- Home
- Speakers
- S. Lewis Johnson
- (Genesis) 13 The Reign Of The Grim Reaper And The Rapture Of Enoch
(Genesis) 13 - the Reign of the Grim Reaper and the Rapture of Enoch
S. Lewis Johnson

S. Lewis Johnson Jr. (1915–2004). Born on September 13, 1915, in Birmingham, Alabama, S. Lewis Johnson Jr. was a Presbyterian preacher, theologian, and Bible teacher known for his expository preaching. Raised in a Christian home, he earned a BA from the College of Charleston and worked in insurance before sensing a call to ministry. He graduated from Dallas Theological Seminary (ThM, 1946; ThD, 1949) and briefly studied at the University of Edinburgh. Ordained in the Presbyterian Church, he pastored churches in Mobile, Alabama, and Dallas, Texas, notably at Believers Chapel, where he served from 1959 to 1977. A professor at Dallas Theological Seminary and later Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, he emphasized dispensationalism and Reformed theology. Johnson recorded over 3,000 sermons, freely available online, covering books like Romans and Hebrews, and authored The Old Testament in the New. Married to Mary Scovel in 1940, he had two children and died on January 28, 2004, in Dallas. He said, “The Bible is God’s inspired Word, and its authority is final in all matters of faith and practice.”
Download
Topic
Sermon Summary
In this sermon, the speaker discusses the importance of living a life that is pleasing to God. He emphasizes the significance of knowing and following God's will, using examples from biblical figures such as Enoch and Peter. The speaker also highlights the value of individuals in human history, particularly those who have remained faithful to God. Additionally, the sermon touches on the concept of death and its presence in the book of Genesis.
Sermon Transcription
We are turning in our scripture reading to Genesis chapter 5, and I'm going to read through the fifth chapter for the scripture reading this morning. This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day when God created man, he made him in the likeness of God. He created them male and female, and he blessed them and named them man in the day when they were created. When Adam had lived 130 years, he became the father of a son in his own likeness, according to his image, and named him Seth. Then the days of Adam, after he became the father of Seth, were 800 years, and he had other sons and daughters. So all the days that Adam lived were 930 years, and he died. And Seth lived 105 years, and became the father of Enosh. Then Seth lived 807 years, after he became the father of Enosh, and he had other sons and daughters. So all the days of Seth were 912 years, and he died. And Enosh lived 90 years, and became the father of Kenan. Then Enosh lived 815 years, after he became the father of Kenan, and he had other sons and daughters. So all the days of Enosh were 905 years, and he died. And Kenan lived 70 years, and became the father of Mahalalo. Then Kenan lived 840 years, after he became the father of Mahalalo, and he had other sons and daughters. So all the days of Kenan were 910 years, and he died. And Mahalalo lived 65 years, and became the father of Jared. Then Mahalalo lived 830 years, after he became the father of Jared, and he had other sons and daughters. So all the days of Mahalalo were 895 years, and he died. And Jared lived 162 years, and became the father of Enoch. Then Jared lived 800 years, after he became the father of Enoch, and he had other sons and daughters. So all the days of Jared were 962 years, and he died. And Enoch lived 65 years, and became the father of Methuselah. Then Enoch walked with God 300 years, after he became the father of Methuselah, and he had other sons and daughters. So all the days of Enoch were 365 years, and Enoch walked with God, and he was not, for God took him. And Methuselah lived 187 years, and became the father of Lamech. Then Methuselah lived 782 years, after he became the father of Lamech, and he had other sons and daughters. So all the days of Methuselah were 969 years, and he died. And Lamech lived 182 years, and became the father of a son. Now he called his name Noah, saying, This one shall give us rest from our work, and from the toil of our hands during arising from the ground which the Lord had cursed. And I'd like for you to notice in the reading here that it is evident from this statement of Lamech, that he has been reflecting upon the promise of the seed, and also the judgment that God placed upon man as a result of his sin. You can see the language is very close to the language of chapter 3 verse 17, verse 30. Then Lamech lived 595 years, after he became the father of Noah, and he had other sons and daughters. So all the days of Lamech were 777 years, and he died. And Noah was 500 years old, and Noah became the father of Shem, Ham, and Japheth, and the important thing for you to notice here is the order of these sons is not the chronological order of their births. Now you learn this from other parts of the Bible, well other parts of Genesis for that matter. The oldest son was Japheth, the middle son was Shem, and the youngest son was Ham. But you can see the stress that is laid upon Shem here is due to the fact that it is Shem through whom the seed is to come. And so that is the important thing for the writer of this particular genealogy. The subject for this morning in the exposition of the book of Genesis is the reign of the grim reaper and the rapture of Enoch. There are a number of different ways to describe the contents