SermonIndex Audio Sermons
SermonIndex - Promoting Revival to this Generation
Give To SermonIndex
Discussion Forum : General Topics : The bibilical basis, please, for....

Print Thread (PDF)

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 Next Page )
PosterThread
jordanamo
Member



Joined: 2006/11/23
Posts: 397


 Re:

Quote:
When you come, bring the cloak that I left with Carpus at Troas, also the books, and above all the parchments. 2 Tim. 4:13



Haha. Fascinating. But was it the OT? I'd suppose so! What other books would Paul be reading? Clark says, "and the books; that were in it, or were there, besides the Hebrew Pentateuch: the apostle was a great reader of books, of various sorts, both Gentile and Jewish, as appears by his citations out of the Heathen poets, and his acquaintance with Jewish records, Act_17:28. And though he was now grown old, and near his exit, yet was mindful and careful of his books, and desirous of having them to read; and herein set an example to Timothy and others, and enforced the exhortation he gave him."

Jordan

 2007/3/12 21:50Profile
rookie
Member



Joined: 2003/6/3
Posts: 4821
Savannah TN

 Re:

Anything other than the Scriptures are not perfect. They are written by men who only know Christ dimly. There will come a time when we will see Christ perfectly.

Therefore the most perfect way is to read only the Scriptures...read them 50 times. Listen to the thoughts that come to your mind. Search the Scriptures and find the treasure.

2Ti 3:16 All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

Pro 2:1 ¶ My son, if thou wilt receive my words, and hide my commandments with thee;
2 So that thou incline thine ear unto wisdom, [and] apply thine heart to understanding;
3 Yea, if thou criest after knowledge, [and] liftest up thy voice for understanding;
4 If thou seekest her as silver, and searchest for her as [for] hid treasures;
5 Then shalt thou understand the fear of the LORD, and find the knowledge of God.
6 For the LORD giveth wisdom: out of his mouth [cometh] knowledge and understanding.
7 He layeth up sound wisdom for the righteous: [he is] a buckler to them that walk uprightly.
8 He keepeth the paths of judgment, and preserveth the way of his saints.
9 Then shalt thou understand righteousness, and judgment, and equity; [yea], every good path.
10 When wisdom entereth into thine heart, and knowledge is pleasant unto thy soul;
11 Discretion shall preserve thee, understanding shall keep thee:
12 To deliver thee from the way of the evil [man], from the man that speaketh froward things;


The more you taste the sweetness of the Scriptures, the less dependent you are on other men. That is why the pharisees hated Jesus.

God Bless
In Christ
Jeff


_________________
Jeff Marshalek

 2007/3/12 23:15Profile
divdasunder
Member



Joined: 2006/12/10
Posts: 76
Ohio

 Re:

Just out of curiosity, does your friend go to church and listen to sermons downloads? What is the difference if I listen to a preacher, or I open up his book and read the things he wants to expound on? This question was brought up to me recently.
I know that nothing but God and his Word is not perfect, but there is wisdom in the multitude of counselors. Back in Timothy and Pauls day, Pauls letters were not considered scripture, but Timothy and all the churches still read them.
Riding for the King,
Adam


_________________
Adam Moore

 2007/3/13 6:03Profile
death2self
Member



Joined: 2006/9/28
Posts: 192
Washington DC area

 Re:

Jordan,

I don't doubt what the Lord spoke to your friend but the word was for Him. I'm prayerful that I will someday will be in that same place solely by the grace of God but am not yet there.

Here's what John Wesley said about this "In 1727 I read Mr. Law's Christian Perfection and Serious Call, and more explicitly resolved to be all devoted to God, in body, soul, and spirit. In 1730 I began to be homo unius libri, to study (comparatively) no book but the Bible."

Reading outside books and listening to sermons is not a substitute for reading the scriptures for ourselves but am quite certain you know that already.


