- Home
- Speakers
- David Gooding
- The Lords Supper
The Lords Supper
David Gooding

David Gooding (September 16, 1925 – August 30, 2019) was a British preacher, scholar, and author whose ministry focused on biblical exposition and teaching within evangelical circles, particularly among the Plymouth Brethren. Born in Ipswich, England, to a family of six children, he lost his mother at age nine and later cared for his aging father. He studied Classics at Trinity College, Cambridge, earning a B.A. in 1950 and an M.A. in 1954, followed by a Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge in 1955 with a dissertation on the Greek Deuteronomy. He served as a lecturer and reader in Classics at Queen’s University Belfast from 1959 to 1979, becoming Professor of Old Testament Greek in 1979 and Professor of Greek in 1983 until his retirement in 1986, when he was named Professor Emeritus. Elected to the Royal Irish Academy in 1977, he combined academic rigor with spiritual insight. Gooding’s preaching career spanned decades, marked by his international teaching ministry and lectures on the Bible’s relevance to philosophy and world religions. Active in a Gospel Assembly in Belfast, he preached widely, delivering sermons that explored both Old and New Testaments, such as his series on James at Risedale Gospel Hall in 1991. His expositions, including works like According to Luke (1987) and The Riches of Divine Wisdom (2013), translated into over 25 languages, emphasized Christ-centered interpretation and practical faith. Co-authoring with John Lennox, he influenced post-Soviet Christian literature in Russia and Ukraine. Unmarried, he died at age 93 in Belfast, leaving a legacy of scholarly yet accessible preaching preserved through Myrtlefield House and Gospel Folio Press.
Download
Topic
Sermon Summary
In this sermon, the speaker focuses on the institution of the Lord's Supper, which is central to the Christian faith. He reads four passages from the Bible, two from the Gospels and two from the Epistles, to support his discussion. The speaker emphasizes the importance of the Lord's Supper and compares it to a last chance to show love, using the example of giving a gift to a loved one who is about to die. He also mentions that the Lord's Supper is one of the two ordinances left by Jesus and highlights its significance in the Christian faith.
Scriptures
Sermon Transcription
The last few sentences of this recording are missing, but unfortunately it came to us second hand and we are therefore unable to do anything about it. I would choose to speak on something that is central to our Christian faith and fundamental thereto. Something that stands very near to the affections which every Christian bears towards our Lord Jesus Christ. I have chosen therefore to think with you about the institution of our Lord's supper. I propose to read four passages relevant to this topic, two from the Gospels and two from the Epistles. Our first reading is found in Matthew's Gospel chapter 26, Matthew's Gospel chapter 26 verse 1. I happen to be reading from the revised version. It came to pass, when Jesus had finished all these words, he said unto his disciples, ye know that after two days the Passover cometh, and the Son of Man is delivered up to be crucified. Then were gathered together the chief priests and the elders of the people unto the court of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas. They took counsel together that they might take Jesus by subtlety and kill him. But they said not during the feast, lest a tumult arise among the people. Now when Jesus was in Bethany in the house of Simon the leper, there came unto him a woman having an alabaster cruise of exceeding precious ointment and poured it upon his head as he sat at meat. When the disciples saw it they had indignation saying, to what purpose is this waste? For this ointment might have been sold for much and given to the poor. But Jesus perceiving it said unto them, why trouble ye the woman? For she hath wrought a good work upon me. For ye have the poor always with you, but me ye have not always. For in that she poured this ointment upon my body, she did it to prepare me for burial. Verily I say unto you, wheresoever this gospel shall be preached in the whole world, that also which this woman hath done shall be spoken of for a memorial of her. Then one of the twelve who was called Judas went unto the chief priests and said, what are you willing to give me? And I will deliver him unto you. They weighed unto him thirty pieces of silver. From that time he sought opportunity to deliver him unto them. Now on the first day of unleavened bread the disciples came to Jesus saying, where wilt thou that we make ready for thee to eat the Passover? And he said, go into the city to such a man and say unto him, the master saith, my time is at hand, I keep the Passover at thy house with my disciple. And the disciples did as Jesus appointed them. And they made ready the Passover. Now when even was come he was sitting at meat with the twelve disciples and as they were eating he said, verily I say unto you that one of you shall betray me. And they were exceeding sorrowful and began to say unto him every one, is it I Lord? But he answered and said, he that dipped his hand with me in the dish, the same shall betray me. The Son of Man goeth even as it is written of him, but woe unto that man through whom the Son of Man is betrayed. Good were it for that man if he had not been born. Judas which betrayed him answered and said, is it I Rabbi? He saith unto him, thou hast sinned. And as they were eating Jesus took