SermonIndex Audio Sermons
SermonIndex - Promoting Revival to this Generation
Give To SermonIndex
Discussion Forum : General Topics : "Pre-Fall Children"--why not? (not for the faint of heart or faith.)

Print Thread (PDF)

Goto page ( 1 | 2 | 3 Next Page )
PosterThread
TS
Member



Joined: 2006/2/12
Posts: 49


 "Pre-Fall Children"--why not? (not for the faint of heart or faith.)

One prior thought to at least wonder about...the bible says the serpent came to eve and said...if you think about this; why was eve not surprised that a serpent was talking?...could we surmise possibly that some if not all animals spoke prior to the fall? If they did not why would eve (being so intellectually advanced as we have likely have agreed upon---prior statements in "dino-talk") have not been wary if not frightened or at least think this itself is not right that a serpent should be talking to me?

not critical to salvation or ones faith but interesting to think on and open the mind a little to think out of the box but not out of the Bible.



THE QUESTION OF PRE-FALL CHILDREN
By TS

Is it biblical that Adam and Eve bore children prior to the Cain and Abel listed after the fall of man? This is the question to be explored, looked at non-traditionally and set before the reader in a way which brings glory to the Lord even as it challenges the common thought of the day. Some key thoughts in opening the possibility of a pre-fall race of man are as follows. God made man and woman on the 6th day and told them to be fruitful and multiply, the time period between this event and the fall (as defined by the “eating of the fruit”) is not recorded. Now you have a situation because of the fall God places a curse upon women to bear children from this point on in pain and suffering, impressing upon a critical readers mind that there was a time of “birthing” without pain. Consider also the fact that Cain assumed as the firstborn of Adam and Eve (though not biblically defined as such), had sexual relations with his wife and at that time was building a city which he named after his first born Enoch…who exactly comprised this city he was building. To the above concepts one must think of the Nephilum (giants), the time of Lucifer’s fall from Heaven, and the creation of time itself as known within the human paradigm. By no means will this be comprehensive in its exegesis on the subject but rather hopes to provoke in the reader a mindset that allows the God of all creation to burst out of the confines humans hold Him in with their finite thinking.
On the 6th day of Creation……So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which us upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherin there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. And God saw everything that he had made, and, behold it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. (Genesis 1: 27-31, KJV, 1850 revision) This text is weighty in that it opens questions that should be looked at specifically as they correlate to the creation detailed in chapter two. Upon reading chapter two it can be surmised that God made the animals, made the Adam and charged him with naming the animals, then put man to sleep and made Eve from Adam, and blessed them and told them to reproduce, on the sixth day. The traditional retelling of the creation story follows along this line: God created everything over the first five days, the sixth day God created man and over a period of time Adam named the animals after which God found that it was not good for man to be alone so He put him to sleep and created Eve from Adam. The critical point overlooked is the fact that the Bible states Adam and eve were created on the same sixth day and that all the animals were named prior to Eve’s creation. One must think of the “time” involved for Adam to name the wondrous creatures God had made even within the perfected state of his being. Can we so unjustly assume that Adam was callous and simply even glibly doled out names for the animals as one might recite an alphabet. Even with such a hideous thought in mind could there possibly be enough time to name the thousands of animals in the hours left on that sixth day as human reckoning acknowledges a day? I believe not. I am convinced that Adam did indeed give thought to each and every animal but spent considerable “time” admiring the beautifully strange and diverse creatures God called to parade before this first man. After this Adam was put to sleep and Eve created of him, being given to Adam as his helper, still within the context of the sixth day. We have realized a first problem in the fact that humans now compartmentalize time to seconds, minutes, hours, and days. With this definition of time there is not any way that Adam could have named the animals with the portion of the day (as we know the term day) left and still allowed time for Eve to be created. At this time we must step out of our comfort zone regarding time defined. What if time had not been created as of yet? Time is absolutely a creation of God, one in which he has blessed us with though caused by our own rebellion. Without time having been created just one unthinkable aspect would be that there could be no ending or end of one “period” allowing for another. If after the fall time did not start clicking redemption could not come. It was prophesied that at a certain time the messiah would come, first to be offered a sacrifice for mans sin, then to come yet again at an “appointed” time to judge and rule and yet again to rule for only a period of time (1000 years). After this eternity will move into place….where time will again be restored to a place of “no relevance”. For how will you count to eternity? What number will be used to grasp the time which would transpire if it was yet measured in eternity as it is measured now within the realm of man. The point can be made without heresy that a day is truly as 1000 years to God and that before time came into being it could have taken a million of what we might call hours to complete the cycle of a day…..the earth spinning in its cycle creating morning, noon and night. If this be true the idea that animals and humans being made and the naming of all the animals happening within a day can be grasped logically. God is the ruler of time, time does not rule the Un-Created One as it does within creation. Think on the fact that God clearly states the days will be shortened at the end of the age so that man is not destroyed. Does this mean there will be fewer hours in the day, or that time itself will be sped up so that an hour no longer takes an hour to go through the hour glass?
