i'm not implying anything. i just found this and here it is... although they make it pretty clear.
there is a place where i put ***text*** that is MY words, not quotes from the excerpt.
origional FULL article found here;
[u]U.N. 'Climate Change' Plan Would Likely Shift Trillions to Form New World Economy[/u]
--Friday, March 27, 2009
--By George Russell
Print A United Nations document on "climate change" that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge [b]reordering[/b] ([/i]***may mean that it is just shifting finaces, might disprove a "single currency," but IF they are talking about a "new world economy" this could be preliminary steps to be taken for it to be just on the near horizon.***[i]) [b]of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer[/b], millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes all under the supervision of the world body.
Those and other results are blandly discussed in a discretely worded United Nations "information note" on potential consequences of the measures that industrialized countries will likely have to take to implement the Copenhagen Accord, the successor to the Kyoto Treaty, after it is negotiated and signed by December 2009. The Obama administration has said it supports the treaty process if, in the words of a U.S. State Department spokesman, it can come up with an "effective framework" for dealing with global warming.
The 16-page note, obtained by FOX News, will be distributed to participants at a mammoth negotiating session that starts on March 29 in Bonn, Germany, the first of three sessions intended to hammer out the actual commitments involved in the new deal.
In the stultifying language that is normal for important U.N. conclaves, the negotiators are known as the "Ad Hoc Working Group On Further Commitments For Annex I Parties Under the Kyoto Protocol." Yet the consequences of their negotiations, if enacted, would be nothing short of world-changing.
[b]Getting that deal done has become the United Nations' highest priority,[/b] and the Bonn meeting is seen as a critical step along the path to what the U.N. calls an "ambitious and effective international response to climate change," which is intended to culminate at the later gathering in Copenhagen[/i]
EDIT: made it look better and less confusing