of Genesis chapter 5. It concentrates on the history of Adam's other issue. We have just seen some concentration upon the issue of Adam through Cain, but here we have concentration upon the issue of Adam through Seth. It has been called the history of Adam, and it has been called by some the family of Seth. What Genesis chapter 5 seems to be is the history of Adam through Seth. It might be called biblical boot hill and Enoch's blast off, but that would be characteristic of the puffery of the 20th century to call it that. So we won't do that. Derek Kittner, who has written a very helpful little book on Genesis in the Tyndall series, has suggested that Genesis chapter 5 serves three purposes in the book of Genesis. In the first place, by mentioning all of the names of the genealogy, it accents the value of the individual. This is just an indication of the fact that the individuals of human history are known and are remembered by God, and particularly those that have stood in the line of the faithful. And second, Mr. Kittner has said it is valuable for us because it tells us how we come from Seth, whose name means appointed, to Noah the deliverer, giving us the chronological pathway from Seth down to Noah, of whom there shall be a great deal of information given. And then Mr. Kittner says third that it demonstrates the reign of death. We have this constant refrain that occurs eight times, and he died, and he died, and he died. And it tells us also of the possibility of the defeat of death in the experience of Enoch, because Enoch was not for God took him. Now we find both of these things illustrated through the Bible, this reign of death and the possibility of the defeat of death. The apostle Paul in the New Testament, leaning heavily on Genesis, says, for this cause, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin, so death passed upon all men, because all sinned, and he means sinned in Adam. And then at the conclusion of that same fifth chapter of the epistle to the Romans, he speaks about the possibility of the defeat of death through the Lord Jesus Christ. Beginning at the 20th verse of that chapter, he writes, and the law came in that the transgression might increase, but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more. That as sin reigned in death, even so grace might reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. When you read Genesis chapter 5, there are a couple of questions that constantly arise. In any Bible study, these will be asked sooner or later. Someone will say, knowing something about scientific information and data, will say, does not the chronology as presented in Genesis chapter 5 seem too brief to account for the scientific data that we have concerning the history of man? Can we really say that from Adam to Noah is only approximately 1650 years? Now it is possible to answer this in two ways. We can insist that this is what is called a tight genealogy, and I must admit that it is impossible to prove that that is wrong. It may well be that this is a tight genealogy with all the links in the chain being given by Moses. But on the other hand, it may not be a tight genealogy because we have biblical justification, biblical tradition, for that matter, for genealogies that are not tight. That is, genealogies in which not every link is given, but certain individuals passed over. We have one illustration of that in the first genealogy of the New Testament. Incidentally, if you are reading through the Bible according to our schedule, you have been reading the book of Genesis in the morning and the book of Matthew at night. And you read Matthew chapter 1, which has the genealogy of the Lord Jesus. And while I know if you are like I am, you did not bother to stop and read all that the Bible had to say about every one of those names, but you may have noticed in your reading, if you were very familiar with the Old Testament, that in verse 8 of Matthew chapter 1, three names in the genealogy of the Lord Jesus are skipped over and not mentioned. That is, they are dropped out. The links in the chain are all there in the sense that the genealogy is legal and proper, but not every person is given. Sometimes it's the grandson instead of the father, and so it skips from one man to his grandson. As a matter of fact, in that verse, to his great-grandson. So it is possible for genealogies to be accurate and in accordance with the culture of the times and not necessarily have every link. They are genealogies in which the individuals are highlighted. It's just as if I might say, and I could say this, I have a son. In my genealogy, he also has twin daughters. And you might give my genealogy by saying S. Lewis Johnson begat or begot S. Lewis Johnson, Jr., and he was the father of a son. But you might actually skip and say that S. Lewis Johnson or Lewis was the father of Colleen and Heather, skipping my son entirely. That would be proper, because I am, in that sense, their father in the genealogical line. Now that is what we may have in Genesis chapter 5. When I finished this morning, someone came to me and said, but does not Jude, a passage to which we'll refer later, when it says that Enoch was the seventh from Adam, and since he is the seventh here in this genealogy, does not that indicate that this is a tight genealogy? Well, it might, but it doesn't necessarily, because it might indicate simply that Jude speaks of Enoch's prophecy, and Enoch's prophecy is written in the light, and Jude speaks of Enoch in the light of this particular