With the idea of time now being redefined we see that other possibilities can now exist with no lapse in logic or critical thinking needed to fit creation into our finite understanding. After Adam so aptly named the creatures he now was able to commune with the creature God saved for last. The idea that His creation went from good to better in the period he spent creating should allow one to wonder at the beauty and fullness of creation God bestowed upon that which would be a helper to man. This combined with a Garden tilled by the creator Himself as a home for them allowed for perfect circumstances to develop in which the man would know the woman and offspring would follow. The idea that the “day” after Adam and Eve were created was when they sinned is ludicrous, yet most often held either consciously or subconsciously to be true. Could you imagine that after being created you open your eyes and gaze upon God, not as a baby uncomprehending the father’s eyes of love but as a fully mature human complete with perfect emotions with which you could grasp the love emanating towards you from this Eternal Father. This is the case with Adam, after which he is bestowed all power and dominion over all of creation and doubly blessed with the most beautiful woman made to exactly complement the areas in the heart that makes man what he is. The celebration continues with the gift of a home: the Garden of Eden.
The Creator now was able to commune with His creation, actually and experientially walking in the cool of the day with Adam and Eve. Words are as a dry well in the desert when used to describe what free and perfect communion is like with God. Yet we are to think, I believe because of the very sin nature we have, that man so quickly abandoned this in order to rebel against their Friend and God by doing the only thing He commanded them not to do. One could surmise that a great period of fellowship ensued after creation, one which allowed for the world to be filled with the children of Eve. Would the joy of watching, even participating in the multiplication of His creation be limited to a fallen man reproducing in sorrow and pain as one would have to believe if there were no children prior to the fall? Why would God not be blessed as He watched his creation grow, multiply, and subdue the earth as He directed?
Segueing into the realm of Lucifer is of importance at this point. On the sixth day God, after his creation was complete, announced that it was “very good.” This again establishes an area of thought that must be considered; could His creation have been “good” if Lucifer had already fallen? I believe it could not have been. Lucifer, after his rebellion was sent out of heaven and into the “atmosphere” of creation. If a fallen creation had already been imposed upon the earth within the six days of creation then it could not be perfect and good, for it was already in a degenerative state of order. I submit that the creation of man as a creation being lesser than the angels yet eternal and made in the image of the creator in a manner that the angels (servants of God) were not, contributed to, possibly even initiated the sin of pride within the angel of light who was Lucifer. When this pride grew and exalted itself above the Creator he and a third of the angels were expelled from the Kingdom of God to the Kingdom of Man. Within this latter kingdom at a point that is not defined Satan tempted man to disobey the only law imposed on them to that point. How long was the influence of Satan and his angels in the atmosphere prior to this point? What if the world was populated, the children of eve outside the garden…filling the earth as described and were at this point, as the scripture references, “angels knowing the daughters of man”, enticed to have relations with these fallen angels creating the race known as Nephilim? (Genesis 6:1-4)
With the fall of man conceptually behind us we move into the realm of the curse. God told Eve that in pain and sorrow would she now bear children. After the curses, consequential to their sin was pronounced we move to the birth of Cain and Abel. Again the misconceived idea of these sons being the firstborn is carried into our thoughts not based on biblical insight but upon the assumed obvious fact that if the bible did not list any previous children then these are the firstborn. If indeed they were the firstborn how could the bible have not communicated this to us? In the chronologies of the bible it is usually narrated in a manner that states the firstborn as clearly defined from the rest of the siblings, reference Cain and Abel may not have been the first born but only the first born since the fall. The bible simply states that Adam knew Eve and she bore a son Cain and again bore a son Abel. What is noted in these scriptures (Genesis 4:1-2) is that Eve said ”and with the Lord’s help I have given birth to a man,” again almost insinuating that prior to the fall she did not need the Lords help. (As in perfect environment, free from pain and sorrow). Later in the same chapter of Genesis Cain kills Abel and goes away to the Land of Nod, east of Eden. So after the only other person listed as being alive in the entire world is killed, Cain takes a wife and moves to the city he was building. Where did Cain get a wife, who was in the city he was building, and who named this land Nod?
It all leads one to believe that there was more on the earth than you would think.
Knowing the bible as a book describing a love story; the love of the creator towards his creation we should not put blinders on our mind when it comes to thinking of creation and pro-creation. When we can trust God as being good and merciful, striving always to allow His creation to commune with Himself then we can look at the options left us in the Book of Genesis. These options though thought provoking do not hinder in any way the Book as a whole but rather allow the created mind of man to reach into the un-created mind of the Father. As one does not know what eternity future holds one can only equally surmise thoughts based on bits of attainable information about eternity past.