bread and blessed and break it and he gave it to the disciples and said, take eat, this is my body. And he took a cup and gave thanks and gave to them saying, drink ye all of it. This is my blood of the covenant which is shed for many unto remission of sin. But I say unto you I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine until the day when I drink it new with you in my father's kingdom. So stands Matthew's account of the institution of the Lord's Son. And the three other, two other accounts in the gospels naturally follow Matthew very closely. In turning now to Luke's account I merely wish to pick out certain salient points that Luke has which Matthew has not. The account of course is found in chapter 22. Verse 24 of Matthew 22. There arose also a contention among them, which of them is accounted to be greatest? And he said unto them, the kings of the Gentiles have lordship over them and they that have authority over them are called benefactors. But ye shall not be so. But he that is the greater among you, let him become as the younger. And he that is chief as he that does serve. For where there is greater, he that sitteth at meat or he that serve, is not he that sitteth at meat. But I am in the midst of you as he that serve. But ye are they which have continued with me in my temptations. And I point unto your kingdom even as my father appointed unto me that ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom. And ye shall sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel. Simon, Simon, behold Satan asked to have you that he might sift you as wheat. But I have prayed for thee that thy faith fail not. And do thou, when once thou hast turned again, establish thy brethren. And he said unto him, Lord, with thee I am ready to go both to prison and to death. And he said, I tell thee, Peter, the cock shall not crow this day until thou shall deny thrice that thou know'st me. And he said unto them, when I sent you forth without purse and wallet and shoes, lacked ye anything? And they said, nothing. And he said unto them, but now he that hath a purse, let him take it. And likewise a wallet. And he that hath none, let him sell his cloak and buy a sword. For I say unto you that this which is written must be fulfilled in me. And he was reckoned with the transgressors. For that which concerneth me hath fulfillment. And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords. And he said unto them, it is enough. Now let us leave the Gospels for a moment and turn to the first epistle to the Corinthians. First of all in chapter 10. First epistle to the Corinthians in chapter 10, verse 16. The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not a communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not a communion of the body of Christ? Seeing that we who are many are one bread, one body. For we all partake of the one bread. Behold Israel after the flesh, have not they which eat the sacrifices, communion with the altar? What say I then, that a thing sacrificed to idols is anything? Or that an idol is anything? But I say that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils and not to God. And I would not that ye should have communion with devils. He cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of devils. He cannot partake of the table of the Lord and of the table of devils. Or do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? Or are we stronger than he? Finally from chapter 11 of this same epistle, verse 23. For I received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, how that the Lord Jesus, in the night in which he was betrayed, took bread. And when he had given thanks, he breaketh and said, this is my body, which is for you. This do in remembrance of me. In like manner also the cup, after supper, saying, this cup is the new covenant in my blood, this do as after ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread and drink the cup, ye proclaim the Lord's death till he come. Wherefore, whosoever shall eat the bread or drink the cup of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord. But let a man prove himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For he that eateth and drinketh, eateth and drinketh judgment unto himself, if he deserve not the body. For this cause many among you are weak and sickly, and not a few sleep. But if we discerned ourselves, we should not be judged. But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we may not be condemned with the world. Wherefore, my brethren, when ye come together to eat, wait one for another. If any man is hungry, let him eat at home. But your coming together, be not unto judgment. The Lord himself draw near, and expound to us his holy word. Our Lord left us only two ordinances, which therefore become remarkable by their very fewness of number, and concentrate our attention on their singular importance. He left us the ordinance of baptism, the ordinance of the Lord's Supper. And so tonight, as we survey together the familiar theme of the Lord's Supper, inevitably, we shall constantly think of its importance. For this is a something that our Lord asked us to do. A something very rare that our Lord asked us to do. Rare in the sense that it is one of only two ordinances. But in addition to perceiving its importance, we shall I trust be helped of God to see the wisdom which lies behind our Lord's injunction. It is a lovely thing for every believer when he is given to see the wisdom of God behind God's gracious commands. It goes without saying, of course, that we owe to our Lord, unquestioning obedience to every