SermonIndex Audio Sermons
SermonIndex - Promoting Revival to this Generation
Give To SermonIndex
Discussion Forum : Articles and Sermons : mans free will

Print Thread (PDF)

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 )
PosterThread
Koheleth
Member



Joined: 2005/11/10
Posts: 530
NC

 Re:

This is an earlier post that I am responding to later. Sorry if this is confusing.

Quote:

theopenlife wrote:

For almost six months I have avoided these discussions on SI, but it is truly a great sorrow on my soul to see such worldly wisdom being spouted forth to the shame of Christ's redemption. I have written the following with grief and love, and no striving spirit, for the hope that Christ might be glorified. Please receive it as such.



I wish your grief and love would have prevented you from saying that those who disagree with you are "spouting forth [worldly wisdom] to the shame of Christ's redemption."

Quote:

theopenlife wrote:

May I ask in all seriousness, does God have a free will? To what extent? Is God free to lie? Could He sin if He wanted to?

"But He will never want to!" you exclaim.

And why not? How are you so certain that God will never choose to deceive, lust, or in any other way to sin?

You know that God will never choose to sin because you have an almost innate understanding that all choices of the will flow out from the nature of a being. God's choices reflect His nature, and His nature is holy.



This is a very incomplete argument. How do you know that God's own moral limits are due to his nature and not his omnipotence? Or similarly his foreknowledge? Or another factor?

I will skip the next many paragraphs because they build on this premise of "nature", which has not yet been established.

Quote:

theopenlife wrote:

Paul adds elsewhere, "The god of this world (the devil) has [b]blinded the minds of the unbelievers[/b], to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ who is the image of God." [2 Cor 4:4]

This is precisely why unregenerate men must first be given "new hearts."



That position does not make sense. Why would the devil have to blind the eyes of those who cannot see and are incapable of seeing?

Quote:

theopenlife wrote:

"A [b]new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you[/b]: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an [b]heart of flesh[/b]. And I will put my Spirit within you, and [b]cause you to walk in my statutes[/b], and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them." [Ezekiel 36:26-27] Note that until God gives a new heart, the person has a stony, rebelious one. While he is yet a dead cold stone, God makes him a new living creation and places an obedient spirit within him. God does not need to make man will anything - He needs only to change man's nature, and the will of the man begins to act according to the new system of judgement.



Do you know to whom this Scripture was spoken?

Quote:

theopenlife wrote:

Note, it is salvation itself which is the gift, not merely the "offer" of salvation. It is being re-created which Paul is rejoicing in, and not the opportunity of re-creating ourselves through human volition.



Just because we do not follow Calvin does not mean that you should imply there is any general teaching of salvation or regeneration by human volition. God does all of the saving and sanctifying. We just disagree on why and how he does it. But he does it.

Quote:

theopenlife wrote:

Again, it is not enough for bad trees to will to produce good fruit; they must become entirely different "good trees." [Matt 7] "Bad trees [b]cannot[/b] bear good fruit." Is there any better fruit than faith in Christ. Every man is naturally a bad tree, and cannot please God.



Seems like a tough position for a Calvinist to take! So Christians are good trees? Why do Calvinists, at least the ones I have met, say that a believer is going to sin and have sin in his or her life until the day they die? Don't they have a new nature according to your teaching? Or has God's regenerating work failed? If they are good trees now, they should only produce good fruit. There must be no fruit like what comes from bad trees. Is Calvinism able to explain this point?

Quote:

theopenlife wrote:

In the beginning God made man upright, capable either of obeying the Lord or choosing to sin. God covenanted with Adam in the garden, promising him life if he would obey the commands of God, and eternal death if he would not. The Lord was free to make this arrangement, even as He made similar arrangements with the angels.



Calvinism teaches that the fall of man was ordained from the foundation of the world, before Adam was created. So Adam did not have this free choice that you state.

You say "God covenanted with Adam". Where does it say this?

Can you show where God made similar arrangements with the angels. I hate to call out minor points, but am not sure why you are saying all of these things. It sounds like more of the theological system. Does it have much to do with Scripture?

 2009/8/19 23:51Profile









 Re:

tjservant i would like to say that your statement was a wonderful statement and the best i have heard. Thank you for posting that. I am not taking away from what anyone said but that was beautiful.

 2009/8/21 0:15









 Re:

When God spoke to Cain, after the fall of Adam, he certainly spoke to him as if he had a free will:

“And the Lord said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen? If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him” (Gen. 4:6-7)

Cain murdered his brother. It wasn't Satan who made him do it. It wasn't his nature that made him do it. It was his father Adam who made him do it. And it certainly wasn't God who made him do it. It was Cain's own fault because it was Cain's own free choice.

 2009/8/21 2:03
theopenlife
Member



Joined: 2007/1/30
Posts: 926


 Re:

Koheleth, we seem to be talking past one another at this point. I would rather us not appear to strive in this setting. I have said what I originally intended to say and will refrain from going on (as we could both carry this for ten more pages). If you or anyone would like to continue this in PMs, that might be more appropriate. Thank you.

 2009/8/21 2:08Profile





All sermons are offered freely and all contents of the site
where applicable is committed to the public domain for the
free spread of the gospel.