|
Open as PDF
"Art Katz encouraged the duplicating of his audio messages, and there are no copyright claims for those who desire to share them with others. However, Art’s books and writings (including articles on this website) do still carry a copyright, and permission needs to be sought if quoting from those is required."
-----
In view of Leviticus 17:11, ought we not, as Jews, to consider that, “without the shedding of blood there is no remission for sin”?
That Isaiah 53 condemns and renders invalid any attempt of man by ‘mitzvot’ or deed to attain to righteousness? That one cannot circumvent this remarkable provision of God by privately assuming a negotiated repentance and a divinely received forgiveness? Is not this assumption the very setting aside of the non-negotiable Law of Moses and the Prophets (for example, Isaiah 53)? Are our current Judaistic and religious equivalents and practices being performed with the assumption that God is content? Why do we refuse to include in the annual Haphtarah readings this most significant section from Isaiah? Would it be out of place then to consider that our entire historic calamity, as Jews, is much rather the statement of His displeasure rather than His acceptance?
In a book addressed specifically for Jewish consideration, the New Testament instructs us:
How much severer punishment do you think he will deserve who has trampled under foot the Son of God, and has regarded as unclean the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and has insulted the Spirit of grace? For we know him who said “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay.” And again, “The Lord will judge His people.” (Hebrews 10:29-30, quoting Deuteronomy 32:35, 36).
Take care, brethren, that there not be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart that falls away from the living God. But encourage one another day after day, as long as it is still called “Today,” so that none of you will be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin. (Hebrews 3:12-13).
On remote occasions, you will find some Jews, who, instinctively recognizing the need for atonement through shed blood, ‘shlug kapporah.’ That is, they swirl over their and their children’s heads a slain chicken! This reaches back to the biblical injunction in Leviticus 17 cited above. How pathetic is this and every alternative to the provision of God prophesied in Isaiah 53 of One who would “render Himself as a guilt offering, He will see His offspring, He will prolong His days, And the good pleasure of the Lord will prosper in His hand” (chap. 53:10b). |
|
|
|
