My instinct is to trust Ravi Zacharias' spirit in this enounter. He is a wonderfully able communicator and his work on post-modernism is very valuable. SIers unfamiliar with his organisation can find more at RZIMI am always uncomfortable when people claim to make statements or apologies on my behalf so I am much less comfortable with Mouw's contribution. I would need to have much more specific information for an apology than vague comments about misrepresentation of the Mormon position.
My instinct is to trust Ravi Zacharias' spirit in this enounter. He is a wonderfully able communicator and his work on post-modernism is very valuable.
_________________Robert Wurtz II
Re: Well said.My sentiments as well You can make a snake a pet but don't trust it,it'll still bite you given the chance.Mr. Mouw wants too say some thing I wish he would own HIS words and not speak for me.
Hi Raven,Think that's where this can get all off track. Just in the same sense that I wouldn't particualrly want the WOF camp speaking on my behalf, my sense was that [i]'often'[/i](his word) is not a reach nor would I expect that to apply to all of us. As was alluded, we don't have the full comments and just as surely they have '[i]often[/i]' misrepresented 'us' I am sure...and no, I am not speaking for you either brother ;-)Ravi is not one I would find being to chummy with all this and you can bet he left them with plenty to think about.
"Ravi is not one I would find being to chummy with all this and you can bet he left them with plenty to think about."Yes indeed I like Ravi, I believe he speaks the truth.I was speaking about the other speaker, just wish some(HE) would own his words and not generalize and say we, but say Me,I or myself.