genealogy. He's the seventh from Adam in this particular genealogy. So we don't know whether this is a tight or a loose genealogy. We do know that so far as the scriptural record is concerned, there is no real problem, then, over the chronology, over the 1650 years. Now another problem that has caused some difficulty to readers of the Bible, at least they've pondered it, I have, I imagine most of you have, and that problem is the longevity of the patriarchs. We don't know anything about anybody living to be 100 or to be, living to be 969 years of age. We know about individuals who live to be 100 or 105 or even maybe 130. I read of a man not long ago who was 105 years old, and someone asked him what he thought about it. He said, well, if he had known he was going to live that long, he would have taken better care of himself. Well, that rather impressed itself upon me. He was an old man. And we do know of men living that old, but 900 and 965 and ages like that, perhaps the Bible doesn't intend itself to be taken literally. And some have suggested that maybe the years of the Bible are equivalent to our lunar months. And if you divide Methuselah's 965 years by 12, I didn't bother to do this, incidentally, but I think you'll come up with something around 85 to 90 years, and that would be a reasonable kind of age. But that wouldn't make such good sense on the other side, because Enoch, who lived to be 65, would have been approximately five and a half when he gave birth to Methuselah, which would also cause some problems for us. So I'm inclined to think that we have longevity in the patriarchs because of one or two things. The climate may have been more salubrious than our climate. It may be possible, as some have suggested, that there was a kind of canopy over the earth before the time of the Flood, and they lived in a hothouse atmosphere, not exposed to the things to which we are exposed. Or on the other hand, it may well have been that the ravages of sin had not yet come to their fruition in the effects that they have upon these bodies that we have now. After all, it was not so long before this that Adam, a man without sin, was created. And so when he sinned and fell and the sin principle began to work, it would take time for it to work itself out in the body to the extent it has today. It may just be that the ravages of sin were much weaker then than they are now. But I personally don't really have any great problem with these things. These are some of the things that we'll learn about when we get to heaven. I want to look now at the account and center attention on Enoch, but let me say a few words about the family of Seth from Adam to Enoch first. This is the book of the generations of Adam. Moses begins in the genealogy, and it reminds us immediately of the Gospel of Matthew. Because it begins, this is the book of the generation of Jesus, the Messiah. It's almost as if when we put these two chapters by the side of one another, that we have the history of two men given in the Bible. The history of Adam, the first, and the history of Adam, the last. And in fact, all history is subsumed under the history of these two men. Augustine said that many hundreds of years ago. He said, God deals with two men. He deals with Adam, the first, and he deals with Adam, the last. All men have sinned in Adam, the first, and are destined to die. Those who have believed in Adam, the last, experience the new birth, and live forever in him. So this book, this is the book of the generations of Adam, the first, and so it is the story of sinners. He begins the chapter with a kind of summary of the creation of Adam and Eve. In the days when God created man, he made him in the likeness of God. He created them male and female, and he blessed them and named them the Adamses. No, he didn't really name them that, did he? Actually, he named them man. Well, we should rewrite that. He named them person, not man. But you see, man here is used generically. It's a term that includes the male and the female. The male and the female are man. He named them man. I had a good Bible teacher, in fact, he led me to the Lord, who used to like to say that Eve's name was Adam before it was Eve. But that really is not what Moses intends by this, in my opinion. He merely means to say that God gave them the generic name of man, and it should be rendered man. He named them man in the day that they were created. So here we have the glorious original state of man, created by God, created male and female, blessed and named man when they were created. Incidentally, it says God named them, and we've been saying in our study of Genesis that the name indicates character. That was true in Semitic culture. And we also said that when Adam named the animals, it indicated that he had a magnificent intellect, given by God, of course. He was able to understand the animals and name them. He did not simply give them an identifying letter or two. But he named them in the sense that he understood them and their names matched their character and being. Now it says here that God named man in the day when they were created, suggestive to us of the fact that God names man because only he truly understands man. The only one who really understands man is God. That's also why psychology cannot be realistic or accurate unless it takes into account what we read in the scriptures about man. A psychology or a psychiatry that does not begin with what God reveals to us about man is bound to go astray. Now that which begins with the Bible and builds upon