Santa Clara, CA
| The Great Gospel Deception ~ David Servant|
A bit of background. If you look to your bottom left on the main page there is a listing of "[b]Other Ministries[/b], one of which is [url=http://www.orphanstear.org/]Orphans Tear[/url]. Tremendous work and service and if anyone is looking for a place to support, all of them are fine ministries.
Received a recent, small magazine\periodical that they produce and found a mention that caught my eye, it was entitled "[i]An American Pastor Repents[/i]". The gist of it was concerning a pastor on vacation who came across the above titled book and was profoundly convicted apparently while reading a portion of it in a certain bookstore. He insisted on speaking with the owner right away and some 5 days later returned to confess his sins which included an addiction to Internet porn.
The following is the first chapter and is available online for [i]free[/i] but also available for purchase in book form. Will provide the link at bottom. Also, in keeping with the author's wishes will keep this 'intact' but spread over two consecutive posts for our more ... attention deficient readers (It's really a trick that makes it seem like you are reading a shorter post).
[b]The Great Gospel Deception[/b]
It was, with little doubt, the most devious deception of the past century, a devilish scheme perpetrated upon trainloads of trusting men, women and children. It happened on the outskirts of a Polish town named Oswieçim during the Second World War. There, under the direction of Adolf Hitler, a slave labor camp was established for people he considered subhuman. It was only after the wars end that the world would learn all the shocking facts of that place, known today by its German name, [i]Auschwitz[/i].
Auschwitz was much more than a labor camp. The primary industry there was murder. At least one million people who walked through the wrought-iron gates of Auschwitz never made it out alive. The large majority of them didnt have a clue that they and their families would be dead within hours of their arrival.
Gathered from all over Nazi-occupied Europe, Jewish families were transported to Auschwitz in crowded freight and cattle cars. Upon arrival, all newcomers were immediately separated into two groups. To one side went the minorityonly those men who appeared to be able to withstand heavy labor. To the other side went everyone else. They were the men of small frame, the women, the sick, frail, and elderly, as well as babies and children who wept as they were separated from their strong fathers.
The larger of the two groups was then herded to another place in the camp where their eyes fell upon a puzzling scene. Before them was a small orchestra of young women, neatly dressed, playing an upbeat, joyful tune. Each girl was concentrating intenselyalmost too intenselyon the pages of music before her, seemingly oblivious to the hundreds of people who were now their audience.
An apologetic announcement was made: There had been an infestation of lice in the camp, and everyone must be disinfected in a communal shower before being admitted to the living quarters. Instructed to disrobe, each Jewish family neatly folded its clothes and placed them on a table with their other personal belongings. They were assured that their embarrassment would be over in just a few minutes, once they were sprayed with a harmless disinfectant.
As many as two thousand people at a time were paraded, naked, through the doors of a large, low building that was built into a hillside. Above the door a sign, bordered neatly with flowers, said BATHS. Once the last person was inside, the doors were slid shut and locked securely.
The orchestra stopped playing.
Through vents from above, Nazi workers dropped a small quantity of Zyklon B crystals, a poison manufactured for killing rodents. Inside, deadly vapors of hydrocyanic gas began to waft from the ceilings.
The clusters of Jewish families quickly realized something was very wrong. People began coughing, then choking convulsively and vomiting. Shouting and screaming in terror, the panicked crowd instinctively surged toward the sealed doors they had entered. The victims pushed, clawed, and climbed over each other, hoping desperately to escape their sure fate. Many quickly met their death, crushed on the concrete floor by the onrush. For the more aggressive, the hellish battle raged on a while longer.
After twenty-three minutes, all struggle ceased and the room was silent. The doors slid open, and workers dressed in gas masks and rubber boots entered to begin their gruesome task of disentangling the piles of contorted bodies and transporting them to nearby incinerators.
Finally, the room was efficiently washed of the filth of vomit, urine and fecal matterthe final bodily functions of hundreds of victimslest the next trainload of Jewish families become suspicious of what really happened in the bathhouse. There was a tight schedule to keepanother train was scheduled to arrive soonfilled with more trusting people to deceive, murder and incinerate.
