SermonIndex Audio Sermons
Image Map
Discussion Forum : Articles and Sermons : Christ’s resurrection, literal, physical, eternal.

Print Thread (PDF)

Goto page ( 1 | 2 | 3 Next Page )
PosterThread









 Christ’s resurrection, literal, physical, eternal.

Norman L. Geisler writes

Down through the centuries orthodox Christians have always confessed with the Apostles’ Creed: “I believe…in the resurrection of the flesh.” This affirmation of faith in the believer’s resurrection is grounded in faith in Christ’s resurrection. A major purpose of the latter resurrection was to make possible the former; thus they are both of the same nature (2 Cor. 4:14; 1 Cor. 15:20-23, 48; Phil. 3:21). The two doctrines are therefore interdependent, and will be treated as one doctrine in this article.
In spite of the historic church’s unwavering belief in the resurrection of the flesh, there are those today who call themselves “orthodox” but do not adhere to the doctrine. In the past, those who deviated from this venerable truth of apostolic Christianity did so by denying the reality of the resurrection. Today, some veer from course by denying its materiality. What makes their view unique is that they affirm an “empty tomb” while ironically denying that a material body emerged from it. In short, while they deny the materiality of the Resurrection they confess its objectivity, and on the basis of this confession they conclude that their faith remains biblical.
Wolfhart Pannenburg is a case in point. He believes Jesus left an empty tomb behind but that the resurrection body was by nature invisible and immaterial. He declares that for Paul “the future body will be a different one from the present body, not a fleshly body — as he says — a ‘spiritual body.'”1 Southern Baptist professor E. Glenn Hinson agrees, adding, “Paul was convinced that the Christ who appeared to him belonged to another order of existence than the Christ the disciples had known in the flesh. The risen Christ has not a physical but a spiritual body.”2 Professor Murray Harris of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School provides yet another example. He argues “that after his resurrection his [Jesus’] essential state was one of invisibility and immateriality.”3 He adds that the resurrection body of Christians “will be neither fleshly nor fleshy“4 (emphasis added). According to this view, Jesus’ resurrection body was not the same physical body He had before His death, but a second embodiment.
Why should these men be classified as “unorthodox” for simply denying that Jesus rose in the same physical body in which He died? Why did Jesus have to rise in the flesh, as long as His tomb was vacated and death was conquered? The answer to these questions has both historical and theological components.
THE CONFESSION OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH
First, the confession of the Christian church is instructive. The church has not only always affirmed the immortality of the resurrection body, but also its materiality. While it has agreed with the apostle that the resurrection body is a “spiritual” (i.e., spirit-directed) body (1 Cor. 15:44), it has never denied that it is a material body.
The Apostolic Testimony
The Christian church has from the beginning confessed that the same physical body of flesh that was laid in Jesus’ tomb was raised immortal. This belief is based on several explicit New Testament references and extensive tangible evidence. Jesus Himself said His resurrection body was one of “flesh and bones” (Luke 24:39; cf. 13:37). Speaking of the resurrection of Christ, Peter insisted that His “flesh did not see corruption” (Acts 2:31). Writing after the Resurrection, John declared that Jesus “came [and remained] in the flesh” (1 John 4:2; cf. 2 John 7). The body that emerged from the tomb on Easter morning was seen (Matt. 28:17), heard (John 20:15-16), and even touched (Matt. 28:9) on many occasions after the Resurrection. Moreover, Jesus ate food at least four times after the Resurrection (Luke 24:30; 24:42-43; John 21:12-13; Acts 1:4). He also showed His crucifixion scars on two occasions, once challenging doubting Thomas: “Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe” (John 20:27).
The “Ante-Nicene” Testimony