_________________
Ed Pugh

 2007/3/13 7:35Profile
John173
Member



Joined: 2007/1/30
Posts: 289
Omaha

 Re:

I posted a link to this article but it seems to have been ignored (?). It directly addresses this question and contains some sage considerations. Enjoy.


Advice On Reading
by Richard Baxter (1615-1691)


"Make careful choice of the books which you read: let the holy scriptures ever have the pre-eminence, and, next to them, those solid, lively, heavenly treatises which best expound and apply the scriptures, and next, credible histories, especially of the Church . . . but take heed of false teachers who would corrupt your understandings."

1. As there is a more excellent appearance of the Spirit of God in the holy scripture, than in any other book whatever, so it has more power and fitness to convey the Spirit, and make us spiritual, by imprinting itself upon our hearts. As there is more of God in it, so it will acquaint us more with God, and bring us nearer Him, and make the reader more reverent, serious and divine. Let scripture be first and most in your hearts and hands and other books be used as subservient to it. The endeavours of the devil and papists to keep it from you, doth shew that it is most necessary and desirable to you.

2. The writings of divines are nothing else but a preaching of the gospel to the eye, as the voice preaches it to the ear. Vocal preaching has the pre-eminence in moving the affections, and being diversified according to the state of the congregation which attend it: this way the milk comes warmest from the breast. But books have the advantage in many other respects: you may read an able preacher when you have but a average one to hear. Every congregation cannot hear the most judicious or powerful preachers: but every single person may read the books of the most powerful and judicious; preachers may be silenced or banished, when books may be at hand: books may be kept at a smaller charge than preachers: we may choose books which treat of that, very subject which we desire to hear of; but we cannot choose what subject the preacher shall treat of. Books we may have at hand every day. and hour; when we can have sermons but seldom, and at set times. If sermons be forgotten, they are gone; but a book we may read over and over, till we remember it: and if we forget it, may again peruse it at our pleasure, or at our leisure. So that good books are a very great mercy to the world: the Holy Ghost chose the way of writing, to preserve His doctrine and laws to the 'Church, as knowing how easy and sure a way it is of keeping it safe to all generations, in comparison of mere verbal traditions.

3. You have need of a judicious teacher at hand, to direct you what books to use or to refuse: for among good books there are some very good that are sound and lively; and some good, but mediocre, and weak and somewhat dull; and some are very good in part, but have mixtures of error, or else of incautious, injudicious expressions, fitter to puzzle than edify the weak.



Baxter's Guide To The Value Of A Book



While reading ask oneself:

1. Could I spend this time no better?

2. Are there better books that would edify me more?

3. Are the lovers of such a book as this the greatest lovers of the Book of God and of a holy life?

4. Does this book increase my love to the Word of God, kill my sin, and prepare me for the life to come?




_________________



_________________
Doug Fussell

 2007/3/13 8:11Profile









 Re: The bibilical basis, please, for....

jordanamo wrote

Quote:
I like reading Art Katz, Watchman Nee, Oswald Chambers, et cetera, but is that wrong, since it's "extrabiblical" in some sense? I find them hugely inspiration, but am I replacing the Word with them?

Often, the answers are in our own questions, which reveal how we have been taught to think, or, asked to start thinking by someone else presenting their own point of view, as you have been in this situation.

Regarding your friend only reading the word of God, that is slightly similar to my having decided many years ago, only to sing for God. (No pop music for 'fun', or taking up my brainspace with secular words.) If God said that to your friend, which I can believe He did, then your friend has no choice any more.

But, if God has NOT told you only to read the word, then you do have a choice, still. Why? Because God wants you to learn to walk in newness of life, making your choices through the Spirit's leading.

Romans 8 TNT
For they that are carnal, are canally minded. But they that are spiritual, are ghostly minded. To be carnally minded, is death. But to be spiritually minded is life and peace. Because that the fleshly mind is enmity against God: for it is not obedient to the law of God, neither can be. So then they that are given to the flesh, cannot please God.