The wholesale slaughter of so many people is, to us, a heinous crime of the highest degree, and the deceptive means by which the Nazis lured their victims into the gas chambers only makes their sin more abhorrent to moral minds. Yet the deceit and horror of Auschwitz pales in comparison to a future scene about which the Bible tells us. Then the degree of the deception will be much greater; the fate of the condemned will be much worse; and then their numbers will be much higher.
Unlike Auschwitz, where Jewish families, knowing the hatred of their captors, approached the doors of the gas chambers with some apprehension, these future crowds will be filled with peace as they approach their doom. They had been singing songs of celebration for years in anticipation of the joys they suppose soon await them, but they will be fully self-deceived. And unlike those in Auschwitz, whose horrible sufferings ended after twenty-three minutes, these will suffer much longer. The pungent smoke of Auschwitzs incinerators ultimately ceased rising into the dark sky. The smoke from hell, however, shall rise forever (see Rev. 14:11).
Picture the scene as Jesus foretold it:
Many will say to Me on that day, Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles? And then I will declare to them, I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness (Matt. 7:22-23).
Jesus obviously revealed only the climax of a much longer story, but from this short segment, we can deduce other tragic details.
First, we can safely assume that the arguing we just read of the many who stand before Jesus is their [i]final[/i] defense. They obviously had [i]already[/i] been denied entrance into the heavenly kingdom. Now, with hearts beating wildly and minds spinning, they make their last desperate attempt to convince the Lord of His error.
[i]To debate with God![/i] How outrageous! What could drive a person to be so insane as to hope he might win such a dispute? Only pure desperation. Like a drowning man who grasps at anything, these panicked people pathetically hope to change the decree of the unchanging One.
And what was going through their minds when they heard His decree for the first time? He was their Savior, or so they thought. They loved Him, they thought. They had been looking forward to this day for a long time, expecting to hear Him say, Well done, good and faithful slave...enter into the joy of your master (Matt. 25:21). They had served Him in ministry, experiencing the flow of His power, or so they thought. They had been on the cutting edge of Christianity, prophesying, casting out demons, and performing acts that they considered to be miraculous. Is it not safe to assume they had studied parts of the Bible, attended church, perhaps even attended special seminars on spiritual warfare?
Now, marveling at His glory and filled with joyful anticipation, they listen intently as He is about to speak. Every word will be more precious than gold. Time stands still. Eternity has begun.
His voice breaks the silence: You are denied entrance into My kingdom.
[i]Did He really say what I think I just heard Him say? Surely not. It couldnt be. This is my Lord and Savior.[/i] Lord, I must be so excited that my hearing has gone bad. Could You repeat what You just said?
Again He speaks. You are denied entrance into My kingdom.
[i]What? No! No! No! This cant be happening.[/i] Lord, Im a Christian! Im Your own! I belong to the family of God! I accepted You as my Savior! Ive gone to church for years. Lord, You must be mistaken! Somehow theres been a misunderstanding! I believed in You! Youre supposed to let me in!
You were deceived because you ignored much of what I said, as well as what I said through Paul, Peter, James, John and Jude. I repeatedly forewarned you of this. I said, Not everyone who says to Me, Lord, Lord, will enter the kingdom of heaven; but he who [i]does the will of My Father who is in heaven[/i] (Matt. 7:21, emphasis added). You did not do the will of My Father while you were on the earth, proving that you did not truly believe in Me. Sin was your practice.
Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?
Your prophecy was not inspired by My Holy Spirit, but from your own mind. Much of what you prophesied contradicted My Word. The demons you thought you cast out of your fellow false Christians didnt exist. You were trying to deal with their sin by blaming it on a demon, when what they needed was repentance, faith and the new birth. The miracles you thought you performed were a sham. You accumulated teachers who told you what you wanted to hear. They proclaimed a false grace, misleading you into thinking you could get into heaven without holiness. You thought you were saved, but you werent. I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness.
Will such a scene as Ive just described actually occur? There is no doubt that it will, although Ive obviously added some details to what has been foretold in Matthew 7:21-23. Nevertheless, standing before Jesus one day will be many people who have called Him Lord, who have been involved in ministry, and who expect to enter heaven. Yet, shockingly, they will be denied entrance.
Im sure youll agree that it would be better to discover sooner rather than later if were currently self-deceived. Now there is time to change; then it will be too late.