Following the apostolic testimony, the church down through the centuries has confessed its belief in “the resurrection of the flesh” — both that of Jesus in particular and of humanity in general. “Ante-Nicene” (i.e., before the 325 A.D. Council of Nicea) father Justin Martyr (A.D. 100-165) said plainly: “The resurrection is a resurrection of the flesh which dies.”5 As for those who “maintain that even Jesus Himself appeared only as spiritual, and not in flesh, but presented merely the appearance of flesh: these persons seek to rob the flesh of the promise.”6 Justin even insisted that Christ’s ascension shows that it is possible “for flesh to ascend into heaven.”7 Tertullian (c. A.D. 160-230) declared the resurrection of the flesh to be the church’s “rule of faith,” saying it “was taught by Christ” and only denied by heretics.8 In his treatise on “The Resurrection of the Dead” (ch. 3), second century Christian teacher Athenagoras concluded that God’s “power is sufficient for the raising of dead bodies, and is shown by the creation of these same bodies. For if, when they did not exist, He made at their first formation the bodies of men, and their original elements, He will, when they are dissolved, in whatever manner that may take place, raise them again with equal ease: for this, too, is equally possible to Him.”9
The “Post-Nicene” Testimony
In the fourth century, The Second Creed of Epiphanius (A.D. 374) confessed that “the Word became flesh,…the same suffered in the flesh; rose again; and went up to heaven in the same body;…is coming in the same body in glory to judge the quick and the dead.”10 Cyril of Jerusalem (A.D. 315-386) considered any view heretical that claims “the resurrection of the Saviour was phantom-wise, and not real, not heeding Paul who says, ‘Who was made flesh of the seed of David according to the flesh;’ and again ‘By the resurrection of Jesus Christ our Lord from the dead.'”11 The preeminent theologian, St. Augustine (A.D. 354-430), declared: “It is indubitable that the resurrection of Christ, and His ascension into heaven with the flesh in which He rose, is already preached and believed in the whole world.” Augustine even held that God would reassemble in the resurrection body “all the portions which have been consumed by beasts or fire, or have been dissolved into dust of ashes….”12
The Medieval Testimony
St. Anselm of Cantebury (A.D. 1033-1109) insisted on the material nature of the resurrection body. Speaking on the topic, “How man will rise with the same body which he has in this world,” he argued that “if a man is to be perfectly restored, the restoration should make him such as he would have been had he never sinned….Therefore, as man, had he not sinned, was to have been transformed with the same body to an immortal state, so when he shall be restored, it must properly be with his own body as he lived in this world.”13 The great theologian, Thomas Aquinas (A.D. 1224-1274), said of the resurrection: “The soul does not take an airy or heavenly body, or a body of another organic constitution, but a human body composed of flesh and bones and the same members enjoyed at present.”14
The Reformation Testimony
The Protestant Reformation continued the orthodox affirmation of the material nature of the resurrection body. The Lutheran Formula of Concord (A.D. 1576) reads: “We believe, teach, and confess…the chief articles of our faith (of Creation, of Redemption, of Sanctification, and the Resurrection of the flesh)….”15 The French Confession of Faith, prepared with the help of John Calvin and approved by the Synod of Paris (A.D. 1559), pronounced that “although Jesus Christ, in rising from the dead, bestowed immortality upon his body, yet it did not take away from the truth of its nature, and we so consider him in his divinity that we do not despoil him of his humanity.”16 The Belgic Confession (A.D. 1561), adopted by the Synod of Dort (A.D. 1619), declares that “all the dead shall be raised out of the earth, and their soul joined and united with their proper bodies in which they formerly lived.”17 Further, the Thirty Nine Articles of Religion of the Church of England (A.D. 1562) confess that “Christ did truly rise again from death, and took again his body, with flesh, bones, and all things appertaining to the perfection of Man’s nature; wherewith he ascended into Heaven….”18 And the Westminster Confession (A.D. 1647) proclaimed that Jesus “was crucified, and died; was buried, and remained under the power of death, yet saw no corruption. On the third day he arose from the dead, with the same body in which he suffered; with which he ascended into heaven….”19
