Poster | Thread | Logic Member
Joined: 2005/7/17 Posts: 1791
| Re: | | Stever wrote: Quote:
If you can find scripture proof text of why I should not, or why I can not, then we have something to discuss. Otherwise, it is nothing more than he-said, she-said.
How can I find scripture proof text for these valid question?
They are the most basic and simple questions that anybody can answer that aprooves the thing that the questions are towards.
[b]1:[/b] How does pleading the blood help those who do not have the blood?
[b]2:[/b] How does pleading the blood help in situations?
[b]3:[/b] How is Pleading the blood (that which cleanses us from sin) taking hold of authority?
[b]4:[/b]Why would you need to take hold of what we already have?
[b]5:[/b]when God sees the blood in the first place, what is the need to plead it? He is the one you are pleading to. |
| 2006/6/30 22:24 | Profile |
| Re: | | Stever responds to Dorcas:
To correct my error (heard from a sermon of many years ago), God actually provided [b][color=CC0000]HIS OWN BLOOD, that indwelt Christ[/color][/b]. Since He is God, He can do anything- He is the true "Miracle Worker". He is outside of time and space and is responsible for the daily miracles we all see- the healing of the sick, the restoration of vision to the blind, and probably the most important of all is the redeeming of fallen man to Himself.
The teaching is found in Acts 20:28 where it tells us specifically that God has purchased the Church with HIS OWN BLOOD (not part Mary's blood and part His blood, but by ALL HIS OWN BLOOD):
"28. Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, [b][color=CC0000]which he hath purchased with HIS OWN BLOOD[/color][/b]."
God bless,
Stever :-D
[b][color=CC3300]Adrian Rodgers from his sermon--"Power In The Blood":[/color][/b]
"What I am trying to say, it is the father that determines the blood and the blood that flows through the veins of the Lord Jesus Christ was blood that was contributed by God, Almighty. And you see, that blood that was in Jesus was divine blood, it was sacred blood, it was the blood of God; the blood of God you say, wait a minute pastor, God is a spirit and God doesn't have blood. He did when JESUS was here on this earth and if you will read in Acts the 20TH chapter Paul is talking to those Ephesian elders, I think about verse 28 and he says you take care that you feed the church of God which he has purchased with his blood, [i][b]with his blood . The church was purchased with the blood of God. It's sacred blood and because it is sacred blood, it is saving blood! You see, had that blood not been sacred blood it could have saved no one because Jesus Christ had to be innocent in order to die for our sin!"[/b][/i]
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx by dorcas on 2006/6/30 17:10:05
Hi Stever,
You said this (in slightly different words)
Quote: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The father always supplies the blood type of the child. Christ's father was the Holy Ghost, and Jesus Christ carried the blood of God in His veins. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in FOC's 'Literalism without Context' thread, and I responded, (fyi).
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?mode=viewtopic&topic_id=10731&forum=36&start=30&viewmode=flat&order=0
Perhaps you could reply there, not to divert this topic too far? Thanks.
|
| 2006/6/30 22:57 | |
| Re: | | Logic posted:
2: How does pleading the blood help in situations?
3: How is Pleading the blood (that which cleanses us from sin) taking hold of authority?
4:Why would you need to take hold of what we already have?
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Stever responds:
His blood gives power over the devil. Its the blood that Satan fears. Revelation 12:11 says, And they overcame him [Satan] by the blood of the Lamb
The devil doesnt want you to learn about the blood. He hates it!
God bless,
Stever :-D
P.S. Do you believe that the devil is alive and well on planet earth today?
|
| 2006/7/1 0:48 | | philologos Member
Joined: 2003/7/18 Posts: 6566 Reading, UK
| Re: | | Quote:
Here we see a picture of the cross. In ancient Egypt the Jews lived in homes with a BASON, right in the middle of the doorway. Here we see that the lamb is sacrificed in the doorway, his throat is slit, over the basin, and the blood drains into the basin. Hyssop is used to dip into the blood and to paint it on the Lintel (the top of the doorway), as well as on the two side posts of the doorway. Blood is sitting in the BASON, in the bottom of the doorway, in the middle of it. Blood is applied on the left and right side of the doorway. Blood is applied at the very top of the doorway, on the lintel. This has created a picture of the Cross!
So you really mean this illustrates the cross rather than it being a picture of the cross. The shape is all wrong for it to be a picture. So this whole idea is built upon the speculation that Israelite homes were ordered like ordinary Egyptian homes. So this idea is speculation based on speculation... that Israelites had such a bason... that the blood of the passover lamb was poured into it... etc. Sheer speculation.
A careful reading of the text will show that the bason held the blood of the lamb but that not every household sacrificed a lamb. (Ex 12:4) The blood, indeed was to be splashed on the upper lintel and the vertical doorposts, but many households would have had no bason and no blood in the bason. Many of these smaller households would have had blood on the doorposts and lintel but no bason.