But Im certain Im not deceived! you say. [i]Do you realize that is what every deceived person would claim?[/i] Deceived people dont realize theyre deceivedotherwise they would no longer be deceived. Better to say, I may be deceived, and if I am, I want to know it.
Let us then consider what Scripture says, and as we do, examine ourselves to see if we are truly in the faith (2 Cor. 13:5). And please, take your time as you read. What could be more important?
The Unrighteous Shall Not Inherit[/b]
[i]Test yourselves to see if you are in the faith; examine yourselves! Or do you not recognize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in youunless indeed you fail the test?[/i] (2 Cor. 13:5).
In the above-quoted verse of Scripture, we find a succinct definition of what a Christian is: He is a person in whom Christ lives. This, as other scriptures reveal, is not a physical but a spiritual indwelling.
If Christ lives within a person, Christ changes him. Obviously, according to Paul, it is possibleand advisableto determine if Christ actually does live inside of us by means of self-examination. Each of us who professes to be a follower of Christ should heed Pauls admonition to the Corinthians, by examining ourselves to see if we are in the faith.
Quite obviously, Paul also believed that it was very possible for church members to be self-deceived, thinking they believed when they really didnt. And what error could be greater? What presumption could have more serious consequences? If an unsaved person knows hes unsaved, at least theres a chance hell acknowledge his state, repent, and turn to Christ. But the self-deceived person is blind to his need. Hes smiling on the road to hell. Worse yet, he considers the peace and joy he feels to be evidence of his salvation, not realizing that they are only the fruit of his self-deception. In his case, unfortunately, ignorance [i]is[/i] bliss, but only temporarily.
Ignorance was indeed the problem in the Corinthian church. Like so many in the church today, their understanding of the gospel was deficient. In their thinking, anyone who made a verbal confession of Christ was a true Christian, regardless of how he lived his life. Case in point: One of their members in good standing was living in sexual immorality with his stepmother. Nothing was being done to correct the matter.
Paul, however, needed no further facts before rendering judgment. He instructed them to excommunicate the man immediately, describing him as wicked: Remove the wicked man from among yourselves (1 Cor. 5:13).
Paul then offered the Corinthian Christians some important insight into the gospel: The grace that forgives also transforms. Thus, people who have [i]not[/i] been transformed are [i]not[/i] forgiven. They will not inherit Gods kingdom. They are all those who are unrighteous in their behavior, and Paul even went so far as to list several examples of the kinds of people God considers unrighteous. Notice he included fornicators in his list:
Do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God (1 Cor. 6:9-10).
Some of Pauls modern readers have been puzzled over this particular passage. Why didnt he instruct the Corinthian church to follow the three steps of church discipline given by Christ, that is, to first confront the wayward brother privately, then by means of a small group, and finally by the entire church, before excommunicating him?
The simple answer is that Christs instructions apply only to dealing with a true Christian believer who has sinned. The immoral man at Corinth, however, had proven beyond all doubt that he was not a true believer in Jesus. He was a phony. His lifestyle betrayed his true character. He was living in fornication. Such persons, along with idolaters, the effeminate, homosexuals, thieves, the covetous, drunkards, revilers and swindlers, Paul categorically stated will not inherit Gods kingdom. They demonstrate by their lifestyles that they do not possess saving faith in Christ; they are not regenerated by the Holy Spirit. Christ does not live in them; thus they dont belong to Him (see Rom. 8:9).
The Corinthians should have known better. Paul had previously written to them on this very subject, but they had apparently misunderstood him:
I wrote you in my letter not to associate with immoral people; I did not at all mean with the immoral people of this world, or with the covetous and swindlers, or with idolaters; for then you would have to go out of the world. But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any [i]so-called brother[/i] if he should be an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindlernot even to eat with such a one (1 Cor. 5:9-11, emphasis added).
The immoral Corinthian church member was, according to Paul, not a true brother, but only a [i]so-called brother[/i]. And failing to understand the inseparable correlation between belief and behavior, the church to which he belonged failed to discern that his confession of faith was bogus.