one of his commands, even if we cannot perceive the wisdom behind them. Suppose we cannot see the reason why. Ours is not to question. Ours to do. Trusting the heart of him who loves us. Trusting the mind of an all wise Saviour and God. But how lovely when God treats us not as infants, merely to be commanded without understanding why, but rather as grown up sons to whom he may entrust his secrets and explain his ways that we might perceive their wisdom and with all the more wholeheartedness cooperate with him in the carrying out of his instructions. Let us then by God's grace see tonight the importance of this ordinance and also its exceeding wisdom. I want then first to say a few words on our Lord's supper from the historical viewpoint, to see what we may learn from its very institution. For I shall submit to you that it shows us, what is and whatever must be, the prime and central Christian emphasis. But let us reflect a moment that when our Lord instituted this thing, he was instituting a something by which we should remember him. How many things there were about him that we love and which he might have chosen by which he should remember him. There were all those wonderful miracles that he did, full of grace and kindness every one of them. But we do notice that it is not his miracle that here he bids us recall by this constantly repeated rite. And again we think how lovely were his teachings, how glorious those parables he taught, how striking and how gripping his moral teachings. And yet we cannot fail to notice that when he wanted something to be done to recall him, he didn't order us to stand publicly and recite his parables, that we might remember what he said in those parables, or to recite publicly the sermon on the mount that we might remember his ethical teaching. He chose to select this from all his life and ministry. He chose to select something that should recall the offering of himself as a sacrifice for our sins, bread and wine. His body given and his wine, his blood given for us, expressly said, given for us for the forgiveness of sin. We cannot of course think that this is some casual thing that our Lord did without forethought or deliberate intention. It must be that in asking us to do this which recalls his sacrifice and death, that our Lord wished to imprint it as the central thing in the whole of Christianity. This is it. This the thing that lies nearest the Lord's heart. This the most important thing that we are to gather about all that he said and ever did, this. We should remember that he gave his body a sacrifice and shed his blood for the forgiveness of human sin. I want to submit to you that herein we may perceive our Lord's wisdom in this provision for his church. A glance back at the history of the Christian church will show us that there have been days when the church has not seen too clearly what was its main emphasis. Days when the church felt that its main task was a program of social reform, that his message to the world was a message for the improvement socially of the masses or for the political setting up and putting down of kings. Days there have been many. When the church has spoken to the world as though the main thing in Christianity were its rules and regulations, the church has bid the world to try and keep the golden rule. Now that we are exhorted to do good works unto all men and should have a care for our neighbor, this is transparently clear in the New Testament. But these, I venture to say, are not the central thing in Christianity. The central thing about Christianity is the thing which is unique among all religions of us, that our Lord was a savior, come to die for human sin, that sin might be forgiven, man might be put right with God. Happy the church who was allowed the constant celebration of this central thing of Christianity, to imprint upon its mind that this is the fundamental thing. Should we forget all else, then we must remember this, preach it with all our powers. Our Lord came as a sacrifice for sin. My brother, if you have a heart for the souls of men, yield not to this world's incessant clamor, suggesting that you would make a bigger impact on the world if you dropped these mysterious things and got on with social reform. But my brother, listen rather to the Lord's will. Let him by this institution imprint upon our minds that this is the message of Christianity. This is the thing by which we remember Christ, this pre-eminently, what he came to do, not to relieve men's poverty necessarily, but to die for their sin, bring man and put him right with God. We have lived to see a day when in the name of Christ and Christian theology there are many who would preach to us that our Lord's divinity is atoning death, his bodily resurrection, that these are ideas that exist, that originated with the Church and were not taught by our Lord himself. Liberal scholars will call our attention to the fact that the records that we have in the Gospels of what our Lord said and did are records compiled years after our Lord went back to heaven, compiled by the Church. They will argue to us and say, but look, Jesus himself never claimed divinity, it was the Church who claimed divinity for him. As looking back over the years and remembering him, his wisdom and his teaching, infectionately they put a halo of divinity round his head, and thinking to honour him, gave him the status of Godhead. But that was the Church, they will tell you, who wrote the Gospels, not our Lord, who wrote nothing. His atoning death? Say they again, this is not what our Lord intended by his death at all. His death was to