Let me make it plain that I believe passionately in 'blood covenant'. What I do not believe in is this wild conjecture and the pentecostal/charismatic ritual of 'pleading the blood'. _________________ Ron Bailey
|
| 2006/7/1 3:53 | Profile | philologos Member
Joined: 2003/7/18 Posts: 6566 Reading, UK
| Re: | | Quote:
You bet I do. We are all born sinners, on our way to hell. Each of us has inherited the sin nature passed down to us by Adam's blood.
You are mixing together truth and error. I believe in congenital sin, but none of the remainder of this sentence has no biblical basis.
Nowhere does it say that the consequence of congenital sin is hell. Nowhere does it say that we 'inherit the sin nature' Nowhere does it say that the sin nature was in Adam's blood.
You are concluding that what bible students refer to as the 'transmission' of congenital sin is in the male bloodline. There is no biblical proof for this theory. _________________ Ron Bailey
|
| 2006/7/1 3:57 | Profile |
| Re: | | Stever's response to Philologos:
The Bible screams at us, from one end to the other, that man is hopeslessly fallen and in need of a Savior.
All of mankind has the DNA of Adam in our veins, and we all require The Savior. Adam sinned, and brought mankind down with him. Christ was born sinless, and became the sinless substitute for man, and provides redemption for those that believe in Him.
Today we (all humans) are on a journey, going in ONE OF TWO DIRECTIONS. 1) Those that believe in Jesus Christ and the work that He did at Calvary-that believe in His shed blood, death and resurrection--are on their way to heaven and eternal life. 2) Those that do not believe in Jesus Christ, but in their own works, are on their way to hell and eternal judgment.
There are no other choices, there are no other directions to be traveled by man.
We each have a choice and the only reason we are born and have life is to have the opportunity to make THIS CHOICE.
I am in agreement with Joshua in this matter-- " 15. And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: BUT AS FOR ME AND MY HOUSE, WE WILL SERVE THE LORD.
Philologos, you are sadly mistaken.
God bless,
Stever :-D xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Quote:
philologos wrote:
Quote:
You bet I do. We are all born sinners, on our way to hell. Each of us has inherited the sin nature passed down to us by Adam's blood.
You are mixing together truth and error. I believe in congenital sin, but none of the remainder of this sentence has no biblical basis.
Nowhere does it say that the consequence of congenital sin is hell. Nowhere does it say that we 'inherit the sin nature' Nowhere does it say that the sin nature was in Adam's blood.
You are concluding that what bible students refer to as the 'transmission' of congenital sin is in the male bloodline. There is no biblical proof for this theory.
|
| 2006/7/1 8:29 | |
| Re: | | Stever responds to Philologos:
Scripture tells me that each Israelite home had a BASON. If they didn't the instructions would have addressed this issue in specific detail because their lives depended upon it:
Exodus 22. And ye shall take a bunch of hyssop, and dip it in the blood that is in the BASON, and strike the lintel and the two side posts with the blood that is in the BASON; and none of you shall go out at the door of his house until the morning. 23. For the Lord will pass through to smite the Egyptians; and when he seeth the blood upon the lintel, and on the two side posts, the Lord will pass over the door, and will not suffer the destroyer to come in unto your houses to smite you. 24. And ye shall observe this thing for an ordinance to thee and to thy sons for ever. 25. And it shall come to pass, when ye be come to the land which the Lord will give you, according as he hath promised, that ye shall keep this service. 26. And it shall come to pass, when your children shall say unto you, What mean ye by this service? 27. That ye shall say, It is the sacrifice of the Lord's passover, who passed over the houses of the children of Israel in Egypt, when he smote the Egyptians, and delivered our houses. And the people bowed the head and worshipped.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Philologos, you are the one guilty of conjecture when you put your own understanding into the Bible, specifically:
"So you really mean this illustrates the cross rather than it being a picture of the cross. The shape is all wrong for it to be a picture. So this whole idea is built upon the speculation that Israelite homes were ordered like ordinary Egyptian homes. So this idea is speculation based on speculation... that Israelites had such a bason... that the blood of the passover lamb was poured into it... etc. Sheer speculation"
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx God commanded all of the Israelites to put the shed blood into the BASON. There is no wiggle room here. Their lives depended upon it.
The works of Trumbull and others have found historical evidence that such basins existed in the homes of people living in the countries of Egypt, Philistia, and other countries in the Middle East at that time, and also in Israel later.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Philologos, are you aware that the encampment of the Israelites was that of the shape of the Cross of Jesus Christ?
Numbers 2 Encampment in the Wilderness The Hebrews, and later the Israelites, had a slightly different way of looking at things. If you or I were told to camp on the east side of something, we would probably mentally draw a line from north to south, and figure that anywhere on the east side of that line would be camping on the east.
Not so the Hebrews. Told to camp on the east side of the tabernacle and its surrounding Levites, They mentally drew two lines from east to west, the width of the tabernacle plus the Levites. Anything east of the tabernacle between those two lines would be east. North of the north line would be the north-east, or south of the south line would be southeast, and thus not where God commanded.