[b]Spiritual Babes or Phony Believers?[/b]
Realizing the far-reaching effects of such lack of discernment by the church, Paul had good reason to question, not only the salvation of one immoral Corinthian church member, but the salvation of others within the same church. There was strife, factions and jealousy (see 1 Cor. 1:10-12; 3:1-4). For those who have just been born again, these can be indications of spiritual babyhood, due primarily to lack of knowledge of Gods will. Until now, the Corinthians had only been fed the milk of Gods Word (see 1 Cor. 3:2). So Paul informed them how their selfishness displeased God, expecting that they, now enlightened to the truth, would repent.
Persisting in these same sins after enlightenment, however, is a different story. In his letter to the Galatians, Paul included jealousy and strife in a list quite similar to his Corinthian catalog, sins which, if practiced, are evidence that a person, like the practicing adulterer or fornicator, will not inherit Gods kingdom:
Now the deeds of the flesh are evident, which are: immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, [i]enmities, strife, jealousy, outbursts of anger, disputes, dissensions, factions, envying[/i], drunkenness, carousing, and things like these, of which I forewarn you just as I have forewarned you that [i]those who practice such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God[/i] (Gal. 5:19-21, emphasis added).
Clearly, what may mark one person as a babe in Christ can mark another person as unsaved. The difference between the two is time and knowledge. God expects that His true children will obey Him once they know what He expects. Those who profess to be His children yet persist in the practice of lawlessness even after enlightenment are deceived. People who have been truly born again yearn to be holy; they hunger and thirst for righteousness (Matt. 5:6). God is at work within them to complete the good work He began in their lives (see Phil. 1:6; 2:13). Thus, if our faith is not resulting in our sanctification (increasing holiness), let us not think our faith is resulting in our justification (being declared guiltless before God) either. There is no such thing as justification that is not followed by sanctification. For this reason Scripture says, Pursue...the sanctification [i]without which no one will see the Lord[/i] (Heb. 12:14, emphasis added). Heaven is not for the unholy.
[b]Is this Not Salvation by Works?[/b]
When Paul warns us that those who practice unrighteousness will not inherit Gods kingdom, is he not contradicting his own teaching that salvation is purely by Gods grace, received through faith? Is salvation earned by not practicing certain sins?
No, as we will clearly discover as we study more closely what Paul taught, those who truly receive by faith Gods gracious gift of salvation are transformed by His Holy Spirit. Because of His wonderful work in their lives, they become holy and continue to grow holier. They are born again, and the power of sin is broken over their lives. Christ lives in them. They become new creations. No longer are their lives characterized by the practice of sin. Certainly, true believers sometimes still do sin, but they no longer [i]practice[/i] it. As the apostle John wrote:
If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness....No one who is born of God [i]practices sin[/i], because His seed abides in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God (1 John 1:8-9; 3:9, emphasis added).
The salvation that comes through Jesus Christ not only provides forgiveness of sin, it provides deliverance from sin. A growing holiness is the result of receiving the free gift of salvation. Note carefully the words that follow Pauls most well-known affirmation of the freeness of salvation:
For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, that no one should boast. [i]For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them[/i] (Eph. 2:8-10, emphasis added).
Salvation is not a result of our good works; good works, however, are a result of our salvation.
[b]Gods Purpose in Salvation[/b]
Gods purpose in saving us was not just to give us a legal stamp of forgiveness that nullifies our list of sins. His purpose was to make us holy, obedient people, conformed to the image of Christ. He gives not only an imputed legal righteousness, but re-creates us to experience a real and practical righteousness. One cannot be received exclusive of the other. In fact, the apostle John tells us who has truly received imputed legal righteousness: those who practice a lifestyle of [i]practical[/i] righteousness:
Little children, let no one deceive you; [i]the one who practices righteousness is righteous[/i], just as He is righteous; the one who practices sin is of the devil; for the devil has sinned from the beginning. The Son of God appeared for this purpose, that He might destroy the works of the devil (1 John 3:7-8, emphasis added).
Sin is the work of the devil. The salvation Jesus offers destroys Satans works in our lives.
| 2008/11/1 20:48||Profile|
Santa Clara, CA
| The Great Gospel Deception ~ David Servant|
[b]James on Works[/b]
Of course, before we can receive the salvation that forgives and delivers us from sin, we must realize our need for it. Tragically, many church members consider themselves Christians simply because theyve prayed a sinners prayer or acknowledged certain theological facts. They think they possess a salvation that has provided forgiveness, but that provides very little, if any, transformation in their lives. Yet it doesnt bother them because they know that salvation is by grace and not works. In their minds, works are unimportant and optional.