show us how we ought to deny self and say to God, not my will but thine be done. But if you please, they will tell us there came later apostles and notably Saul of Tarsus, with a mind soaked in Judaism and its Old Testament sacrifices, and alas, the liberals will tell us, men like Paul went and spoiled the whole thing by interpreting the death of Christ in the light of Old Testament sacrifices, suggesting to us that God needed blood and fire before he could forgive his erring children. And say our liberal theologians, you see, that's not what Christ taught, that's what the apostles taught, that's what the Church taught. When we come to the glorious fact of the resurrection, how could they say it's not a fact at all, not really, it's only a belief. Say there you mustn't believe that the bones literally came out of the grave, that's not what our Lord meant at all. He meant that if you were willing to say no to flesh, to crucify self, you would find new life in your experience of God, and that's all he meant. But those later Christians made a fable out of it, made a myth out of it, whereas our Lord only meant that we should find, by being willing to crucify self, we should find greater life in experience of God. They misunderstood it and thought he meant that he was going to literally, physically rise again from the dead. And if you haven't come across those kind of theories, then don't. How wise of God, who foresees the end from the beginning, that our Lord himself, before he died upon the cross, years before the first gospel was written, or the first epistle penned, our Lord himself should have instituted a ceremony that gives the lie to all these liberal fancies. But we shall observe that whereas Matthew and Luke are written sometime after our Lord's ascension to heaven, recording for us the details of the institution of the supper, the supper itself was instituted by Christ before he died, and was celebrated from the very word go in the Christian church. It stands as the earliest record we have of what our Lord came, and what our Lord taught about himself, and his work. From Pentecost day onward, if not before, as little groups of Christian men and women gathered together, there they enacted a record that the Lord himself told them to enact. And you will observe that that record contains what is vital to true Christianity. Our Lord's atoning death, my body given, my blood poured, specifically said for the remission of sin. Specifically described as the blood of the new covenant, and long before there was ever a book called the New Testament, Christians met to celebrate the New Testament. For the New Testament is not this book you'll know, the New Testament. The Testament, the covenant that Christ performed and secured for us when he died, whereof the symbol is the bread and the wine of which we partake at the Lord's supper. This is the blood of the New Testament. Not only did he claim before he died that he was going to die for human sin, but implied in that claim is inevitably the claim to divinity, to deity. What ordinary human could claim to come and die as a sacrifice for the sins of the world? What sane man would ever breathe any such notion? Moses in his highest flights of oratory, never dreamed of making any such claim. And Isaiah in his own ministry, for himself never once expressed any such notion. There's only one who being sane and commanding men's respect, ever claimed he had come to die for the sins of the whole world. For the very claim implies he was more than man, yea God incarnate. For only God incarnate could offer a satisfactory sacrifice for sin. Do we not perceive that that very claim that he was about to die for human sin, involves the claim that he rose again? For he ever and anon said it thus, that he would be delivered, crucified, and the third day rise again. Indeed if he be not risen, as a later apostle said, we are still in our sins. He is not God's son and of all men we are the most miserable. I would like now to point out how Matthew, in his record of the supper, goes out of his way to demonstrate to us that the idea of the atoning death of Christ, enshrined here in the Lord's supper, is not an idea that originated with the church, not even an idea that originated with the apostles, but an idea that originated with Christ. See how Matthew does it. Passover was coming, Passover on which Christ should die, and our Lord said that the Pharisees would want to take him, but that he himself, and determined to die on the Passover, only a few hours distant now in time, and he came with his followers to a certain house of Simon, and there they made him an ordinary supper, during the course of which a woman anointed his head and feet with ointment. He gave rise to severe criticism, said the disciples one and all, what a waste of money, all that money poured out and lost just on one occasion. Our Lord defended the woman and said something remarkable, said he, she has wrought a good work, the poor you have always, me you have not always, in that she has done this, she has anointed me for my burial, I suggest to you it descended upon them like a thunderclap, burial, burial, the evidence as I read it suggests that those apostles, for all that Christ had said, were not really expecting him to die, for had they been expecting him to die, had they had the slightest notion that this was the last occasion ever on which they might have the opportunity to express their gratitude to him, they would have given him anything, wouldn't they? Or do you sir think that those apostles were meaner than you are? Well come now, you