 2006/2/13 22:35Profile
Greenquality
Member



Joined: 2006/1/26
Posts: 189
mountains of Pa.

 Re: "Pre-Fall Children"--why not? (not for the faint of heart or faith.)

# 1 was adam created on the 6 day? where did cain get a wife? were cain and abel twins? I think man was created on the 6 day,but adam was created on the eighth day!I think cain and abel are twin!and is the main subject of the post about (the serpent seed?)

 2006/2/14 18:43Profile
Billy7
Member



Joined: 2005/8/9
Posts: 61


 Re:

In regards to the age old question, "Where did Cain get a wife"? I heard a good one a while back...

Once upon a time, there was a young street preacher that was on the corner preaching one day when suddenly, he was rudely interrupted by a heckler who said, "Alright preacher, you think you're so smart. Where did Cain get his wife? Pondering for a moment, the young preacher thoughtfully replied, "I don't know, but when I get to heaven I'll be sure and ask him."

Totally unsatisfied with the preacher's answer, the heckler fired back, "Well what if you die and you get to heaven and Cain isn't there?" To which the preacher immediately replied, "Then I guess that when you die you can ask him.":-P

Personally, When some one ask me, "where did Cain get his wife?" my favorite reply is, "I don't know, but I'd tell you if I was Abel." :-)


_________________
Billy Evans

 2006/2/14 21:53Profile
tacklebox
Member



Joined: 2005/10/8
Posts: 196
Roanoke Rapids, NC

 Re:

Here's a challenging question:

How does pursuing this edify the body of Christ?

Is this just intellectual brain candy or are the motives pure?



-Chris


_________________
Christopher Wright

 2006/2/14 22:25Profile
Greenquality
Member



Joined: 2006/1/26
Posts: 189
mountains of Pa.

 Re:

((((How does this edify the body of Christ?)))for me, It gets me to think & and read Gods word. and also, why do you belive the things you do.so (((when some one ask you where did cain get a wife?)))then you can give a biblcal answer!!!.remember even a (child) will understand God word.and yet it so complexes the human mind.The truth is never ashamed to be tested.This is what got me to read God word 11 years ago.then I got emotionally involed,and then Saved.because I learned to think for my self.and know why do I belive the things I do. reading is one of the greatest gifts ,out there,understanding God word is even greater, (((and doing God word is Blessed.))) so if this challenges some one. get a gear moveing, get some one who never picked up a bible before or used it in away to study to this is where pure motives start!

