That's a vital relationship. So that a Christian is one who has been judicially, legally, made a brother of Jesus Christ and a child of God. But he is more than that. He is one who has been vitally united to Jesus Christ by the power and motions of life, so that he is vitally, livingly related to Jesus Christ. That's where we begin, and my brothers and sisters, that's where almost everybody ends in our service. That's where almost everybody ends. So Bible schools and Bible conferences and books and printing houses all are dedicated to the constant repetition of the fact that we are judicially and vitally related to Christ in salvation. And that's as far as we go. But there are other relationships which we can also bear toward Christ, and that's what the writer meant in Hebrews when he said, Let us go on unto perfection. And that's what it was meant in the 1 Corinthians 3, when the men of God told them that they were carnal and that they ought to move on out of that carnal state into a spiritual state. There are at least three other relationships that everybody ought to bear toward Jesus Christ. Not only the one that you entered into when you believed on Christ and were born again judicially, and not only the volitional one which you entered when you were born again, for that's how you entered, but there are three others, volitional, intellectual, and emotional. And I want to talk about these relationships, this kind of union with Christ. I say that our union is judicial and vital. It's that by virtue of our faith in Christ. But there is a volitional relationship, too. And what do I mean by that? It's not as bad as it sounds. I know we preachers have a way of making things awful, and then it takes ten minutes to get the people's minds back again. By volitional I mean that relationship of our will to God, so that every known will of God should be mine. Every known will of God. Everything that God wills, I should will. So that I will not only be judicially, legally related to him, not only vitally related to him in life, but that I will in my mind, in my volitional life, be united to him by doing and knowing and willing exactly as he does. Now, that's what I mean by let us go on. Most Christians do not go on to make all the will of God their will. They sing very tenderly, that rather dubrious and pretty little ditty, O sweet will of God, still bind me closer. I like that, too, don't get me wrong. I like to hear it once every year or so. But, O will of God, still bind me closer. We can sing that and have moist eyes, and yet be selfish and self-willed and not make the will of God our own. The will of God must be known, and then must be adopted as my will. And then I begin to sustain a relationship of will, a volitional relationship toward Jesus Christ. How do I know the will of God? By listening to stories told by preachers? No. How do I know the will of God? I know by prayer, by the Bible study, and by experience. I go to the scriptures and I read it regularly. I go to prayer and I ask God for grace to help me to understand it. You know that song, Break Thou the Bread of Life? We have it in three stanzas in our book, but I read it in the Baptist hymn book this morning. I had it propped up while I was eating my gruel and looking at it, and I find there's another verse in there. I do not recall verbatim wording of it, but that third or fourth stanza of that hymn prays that the Holy Ghost might enlighten the word so we can understand it. That's the part we don't sing. I don't think there was any sinister in that. They just have to make room so they chop verses. Or stanzas, and they chop that one. Well, my brethren, I believe that the writer Break Thou the Bread of Life knew what she was writing about when she said, Give thou the Spirit, Lord, dear Lord, to me, that the Lord might give the Holy Ghost as a light upon the scriptures. So if we pray and have the Spirit of God give us illumination and we read the word of God with avidity and relish, and then we watch our spiritual experiences, we'll soon begin to crystallize within us a will that is God's will. I wonder if that's what Jesus meant when he said, But ye have the mind of Christ. There is a mind, there is a set of an infinite number of attitudes and relationships within the heart, and these are all wrong to start with, and they don't all get corrected when we get converted, either. They don't all get corrected after we've been to Bible school. They get corrected only by working on them, by prayer, by study, by spiritual experience, by the illumination of the Holy Ghost, whose attitudes begin to become spiritual instead of carnal. They begin to get right, straightened out. Then there is a second relationship that I would mention to go on to, and that is an intellectual relationship to Jesus Christ. Now, of course, there is a sense in which devolution of the intellectual comes as soon as we're converted, but there is another one, a