wouldn't think of spending every month perhaps on your wife, a new dress, a mink overcoat, you would say yeah, well yes I do love a good woman but you know 450 pounds every month, I mean isn't that a bit stiff, wherefore this waste, the money might have been yes, given to the poor or something hey, or well no not that, put in your car maybe or something, but 450 pounds on my wife every month, ah yes, I suppose one dark day the doctor said to you that your wife has only two months to live, it would do her good maybe, at any rate it can do her no harm, if you gave her a cruise in the Mediterranean sir, if it were your last chance to show your love, would you grudge the 450 if you had it, it being the last and you knowing at the last opportunity, would you write off Peter and John and James as so impossibly mean, that they would have grudged our Lord that token, that tribute if they had realised that almost tomorrow he would be dead, no they thought they had him always, no says Christ the poor you have always, but you see gentlemen you've forgotten haven't you, that you're not having me always, they weren't even expecting him to die so soon, after you say they found out, as our Lord told them and when they found out of course they said ah yes now we see, ah yes of course that's what the Old Testament said, yes and he's going to die for sin, now we shall help him to get arrested, we shall do everything in our power so, and they fell into the scheme and they said this would be a good thing, we hadn't thought of that before, now if only we could get our Lord crucified by the Jews, we could tell the people he had fulfilled Isaiah's prophecy, hi this is a scheme this, and this will prove to them that he's Messiah, so Peter, so John, I fancy not, they went out into the night and slept while our Lord prayed, and presently there came the squad to arrest him, manfully Peter drew his sword, surprised that the Lord did nothing, and then to his utter dismay was told Peter put up your sword into its place, what was this, bold men prepared to give their last drop of blood to save him from dying, knowing the disappointment of a zeal that would have given everything only now to be repulsed and said no, I don't want it Peter, who wants it, you're not going to stand there and let, let them take you are they says Peter, don't you know what they're going to do to you, if they get their hands on you, they're not going to stand there just like that and let them take you, they said our Lord but then you see Peter, I could if I wanted call for 12 legions of angel each with a sword you know, then how should the scripture be fulfilled, what scripture, why that thus it must be that I must be taken and die, oh said Peter, oh said John, oh said James, and oh said they all, oh well if that's your idea that isn't ours, goodbye, then all his disciples forsook him and fled, for the Messiah that willingly gave himself up to his enemies to die, that wasn't in all their theological vocabulary, it is sheer nonsense to say the idea originated with the church, let's finally look at the very chiefest of the apostles Peter himself, for when the others ran he came back and entered the judgment hall where our Lord was on trial before the religious authorities, he went to see the end, what would this Jesus of Nazareth do now, here was a situation if ever you saw one, now if he had resisted the squad of soldiers and done a miracle and called angels to deliver him, then there was some sense in claiming to be the Son of God, but for a man who lamely gave himself up like that and let himself be overpowered and taken into the judgment hall, well now he better be careful, they're bent on getting evidence to crucify him, and if he dare squeak now about being God's Son and Messiah they'll have his head, Peter listens with bated breath, as the high priest at last challenges the prisoner himself, are you then the Son of the Blessed, I think I see Peter tremble in his shoes, whatever will he say now, now he's given himself up bone hand and foot, what will he say now, he'll never still claim to be Messiah will he, he'll never still claim to be the Son of God, it'll be suicide if he does, but the voice came back from the bound prisoner, I am, and somebody nudged Peter and Peter looked round, it was a girl, he says, you're one of them aren't you, look here he says, I'm not with him, if Christ had stood there with a sword drawn and legions of angels laying his enemies low and claiming to be Son of God, Peter would have been with him to the last drop of blood, willingly to give himself up to death and still claim to be God's Son, and he says Peter I'm not with that, I'm sorry, I'm not with that, I'm not with him, he never heard such a suicidal thing in all his life, and it was knowledge, common knowledge in Jerusalem, but when our Lord both claimed to be the Son of God and at the same time willingly gave himself to death, that his chief apostles washed his hands, I say again it's adamant nonsense to say that our Lord's claim to give himself to an atoning death as a sacrifice for sin originated with the church, adamant nonsense, this the central thing of Christianity, that one should come to our world claiming to be God's Son and human together, that he claimed to willingly give himself to death, this was a something that originated in the heart of God, was written in Old Testament scripture, was spoken to us first by the Lord, first by the Lord, confirmed unto us by them that heard him, so I come back to my main point, time and time again we gather to celebrate the Lord's supper, we stand so to speak