Even some who deny that Christ rose in the flesh admit that “until the time of the Reformation the creeds of the West spoke only of the resurrection of the flesh.”20
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE RESURRECTION OF THE FLESH
Having examined the historical evidence, we must now turn to the theological question: What difference does it make whether Christ arose in the same body of flesh in which He lived and died? The New Testament’s response is clear and unequivocal. Without Christ’s physical resurrection there is no salvation (Rom. 10:9), for the Resurrection is at the very heart of the gospel by which we are saved (1 Cor. 15:1-5). The apostle Paul listed a litany of consequences that follow a denial of the physical resurrection. If Christ did not rise, then :1) Our faith is useless; 2) We are still in our sins; 3) Our departed loved ones are lost; 4) The apostles are false witnesses; and 5) We are the most to be pitied of all men (1 Cor. 15:14-19).
In addition to this sobering list of dire results for denying the literal resurrection, there are some crucial theological problems that follow failure to join the apostolic confession of “the resurrection of the flesh.”
The Problem of Creation
God created the material universe (Gen. 1:1) and pronounced it “very good” (v. 31). Sin, however, brought death and decay to God’s creation: “Sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men….” (Rom. 5:12). Furthermore, because of man’s sin “the creation was subjected to frustration….” (Rom. 8:20). Thus, the creation has been groaning and waiting “to be liberated from its bondage to decay” (v. 21). Likewise, believers “wait eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies. For in this hope we are saved” (vv. 23-24).
Since God’s material creation fell, it is clear that in order for redemption to be effective it must restore this material creation. Humans sin and die in material bodies and they must be redeemed in the same physical bodies. Any other kind of deliverance would be an admission of defeat. Likewise, just as the world God created and which subsequently fell was material, even so God will eventually deliver this material universe from decay by recreating a new heaven and a new earth (Rev. 21:1-4). If redemption does not restore God’s physical creation, including our material bodies, then God’s original purpose in creating a material world would be frustrated. As Professor Robert Gundry aptly noted, “Anything less than that undercuts Paul’s ultimate intention that redeemed man possess physical means of concrete activity for eternal service and worship of God in a restored creation.” So, “to dematerialize resurrection, by any means, is to emasculate the sovereignty of God in both creative purpose and redemptive grace.”21
The Problem of the Incarnation
The denial that Christ came in human flesh is called docetism. Hence, the denial that He rose in human flesh is a kind of neodocetism. Both diminish the full humanity of Christ, one before and the other after His resurrection. A similar doctrinal deviation existed in the first century. John addressed it when he warned against those who deny that ‘Jesus Christ has come [and remains] in the flesh’ (1 John 4:2). The use of the perfect participle (“has come”) implies that Jesus came in the flesh in the past and He remained in the flesh when John penned these words after the Resurrection. In the parallel passage (2 John 7) John used the present tense, warning against those “who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh.” This makes it even clearer that John considered it wrong to deny flesh of Christ either before or after His resurrection. The reason is obvious: human flesh is part of our true human nature as God created it. Hence, to deny that Christ was resurrected in human flesh is to deprive Him of full humanity.
The Problem of Salvation