sense in which they do not but wait development and growth. So by the intellectual, I mean that we should think the way Jesus Christ thinks, that we should think scripturally, that we should see things the way the Lord Jesus sees them, that we should learn to feel the way the Lord Jesus feels about anything or anybody, that we should love what he loves and hate what he hates. Now, some of your hackles will get up here and you will say, Mr. Tozer, do you think God hates anything? Sure, I do. He says so. "...thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity. Therefore, though God thy Godhead anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy pellets." It is a psychological impossibility to love anything without hating its opposite. If I love holiness, I hate sin. If I love truth, I hate lies. If I love honesty, I hate dishonesty. If I love purity, I hate filth. Can't help that. Don't think that's bad. Hate is only bad when it's aimed against people, made in the image of God, or when it springs out of some unworthy or low-motive like jealousy or envy or anger. But we should learn to hate what Jesus hates, and I'm sure that if we had the mind of Christ intellectually so that we judged things the way he judges them, that there would be less need for preaching separation from the world than there is today among the Christians. Talking about getting the mind of Christ and having the intellect sanctified, I will talk again about two men. I think I gave this either on the air or here at the church within recent months, but you can open a window any time to get light, and this is an illustration. They tell me that there were in England two men, both of them Englishmen, Keats and Milton. In my earlier Christian life I read them a great deal. Then I got away from Keats. I still admire him very greatly for the marvelous music of his poetry, but there's nothing of God in it, nothing of Christ. So I don't find it very helpful anymore. Milton of course would be all right. I think we'll read Milton ahead. But here's what the critics said about these two men. They said, Keats was an Englishman, born of English stock, reared in England, and I think never left England, and died when he was in his twenties, an Englishman of the Englishmen. But that Keats had read Greek literature so much that he had developed a Greek mind, and that his mind was not an English mind. It had nothing of the restrictions and strengths and weaknesses of the British mind at all. It was a Greek mind. He thought like the Greeks. Then they said of Milton. Milton was an Englishman, born English of the English, lived in England all his life, or perhaps a few trips abroad, but not many. He lived and died in England, and is one of the second of all the great English poets. Yet they said Milton read the Bible so much, memorized it so much, and lived in it so much, that he was a Hebrew in his heart, and that Milton had a Bible mind, and that it got into everything he wrote. He couldn't knock off a common sonnet, fourteen lines, but what somewhere in it would be the rilton rhythm of the Hebrew melodies. Older New Testament, as I understand the New Testament was written in Greek, I also understand that it's Hebrew in its thought pattern. Now, there we have two minds, both of them English, living in the same country, and eating the same kind of foods, and seeing the same scenery, and having the same kind of basic education. And yet one of them became a Greek in everything but nationality, because he loved Greeks so much. The other became Hebrew, Bible as in Hebrew, because he loved the Bible so much. That's what I mean. That illustrates it at You can have a Christian mind, a Bible mind. You can be Bible-minded in the sense that it is not George Washington, or even Abraham Lincoln incidentally. We bow to the fact he was born on this state. Or Benjamin Franklin, or any of the rest of them. Not Longfellow, or Whittier, or Byron, and certainly not Whitman. But the New Testament, even though you're an American, you have a New Testament mind. I believe that that's what the Holy Ghost wants to do for us. I believe that he wants our intellectual relationship to Jesus Christ to become so close, so intimate, so all-embracing, that we'll think as Jesus thought, I say, and love as he loved, and hate what he hated, and value what he valued, and have the mind of Christ in us. And that doesn't come by believing on Jesus Christ, buying a Schofield Bible and singing choruses. Brother, you've got to go beyond. Let us go on. Those things are all basically sound and right and good, and I have no objection. Stick by your Schofield Bible. It's good. And it did, in the early part of this century, wonderful yeoman service in helping us stand against liberalism and modernism. But it has its limitations. Its limitations consist of an excessive emphasis upon the judicial relationship to Jesus Christ, and very little about going on unto