So when the three combined tribes under Judah camped to the east of the tabernacle, they spread out in a narrow band directly east of the tabernacle, and the three who camped to the west did the same, and the north, and south.
If one looks at the numbers in each camp, figures the approximate space required for each family or tent, etc. one can with some accuracy determine the general layout of the entire encampment.
As it turns out, when drawn out on paper, the whole encampment ends up in the shape of a cross, bottom to the east.
Here are the numbers of people in each of the 4 camps (the numbers are for the males only, and do not include women and children).
.....................N .................157,600 E 186,400....Levites...108,100 W .................151,450 ....................S
When Balaam went up on the mount to try and curse the Israelites, this is what he saw--a Cross. Their encampment was a picture of the Savior to come, the Seed of the Woman, who would have his heel bruised! Crucifixion is the only form of captial punishment that incurs teriffic bruising of the heel. On the cross, the victim is suffocating to death. In order to breath, he has to push with his heel into the cross, in order to push his body upward, to continue to breath.
God bless,
Stever :-D
Quote:
philologos wrote:
Quote:
Here we see a picture of the cross. In ancient Egypt the Jews lived in homes with a BASON, right in the middle of the doorway. Here we see that the lamb is sacrificed in the doorway, his throat is slit, over the basin, and the blood drains into the basin. Hyssop is used to dip into the blood and to paint it on the Lintel (the top of the doorway), as well as on the two side posts of the doorway. Blood is sitting in the BASON, in the bottom of the doorway, in the middle of it. Blood is applied on the left and right side of the doorway. Blood is applied at the very top of the doorway, on the lintel. This has created a picture of the Cross!
So you really mean this illustrates the cross rather than it being a picture of the cross. The shape is all wrong for it to be a picture. So this whole idea is built upon the speculation that Israelite homes were ordered like ordinary Egyptian homes. So this idea is speculation based on speculation... that Israelites had such a bason... that the blood of the passover lamb was poured into it... etc. Sheer speculation.
A careful reading of the text will show that the bason held the blood of the lamb but that not every household sacrificed a lamb. (Ex 12:4) The blood, indeed was to be splashed on the upper lintel and the vertical doorposts, but many households would have had no bason and no blood in the bason. Many of these smaller households would have had blood on the doorposts and lintel but no bason.
Let me make it plain that I believe passionately in 'blood covenant'. What I do not believe in is this wild conjecture and the pentecostal/charismatic ritual of 'pleading the blood'.
|
| 2006/7/1 8:59 | | philologos Member
Joined: 2003/7/18 Posts: 6566 Reading, UK
| Re: | | Quote:
The Bible screams at us, from one end to the other, that man is hopeslessly fallen and in need of a Savior.
The Bible never screams at anyone.
Quote:
All of mankind has the DNA of Adam in our veins, and we all require The Savior.
You are making SIN a physical condition. Things that happen to one individual do not automatically pass on to his descendents. I have a full set of ribs, for example. :-)
The word used in Romans 5:12 and translated 'passed upon all men' is [url=]dierchomai[/url] which pass 'to pass through'. The hyperlink here will show you how the word is used biblically. You are presuming that it means 'passed down to' but that would be an entirely different word. You are teaching that Adam's sin passed down to all men, subsequently, generation by generatin. The bible does not describe the transmission of 'original/congential sin' in this way. The word used means that it passed 'through' all men instantly... at the time of Adam's disobedience. I did not die spiritually, consequently to Adam's sin; I died simultaneously. It was a death in the spirit NOT in his DNA. Physical death became the experience of all but spiritual death did not BECOME our experience; it always was our experience.
If you think that SIN in is the DNA I can understand why you think the DNA characteristics of Christ's blood might cure the problem. Christ, of course, received his DNA from Mary. The Catholics got themselves into this theological mess and extricated themselves by inventing the 'immaculate conception'; the notion that Mary was without sin at the time of Christ's conception. O what a tangled web we weave when we build human speculations into divine revelation!
Quote:
Philologos, you are sadly mistaken.
I may be mistaken, but I am not sad. :-D _________________ Ron Bailey
|
| 2006/7/1 9:13 | Profile |
| Re: | | Philologos posted:
"If you think that SIN in is the DNA I can understand why you think the DNA characteristics of Christ's blood might cure the problem. Christ, of course, received his DNA from Mary. "
Stever's response:
God's Word tells me us that Christ carried God's blood in His veins, not Mary's. Christ redeems fallen man with His own Blood, that had nothing to do with Mary:
Acts 20:27-28 " 27. For I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God. 28. Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, [b][color=990000]which he hath purchased with his own blood[/color][/b]."
God bless,
Stever :-D |
| 2006/7/1 9:20 | | dohzman Member
Joined: 2004/10/13 Posts: 2132
| Re: | | Brother Stever did you take the time to read Ex12:4??? You might want to do that :-) _________________ D.Miller
|
| 2006/7/1 9:22 | Profile |
|