Yet the Bible states that it is impossible to have a saving faith that doesnt produce works. The apostle James wrote that a faith void of works is useless, dead, and cannot save:
What use is it, my brethren, if a man says he has faith, but he has no works? [i]Can that faith save him?[/i]....Even so faith, if it has no works, is dead, being by itself....But are you willing to recognize, you foolish fellow, that faith without works is useless? (James 2:14, 17, 20, emphasis added).
Thus, the true test of our faith is our behavior. And that is why Paul warns us, admonishing us to examine our lives to determine if our faith and salvation are bogus. Again, our works dont earn us salvation; our works prove that we possess true saving faith and the indwelling Holy Spirit.
Let us, then, heed Pauls admonition to examine ourselves using his own God-given tests. Determining where we stand is the first step. If we discover that we fail the test of experiencing true salvation, then there is hope that we can and will receive it.
[b]An Initial Self-Exam[/b]
Consider these three scriptures (two of which weve already examined), in which Paul lists specific sinful practices that characterize those who will not inherit Gods kingdom:
Do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither [i]fornicators[/i], nor [i]idolaters[/i], nor [i]adulterers[/i], nor [i]effeminate[/i], nor [i]homosexuals[/i], nor [i]thieves[/i], nor the [i]covetous[/i], nor [i]drunkards[/i], nor [i]revilers[/i], nor [i]swindlers[/i], shall inherit the kingdom of God (1 Cor. 6:9-10, emphasis added).
Now the deeds of the flesh are evident, which are: [i]immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, outbursts of anger, disputes, dissensions, factions, envying, drunkenness, carousing, and things like these[/i], of which I forewarn you just as I have forewarned you that those who practice such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God (Gal. 5:19-21, emphasis added).
For this you know with certainty, that no [i]immoral[/i] or [i]impure[/i] person or [i]covetous[/i] man, who is an idolater, has an inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience (Eph. 5:5-6, emphasis added).
From these three passages of Scripture, we can compile a list of sins, which, if practiced, are sure evidence that a person has not been regenerated. They can be classed in five categories, the first being sexual sins: fornication, adultery, immorality, impurity, sensuality, effeminacy, and homosexuality. The second are sins of larceny: greed/coveting, thievery, and swindling. The third are sins of intemperance: drunkenness, carousing and reviling. The fourth are sins of hatred: enmity, strife, jealousy, outbursts of anger, disputes, dissensions, factions and envying. The fifth are sins of false religion: idolatry and sorcery.
Notice, however, that Pauls lists are by no means exhaustive. He states in general that [i]all[/i] unrighteous people will not inherit Gods kingdom (see 1 Cor. 6:9). At the end of his list of sins in Galatians 5, Paul adds, and things like these (Gal. 5:21). We also note that neither murderers nor liars are mentioned in any of Pauls lists, but this doesnt exempt them. John wrote, No murderer has eternal life abiding in him (1 John 3:15), and, All liars, their part will be in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone (Rev. 21:8).
Although it is certainly possible for a born-again person to reluctantly and temporarily stumble into one or more of these various sins, no true believer will practice these sins. His life is characterized by righteousness, not unrighteousness, because he has submitted to the Lord from his heart, and his spirit has been re-created by the Holy Spirit.
[b]An Objection Answered[/b]
It has been proposed by some recent authors that when Paul warned practicing sinners that they would not inherit the kingdom of God, he was not speaking of eternal salvation. Not inheriting the kingdom of God is interpreted as being either (1) the forfeiture of certain earthly blessings or (2) the loss of certain heavenly bonuses, perks that more holy Christians will automatically enjoy.
Those who want us to believe that Paul was referring only to earthly blessings point out that Paul was speaking about the kingdom of God, and not the kingdom of heaven. Thus, they conclude that he was not talking about getting into heaven, but about walking in the full blessing of Gods kingdom now on earth.
A study of the phrase, the kingdom of God, however, as it was used by Jesus, reveals that it is synonymous with the phrase kingdom of heaven. Only Matthew quotes Jesus as using the phrase kingdom of heaven, probably in deference to his Jewish readership, whereas Mark and Luke quote Jesus using the phrase kingdom of God in parallel passages (compare, for example, Matthew 13:11 with Mark 4:11 and Luke 8:10). The kingdom of God is the same as the kingdom of heaven.