perfection. But that's the same criticism that I bring against most of evangelicalism today. So I say, there's a volitional and an intellectual relationship to Jesus Christ which we Christians should go on to covet. Then thirdly, there is an emotional relationship, that is, a love attachment to Christ. Do you love the Lord Jesus Christ really? Do you really love him not? Now, I know we sing that we do, and we sing things that aren't very true sometimes. Do you really love Christ? A half-comical answer given to Moody one time when he inquired of a man on the street, Do you love Jesus? He answered, I have nothing against you. And I think that is above as far as a lot of people We have nothing against Jesus. But to say we love him, ask the young mother with a three-month-old baby, just maybe howling with its first little tooth, and able to smile all over its face when it looks up at its parents. Ask the mother, Do you love your baby? You know what will happen? She'll break out, and every inch of her face will wrinkle up into a smile. Of course she does. Do you love your baby? Sure. Of our Alliance missionary who had been in China a long, long time. His name was Jacobson. He's retired now. He had been in China, oh, I don't know how long years ago. There, while in China, children were born to them. Then they just were sent home. They came home by way of the west coast to San Francisco. At every port of call, the children would say, Is this America, David? Is this America? No, he'd say, This isn't America. This isn't America. And after three or four such disappointing incidents, he said, Set of sun. The boat came in to the harbor of San Francisco, and there they saw the golden gates. Some of you have seen the golden gates of San Francisco. And he said, Way there was the shoreline of two peaks, with the sun shining down bright on them. They stood on the deck and looked, and the little children said, Daddy, is this America? He said, Suddenly you went into all the pieces, and let himself go in a welfare of homesickness and patriotism and love and memories, and said through his sobs, Yes, yes, children, this is America. He didn't know how much he loved her. He didn't know how dear her rocks and rills, her woods and temple hills had been to his American heart until he'd been shut away there so long, in his first sight of his homeland. Broke him all up so he cried like the child that he was for a moment. Ask that man, Do you love America? He'll grin at you sheepishly and tell you that story. Yes, he loves America. Do you love Jesus, really? Well, I think it's possible to be a Christian, that is, to have faith in his power and his work and his atonement. I think it's possible even to have a vital relation to him in the new birth, and yet not have cultivated his fellowship to a point where we love him very much. We're not done yet, we're not finished until the love attachment to Christ has become so strong that it burns and glows and consumes. And I read the writings of the old mystics and the old devotional writings and hymn writers of the Middle Ages and later. I get sick in my heart and I tell God, I tell him, I tell him, God, I'm sorry, I apologize and I'm ashamed. I don't love thee the way these love thee. Read the writings, read the letters of Samuel Rutherford. If you haven't, you should. Read those letters and then see how sick it will make you. You fold that book shut and get down on your knees, very likely, and say, Lord Jesus, do I love thee at all, considering that this was love, then what have I, what have I got? No, there should be an emotional relationship to Jesus Christ, a relationship of love. God has left thy first love, said the Lord Jesus, and maybe that's what it means, that you've allowed things to cool you off. So like the young husband who really loves his bride, but he's so busy making a living for her that he neglects her. And I wonder if Jesus might not have had something like that in mind. You're busy for me, you're dashing here and there in my service, but oh, you've left your first love. Right here I ought to break this off, but I won't because I'll not be preaching next Sunday here. Now, what is this Christian, then, who has gone on until he sustains toward our Lord a right, a scriptural, a spirit-inspired, volitional and intellectual and emotional attitude toward the Savior? Well, he is one who has been freed from earthly loves and fears. I want you to put that down. He is one who has been released from earthly loves and fears. What do I mean by earthly love? I mean any love out of the will of God, any love that we would not allow God to take away. If you have anything in this world or any body in this world that you would not let God take away from you, then you don't love him as you should, and you don't know anything about the deeper life and experience. For the deeper spiritual Christian life means that I am delivered from earthly loves to a point where there