- Home
- Speakers
- Watchman Nee
- Cross Of Christ (Reading)
Cross of Christ (Reading)
Watchman Nee

Watchman Nee (1903 - 1972). Chinese evangelist, author, and church planter born Nee Shu-tsu in Fuzhou, Fujian, to Methodist parents. Converted at 17 in 1920 through Dora Yu’s preaching, he adopted the name Watchman, meaning “sound of a gong,” to reflect his call as a spiritual sentinel. Self-taught, he read over 3,000 books, including works by John Darby and Andrew Murray, and studied Scripture intensely, founding the Little Flock movement in 1922, which grew to 700 assemblies with 70,000 members by 1949. Nee authored over 60 books, including The Normal Christian Life (1957), emphasizing a crucified and resurrected life for believers. Married to Charity Chang in 1934, they had no children; she supported him through frequent illnesses. Despite no formal theological training, he trained thousands of Chinese workers, rejecting denominationalism for simple, Spirit-led churches. Arrested in 1952 under Communist rule, he spent 20 years in prison for his faith, enduring harsh conditions yet remaining steadfast. His writings, translated into 50 languages, shaped global evangelicalism, particularly in Asia and the West. Nee’s focus on spiritual depth over institutional religion continues to inspire millions. His words, “Good is not always God’s will, but God’s will is always good,” reflect his trust in divine purpose amid suffering.
Download
Topic
Sermon Summary
In this sermon, the preacher emphasizes the concept of substitution in the Christian life. He explains that there are two substitutions: one on the cross, where Jesus died in our place for our forgiveness, and one within us, where Christ lives His life in us for our victory. The preacher refers to the first eight chapters of the Epistle to the Romans as a practical and experimental guide to understanding the normal Christian life. He highlights the importance of recognizing that God's answer to every human need is His Son, Jesus Christ, and that Satan's accusations can be overcome by putting our faith in the precious blood of Jesus.
Scriptures
Sermon Transcription
What is the normal Christian life? We do well at the outset to ponder this question. The object of these studies is to show that it is something very different from the life of the average Christian. Indeed, a consideration of the written word of God, of the Sermon on the Mount for example, should lead us to ask whether such a life has ever in fact been lived upon the earth, save only by the Son of God himself. But in that last saving clause lies immediately the answer to our question. The Apostle Paul gives us his own definition of the Christian life in Galatians 2.20 It is no longer I, but Christ. Here he is not stating something special or peculiar, a high level of Christianity. He is, we believe, presenting God's normal for a Christian, which can be summarized in the words, I live no longer, but Christ lives his life in me. God makes it quite clear in his word that he has only one answer to every human need, his Son, Jesus Christ. In all his dealings with us, he works by taking us out of the way and substituting Christ in our place. The Son of God died instead of us for our forgiveness. He lives instead of us for our deliverance. So we can speak of two substitutions, a substitute on the cross who secures our forgiveness and a substitute within who secures our victory. It will help us greatly and save us from much confusion if we keep constantly before us this fact that God will answer all our questions in one way only, namely, by showing us more of his Son. We shall take now as a starting point for our study of the normal Christian life that great exposition of it which we find in the first eight chapters of the epistle to the Romans. We shall approach our subject from a practical and experimental point of view. It will be helpful first of all to point out a natural division of this section of Romans into two and to note certain striking differences in the subject matter of its two parts. A careful reading will show us that the subject matter of the two halves is not the same. For example, in the argument of the first section we find the plural word sins given prominence. In the second section, however, this is changed. For while the word sins hardly occurs once, the singular word sin is used again and again and is the subject mainly dealt with. Why is this? It is because in the first section it is a question of the sins I have committed before God which are many and can be enumerated whereas in the second it is a question of sin as a principle working in me. No matter how many sins I commit, it is always the one sin principle that leads to them. I need forgiveness for my sins, but I need also deliverance from the power of sin. The former touches my conscience, the latter my life. I may receive forgiveness for all my sins, but because of my sin I have, even then, no abiding peace of mind. When God's light first shines into my heart, my one cry is for forgiveness, for I realize I have committed sins before him. But when once I have received forgiveness of sins, I make a new discovery, namely the discovery of sin. And I realize not only that I have committed sins before God, but that there is something wrong within. I discover that I have the nature of a sinner. There is an inward inclination to sin, a power within that draws to sin. When that power breaks out, I commit sins. I may seek and receive forgiveness, for then I sin once more. So life goes on in a vicious circle of sinning and being forgiven, and then sinning again. I appreciate the blessed fact of God's forgiveness, but I want something more than that. I want deliverance. I need forgiveness for what I have done, but I need also deliverance from what I am. We begin then with the precious blood of the Lord Jesus Christ, and its value to us in dealing with our sins and justifying us in the sight of God. This is set forth for us in the following passages. All have sinned. God commended his own love toward us in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, being now justified by his blood, shall we be saved from the wrath of God through him. Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, God set forth to be a propitiation through faith by his blood to show his righteousness, because of the passing over of the sins done aforetime in the forbearance of God. For the showing, I say, of his righteousness at this present season, that he might himself be just and the justifier of him that hath faith in Jesus. The blood is for atonement and has to do first with our standing before God. We need forgiveness for the sins we have committed lest we come under judgment, and they are forgiven, not because God overlooks what we have done, but because he sees the blood. The blood is therefore not primarily for us, but for God. If I want to understand the value of the blood, I must accept God's valuation of it, and if I do not know something of the values set upon the blood by God, I shall never know what its value is for me. It is only as the estimate that God puts upon the blood of Christ is made known to me by his Holy Spirit, that I come into the good of it myself and find how precious indeed the blood is to me. But the first aspect of it is Godward. Throughout the Old and New Testaments, the word blood is used in connection with the idea of atonement, I think over a hundred times, and throughout it is something for God. In the Old Testament calendar, there is one day that has a great bearing on the matter of our sins, and that day is the Day of Atonement. Nothing explains this question of sins so clearly as the description of that day. In Leviticus 16, we find that on the Day of Atonement, the blood was taken from the sin offering and brought into the Most Holy Place, and there sprinkled before the Lord seven times. We must be very clear about this. On that day, the sin offering was offered publicly in the court of the tabernacle. Everything was there in full view and could be seen by all. But the Lord commanded that no man should enter the tabernacle itself except the high priest. It was he alone who took the blood and going into the Most Holy Place, sprinkled it there to make atonement before the Lord. Why? Because the high priest was a type of the Lord Jesus in his redemptive work, and so, in figure, he was the one who did the work. None but he could even draw near to enter in. Moreover, connected with his going in, there was but one act, namely, the presenting of the blood to God as something he had accepted, something in which he could find satisfaction. It was a transaction between the high priest and God in the sanctuary, away from the eyes of the men who were to benefit by it. The Lord required that. The blood is therefore in the first place for him. Earlier, even than this, there is described in Exodus 12, verse 13, the shedding of the blood of the Passover lamb in Egypt for Israel's redemption. This is again, I think, one of the best types in the Old Testament of our redemption. The blood was put on the lintel and on the doorposts, whereas the meat, the flesh of the lamb, was eaten inside the house. And God said, when I see the blood, I will pass over you. Here we have another illustration of the fact that the blood was not meant to be presented to man, but to God. For the blood was put on the lintel and on the doorposts, where those feasting inside the house would not see it. It is God's holiness, God's righteousness, which demands that a sinless life should be given for man. There is life in the blood, and that blood has to be poured out for me, for my sins. God is the one who requires it to be so. God is the one who demands that the blood be presented in order to satisfy his own righteousness. And it is he who says, when I see the blood, I will pass over you. The blood of Christ wholly satisfies God. Now the whole trouble with us is that we are trying to sense it. We are trying to feel its value and to estimate subjectively what the blood is for us. We cannot do it. It does not work that way. The blood is first for God to see. We then have to accept God's valuation of it. In doing so, we shall find our valuation. If instead we try to come to a valuation by way of our feelings, we get nothing. We remain in darkness. No, it is a matter of faith in God's word. We have to believe that the blood is precious to God because he says it is so. If God can accept the blood as a payment for our sins and as the price of our redemption, then we can rest assured that the debt has been paid. If God is satisfied with the blood, then the blood must be acceptable. Our valuation of it is only according to his valuation, neither more nor less. It cannot of course be more, but it must not be less. Let us remember that he is holy and he is righteous and that a holy and righteous God has the right to say that the blood is acceptable in his eyes and has fully satisfied him. The blood has satisfied God. It must satisfy us also. It has therefore a second value, that is manward in the cleansing of our conscience. When we come to the epistle to the Hebrews, we find that the blood does this. We are to have hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience. This is most important. Look carefully at what it says. The writer does not tell us that the blood of the Lord Jesus cleanses our hearts and then stop there in his statement. We