Some who subscribe to the theory that Paul was referring only to heavenly bonuses point out that he didnt warn about not [i]entering[/i] Gods kingdom, but rather, warned about not [i]inheriting[/i] it, claiming there is a difference between the two. Unholy Christians will [i]enter[/i] Gods kingdom, but not [i]inherit[/i] it! Theyll supposedly miss out on some heavenly rewards.
Is this the true meaning of what Paul wanted to convey? Or did he mean that practicing sinners will not [i]enter[/i] heaven?
Quite obviously, for a number of good reasons, Paul was speaking of ultimate salvation and entering heaven.
First, because that is the most natural interpretation of his words. Why would Pauls warnings to practicing sinners be so solemn if those sinners were only in danger of missing out on some heavenly bonuses? And if forfeiting heavenly bonuses was the danger Paul had in mind, why didnt he express his meaning more clearly? Like the innocent little boy who, after hearing his pastor explain what Paul really meant in a certain scripture passage, I also ask, If Paul didnt mean what he said, why didnt he just say what he meant?
Second, Paul pronounced Gods eternal condemnation upon homosexuals in his letter to the Romans (see Rom. 1:26-2:5). Are we then to think that his Corinthian warning to homosexuals that they will not inherit Gods kingdom is only a warning that they will miss out on some heavenly rewards on their certain journey to heaven?
Third, the apostle John wrote that immoral people and idolaters will be in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death (Rev. 21:8). Are we then to think that Pauls Corinthian warning to immoral people and idolaters is only a warning that they will miss out on some heavenly rewards on their certain journey to heaven?
Fourth, Paul used the phrase inherit the kingdom of God twice while writing to the Corinthians, once in his warning to practicing sinners and once in the fifteenth chapter. In the context of the second usage, Paul was unmistakably writing about the time when we will enter into heaven:
Now I say this, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot [i]inherit the kingdom of God[/i]; nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable (1 Cor. 15:50, emphasis added).
Paul was clearly communicating that our perishable, flesh and blood bodies cannot enter heaven. No doubt he borrowed the expression under consideration from Jesus Himself:
Then the King will say to those on His right, Come, you who are blessed of My Father, [i]inherit the kingdom[/i] prepared for you from the foundation of the world (Matt. 25:34, emphasis added).
Was the King speaking about receiving earthly blessings or heavenly perks, or was He speaking of getting into heaven? The answer is quite obvious. The King will say to the other group assembled before Him, Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire (Matt. 25:41).
For these and other reasons, we can rest assured that when Paul warned practicing sinners about not inheriting Gods kingdom, he was talking about entering heaven. His choice of words, using [i]inherit[/i] as opposed to [i]enter[/i], only serves to emphasize that heaven is a gift of Gods grace, inherited, and not earned.
[b]A Second Objection[/b]
One popular author claims that the initial text Ive used for this chapter, 2 Corinthians 13:5, where Paul admonished the Corinthians to test themselves to see if they are in the faith, was written to encourage the Corinthians to recognize the salvation they clearly possess. That is, they should have been checking themselves not for [i]information[/i] but for [i]confirmation[/i]. Supposedly Paul was very confident of their salvation and certainly didnt intend for them to question their possessing it.
Is this true? Clearly the answer is [i]no[/i]. Let us consider Pauls words in their immediate context. First, lets consider the preceding verses:
For I am afraid that perhaps when I come [i]I may find you to be not what I wish[/i] and may be found by you to be not what you wish; [i]that perhaps there may be strife, jealousy, angry tempers, disputes, slanders, gossip, arrogance, disturbances[/i]; I am afraid that when I come again my God may humiliate me before you, and [i]I may mourn over many of those who have sinned in the past and not repented of the impurity, immorality and sensuality which they have practiced[/i] (2 Cor. 12:20-21, emphasis added).