is no love that I would not allow Jesus Christ to take away, be it money, be it reputation, be it my home, be it my friends, be it my family, whatever it may be. There is nothing. The love of Jesus Christ has come in and swallowed up all other loves and sanctified them, purified them, made them holy, and put them in their right relationship to that all-consuming love of God, so that they're secondary and never primary. If there's anything... Now think with me a little bit. You believe you will attend the Alliance Church, and you believe you know something about the deeper things of God. All right, I want to ask you this question. Is there anything or body on earth that you love so much that you'd fight God if God wanted to take it? Then you are not where you should be, and we might as well face up to it and not pretend to be something we're not. Complete freedom means that I want the will of God on me, and if it's the will of God for me to have these things, then I love them for his sake. But I love them with a tentative and relative love, not with an all-poured-out love that binds me as slave. It means that I love nothing outside the will of God, and that I love only what and who he wills that I should love. And you can love everybody. I think Paul loved Timothy and Silas and Titus and the rest of them with a love that glowed like a furnace. But he didn't love them to a point where he couldn't separate from them or where he would fight God for them. He only loved them in the margin of his heart. He loved God at the center, and he loved them for God's dear sake. This Christianity, you say, you mean to tell me that I'm not to love my baby? No, I mean to tell you that you're to love God so much that you love your baby in its right context. You mean to say I'm not to love my husband? No, you're to love him, but you're to love him in right context, in right relationship. My old mother-in-law had a baby that died, and she was going through fire and water and blood and tears and toil, I'll tell you, and coming through to a wonderful spiritual experience. She had to sit up in bed, weak and weary as she was, and make the baby's coffee. The husband made it out of wood. She made not silk, but whatever she could get ahold of to line it. So great was the, not poverty maybe, but at least they weren't rich. And when the funeral was held, she stood by the grave of the rest, and when everybody was expecting her to break down, she said, Shall we sing together? And she let off in the doxology. Some people went away and said, Mrs. Faust is insane. Others went away with moist eyes and said, There's faith and love. There's faith and love that can give her newborn to the grave, and sing praise to God for whom all blessings flow beside that grave. If you love anything enough that there's any question about whether God can have it or not, you know nothing about the deeper life. You're a slave. You're a slave to that love, whatever it is. So if we've been freed from every earthly love, then we have no unsatisfied longings, and we have no wishes and no dreams. I never used the word wish, never. Years ago, I quit it. And if it ever breaks out in my speech or preaching, it's only colloquialism. I never mean it. Wish is something I never use. If God wants me to have it, I'll pray for it. And if he doesn't want me to have it, I don't want it. Now, earthly fears. The Christian who goes on gets freed from earthly fears. I was thinking of this the other day. I still think a little at times. And I was thinking, you know, those two chains bind the whole human race, loves and fears. We love something and can't get it. Or we love something and we're afraid we're going to lose it, so we're bound with that chain. Or we're afraid we'll get something we don't want. We're afraid we'll lose something we have, we're bound with that chain. Fear and love binds humanity in two golden chains. And the gospel of Jesus Christ never is finished until it goes on to set us free from loves and fears. We'll love our family more than we ever loved them before. We'll love our country with cheerful devotion. We'll love every good thing there is in the world, but we'll love it in its right context, and we'll love it for Jesus' sake. And we'll love it and hold it this way so we can let go of it any second for the Lord's sake. That's to be free from earthly loves. Free from earthly fears means that I choose the will of God now and forever. It's my treasure. It's my whole beatitude. The only fear I have is the fear to get out of the will of God, and that won't bother me any. It won't bother me. Outside of the will of God, there's nothing I want. And in the will of God, there's nothing I fear. For God has sworn to keep me in his will. If I'm out of his will, that's another matter. But if I'm in his will, he's sworn to keep me. And he's able to do it. He's wise enough to know how to do it. And he's kind enough to want to do it. So