are wrong to connect the heart with the blood in quite that way. It may show a misunderstanding of the sphere in which the blood operates to pray, Lord cleanse my heart from sin by thy blood. The heart, God says, is desperately sick. And he must do something more fundamental than cleanse it. He must give us a new one. We do not wash in iron clothing that we are going to throw away. As we shall shortly see, the flesh is too bad to be cleansed. It must be crucified. The work of God within us must be something wholly new. A new heart also will I give you. And a new spirit will I put within you. No, I do not find it stated that the blood cleanses our hearts. Its work is not subjective in that way, but wholly objective before God. True, the cleansing work of the blood is seen here in Hebrews 10 to have reference to the heart. But it is in relation to the conscience. Having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience. What then is the meaning of this? It means that there was something intervening between myself and God. As a result of which I have an evil conscience whenever I sought to approach Him. It was constantly reminding me of the barrier that stood between myself and Him. But now, through the operation of the precious blood, something new has been effected before God which has removed that barrier and God has made that known to me in His word. When that has been believed in and accepted, my conscience is at once cleared and my sense of guilt removed. And I have no more an evil conscience toward God. Every one of us knows what a precious thing it is to have a conscience void of offense in our dealings with God. A heart of faith and a conscience clear of any and every accusation are both equally essential to us since they are interdependent. As soon as we find our conscience is uneasy, our faith leaks away and immediately we find we cannot face God. In order therefore to keep going on with God, we must know the up-to-date value of the blood. God keeps short accounts and we are made nigh by the blood every day, every hour and every minute. It never loses its efficacy as our ground of access if we will but lay hold upon it. When we enter the most holy place, on what ground dare we enter but by the blood? But I want to ask myself, am I really seeking the way into the presence of God by the blood or by something else? What do I mean when I say by the blood? I mean simply that I recognize my sins, that I confess that I have need of cleansing and of atonement, that I come to God on the basis of the finished work of the Lord Jesus. I approach God through His merit alone and never on the basis of my attainment, never for example on the ground that I have been extra kind or patient today or that I have done something for the Lord this morning. I have to come by way of the blood every time. A clear conscience is never based upon our attainment. It can only be based on the work of the Lord Jesus in the shedding of His blood. What after all is your basis of approach to God? Do you come to Him on the uncertain ground of your feeling? The feeling that you may have achieved something for God today? Or is your approach based on something far more secure? Namely the fact that the blood has been shed and that God looks on that blood and is satisfied. As with many other stages of our Christian experience this matter of access to God has two phases an initial and a progressive one. The former is presented to us in Ephesians 2 and the latter in Hebrews 10. Initially our standing with God was secured by the blood for we are made nigh in the blood of Christ. But thereafter our ground of continual access is still by the blood. The apostle exhorts us having therefore boldness to enter into the holy place by the blood of Jesus, let us draw near. To begin with I was made nigh by the blood. And to continue in that new relationship I come through the blood every time. It is not that I was saved on one basis and that I now maintain my fellowship on another. You say that is very simple. It's the ABC of the gospel. Yes, but the trouble with many of us is that we have moved away from the ABC. We have thought we have progressed and so could dispense with it. But we can never do so. No. My initial approach to God is by the blood. And every time I come before him it is the same. Right to the end it will always and only be on the ground of the blood. We may be weak but looking at our weakness will never make us strong. No trying to feel bad and doing penance will help us to be even a little holier. There is no help there. So let us be bold in our approach because of the blood. Lord, I do not know fully what the value of the blood is. But I know that the blood has satisfied thee. So the blood is enough for me. And it is my only plea. I see now that whether I have really progressed, whether I have really attained to something or not is not the point. Whenever I come before thee, it is always on the ground of the precious blood. Then our conscience is really clear before God. No conscience from the blood. It is the blood that gives us boldness. No more conscience of sins. These are tremendous words of Hebrew 10 verse 2. We are cleansed from every sin. We truly echo the words of Paul. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not reckon sin. In view of what we have said we can now turn to face the enemy. For there is a further aspect of the blood which is Satan-ward. Satan's most strategic activity in this day is as the accuser of the brethren. And it is as this that our Lord confronts him with his special ministry as highly priest through his own blood. How then does the blood operate against Satan? It does so by putting God on the side of man against him. The fall brought something into man which gave Satan a footing within him with the result that God was compelled to withdraw himself. Man is now outside the garden, beyond reach of the glory of God because he is inwardly estranged from God. Because of what man has done there is something in him which until it is removed renders God morally unable to defend him. But the blood removes that barrier and restores man to God and God to man. Man is in favour now and because God is on his side he can face Satan without fear. You remember that verse in John's first epistle and this is the translation of it I like best. The blood of Jesus his son cleanses us from every sin. It is not exactly all sin in the general sense but every sin every item. What does it mean? Oh it is a marvellous thing. God is the light and as we work in the light with him everything is exposed and open to that light so that the blood is able to cleanse from every sin. What a cleansing! It is not that I have not a profound knowledge of myself nor that God has not a perfect knowledge of me. It is not that I try to hide something nor that God tries to overlook something. No! It is that he is in the light and I too am in the light. And that there the precious blood cleanses me from every sin. The blood is enough for that. Since God seeing all our sins in the light can forgive them on the basis of the blood, what ground of accusation has Satan? Satan may accuse us before him, but if God is for us, who is against us? God points him to the blood of his dear son. It is the sufficient answer against which Satan has no appeal. Who shall lay anything to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifies. Who is he that shall condemn? It is Christ Jesus that died, yea, but rather that was raised from the dead. Who is it at the right hand of God? Who also maketh intercession for us? So here again, our need is to recognize the absolute sufficiency of the precious blood. Christ having come a high priest through his own blood entered him once for all into the holy place having obtained eternal redemption. He was redeemer once. He has been high priest and advocate for nearly two thousand years. He stands there in the presence of God and he is the propitiation for our sins. Note the words of Hebrew 9 verse 14 How much more shall the blood of Christ they underline the sufficiency of his ministry it is enough for God. What then of our attitude to Satan? The reason why we so readily accept his accusations is that we are still hoping to have some righteousness of our own. The ground of our expectation is wrong. Satan has succeeded in making us look in the wrong direction. Thereby he wins his point rendering us ineffective. But if we have learned to put no confidence in the flesh we shall not wonder if we sin for the very nature of the flesh is to sin. Do you understand what I mean? It is because we have not come to appreciate our true nature and to see how helpless we are that we still have some expectation in ourselves with the result that when Satan comes along and accuses us we go down under it. God is well able to deal with our sins but he cannot deal with a man under accusation because such a man is not trusting in the blood. The blood speaks in his favor but he is listening instead to Satan. Christ is our advocate but we the accused side with the accuser. We have not recognized that we are unworthy of anything but death. But as we shall shortly see we are only fit to be crucified anyway. We have not recognized that it is God alone that can answer the accuser and within the precious blood he has already done so. Our salvation lies in looking away to the Lord Jesus and in seeing that the blood of the Lamb has met the whole situation created by that is the sure foundation on which we stand. Never should we try to answer Satan with our good conduct but always with the blood. Yes we are sinful but praise God the blood cleanses us from every sin. God looks upon the blood whereby his son has met the charge and Satan has no more ground of attack. Our faith in the precious blood and our refusal to be moved from that position can alone silence his charges and put him to flight. And so it will be right on to the end. Oh what an emancipation it would be if we saw more of the value in God's eyes of the precious blood of his dear son.
Cross of Christ (Reading)
- Bio
- Summary
- Transcript
- Download

Watchman Nee (1903 - 1972). Chinese evangelist, author, and church planter born Nee Shu-tsu in Fuzhou, Fujian, to Methodist parents. Converted at 17 in 1920 through Dora Yu’s preaching, he adopted the name Watchman, meaning “sound of a gong,” to reflect his call as a spiritual sentinel. Self-taught, he read over 3,000 books, including works by John Darby and Andrew Murray, and studied Scripture intensely, founding the Little Flock movement in 1922, which grew to 700 assemblies with 70,000 members by 1949. Nee authored over 60 books, including The Normal Christian Life (1957), emphasizing a crucified and resurrected life for believers. Married to Charity Chang in 1934, they had no children; she supported him through frequent illnesses. Despite no formal theological training, he trained thousands of Chinese workers, rejecting denominationalism for simple, Spirit-led churches. Arrested in 1952 under Communist rule, he spent 20 years in prison for his faith, enduring harsh conditions yet remaining steadfast. His writings, translated into 50 languages, shaped global evangelicalism, particularly in Asia and the West. Nee’s focus on spiritual depth over institutional religion continues to inspire millions. His words, “Good is not always God’s will, but God’s will is always good,” reflect his trust in divine purpose amid suffering.