that foundation has possibilities of being a true biblical psychology. The account that follows is the account of the genealogy itself. Now I won't read through this again. I'm reminded of the old Scots minister who was reading from the opening chapter of the Gospel of Matthew and he started reading Abraham begat Isaac and Isaac begat Jacob and Jacob begat Judah and then looking on ahead at the mass of names that were coming up and wondering about how he would pronounce them. He said, and they kept on begetting one another all the way down this page and half the way down the next and went on from there. So I won't read again. I know you wondered how it was that I pronounced all of those names without any hesitation at all. It's of course because I know them so well. But I also learned this, that when you don't know them, act like you do. And the people in the audience being unsure of themselves will say he seems to know what he's talking about and we'll get by them. Now we have 1,500 years then of monotony in less than 1,500 words someone has said and he died and he died eight times over and that little phrase or clause is like the tolling of a bell. Someone has said like the solemn toll of a patriarchal funeral bell. We wander over biblical boot hill. Now notice that only the sons of Seth are named. The family of Cain also descended from Adam is an irrelevance so far as the purpose of the author in this chapter is concerned. Because what he is really interested in is not the other sons of Adam. He is interested in Seth and Seth's ancestry because it is from Adam through Cain that the seed of the woman is to come. And so that is the important thing for the author. And we noted that at the end of the chapter he displays that again by naming Shem first of the sons of Noah. So it is the line through Seth that is important. Incidentally the text says in verse 3 when Adam had lived 130 years he became the father of a son in his own likeness. According to his image. Now that means two things. That means of course that the image of God is still something that pertains to every one of us. We are in the image and likeness of God. But it is a marred image now. It is a corrupt image. The image remains. In the New Testament we are specifically told that in more than one place. Also here we are told that. But we should remember that while we are in the image of God it is a marred image. And when Seth is born in the image of Adam it means not simply in the image of God but in the image of Adam who is a fallen image of God. So the text here became the father of a son in his own likeness is not meant to exclude the fact that Seth is born a sinner. He is in the image of Adam in his image as well as in the marred image of God. Well now let's move down to verse 18 and following because here we have the story of Enoch. And we want to spend a little time on this account because it is emphasized in Genesis chapter 5. In verse 18 we read and Jared lived 162 years and became the father of Enoch. And verse 21 and Enoch lived 65 years and became the father of Methuselah. Then Enoch walked with God. It is almost as if you are looking at the TV screen as many of you no doubt will do this afternoon. And suddenly just preparatory to the commercial the projector stops and someone is caught in some act. It is as if the projector stops and suddenly when Enoch's name is mentioned we now are given special image, special information concerning this man who is the seventh from Adam. And further we learn concerning Enoch that he was not for God took him. For this one man the patriarchal funeral bell did not toll. Enoch did not die. Here is a man who planted his feet on high ground and walked with God into eternity and so far as we know he is still walking with God. The account which is said above he naming the man he lived after he begat so and so so many years. Instead of that in connection with Enoch we read he walked with God for 300 years. Of them it was said and he died. But of Enoch it is said he was not. It has been called the briefest biography in the Bible. Enoch walked with God. Well it is one of the briefest in the Bible. I love the one that is so briefly epitomizes the life of David given by the apostle Paul in the New Testament. He served the purpose of God in his own generation. Wouldn't it be wonderful if that could be said of us. He served the purpose of God in his own generation. Nothing particularly about great exploits. We don't have to have them to be great in the eyes of God. He served the purpose of God in his own generation. And then there is another one which is a rather solemn and terrifying one in one sense. It's the biography of Saul. He played the fool. He played the fool. Now we often I'm sure have thought of individuals that we have known whose life could be summarized and epitomized by that little statement. He played the fool. Enoch walked with God. But you know of all the biographies of scripture and of all of the brief ones there is none more eloquent than Enoch's. None more suggestive and very few are more complete. More complete? He walked with God? Yes, few are more complete. Because what does it tell us about Enoch? Well it tells us what he was as a father first of all. He walked with God. Oh for a father who walks with God someone might say. A father who walks with God. Consequently a child is brought up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. A father who walks with God. What could be greater than that? Instructed in the things of God. Someone concerned