really, there's nothing to fear. I get cheated around with my family and friends by the Maccafee, especially he likes to do it. But I don't really think I'm afraid of anything. Somebody says, "'Ed, but you'll die of cancer.'" Maybe so. I'm going to have to hurry up, though. I'll die of old age first. But I'm not too badly worried, because a man who dies of cancer in the will of God, he isn't injured. He's just dead. He isn't injured. You can't harm a man in the will of God. If old Socrates, a heathen stoic, could die saying, "'No harm can come to a good man in this world or the next.' If he could see it, a pagan, why should I tremble and walk softly through this world, looking over my shoulder furtively? Rather, should I by the grace of God say, "'Lord, I believe at least as much as a pagan. I believe no harm can come to a good man in this world or the next. But I'll lose my job.'" Well, you'll lose your job, then. You won't lose your head. But if you, "'I'll lose my head.' Well, if you lose your head, you won't lose your savior. You can't harm a good man. So a man gets free from fear. I pity the preacher that's afraid of his congregation or afraid of his superiors and his denominations. Maybe I'm a little abnormal on that, but I never knew up to now so help me God one single twinge of fear of my superiors. And only rarely do I ever get self-conscious before a congregation. If there's somebody who really is a great preacher present, and I know that my poor little sermon will sound rather amateurish by comparison, and I sometimes don't care to preach before great preachers, but I'm not afraid of him. I'm just, what would you say, a child. But nothing can harm you if you're in the will of God, so that if you'll do these two things, let the love of God burn and burn within you until it consumes everything, then you will never be a slave to any earthly yearnings. You will have them, and you will have earthly loves, and you will have people you love and care for and would weep to part with Jesus wept beside the grave of his loved friend Lazarus. There's no harm in weeping when we must say goodbye. And you can have your dislikes. I'd run a mile to keep from having a needle put in my arm. A fellow came clear out the house one time from somewhere around over the city, I don't know where. Somebody sent for him, I don't know who, McAfee, I guess. He said, come out and see me. Well, he came out. And he came up the terrace to my room and sat down beside my bed. He was a heart specialist. And when he came in, he had this huge rocket in his hand. It was a long sucker affair, and I saw it. And brother did I argue him down. And he said, no, I'll give you this and you'll sleep and you'll be all right. It'll just be a sedative. And I said, you won't give me that. And he said, well, if you're going to make so much of it, probably you'll be worse off if you took it. So he said, goodbye and left. And I go, all right. So I don't say that the deeper life, the spirit-filled life, means that you won't be normally human. If the lightning strikes near you, you'll jump. And if somebody comes at you with a needle, you'll shrink. You're human. But that's one thing. It's quite another thing to walk around chained by human fears. Chained by the fears of death and the fear of sickness and the fear of poverty and the fear of friends and the fear of enemies. God never means that these children should thus be afraid. Well, all that I've preached to you now isn't a dream. It isn't a misty ideal that nobody can reach. It's the normal Christian life. And anything short of it is abnormal or subnormal. Shall we not obey God and go on to perfection? I believe you'll want to, or I wouldn't be preaching to you. May God grant that together we may press on out into the deep waters, gay waters to swim.
The Deeper Life - Part 2
- Bio
- Summary
- Transcript
- Download

A.W. Tozer (1897 - 1963). American pastor, author, and spiritual mentor born in La Jose, Pennsylvania. Converted to Christianity at 17 after hearing a street preacher in Akron, Ohio, he began pastoring in 1919 with the Christian and Missionary Alliance without formal theological training. He served primarily at Southside Alliance Church in Chicago (1928-1959) and later in Toronto. Tozer wrote over 40 books, including classics like "The Pursuit of God" and "The Knowledge of the Holy," emphasizing a deeper relationship with God. Self-educated, he received two honorary doctorates. Editor of Alliance Weekly from 1950, his writings and sermons challenged superficial faith, advocating holiness and simplicity. Married to Ada, they had seven children and lived modestly, never owning a car. His work remains influential, though he prioritized ministry over family life. Tozer’s passion for God’s presence shaped modern evangelical thought. His books, translated widely, continue to inspire spiritual renewal. He died of a heart attack, leaving a legacy of uncompromising devotion.