Among other things, salvation is victory over death (1 Cor. 15:54-55). Since the death which resulted from sin directly involved the material body, the body that is raised again must be material for there to be real victory over death. Failure to confess that Christ rose in a material body undercuts the very gospel itself.
In his definitive work on the nature of “body” (Greek: soma) in the New Testament, Professor Gundry noted that unless Christ rose in the same physical body in which He died, then “the relationship of the two bodies to each other is extrinsic and to that degree unimpressive as a demonstration of Christ’s victory over death.”22 Hence, “the resurrection of Christ was and the resurrection of Christians will be physical in nature.”23 Anything less undercuts God’s redemptive purposes for the human race.
The Problem of Deception
There is also a serious moral problem. Some claim that Christ’s appearances were merely “materializations” aimed at convincing the disciples of His reality but not His materiality. But Jesus said: “Look at my hands and my feet. It is I myself! Touch me and see; a spirit does not have flesh and bones, as you see I have” (Luke 24:27). Jesus challenged Thomas to put his finger into the scar in His hand and to put his hand into the wound in His side and “stop doubting and believe” (John 20:27).
Given the identity of the scars with His preresurrection body, the only impression these words could have left on the disciples’ minds was that Jesus was claiming to have resurrected in the same literal, material body in which He died. However, if He did not rise in this physical body, He was intentionally misleading His disciples. In short, either Jesus rose in the same material body in which He died, or else He lied.
The Problem of Immortality
A denial of the material nature of the resurrection body is fatal for Christian immortality. Unlike the ancient Greeks, Christians believe true immortality involves the whole person, including the body; not just the continuing existence of the soul. But if Christ did not rise in the same physical body in which He died, then we have no real hope that we will ever attain true immortality either. Paul declared that Christ “has brought life and immortality to light through the gospel” (2 Tim. 1:10). It is only through Christ’s victory over physical death that believers can proclaim: “Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting?” (1 Cor. 15:55). Otherwise, as Paul informed the Corinthians, “if Christ has not been raised…those who have fallen asleep in Christ are lost” (1 Cor. 15:18).
The Problem of Verification
A nonmaterial resurrection has no evidential value. If Christ did not rise in the same material body placed in the tomb, then the Resurrection loses its value as an evidence for His claim to be God. However, Jesus often offered His resurrection as a proof of His claims (John 2:19-22; 10:18). On one occasion He offered it as the unique sign of who He is, declaring that no other sign would be given to that unbelieving generation (Matt. 12:40).
The apostles also offered Jesus’ resurrection appearances as “many convincing proofs” (Acts 1:3). They used the Resurrection as the basis of their fearless preaching of Christ over and over again (Acts. 2:22-36; 4:2,10; 13:32-41; 17:1-4,22-31). Paul told the philosophers of his day that God “has given proof…to all men by raising him from the dead” (Acts 17:31).
There is a very good reason for this repeated connection between the fact of the physical resurrection and the truth of Christianity: there is no real evidential difference between an immaterial resurrection and no resurrection at all. An immaterial body has no verifiable connection with a material body. The only objective way the world could know that Christ rose was if He rose in the same material body in which He died. As the poet John Updike powerfully stated,
Make no mistake; if He rose at all
it was as His body,
if the cells’ dissolution did not reverse, the
molecules reknit, the amino acids rekindle,
the Church will fail.
Dr. Geisler is Dean of the Liberty Center for Research and Scholarship and Professor of Philosophy of Religion at Liberty University, Lynchburg, Virginia. He is the author of nearly 30 books, including the forthcoming The Battle for the Resurrection (Thomas Nelson Publishers).