about the soul of his children. Someone anxious to see them brought to the knowledge of the Lord Jesus. What a magnificent father Enoch was. He walked with God. And it tells us something about Enoch as a husband too. He loved his wife as Christ loved the church. He cared for his wife. He ministered to her. He was her true spiritual head as he should be. He walked with God. You don't have to tell me what kind of man he was as a husband. I already know. He walked with God. He was exactly what the will of God sets forth for the husband. It tells us what he was as a neighbor too. He was a godly neighbor. And I understand exactly how his affairs with his neighbors were carried out. It tells us what he was as a citizen. It tells us what he was as a worker. It tells us what he was as a friend. He walked with God. We don't really need a biography of Enoch. We already know the great principles of the life of Enoch. He walked with God. Now there is an interesting thing about Enoch here I think. It says Enoch lived 65 years and became the father of Methuselah. And then he walked with God for 300 years. So he lived 65 years. He was the father of Methuselah and he walked with God for 300 years. Did his faith begin with the birth of his child? That's possible. That's very meaningful. This text does not really say that. But it's possible because who as a father holding his first child in his arms has not felt a sense of responsibility that he never felt until that time. Now I'll never forget the day when I was able to put my son in my arms. And I was the first incidentally. I had to teach my wife how to hold him. It was so long ago. It was in the days when we had practical nurses. She did not have an opportunity to hold a baby for a couple of weeks afterwards, really. So I had to instruct her how to hold a baby. But the sense of responsibility that comes when your own child is in your arms. It's possible that Enoch began to think about spiritual things. My responsibilities go beyond this life with this new life given to me. Some have said it's because Social Security came to him after all he was 65. And so he began to think about the future. No, that's not really true. There may be something else here. Because it's not certain that Enoch was converted when his child was born. Now we know that Enoch was a prophet in the New Testament. It states that he prophesied. We therefore know that he had, since he walked with God, intimate relationship with God. He named his child Methuselah. Methuselah is an interesting name. Some modern scholars think that it means man of a javelin. But there's no certainty about it even in modern scholarship. When I was just a new Bible student, someone put in my hand a book that had all the names of the Bible and the meaning of those names. It was not too scientific, but many of them were correct. I remember the name Methuselah and the definition that was given of that name. When he is dead, it shall come. Now the Hebrew word muth does have to do with death. But the Hebrew word shalach, which is apparently the latter part of Methuselah's name, means to send. And so it is more likely that his name means when he is dead, it shall be sent. Now if that is true, and since we know that when Methuselah died, the flood did come, it's just possible that he was told that he should name that child Methuselah because when he is dead, the catastrophe shall come. The flood. Well, don't you know what people think? We're thinking about the family of Enoch and Methuselah. When he is dead, it shall come. I imagine that when Enoch was not in sight, there were lots of people saying, where's Enoch? Where's Enoch? I mean, where's Methuselah? Where's Methuselah? Maybe they called him Meth. Where's Meth? When he is dead, it shall come. It just may be, you see, that Enoch was sobered by the fact of the flood and what it would bring and that caused him to rethink his life. And from that time on, he began to walk with the Lord. At any rate, it is true that he had an ordinary life for 65 years and then an extraordinary life for 300 years. In verse 22, it states, Enoch walked with God 300 years after he became the father of Methuselah and he had other sons and daughters. The simple exercise of faith filled the invisible with the one great loving face of God. Let me ask you to think for a moment about this word walked. Enoch walked with God. It does not say Enoch thought about God. I'm sure he did. It does not say that Enoch speculated about God. It does not say that Enoch constructed a systematic theology about God. It does not even say he read about God. No doubt, he did many of these things. It says, of course, that he walked with God. In other words, there was a beautiful combination of the theoretical with the practical. There was a beautiful combination of doctrine and practice. In fact, that's what Christian life is. It is the application of biblical doctrine. It's foolish for a person to think that he can please God if he does not know biblical doctrine. And on the other hand, it is foolish for a man who thinks that because he's gained some comprehension of biblical doctrine, that the comprehension itself, that alone is pleasing to God. There always must be the application of the biblical truth that we have. But all of our walking is to be in accordance with his word. That's why it's so important for us to know the Bible, to keep reading the Bible, to understand the word of God. We cannot possibly walk with God if we do not know Holy Scripture. We are fooling ourselves if