on the bedrock of God's divine revelation to men, oh cling to it my young brother, be you only faithful to the Lord here, and come at his injunction constantly to remember him, and God will write it on your very heart, and you will come to such understanding of God's gospel, such an appreciation of God's divine revelation, that you shall be kept safe from that insidious attack of liberal theology, which is overthrowing the faith of so many. But someone will say, suppose only now that Christ did want to remind us of his death, because this is the central thing in Christianity, why please did he do it this way, to institute a ceremony with bread and wine, in which the congregation of the church takes part, receiving that bread and wine, surely the memory could have been perpetuated somehow else, someone could have got up and read a book that Christ himself wrote, he could have written surely, in which he explained the doctrine of the atonement in full, and we just listened, why did he make it something in which we not only listened, but the something in which we had personally to take part, eating the bread and drinking the wine, you say first of all because the thing graphically portrays his death, the body and the blood separate, so obviously. May I suggest another reason, because this Lord's Supper is not merely a record, but it is a symbol of a covenant, a symbol of a covenant, a covenant under which we are the beneficiaries, a covenant under which we receive all our spiritual blessing, and as we take the symbol, we reaffirm again and again, that we receive God's salvation on God's terms, you see this is the new covenant, the cup of the new covenant, new because it stands distinct from the old covenant, what was the old covenant, and the old covenant being the ten commandments was put inside the ark, which formed the throne of God, the old covenant expressed the principles upon which God proposed to govern that nation of Israel, and he offered them the covenant at the foot of Sinai and said, now these are my terms, if you and I are going to be in communion one with another, and in relation, and you shall be my people, and I shall be your God, and I shall be your King, and you will be my subjects, now here are the terms upon which I propose to rule you, are you prepared for the task? My sacrifice has obtained for us a great salvation, there are terms there too, as we take these symbols, we are saying, yes Lord, I receive you as Lord, and these your tasks, come let us consider the situations, Luke gives it, Luke points out that when our Lord arrived on his final visit to Jerusalem, he found the nation's heart barred against him, robbers in the temple, vineyard men, who had appropriated for their own pockets the vineyard and its produce, that belonged to God, even as the rightful heir came to the vineyard, they said this is the heir will kill him, and take the inheritance ourselves, Jerusalem city that should have been hid, occupied by the enemy, what did he do? He had come as Israel's king, riding upon an ass, hailed as the king that cometh in the name of the Lord, but the city was occupied by the enemy, and presently they were to cast him out, put him to a tree, must he go back to heaven defeated? I'll see now, whereas for many nights before Calvary, he had been going out of the city at night time, because it wasn't safe for him to stay in the city, during the day the multitude hung upon his lips, but at night he took the precaution of going outside the city, because the vineyard men were after him, came the last night, said he to his disciples, now go into the city, you shall see a man bearing a picture of water, a most unusual thing like an Irishman pushing a pram, you know, a man bearing a picture of water, follow him in, and find out who owns the house where he goes in, it won't be that man, it will be some other man who owns the house, and speak to him, why all this secrecy Lord, have you made arrangements? Yes I've made arrangements, on the quiet, because Jerusalem is a hostile city, they're after my blood, humanly speaking it's dangerous for me to be found there, but there's one man in Jerusalem, who's prepared to take the very best room in his house, and knowing that my enemies are after my blood, he's prepared to open his door and have me right in the very heart of enemy's territory, and there tonight I go, why all was dark around, in a city that was thirsting for his blood, he not only kept the Passover in that upper room, but he instituted his kingdom, kingdom, gave the terms of the covenant, in token gave his body and blood to seal the covenant, happy that man, who gave his lounge as a place where in enemy territory, Christ might establish his kingdom, honour, he formed the picture of every human heart that dares to receive Christ, for this world's night is not yet past, the day cometh, the night is indeed fast spent, but it's not yet past, and our Lord is still rejected, all those human hearts, that being in enemy territory, have opened the very best room and said Lord come in, and set up your kingdom here, ah those lovely little groups of Christians around the Roman world, when the Caesars raged, tried to block out the very name of Christ from the earth, all those lovely little homes, those barns, those secret meeting places, where a few Christians gathered, to take bread and take wine, what doing, pledging again that they were members of his kingdom, that in this little spot of earth, Christ reigned supreme, their Lord and God, they were his, I think you've not achieved the heart of God, and touched the heart of the