 2016/5/16 17:10
TMK
Member



Joined: 2012/2/8
Posts: 5373
NC, USA

 Re: Christ’s resurrection, literal, physical, eternal.

Is this written for someone's benefit here on the forum? I know of no one who does not believe in a literal bodily resurrection.


_________________
Todd

 2016/5/16 18:17Profile









 Re:

Every resurrection that the Bible speaks of, the same body that died was raised back to life.

It is not another body; that would be a replacement, not a resurrection. The bodies did not disintegrate and neither does the soul.

Look at all the resurrections in the Scripture, they all came back in the same body. No body disappeared then to reappear after as different body or new spirit vaporous and ethereal like body.

1 Cor. 15:12-14 “Now if Christ is preached that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not risen. And if Christ is not risen, then our preaching is empty and your faith is also empty.”
Who and what was raised?

So where did Jesus’ body go when he died if he did not rise literally, bodily but just a spirit being?

Neodocetism does not believe in a resurrection as described in the Bible. Their faith is not a Biblical faith, it is vain (according to 1 Cor.15). To say something like this that the Bible does not even hint at is absurd.

But they not only propose this but “We deny that he was raised in the flesh, and challenge any statement to that effect as being described”

Matt 28:5-6 The angel said to the women, "Do not be afraid, for I know that you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified. He is not here; he has risen, just as he said. (Mk.16:16;Lk.24:6)

So if he has not risen that makes Jesus a liar. That means the neodocetism is contrary to the Bible.

Mark 10:34 They will “kill Him. And the third day He will rise again." The “He” is not a different body but the same body. That’s what a resurrection is, the same body that died is raised back to life (Gr. anastasis soma). Every person Jesus or the apostles raised were in the same body that died.

neodocetism departs from the Bible in the most obtuse manner.

1 John 4:2 says “that every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God.” Verse 3 then states that every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God.”

Those who deny that Jesus came in the flesh are of the anti-Christ spirit. This is one of the ways to discern a false teacher or false teaching on the nature of Jesus.

John is writing after the resurrection and is using perfect tense in Greek, which denotes a past action with continuing results into the present and continuing on into the future. He came in the flesh, rose in the flesh, and is still in the flesh. The same body that He was born and died with, He rose with. If one claims that Christ rose as a spirit creature, and not physically, they are of the anti -Christ spirit and are denying the third point of the Gospel. And they are not saved by the gospel, because they deny it.

The present tense in Greek is applied to something in the past, and continues in the present forever. This same tense is applied to Jesus’ bodily resurrection. 2 Jn.7 also addresses this warning “For many deceivers have gone out into the world who do not confess Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh, this is a deceiver and an antichrist”.

In this epistle John uses the present tense in Greek which focuses specifically on the future coming of the Lord. People who deny Jesus has come in the flesh and rose in spirit, not in the body, are of the spirit of antichrist. (1 Jn. 4:2 focuses on the past, continuing to the future. 2 Jn. 7 focuses specifically on the future). The fact is that Jesus rose again in the same body and is coming back in this SAME body. As Acts 1:11 he will come in the same manner he left, visibly to all with the physical eye and in the Fathers glory which he had before the world began (Jn.17:5,2; Mt 24:30.)

The is another gospel that some here proclaim.

Yes, they speak of Jesus death and a resurrection but the meaning they give is entirely opposed tho the Word of God.

why?

Jesus denied He is a spirit creature Luke 24:39-40 "Behold My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself. Handle Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see I have." When He had said this, He showed them His hands and His feet.

Jesus told them ahead of time Jn.2:19: “Destroy this temple and I will raise it up.” V. 21 “He was speaking of the temple of His body.” The body that was alive at the time he spoke this was what died. It is the same body raised from the dead, because that is what a resurrection means.

1 Peter 3:18 “being put to death in the flesh but made alive by the Spirit”
His body was made alive by the Holy Spirits power. Scripture does not say

Jesus became a living spirit creature, they have intentionally distorted the words because they have a narrative to keep, there own made up belief system.

1 Peter 3:18 But quickened in the spirit zooopoieetheis (NT:2193 a) de (NT:1151) pneumati (NT:4100). First aorist passive participle of [zooopoieoo] rare (Aristotle) verb (from [zooopoios], making alive), to make alive. The participles are not antecedent to apethanen (NT:593), but simultaneous with it. There is no such construction as the participle of subsequent action. The spirit of Christ did not die when his flesh did, but "was endued with new and greater powers of life"(Thayer’s). See 1 Cor 15:22 for the use of the verb for the resurrection of the body.”(Robertson's Word Pictures in the New Testament) underline mine
The body that emerged from the tomb was seen (Matt. 28:17), heard (John 20:15-16), and even touched (Matt. 28:9) on many occasions after the Resurrection. It was the same Jesus that died.

1 Cor. 15:42-45 “So will it be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable; it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body. So it is written: "The first man Adam became a living being"; the last Adam, a life-giving spirit.” Jesus is a life giving spirit to all who believe

Spiritual body in Greek-pnuematikos soma.