we think we can walk with God and not be students of the word of God. We cannot do that. Others may think you are, but God knows the truth about you. Enoch walked with God because he knew God. He knew the truth about God and he was carrying out that truth. He walked with God. That involves agreement. Nobody can walk with anyone else if they are not agreed. Amos says, how can two walk together except they be agreed? Everyone knows that in business. You cannot do business if you are not in harmony with the organization that you are associated with. Walking involves keeping step. It means that when God took a step, Enoch had to take a step. And it meant when God did not take a step, Enoch was not to take a step. It's possible to fail to step when God steps and then it's possible to step when God does not intend for you to step. Peter illustrates that so beautifully. He steps when God did not step. When the soldiers came to take the Lord Jesus and Malchus was there, he pulled out his sword. Not being too handy with it, he attempted to split the helmet of the man right down the center at its weakest point and missed and caught the right ear of Malchus, the servant of the high priest. The Lord Jesus performed one of his miracles by putting the ear back on, but Peter had taken a step out of the will of God. And then later on when God would have him make a confession of his faith in fulfilling the prophecy that the Lord Jesus had given, denies the Lord Jesus before the cock crows three times. You see, it is possible to step in front of God, it is possible to lag behind, but Enoch walked with God. What a beautiful Christian life. My dear Christian friend, let me urge you to seek to walk with God. Not stepping before him, not lagging behind him, but following him as he is set forth in Holy Scripture. And of course it means happiness. The man who walks with God is the happy man. Think of walking with someone for 300 years. I don't know but just a few people that I would want to walk more than 50 years with. One of them I've almost walked 50 years with already. And I wouldn't mind walking 300 with her. But there are very few people that I would want to walk 300 years with. In fact there are some I wouldn't want to walk three days with. Speaking humanly, you understand? It would be a trial. But he walks with God for 300 years and he's just as happy at the end as he was at the beginning. Incidentally he was safe, for to walk with God means safety. He's under the shadow of the Almighty. Of course he's safe. And it is the place of honor. Them that honor me I will honor, God says. You young men who want to teach and preach the word of God, if you honor God and his word, God will honor you. There may be many who will seek to bring dishonor upon you, upset you, disturb you, deter you from the path of following God. But if you honor him, he will honor you. He will provide for you. He will also give you an audience to hear the things that he teaches you. It's the place of honor. But you know this is true of every individual Christian. This is true of the simplest Christian. The youngest Christian. The one who honors God, God will honor him. There is a beautiful little story of a little girl who was in Sunday school and was told the story of Enoch when she came home. Her mother asked what she had been taught. And she said, well we had this wonderful story today about a man named Enoch. He used to go for long walks with God. And one day they walked so far out from home that God said to him, Enoch, you're a long way from home. Just come on home with me. So that's what we read. Enoch walked with God and he was not far. God took him. Translated him, the writer of the epistle of the Hebrews says, by faith Enoch walked with God and he was not. God translated him. Enoch did not die. What a wonderful reticence by the way in the biblical description. Can you not imagine what TV propaganda would have made of this? We would have had days and days. We would be surfeited with all kinds of stories about the rapture of Enoch. But the Bible is so wonderfully reticent. An evidence of the truthfulness of its accounts incidentally. Now the chapter concludes with the family of Seth from Methuselah to Noah and we'll just say a word about it because our time is just about up. Methuselah was noted for two things. He was noted because he was the grandfather of Noah. He's also noted for the fact that he lived longer than any other man of whom we know. 969 years. Then Lamech. Lamech by the way is in the line of Adam through Seth. And there is a Lamech you'll remember, we studied him last week, who was in the line of Cain. What a difference between the two Lamechs. One is the man who is the author of the arrogant, boastful sword song in which he boasts that he will exercise vengeance on anyone who touches him. But here is a Lamech in the line of the line of faith who thinks about the promised seed. We read concerning this Lamech. He called the name of his son Noah. This one shall give us rest from our work and from the toil of our hands. He's thinking about the curse that has been placed upon them. The toil of our hands arising from the ground which the Lord has cursed. So he's a man who yearns for the coming of the seed of the woman. A man of faith. And finally Noah. In which the order of the sons is highlighted. Now you know people are inclined to read the book of Genesis after all it was many thousands of years ago wasn't it? And contend Enoch was able to walk with God because he didn't live in the 20th