From the things last spoken, we gather no trifling conjecture concerning the situation of the town of Capernaum.
Josephus relates that the country of Gennesar, which we have described, was watered |with a spring of excellent water; the people thereabouts call it Capernaum.| From that either the city hath its name, or rather that hath its name from the city; and the city from the pleasantness of the place. The evangelists, compared together, do make it clear, that this city was seated in the land of Gennesaret. For when it is said by Matthew and Mark, that Christ, sailing over from the desert of Bethsaida, arrived at the country of Gennesaret, Matthew 14:34; Mark 6:53, it is manifest from John that he arrived at Capernaum, John 6:22,24,25. When, therefore, that most pleasant country lay near Tiberias, and that Capernaum was in that country, -- we must necessarily suppose that it was not very remote from Tiberias.
It was |upon the sea-coasts, in the borders of Zabulon and Nephthali,| Matthew 4:13: -- not that it was the bounds of each, but because it was within the borders of Zabulon and Nephthali, they being put in opposition to the other parts of Galilee. So, |the borders of Tyre and Sidon,| Mark 7:24, denote not that very centre where the territories of Tyre are parted from those of Sidon; but the |bounds of Tyre and Sidon,| as distinguished from the bounds of Galilee. Nevertheless, neither was this city far distant form the very limits, where the bounds of Zabulon and Nephthali did touch upon one another, -- namely, near the south coast of the sea of Gennesaret, which we observed before.
We suppose Capernaum seated between Tiberias and Tarichee. Whether, Cepharnome, in Josephus, be the same with this, we do inquire.