Just an observation,It seems you may be holding the purity of your doctrine as the standard over and against all others. Wouldn't this fall into the same category you are seeking to condemn? I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with you, as I still fail to see the point you're driving at here.
No doctrine here. I asked a plain question that is right to the point. You can answer to agree or disagree.
_________________Jade
So you hold the position of having no doctrine at all, and if so, is that the purity of doctrine (that to is a doctrine) to which you are holding others accountable? Either way, what your saying is condemning yourself along with the people you condemn. "For with what judgment you judge..." Paul was very adamant that his doctrine was correct against all others, he said it outright many times. Is Paul to be condemned? I'm just seeking for at least some level of consistency, otherwise I don't see a way to even enter into a discussion about your initial accusation.
I repeat what I said:No doctrine here. I asked a plain question that is right to the point. You can answer to agree or disagree.I am not interested in a non-discussion that evades what I clearly said and says nothing in reply but goes round the bush.Please do not try to intimidate me.I will not discuss this any further with you.
You said, "I will not discuss this any further with you"That seems to be the way most of your discussions with everyone end, and they always seem awfully hostile. Is everything ok (that isn't a facetious question, I'm genuinely inquiring) ?