Clearly, Paul was concerned that when he visited the Corinthians again, he would be disappointed by their behavior. He cites numerous sins of which he had previously mentioned in his letters to them, and he states his specific fear of finding them guilty and unrepentant of practicing [i]impurity, immorality and sensuality[/i]. Paul listed [i]those very same three sins[/i] in Galatians 5:19, stating that those who practice them will not inherit Gods kingdom. Additionally, Paul had written in his first letter to the Corinthians that neither fornicators, adulterers, effeminate nor homosexuals would inherit Gods kingdom (see 1 Cor. 6:9-10).
Beyond this, Paul also expressed his fear of finding strife, jealousy, angry tempers and disputes when he came to Corinth, four other sins which he listed in Galatians 5:20, stating that those who practice such things will not inherit Gods kingdom. Are we to conclude that Paul was confident of their salvation, as one very popular author wants us to believe, when he has made it so clear that people who act like some of the Corinthians were acting are obviously not saved?
Read carefully as Paul continues:
This is the third time I am coming to you. Every fact is to be confirmed by the testimony of two or three witnesses. I have previously said when present the second time, and though now absent I say in advance to those who have sinned in the past and to all the rest as well, that if I come again, [i]I will not spare anyone[/i] (2 Cor. 13:1-2, emphasis added).
What kind of facts was Paul speaking of that were to be confirmed by the testimony of two or three witnesses? Paul could only have been speaking of the facts of the sins committed by professing Corinthian believers. The context as well as the phrasing points to this (see the verse before and after 13:1, as well as Deut. 19:15).
Paul then threatens those who have sinned in the past and to all the rest as well that if he returns, he will not spare anyone. In what way will he not spare them? Will he tell them that they are doing wrong? No, hes already clearly told them that. Paul can only be threatening that he will do what he ordered the Corinthians to do to a false believer in the church who was living in immorality: He will excommunicate them also as false believers, as proven by their continued practice of grievous sin and lack of repentance. Otherwise his bark has no bite.
Since you are seeking for proof of the Christ who speaks in me, and who is not weak toward you, but mighty in you. For indeed He was crucified because of weakness, yet He lives because of the power of God. For we also are weak in Him, yet we shall live with Him because of the power of God directed toward you. [i]Test yourselves to see if you are in the faith; examine yourselves![/i]do you not recognize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you[i]ess indeed you fail the test?[/i] But I trust that you will realize that we ourselves do not fail the test (2 Cor. 13:3-6, emphasis added).
Paul wrote, Test yourselves to see [i]if[/i] you are in the faith. Notice the word [i]if[/i]. That indicates the possibility that they were not in the faith. Paul did not say, Test yourselves and you will see that you are in the faith, because Im very confident of your salvation.
Notice he also wrote that they should recognize that Jesus was in them, [i]unless indeed you fail the test[/i]. Is this not a clear indication that Paul believed the sure possibility existed that some of them might fail the test? Certainly. This becomes even more clear in 13:6 when he contrasts himself and Timothy (see 2 Cor. 1:1) with them: But I trust that you will realize that we ourselves do not fail the test. The Corinthians might fail the test, but he and Timothy would not. It was obvious that Jesus lived in Paul and Timothy, but it was not so obvious that Jesus lived in all the Corinthians who professed to believe in Him.
The biblical evidence is overwhelming: The new birth changes the behavior of sinners, sometimes radically in the case of gross sinners. Why is it then that the behavior of so many people who claim to be born again is not much different from those who dont claim to be born again? For example, pollster George Barna has noted,
A recent study we conducted showed that born-again Christians substantially differed from non-Christians on just nine of the 66 variables on which we compared the two groups. Even more significant was the finding that Christians were virtually indistinguishable from nonbelievers on all 65 of the nonreligious variables we examinedmatters of core values, defining attitudes and central behavior tendencies.
Barnas polls also revealed that, while 87% of non-Christians said they had watched a PG-13 or R-rated movie in the past three months, 76% of born-again Christians had done the same. Amazingly, [i]non[/i]-Christians were more likely than born-again Christians to have given to a nonprofit organization in the past year, and were also more likely to have given money to a homeless or poor person.
There can be only one conclusion: Many people who think they are born again are not. They think they are going to heaven but arent.
How do you measure up? If youve just realized that you have been self-deceived, you should fall on your knees before God, repent of all known sins, and cry out to God to change you by His Holy Spirit. Truly receive Jesus as your Savior from Gods wrath and sin, trusting in Him alone. Make Him your Lord and Master. He will begin a transforming work in you and deliver you from sins power!