1 Cor. 15:44 The resurrection body is not wholly pneuma (NT:4100). Caution is needed here in filling out details concerning the psuchee (NT:5524) and the pneuma (NT:4100). But certainly he means to say that the "spiritual body" has some kind of germinal connection with the "natural body," though the development is glorious beyond our comprehension though not beyond the power of Christ to perform (Phil 3:21)” (from Robertson's Word Pictures in the New Testament)

 2016/5/16 19:46
TMK
Member



Joined: 2012/2/8
Posts: 5373
NC, USA

 Re:

That's all fine- I'm just not sure who you are indicating is a docetist here. I agree that this is error- i am just not sure who your post is directed to, if anyone.


_________________
Todd

 2016/5/16 21:31Profile









 Re:

Just read some of the posts from the last 4-5 months and you will see the few
who are of that spirit. They sound almost orthodox except they deny who Jesus was/is and will forever be. It is not a small matter.

 2016/5/17 9:23
TMK
Member



Joined: 2012/2/8
Posts: 5373
NC, USA

 Re:

I agree with you, if the allegations are true.

Will all the docetists in the forum please stand up.


_________________
Todd

 2016/5/17 11:25Profile









 Re:

These individuals have already clearly expounded this antichrist heresy repeatedly, Just read the posts, the foreign jesus they espouse glows right through as they deny and reject the Jesus Christ of the Bible with their clever doctrinal dissertations denying the person and work of the Lord. Might seem trivial to you but it is anther jesus and another spirit that is being promoted.

 2016/5/17 11:44
TMK
Member



Joined: 2012/2/8
Posts: 5373
NC, USA

 Re:

Once again, I agree with you 100% if the allegations are true. I would even say docetism is heresy, and I don't say that word lightly.

Perhaps you could provide some quotes of posts that clearly indicate docetism. To accuse someone of heresy requires pretty convincing evidence.


_________________
Todd

 2016/5/17 12:23Profile









 Re:

As per the comments of the moderator and some others naming names is not
permisable. However the numerous statements aligning themselves with this spirit and teaching can be located using the search function on Sermon Index. By quoting them myself I am in fact identifying the practitioners of these strange antichrist doctrines. You can email me if you would like direct quotes.

 2016/5/17 14:25









 Re:

"So where did Jesus’ body go when he died if he did not rise literally, bodily but just a spirit being?"

Good question. If his physical body dissipated and rotted according to the spiritual resurrection proponents suggest then they are clearly denying Christ and are antichrist as 1 John states.

You also posted this and it is very true:

" John 4:2 says “that every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God.” Verse 3 then states that every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God.”

Those who deny that Jesus came in the flesh are of the anti-Christ spirit. This is one of the ways to discern a false teacher or false teaching on the nature of Jesus.

John is writing after the resurrection and is using perfect tense in Greek, which denotes a past action with continuing results into the present and continuing on into the future. He came in the flesh, rose in the flesh, and is still in the flesh. The same body that He was born and died with, He rose with. If one claims that Christ rose as a spirit creature, and not physically, they are of the anti -Christ spirit and are denying the third point of the Gospel. And they are not saved by the gospel, because they deny it.

The present tense in Greek is applied to something in the past, and continues in the present forever. This same tense is applied to Jesus’ bodily resurrection. 2 Jn.7 also addresses this warning “For many deceivers have gone out into the world who do not confess Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh, this is a deceiver and an antichrist”.

In this epistle John uses the present tense in Greek which focuses specifically on the future coming of the Lord. People who deny Jesus has come in the flesh and rose in spirit, not in the body, are of the spirit of antichrist. (1 Jn. 4:2 focuses on the past, continuing to the future. 2 Jn. 7 focuses specifically on the future). The fact is that Jesus rose again in the same body and is coming back in this SAME body. As Acts 1:11 he will come in the same manner he left, visibly to all with the physical eye and in the Fathers glory which he had before the world began (Jn.17:5,2; Mt 24:30.)"




 2016/5/17 17:25





©2002-2020 SermonIndex.net
Promoting Genuine Biblical Revival.
Privacy Policy