ascended Christ, when in answer to his request, they last pledged their loyalty, that same heart looks down upon us now brethren, none the less touched, when in a hostile world you gather, and you break the bread, and drink the cup, affirming again, that here at least, Christ is king, and oh what a kingdom, what are the terms of his covenant, how much superior to that old first covenant, where the responsibility lay upon men, by the keeping of God's law, to earn salvation, oh what a different covenant this, where all we have to do is bankrupt sinners, to receive for nothing, salvation, that Christ has secured, and with it forgiveness, and with it the promise that God's Holy Spirit shall write his laws upon our hearts and minds, well our Holy Spirit also is witness to us, and he says I'll write them on their hearts and minds, and their sins and iniquities, I will remember no more forever, oh what a lovely covenant, we said yes to him when first we came in our bankruptcy, but do we not love to say it as often as we can possibly say it, and look up into his face, and take the cup, break it, and take the cup, and say Lord I affirm it, I take it, yes I do, and had I never done before, I should do it right now, and then they jangled, forgetful of the solemnity of the occasion, forgetful of the depth of the Lord's suffering, and he reproved them gently, saying brethren now, it's not the big man that's the boss, that the big one serves, and the one who serves is greater, oh what a lovely kingdom when the very king holds this viewpoint, he said you know, I'm among you is one that's further to me, now tell me said he, who in this world is counted the bigger, the man that serves at the table, or the people that sit at the table, well don't talk about that, it's the man that sits that's the big man isn't it, and the man that serves, well he's known as the small man, you go home tonight, you push a button by the fireplace in your lounge, and tell me the waiter comes, and says yes sir, oh wouldn't you feel important, my brother, suppose you could go home tonight, and press a button, and God's own son came, and said what would you like, I am among you said he, as one that serves, and you're the ones that sit at meat, oh how it tugs our hearts, and how can we have it otherwise, do we not sit at meat, great banquet of salvation, and watch him go and serve, ah the toil he had, to prepare the feast, we sit and eat, to there, again we take the bread, and take the cup, I'm worthy to sit and eat, but he insists on doing the serving, it's there that we begin to learn the ways of heaven, how can you do that my brother, and immediately turn around, and try to boss it over your fellow Christian, and says here yes sir, hi there gentlemen, now I had to borrow this room, I had to borrow it you know, it isn't mine this room, and you continued with me said all this long while, how grateful I am to you men, and we think on the quiet, well I haven't done very much, but oh how grateful Christ is, you've continued with me right to this very present time, it was genuinely a comfort to him was it not, because what would you think if when he said now, now, now my good brethren, you'll be here at Passover hour won't you, I'd like you to be here, to take this bread and wine, and Peter turned around and said oh sorry Lord but I can't come today, no I don't think it's important Lord, no I don't get much out of it Lord, oh I don't think even Peter though really knew how much Christ got out of it, you continued with me, oh how he buried it, I'll do better for you than this one day said he, one of these days it won't be any more borrowed up a room, I'll appoint you a kingdom, and you'll sit and eat and drink with me at my table, in my father's kingdom, this for now, you see he says I'm rejected, my good brethren he says you'll have to pay your own expenses in this world now for they cast me out, and I shall be reckoned with the outlaws, one of these days I shall give you a place at my table, in my father's kingdom, prophesying not only his death but his coming again, for at this supper are the fundamentals of our faith, his atoning death, his deity, his resurrection, his promise coming again, and in the meantime Peter he says you're running into some trouble presently, your face is going to be tested almost at breaking point but I pray for you Peter, and you who sit here today my disciple they're keeping this covenant supper, I pray for you so that on a certain day your face will not fail and you'll sit down with me in the courts of heaven, oh lovely kingdom and lovely king, I to sit with him be it only a borrowed room and only bread and only wine, lovely thing to sit with him, while he says look and as sure as you sit here today I shall see to it you'll sit with me at my father's table in his kingdom for I shall pray you there, I shall pray for you that your faith shall never fail. At that they went out, said here you'll have to pay your expenses and fight your own way he says because I am to be reckoned an outlaw and for this time you must be prepared to take your place with me and share my rejection, why have a supper constantly repeated in which we take part, but in this world that still rejects him we might as constantly reaffirm our loyalty to the lord, oh you say there's only a small thing and I want to get busy serving the lord, oh I say yes, here what I say now I'm no expert, but I'm told that when dutiful husbands go away on business say for six months they write once a month, I'm told that deluxe husbands you know the very super sort of husbands write once a week, I