 2006/2/15 10:47Profile
TS
Member



Joined: 2006/2/12
Posts: 49


 Re:

i am honored and humbled that any would read my little essay...greenquality i appreciate your defense of "having a questioning mind"...my opinion is if there was no one to question what is not obvious (or what even seems obvious) then would the reformation have taken place? or would there be any one ready to be martryed for something just because it is said to be so.

tacklebox...i truly appreciate you question of motive...i hope that my question stems from something God put in my mind/heart when he created me and that these questions are but a reflection back to my creator of what He knows to be true but me in my present physical/temperal body can only wonder. i often wonder whether i have ever had one "pure" motive...this likely is the same reason I can come to my Father and ask him "What was it like before we fell?, how long was it before we acted in rebellion....was there not a long time that we enjoyed being with you?"

I am but dust trying to understand the Eternal...i choose to ask the questions that come to my mind.

As far as edifying to the Body...i picture the body of Christ in America as a 1000 pound man...laying on a couch watching TV...unable to move. If it is not edifying he would not notice...if it is edifying he still would not notice.

billy7----I loved you answer...If i were abel i'd tell you.

we are all but pieces of the body...doing what we do...exhorting, challenging, laughing, asking. when we can work as a whole we would indeed be powerful. i do not believe a unified body, powerful and full of the Spirit will ever exist until we are under persecution. This day is coming soon...the Lord will have His bride..."pure and spotless". he will not come back for a "sullied" maiden as we (the body) now are.

God Bless and even so come!


At least one true motive for posting...is to gain knowledge-sharpen what wits I have...is there anyone who can add or deflect information given in the essay?....think hard...i have only gleaned from the posts thoughts on if this should have even been written...nothing to say why they agree/don't agree and some evidence to support. why is the beginning any less important than the end of which we have so many scholarly opinions floating around. if i was to be save today and the one i talked to could only tell me of the end and nothing of the beginning something would seem wrong.

 2006/2/15 13:20Profile
Billy7
Member



Joined: 2005/8/9
Posts: 61


 Re:

I think it's only natural that we should wonder about things like Cain's wife and dinosaurs, but the reality of the matter is that there are just some things we are not going to know this side of heaven.


_________________
Billy Evans

 2006/2/15 21:08Profile
nacl
Member



Joined: 2006/2/2
Posts: 61
Babylon

 Re: why not

Romans 5:12 "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon [u][b]all[/b][/u] men, for that [u][b]all[/b][/u] have sinned."

In fact read Romans 5:12-19. It tells us throughout that passage that sin entered the world and "all" men through the transgression of one, namely Adam.

If there were "pre-fall" undefiled children, then they wouldn't be considered part of the "all."

There would have been sinless people, but scripture says that "all have sinned."


_________________
D. Bryant

 2006/2/15 22:45Profile
geddingsm
Member



Joined: 2003/11/3
Posts: 61
south carolina

 Re: Cain's wife

Gen. 5:4 ...the days of Adam were eight hundred years;and he HAD SONS AND DAUGHTERS.

Cain married either his sister or a cousin of even a niece. There was no law against what we call incest. The "gene pool" was pure, hence the long lives. Every man who is married is married to his sister in a way.
The question is not that difficult if you look to the Word.

Gen. 4:17 And Cain knew his wife,...
It doesn't say he went away and found a wife. He took her with him.

In Him,
geddingsm


_________________
marvin geddings

 2006/2/16 0:15Profile
nacl
Member



Joined: 2006/2/2
Posts: 61
Babylon

 Re:

Let me say that this is a thought-provoking thread. Interesting in a way we don't often see.

So when I say that I disagree, I say it with love and good-will. It's good for us to use the ol' brain once in a while, think outside the proverbial box.


_________________
D. Bryant

 2006/2/16 0:44Profile





©2002-2024 SermonIndex.net
Promoting Revival to this Generation.
Privacy Policy