 Some have suggested that the Corinthians had completed the first and second steps of proper church discipline, and that Paul was instructing them to take the final step. This is proven to be an incorrect interpretation, however, by Pauls words in 5:2, which describe how the Corinthians were treating the wicked man: And you have become arrogant, and have not mourned instead, in order that the one who had done this deed might be removed from your midst. Rather than mourning over and confronting the sin of their fellow church member, they were proud of their toleration.
 If we are not supposed to eat with so-called brothers who are immoral, covetous, and so on, then we must have the right to judge those who are within the church in such matters. This Paul endorses; see 1 Cor. 5:12.
 Many modern commentators make the same mistake as the Corinthians, maintaining that the immoral man was a true Christian, thus completely missing Pauls point in this passage. Yet there are at least five indications that Paul considered the immoral Corinthian man to be unsaved: (1) Paul called him a so-called brother (5:11); (2) Paul called him a wicked man (5:13); (3) Paul did not follow Christs instructions for disciplining a brother who had sinned, indicating that he didnt believe the man was a brother; (4) Paul turned the immoral man over to Satan that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus (5:5), indicating that, if the man continued in his present state, his spirit would not be saved. However, by excommunicating him, there would be hope that he would repent and be saved once he recognized that the church didnt accept his testimony of faith; and (5) Paul clearly stated that fornicators and adulterers would not inherit Gods kingdom (6:9-10). It is crystal clear.
 [i]Igniting a Moral and Spiritual Revolution[/i]: Social Scientist Analyzes the Data, by George Barna, in the Promise Keeper, Vol. 2, No. 1, January/February 1999, p. 1.
 See [i]The Second Coming of the Church[/i] (Word: Dallas, 1998), by George Barna, p. 6.
[i](Italics extant to the best of my noting them)[/i]
Numbered links to the footnotes as well as the remaning chapters of the book can be found here:
[url=http://www.shepherdserve.org/ggd/ggd_01.htm]The Great Gospel Deception[/url]
| 2008/11/1 20:51||Profile|
Santa Clara, CA
| Re: The Great Gospel Deception ~ David Servant|
[url=http://www.shepherdserve.org/ggd/ggd_03.htm]The Greedy Christian[/url]
"How Poor Are We?"
| 2008/11/8 23:44||Profile|
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
[url=http://www.shepherdserve.org/ggd/ggd_03.htm]The Greedy Christian[/url]
"How Poor Are We?"
Matthew 25 has been coming up quite frequently, having been in my own personal Bible reading and also preached from the pulpit last weekend. It is causing me to evaluate a lot of things.
A quote from the linked article:
"There are, of course, a myriad of excuses for doing nothing to assist desperately poor believers and non-believers, but well-fed Christians will find no solace from the Bible. Although no one can rightfully set up arbitrary rules concerning how much should be given and how much should be kept, the consensus of Scripture is clear: Christians who are able to give to the poor are expected by God to give, especially to impoverished fellow believers (see Gal. 6:10). Professing Christians who demonstrate no such concern are very likely counterfeit Christians, and this obviously includes many among modern Christendom who have bought into the modern lie of a customized Christianity of selfish convenience.
According to a Gallup pole, only 25% of evangelical Christians tithe. Forty percent claim that God is the most important thing in their lives, yet those who make between $50-75,000 per year give an average of 1.5 percent of their incomes to charity, including religious charity. Meanwhile, they spend an average of 12% of their incomes on leisure pursuit.
Greed is not only expressed by what we do with our money, but also by what we do with our time. If all our time is spent on selfish pursuits or pleasures, we are being greedy. The time God has given to us on this earth is a sacred trust. We should spend as much of our time as we can in serving. All of us, not just pastors, can obey Jesus command to visit fellow believers who are sick or imprisoned."
| 2008/11/9 9:15||Profile|
| Re: The Great Gospel Deception ~ David Servant|
I have this book but it was before he changed his last name from Kirkwood to Servant. I never understood why he did this.
He was involved with Andrew Strom and his meetings.
| 2008/11/9 11:43|
| Re: David Servant|
freecd - I sent you a pm brother...
| 2008/11/9 14:48|