have occasionally come across extraordinary men who wrote every day, they may be angels I'd reckon, you say I shouldn't bother an old fellow writing home to your wife aren't you, aren't you doing the business for her, I mean get on with the business aren't you earning a new coat, well don't bother to write and tell her anything about that, just get on with the business, ah but love won't have it that way, affection won't have it that way, he could work for all six months but if he never wrote and it may be on his head that cold weather today and we had cabbage for dinner or whatever folks but you see is it not the gesture, you say but never mind old man even if you don't write you said I will once you don't have to keep on saying it, don't you have to keep on saying it, and the lord says yes I know your mind, I just like you to come please and reassign it to me, shall we say lord that I'm too busy getting on with your work shall we or shall we not see that the lord wants it and values it, else if he never requested don't we do it, if you walk round the walls of the city of Chester they will show you into a little museum of a place on the walls and inside there a table and on the table a board painted in dark browns and blues a smudge of meaningless colour it looks and then the keeper will come and bring a brightly polished tankard and set it down on the board and as he does so tell you to look in the side of the tankard and there reflected in the tankard are these colours, ah but now reflected in the curve of that tankard they are no longer a meaningless shamble of colours there grows a face and the face was the face of the exiled king, his loyal followers in a country that was against their king gathered to think about him and plot for him and as they drank their cup they put it on the board, the colours meant nothing to the world outside but to those who knew where to look they saw the very face of the king himself and the world thinks it's a cheap thing my brother they see nothing in that bread and wine but all can you not see as you take that cup and take that ordinary bread can you not on time see the very face of your absent king. Some understand this is all very good but this is somewhat remote isn't it, devotional maybe but ought we not to have something practical, practical indeed we ought to have something practical and a tremendously practical emphasis in our Christian life not good merely to dwell upon our blessings in Christ without seeing our responsibilities but should we wish to find a place where Christianity blossoms in all its practical implications he says there certainly should find no place better than the Lord Father for when it comes to the practical advancement of Christianity in my life the real strivings of God's Holy Spirit to make me into a holy man there is a place where God's Spirit has calculated to do it supremely above all and that is the Lord Father. So Paul writes to the Corinthian church now alas in a quagmire of misbehavior and calls their attention to the Lord's supper and says Brethren you must take this supper seriously you know the Lord instituted it on the night in which he was betrayed our ugly word that any could betray the Lord when we think of his lordship yes says Paul I want to talk to you about his lordship for I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you how that the Lord Jesus in the night when he was betrayed took bread and Brethren he says if you were to take that supper unworthily you would be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord for this is the Lord's supper we have not merely a savior but we have a divine Lord and he has put the seal of his lordship on the command that we break bread and drink wine in memory of him. That is all there is of this recording may the Lord bless you as you meditate and pray about it.
The Lords Supper
- Bio
- Summary
- Transcript
- Download

David Gooding (September 16, 1925 – August 30, 2019) was a British preacher, scholar, and author whose ministry focused on biblical exposition and teaching within evangelical circles, particularly among the Plymouth Brethren. Born in Ipswich, England, to a family of six children, he lost his mother at age nine and later cared for his aging father. He studied Classics at Trinity College, Cambridge, earning a B.A. in 1950 and an M.A. in 1954, followed by a Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge in 1955 with a dissertation on the Greek Deuteronomy. He served as a lecturer and reader in Classics at Queen’s University Belfast from 1959 to 1979, becoming Professor of Old Testament Greek in 1979 and Professor of Greek in 1983 until his retirement in 1986, when he was named Professor Emeritus. Elected to the Royal Irish Academy in 1977, he combined academic rigor with spiritual insight. Gooding’s preaching career spanned decades, marked by his international teaching ministry and lectures on the Bible’s relevance to philosophy and world religions. Active in a Gospel Assembly in Belfast, he preached widely, delivering sermons that explored both Old and New Testaments, such as his series on James at Risedale Gospel Hall in 1991. His expositions, including works like According to Luke (1987) and The Riches of Divine Wisdom (2013), translated into over 25 languages, emphasized Christ-centered interpretation and practical faith. Co-authoring with John Lennox, he influenced post-Soviet Christian literature in Russia and Ukraine. Unmarried, he died at age 93 in Belfast, leaving a legacy of scholarly yet accessible preaching preserved through Myrtlefield House and Gospel Folio Press.