century. If he had lived in the 20th century he wouldn't have been able to walk with God in the way in which he is presented in the book of Genesis. In our day it's more difficult to walk with God. How foolish. Enoch did not live an easy life in an easy age. That wasn't the reason for his success. Listen to what Jude says in the New Testament. Thieves are grumblers finding fault following their own lusts. Jude continues. It is evident from this that Jude in his day understood that his age was an ungodly age. Four times he uses the adjective ungodly. He speaks about the ungodly deeds. He speaks about ungodly sinners. He talks about men who are ungodly. So Enoch incidentally he was the seventh from Adam and obviously a public figure. His name is highlighted in the genealogy. He comes from the promised land and he was a family man. He was no hermit. He did not go out and sit on a rock and meditate on spiritual things. He lived right in the midst of that ungodly society of his day. And it's described here as a degenerate society, a disintegrating society, a violent society with a rudimentary knowledge of God. But it's in that kind of society that Enoch walked with God. My dear Christian friend, do not think for one moment that it is not possible for you today to walk with God. In fact, it is your calling. And God would have you to walk with him today in the midst of this society in which we live. Of course, Enoch's life is an augury of the end of the reign of death. He was not, for God took him. By the way, that Hebrew word lachach is used twice in the Old Testament of the taking of individuals to the presence of the Lord. It's almost as if building upon the story of Enoch, the saint's future is referred to as God taking us from this life to glory. Because that is the hope of the Christian. He will take us to glory. And whether it is through death or through the rapture, it is a taking of God of his saints to glory. For that is ultimately what death is. Men have different ideas of death. Some people think of it as mysterious and inexplicable. Some that it is the one inevitable thing. Others that it is sheer extinction. Still others it is supreme terror. Some that it is release. Others that it is an adventure. But for Christians it is entrance into the presence of God. If you're here this morning and you are a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ, death is the means by which most of you shall enter into the presence of the Lord unless our Lord does not come. That's what death is. In the meantime, walking with God is the pastime and the calling of Christian believers. If you're here this morning and you have never believed in the Lord Jesus, you don't have this hope. It's not for you. You have no hope. As a matter of fact, you are without hope and without God in this world. You cannot walk with him. For the beginning of life must be the coming to the cross of the Lord Jesus where the blood was shed for sinners. Where there must be repentance for remission of sins. May God through the Holy Spirit speak to your heart if you're outside of Christ and may you through the Spirit come to understand your sin and guilt and condemnation and may you look off by the look of faith and see the Lord Jesus as the sacrifice for sin and may you flee, flee now to the cross of the Lord Jesus and receive as a gift eternal life. Then begins the walk with God. And for you who are believers, may God stir you to fulfill your calling to walk with him on into the presence of God. Enoch's experience is the experience God would have us all have. May God help us to fulfill our calling. Let's stand for the benediction. Father, we are so grateful to thee for these wonderful accounts from the inspired revelation. We know, Lord, they are given for a purpose to stir us. May the men of faith truly move us to a faith of a similar kind by the grace and power of our great God. We worship thee as believers in the Lord Jesus Christ and those who belong to the seed. And, O Father, we do pray for any in this audience who may not know the Lord Jesus Christ. O God, help them to see their lost condition, the danger and peril of a life outside of Christ. Bring them to know him, whom to know is life eternal. Save them. Deliver them. May grace, mercy, and peace go with us. For Jesus' sake, amen.
(Genesis) 13 - the Reign of the Grim Reaper and the Rapture of Enoch
- Bio
- Summary
- Transcript
- Download

S. Lewis Johnson Jr. (1915–2004). Born on September 13, 1915, in Birmingham, Alabama, S. Lewis Johnson Jr. was a Presbyterian preacher, theologian, and Bible teacher known for his expository preaching. Raised in a Christian home, he earned a BA from the College of Charleston and worked in insurance before sensing a call to ministry. He graduated from Dallas Theological Seminary (ThM, 1946; ThD, 1949) and briefly studied at the University of Edinburgh. Ordained in the Presbyterian Church, he pastored churches in Mobile, Alabama, and Dallas, Texas, notably at Believers Chapel, where he served from 1959 to 1977. A professor at Dallas Theological Seminary and later Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, he emphasized dispensationalism and Reformed theology. Johnson recorded over 3,000 sermons, freely available online, covering books like Romans and Hebrews, and authored The Old Testament in the New. Married to Mary Scovel in 1940, he had two children and died on January 28, 2004, in Dallas. He said, “The Bible is God’s inspired Word, and its authority is final in all matters of faith and practice.”