But ye are not given to the flesh, but to the spirit: if so be that the spirit of God dwell in you. If there be any man that hath not the spirit of Christ, the same is none of his. If Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin: but the spirit is life for righteousness' sake. Wherefore if the spirit of him that raised up Jesus from death, dwell in you: even he that raised up Christ from death, shall quicken your mortal bodies, because that this spirit dwelleth in you.

Therfore brethren we are now debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh. For if ye live after the flesh, ye must die. But if ye mortify the deeds of the body, by the help of the spirit, ye shall live. For as many as are led by the spirit of God: they are the sons of God. For ye have not receivd the spirit of bondage to fear any more, but ye have received the the spirit of adoption whereby we cry Abba father.


So, in pitting people like Katz, Nee and Chambers against the word of God, you are almost setting up a false controversy. The question would be entirely different if you were asking whether you should give equal time to reading ancient philosophers, or murder mysteries, as to wholesome spiritual reading.

However, as has been pointed out, even Paul had studied the literature of his day, before he was born again. This gave him a point of contact with not only the greatest he would encounter, but with the ordinary educated man or woman.

The difference in his thinking after he was born again, was stark, in that the disciplines he recommends were not there as some new laws, but as good advice on cultivating the life of God and being renewed in the spirit of our minds. The advice he gave is universally applicable, and covers anything important which we meet today.

Your challenge, then, is to turn this into practical Christian living. If the Holy Spirit gives you permission to read Aristotle, do it with all your heart to the Lord. This isn't a silly suggestion, as you have a good mind, and Augustine based some of his choices on Aristotle's thinking (or not). One of the things most lacking in this generation, is classically educated thinkers who can read the word of God and see all the writers challenging philosophy, some of which greatly affects our age.

But, if the Holy Spirit tells you to read scripture only for six months, you better do that too, with all your heart, unto the Lord....

See what I mean? ;-) It's a challenge - to [u]walk[/u] in the Spirit.

 2007/3/13 8:21
Goldminer
Member



Joined: 2006/11/7
Posts: 1178
Alabama

 Re: The bibilical basis, please, for....



I read many other christian authors and love them, many of the ones mentioned here. I sometimes have two or three going at once, plus what I find online.

I feel that I glean understanding from these men and women that took them a lifetime to learn. I also feel it gives me balance because each has their unique revelation. David Wilkerson, to stay alert; Art Katz, the apostolic; Watchman Nee, the body, soul and spirit and the cross; Madam Guyon, death to self; etc. etc. etc.

I have found that if a person reads only one author or listens to just one preacher they get off balance into only that teachers revelation.

[color=6600CC]themselves, being not baptized of him.[/color][color=6600CC]1Cr 13:9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.[/color]

[color=6600CC]1Cr 13:12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.[/color]

I feel it is seeking wise counsel. I don't have access to these authors personally, but they took the time to make them available through the printed page. Praise the Lord.

I did have a time when God told me not to read anything but the Bible for one year. I did that and it was a rich blessing. Having said that, I believe there is no law here, but each should do individually as God instructs.


_________________
KLC

 2007/3/13 8:35Profile
psalm1
Member



Joined: 2007/1/30
Posts: 1230


 Re: The bibilical basis, please, for....

hi, I have never read Art Katz but you wont go wrong reading Oswald Chambers or Watchman Knee. These are proven men of God.There are 2 problems though in reading books other than the bible.1 is authority. When a person rebukes the devil , Jesus, the blood, and the Word are 3 weapons you might want to use.The other problem is reliability.Even proven ministries are flawed.So I dont know if this helps.one other thing.Sometimes statement seem so pious but are so wrong.I often wondered how peter felt when when Jesus called him the devil.Our pious statements only impress those around us.Have you asked Jesus about this? Remember Jesus IS the Word.This is not a right or wrong issue, in this sense, what is right for me may not necessarily be right for you.Also beware of the competition spirit. You will encounter bretheren in your walk that use "oneupmanship" against you because of "speriority" issues in threir own lives.Not that your brother is doing this but it is very very common.We need to respect each others walk and understand it is rare to find another person at exactly the same place in their walk as we are.I hope there is a "nugget" in this for you .I love you,David

 2007/3/13 9:08Profile
CJaKfOrEsT
Member



Joined: 2004/3/31
Posts: 901
Melbourne, Australia

 Re: The bibilical basis, please, for....

Firstly, I'll cite Oswald Chambers:

Quote:

Major John Skidmore, the League’s secretary in Manchester, shared a “no-holds-barred” relationship with Oswald Chambers. There was nothing they couldn’t tell each other—a rare gift for two men in the sometimes repressive atmosphere of the day and the holiness movement itself.

When Skidmore found himself in a mental cul de sac, emptied by his role of continually giving the truth out to others, he shared his dilemma with Chambers.

“What do you read?” Oswald asked.

“Only the Bible and books directly associated with it,” Skidmore told him.

“That’s the trouble,” Chambers replied. “You have allowed part of your brain to stagnate for want of use.”

Within a few minutes, Oswald had scribbled out a list of more than fifty books—philosophical, psychological, and theological, dealing with every phase of current thought. In a follow-up letter to Skidmore, Oswald said: “My strong advice to you is to soak, soak, soak in philosophy and psychology, until you know more of these subjects than ever you need consciously to think. It is ignorance of these subjects on the part of ministers and workers that has brought our evangelical theology to such a sorry plight.

“[u]When people refer to a man as ‘a man of one book,’ meaning the Bible, he is generally found to be a man of multitudinous books, which simply isolates the one Book to its proper grandeur. The man who reads only the Bible does not, as a rule, know it or human life.[/u]”

[b]Abandoned to God. Marshall Morgan and Scott.[/b]



Secondly, the Apostle Paul:

Quote:

For in him we live, and move, and have our being; [u]as certain also of your own poets have said,[/u] For we are also his offspring.
[b]Acts 17:28[/b]



It would seem that not only did the Apostle Paul read the KJV, but he also heeded the advice of "the OC".

:-P


_________________
Aaron Ireland

 2007/3/13 9:27Profile
rookie
Member



Joined: 2003/6/3
Posts: 4821
Savannah TN

 Re:

Quote:
“When people refer to a man as ‘a man of one book,’ meaning the Bible, he is generally found to be a man of multitudinous books, which simply isolates the one Book to its proper grandeur. The man who reads only the Bible does not, as a rule, know it or human life.”



A man of western culture might say this. One who has had the trappings of an affluent society.

Yet as Scriptures states, there is nothing new under the sun. Scripture points not only to the paths of righteousness but also the paths of darkness.

Isn't it true that Christianity in the west is but a faint glimmer to what it once was. And isn't it true that the poorest places on earth are also the fountain for the most powerful churchs today. I have heard of prayers in the chinese church that God would send them bibles. I have heard the testimony of K.P. Yohanan, where he once cherished a library of christian books. One day he came to the realization that it was all vanity.

My point in this matter is that one may read what he likes, expecially pretaining to the wisdom of this world. The Scriptures will in contrast show you the darkness that are contained in such books.

I myself have read books of Tozer, Katz, Murray, Sanders, and others, all of which were edifying to a point. But as one continues on, one realizes that these books pale in comparison to the Holy Scriptures.

In terms of listening to sermons, there is some fruit in that also. Yet it is only a shadow compared to the Holy Scriptures.

So like the Psalmist of 119, I have been promised that there exists a treasure beyond understanding for those whose eyes fail in searching out that treasure in Scripture.

So I do not agree with the person that is quoted.

In Christ
Jeff


_________________
Jeff Marshalek

 2007/3/14 6:39Profile





All sermons are offered freely and all contents of the site
where applicable is committed to the public domain for the
free spread of the gospel.